Download Employee Travel Excel SheetThis dataset contains information about the employee travel expenses for the year 2021. Details are provided on the employee (name, title, department), the travel (dates, location, purpose) and the cost (expenses, recoveries). Expenses are broken down in separate tabs by Quarter (Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4). Updated quarterly when expenses are prepared. Expenses for other years are available in separate datasets.

Allow DHS users to review their HR related information such as Pay, Leave, Heath Insurance, Life Insurance, Flexible Spending Account, Travel, W-2. Self service option allows users to maintain the following information: direct deposit, Health Insurance, W-4, Financial Allotments, Home Address, Savings Bond, State Tax Withholding, Thrift Savings Plan. Financial disclosure support allows users to maintain and print Forms SF-278 and OGE-450 online.

It is important to identify any barriers in recruitment, hiring, and employee retention practices that might discourage any segment of our population from applying for positions or continuing employment at the City of Tempe. This information will provide better awareness for outreach efforts and other strategies to attract, hire, and retain a diverse workforce.This page provides data for the Employee Vertical Diversity performance measure. The performance measure dashboard is available at 2.20 Employee Vertical Diversity. Additional InformationSource:PeopleSoft HCM, Maricopa County Labor Market Census DataContact: Lawrence LaVictoireContact E-Mail: lawrence_lavicotoire@tempe.govData Source Type: Excel, PDFPreparation Method: PeopleSoft query and PDF are moved to a pre-formatted Excel spreadsheet.Publish Frequency: Every six monthsPublish Method: ManualData Dictionary

This dataset comes from the Biennial City of Tempe Employee Survey questions related to employee support of work-related needs. Survey respondents are asked to rate their level of agreement on a scale of 5 to 1, where 5 means "Strongly Agree" and 1 means "Strongly Disagree" (without "don't know" as an option).Participation in the survey is voluntary and confidential. This page provides data for the Employee Work-Related Needs performance measure. Please note that in 2022, due to strategic transformational changes, the Strategic Management and Diversity Office was reorganized into the Strategic Management and Innovation Office and the Office of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion. The performance measure dashboard is available at 2.25 Employee Work Related Needs. Additional InformationSource: paper and digital survey submissionsContact: Wydale HolmesContact E-Mail: wydale_holmes@tempe.govData Source Type: ExcelPreparation Method: Extracted from employee survey resultsPublish Frequency: BiennialPublish Method: ManualData Dictionary

Download Employee Vehicle Personal Use Excel SheetThis dataset lists the employee name and taxable benefit for personal use of City of Greater Sudbury Vehicle as travel expenses for the year 2020. Expenses are broken down in separate tabs by Quarter (Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4). Data for other years is available in separate datasets. Updated quarterly when expenses are prepared.

Safety Data Sheet Management Market size was valued at USD 14.9 Billion in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 25.4 Billion by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 7.8 % during the forecast period 2024-2031.

Stringent Regulatory Requirements: Increasing global regulations and compliance standards for hazardous materials drive the need for efficient SDS management systems.

