As of May 2025, there were 26,549 Hispanic candidates on the organ waiting list in the United States. Organ donation can be given through both a deceased and living donor if blood and oxygen are flowing through the organs until the time of recovery to ensure viability. There are over 100,000 people in the country waiting for an organ transplant. This statistic displays the number of candidates on organ donation waiting list in the United States, as of May 6, 2025, by race and ethnicity.

This layer shows the population broken down by race and Hispanic origin. Data is from US Census American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year estimates.To see the full list of attributes available in this service, go to the "Data" tab, and choose "Fields" at the top right (in ArcGIS Online). A ‘Null’ entry in the estimate indicates that data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small (per the U.S. Census).Vintage: 2018-2022ACS Table(s): B03002 (Not all lines of this ACS table are available in this feature layer.)Data downloaded from: Census Bureau's API for American Community Survey Data Preparation: Data table was downloaded and joined with Zip Code boundaries in the City of Tempe.Date of Census update: December 15, 2023National Figures: data.census.gov

About this dataset

Context

This list ranks the 50 states in the United States by Non-Hispanic Some Other Race (SOR) population, as estimated by the United States Census Bureau. It also highlights population changes in each states over the past five years.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates, including:

• 2019-2023 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2018-2022 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2017-2021 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2016-2020 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2015-2019 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Variables / Data Columns

• Rank by Non-Hispanic Other Race Population: This column displays the rank of states in the United States by their Non-Hispanic Some Other Race (SOR) population, using the most recent ACS data available.
• states: The states for which the rank is shown in the previous column.
• Non-Hispanic Other Race Population: The Non-Hispanic Other Race population of the states is shown in this column.
• % of Total states Population: This shows what percentage of the total states population identifies as Non-Hispanic Other Race. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.
• % of Total U.S. Non-Hispanic Other Race Population: This tells us how much of the entire United States Non-Hispanic Other Race population lives in that states. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.
• 5 Year Rank Trend: TThis column displays the rank trend across the last 5 years.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

This Zenodo entry details the methodology for extracting and reconciling ethnicity data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), incorporating both General Practitioner (GP) and Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) sources. The approach aims to resolve discrepancies between these sources and provide a standardized single ethnicity value per patient, categorized into 6 and 12 levels according to NHS coding guidelines.

Materials and Methods:

Ethnicity data from the CPRD are recorded in multiple formats. This study harmonizes these data to achieve consistent ethnicity classification across patient records, following a hierarchal reconciliation protocol prioritizing hospital data over GP records.

Ethnicity Levels: Ethnicity data are processed to conform to two levels of granularity:

1. Six high-level categories: White, Black, Asian, Mixed, Other, Unknown
2. Twelve detailed categories: Bangladeshi, Black African, Black Caribbean, Black Other, Chinese, Indian, Mixed, Other Asian, Other, Pakistani, Unknown, White

Source Data Mapping:

• CPRD Medcodes: Directly mapped to 490 SNOMED codes
• SNOMED to NHS Codes: SNOMED codes are linked to 26 NHS ethnicity codes
• NHS to HES Codes: These NHS codes further map into 12 HES hospital ethnicities, which then consolidate into the 6 broad categories mentioned above

Algorithm (AIM-CISC):

• Hospital Data Priority: Ethnicity records from hospital sources override those from GP records unless the hospital data is classified as "Unknown", null, or empty.
• Conflict Resolution Within GP Data:
  • The frequency of recorded ethnicities determines the selection. The most frequently recorded ethnicity prevails.
  • If frequencies are tied, the most recent record is used.
  • In cases where records are equally recent, the first alphabetically listed ethnicity is selected.

Unique Patient Identifiers: Each patient is represented once in hospital data, ensuring a single source of truth for hospital-based ethnicities. This simplifies reconciliation with GP data when discrepancies arise.

