Ethereum's price history suggests that that crypto was worth more in 2025 than during late 2021, although nowhere near the highest price recorded. Much like Bitcoin (BTC), the price of ETH went up in 2021 but for different reasons altogether: Ethereum, for instance, hit the news when a digital art piece was sold as the world's most expensive NFT for over 38,000 ETH - or 69.3 million U.S. dollars. Unlike Bitcoin, of which the price growth was fueled by the IPO of the U.S.'s biggest crypto trader, Coinbase, the rally on Ethereum came from technological developments that caused much excitement among traders. First, the so-called 'Berlin update' rolled out on the Ethereum network in April 2021, an update that would eventually lead to the Ethereum Merge in 2022 and reduced ETH gas prices - or reduced transaction fees. The collapse of FTX in late 2022, however, changed much for the cryptocurrency. As of July 22, 2025, Ethereum was worth 3,765.45 U.S. dollars - significantly less than the 4,400 U.S. dollars by the end of 2021.Ethereum's future and the DeFi industryPrice developments on Ethereum are difficult to predict but cannot be seen without the world of DeFi, or decentralized finance. This industry used technology to remove intermediaries between parties in a financial transaction. One example includes crypto wallets such as Coinbase Wallet that grew in popularity recently, with other examples including smart contractor Uniswap, Maker (responsible for stablecoin DAI), moneylender Dharma and market protocol Compound. Ethereum's future developments are tied with this industry: Unlike Bitcoin and Ripple, Ethereum is technically not a currency but an open-source software platform for blockchain applications, with Ether being the cryptocurrency that is used inside the Ethereum network. Essentially, Ethereum facilitates DeFi, meaning that if DeFi does well, so does Ethereum.NFTs: the most well-known application of EthereumNFTs or non-fungible tokens, grew nearly tenfold between 2018 and 2020, as can be seen in the market cap of NFTs worldwide. These digital blockchain assets can essentially function as a unique code connected to a digital file, allowing to distinguish the original file from any potential copies. This application is especially prominent in crypto art, although there are other applications: gaming, sports, and collectibles are other segments where NFT sales occur.

In April 2021, the Ethereum market cap reached new heights and grew to over *** billion U.S. dollars - the first time this cryptocurrency achieved that feat. The market capitalization in August 2020 was half this amount. Market capitalization is calculated by multiplying the total number of Ethereum in circulation by the Ethereum price. Compared to the Bitcoin market capitalization, however, Ethereum was not yet as popular.

Prices for ETHUSC Ether USD Coin including live quotes, historical charts and news. ETHUSC Ether USD Coin was last updated by Trading Economics this July 31 of 2025.

Ethereum's price history suggests that that crypto was worth more in 2025 than during late 2021, although nowhere near the highest price recorded. Much like Bitcoin (BTC), the price of ETH went up in 2021 but for different reasons altogether: Ethereum, for instance, hit the news when a digital art piece was sold as the world's most expensive NFT for over 38,000 ETH - or 69.3 million U.S. dollars. Unlike Bitcoin, of which the price growth was fueled by the IPO of the U.S.'s biggest crypto trader, Coinbase, the rally on Ethereum came from technological developments that caused much excitement among traders. First, the so-called 'Berlin update' rolled out on the Ethereum network in April 2021, an update that would eventually lead to the Ethereum Merge in 2022 and reduced ETH gas prices - or reduced transaction fees. The collapse of FTX in late 2022, however, changed much for the cryptocurrency. As of July 29, 2025, Ethereum was worth 3,786.3 U.S. dollars - significantly less than the 4,400 U.S. dollars by the end of 2021.Ethereum's future and the DeFi industryPrice developments on Ethereum are difficult to predict but cannot be seen without the world of DeFi, or decentralized finance. This industry used technology to remove intermediaries between parties in a financial transaction. One example includes crypto wallets such as Coinbase Wallet that grew in popularity recently, with other examples including smart contractor Uniswap, Maker (responsible for stablecoin DAI), moneylender Dharma and market protocol Compound. Ethereum's future developments are tied with this industry: Unlike Bitcoin and Ripple, Ethereum is technically not a currency but an open-source software platform for blockchain applications, with Ether being the cryptocurrency that is used inside the Ethereum network. Essentially, Ethereum facilitates DeFi, meaning that if DeFi does well, so does Ethereum.NFTs: the most well-known application of EthereumNFTs or non-fungible tokens, grew nearly tenfold between 2018 and 2020, as can be seen in the market cap of NFTs worldwide. These digital blockchain assets can essentially function as a unique code connected to a digital file, allowing to distinguish the original file from any potential copies. This application is especially prominent in crypto art, although there are other applications: gaming, sports, and collectibles are other segments where NFT sales occur.

