Ethanol rose to 1.76 USD/Gal on August 15, 2025, up 1.88% from the previous day. Over the past month, Ethanol's price has fallen 0.85%, and is down 2.90% compared to the same time last year, according to trading on a contract for difference (CFD) that tracks the benchmark market for this commodity. Ethanol - values, historical data, forecasts and news - updated on August of 2025.

Why did the Ethanol Price Change in July 2025? North American Ethanol Price Index increased by 1% over Q1 2025 but eventually had a downward trend throughout Q2, with quarterly average valued at USD 593/MT, 99% FOB Texas, as the market weakened despite initial-quarter strength.

In July 2023, the price of Ethanol decreased by 4.4% to $632 per thousand litres (FOB, Brazil) compared to the previous month.

Get the latest insights on price movement and trend analysis of Bioethanol in different regions across the world (Asia, Europe, North America, Latin America, and the Middle East Africa).

Explore the factors affecting ethanol prices in 2023, including production costs, market demand, regulatory influences, and international trade. Discover why ethanol prices fluctuate between $600 to $800 per ton and how these dynamics impact the energy sector.

The price of Ethanol in India, CIF, declined by -82.3% to $753 per thousand litres in March 2023 compared to the previous month.

The world benchmark for fuel ethanol - U.S. Omaha wholesale price - stood at 50.2 U.S. dollars per barrel in 2024. This annual average was lower than in the previous two years, after rising to a high of 70.75 per barrel in 2022.

The average ethanol import price in the EU surged to $1,076 per ton in 2021.

Ethanol Price in the UK - 2023. Find the latest marketing data on the IndexBox platform.

Ethanol Price in Pakistan - 2023. Find the latest marketing data on the IndexBox platform.

Methanol fell to 2,286 CNY/T on August 18, 2025, down 1.30% from the previous day. Over the past month, Methanol's price has fallen 3.99%, and is down 5.15% compared to the same time last year, according to trading on a contract for difference (CFD) that tracks the benchmark market for this commodity. This dataset includes a chart with historical data for Methanol.

aAverage price of sweet sorghum was around US $ 30/t as reported [52].bBiomass loaded fee is US $ 1.10/t and then US $ 0.103/t/km transported [51], therefore, the transport cost of our plant is around US $ 2.13/t (the maximum feedstock collection radius is 10 km).cUsing SO2 for storage, the cost is around US $ 5/t.dThe capital cost and other fees were the same as reported [52].

Ethanol Price in Australia - 2023. Find the latest marketing data on the IndexBox platform.

In 2024, the Pakistani ethanol market decreased by -14.7% to $1.7B for the first time since 2018, thus ending a five-year rising trend. Over the period under review, consumption enjoyed a moderate increase. Over the period under review, the market hit record highs at $2B in 2023, and then declined in the following year.

Dataset Information

This dataset includes daily price data for various commodities.

  Instruments Included

BDIY: Baltic Dry Index BEEF: Beef (dollars per pound) BIT: Bitumen (dollars per metric ton) C1: Corn (dollars per bushel) CC1: Cocoa (dollars per metric ton) CHE: Cheese (dollars per pound) CL1: Crude Oil (dollars per barrel) CO1: Brent Crude Oil (dollars per barrel) CRYTR: CRB Index CT1: Cotton (cents per pound) DA: Milk (dollars per hundredweight) DL1: Ethanol… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/paperswithbacktest/Commodities-Daily-Price.

Ethanol Price in South Africa - 2023. Find the latest marketing data on the IndexBox platform.

