Facebook
TwitterThis statistic represents the ranking in the Gulf Cooperation Council region for quality of the education system in 2018, by country. During the measured time period, the rank of Qatar was ***** out of 140 countries for the quality of the education system.
Facebook
TwitterThis ranking was created by aggregating data from 14 websites and counting how many times each country was mentioned in the top 3, top 5, and top 10 places. There is no official measures or rankings for a countries education system.
The 14 web sources are as follows: https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/education-rankings-by-country https://worldtop20.org/worldbesteducationsystem https://www.currentschoolnews.com/education-news/best-educational-system-in-the-world/ https://www.edsys.in/best-education-system-in-the-world/ https://www.indiaeducation.net/studyabroad/articles/countries-with-the-best-higher-education-system.html http://blog.mpanchang.com/10-best-education-systems-in-the-world/ https://admission.buddy4study.com/study-abroad/best-education-systems-in-world https://www.usnews.com/news/best-countries/best-education https://www.theedadvocate.org/the-edvocates-list-of-the-20-best-education-systems-in-the-world/ https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/10-countries-with-the-best-education-systems.html https://ceoworld.biz/2020/05/10/ranked-worlds-best-countries-for-education-system-2020/ https://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/11-best-school-systems-world-a7425391.html https://naijaquest.com/best-education-system-in-the-world/ https://mintbook.com/blog/best-educational-systems-in-the-world/
Created for BAD 52 - Human Relations in Organizations from the Santa Rosa Junior College in Fall 2020.
Facebook
TwitterFinland had the highest quality of primary education in the world in 2017, with an index score of ***. The index runs on a scale of one (low quality) to seven (very good). Switzerland, Singapore, the Netherlands, and Estonia rounded out the top five for countries with the highest quality of primary education. A solid foundation Primary school age children are generally between the ages of six and eleven years old. Primary school is the first stage of formal education and consists of general knowledge and fundamental skills in areas like mathematics, reading, writing, and science, with student enrollment rates being particularly high in advanced economies. This helps young students to form a solid base for further study as they get older. Primary education in the United States Primary schools in the United States, where they are called elementary schools, can be either private or public institutions, with enrollment in public schools generally higher than in private schools. Education from the age of five is mandatory in the U.S., whether that be through the state-funded public school system, private schooling, or through an approved home school program. Depending on state law, students can leave school between the ages of 16 and 18.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.worldbank.org/en/about/legal/terms-of-use-for-datasetshttps://www.worldbank.org/en/about/legal/terms-of-use-for-datasets
Dataset Overview 📝
The dataset includes the following key indicators, collected for over 200 countries:
Data Source 🌐
World Bank: This dataset is compiled from the World Bank's educational database, providing reliable, updated statistics on educational progress worldwide.
Potential Use Cases 🔍 This dataset is ideal for anyone interested in:
Educational Research: Understanding how education spending and policies impact literacy, enrollment, and overall educational outcomes. Predictive Modeling: Building models to predict educational success factors, such as completion rates and literacy. Global Education Analysis: Analyzing trends in global education systems and how different countries allocate resources to education. Policy Development: Helping governments and organizations make data-driven decisions regarding educational reforms and funding.
Key Questions You Can Explore 🤔
How does government expenditure on education correlate with literacy rates and school enrollment across different regions? What are the trends in pupil-teacher ratios over time, and how do they affect educational outcomes? How do education indicators differ between low-income and high-income countries? Can we predict which countries will achieve universal primary education based on current trends?
Important Notes ⚠️ - Missing Data: Some values may be missing for certain years or countries. Consider using techniques like forward filling or interpolation when working with time series models. - Data Limitations: This dataset provides global averages and may not capture regional disparities within countries.
Facebook
TwitterApache License, v2.0https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
License information was derived automatically
This meticulously curated dataset offers a panoramic view of education on a global scale , delivering profound insights into the dynamic landscape of education across diverse countries and regions. Spanning a rich tapestry of educational aspects, it encapsulates crucial metrics including out-of-school rates, completion rates, proficiency levels, literacy rates, birth rates, and primary and tertiary education enrollment statistics. A treasure trove of knowledge, this dataset is an indispensable asset for discerning researchers, dedicated educators, and forward-thinking policymakers, enabling them to embark on a transformative journey of assessing, enhancing, and reshaping education systems worldwide.