By March 2022, over *** million Ethereum tokens were issued and in active circulation - but it is expected new coins will not arrive at a fast pace. Although the cryptocurrency has an unlimited supply - unlike Bitcoin, of which there can only be ** million tokens and not a single more - the Ethereum blockchain received an update in August 2021, EIP-1559, that both increased the block size needed to create new coins and destroyed (“burned”) any transactions fees, rather than send them to the original miners. This led to a decline in issuance, as mining Ethereum essentially was made less profitable. Issuance is expected to decline further when Ethereum *** arrives.

Ethereum: a counter to inflation?

In a time when inflation rates became a big talking point, Ethereum received much social media attention in late 2021 for possibly being deflationary. This argument stems from August 2021, or “London Hard Fork”, upgrade in August 2021: Each transaction on the Ethereum network would entirely remove a portion of Ethereum from the total supply in circulation. On days of high transaction activity of Ethereum, for example, after a change in the price of Ethereum, this can effectively mean more coins are being destroyed than there are being created.

Ethereum supply to change after the upgrade to ***?

Experts state burning on a scale that the supply of Ethereum declines only happens on occasion, stating it acts more as a temporary slowdown of growth rather than an active attempt to continuously shrink supply. This could change, however, when Ethereum *** arrives – or when Ethereum switches from Proof-of-Work (PoW) to Proof-of-Stake (PoS). The general assumption for this is that staking rewards are generally lower than rewards for Proof-of-Work (mining), lowering the incentive for the creation of new coins. If usage – which some measure via the Ethereum gas price, or transaction fee per transaction – remains unchanged otherwise, this would lower the threshold for Ethereum to become deflationary.

Ethereum's price history suggests that that crypto was worth more in 2025 than during late 2021, although nowhere near the highest price recorded. Much like Bitcoin (BTC), the price of ETH went up in 2021 but for different reasons altogether: Ethereum, for instance, hit the news when a digital art piece was sold as the world's most expensive NFT for over 38,000 ETH - or 69.3 million U.S. dollars. Unlike Bitcoin, of which the price growth was fueled by the IPO of the U.S.'s biggest crypto trader, Coinbase, the rally on Ethereum came from technological developments that caused much excitement among traders. First, the so-called 'Berlin update' rolled out on the Ethereum network in April 2021, an update that would eventually lead to the Ethereum Merge in 2022 and reduced ETH gas prices - or reduced transaction fees. The collapse of FTX in late 2022, however, changed much for the cryptocurrency. As of July 30, 2025, Ethereum was worth 3,788.6 U.S. dollars - significantly less than the 4,400 U.S. dollars by the end of 2021.Ethereum's future and the DeFi industryPrice developments on Ethereum are difficult to predict but cannot be seen without the world of DeFi, or decentralized finance. This industry used technology to remove intermediaries between parties in a financial transaction. One example includes crypto wallets such as Coinbase Wallet that grew in popularity recently, with other examples including smart contractor Uniswap, Maker (responsible for stablecoin DAI), moneylender Dharma and market protocol Compound. Ethereum's future developments are tied with this industry: Unlike Bitcoin and Ripple, Ethereum is technically not a currency but an open-source software platform for blockchain applications, with Ether being the cryptocurrency that is used inside the Ethereum network. Essentially, Ethereum facilitates DeFi, meaning that if DeFi does well, so does Ethereum.NFTs: the most well-known application of EthereumNFTs or non-fungible tokens, grew nearly tenfold between 2018 and 2020, as can be seen in the market cap of NFTs worldwide. These digital blockchain assets can essentially function as a unique code connected to a digital file, allowing to distinguish the original file from any potential copies. This application is especially prominent in crypto art, although there are other applications: gaming, sports, and collectibles are other segments where NFT sales occur.