Source Documentation and References:

• Reference for Code Lists: Digital ethnicity data in population-wide electronic health records in England: a description of completeness, coverage, and granularity of diversity (Pineda-Moncusí et al., 2022): https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.11.22282217
• GitHub Repository for Code Lists: https://github.com/BHFDSC/CCU037_01/blob/main/england/phenotypes/snomed_meaning_and_map_to_primary_code.csv
• NHS Ethnicity Codes Documentation: https://www.datadictionary.nhs.uk/attributes/ethnic_category_code_2001.html open_in_new

Notes on mapping:

Instances were noted where multiple Medcodes map back to a single SNOMED code, highlighting the importance of careful data cross-referencing. For example, two different Medcodes represent the New Zealand European ethnicity, which both map back to the identical SNOMED code.

This dataset contains data files for a research paper, "Ethnicity-Based Name Partitioning for Author Name Disambiguation Using Supervised Machine Learning," published in the Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.Four zipped files are uploaded.Each zipped file contains five data files: signatures_train.txt, signatures_test.txt, records.txt, clusters_train.txt, and clusters_test.txt.1. 'Signatures' files contain lists of name instances. Each name instance (a row) is associated with information as follows. - 1st column: instance id (numeric): unique id assigned to a name instance - 2nd column: paper id (numeric): unique id assigned to a paper in which the name instance appears as an author name - 3rd column: byline position (numeric): integer indicating the position of the name instance in the authorship byline of the paper - 4th column: author name (string): name string formatted as surname, comma, and forename(s) - 5th column: ethnic name group (string): name ethnicity assigned by Ethnea to the name instance - 6th column: affiliation (string): affiliation associated with the name instance, if available in the original data - 7th column: block (string): simplified name string of the name instance to indicate its block membership (surname and first forename initial) - 8th column: author id (string): unique author id (i.e., author label) assigned by the creators of the original data2. 'Records' files contain lists of papers. Each paper is associated with information as follows. -1st column: paper id (numeric): unique paper id; this is the unique paper id (2nd column) in Signatures files -2nd column: year (numeric): year of publication * Some papers may have wrong publication years due to incorrect indexing or delayed updates in original data -3rd column: venue (string): name of journal or conference in which the paper is published * Venue names can be in full string or in a shortened format according to the formats in original data -4th column: authors (string; separated by vertical bar): list of author names that appear in the paper's byline * Author names are formatted into surname, comma, and forename(s) -5th column: title words (string; separated by space): words in a title of the paper. * Note that common words are stop-listed and each remaining word is stemmed using Porter's stemmer.3. 'Clusters' files contain lists of clusters. Each cluster is associated with information as follows. -1st column: cluster id (numeric): unique id of a cluster -2nd column: list of name instance ids (Signatures - 1st column) that belong to the same unique author id (Signatures - 8th column). Signatures and Clusters files consist of two subsets - train and test files - of original labeled data which are randomly split into 50%-50% by the authors of this study.Original labeled data for AMiner.zip, KISTI.zip, and GESIS.zip came from the studies cited below.If you use one of the uploaded data files, please cite them accordingly.[AMiner.zip]Tang, J., Fong, A. C. M., Wang, B., & Zhang, J. (2012). A Unified Probabilistic Framework for Name Disambiguation in Digital Library. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 24(6), 975-987. doi:10.1109/Tkde.2011.13Wang, X., Tang, J., Cheng, H., & Yu, P. S. (2011). ADANA: Active Name Disambiguation. Paper presented at the 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining.[KISTI.zip]Kang, I. S., Kim, P., Lee, S., Jung, H., & You, B. J. (2011). Construction of a Large-Scale Test Set for Author Disambiguation. Information Processing & Management, 47(3), 452-465. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2010.10.001Note that the original KISTI data contain errors and duplicates. This study reuses the revised version of KISTI reported in a study below.Kim, J. (2018). Evaluating author name disambiguation for digital libraries: A case of DBLP. Scientometrics, 116(3), 1867-1886. doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2824-5[GESIS.zip]Momeni, F., & Mayr, P. (2016). Evaluating Co-authorship Networks in Author Name Disambiguation for Common Names. Paper presented at the 20th international Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (TPDL 2016), Hannover, Germany.Note that this study reuses the 'Evaluation Set' among the original GESIS data which was added titles by a study below.Kim, J., & Kim, J. (2020). Effect of forename string on author name disambiguation. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71(7), 839-855. doi:10.1002/asi.24298[UM-IRIS.zip]This labeled dataset was created for this study. For description about the labeling method, please see 'Method' in the paper below.Kim, J., Kim, J., & Owen-Smith, J. (In print). Ethnicity-based name partitioning for author name disambiguation using supervised machine learning. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. doi:10.1002/asi.24459.For details on the labeling method and limitations, see the paper below.Kim, J., & Owen-Smith, J. (2021). ORCID-linked labeled data for evaluating author name disambiguation at scale. Scientometrics. doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03826-6