Key Features: - Countries and Areas: Name of the countries and areas. - Latitude: Latitude coordinates of the geographical location. - Longitude: Longitude coordinates of the geographical location. - OOSR_Pre0Primary_Age_Male: Out-of-school rate for pre-primary age males. - OOSR_Pre0Primary_Age_Female: Out-of-school rate for pre-primary age females. - OOSR_Primary_Age_Male: Out-of-school rate for primary age males. - OOSR_Primary_Age_Female: Out-of-school rate for primary age females. - OOSR_Lower_Secondary_Age_Male: Out-of-school rate for lower secondary age males. - OOSR_Lower_Secondary_Age_Female: Out-of-school rate for lower secondary age females. - OOSR_Upper_Secondary_Age_Male: Out-of-school rate for upper secondary age males. - OOSR_Upper_Secondary_Age_Female: Out-of-school rate for upper secondary age females. - Completion_Rate_Primary_Male: Completion rate for primary education among males. - Completion_Rate_Primary_Female: Completion rate for primary education among females. - Completion_Rate_Lower_Secondary_Male: Completion rate for lower secondary education among males. - Completion_Rate_Lower_Secondary_Female: Completion rate for lower secondary education among females. - Completion_Rate_Upper_Secondary_Male: Completion rate for upper secondary education among males. - Completion_Rate_Upper_Secondary_Female: Completion rate for upper secondary education among females. - Grade_2_3_Proficiency_Reading: Proficiency in reading for grade 2-3 students. - Grade_2_3_Proficiency_Math: Proficiency in math for grade 2-3 students. - Primary_End_Proficiency_Reading: Proficiency in reading at the end of primary education. - Primary_End_Proficiency_Math: Proficiency in math at the end of primary education. - Lower_Secondary_End_Proficiency_Reading: Proficiency in reading at the end of lower secondary education. - Lower_Secondary_End_Proficiency_Math: Proficiency in math at the end of lower secondary education. - Youth_15_24_Literacy_Rate_Male: Literacy rate among male youths aged 15-24. - Youth_15_24_Literacy_Rate_Female: Literacy rate among female youths aged 15-24. - Birth_Rate: Birth rate in the respective countries/areas. - Gross_Primary_Education_Enrollment: Gross enrollment in primary education. - Gross_Tertiary_Education_Enrollment: Gross enrollment in tertiary education. - Unemployment_Rate: Unemployment rate in the respective countries/areas.
Facebook
TwitterThe OECD has initiated PISA for Development (PISA-D) in response to the rising need of developing countries to collect data about their education systems and the capacity of their student bodies. This report aims to compare and contrast approaches regarding the instruments that are used to collect data on (a) component skills and cognitive instruments, (b) contextual frameworks, and (c) the implementation of the different international assessments, as well as approaches to include children who are not at school, and the ways in which data are used. It then seeks to identify assessment practices in these three areas that will be useful for developing countries. This report reviews the major international and regional large-scale educational assessments: large-scale international surveys, school-based surveys and household-based surveys. For each of the issues discussed, there is a description of the prevailing international situation, followed by a consideration of the issue for developing countries and then a description of the relevance of the issue to PISA for Development.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://datacatalog.worldbank.org/public-licenses?fragment=cchttps://datacatalog.worldbank.org/public-licenses?fragment=cc
Patterns of educational attainment vary greatly across countries, and across population groups within countries. In some countries, virtually all children complete basic education whereas in others large groups fall short. The primary purpose of this database, and the associated research program, is to document and analyze these differences using a compilation of a variety of household-based data sets: Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS); Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS); Living Standards Measurement Study Surveys (LSMS); as well as country-specific Integrated Household Surveys (IHS) such as Socio-Economic Surveys.
As shown at the website associated with this database, there are dramatic differences in attainment by wealth. When households are ranked according to their wealth status (or more precisely, a proxy based on the assets owned by members of the household) there are striking differences in the attainment patterns of children from the richest 20 percent compared to the poorest 20 percent.
In Mali in 2012 only 34 percent of 15 to 19 year olds in the poorest quintile have completed grade 1 whereas 80 percent of the richest quintile have done so. In many countries, for example Pakistan, Peru and Indonesia, almost all the children from the wealthiest households have completed at least one year of schooling. In some countries, like Mali and Pakistan, wealth gaps are evident from grade 1 on, in other countries, like Peru and Indonesia, wealth gaps emerge later in the school system.
The EdAttain website allows a visual exploration of gaps in attainment and enrollment within and across countries, based on the international database which spans multiple years from over 120 countries and includes indicators disaggregated by wealth, gender and urban/rural location. The database underlying that site can be downloaded from here.
