Number and percent of respondents indicating how often they use online health sources when making decisions about their health.

eHealth makes use of information and communication technologies (ICT) to improve health. In the digital age, the use of eHealth applications and other health-related applications has gained popularity, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result of the pandemic, many uncertainties have arisen, causing stress and affecting the mental health of many skilled workers in the digital industry, particularly in the ICT, computing, and creative media industries. eHealth applications have the potential to benefit people's health. As a prerequisite for effective implementation of eHealth for mental wellness (EHMW), this paper examines the acceptance of EHMW among digital workers in Malaysia. Date: 2021-11-05

Two surveys were sent out, within and outside of a large European research consortium, to investigate preference for value propositions of eHealth ecosystems. Different value propositions were presented (10 in the internal and 12 in the external survey) and rated by the participants on their feasibility and importance. Some demographics, mainly concerning the participants work environment, were collected to allow analysis on differences between certain industry types. Date Submitted: 2022-03-11

According to this survey conducted in 2019, the biggest e-health trends for the upcoming years for most health facilities were related to patient health records, health information exchange with external players, and the provision of telemedicine. Pre-COVID, ** percent of respondents surveyed in health facilities stated that patient health records were the biggest e-health trend for 2020 to 2023.

According to this survey conducted in 2019, the biggest priorities for most health facilities related to IT security and Electronic Medical Records (EMR). Pre-COVID, ** percent of respondents surveyed in health facilities stated that IT security was the biggest eHealth priority.

Number and percent of respondents indicating how common they think each type of patient-provider relationship is, and which model they want.

Raw data of a survey on around 1800 acute hospitals to measure the level of deployment and take-up of ICT and eHealth applications. Coverage of EU28 Member States plus Iceland and Norvay. Interview realised during winter 2012/2013. A previous data collection was conducted in automn 2010 under DG INFSO SMART study 2009/022.

Objective: There has been substantial growth in eHealth over the past decade, driven by expectations of improved healthcare system performance. Despite substantial eHealth investment, little is known about the monitoring and evaluation strategies for gauging progress in terms of eHealth availability and use. This scoping review aims to map the existing literature and depict the predominant approaches and methodological recommendations to national and regional monitoring and evaluation of eHealth availability and use in order to advance national strategies for monitoring and evaluating eHealth. Methods: Peer-reviewed and grey literature on monitoring and evaluation of eHealth availability and use, published between January 1st, 2009, to March 11th, 2019, were eligible for inclusion. 2,354 publications were identified, and 36 publications were included after full-text review. Data on publication type (e.g. empirical research), country, level (national or regional), publication year, method (e.g. survey), and domain (e.g., Provider-centric electronic record) was charted. Results: The majority of publications monitored availability alone or applied a combination of availability and use measures. Surveys were the most common data collection method (used in 86% of the publications). OECD, European Commission, Canada Health Infoway, and WHO have developed comprehensive eHealth monitoring and evaluation methodology recommendations. Discussion: Establishing continuous national eHealth monitoring and evaluation, based on international approaches and recommendations, could improve the ability for cross-country benchmarking and learning. This scoping review provides an overview of the predominant approaches and recommendations to national and regional monitoring and evaluating eHealth and thereby provides a starting point for developing national eHealth monitoring strategies.

The ODA project in Finland focused on building digital social and health services to support self-care. This survey studied the expectations and experiences of social and health care professionals regarding the digitalised services provided by the project. Most respondents were health professionals working in the municipalities, social and health care areas, and hospital districts participating in the project. Similar data collected from managers/directors are available in FSD3320.

The ODA digital services make use of information entered into the system by professionals and of information entered by patients/clients themselves on their personal well-being. For people who are willing to use digitalised services for their own self-care, the services provide well-being check-ups and training, assessment of symptoms and well-being, and care plans for those in need of long-term care or services. ODA is part of the Competent Workforce for the Future (COPE) project, funded by the Academy of Finland.

Survey questions investigated whether the respondents felt they had received sufficient information of the future ODA services, their views on the services, expectations of changes service implementation would bring, and how the digital services would affect their work, professional role and patients/clients. Benefits and challenges were estimated, as well as expectations on how the implementation would go in practise. The respondents were also asked whether they had participated in the planning and developing of the services.

