Web traffic statistics for the several City-Parish websites, brla.gov, city.brla.gov, Red Stick Ready, GIS, Open Data etc. Information provided by Google Analytics.

The global website visitor tracking software market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing need for businesses to understand online customer behavior and optimize their digital strategies. The market, estimated at $5 billion in 2025, is projected to expand at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 15% from 2025 to 2033, reaching approximately $15 billion by 2033. This expansion is fueled by several key factors, including the rising adoption of digital marketing strategies, the growing importance of data-driven decision-making, and the increasing sophistication of website visitor tracking tools. Cloud-based solutions dominate the market due to their scalability, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness, particularly appealing to Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs). However, large enterprises continue to invest significantly in on-premise solutions for enhanced data security and control. The market is highly competitive, with numerous established players and emerging startups offering a range of features and functionalities. Technological advancements, such as AI-powered analytics and enhanced integration with other marketing tools, are shaping the future of the market. The market's geographical distribution reflects the global digital landscape. North America, with its mature digital economy and high adoption rates, holds a significant market share. However, regions like Asia-Pacific are showing rapid growth, driven by increasing internet penetration and digitalization across various industries. Despite the overall positive outlook, challenges such as data privacy regulations and the increasing complexity of website tracking technology are influencing market dynamics. The ongoing competition among vendors necessitates continuous innovation and the development of more user-friendly and insightful tools. The future growth of the website visitor tracking software market is promising, fueled by the continuing importance of data-driven decision-making within marketing and business strategies. A key factor will be the ongoing adaptation to evolving privacy regulations and user expectations.

craigslist.org is ranked #73 in US with 125.7M Traffic. Categories: Online Services, Real Estate. Learn more about website traffic, market share, and more!

As of the second quarter of 2022, Shopee Philippines, an online department store and marketplace for retailers to sell their products, registered estimated monthly traffic of about ** million on its e-commerce website. Following by a considerable margin was Lazada, with an estimated online website traffic of roughly ** million visitors. Both companies lead the e-commerce market in the Philippines.

In 2024, most of the global website traffic was still generated by humans, but bot traffic is constantly growing. Fraudulent traffic through bad bot actors accounted for 37 percent of global web traffic in the most recently measured period, representing an increase of 12 percent from the previous year. Sophistication of Bad Bots on the rise The complexity of malicious bot activity has dramatically increased in recent years. Advanced bad bots have doubled in prevalence over the past 2 years, indicating a surge in the sophistication of cyber threats. Simultaneously, the share of simple bad bots drastically increased over the last years, suggesting a shift in the landscape of automated threats. Meanwhile, areas like food and groceries, sports, gambling, and entertainment faced the highest amount of advanced bad bots, with more than 70 percent of their bot traffic affected by evasive applications. Good and bad bots across industries The impact of bot traffic varies across different sectors. Bad bots accounted for over 50 percent of the telecom and ISPs, community and society, and computing and IT segments web traffic. However, not all bot traffic is considered bad. Some of these applications help index websites for search engines or monitor website performance, assisting users throughout their online search. Therefore, areas like entertainment, food and groceries, and even areas targeted by bad bots themselves experienced notable levels of good bot traffic, demonstrating the diverse applications of benign automated systems across different sectors.

The website traffic analysis tool market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing reliance of businesses, both large and small, on digital marketing strategies. The demand for data-driven decision-making and performance optimization across various online channels is fueling the adoption of these tools. The market, estimated at $15 billion in 2025, is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 15% through 2033, reaching approximately $45 billion. This growth is fueled by several key trends: the rise of cloud-based solutions offering greater scalability and accessibility, increasing sophistication of analytics capabilities (including AI-powered insights), and a growing need for comprehensive website performance monitoring. While the market exhibits strong growth potential, businesses face challenges including the increasing complexity of website analytics, the need for skilled personnel to interpret data effectively, and the rising costs associated with premium features and advanced analytics platforms. The segmentation reveals a significant presence of both SMEs and large enterprises leveraging the technology, with a clear preference toward cloud-based solutions due to their flexibility and cost-effectiveness. Key players such as Semrush, Ahrefs, Google Analytics, and others are actively shaping the market through continuous innovation and expansion into new markets. The geographical distribution of the market reflects a strong presence in North America and Europe, driven by higher digital maturity and adoption rates within these regions. However, significant growth opportunities exist in Asia Pacific and other emerging markets, as digital infrastructure expands and businesses increasingly prioritize online presence. The competitive landscape is characterized by a mix of established players and emerging startups, leading to continuous innovation and price competition, benefiting end users. This intense competition drives the development of advanced features such as real-time analytics, predictive modeling, and integration with other marketing tools. The ongoing evolution of digital marketing itself is a major driver, requiring the constant refinement and improvement of these analytics tools to keep pace with changes in SEO, social media, and online advertising practices. This creates a dynamic environment conducive to further market expansion.

