Where does healthcare cost the most? (Learn ArcGIS online lesson).In this lesson you will learn how to:Group and display data by different classification methods.Uses statistical analysis to find areas of significantly high and low cost._Communities around the world are taking strides in mitigating the threat that COVID-19 (coronavirus) poses. Geography and location analysis have a crucial role in better understanding this evolving pandemic.When you need help quickly, Esri can provide data, software, configurable applications, and technical support for your emergency GIS operations. Use GIS to rapidly access and visualize mission-critical information. Get the information you need quickly, in a way that’s easy to understand, to make better decisions during a crisis.Esri’s Disaster Response Program (DRP) assists with disasters worldwide as part of our corporate citizenship. We support response and relief efforts with GIS technology and expertise.More information...

Examine the relationship between inmate numbers and the costs of imprisonment.

This layer was created as part of Esri’s Green Infrastructure Initiative and is one of five newly generated companion datasets that can be used for Green Infrastructure (GI) planning at national, regional, and more local scales. If used together, these layers should have corresponding date-based suffixes (YYYYMMDD). The corresponding layer names are: Intact Habitat Cores, Habitat Connectors, Habitat Fragments, Habitat Cost Surface, and Intact Habitat Cores by Betweeness. These Esri derived data, and additional data central to GI planning from other authoritative sources, are also available as Map Packages for each U.S. State and can be downloaded from the Green Infrastructure Data Gallery.This layer represents a cost surface for use in landscape connectivity modeling. It reflects the relative ease of movement for terrestrial species taking into account several factors including: NLCD landcover classes, slope, proximity to water, and habitat core score. Generally speaking, natural land cover classes and areas proximal to water are parametrized to exhibit lower costs to species movement while developed areas and areas proximal to built infrastructure are parameterized to exhibit higher costs to species movement. Esri created this layer by following a methodology outlined by the Green Infrastructure Center, Inc. The cost surface was generated using a raster overlay process to create a composite comprised of several landscape variables. Characteristics within each variable were scored based on their perceived impact on species movement whereas reduced movement is reflected as high cost. Landscape variables were categorized into three themed classes based on their expected influence on the cost surface. The first class, impedance, represents the expected cost of species movement as it relates to land cover. The second class, bonuses, represents reductions in cost resulting from being within an existing core, fragment, or proximal to surface water; these conditions are assumed to enhance movement. The third class, penalties, represents increases in cost resulting from steeply sloping terrain and road infrastructure; these conditions are assumed to discourage movement.

This cost surface was used to generate a comprehensive network of Least Cost Paths (LCPs) using the Cost Connectivity tool which was introduced in ArcGIS 10.4 and ArcGISPro in 1.3. The resulting network was also utilized to compute Betweenness Centrality attribution for the Intact Habitat Cores by Betweenness layer, denoting a measure of the Core’s connectivity importance compared to all others in the network. This cost surface may be applicable for use in additional structurally focused landscape connectivity assessments and the generation of landscape corridors.Data Coordinate System: NAD_1983_Albers