Background variables included the respondent's age group, gender, occupation, as well as the type of organisation and municipality or district where they worked.

This statistic displays the result of a survey where eHealth professionals from Europe in 2019 were asked what they see as the biggest eHealth trend within the next *** to three years. According to the results, ** percent of respondents think the biggest trend in near future will be the use of patient owned health data, while ** percent believe incentives by providers for using telemedicine services will become a big trend.

The global e-health market size was USD 457.78 billion in 2024 & is projected to grow from USD 568.70 billion in 2025 to USD 1,517.43 billion by 2033.
Report Scope:

Demographic characteristics of individuals participating in an interview (N = 12).

Two surveys were sent out, within and outside of a large European research consortium, to investigate preference for value propositions of eHealth ecosystems. Different value propositions were presented (10 in the internal and 12 in the external survey) and rated by the participants on their feasibility and importance. Some demographics, mainly concerning the participants work environment, were collected to allow analysis on differences between certain industry types. Date Submitted: 2022-04-01

This statistic displays the result of a survey where eHealth professionals in Europe were asked to evaluate the main eHealth challenges for healthcare providers in 2021. In this year, 41 percent of respondents say that receiving funding is the biggest challenge for healthcare providers, while 32 percent of respondents found IT security and data privacy challenging.

This statistic displays the result of a survey where eHealth professionals in Europe in 2021 were asked which European country they consider to be the leading role model in eHealth innovation. According to the results, ** percent of respondents believe Estonia is the leading country for eHealth innovation, followed by Denmark which received ** percent of responses.

This statistic displays the results of a survey where eHealth professionals from Switzerland in 2019 were asked what they see as the biggest eHealth trends within the next two to three years. According to the results, ** percent of respondents from Switzerland think health information exchange with external providers will be the biggest trend in near future, while use of patient owned health records received ** percent of responses.

Themes derived from participant feedback about five key features of an integrated eHealth intervention.

This statistic displays the result of a survey where eHealth professionals from selected European countries in 2021 were asked how the environment for eHealth innovation and investment in their country will develop over the next twelve months. According to the results, *** percent of respondents from Finland believe that eHealth prospects in their country will improve over the next year.

This statistic illustrates the share of eHealth tracker/smart watch owners in France in 2024. The results were sorted by age. As of **********, some ** percent of French respondents aged 18 to 29 years stated that they own eHealth trackers. The survey was conducted among ***** respondents. Access millions of exclusive survey results with Statista Consumer Insights.

Background: The unequal access, challenges and outcomes related to using technology have created the digital divide, which leads to health inequalities. The aim of this study was to apply the Ophelia (Optimizing Health Literacy and Access) process, a widely used systematic approach to whole of community co-design, to the digital context to generate solutions to improve health and equity outcomes.Methods: This was a mixed method study. A cross-sectional survey was undertaken at 3 health organizations in Victoria, Australia using the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ) as a needs assessment tool. Cluster analysis was conducted to identify subgroups with varying eHealth literacy needs. These data, combined with semi-structured interviews with clients, were used to generate vignettes representing different eHealth literacy profiles. The vignettes were presented at co-design workshops with clients and health professionals to generate solutions for digital health services improvement. Expert validation and proof-of-concept testing was explored through mapping the process against Ophelia guiding principles.Results: The cluster analyses identified 8 to 9 clusters with different profiles of eHealth literacy needs, with 4 to 6 vignettes developed to represent the eHealth literacy strengths and weaknesses of clients at each of the 3 sites. A total of 32, 43, and 32 solutions across 10 strategies were co-created based on ideas grounded in local expertise and experiences. Apart from digital solutions, non-digital solutions were frequently recommended as a strategy to address eHealth literacy needs. Expert validation identified at least half of the ideas were very important and feasible, while most of the guiding principles of the Ophelia process were successfully applied.Conclusion: By harnessing collective creativity through co-design, the Ophelia process has been shown to assist the development of solutions with the potential to improve health and equity outcomes in the digital context. Implementation of the solutions is needed to provide further evidence of the impact of the process. The suggested inclusion of non-digital solutions revealed through the co-design process reminds health organizations and policymakers that solutions should be flexible enough to suit individual needs. As such, taking a co-design approach to digital health initiatives will assist in preventing the widening of health inequalities.