The Bureau of the Census has released Census 2000 Summary File 1 (SF1) 100-Percent data. The file includes the following population items: sex, age, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, household relationship, and household and family characteristics. Housing items include occupancy status and tenure (whether the unit is owner or renter occupied). SF1 does not include information on incomes, poverty status, overcrowded housing or age of housing. These topics will be covered in Summary File 3. Data are available for states, counties, county subdivisions, places, census tracts, block groups, and, where applicable, American Indian and Alaskan Native Areas and Hawaiian Home Lands. The SF1 data are available on the Bureau's web site and may be retrieved from American FactFinder as tables, lists, or maps. Users may also download a set of compressed ASCII files for each state via the Bureau's FTP server. There are over 8000 data items available for each geographic area. The full listing of these data items is available here as a downloadable compressed data base file named TABLES.ZIP. The uncompressed is in FoxPro data base file (dbf) format and may be imported to ACCESS, EXCEL, and other software formats. While all of this information is useful, the Office of Community Planning and Development has downloaded selected information for all states and areas and is making this information available on the CPD web pages. The tables and data items selected are those items used in the CDBG and HOME allocation formulas plus topics most pertinent to the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS), the Consolidated Plan, and similar overall economic and community development plans. The information is contained in five compressed (zipped) dbf tables for each state. When uncompressed the tables are ready for use with FoxPro and they can be imported into ACCESS, EXCEL, and other spreadsheet, GIS and database software. The data are at the block group summary level. The first two characters of the file name are the state abbreviation. The next two letters are BG for block group. Each record is labeled with the code and name of the city and county in which it is located so that the data can be summarized to higher-level geography. The last part of the file name describes the contents . The GEO file contains standard Census Bureau geographic identifiers for each block group, such as the metropolitan area code and congressional district code. The only data included in this table is total population and total housing units. POP1 and POP2 contain selected population variables and selected housing items are in the HU file. The MA05 table data is only for use by State CDBG grantees for the reporting of the racial composition of beneficiaries of Area Benefit activities. The complete package for a state consists of the dictionary file named TABLES, and the five data files for the state. The logical record number (LOGRECNO) links the records across tables.

About this dataset

Context

This list ranks the 77 counties in the Oklahoma by Multi-Racial Some Other Race (SOR) population, as estimated by the United States Census Bureau. It also highlights population changes in each counties over the past five years.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates, including:

• 2019-2023 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2018-2022 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2017-2021 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2016-2020 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2015-2019 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Variables / Data Columns

• Rank by Multi-Racial Other Race Population: This column displays the rank of counties in the Oklahoma by their Multi-Racial Some Other Race (SOR) population, using the most recent ACS data available.
• counties: The counties for which the rank is shown in the previous column.
• Multi-Racial Other Race Population: The Multi-Racial Other Race population of the counties is shown in this column.
• % of Total counties Population: This shows what percentage of the total counties population identifies as Multi-Racial Other Race. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.
• % of Total Oklahoma Multi-Racial Other Race Population: This tells us how much of the entire Oklahoma Multi-Racial Other Race population lives in that counties. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.
• 5 Year Rank Trend: TThis column displays the rank trend across the last 5 years.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