This dataset contains the transaction history for the first 10,000,000 blocks of the Ethereum Blockchain. The dataset is structured into 10 consecutive CSV files, which sequentially hold the transactions of 1,000,000 blocks. The information stored for each transaction includes the sending and receiving addresses of the transaction, the transferred value, the corresponding block number, a timestamp, and further information about the target address.

This dataset contains the transaction history for the first 10,000,000 blocks of the Ethereum Blockchain. The dataset is structured into 10 consecutive CSV files, which sequentially hold the transactions of 1,000,000 blocks. The information stored for each transaction includes the sending and receiving addresses of the transaction, the transferred value, the corresponding block number, a timestamp, and further information about the target address.

Ethereum became increasingly volatile as ************* progressed, recording percentages that were nearly twice as high in the beginning of the month. Some source attributes these price fluctuations to planned tax regulations found within a U.S. infrastructure bill that might have repercussions for crypto investors. Measured in a metric called volatility, the percentage shown here reflect how much the price of Ethereum in U.S. dollars changed historically over a preceding 10-day window. Changes can be either up or down, with a higher volatility reflecting that an asset is more risky, as price movements are less easy to predict and can swing in any direction.

The recent technological advent of cryptocurrencies and their respective benefits have been shrouded with a number of illegal activities operating over the network such as money laundering, bribery, phishing, fraud, among others. In this work we focus on the Ethereum network, which has seen over 400 million transactions since its inception. Using 2179 accounts flagged by the Ethereum community for their illegal activity coupled with 2502 normal accounts, we seek to detect illicit accounts based on their transaction history using the XGBoost classifier. Using 10 fold cross-validation, XGBoost achieved an average accuracy of 0.963 ( ± 0.006) with an average AUC of 0.994 ( ± 0.0007). The top three features with the largest impact on the final model output were established to be ‘Time diff between first and last (Mins)’, ‘Total Ether balance’ and ‘Min value received’. Based on the results we conclude that the proposed approach is highly effective in detecting illicit accounts over the Ethereum network. Our contribution is multi-faceted; firstly, we propose an effective method to detect illicit accounts over the Ethereum network; secondly, we provide insights about the most important features; and thirdly, we publish the compiled data set as a benchmark for future related works.

Ethereum / transactions 2021-10 (Blockchair data). Documentaion and terms of use available at https://blockchair.com/dumps Speed limit filter https://gz.blockchair.com/README.html License: CC-BY 4.0

Ethereum trading volume more than doubled on May 19, 2021, compared to the previous day, following news that China banned crypto services inside the country. Following this news, the market cap for the entire crypto market fell by billions of U.S. dollars. The Ethereum price that day also witnessed one of its biggest single-day declines on record. The price decline potentially may have attracted new investors to the cryptocurrency, leading to the increase in trading volume.

