Lynching in the United States is estimated to have claimed over 4.7 thousand lives between 1882 and 1968, and just under 3.5 thousand of these victims were black. Today, lynching is more commonly associated with racial oppression, particularly in the south, however, in early years, victims were more commonly white (specifically Mexican), and lynchings were more frequent in western territories and along the southern border. It was only after Reconstruction's end where the lynching of black people became more prevalent, and was arguably the most violent tool of oppression used by white supremacists. Nationwide, the share of the population who was black fluctuated between 10 and 13 percent in the years shown here, however the share of lynching victims who were black was almost 73 percent. North-south divide Of the 4.7 thousand victims of lynching between 1882 and 1968, over 3.5 thousand of these were killed in former-Confederate states. Of the fourteen states where the highest number of lynching victims were killed, eleven were former-Confederate states, and all saw the deaths of at least one hundred people due to lynching. Mississippi was the state where most people were lynched in these years, with an estimated 581 victims, 93 percent of whom were black. Georgia saw the second most lynchings, with 531 in total, and the share of black victims was also 93 percent. Compared to the nationwide average of 73 percent, the share of black victims in former-Confederate states was 86 percent. Texas was the only former-Confederate state where this share (71 percent) was below the national average, due to the large number of Mexicans who were lynched there. Outside of the south Of the non-Confederate state with the highest number of lynching victims, most either bordered the former-Confederate states, or were to the west. Generally speaking, the share of white victims in these states was often higher than in the south, meaning that the majority took place in the earlier years represented here; something often attributed to the lack of an established judiciary system in rural regions, and the demand for a speedy resolution. However, there are many reports of black people being lynched in the former border states in the early-20th century, as they made their way northward during the Great Migration. Between 1882 and 1968, lynchings were rare in the Northeast, although Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Rhode Island were the only states** without any recorded lynchings in these years.

BackgroundNeuropsychiatric symptoms (NPSs) lead to myriad poor health outcomes among individuals with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Prior studies have observed associations between the various aspects of the home environment and NPSs, but macro-level environmental stressors (e.g., neighborhood income) may also disrupt the neuronal microenvironment and exacerbate NPSs. Yet, to our knowledge, no studies have investigated the relationship between the neighborhood environment and NPSs.MethodsUsing 2010 data among older adults with AD collected from a sample of the South Carolina Alzheimer’s Disease Registry, we estimated cross-sectional associations between neighborhood characteristics and NPSs in the overall population and by race/ethnicity. Neighborhood measures (within a 1/2-mile radius of residence) came from the American Community Survey and Rural Urban Commuting Area Code. We categorized median household income into tertiles: < $30,500, $30,500–40,000, and > $40,000, and rurality as: rural, small urban, and large urban. Residential instability was defined as the percent of residents who moved within the past year. NPSs were defined using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire that included the composite measure of all 12 domains. Adjusting for age, sex/gender, race/ethnicity, and caregiver educational attainment, we used negative binomial regression to estimate prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for NPSs by neighborhood characteristics.ResultsAmong 212 eligible participants, mean age was 82 ± 8.7 years, 72% were women, and 55% non-Hispanic (NH)-Black. Individuals with AD living in < $30,500 vs. > $40,000 income neighborhoods had a 53% (PR = 1.53; 95% CI = 1.06–2.23) higher prevalence of NPSs while individuals living in rural vs. large urban neighborhoods had a 36% lower prevalence of NPSs (PR = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.45–0.90), after adjustment. We did not observe an association between residential instability and NPSs (PR = 0.92; 95% CI = 0.86–1.00); however, our estimates suggested differences by race/ethnicity where NH-White older adults living in residential instable areas had lower NPSs (PR = 0.89; 95% CI = 0.82–0.96) compared to NH-Black older adults (PR = 0.96; 95% CI = 0.86–1.07).DiscussionAcross racial/ethnic groups, individuals with AD had more symptomology when living in lower income areas. Pending replication, intervention efforts should consider resource allocation to high-need neighborhoods (e.g., lower income), and studies should investigate underlying mechanisms for this relationship.