Annual average daily traffic is the total volume for the year divided by 365 days. The traffic count year is from October 1st through September 30th. Very few locations in California are actually counted continuously. Traffic Counting is generally performed by electronic counting instruments moved from location throughout the State in a program of continuous traffic count sampling. The resulting counts are adjusted to an estimate of annual average daily traffic by compensating for seasonal influence, weekly variation and other variables which may be present. Annual ADT is necessary for presenting a statewide picture of traffic flow, evaluating traffic trends, computing accident rates. planning and designing highways and other purposes.Traffic Census Program Page

Traffic analytics, rankings, and competitive metrics for similarweb.com as of June 2025

amazon.com is ranked #3 in US with 2.82B Traffic. Categories: Online Services. Learn more about website traffic, market share, and more!

Mobile accounts for approximately half of web traffic worldwide. In the last quarter of 2024, mobile devices (excluding tablets) generated 62.54 percent of global website traffic. Mobiles and smartphones consistently hoovered around the 50 percent mark since the beginning of 2017, before surpassing it in 2020. Mobile traffic Due to low infrastructure and financial restraints, many emerging digital markets skipped the desktop internet phase entirely and moved straight onto mobile internet via smartphone and tablet devices. India is a prime example of a market with a significant mobile-first online population. Other countries with a significant share of mobile internet traffic include Nigeria, Ghana and Kenya. In most African markets, mobile accounts for more than half of the web traffic. By contrast, mobile only makes up around 45.49 percent of online traffic in the United States. Mobile usage The most popular mobile internet activities worldwide include watching movies or videos online, e-mail usage and accessing social media. Apps are a very popular way to watch video on the go and the most-downloaded entertainment apps in the Apple App Store are Netflix, Tencent Video and Amazon Prime Video.

General data recollected for the studio " Analysis of the Quantitative Impact of Social Networks on Web Traffic of Cybermedia in the 27 Countries of the European Union". Four research questions are posed: what percentage of the total web traffic generated by cybermedia in the European Union comes from social networks? Is said percentage higher or lower than that provided through direct traffic and through the use of search engines via SEO positioning? Which social networks have a greater impact? And is there any degree of relationship between the specific weight of social networks in the web traffic of a cybermedia and circumstances such as the average duration of the user's visit, the number of page views or the bounce rate understood in its formal aspect of not performing any kind of interaction on the visited page beyond reading its content? To answer these questions, we have first proceeded to a selection of the cybermedia with the highest web traffic of the 27 countries that are currently part of the European Union after the United Kingdom left on December 31, 2020. In each nation we have selected five media using a combination of the global web traffic metrics provided by the tools Alexa (https://www.alexa.com/), which ceased to be operational on May 1, 2022, and SimilarWeb (https:// www.similarweb.com/). We have not used local metrics by country since the results obtained with these first two tools were sufficiently significant and our objective is not to establish a ranking of cybermedia by nation but to examine the relevance of social networks in their web traffic. In all cases, cybermedia whose property corresponds to a journalistic company have been selected, ruling out those belonging to telecommunications portals or service providers; in some cases they correspond to classic information companies (both newspapers and televisions) while in others they refer to digital natives, without this circumstance affecting the nature of the research proposed.
Below we have proceeded to examine the web traffic data of said cybermedia. The period corresponding to the months of October, November and December 2021 and January, February and March 2022 has been selected. We believe that this six-month stretch allows possible one-time variations to be overcome for a month, reinforcing the precision of the data obtained. To secure this data, we have used the SimilarWeb tool, currently the most precise tool that exists when examining the web traffic of a portal, although it is limited to that coming from desktops and laptops, without taking into account those that come from mobile devices, currently impossible to determine with existing measurement tools on the market. It includes:

Web traffic general data: average visit duration, pages per visit and bounce rate Web traffic origin by country Percentage of traffic generated from social media over total web traffic Distribution of web traffic generated from social networks Comparison of web traffic generated from social netwoks with direct and search procedures