The arrival of ArcGIS Pro has brought a challenge to ArcMap users. The new software is sufficiently different in architecture and layout that switching from the old to the new is not a simple process. In some ways, Pro is harder to learn for ArcMap users than for new GIS users, because some workflows have to be unlearned, or at least heavily modified. Current ArcMap users are pressed for time, trying to learn the new software while still completing their daily tasks, so a book that teaches Pro from the start is not an efficient method.Switching to ArcGIS Pro from ArcMap aims to quickly transition ArcMap users to ArcGIS Pro. Rather than teaching Pro from the start, as for a novice user, this book focuses on how Pro is different from ArcMap. Covering the most common and important workflows required for most GIS work, it leverages the user’s prior experience to enable a more rapid adjustment to Pro.AUDIENCEProfessional and scholarly; College/higher education; General/trade.AUTHOR BIOMaribeth H. Price, PhD, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, has been using Esri products since 1991, teaching college GIS since 1995 and writing textbooks utilizing Esri’s software since 2001. She has extensive familiarity with both ArcMap/ArcCatalog and Pro, both as a user and in the classroom, as well as long experience writing about GIS concepts and developing software tutorials. She teaches GIS workshops, having offered more than 100 workshops to over 1,200 participants since 2000.Pub Date: Print: 2/14/2019 Digital: 1/28/2019 Format: PaperbackISBN: Print: 9781589485440 Digital: 9781589485457 Trim: 8 x 10 in.Price: Print: $49.99 USD Digital: $49.99 USD Pages: 172Table of ContentsPreface1 Contemplating the switch to ArcGIS ProBackgroundSystem requirementsLicensingCapabilities of ArcGIS ProWhen should I switch?Time to exploreObjective 1.1: Downloading the data for these exercisesObjective 1.2: Starting ArcGIS Pro, signing in, creating a project, and exploring the interfaceObjective 1.3: Accessing maps and data from ArcGIS OnlineObjective 1.4: Arranging the windows and panesObjective 1.5: Accessing the helpObjective 1.6: Importing a map document2 Unpacking the GUIBackgroundThe ribbon and tabsPanesViewsTime to exploreObjective 2.1: Getting familiar with the Contents paneObjective 2.2: Learning to work with objects and tabsObjective 2.3: Exploring the Catalog pane3 The projectBackgroundWhat is a project?Items stored in a projectPaths in projectsRenaming projectsTime to exploreObjective 3.1: Exploring different elements of a projectObjective 3.2: Accessing properties of projects, maps, and other items4 Navigating and exploring mapsBackgroundExploring maps2D and 3D navigationTime to exploreObjective 4.1: Learning to use the Map toolsObjective 4.2: Exploring 3D scenes and linking views5 Symbolizing mapsBackgroundAccessing the symbol settings for layersAccessing the labeling propertiesSymbolizing rastersTime to exploreObjective 5.1: Modifying single symbolsObjective 5.2: Creating maps from attributesObjective 5.3: Creating labelsObjective 5.4: Managing labelsObjective 5.5: Symbolizing rasters6 GeoprocessingBackgroundWhat’s differentAnalysis buttons and toolsTool licensingTime to exploreObjective 6.1: Getting familiar with the geoprocessing interfaceObjective 6.2: Performing interactive selectionsObjective 6.3: Performing selections based on attributesObjective 6.4: Performing selections based on locationObjective 6.5: Practicing geoprocessing7 TablesBackgroundGeneral table characteristicsJoining and relating tablesMaking chartsTime to exploreObjective 7.1: Managing table viewsObjective 7.2: Creating and managing properties of a chartObjective 7.3: Calculating statistics for tablesObjective 7.4: Calculating and editing in tables8 LayoutsBackgroundLayouts and map framesLayout editing proceduresImporting map documents and templatesTime to exploreObjective 8.1: Creating the maps for the layoutObjective 8.2: Setting up a layout page with map framesObjective 8.3: Setting map frame extent and scaleObjective 8.4: Formatting the map frameObjective 8.5: Creating and formatting map elementsObjective 8.6: Fine-tuning the legendObjective 8.7: Accessing and copying layouts9 Managing dataBackgroundData modelsManaging the geodatabase schemaCreating domainsManaging data from diverse sourcesProject longevityManaging shared data for work groupsTime to exploreObjective 9.1: Creating a project and exporting data to itObjective 9.2: Creating feature classesObjective 9.3: Creating and managing metadataObjective 9.4: Creating fields and domainsObjective 9.5: Modifying the table schemaObjective 9.6: Sharing data using ArcGIS Online10 EditingBackgroundBasic editing functionsCreating featuresModifying existing featuresCreating and editing annotationTime to exploreObjective 10.1: Understanding the editing tools in ArcGIS ProObjective 10.2: Creating pointsObjective 10.3: Creating linesObjective 10.4: Creating polygonsObjective 10.5: Modifying existing featuresObjective 10.6: Creating an annotation feature classObjective 10.7: Editing annotationObjective 10.8: Creating annotation features11 Moving forwardData sourcesIndex