Cryptocurrency historical datasets from January 2012 (if available) to October 2021 were obtained and integrated from various sources and Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) including Yahoo Finance, Cryptodownload, CoinMarketCap, various Kaggle datasets, and multiple APIs. While these datasets used various formats of time (e.g., minutes, hours, days), in order to integrate the datasets days format was used for in this research study. The integrated cryptocurrency historical datasets for 80 cryptocurrencies including but not limited to Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), Binance Coin (BNB), Cardano (ADA), Tether (USDT), Ripple (XRP), Solana (SOL), Polkadot (DOT), USD Coin (USDC), Dogecoin (DOGE), Tron (TRX), Bitcoin Cash (BCH), Litecoin (LTC), EOS (EOS), Cosmos (ATOM), Stellar (XLM), Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC), Uniswap (UNI), Terra (LUNA), SHIBA INU (SHIB), and 60 more cryptocurrencies were uploaded in this online Mendeley data repository. Although the primary attribute of including the mentioned cryptocurrencies was the Market Capitalization, a subject matter expert i.e., a professional trader has also guided the initial selection of the cryptocurrencies by analyzing various indicators such as Relative Strength Index (RSI), Moving Average Convergence/Divergence (MACD), MYC Signals, Bollinger Bands, Fibonacci Retracement, Stochastic Oscillator and Ichimoku Cloud. The primary features of this dataset that were used as the decision-making criteria of the CLUS-MCDA II approach are Timestamps, Open, High, Low, Closed, Volume (Currency), % Change (7 days and 24 hours), Market Cap and Weighted Price values. The available excel and CSV files in this data set are just part of the integrated data and other databases, datasets and API References that was used in this study are as follows: [1] https://finance.yahoo.com/ [2] https://coinmarketcap.com/historical/ [3] https://cryptodatadownload.com/ [4] https://kaggle.com/philmohun/cryptocurrency-financial-data [5] https://kaggle.com/deepshah16/meme-cryptocurrency-historical-data [6] https://kaggle.com/sudalairajkumar/cryptocurrencypricehistory [7] https://min-api.cryptocompare.com/data/price?fsym=BTC&tsyms=USD [8] https://min-api.cryptocompare.com/ [9] https://p.nomics.com/cryptocurrency-bitcoin-api [10] https://www.coinapi.io/ [11] https://www.coingecko.com/en/api [12] https://cryptowat.ch/ [13] https://www.alphavantage.co/

This dataset is part of the CLUS-MCDA (Cluster analysis for improving Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis) and CLUS-MCDAII Project: https://aimaghsoodi.github.io/CLUSMCDA-R-Package/ https://github.com/Aimaghsoodi/CLUS-MCDA-II https://github.com/azadkavian/CLUS-MCDA

[ Derived from parent entry - See data hierarchy tab ]

decadal1983 is an experiment of the CMIP5 - Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 ( https://pcmdi.llnl.gov/mips/cmip5 ). CMIP5 is meant to provide a framework for coordinated climate change experiments for the next five years and thus includes simulations for assessment in the IPCC AR5. This subset of the CMIP5 additional historical data were collected by the ETH Zurich until 15th March 2013 in support of IPCC AR5 Working Group 1 ( http://wiki.c2sm.ethz.ch/COSMO/CMIP5 ). These data are part of the IPCC-DDC AR5.

decadal1983 (10-year hindcast/prediction initialized in year 1983) - Version 2: The atmospheric composition (and other conditions) should be prescribed as in the historical run (expt. 3.2) and the RCP4.5 scenario (expt. 4.1) of the long-term suite of experiments. Ocean initial conditions should be in some way representative of the observed anomalies or full fields for the start date. Land, sea-ice and atmosphere initial conditions are left to the discretion of each group.

Experiment design: https://pcmdi.llnl.gov/mips/cmip5/experiment_design.html List of output variables: https://pcmdi.llnl.gov/mips/cmip5/datadescription.html Output: time series per variable in model grid spatial resolution in netCDF format Earth System model and the simulation information: CIM repository

Data are structured and entry names are set according to the ETH Zurich Archive layout: "experiment/MIP table/variable/model/ensemble member/CMOR filename.nc"

[ Derived from parent entry - See data hierarchy tab ]

decadal1968 is an experiment of the CMIP5 - Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 ( https://pcmdi.llnl.gov/mips/cmip5 ). CMIP5 is meant to provide a framework for coordinated climate change experiments for the next five years and thus includes simulations for assessment in the IPCC AR5. This subset of the CMIP5 additional historical data were collected by the ETH Zurich until 15th March 2013 in support of IPCC AR5 Working Group 1 ( http://wiki.c2sm.ethz.ch/COSMO/CMIP5 ). These data are part of the IPCC-DDC AR5.

decadal1968 (10-year hindcast/prediction initialized in year 1968) - Version 2: The atmospheric composition (and other conditions) should be prescribed as in the historical run (expt. 3.2) and the RCP4.5 scenario (expt. 4.1) of the long-term suite of experiments. Ocean initial conditions should be in some way representative of the observed anomalies or full fields for the start date. Land, sea-ice and atmosphere initial conditions are left to the discretion of each group.

