This report presents the latest statistics on type and volume of tribunal cases received, disposed of and outstanding and the number of Gender Recognition Certificates applied for and granted in April to June 2020. Additionally this report includes an annual set of statistics on the Employment and Employment Appeal Tribunals for 2019/20.
This report presents the latest statistics on type and volume of tribunal cases received, disposed of and outstanding and the number of Gender Recognition Certificates applied for and granted in April to June 2024. Additionally this report includes one statistical notice covering Detained Immigration Appeals; as well as an annual set of statistics on the Employment and Employment Appeal Tribunals for the financial year 2023/24.
http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/open-government-licencehttp://reference.data.gov.uk/id/open-government-licence
This report presents annual statistical information on Employment Tribunals (ET) and Employment Appeal Tribunals (EAT) in Great Britain.
Source agency: Justice
Designation: Official Statistics not designated as National Statistics
Language: English
Alternative title: Employment Tribunal and EAT Statistics
Open Government Licence 3.0http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
License information was derived automatically
đŹđ§ ìê”
Open Government Licence 3.0http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
License information was derived automatically
The bulletin presents the latest statistics on type and volume of tribunal cases received, disposed of and outstanding and the number of Gender Recognition Certificates applied for and granted.
The bulletin focuses on information on receipts (i.e. cases received by HMCTS), the outcome of cases by category (e.g. cases disposed of at hearing) and the caseload outstanding (snapshot of live cases at a specific point in time) for the three largest tribunals: Employment, Immigration and Asylum, and Social Security and Child Support. Additional data are available on timeliness, jurisdiction, Employment Tribunal fees, smaller tribunals, Employment Appeal Tribunal and regional receipts for the Employment Tribunal (management information).
Annual data are published as follows: * Employment Tribunal and Employment Appeal Tribunal annual statistics are published in September; these include information on representation of claimants, compensation and costs awarded in the Employment Tribunal for the financial year. * Data from the Special Educational Needs and Disability tribunals covering the academic year are published in December. Further breakdowns include information on the number of appeals registered by type and nature of special education need, and outcomes. * The number of adjournments and postponements by jurisdiction are published annually in June, along with the number of judicial salaried and fee-paid sittings by jurisdiction.
In addition to monitoring tribunal workloads and timeliness, they are used to assist in the development, monitoring and evaluation of tribunal related policy in collaboration with other Government departments, e.g. DWP, BEIS and Home Office.
In 2022, there were 482,789 outstanding employment tribunals in England and Wales, compared with 506,896 in the previous year.
In 2022/23,14,632 equal pay tribunals took place in Great Britain, compared with 24,689 in 2019/20, and 8,509 in 2020/21. Employers in the UK are obliged to pay men and women equal pay for equal work, with employees entitled to make an equal-pay claim when this is not the case. If claims are not resolved internally, or mediated by a conciliation process, the claims are then assessed by an employment tribunal.
Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.
The Survey of Employment Tribunal Applications (SETA) series aims to provide information on the characteristics of the parties in, and the key features of, employment tribunal cases.
The headline aims of the 2018 study were to:
The first SETA was undertaken in 1987, with subsequent surveys undertaken in 1992, 1998, 2003, 2008 and 2013. The survey methodology used in 2018 was very similar to that used in 2013.
A total of 2,663 interviews were carried out; 1,373 interviews with claimants and 1,290 with employers. The average interview length in the claimant survey was 30 minutes and in the employer survey 26 minutes.
Further information may be found on the gov.uk Survey of Employment Tribunal Applications 2018 webpage.
This is the seventh survey in a series dating back to 1987. The 1998, 2003, 2008 and 2013 surveys (SNs 4894, 6714, 5022 and 7727 respectively) are available at the UK Data Service.
Open Government Licence 3.0http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
License information was derived automatically
This report presents comprehensive statistics on the judicial selection process and recommendations for Employment Tribunal Members. This exercise ran from August 2009 to January 2010.
Most judicial recruitment exercises are run by the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC). However, Employment Tribunal Members are not listed in schedule 14 of the Constitutional Reform Act 2006, and this exercise was therefore able to be run by the Tribunals.
Source agency: Justice
Designation: Official Statistics not designated as National Statistics
Language: English
Alternative title: Statistics of the Employment Tribunals selection and recommendations for appointment exercise, showing diversity
The Survey of Employment Tribunal Applications, 2008 (SETA2008) is the fifth in the series. The first SETA was undertaken in 1987, with subsequent surveys undertaken in 1992, 1998 and 2003. The series aims to provide information on the characteristics of the parties in, and key features of, Employment Tribunal cases.