Workplace Safety Concerns: Workplace safety is a paramount concern for businesses across diverse industries. An increasing focus on employee health and well-being has led companies to adopt stringent safety measures. Safety Data Sheets (SDS) are integral to these measures, providing detailed information on the properties and handling of hazardous chemicals. Effective SDS management systems ensure that employees are well-informed about the risks and safe handling procedures associated with chemicals they work with. This not only helps in complying with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards but also mitigates the financial and reputational risks associated with workplace accidents. The growing emphasis on creating safer work environments has driven companies to seek comprehensive SDS management solutions, thus propelling the market forward. Growth in Chemical Industry: The chemical industry is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing demand from sectors such as pharmaceuticals, agriculture, and manufacturing. As the volume and variety of chemicals being produced and used escalate, so does the complexity of managing their safety data. Regulatory bodies mandate that up-to-date and accurate SDS be provided and maintained for chemicals, ensuring safe usage, handling, and disposal. Companies in the chemical industry are consequently investing in advanced SDS management systems to streamline compliance with these regulations, manage inventory, and ensure that safety information is readily accessible. This sector’s expansion significantly contributes to the growth of the SDS management market. Technological Advancements: Technological advancements in digital solutions have revolutionized the SDS management landscape. Innovations like cloud-based platforms, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and mobile applications have made it easier and more efficient to manage, access, and update safety data sheets. These technologies offer real-time updates, enhanced accuracy, and improved accessibility, thereby improving compliance and reducing administrative burdens. AI can automate the extraction and updating of safety data, while mobile applications allow for on-the-go access to critical safety information. These technological advancements not only enhance operational efficiency but also provide a competitive edge to businesses, making them a driving force in the market. Environmental Regulations: Environmental regulations across the globe are becoming increasingly stringent, compelling organizations to adopt robust compliance mechanisms. Regulatory frameworks such as the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) for Classification and Labelling of Chemicals necessitate that businesses maintain accurate and up-to-date SDS. Compliance with these regulations is critical to avoid hefty fines, legal repercussions, and potential operational shutdowns. The increasing enforcement of environmental laws and standards drives the demand for efficient SDS management systems that can handle complex regulations and ensure seamless compliance. As a result, regulatory pressure acts as a significant market driver, pushing organizations to invest in advanced SDS management solutions. Globalization of Supply Chains: International trade and complex supply chains require standardized and accessible SDS documentation across borders. Risk Management: Companies are increasingly adopting SDS management systems to mitigate risks associated with hazardous materials and ensure swift response in emergencies. Cost Efficiency: Automated SDS management systems reduce administrative burden, minimize errors, and save costs associated with manual data handling. Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability: Growing emphasis on corporate social responsibility and sustainability practices encourages companies to adopt comprehensive SDS management systems. Digital Transformation: The shift towards digital transformation in various industries propels the adoption of electronic SDS management solutions.

Direct Deposit, Tax management, financial allotments

Registration system and data for pooled plan providers under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and Internal Revenue Code. The Form PR includes information about the pooled plan provider, any affiliated service providers, and any criminal or civil proceedings related to the provider or its employees. The form must be filed electronically with the Department of Labor before the provider can begin operating pooled employer plans.

🇩🇪 독일

Graph and download economic data for Balance Sheet: Total Employees (Full-Time Equivalent) (QBPBSTEMP) from Q1 1984 to Q1 2025 about balance sheet, full-time, employment, and USA.

The dataset consists of closed cases that resulted in penalty assessments by EBSA since 2000. This data provides information on EBSA's enforcement programs to enforce ERISA's Form 5500 Annual Return/Report filing requirement focusing on deficient filers, late filers and non-filers.

Dataset tables listing: EBSA Data Dictionary, EBSA Metadata and EBSA OCATS.

Sweden Number of Bankruptcy: Limited Companies: Number Employee data was reported at 256.000 Unit in Oct 2018. This records an increase from the previous number of 212.000 Unit for Sep 2018. Sweden Number of Bankruptcy: Limited Companies: Number Employee data is updated monthly, averaging 244.000 Unit from Jan 1994 (Median) to Oct 2018, with 298 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 696.000 Unit in Mar 1994 and a record low of 106.000 Unit in Aug 2008. Sweden Number of Bankruptcy: Limited Companies: Number Employee data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Statistics Sweden. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Sweden – Table SE.O022: Number of Bankruptcy: by Legal Form and Employees.

Sweden Number of Bankruptcy: Individual Company: Number Employee data was reported at 18.000 Unit in Oct 2018. This records an increase from the previous number of 12.000 Unit for Sep 2018. Sweden Number of Bankruptcy: Individual Company: Number Employee data is updated monthly, averaging 29.000 Unit from Jan 1994 (Median) to Oct 2018, with 298 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 113.000 Unit in Nov 1995 and a record low of 2.000 Unit in Nov 2013. Sweden Number of Bankruptcy: Individual Company: Number Employee data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Statistics Sweden. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Sweden – Table SE.O022: Number of Bankruptcy: by Legal Form and Employees.