This packaged data collection contains two sets of two additional model runs that used the same inputs and parameters as our primary model, with the exception being we implemented a "maximum corridor length" constraint that allowed us to identify and visualize the corridors as being well-connected (≤15km) or moderately connected (≤45km). This is based on an assumption that corridors longer than 45km are too long to sufficiently accommodate dispersal. One of these sets is based on a maximum corridor length that uses Euclidean (straight-line) distance, while the other set is based on a maximum corridor length that uses cost-weighted distance. These two sets of corridors can be compared against the full set of corridors from our primary model to identify the remaining corridors, which could be considered poorly connected. This package includes the following data layers: Corridors classified as well connected (≤15km) based on Cost-weighted Distance Corridors classified as moderately connected (≤45km) based on Cost-weighted Distance Corridors classified as well connected (≤15km) based on Euclidean Distance Corridors classified as moderately connected (≤45km) based on Euclidean Distance Please refer to the embedded metadata and the information in our full report for details on the development of these data layers. Packaged data are available in two formats: Geodatabase (.gdb): A related set of file geodatabase rasters and feature classes, packaged in an ESRI file geodatabase. ArcGIS Pro Map Package (.mpkx): The same data included in the geodatabase, presented as fully-symbolized layers in a map. Note that you must have ArcGIS Pro version 2.0 or greater to view. See Cross-References for links to individual datasets, which can be downloaded in raster GeoTIFF (.tif) format.

The global GIS mapping tools market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing demand across diverse sectors. The market, estimated at $15 billion in 2025, is projected to expand at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 8% from 2025 to 2033, reaching approximately $28 billion by 2033. This growth is fueled by several key factors. Firstly, the burgeoning adoption of cloud-based solutions offers scalability, cost-effectiveness, and enhanced accessibility to a wider user base, including small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Secondly, the escalating need for precise spatial data analysis in various applications, such as urban planning, geological exploration, and water resource management, is significantly boosting market demand. The increasing integration of GIS with other technologies like AI and IoT further amplifies its capabilities, leading to more sophisticated applications and increased market penetration. Finally, government initiatives promoting digitalization and smart city development across the globe are indirectly fueling this market expansion. However, certain restraints limit market growth. The high initial investment cost for advanced GIS software and the requirement for skilled professionals to operate these systems can be a barrier, especially for smaller organizations. Additionally, data security and privacy concerns related to the handling of sensitive geographical information pose challenges to wider adoption. Market segmentation reveals strong growth in the cloud-based GIS segment, driven by its inherent advantages, while applications in urban planning and geological exploration lead the application-based segmentation. North America and Europe currently hold significant market shares, with strong growth potential in the Asia-Pacific region due to increasing infrastructure development and government investments. Leading companies like Esri, Hexagon, and Autodesk are shaping the market landscape through continuous innovation and competitive pricing strategies, while the emergence of open-source options like QGIS and GRASS GIS provides alternative, cost-effective solutions.

Esri Disaster Response Program (DRP) assistance request form. Use this website to request assistance.

The global GIS mapping tools market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing demand across diverse sectors. The market's expansion is fueled by several key factors: the rising adoption of cloud-based GIS solutions offering enhanced accessibility and scalability, the escalating need for precise spatial data analysis in urban planning and resource management, and the expanding application of GIS in geological exploration for efficient resource discovery and extraction. Furthermore, advancements in location-based services (LBS) and the integration of GIS with other technologies such as IoT and AI are creating new opportunities and driving market expansion. While the market size in 2025 is estimated at $15 billion (a reasonable assumption considering similar market sizes for related technologies), the Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) is projected to remain strong, likely exceeding 8% through 2033. This sustained growth indicates a highly promising market outlook for vendors and investors. However, market growth is not without challenges. High initial investment costs for sophisticated GIS software and the requirement for skilled personnel to operate and maintain these systems can pose barriers to entry, particularly for smaller organizations. Additionally, data security concerns and the need for robust data management strategies are critical factors impacting market adoption. Despite these constraints, the continued integration of GIS tools into various business processes and the growing availability of user-friendly, affordable solutions are expected to mitigate these challenges and propel the market towards sustained and significant growth in the coming years. Segmentation reveals a strong preference for cloud-based solutions due to their flexibility and cost-effectiveness, with the geological exploration and urban planning applications exhibiting the highest growth rates. Key players such as Esri, Autodesk, and Hexagon are strategically positioned to capitalize on these trends.