Additional aims of the SETA 2008 were:
2008 is the latest in a series dating back to 1987
Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.
This series aims to provide information on the characteristics of the parties in, and the key features of, employment tribunal cases.
The headline aims of the 2013 study were to:
This statistic shows the share of companies which are offering ethical employment law training in 2017, by topic. The results of the survey revealed that 56 percent of the respondents stated that they are offering ethical employment law training in workplace harassment.
This dataset was created by Manuel Juarez
The Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) Program is a Federal-State cooperative program between the U.S. Department of Laborâs Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) and the California EDDâs Labor Market Information Division (LMID). The QCEW program produces a comprehensive tabulation of employment and wage information for workers covered by California Unemployment Insurance (UI) laws and Federal workers covered by the Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) program. The QCEW program serves as a near census of monthly employment and quarterly wage information by 6-digit industry codes from the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) at the national, state, and county levels. At the national level, the QCEW program publishes employment and wage data for nearly every NAICS industry. At the state and local area level, the QCEW program publishes employment and wage data down to the 6-digit NAICS industry level, if disclosure restrictions are met. In accordance with the BLS policy, data provided to the Bureau in confidence are used only for specified statistical purposes and are not published. The BLS withholds publication of Unemployment Insurance law-covered employment and wage data for any industry level when necessary to protect the identity of cooperating employers. Data from the QCEW program serve as an important input to many BLS programs. The Current Employment Statistics and the Occupational Employment Statistics programs use the QCEW data as the benchmark source for employment. The UI administrative records collected under the QCEW program serve as a sampling frame for the BLS establishment surveys. In addition, the data serve as an input to other federal and state programs. The Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) of the Department of Commerce uses the QCEW data as the base for developing the wage and salary component of personal income. The U.S. Department of Laborâs Employment and Training Administration (ETA) and California's EDD use the QCEW data to administer the Unemployment Insurance program. The QCEW data accurately reflect the extent of coverage of Californiaâs UI laws and are used to measure UI revenues; national, state and local area employment; and total and UI taxable wage trends. The U.S. Department of Laborâs Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes new QCEW data in its County Employment and Wages news release on a quarterly basis. The BLS also publishes a subset of its quarterly data through the Create Customized Tables system, and full quarterly industry detail data at all geographic levels.
CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
The extent of government in private contractual relationships is a vexing public policy issue. This article explores, both theoretically and empirically, the degree to which such intervention may enhance employment. Economists traditionally have held that interventions such as wrongful discharge protections simply undo the original intent of the parties to an employment contract. We find that both good faith as well as implied contract exceptions to employment-at-will may enhance employment, particularly in occupations characterised by high levels of investment and skill. This suggests that under the appropriate conditions, labour law may enhance the operation of a competitive market.
This report presents the latest statistics on type and volume of tribunal cases received, disposed of and outstanding and the number of gender recognition certificates applied for and granted in October to December 2016. Annex C covers management information on employment tribunal receipts.
Additionally, 2 statistical notices have been published below giving further breakdown of SSCS and Immigration and Asylum FTTIAC tribunals.
Question 4 0 Please note â when referring to Widowersâ payments â this is purely in relation to âGoodwinâ cases where a change of rate was potentially required. Following the Employment Tribunal judgement on Goodwin being handed down in June 2020, the government confirmed that the difference in treatment of a male survivor or partner of a female scheme member would need to be equalised in public service pension schemes. The NHS Pension Scheme regulations were consulted on and amended by the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) to reflect the changes with effect from 1 July 2021. A detailed assessment of the scale of administration impact was undertaken in respect of the system and process changes required. Any new survivor benefits calculations have been done in accordance with the judgement. However, for those with benefits in payment at the time, the process of retrospectively recalculating those benefits has taken longer due to resource demands and workload. We are now actively making payment to those affected and paying interest in respect of any which are late.
Financial overview and grant giving statistics of National Employment Law Project
This report presents the latest statistics on type and volume of tribunal cases received, disposed of and outstanding and the number of Gender Recognition Certificates applied for and granted in April to June 2020. Additionally this report includes an annual set of statistics on the Employment and Employment Appeal Tribunals for 2019/20.