Safety Data Sheet (SDS) Management Market Outlook

The global Safety Data Sheet (SDS) Management market size was estimated to be USD 1.2 billion in 2023 and is anticipated to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 10.5% from 2024 to 2032, reaching a market size of approximately USD 2.9 billion by the end of the forecast period. The growth in this market can be attributed to the increasing regulatory requirements and compliance standards across various industries, along with the rising awareness about workplace safety. These factors are compelling organizations to adopt efficient SDS management systems to ensure the safety of their employees and the environment.

One of the primary growth factors driving the SDS Management market is the stringent regulations and compliance mandates imposed by governmental bodies globally. Industries such as chemicals, oil and gas, and healthcare are heavily regulated due to the hazardous nature of the materials they handle. Regulatory bodies like the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) in the United States and the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation, and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) in Europe mandate the proper management of safety data sheets to ensure safe handling, transport, and disposal of hazardous chemicals. Non-compliance with these regulations can lead to severe penalties, making it essential for companies to adopt SDS management solutions. These solutions not only help in maintaining compliance but also streamline the entire process of managing safety data sheets, thus minimizing the risk of human error.

The increasing focus on workplace safety and the well-being of employees is another significant factor propelling the growth of the SDS Management market. As companies become more conscious of their social responsibilities, there is a growing emphasis on creating a safe and healthy work environment. SDS management systems play a crucial role in this aspect by providing accurate and up-to-date information on hazardous substances, ensuring that employees are well-informed about potential risks. Additionally, advancements in technology have led to the development of sophisticated software solutions that offer real-time access to safety data sheets, allowing employees to make informed decisions and take appropriate safety measures promptly. This technological evolution is further driving the adoption of SDS management solutions across various industry verticals.

The global shift towards digitalization and the integration of advanced technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) in SDS management solutions are creating new growth opportunities in the market. These technologies help in automating the process of data collection, analysis, and reporting, reducing the time and effort required for managing safety data sheets. Moreover, cloud-based SDS management solutions offer scalability and flexibility, enabling organizations to manage safety data sheets effectively, irrespective of their size or geographical location. As more companies embrace digital transformation, the demand for efficient and cloud-based SDS management solutions is expected to rise significantly, contributing to market growth.

Component Analysis

The SDS Management market can be segmented into two primary components: software and services. The software segment encompasses solutions that are designed to streamline the process of managing safety data sheets electronically. These solutions typically include features such as automated data entry, real-time access to SDS information, and compliance management tools. The growing adoption of these software solutions is driven by their ability to enhance operational efficiency, reduce manual errors, and ensure compliance with regulatory standards. As industries continue to embrace digital transformation, the demand for robust SDS management software is expected to rise, contributing significantly to market growth.

The services segment of the SDS Management market includes consulting, implementation, and support services that help organizations optimize their SDS management processes. These services are crucial for companies that lack the expertise or resources to manage safety data sheets effectively. Consulting services assist organizations in assessing their current SDS management practices and developing strategies to improve them, while implementation services focus on integrating SDS management solutions into existing systems. Additionally, ongoing support services ensure that organizations can efficiently manage safety data sheets and remain compliant with evolving regulations. The growing c