The Census Bureau has created a special subset file from the 1990 Census of Population and Housing data designed to meet the needs of Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) and affirmative action planning. It contains detailed 1990 Census data dealing with occupation and educational attainment for the civilian labor force, various racial groups, and the Hispanic population. The file consists of four tabulations of the United States civilian labor force. They present EEO data similar to those in the CENSUS OF POPULATION AND HOUSING, 1990 [UNITED STATES]: EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY (EEO) FILE (ICPSR 9929), but are expanded to include occupation data by education level, industry group, and earnings. Total population and unemployment data are also available. They are referred to as Tables P1-P4. Table P1 lists occupation by education by sex by race and Hispanic origin. Table P2 lists occupation by earnings by sex by race and Hispanic origin. Table P3 lists occupation by industry by sex by race and Hispanic origin. Table P4 lists population and unemployment by sex by race and Hispanic origin. The collection includes four United States files and 51 separate files, one for each state and Washington, DC. Each state file contains statistics for the state, each county, Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas (SMSAs), and places with a population of 50,000 or more.

Summary File 1 contains 100-percent United States decennial Census data, which is the information compiled from the questions asked of all people and about every housing unit. The Final National component of Summary File 1 describes the entire United States. Population items include sex, age, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, household relationship, group quarters occupancy, and urban area data. Housing items include occupancy status, vacancy status, and tenure (owner-occupied or renter-occupied). There are a total of 171 population tables ("P") and 56 housing tables ("H") provided down to the block level, and 59 population tables provided down to the census tract level ("PCT") for a total of 286 tables. In addition, 14 population tables and 4 housing tables at the block level and 4 population tables at the census tract level are repeated by major race and Hispanic or Latino groups. The data present population and housing characteristics for the total population, population totals for an extensive list of race (American Indian and Alaska Native tribes, Asian, Native Hawaiian, and Other Pacific Islander) and Hispanic or Latino groups, and population and housing characteristics for a limited list of race and Hispanic or Latino groups. Population and housing items may be crosstabulated. Selected aggregates and medians also are provided.

This article uses a recent first name list to develop an improvement to an existing Bayesian classifier, namely the Bayesian Improved Surname Geocoding (BISG) method, which combines surname and geography information to impute missing race/ethnicity. The new Bayesian Improved First Name Surname Geocoding (BIFSG) method is validated using a large sample of mortgage applicants who self-report their race/ethnicity. BIFSG outperforms BISG, in terms of accuracy and coverage, for all major racial/ethnic categories. Although the overall magnitude of improvement is somewhat small, the largest improvements occur for non-Hispanic Blacks, a group for which the BISG performance is weakest. When estimating the race/ethnicity effects on mortgage pricing and underwriting decisions with regression models, estimation biases from both BIFSG and BISG are very small, with BIFSG generally having smaller biases, and the maximum a posteriori classifier resulting in smaller biases than through use of estimated probabilities. Robustness checks using voter registration data confirm BIFSG's improved performance vis-a-vis BISG and illustrate BIFSG's applicability to areas other than mortgage lending. Finally, I demonstrate an application of the BIFSG to the imputation of missing race/ethnicity in the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act data, and in the process, offer novel evidence that the incidence of missing race/ethnicity information is correlated with race/ethnicity.

