The 2005 Environmental Sustainability Index (ESI) is a measure of overall progress towards environmental sustainability, developed for 146 countries. The index provides a composite profile of national environmental stewardship based on a compilation of 21 indicators derived from 76 underlying data sets. The 2005 version of the ESI represents a significant update and improvement on earlier versions; the country ESI scores or rankings should not be compared to earlier versions because of changes to the methodology and underlying data. The index was unveiled at the World Economic Forum's annual meeting, January 2005, Davos, Switzerland. The 2005 ESI is a joint product of the Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy (YCELP) and the Columbia University Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), in collaboration with the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the Joint Research Centre (JRC), European Commission.

The 2000 Pilot Environmental Sustainability Index (ESI) is an exploratory effort to construct an index that measures the ability of a nation's economy to achieve sustainable development, with the long term goal of finding a single indicator for environmental sustainability analagous to that of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The index covering 56 countries is a composite measure of the current status of a nation's environmental systems, pressures on those systems, human vulnerability to environmental change, national capacity to respond, and contributions to global environmental stewardship. The index was unveiled at the World Economic Forum's annual meeting, January 2000, Davos, Switzerland. The 2000 Pilot ESI is the result of collaboration among the World Economic Forum (WEF), Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy (YCELP), and the Columbia University Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN).

The Wellbeing of Nations portion of the Compendium of Environmental Sustainability Indicator Collections contains a subset of 123 variables assembled from the Wellbeing of Nations, which assesses human and ecosystem wellbeing for 183 countries. The variables selected include both raw data and processed indicators and indices created by the report's author, Robert Prescott-Allen. The data are distributed by the Columbia University Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN).

In 2019, the country in the South Asian region which had the best environmental sustainability score was Sri Lanka, with a score of **** points out of seven. Comparatively, Nepal scored *** points out of seven in terms of its environmental sustainability in 2019. The average score for South Asia as a region for its environmental sustainability was *** points out of seven in 2019.

The Ancillary Data portion of the Compendium of Environmental Sustainability Indicator Collections contains 38 variables (time series data on population and gross domestic product as well as region codes, land area, and waterbody area) for 238 countries. The data are taken from the UN Population Division, the World Bank, the CIA Factbook, and CIESIN's Gridded Population of the World, and are distributed by the Columbia University Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN).

In 2019, the country in the Southeast Asian region which had the best environmental sustainability score was Singapore, with a score of *** out of seven. Contrastingly, Cambodia had a environmental sustainability score of just *** points out of seven in 2019. The average score in terms of environmental sustainability for the whole of the Southeast Asian region was *** out of seven, which was below the global average.

CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high) in World was reported at 3.2078 in 2024, according to the World Bank collection of development indicators, compiled from officially recognized sources. World - CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high) - actual values, historical data, forecasts and projections were sourced from the World Bank on July of 2025.

In 2025, 15 percent of respondents in the United States aged 30 to 44 considered environmental sustainability in their travel decisions to a large extent. In contrast, 34 percent of those aged 45 to 64 said they did not consider sustainability at all when making travel plans.

This dataset tracks annual distribution of students across grade levels in Rockaway Park High School For Environmental Sustainability

According to a survey conducted in the second quarter of 2019 in the United States, around ** percent of respondents among Millennials reported they tried to teach their kids about environmental sustainability. In contrast, only ** percent of Baby Boomers surveyed stated that they are doing so as well.

According to the European innovation scoreboard, which measures innovation in Europe according to a variety of different indicators, ******* had the highest score when it came to 'environmental sustainability' a category which measures how countries are reducing the negative impact on the environment from the use of natural resources, from air pollution, and how they much they have developed environment-related technologies.

The Compendium of Environmental Sustainability Indicator Collections, Version 1.1 contains 426 indicators for 239 countries from five major environmental sustainability indicator efforts: the 2006 Environmental Performance Index (EPI), 2005 Environmental Sustainability Index (ESI), 2004 Environmental Vulnerability Index (EVI), the Rio to Johannesburg Dashboard, the Wellbeing of Nations, and 2006 National Footprint Accounts. It also incorporates 38 ancillary variables such as region name, dummy variables for landlocked countries and small island states, population, GDP, and land area. The collection is compiled and distributed by the Columbia University Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN).

According to a survey conducted in 2024, around ** percent of C-level executives pointed out that addressing climate change was the main benefit from their company's sustainability efforts. Meanwhile, around ** percent of the executives believed that customer satisfaction was another benefit from such sustainability efforts.

CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high) in Nigeria was reported at 3 in 2024, according to the World Bank collection of development indicators, compiled from officially recognized sources. Nigeria - CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high) - actual values, historical data, forecasts and projections were sourced from the World Bank on July of 2025.

The Greater China area, including the territories of Taiwan and Hong Kong, is the most advanced user of artificial intelligence (AI) in their efforts for sustainability, with ** percent of organizational respondants responding positively. North-America is the least developed in using AI for sustainability purpose, with less than ******* of companies there using AI in their sustainability efforts.

The Rio to Johannesburg Dashboard of Sustainable Development Indicators portion of the Compendium of Environmental Sustainability Indicator Collections contains 35 Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) indicators for 202 countries. Commonly known as the RioJo Dashboard, indicators are from the CSD Thematic Framework from the Rio Summit (1992 UN conference on the Environment and Development) to the time of the Johannesburg Summit in 2000. The data are distributed by the Columbia University Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN).

Historical Dataset of Rockaway Park High School For Environmental Sustainability is provided by PublicSchoolReview and contain statistics on metrics:Total Students Trends Over Years (2013-2023),Total Classroom Teachers Trends Over Years (2013-2023),Distribution of Students By Grade Trends,Student-Teacher Ratio Comparison Over Years (2013-2023),American Indian Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2011-2023),Asian Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2013-2023),Hispanic Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2013-2023),Black Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2013-2023),White Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2013-2023),Two or More Races Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2013-2023),Diversity Score Comparison Over Years (2013-2023),Free Lunch Eligibility Comparison Over Years (2013-2023),Reduced-Price Lunch Eligibility Comparison Over Years (2012-2023),Reading and Language Arts Proficiency Comparison Over Years (2014-2022),Math Proficiency Comparison Over Years (2014-2022),Science Proficiency Comparison Over Years (2021-2022),Overall School Rank Trends Over Years (2014-2022),Graduation Rate Comparison Over Years (2015-2022)

According to the latest Travel and Tourism Development Index (TTDI), environmental sustainability refers to the protection of the natural resources and environment in a country as well as its ability to adapt to climate change. In 2021, Sweden was the best rated on this pillar out of the four studied Nordic countries, achieving a score of 5.4 points.

The Ancillary Data portion of the Compendium of Environmental Sustainability Indicator Collections contains 38 variables (time series data on population and gross domestic product as well as region codes, land area, and waterbody area) for 238 countries. The data are taken from the UN Population Division, the World Bank, the CIA Factbook, and CIESIN's Gridded Population of the World, and are distributed by the Columbia University Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN).

CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high) in Ghana was reported at 4 in 2024, according to the World Bank collection of development indicators, compiled from officially recognized sources. Ghana - CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high) - actual values, historical data, forecasts and projections were sourced from the World Bank on July of 2025.