The Safety Data Sheet (SDS) Management market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing regulatory pressures, heightened awareness of workplace safety, and the adoption of digital solutions for efficient SDS handling. The market, currently estimated at $2 billion in 2025, is projected to achieve a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 12% from 2025 to 2033, reaching approximately $6 billion by 2033. This expansion is fueled by several key factors. Firstly, stringent government regulations worldwide mandate comprehensive SDS management, pushing companies to invest in sophisticated software and services to ensure compliance. Secondly, the rising incidence of workplace accidents and the associated litigation costs are compelling businesses to prioritize employee safety and proactively manage SDS information. Finally, the shift towards digitalization is significantly impacting the industry, with cloud-based SDS management systems offering improved accessibility, collaboration, and data management capabilities. However, market growth faces some challenges. Initial investment costs for new software and training can be substantial, potentially hindering smaller businesses' adoption. Data security and integration complexities with existing enterprise systems remain concerns. Furthermore, maintaining up-to-date SDS information across various locations and languages can be a significant undertaking. Nevertheless, the increasing benefits of efficient SDS management, including reduced operational costs, enhanced risk mitigation, and improved employee safety, are expected to outweigh these challenges, ensuring sustained growth of the market throughout the forecast period. Key players like SafeTec, Global Safety Management (GSM), HazCommpliance, ERA, SiteHawk, 3E Company, and CloudSDS are strategically positioned to capitalize on these market trends through product innovation and expansion of their service offerings.

With the acceleration of the process of social aging, the re-employment of middle-aged and elderly people has gradually attracted the attention of society. Due to the relatively low barrier to entry, the hotel industry is favored by middle-aged and elderly people who are re-employed. This study analyzes the impacts of the three-dimensional capital on the job performance of middle-aged and elderly employees and investigates how organizational support and age discrimination moderate the effect of job satisfaction on job performance. A self-administered questionnaire was distributed to 400 hotel employees using convenience sampling. First, the three-dimensional capital has a positive impact on the job performance of both middle-aged and elderly employees; second, Job satisfaction has a mediating effect between the three-dimensional capital and the job performance of middle-aged and elderly employees; third, perceived organizational support positively moderates the effect of job satisfaction on job performance of middle-aged and elderly employees, and age discrimination perception negatively moderates the effect of job satisfaction on job performance of middle-aged and elderly employees. Theoretical and practical implications, as well as limitations and future research directions, are discussed.

Health and Life insurance management

FormFactor reported 2.24K in Employees for its fiscal year ending in December of 2024. Data for FormFactor | FORM - Employees Total Number including historical, tables and charts were last updated by Trading Economics this last August in 2025.

This is the summation over all time of weekly data from the Google Analytics tag for the Open Data Portal at OpenData.fcgov.com. The only datasets included here are those with titles matching 'Fort Collins City Employee Earnings'.

Analytics shown are presumed to be non-City-employees, as these data come from computers external to the City network. Each day starting at the first day for which there are data is included, and the URL is either a specific page or "all", specifying that every page in the domain is included. Specific-page URLs are filtered to the main Portal page or data assets, so "all" may capture more pages than specified individually.

The Workplace Employment Relations Survey (WERS) is a national survey of the state of employment relations and working life inside British workplaces. The 1998, 2004 and 2011 surveys (WERS98, WERS 2004, WERS 2011) are the fourth, fifth and sixth in the series, respectively, earlier surveys having been carried out in 1980, 1984 and 1990. Prior to 1998, the series was known as the Workplace Industrial Relations Survey (WIRS), the name being changed in order to better reflect the content of the current survey. The UK Data Archive hold the WIRS/WERS series from 1980 onwards under GN 33176.

The purpose of each survey in the WERS series has been to provide large-scale, statistically reliable evidence about a broad range of industrial relations and employment practices across almost every sector of the economy in Great Britain. This evidence is collected with several objectives in mind. It aims to provide a mapping of employment relations practices in workplaces across Great Britain, monitor changes in those practices over time, inform policy development and permit an informed assessment of the effects of public policy, and bring about a greater understanding of employment relations as well as of the labour market.

To that end, the cross-section element of WERS98 and WERS 2004 collected information from managers with responsibility for employment relations or personnel matters; trade union or employee representatives; and employees themselves. Thus, the surveys included the Cross-Section Survey of Managers (MQ), the Cross-Section Survey of Employee Representatives (ERQ), and the Cross-Section Survey of Employees (SEQ). The cross-section surveys in 2004 also included a Financial Performance Questionnaire (FPQ), which examined financial performance of the establishment over the 12 months previous to the survey. (Access to the FPQ data, alongside region identifiers and industry codes for the MQ and panel data, was initially restricted until April 2007, when they were deposited as part of the second edition of End User Licence (EUL) SN 5294.) The panel element of WERS 2004 includes the Screening Questionnaire and the Survey of Managers (comprising the Basic Workforce Data Sheet and the Management Interview).