BackgroundAddressing contemporary anti-Asian racism and its impacts on health requires understanding its historical roots, including discriminatory restrictions on immigration, citizenship, and land ownership. Archival secondary data such as historical census records provide opportunities to quantitatively analyze structural dynamics that affect the health of Asian immigrants and Asian Americans. Census data overcome weaknesses of other data sources, such as small sample size and aggregation of Asian subgroups. This article explores the strengths and limitations of early twentieth-century census data for understanding Asian Americans and structural racism.MethodsWe used California census data from three decennial census spanning 1920–1940 to compare two criteria for identifying Asian Americans: census racial categories and Asian surname lists (Chinese, Indian, Japanese, Korean, and Filipino) that have been validated in contemporary population data. This paper examines the sensitivity and specificity of surname classification compared to census-designated “color or race” at the population level.ResultsSurname criteria were found to be highly specific, with each of the five surname lists having a specificity of over 99% for all three census years. The Chinese surname list had the highest sensitivity (ranging from 0.60–0.67 across census years), followed by the Indian (0.54–0.61) and Japanese (0.51–0.62) surname lists. Sensitivity was much lower for Korean (0.40–0.45) and Filipino (0.10–0.21) surnames. With the exception of Indian surnames, the sensitivity values of surname criteria were lower for the 1920–1940 census data than those reported for the 1990 census. The extent of the difference in sensitivity and trends across census years vary by subgroup.DiscussionSurname criteria may have lower sensitivity in detecting Asian subgroups in historical data as opposed to contemporary data as enumeration procedures for Asians have changed across time. We examine how the conflation of race, ethnicity, and nationality in the census could contribute to low sensitivity of surname classification compared to census-designated “color or race.” These results can guide decisions when operationalizing race in the context of specific research questions, thus promoting historical quantitative study of Asian American experiences. Furthermore, these results stress the need to situate measures of race and racism in their specific historical context.

Table published by the Connecticut Department of Public Health that contains reportable disease data. Each row of data represents a case of disease in a person with their reported race/ethnicity.

Information on race/ethnicity is gathered from individuals during case interviews. Reported race and ethnicity information is used create a single race/ethnicity variable. People with more than one race are classified as two or more races. People with Hispanic ethnicity are classified as Hispanic regardless of reported race(s). People with a missing ethnicity are classified as non-Hispanic.

All data are preliminary; data for previous weeks are routinely updated as new reports are received, duplicate records are removed, and data errors are corrected.

The following disease(s) are included in this table:

MPOX (previously called Monkeypox), Influenza

The EEO Tabulation is sponsored by four Federal agencies consisting of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the Employment Litigation Section of the Civil Rights Division at the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP), and the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), and developed in conjunction with the U.S. Census Bureau..Supporting documentation on code lists and subject definitions can be found on the Equal Employment Opportunity Tabulation website. https://www.census.gov/topics/employment/equal-employment-opportunity-tabulation.html.Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2014-2018 American Community Survey.Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted roughly as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/technical-documentation.html The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables)..The U.S. Census Bureau collects race data in accordance with guidelines provided by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Except for the total, all race and ethnicity categories are mutually exclusive. "Black" refers to Black or African American; "AIAN" refers to American Indian and Alaska Native; and "NHPI" refers to Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander. "Balance of Not Hispanic or Latino" includes the balance of non-Hispanic individuals who reported multiple races or reported Some Other Race alone. For more information on race and Hispanic origin, see the Subject Definitions at https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/technical-documentation.html..Race and Hispanic origin are separate concepts on the American Community Survey. "White alone Hispanic or Latino" includes respondents who reported Hispanic or Latino origin and reported race as "White" and no other race. "All other Hispanic or Latino" includes respondents who reported Hispanic or Latino origin and reported a race other than "White," either alone or in combination..Occupation titles and their 4-digit codes are based on the 2018 Standard Occupational Classification..The 2014-2018 American Community Survey (ACS) data generally reflect the September 2018 Office of Management and Budget (OMB) delineations of metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas. In certain instances the names, codes, and boundaries of the principal cities shown in ACS tables may differ from the OMB delineations due to differences in the effective dates of the geographic entities..Explanation of Symbols:An "-" entry in the estimate column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution, or the margin of error associated with a median was larger than the median itself.An "(X)" means that the estimate is not applicable or not available.An "**" entry in the margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate.An "***" entry in the margin of error column indicates that the median falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate.An "*****" entry in the margin of error column indicates that the estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate.An "N" entry in the estimate and margin of error columns indicates that data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.An "-" following a median estimate means the median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution.An "+" following a median estimate means the median falls in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution.