Facebook
TwitterThe University of Oxford was the top ranked university in the UK in 2025, and was given an overall score of 98.5 by Times Higher Education, while the University of Cambridge had the second highest score of 97.4. The third and fourth highest ranked Universities were all located in London.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
The QS World University Rankings for 2025 is a list of universities from all over the world, organized to show which ones are the best in various areas. It is widely recognized as one of the most reliable ways to compare higher education institutions. This ranking helps students, researchers, and decision-makers understand how well universities perform in terms of academics, teaching, research, and global connections. Let’s break it down into simple parts so that you can understand it easily.
What’s in the Ranking? The ranking includes several key pieces of information about each university:
University Name: This is simply the name of the school. For example, Harvard University or Oxford University. Ranking Position: This tells you the university’s position on the list, like 1st, 50th, or 200th. A lower number means the university is ranked higher. Country/Region: This shows where the university is located, like the USA, the UK, or Japan. Academic Reputation Score: This score is based on surveys of professors and researchers. They give their opinions on which universities are best for studying and learning. Employer Reputation Score: Employers are asked which universities produce the most skilled graduates. This score shows how good a university is at preparing students for jobs. Faculty-Student Ratio: This measures how many students there are per teacher. A lower number means smaller classes and more personal attention for students. Citations per Faculty: This is about research. It shows how often the university’s studies are mentioned in other research papers. The more citations, the better. International Faculty & Students: This looks at how many teachers and students come from different countries, showing how global and diverse the university is. Why Is This Ranking Useful? There are many ways this ranking can help people:
For Students: It helps students decide where they might want to study. For example, if someone wants a university with a good reputation for teaching and research, they can use this ranking to find the best options. For Universities: Schools can use the rankings to see how they compare to others. If one university is ranked lower than another, it can look at the scores to find ways to improve. For Researchers: Researchers can study the ranking to learn about trends in global education. For example, they might explore why certain regions, like Asia or Europe, have universities that are improving quickly. For Policymakers: Governments and organizations can use the rankings to decide where to invest in education. They can also study which areas of education are most important for the future. What Can We Learn from It? The QS World University Rankings help us learn which universities are leading in academics and research. It also shows us how important global diversity is in education. By understanding these rankings, people can make smarter decisions about studying, teaching, or improving education systems. It’s like a guidebook for the world of universities, helping everyone find the best options and learn from the best practices.
Facebook
TwitterCOVID-19 caused significant disruption to the global education system. A thorough analysis of recorded learning loss evidence documented since the beginning of the school closures between March 2020 and March 2022 finds even evidence of learning loss. Most studies observed increases in inequality where certain demographics of students experienced more significant learning losses than others. But there are also outliers, countries that managed to limit the amount of loss. This review consolidates all the available evidence and documents the empirical findings. Data for 41 countries is included, together with other variables related to the pandemic experience. This data is publicly available and will be updated regularly.
The data covers 41 countries.
Country
Aggregate data [agg]
Other [oth]
Facebook
TwitterThe methodology for the Times Higher Education Arab University Rankings 2023 is based on that of our World University Rankings, with some adjustments and new metrics to reflect the region. Universities are judged across all their core missions – teaching, research, society and international outlook. This edition has an updated methodology, in line with changes made to the World University Rankings methodology this year. Some institutions’ scores will be affected by this and we would advise noting that when making year-on-year comparisons.