The global GIS mapping tools market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing demand across diverse sectors. The market, estimated at $15 billion in 2025, is projected to witness a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 10% from 2025 to 2033, reaching approximately $39 billion by 2033. This expansion is fueled by several key factors. Firstly, the rising adoption of cloud-based GIS solutions offers enhanced accessibility, scalability, and cost-effectiveness, particularly appealing to smaller organizations. Secondly, the burgeoning need for precise spatial data analysis in various applications, including urban planning, geological exploration, and water resource management, significantly contributes to market growth. Thirdly, advancements in technologies such as AI and machine learning are integrating into GIS tools, leading to more sophisticated analytical capabilities and improved decision-making. Finally, the increasing availability of high-resolution satellite imagery and other geospatial data further fuels market expansion. However, market growth is not without challenges. High initial investment costs associated with implementing and maintaining sophisticated GIS systems can pose a barrier to entry for smaller businesses. Furthermore, the complexity of GIS software and the need for specialized skills to operate and interpret data effectively can limit widespread adoption. Despite these restraints, the market’s overall trajectory remains positive, with the cloud-based segment projected to maintain a dominant market share due to its inherent advantages. Growth will be geographically diverse, with North America and Europe continuing to be significant markets, while Asia-Pacific is expected to experience the fastest growth due to rapid urbanization and infrastructure development. The continued development of user-friendly interfaces and increased integration with other business intelligence tools will further accelerate market expansion in the coming years.

This map shows households that spend 30 percent or more of their income on housing, a threshold widely used by many affordable housing advocates and official government sources including Housing and Urban Development. Census asks about income and housing costs to understand whether housing is affordable in local communities. When housing is not sufficient or not affordable, income data helps communities: Enroll eligible households in programs designed to assist them.Qualify for grants from the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnership Program, Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG), Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA), and other programs.When rental housing is not affordable, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) uses rent data to determine the amount of tenant subsidies in housing assistance programs.Map opens in Atlanta. Use the bookmarks or search bar to view other cities. Data is symbolized to show the relationship between burdensome housing costs for owner households with a mortgage and renter households:This map uses these hosted feature layers containing the most recent American Community Survey data. These layers are part of the ArcGIS Living Atlas, and are updated every year when the American Community Survey releases new estimates, so values in the map always reflect the newest data available.

Alaska Energy Authority Power Cost Equalization (PCE) program by community. The power cost equalization program supports rural Alaskans who live in areas where energy costs are significantly higher than urban areas in meeting the cost of electricity."AEA determines eligibility of community facilities and residential customers and authorizes payment to the electric utility. Commercial customers are not eligible to receive PCE credit. Participating utilities are required to reduce each eligible customer’s bill by the amount that the State pays for PCE. RCA determines if a utility is eligible to participate in the program and calculates the amount of PCE per kWh payable to the utility. More information about the RCA may be found at www.state.ak.us/rca."(AEA, 2017)Source: Alaska Energy AuthorityThis data has been visualized in a Geographic Information Systems (GIS) format and is provided as a service in the DCRA Information Portal by the Alaska Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development Division of Community and Regional Affairs (SOA DCCED DCRA), Research and Analysis section. SOA DCCED DCRA Research and Analysis is not the authoritative source for this data - it has been primarily compiled from AEA PCE Fiscal Year Utility Report PDFs. For more information and for questions about this data, see: AEA Power Cost Equalization

This layer shows the location of URA Building Rehabilitation Projects Cost Reference in Hong Kong. It is a set of data made available by the Urban Renewal Authority under the Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (the "Government") at https://GEODATA.GOV.HK/ ("Hong Kong Geodata Store"). The source data is in GML format and has been processed and converted into Esri File Geodatabase format and uploaded to Esri's ArcGIS Online platform for sharing and reference purpose. The objectives are to facilitate our Hong Kong ArcGIS Online users to use the data in a spatial ready format and save their data conversion effort.For details about the data, source format and terms of conditions of usage, please refer to the website of Hong Kong Geodata Store at https://geodata.gov.hk.