About this dataset

Context

This list ranks the 14 counties in the Vermont by Some Other Race (SOR) population, as estimated by the United States Census Bureau. It also highlights population changes in each counties over the past five years.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates, including:

• 2019-2023 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2018-2022 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2017-2021 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2016-2020 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2015-2019 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Variables / Data Columns

• Rank by Other Race Population: This column displays the rank of counties in the Vermont by their Some Other Race (SOR) population, using the most recent ACS data available.
• counties: The counties for which the rank is shown in the previous column.
• Other Race Population: The Other Race population of the counties is shown in this column.
• % of Total counties Population: This shows what percentage of the total counties population identifies as Other Race. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.
• % of Total Vermont Other Race Population: This tells us how much of the entire Vermont Other Race population lives in that counties. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.
• 5 Year Rank Trend: TThis column displays the rank trend across the last 5 years.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

The housing register shows the waiting list for social housing broken down by ethnicity and year. To join a housing register you must have a housing need. This means that your current accommodation is not suitable for you or a family member of your household.The data shows how many joined the register each year via submission of an application. It does not portray those who are no longer active on the register.Small number suppression has been applied to those detailed ethnicities which are less than 10. All those individuals will be listed as a group called Data disclosure protection.

Replication Data for ``Nomination and List Placement of Ethnic Minorities under Open-list Proportional Rules: The Centrality of Ethnopolitical Context'' forthcoming in Electoral Studies.

The list includes 4,250 first names and information on their respective count and proportions across six mutually exclusive racial and Hispanic origin groups. These six categories are consistent with the categories used in the Census Bureau's surname list.

Rates of HIV diagnosis among males ages 13 and older by race/ethnicity, 2016, Santa Clara County. Source: Santa Clara County Public Health Department, enhanced HIV/AIDS reporting system (eHARS), data as of 4/30/2017.METADATA:Notes (String): Lists table title, notes and sourcesCategory (String): Lists the category representing the data: Santa Clara County is for total population; race/ethnicity:Asian/Pacific Islander, Black/African American, Latino and White (non-Hispanic White only).Rate per 100,000 males ages 13 and older (Numeric): Number of HIV diagnosis per 100,000 males ages 13 and older in a particular category

About this dataset

Context

This list ranks the 3065 counties in the United States by Some Other Race (SOR) population, as estimated by the United States Census Bureau. It also highlights population changes in each counties over the past five years.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates, including:

• 2019-2023 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2018-2022 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2017-2021 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2016-2020 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2015-2019 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Variables / Data Columns

• Rank by Other Race Population: This column displays the rank of counties in the United States by their Some Other Race (SOR) population, using the most recent ACS data available.
• counties: The counties for which the rank is shown in the previous column.
• Other Race Population: The Other Race population of the counties is shown in this column.
• % of Total counties Population: This shows what percentage of the total counties population identifies as Other Race. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.
• % of Total U.S. Other Race Population: This tells us how much of the entire United States Other Race population lives in that counties. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.
• 5 Year Rank Trend: TThis column displays the rank trend across the last 5 years.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Bullied because of race, ethnicity, or national origin on school property in the past 12 months by sex, race/ethnicity, and grade, California Healthy Kids Survey, 2015-16METADATA:Notes (String): Lists table title, sourceYear (String): Year of surveyCategory (String): Lists the category representing the data: Santa Clara County is for total surveyed population, sex: Male and Female, race/ethnicity: African American, Asian/Pacific Islander, Latino and White (non-Hispanic White only) and grade level (7th, 9th, 11th, or non-traditional).Percent (Numeric): Percentage of middle and high school students who were bullied because of race, ethnicity, or national origin on school property in the past 12 months