The 2011 WERS sample consisted of a panel sample containing all the workplaces that had taken part in the 2004 WERS and were still in existence in 2011, and a stratified random sample of establishments drawn from the Inter-Departmental Business Register (IDBR) in August 2010 (the fresh cross-section sample). The key design innovation of the 2011 WERS was the integration of the two elements so that workplaces in the panel sample were eligible for all four components of WERS 2011. Weights were devised to enable the panel sample to be combined with the fresh sample to form a combined cross-sectionally representative sample. The WERS 2011 has four components: a Survey of Managers comprising the Employee Profile Questionnaire (EPQ) and the Management Questionnaire (MQ); a Survey of Worker Representatives (WRQ); a Survey of Employees (SEQ); and a Financial Performance Questionnaire (FPQ) which detailed the financial performance of trading sector establishments in the 12 months before the survey.

Secure Access Dataset:
The Secure Access version of the study includes both the cross-section and panel surveys conducted for WERS98 and WERS 2004. The panel element for 2004 forms Wave 2 of the 1998-2004 panel survey. Wave 1 comprised the cross-sectional managers' survey conducted for WERS98. The study also includes all the WERS 2011 data

The Secure Access version includes additional variables not included in the EUL versions (see SNs 5294, 3955 and 7226). Extra variables that can be found in the Secure Access versions but not in the EUL versions relate to 1) Inter-Departmental Business Register reference numbers for businesses who have consented to the linking of WERS data to other data sources, 2) postcodes, and 3) in 2011 the Financial Performance Questionnaire data are available along with some other more detailed variables.

Geographical references: postcodes
The postcodes available in the 1998 data are pseudo-anonymised postcodes. The real postcodes were not available for this year due to the potential risk of identification of the observations. However, these replacement postcodes retain the inherent nested characteristics of real postcodes, and will allow researchers to aggregate observations to other geographic units, e.g. wards, super output areas, etc. The postcodes available in the 2004 and 2011 data are real postcodes.

Linking to other business studies
These data contain Inter-Departmental Business Register reference numbers. These are anonymous but unique reference numbers assigned to business organisations. Their inclusion allows researchers to combine different business survey sources together. Researchers may consider applying for other business data to assist their research.

Additional data in 2011
The 2011 data includes an additional dataset, the Financial Performance Questionnaire, which details the financial performance of trading sector establishments in the 12 months before the survey. There are also region identifiers and the country in which the workplace is located can be identified. In addition industry classification is coded to below the section-level of the Standard Industrial Classification.

Related UK Data Archive studies:
The EUL version of the WERS Cross-Section Survey, 2004 and Panel Survey, 1998-2004; Wave 2 study is held under SN 5294. The EUL version of the WERS Cross-Section Survey 1998 is held under SN 3955. The EUL version of the WERS 2011 is held under SN 7226. Further details and links to these and other WERS studies available under a standard EUL can be found on the Workplace Employee Relations Survey list of datasets webpage.

Related Websites:
The WERS sponsors have established the 2011 Workplace Employment Relations Study: Information and Advice user support website for users of the WERS 2011 data. The site includes provision for users to contact the WERS research team with queries about the data.

Further information about the WERS series is also provided on the gov.uk Workplace Employment Relations Study (WERS) webpage.

For Secure Lab projects applying for access to this study as well as to SN 6697 Business Structure Database and/or SN 7683 Business Structure Database Longitudinal, only postcode-free versions of the data will be made available.

Latest edition:
For the fifth edition (August 2018), the pseudo-anonymised postcodes (NEW_PC) included in the data file 'wers2004_management_idbr_restricted' have been replaced with real postcodes (PCD2). The file contains only those cases where the respondent gave consent for data linkage (MLINKDAT=yes).