Facebook
TwitterData on the top universities for Computer Science in 2025.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.wiseguyreports.com/pages/privacy-policyhttps://www.wiseguyreports.com/pages/privacy-policy
| BASE YEAR | 2024 |
| HISTORICAL DATA | 2019 - 2023 |
| REGIONS COVERED | North America, Europe, APAC, South America, MEA |
| REPORT COVERAGE | Revenue Forecast, Competitive Landscape, Growth Factors, and Trends |
| MARKET SIZE 2024 | 5.8(USD Billion) |
| MARKET SIZE 2025 | 6.22(USD Billion) |
| MARKET SIZE 2035 | 12.5(USD Billion) |
| SEGMENTS COVERED | Software Type, Deployment Type, End User, Functionality, Regional |
| COUNTRIES COVERED | US, Canada, Germany, UK, France, Russia, Italy, Spain, Rest of Europe, China, India, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, Rest of APAC, Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Rest of South America, GCC, South Africa, Rest of MEA |
| KEY MARKET DYNAMICS | increasing digitalization in education, growing demand for automation, emphasis on data security, rising adoption of cloud solutions, need for improved student engagement |
| MARKET FORECAST UNITS | USD Billion |
| KEY COMPANIES PROFILED | K12 Inc., SchoolMint, Frog Education, Seesaw, Schoology, Learner's Edge, Aspire Technologies, PowerSchool, Blackbaud, Factored School, Alma, Edmodo, Infinite Campus, ClassTag, Teaching Strategies, Sysco Education, Skyward |
| MARKET FORECAST PERIOD | 2025 - 2035 |
| KEY MARKET OPPORTUNITIES | Cloud-based solutions adoption, Integration of AI technologies, Growing demand for mobile access, Increased focus on data analytics, Expansion in developing regions |
| COMPOUND ANNUAL GROWTH RATE (CAGR) | 7.2% (2025 - 2035) |
Facebook
TwitterThe Social Progress Index ranks countries based on the well-being and quality of life of their citizens, considering factors such as access to education, healthcare, human rights, and environmental sustainability.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policy
The global Kindergarten through Twelfth Grade (K-12) tutoring market size was valued at approximately USD 105 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 190 billion by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 6.7% during the forecast period. The growth of this market is primarily driven by the increasing emphasis on quality education and the rising demand for personalized learning experiences, which are key factors contributing to the expansion of tutoring services worldwide.
One of the most significant growth factors for the K-12 tutoring market is the increasing competition among students to achieve academic excellence. With education being a critical determinant of future success, parents and guardians are investing heavily in supplementary education services to ensure their children excel academically. The pressure to gain admission into prestigious universities has also fueled the demand for tutoring services, particularly in subjects such as mathematics and science, which are crucial for competitive exams.
Another crucial driver is the growing awareness of the benefits of personalized learning. Traditional classroom settings often follow a one-size-fits-all approach, which may not cater to the individual learning needs of every student. Tutoring provides a more tailored educational experience, allowing students to learn at their own pace and focus on areas where they need the most help. This personalized approach not only improves academic performance but also boosts students' confidence and motivation.
The integration of technology in education has also played a pivotal role in the growth of the K-12 tutoring market. The advent of online tutoring platforms has made it easier for students to access quality educational resources from the comfort of their homes. Online tutoring offers flexibility in scheduling, a wide range of subject choices, and access to expert tutors from around the world. This mode of tutoring has become increasingly popular, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has accelerated the adoption of digital learning solutions.
Regionally, the K-12 tutoring market is witnessing substantial growth in Asia Pacific, particularly in countries like China and India, where the education system is highly competitive. The North American market is also expanding due to the high disposable income of households and the increasing adoption of online tutoring platforms. Europe and Latin America show steady growth trajectories, driven by government initiatives to enhance educational standards and the increasing popularity of private tutoring. The Middle East & Africa region is gradually catching up, with a growing focus on educational reforms and investments in the education sector.
In-person tutoring continues to hold a significant share in the K-12 tutoring market, driven by its traditional approach and the personalized attention it offers students. Many parents prefer in-person tutoring because it allows for direct interaction between the tutor and the student, which can be more effective in addressing specific learning challenges. The face-to-face engagement helps in building a rapport, enabling tutors to better understand the student's needs and tailor their teaching methods accordingly. Despite the rise of online tutoring, in-person tutoring remains popular, especially for subjects that require hands-on learning and immediate feedback.
Online tutoring, on the other hand, has experienced remarkable growth, particularly in recent years. The convenience and flexibility it offers make it an attractive option for many students and parents. Online tutoring platforms provide access to a wide range of educational resources and expert tutors from across the globe, making it possible for students to receive high-quality education irrespective of their geographical location. The use of advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning has further enhanced the effectiveness of online tutoring by providing personalized learning experiences and real-time progress tracking.
Hybrid tutoring, which combines in-person and online tutoring, is emerging as a popular trend in the K-12 tutoring market. This approach leverages the strengths of both methodologies, offering the flexibility of online learning while maintaining the personal touch of in-person tutoring. Hybrid tutoring can be particularly beneficial in cases where students need regular in-person sessions for certain subjects while leveraging onli
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The University Statistics (EU) and School Activity Statistics (EAE) operations, of a census and annual nature, allow the knowledge of the educational system and its evolution both in higher studies (third grade) and in previous studies (primary and secondary) respectively, providing the official bodies and society in general with the main figures of the education system. All schools that provide formal education included in the Register of Educational Centers of the Basque Government, whether in the public or private sector, are analysed.