The global GIS mapping tools market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing demand across diverse sectors. The market, estimated at $15 billion in 2025, is projected to exhibit a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 12% from 2025 to 2033, reaching an estimated market value of approximately $45 billion by 2033. Key drivers include the rising adoption of cloud-based GIS solutions, enhanced data analytics capabilities, the proliferation of location-based services, and the growing need for precise spatial data analysis in various industries like urban planning, geological exploration, and water resource management. The market is segmented by application (Geological Exploration, Water Conservancy Projects, Urban Planning, Others) and type (Cloud-based, Web-based). Cloud-based solutions are gaining significant traction due to their scalability, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness. The increasing availability of high-resolution satellite imagery and advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are further fueling market expansion. While data security concerns and the high initial investment costs for some advanced solutions present restraints, the overall market outlook remains positive, with significant opportunities for both established players and emerging technology providers. Geographical expansion is another key aspect of market growth. North America and Europe currently hold a significant market share, owing to established GIS infrastructure and early adoption of advanced technologies. However, the Asia-Pacific region is expected to witness rapid growth in the coming years, driven by rising government investments in infrastructure development and increasing urbanization in countries like China and India. Competitive dynamics are shaping the market, with major players like Esri, Autodesk, Hexagon, and Mapbox competing on the basis of software features, data integration capabilities, and customer support. The emergence of open-source GIS solutions like QGIS and GRASS GIS is also challenging the dominance of proprietary software, offering cost-effective alternatives for various applications. The continued development and integration of advanced technologies like 3D mapping, real-time data visualization, and location intelligence will further enhance the capabilities of GIS mapping tools, driving market expansion and innovation across various sectors.

The geographical mapping software market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing demand across diverse sectors. The market, estimated at $15 billion in 2025, is projected to expand at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 12% from 2025 to 2033, reaching an estimated $45 billion by 2033. This expansion is fueled by several key factors. The rise of cloud-based solutions offers enhanced accessibility, scalability, and collaboration features, attracting a broader user base. Furthermore, the increasing adoption of GIS (Geographic Information Systems) technology in various applications, including geological exploration, water conservancy projects, and urban planning, is significantly boosting market demand. Government initiatives promoting digital infrastructure development and smart city projects are further contributing to market growth. The rising need for precise location-based services and real-time data analysis across sectors like transportation, logistics, and agriculture also plays a significant role. While data security concerns and the high initial investment costs associated with implementing sophisticated mapping software can act as restraints, the overall market outlook remains highly positive. The market segmentation reveals strong growth in both cloud-based and web-based solutions. Cloud-based solutions are gaining traction due to their flexibility and cost-effectiveness, while web-based solutions remain popular for their ease of use and accessibility. The application segment demonstrates considerable potential, with geological exploration and urban planning leading the way. This suggests a robust future for geographical mapping software, particularly in areas requiring detailed spatial analysis and data visualization. Geographical regions like North America and Europe currently hold a significant market share, but the Asia-Pacific region is expected to witness rapid growth in the coming years driven by increasing infrastructure development and technological advancements. Competition in the market is intense, with established players like Esri and Autodesk alongside emerging innovative companies vying for market share. The continuous evolution of GIS technology, encompassing features like AI-powered analytics and 3D mapping capabilities, is set to further shape market dynamics in the years to come.

The geographical mapping software market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing demand across diverse sectors. The market's expansion is fueled by several key factors: the rising adoption of cloud-based solutions offering enhanced accessibility and scalability, the burgeoning need for precise spatial data analysis in urban planning and water resource management, and the escalating use of GIS technology in geological exploration for resource discovery and environmental monitoring. The market's compound annual growth rate (CAGR) is estimated at 8% between 2025 and 2033, projecting significant market expansion. This growth is further supported by the increasing availability of high-resolution satellite imagery and improved data processing capabilities, leading to more accurate and detailed maps for various applications. While the market shows strong potential, certain restraints, including high software licensing costs and the complexity of some GIS software, may impede growth to some extent. However, the overall trend leans towards increased adoption driven by the significant benefits of enhanced spatial analysis across industries. Market segmentation reveals a strong demand for cloud-based solutions due to their flexibility and cost-effectiveness compared to web-based or on-premise software. Geographically, North America and Europe currently hold significant market shares, reflecting established GIS infrastructure and technological advancement. However, Asia-Pacific is expected to witness substantial growth in the coming years driven by rapid urbanization, infrastructure development, and increased government investment in mapping initiatives. This region's expanding market will be fueled by countries like China and India, with significant potential for market penetration. The key players in this competitive landscape continually innovate, releasing new features and functionalities to maintain their market positions. The focus is increasingly on user-friendliness, integration with other software platforms, and advanced analytical capabilities.