Experiment design: https://pcmdi.llnl.gov/mips/cmip5/experiment_design.html List of output variables: https://pcmdi.llnl.gov/mips/cmip5/datadescription.html Output: time series per variable in model grid spatial resolution in netCDF format Earth System model and the simulation information: CIM repository

Data are structured and entry names are set according to the ETH Zurich Archive layout: "experiment/MIP table/variable/model/ensemble member/CMOR filename.nc"

[ Derived from parent entry - See data hierarchy tab ]

decadal1965 is an experiment of the CMIP5 - Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 ( https://pcmdi.llnl.gov/mips/cmip5 ). CMIP5 is meant to provide a framework for coordinated climate change experiments for the next five years and thus includes simulations for assessment in the IPCC AR5. This subset of the CMIP5 additional historical data were collected by the ETH Zurich until 15th March 2013 in support of IPCC AR5 Working Group 1 ( http://wiki.c2sm.ethz.ch/COSMO/CMIP5 ). These data are part of the IPCC-DDC AR5.

decadal1965 (10-year hindcast/prediction initialized in year 1965) - Version 3: The atmospheric composition (and other conditions) should be prescribed as in the historical run (expt. 3.2) and the RCP4.5 scenario (expt. 4.1) of the long-term suite of experiments. Ocean initial conditions should be in some way representative of the observed anomalies or full fields for the start date. Land, sea-ice and atmosphere initial conditions are left to the discretion of each group.

Experiment design: https://pcmdi.llnl.gov/mips/cmip5/experiment_design.html List of output variables: https://pcmdi.llnl.gov/mips/cmip5/datadescription.html Output: time series per variable in model grid spatial resolution in netCDF format Earth System model and the simulation information: CIM repository

Data are structured and entry names are set according to the ETH Zurich Archive layout: "experiment/MIP table/variable/model/ensemble member/CMOR filename.nc"

Bitcoin and Ethereum together made up more than **** of the crypto market in 2024, with newer coins losing out. One example is Polkadot or DOT, an altcoin that went live in August 2020 but, at first, increasingly attracting interest in 2021 as it was considered a viable competitor to Ethereum's blockchain structure. Indeed, six months after its initial release, the value of Polkadot was already *** times higher than it during its launch. By 2024, the market position of Ethereum had not changed that much.

PPG 10 Methyl Glucose Ether Market Outlook

The global PPG 10 Methyl Glucose Ether market size was valued at approximately USD 1.2 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach around USD 2.4 billion by 2032, growing at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 7.5% during the forecast period from 2024 to 2032. This significant growth is primarily driven by the increasing demand for eco-friendly and sustainable ingredients in personal care products, coupled with rising consumer awareness regarding the benefits of using naturally derived compounds.

One of the primary growth factors for the PPG 10 Methyl Glucose Ether market is the expanding personal care and cosmetics industry. As consumers become more health-conscious and environmentally aware, there is a growing preference for products that utilize natural and biodegradable ingredients. PPG 10 Methyl Glucose Ether, being derived from natural glucose, fits well into this trend. Its usage in various personal care formulations such as moisturizers, shampoos, and conditioners is on the rise due to its excellent moisturizing and emulsifying properties, which enhance the texture and efficacy of these products.

Another significant growth driver is the burgeoning pharmaceutical industry. PPG 10 Methyl Glucose Ether is increasingly being used as an excipient in various pharmaceutical formulations due to its non-toxic and biocompatible nature. Its ability to improve the solubility and stability of active pharmaceutical ingredients makes it a valuable component in drug development and delivery systems. With the global pharmaceutical market continually expanding, driven by an aging population and increasing prevalence of chronic diseases, the demand for such versatile excipients is expected to rise substantially.

Furthermore, the industrial applications of PPG 10 Methyl Glucose Ether are contributing to market growth. Its utilization in the production of resins, adhesives, and coatings is gaining traction due to its superior chemical stability and compatibility with various other components. The industrial sector's continuous pursuit of sustainable and high-performance materials is expected to further fuel the demand for PPG 10 Methyl Glucose Ether in the coming years.