Release Date: 2014-12-09...Table Name. Geographic Area Series: Shipment Characteristics by Commodity by Mode by Distance Shipped for the United States: 2012 ....ReleaseSchedule. The data in this file are scheduled for release in December 2014.....Key TableInformation.None.....Universe. The 2012 Commodity Flow Survey (CFS) covers business establishments with paid employees that are located in the United States and are classified using the 2007 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) in mining, manufacturing, wholesale trade, and selected retail trade and services industries, namely, electronic shopping and mail-order houses, fuel dealers, and publishers. Establishments classified in transportation, construction, and all other retail and services industries are excluded from the survey. Farms, fisheries, foreign establishments, and most government-owned establishments are also excluded.The survey also covers auxiliary establishments (i.e., warehouses and managing offices) of multi-establishments companies..For the 2012 CFS, an advance survey (pre-canvass) of approximately 100,000 establishments was conducted to identify establishments with shipping activity and to try. and obtain an accurate measure of their shipping activity. Surveyed establishments that indicated undertaking shipping activities and the non-respondents to the pre-canvass.were included in the CFS sample universe....GeographyCoverage. The data are shown at the U.S level.....IndustryCoverage.None.....Data ItemsandOtherIdentifyingRecords. This file contains data on:..Value ($ Millions).Tons (Thousands).Ton-miles (Millions).Coefficient of variation or standard error for all above data items. .The data are shown by commodity code (COMM), mode of transportation (DMODE), and shipment distance (SHIPDIST)......Sort Order.Data are presented in ascending geography (GEO_ID) by COMM by DMODE by SHIPDIST sequence.....FTP Download. Download the entire table at Table 11 FTP. ....ContactInformation.U.S. Census Bureau.Commodity Flow Survey.Tel: (301)763-2108.Email: erd.cfs@census.gov...The estimates presented are based on data from the 2012 Commodity Flow Surveys (CFS) and supersede data previously released in the 2012 CFS Preliminary Report. These estimates only cover businesses with paid employees. All dollar values are expressed in current dollars, i.e., they are based on price levels in effect at the time of the sample. Estimates may not be additive due to rounding. ...For information on Commodity Flow Survey geographies, including changes for 2012, see Census Geographies. .Symbols:.S - Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling variability, poor response quality, or other concerns about the estimate quality. Unpublished estimates derived from this table by subtraction are subject to these same limitations and should not be attributed to the U.S. Census Bureau. For a description of publication standards and the total quantity response rate, see link to program methodology page..Z - Rounds to Zero..X - Not Applicable..For a complete list of all economic programs symbols, see the Symbols Glossary..Commodity Code changes for 2012 CFS.. (CFS10) 07-R - Prior to the 2012 CFS, oils and fats treated for use as biodiesel were included in Commodity Code 07. In the 2012 CFS, oils and fats treated for use as biodiesel moved to Commodity Code 18. . (CFS20) 08-R - Prior to the 2012 CFS, alcohols intended for use as fuel such as ethanol, although not specifically identified, were included in Commodity Code 08. In the 2012 CFS, ethanol moved to Commodity Code 17. . (CFS30) 17-R - Prior to the 2012 CFS, fuel alcohols such as ethanol were included in Commodity Code 08, although not specifically identified. Also, kerosene was included in Commodity Code 19. In the 2012 CFS, ethanol, fuel alcohols and kerosene moved to Commodity Code 17. . (CFS40) 18-R - Prior to the 2012 CFS, biodiesel, although not specifically identified, was included in Commodity Code 07. In the 2012 CFS, biodiesel moved to Commodity Code 18. .Source: U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics and U.S. Census Bureau, 2012 Commodity Flow Survey. .Note: The noise infusion data protection method has been applied to prevent data disclosure, and to protect respondent's confidentiality. Estimates are based on a sample of establishments and are subject to both sampling and nonsampling error. Estimated measures of sampling variability are provided in the tables. For information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, and nonsampling error see Survey Methodology.

Release Date: 2014-12-09...Table Name. Hazardous Materials Series: HazMat Shipment Characteristics by Commodity by Mode by Intrastate vs. Interstate for the United States: 2012....ReleaseSchedule. The data in this file are scheduled for release in December 2014.....Key TableInformation.None.....Universe. The 2012 Commodity Flow Survey (CFS) covers business establishments with paid employees that are located in the United States and are classified using the 2007 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) in mining, manufacturing, wholesale trade, and selected retail trade and services industries, namely, electronic shopping and mail-order houses, fuel dealers, and publishers. Establishments classified in transportation, construction, and all other retail and services industries are excluded from the survey. Farms, fisheries, foreign establishments, and most government-owned establishments are also excluded. The survey also covers auxiliary establishments (i.e., warehouses and managing offices) of multi-establishments companies. For the 2012 CFS, an advance survey (pre-canvass) of approximately 100,000 establishments was conducted to identify establishments with shipping activity and to try and obtain an accurate measure of their shipping activity. Surveyed establishments that indicated undertaking shipping activities and the non-respondents to the pre-canvass were included in the CFS sample universe....GeographyCoverage.The data are shown at the U.S. level only.....IndustryCoverage.None.....Data ItemsandOtherIdentifyingRecords. This file contains data on:..Value ($ Millions).Tons (Thousands).Ton-miles (Millions).Average miles per shipment (number).Coefficient of variation for all above data items. .The data are shown by commodity code (COMM), mode of transportation (DMODE), and intrastate vs. interstate status (INTSTAT)......Sort Order.Data are presented in ascending COMM by DMODE by INTSTAT sequence.....FTP Download. Download the entire table at Table H12 FTP. ....ContactInformation.U.S. Census Bureau.Commodity Flow Survey.Tel: (301)763-2108.Email: erd.cfs@census.gov...The estimates presented are based on data from the 2012 Commodity Flow Surveys (CFS) and supersede data previously released in the 2012 CFS Preliminary Report. These estimates only cover businesses with paid employees. All dollar values are expressed in current dollars, i.e., they are based on price levels in effect at the time of the sample. Estimates may not be additive due to rounding. ...For information on Commodity Flow Survey geographies, including changes for 2012, see Census Geographies. .Symbols:.S - Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling variability, poor response quality, or other concerns about the estimate quality. Unpublished estimates derived from this table by subtraction are subject to these same limitations and should not be attributed to the U.S. Census Bureau. For a description of publication standards and the total quantity response rate, see link to program methodology page..Z - Rounds to Zero..X - Not Applicable..For a complete list of all economic programs symbols, see the Symbols Glossary..Source: U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics and U.S. Census Bureau, 2012 Commodity Flow Survey. .Note: The noise infusion data protection method has been applied to prevent data disclosure, and to protect respondent's confidentiality. Estimates are based on a sample of establishments and are subject to both sampling and nonsampling error. Estimated measures of sampling variability are provided in the tables. For information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, and nonsampling error see Survey Methodology..Commodity Code changes for 2012 CFS.. (CFS10) 07-R - Prior to the 2012 CFS, oils and fats treated for use as biodiesel were included in Commodity Code 07. In the 2012 CFS, oils and fats treated for use as biodiesel moved to Commodity Code 18. . (CFS20) 08-R - Prior to the 2012 CFS, alcohols intended for use as fuel such as ethanol, although not specifically identified, were included in Commodity Code 08. In the 2012 CFS, ethanol moved to Commodity Code 17. . (CFS30) 17-R - Prior to the 2012 CFS, fuel alcohols such as ethanol were included in Commodity Code 08, although not specifically identified. Also, kerosene was included in Commodity Code 19. In the 2012 CFS, ethanol, fuel alcohols and kerosene moved to Commodity Code 17. . (CFS40) 18-R - Prior to the 2012 CFS, biodiesel, although not specifically identified, was included in Commodity Code 07. In the 2012 CFS, biodiesel moved to Commodity Code 18.