The census count of vehicles on city streets is normally reported in the form of Average Daily Traffic (ADT) counts. These counts provide a good estimate for the actual number of vehicles on an average weekday at select street segments. Specific block segments are selected for a count because they are deemed as representative of a larger segment on the same roadway. ADT counts are used by transportation engineers, economists, real estate agents, planners, and others professionals for planning and operational analysis. The frequency for each count varies depending on City staff’s needs for analysis in any given area. This report covers the counts taken in our City during the past 12 years approximately.

youtube.com is ranked #1 in KR with 47.12B Traffic. Categories: Newspapers, Online Services. Learn more about website traffic, market share, and more!

This dataset contains estimates of the average number of vehicles that used roads throughout the City of Detroit. Each record indicates the Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) and Commercial Annual Average Daily Traffic (CAADT) for a road segment, where the road segment is located, and other characteristics. This data is derived from Michigan Department of Transportation's (MDOT) Open Data Portal. SEMCOG was the source for speed limits and number of lanes.

The primary measure, Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT), is the estimated mean daily traffic volume for all types of vehicles. Commercial Annual Average Daily Traffic (CAADT) is the estimated mean daily traffic volume for commercial vehicles, a subset of vehicles included in the AADT. The Route ID is an identifier for each road in Detroit (e.g., Woodward Ave). Routes are divided into segments by features such as cross streets, and Location ID's are used to uniquely identify those segments. Along with traffic volume, each record also states the number of lanes, the posted speed limit, and the type of road (e.g., Trunkline or Ramp) based on the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) functional classification system.

According to MDOT's Traffic Monitoring Program a commercial vehicle would be anything Class 4 and up in the FHWA vehicle classification system. This includes vehicles such as buses, semi-trucks, and personal recreational vehicles (i.e., RVs or campers). Methods used to determine traffic volume vary by site, and may rely on continuous monitoring or estimates based on short-term studies. Approaches to vehicle classification similarly vary, depending on the equipment used at a site, and may consider factors such as vehicle weight and length between axles.

For more information, please visit MDOT Traffic Monitoring Program.

With more than 44,000 Portable Traffic Count (PTC) Stations located throughout North Carolina, Traffic Survey has adopted a collection schedule. Please see our website: https://www.ncdot.gov/projects/trafficsurvey/for further details. The data in this file was digitized referencing the available NCDOT Linear Referencing System (LRS) and is not the result of using GPS equipment in the field, nor latitude and longitude coordinates. The referencing provided is based on the 2015 Quarter 1 publication of the NCDOT Linear Referencing System (LRS). Some differences will be found when using different quarterly publications with this data set. The data provided is seasonally factored to an estimate of an annual average of daily traffic. The statistics provided are: CVRG_VLM_I: Traffic Survey's seven digit unique station identifier COUNTY: County NameROUTE: Numbered route identifier, or local name if not State maintainedLOCATION: Description of the Annual Average Daily Traffic station location AADT_2015: Estimated Annual Average Daily Traffic in vehicles per day for 2015AADT_2014: Estimated Annual Average Daily Traffic in vehicles per day for 2014AADT_2013: Estimated Annual Average Daily Traffic in vehicles per day for 2013 AADT_2012: Estimated Annual Average Daily Traffic in vehicles per day for 2012 AADT_2011: Estimated Annual Average Daily Traffic in vehicles per day for 2011 AADT_2010: Estimated Annual Average Daily Traffic in vehicles per day for 2010 AADT_2009: Estimated Annual Average Daily Traffic in vehicles per day for 2009 AADT_2008: Estimated Annual Average Daily Traffic in vehicles per day for 2008 AADT_2007: Estimated Annual Average Daily Traffic in vehicles per day for 2007 AADT_2006: Estimated Annual Average Daily Traffic in vehicles per day for 2006 AADT_2005: Estimated Annual Average Daily Traffic in vehicles per day for 2005 AADT_2004: Estimated Annual Average Daily Traffic in vehicles per day for 2004 AADT_2003: Estimated Annual Average Daily Traffic in vehicles per day for 2003 AADT_2002: Estimated Annual Average Daily Traffic in vehicles per day for 2002 Note: A value of zero in the AADT field indicates no available AADT data for that year. Please note the following: Not ALL roads have PTC stations located on them. With the exception of Interstate, NC and US routes, NCDOT County Maps refer to roads using a four digit Secondary Road Number, not a road’s local name. If additional information is needed, or an issue with the data is identified, please contact the Traffic Survey Group at 919 814-5116. Disclaimer related to the spatial accuracy of this file: Data in this file was digitized referencing the available NCDOT GIS Data Layer, LRS Arcs Shapefile Format from Quarter 1 release and is not the result of using GPS equipment in the field.North Carolina Department of Transportation shall not be held liable for any errors in this data. This includes errors of omission, commission, errors concerning the content of data, and relative positional accuracy of the data. This data cannot be construed to be a legal document.