Regionally, Asia Pacific is anticipated to be the fastest-growing market for PPG 10 Methyl Glucose Ether during the forecast period. This growth can be attributed to the rapidly expanding personal care and pharmaceutical industries in countries like China and India. North America and Europe are also significant markets, driven by high consumer awareness and stringent regulations promoting the use of eco-friendly and sustainable ingredients. The Middle East & Africa and Latin America regions are expected to witness moderate growth, supported by increasing industrial activities and rising disposable incomes.

In the realm of personal care and cosmetics, PEG-20 Methyl Glucose Sesquistearate is gaining recognition as a versatile and effective ingredient. Known for its excellent emulsifying properties, it helps to stabilize formulations and improve the texture of creams and lotions. This compound is derived from natural glucose and stearic acid, making it an attractive choice for manufacturers aiming to create products with a natural and eco-friendly profile. As consumers continue to demand transparency and sustainability in their beauty products, the inclusion of PEG-20 Methyl Glucose Sesquistearate aligns well with these market trends, offering both functionality and a green label.

Product Type Analysis

The PPG 10 Methyl Glucose Ether market is segmented by product type into cosmetic grade, pharmaceutical grade, and industrial grade. The cosmetic grade segment holds a significant share of the market, driven by the rising demand for natural and safe ingredients in personal care products. Cosmetic grade PPG 10 Methyl Glucose Ether is widely used in formulations such as creams, lotions, shampoos, and conditioners due to its excellent moisturizing and skin-conditioning properties. The growing consumer preference for organic and biodegradable cosmetics is further boosting the demand for cosmetic grade PPG 10 Methyl Glucose Ether.

The pharmaceutical grade segment is also witnessing robust growth, owing to its increasing use as an excipient in various drug formulations. Pharmaceutical grade PPG 10 Methyl Glucose Ether enhances the solubility, stability, and bioavailability of active phar

Ethereum / blocks 2024-10 (Blockchair data). Documentaion and terms of use available at https://blockchair.com/dumps Speed limit filter https://gz.blockchair.com/README.html License: CC-BY 4.0

The cryptocurrency mining hardware market is experiencing significant growth, driven by the increasing adoption of cryptocurrencies and the rising demand for mining services. While precise figures for market size and CAGR were not provided, based on industry reports and observed market trends, a reasonable estimation can be made. Let's assume a 2025 market size of $10 billion (this is an illustrative figure and should be replaced with actual data if available). Considering the volatile nature of the cryptocurrency market and technological advancements in mining hardware, a conservative Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 15% from 2025 to 2033 is plausible. This implies robust growth, with the market potentially exceeding $40 billion by 2033. Key drivers include the ongoing development and adoption of new cryptocurrencies, improvements in mining hardware efficiency (leading to reduced energy consumption and increased profitability), and the expansion of cloud-based mining services that make mining accessible to a wider audience. However, several restraints hinder the market's growth. The fluctuating prices of cryptocurrencies create uncertainty and impact profitability. The increasing energy consumption associated with mining is a significant environmental concern, leading to stricter regulations in some regions. Furthermore, the high initial investment costs for sophisticated mining hardware can be a barrier to entry for smaller players. The market is segmented by miner type (Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, and others) and application (miner leasing, hosting, pool operation, and individual consumers). Major players like Bitmain, Canaan, Ebang, Innosilicon, and MicroBT dominate the landscape, competing fiercely on factors such as hash rate, power efficiency, and pricing. Regional analysis shows a significant concentration in Asia Pacific, particularly China, due to favorable regulatory environments (prior to recent changes) and readily available low-cost power. However, growth is expected across all regions, with North America and Europe witnessing increased participation driven by institutional investment and growing interest in cryptocurrency. This comprehensive report provides an in-depth analysis of the global cryptocurrency miner market, a dynamic sector projected to reach multi-billion dollar valuations in the coming years. We delve into the market's intricacies, analyzing production, technological advancements, regulatory landscapes, and key players. This report is crucial for investors, manufacturers, and anyone seeking to understand the complexities and opportunities within this rapidly evolving market.