Link to landing page referenced by identifier. Service Protocol: Link to landing page referenced by identifier. Link Function: information-- dc:identifier.

Learn state-of-the-art skills to build compelling, useful, and fun Web GIS apps easily, with no programming experience required.Building on the foundation of the previous three editions, Getting to Know Web GIS, fourth edition,features the latest advances in Esri’s entire Web GIS platform, from the cloud server side to the client side.Discover and apply what’s new in ArcGIS Online, ArcGIS Enterprise, Map Viewer, Esri StoryMaps, Web AppBuilder, ArcGIS Survey123, and more.Learn about recent Web GIS products such as ArcGIS Experience Builder, ArcGIS Indoors, and ArcGIS QuickCapture. Understand updates in mobile GIS such as ArcGIS Collector and AuGeo, and then build your own web apps.Further your knowledge and skills with detailed sections and chapters on ArcGIS Dashboards, ArcGIS Analytics for the Internet of Things, online spatial analysis, image services, 3D web scenes, ArcGIS API for JavaScript, and best practices in Web GIS.Each chapter is written for immediate productivity with a good balance of principles and hands-on exercises and includes:A conceptual discussion section to give you the big picture and principles,A detailed tutorial section with step-by-step instructions,A Q/A section to answer common questions,An assignment section to reinforce your comprehension, andA list of resources with more information.Ideal for classroom lab work and on-the-job training for GIS students, instructors, GIS analysts, managers, web developers, and other professionals, Getting to Know Web GIS, fourth edition, uses a holistic approach to systematically teach the breadth of the Esri Geospatial Cloud.AUDIENCEProfessional and scholarly. College/higher education. General/trade.AUTHOR BIOPinde Fu leads the ArcGIS Platform Engineering team at Esri Professional Services and teaches at universities including Harvard University Extension School. His specialties include web and mobile GIS technologies and applications in various industries. Several of his projects have won specialachievement awards. Fu is the lead author of Web GIS: Principles and Applications (Esri Press, 2010).Pub Date: Print: 7/21/2020 Digital: 6/16/2020 Format: Trade paperISBN: Print: 9781589485921 Digital: 9781589485938 Trim: 7.5 x 9 in.Price: Print: $94.99 USD Digital: $94.99 USD Pages: 490TABLE OF CONTENTSPrefaceForeword1 Get started with Web GIS2 Hosted feature layers and storytelling with GIS3 Web AppBuilder for ArcGIS and ArcGIS Experience Builder4 Mobile GIS5 Tile layers and on-premises Web GIS6 Spatial temporal data and real-time GIS7 3D web scenes8 Spatial analysis and geoprocessing9 Image service and online raster analysis10 Web GIS programming with ArcGIS API for JavaScriptPinde Fu | Interview with Esri Press | 2020-07-10 | 15:56 | Link.