Facebook
TwitterThis dataset provides a comprehensive overview of the QS World University Rankings for the year 2025, encompassing data on over 1,500 universities from 105 education systems worldwide. It includes institutional characteristics, regional classification, and a variety of performance indicators that reflect academic reputation, employability, sustainability, and internationalization.
The dataset includes institutional rankings for both 2025 and 2024, alongside scores and ranks for numerous metrics used to evaluate universities. These metrics offer insight into academic quality, research output, international engagement, and employment outcomes.
| Column Name | Description |
|---|---|
| RANK_2025 | University’s overall rank in the 2025 QS World University Rankings |
| RANK_2024 | University’s overall rank in the 2024 QS Rankings |
| Institution_Name | Name of the university or institution |
| Location | Country in which the institution is located |
| Region | Global region (e.g., Europe, Asia, North America) |
| SIZE | Size classification of the institution (e.g., S, M, L, XL) |
| FOCUS | Focus type (e.g., Comprehensive, Focused) |
| RES. | Research intensity (e.g., Very High, High) |
| STATUS | Status of the institution (e.g., Public, Private) |
| Academic_Reputation_Score | Score based on global academic reputation survey |
| Academic_Reputation_Rank | Rank based on academic reputation |
| Employer_Reputation_Score | Score based on global employer reputation survey |
| Employer_Reputation_Rank | Rank based on employer reputation |
| Faculty_Student_Score | Score reflecting student-to-faculty ratio |
| Faculty_Student_Rank | Rank based on faculty-student ratio |
| Citations_per_Faculty_Score | Score reflecting research impact (citations per faculty) |
| Citations_per_Faculty_Rank | Rank based on citations per faculty |
| International_Faculty_Score | Score representing international diversity of faculty |
| International_Faculty_Rank | Rank based on international faculty presence |
| International_Students_Score | Score representing diversity of international students |
| International_Students_Rank | Rank based on international student ratio |
| International_Research_Network_Score | Score based on global research collaboration |
| International_Research_Network_Rank | Rank based on international research partnerships |
| Employment_Outcomes_Score | Score reflecting graduates’ employability and success |
| Employment_Outcomes_Rank | Rank based on employment outcomes |
| Sustainability_Score | Score reflecting sustainability initiatives and performance |
| Sustainability_Rank | Rank based on sustainability measures |
| Overall_Score | Final composite score used to determine the university's ranking |
This dataset is suitable for: - Higher Education Analysis: Track university performance across global metrics. - Student Decision-Making: Support students choosing top-ranked institutions. - Policy & Strategy: Aid education policymakers and institutional strategists in benchmarking and improvement planning. - Data Visualization: Ideal for visual dashboards, maps, and interactive reports on global university performance.
Facebook
TwitterEstimated average scores and percent distribution of 15-year-old students, science, by proficiency level, Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), Canada, provinces and participating countries, Council of Ministers of Education Canada (CMEC). This table is included in Section C: Elementary-secondary education: Student achievement of the Pan Canadian Education Indicators Program (PCEIP). PCEIP draws from a wide variety of data sources to provide information on the school-age population, elementary, secondary and postsecondary education, transitions, education finance and labour market outcomes. The program presents indicators for all of Canada, the provinces, the territories, as well as selected international comparisons and comparisons over time. PCEIP is an ongoing initiative of the Canadian Education Statistics Council, a partnership between Statistics Canada and the Council of Ministers of Education, Canada that provides a set of statistical measures on education systems in Canada.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The University Statistics (EU) and School Activity Statistics (EAE) operations, of a census and annual nature, allow the knowledge of the educational system and its evolution both in higher studies (third grade) and in previous studies (primary and secondary) respectively, providing the official bodies and society in general with the main figures of the education system. All schools that provide formal education included in the Register of Educational Centers of the Basque Government, whether in the public or private sector, are analysed.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The University Statistics (EU) and School Activity Statistics (EAE) operations, of a census and annual nature, allow the knowledge of the educational system and its evolution both in higher studies (third grade) and in previous studies (primary and secondary) respectively, providing the official bodies and society in general with the main figures of the education system. All schools that provide formal education included in the Register of Educational Centers of the Basque Government, whether in the public or private sector, are analysed.
Facebook
TwitterThis statistic represents the ranking in the Gulf Cooperation Council region for quality of the education system in 2018, by country. During the measured time period, the rank of Qatar was ***** out of 140 countries for the quality of the education system.