Linear network representing the estimated traffic flows for roads and highways managed by the Ministry of Transport and Sustainable Mobility (MTMD). These flows are obtained using a statistical estimation method applied to data from more than 4,500 collection sites spread over the main roads of Quebec. It includes DJMA (annual average daily flow), DJME (summer average daily flow), DJME (summer average daily flow (June, July, August, September) and DJMH (average daily winter flow (December, January, February, March) as well as other traffic data. It is important to note that these values are calculated for total traffic directions. Interactive map: Some files are accessible by querying a section of traffic à la carte with a click (the file links are displayed in the descriptive table that is displayed when clicking): • Historical aggregated data (PDF) • Annual reports for permanent sites (PDF and Excel) • Hourly data (hourly average per weekday per month) (Excel) • Annual reports for permanent sites (PDF and Excel) • Hourly data (hourly average per weekday per month) (Excel)**This third party metadata element was translated using an automated translation tool (Amazon Translate).**

The Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) is the estimated mean daily traffic volume and the Commercial Annual Average Daily Traffic (CAADT) is the estimated mean daily traffic volume for commercial vehicles. For continuous sites, estimates are calculated by summing the Annual Average Days of the Week and dividing by seven. For short-count sites, estimates are made by factoring a short count using Seasonal and Axle (if applicable) day-of-week adjustment factors.Data Coverage: The dataset covers the entire Federal Aid System in the State of Michigan Update Cycle: AADT & CAADT volumes are created and released every year.Transportation Data Management System (TDMS) AADT Calculation HelpTraffic Monitoring Program

The Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) is the estimated mean daily traffic volume and the Commercial Annual Average Daily Traffic (CAADT) is the estimated mean daily traffic volume for commercial vehicles. For continuous sites, estimates are calculated by summing the Annual Average Days of the Week and dividing by seven. For short-count sites, estimates are made by factoring a short count using Seasonal and Axle (if applicable) day-of-week adjustment factors.

Data Coverage: The dataset covers the entire Federal Aid System in the State of Michigan

Update Cycle: AADT & CAADT volumes are created and released every year.

Transportation Data Management System (TDMS) AADT Calculation Help

Traffic Monitoring Program

alexa.com is ranked #34662 in MX with 62.5K Traffic. Categories: Advertising and Marketing, Computer Software and Development, Information Technology, Online Services. Learn more about website traffic, market share, and more!

Data dictionary: Page_Title: Title of webpage used for pages of the website www.cityofrochester.gov Pageviews: Total number of pages viewed over the course of the calendar year listed in the year column. Repeated views of a single page are counted. Unique_Pageviews: Unique Pageviews - The number of sessions during which a specified page was viewed at least once. A unique pageview is counted for each URL and page title combination. Avg_Time: Average amount of time users spent looking at a specified page or screen. Entrances: The number of times visitors entered the website through a specified page.Bounce_Rate: " A bounce is a single-page session on your site. In Google Analytics, a bounce is calculated specifically as a session that triggers only a single request to the Google Analytics server, such as when a user opens a single page on your site and then exits without triggering any other requests to the Google Analytics server during that session. Bounce rate is single-page sessions on a page divided by all sessions that started with that page, or the percentage of all sessions on your site in which users viewed only a single page and triggered only a single request to the Google Analytics server. These single-page sessions have a session duration of 0 seconds since there are no subsequent hits after the first one that would let Google Analytics calculate the length of the session. "Exit_Rate: The number of exits from a page divided by the number of pageviews for the page. This is inclusive of sessions that started on different pages, as well as “bounce” sessions that start and end on the same page. For all pageviews to the page, Exit Rate is the percentage that were the last in the session. Year: Calendar year over which the data was collected. Data reflects the counts for each metric from January 1st through December 31st.