Scalable, low-cost biofuel and biochemical production can accelerate progress on the path to a more circular carbon economy and reduced dependence on crude oil. Rather than producing a single fuel product, lignocellulosic biorefineries have the potential to serve as hubs for the production of fuels, production of petrochemical replacements, and treatment of high-moisture organic waste. A detailed techno-economic analysis and life-cycle greenhouse gas assessment are developed to explore the cost and emission impacts of integrated corn stover-to-ethanol biorefineries that incorporate both codigestion of organic wastes and different strategies for utilizing biogas, including onsite energy generation, upgrading to bio-compressed natural gas (bioCNG), conversion to poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) bioplastic, and conversion to single-cell protein (SCP). We find that codigesting manure or a combination of manure and food waste alongside process wastewater can reduce the biorefinery’s total costs per metric ton of CO2 equivalent mitigated by half or more. Upgrading biogas to bioCNG is the most cost-effective climate mitigation strategy, while upgrading biogas to PHB or SCP is competitive with combusting biogas onsite.

Global sugar manufacturers have endured fluctuations in global sugar prices over the five years to 2024. Nonetheless, global sugar manufacturers' revenue is anticipated to strengthen at a CAGR of 5.6% to $83.2 billion over the five years to 2024, including a drop of 8.5% in 2024. Brazil is very influential in the industry's health. The country produces and exports the most sugar of any nation and is also the second-largest producer of ethanol, which is often produced from sugarcane. As energy prices have strengthened over the past five years, Brazil has expansively diverted more of its sugar stock toward ethanol production. Brazil's changing production and export levels have impacted the world supply of sugar, which, in turn, has disturbed world sugar prices. For example, prior to the current period, in 2011, when Brazil cut its production of sugar by 2.0 million tons, the world price of sugar shot up 25.6%; the following year, as Brazil boosted production by more than 2.0 million tons, the world price of sugar dropped 18.5%. These fluctuations in production, coupled with other countries following Brazil's lead and diverting their sugar stock toward ethanol production or other more valuable crops, have led revenue for the entire industry to endure intense volatility during the current five-year period. Profit, measured as earnings before interest and taxes, inched upward to 6.1% of revenue in 2024. These factors are expected to continue driving volatility in the world price of sugar and global sugar manufacturers' revenue over the five years to 2029. Despite ongoing fluctuations, the world price of sugar will moderately drop as global demand for sugar and sugar-heavy products dips, along with lower energy prices, which will likely prompt demand for alternative fuel sources, like ethanol. Also, as demand from developing nations continues to swell and as trade barriers are expansively removed, global production and international trade of sugar will strengthen. As a result of these factors, global sugar manufacturers' revenue will drop at a CAGR of an estimated 1.2% over the next five years to $78.5 billion in 2029.