This layer contains 2010-2014 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year data, and contains estimates and margins of error. The layer shows housing costs as a percentage of household income. This is shown by tract, county, and state boundaries. There are also additional calculated attributes related to this topic, which can be mapped or used within analysis. Income is based on earnings in past 12 months of survey. This layer is symbolized to show the percent of renter households that spend 30.0% or more of their household income on gross rent (contract rent plus tenant-paid utilities). To see the full list of attributes available in this service, go to the "Data" tab, and choose "Fields" at the top right. Vintage: 2010-2014ACS Table(s): B25070, B25091 Data downloaded from: Census Bureau's API for American Community Survey Date of API call: November 11, 2020National Figures: data.census.govThe United States Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS):About the SurveyGeography & ACSTechnical DocumentationNews & UpdatesThis ready-to-use layer can be used within ArcGIS Pro, ArcGIS Online, its configurable apps, dashboards, Story Maps, custom apps, and mobile apps. Data can also be exported for offline workflows. For more information about ACS layers, visit the FAQ. Please cite the Census and ACS when using this data.Data Note from the Census:Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables.Data Processing Notes:This layer has associated layers containing the most recent ACS data available by the U.S. Census Bureau. Click here to learn more about ACS data releases and click here for the associated boundaries layer. The reason this data is 5+ years different from the most recent vintage is due to the overlapping of survey years. It is recommended by the U.S. Census Bureau to compare non-overlapping datasets.Boundaries come from the US Census TIGER geodatabases. Boundary vintage (2014) appropriately matches the data vintage as specified by the Census. These are Census boundaries with water and/or coastlines clipped for cartographic purposes. For census tracts, the water cutouts are derived from a subset of the 2010 AWATER (Area Water) boundaries offered by TIGER. For state and county boundaries, the water and coastlines are derived from the coastlines of the 500k TIGER Cartographic Boundary Shapefiles. The original AWATER and ALAND fields are still available as attributes within the data table (units are square meters). The States layer contains 52 records - all US states, Washington D.C., and Puerto RicoCensus tracts with no population that occur in areas of water, such as oceans, are removed from this data service (Census Tracts beginning with 99).Percentages and derived counts, and associated margins of error, are calculated values (that can be identified by the "_calc_" stub in the field name), and abide by the specifications defined by the American Community Survey.Field alias names were created based on the Table Shells file available from the American Community Survey Summary File Documentation page.Negative values (e.g., -4444...) have been set to null, with the exception of -5555... which has been set to zero. These negative values exist in the raw API data to indicate the following situations:The margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate.Either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution.The median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution, or in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate.The estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate.The data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.

The global satellite remote sensing software market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing demand across diverse sectors. While precise figures for market size and CAGR aren't provided, considering the technological advancements and applications in agriculture (precision farming, crop monitoring), water conservancy (flood management, irrigation optimization), forest management (deforestation monitoring, resource assessment), and the public sector (urban planning, disaster response), a conservative estimate places the 2025 market size at approximately $2 billion. This figure reflects the substantial investments in satellite imagery acquisition and analysis capabilities worldwide. The market is further fueled by the rising adoption of cloud-based solutions, enhancing accessibility and scalability of software platforms. Trends such as the integration of AI and machine learning for automated image processing, the proliferation of high-resolution satellite imagery, and the increasing availability of open-source software are accelerating market expansion. However, factors such as the high cost of specialized software licenses and the need for skilled professionals to operate the sophisticated systems act as restraints. The market is segmented by application (agriculture, water conservancy, forest management, public sector, others) and software type (open-source, non-open-source). The North American and European markets currently hold significant shares, but the Asia-Pacific region is witnessing rapid growth due to increasing infrastructure development and government initiatives promoting geospatial technologies. This dynamic market landscape presents lucrative opportunities for both established players and emerging companies in the years to come. The forecast period (2025-2033) anticipates continued growth, with a projected CAGR of approximately 12%, driven by the aforementioned technological advancements and broadening applications across various industry verticals. The competitive landscape is comprised of both major players like ESRI, Trimble, and PCI Geomatica, offering comprehensive suites of software, and smaller, specialized companies focusing on niche applications or open-source solutions. The market is characterized by both proprietary and open-source software options. Open-source solutions like QGIS and GRASS GIS offer cost-effective alternatives, particularly for research and smaller organizations, while commercial solutions provide advanced functionalities and support. The increasing availability of cloud-based solutions is blurring the lines between these segments, with hybrid models emerging that combine the benefits of both. Future growth will be significantly influenced by collaborations between software providers and satellite imagery providers, fostering a more integrated ecosystem and streamlining the data acquisition and processing workflow. The market will continue to benefit from advancements in satellite technology, producing higher-resolution, more frequent, and more affordable imagery.

This layer contains a record of each sale to a customer.