Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Euro Area recorded a capital and financial account surplus of 44.24 EUR Billion in May of 2025. This dataset provides - Euro Area Capital Flows - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset provides values for CAPITAL FLOWS. reported in several countries. The data includes current values, previous releases, historical highs and record lows, release frequency, reported unit and currency.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Turkey (FDI) Foreign Direct Investment: Capital Inflows: European Union Countries (EU) data was reported at 4.852 USD bn in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 3.783 USD bn for 2016. Turkey (FDI) Foreign Direct Investment: Capital Inflows: European Union Countries (EU) data is updated yearly, averaging 5.168 USD bn from Dec 2002 (Median) to 2017, with 16 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 14.489 USD bn in 2006 and a record low of 454.000 USD mn in 2002. Turkey (FDI) Foreign Direct Investment: Capital Inflows: European Union Countries (EU) data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Economy. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Turkey – Table TR.O004: Foreign Direct Investment: Flow: by Country: Annual.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Indonesia (FDI) Foreign Direct Investment: BPM6: Other Capital Flows: EU: Austria data was reported at -5.030 USD mn in Jun 2019. This records a decrease from the previous number of 30.540 USD mn for Mar 2019. Indonesia (FDI) Foreign Direct Investment: BPM6: Other Capital Flows: EU: Austria data is updated quarterly, averaging -0.520 USD mn from Mar 2011 (Median) to Jun 2019, with 25 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 34.120 USD mn in Sep 2013 and a record low of -30.470 USD mn in Jun 2018. Indonesia (FDI) Foreign Direct Investment: BPM6: Other Capital Flows: EU: Austria data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Bank of Indonesia. The data is categorized under Indonesia Premium Database’s Investment – Table ID.OA003: Foreign Direct Investment: Other Capital.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The United States recorded a capital and financial account surplus of 311100 USD Million in May of 2025. This dataset provides the latest reported value for - United States Net Treasury International Capital Flows - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Indonesia (FDI) Foreign Direct Investment: BPM6: Other Capital Flows: EU: Netherlands data was reported at -81.140 USD mn in Jun 2019. This records an increase from the previous number of -205.710 USD mn for Mar 2019. Indonesia (FDI) Foreign Direct Investment: BPM6: Other Capital Flows: EU: Netherlands data is updated quarterly, averaging 37.480 USD mn from Mar 2010 (Median) to Jun 2019, with 38 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1.153 USD bn in Sep 2017 and a record low of -946.080 USD mn in Jun 2016. Indonesia (FDI) Foreign Direct Investment: BPM6: Other Capital Flows: EU: Netherlands data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Bank of Indonesia. The data is categorized under Indonesia Premium Database’s Investment – Table ID.OA003: Foreign Direct Investment: Other Capital.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Data provided includes results from "Heterogeneous responses of capital flows to macroprudential policies: Evidence from Central, Eastern, and Southeastern Europe". Contains posterior draws of vector autoregressive and variance parameters, as well as computed impulse responses.
Accompanying code can be found on Github.
This statistic shows a distribution of biotechnology companies' capital flow in Europe from 2008 to 2020. In 2020, European biotech companies were able to acquire venture capital amounting to roughly *** billion euros.
EU financial market participants are required to comply with the EU Taxonomy Regulation (EUT). It is part of the EU Action Plan on Sustainable Finance which aims to reorient capital flows towards sustainable investments, manage financial risks from climate change, environmental degradation and social issues, and foster transparency. The EUT data on investee companies supports your regulatory compliance with regards to equity and bond investments. SIX sources this data from several ESG data providers that are well known in the market.
The Capital account covers all transactions that involve the receipt or payment of the capital account. It covers the Acquisitions/disposals of non-produced non-financial assets and capital transfers. The capital account together with the current and the financial accounts forms the Balance of Payments (BoP). It is either expressed as % of GDP or million of national currency. The financial flows are marked as a credit, a debit or a balance. The indicator is based on the Balance of Payments (BoP) data reported to Eurostat by the 28 EU Member States. Definitions are based on the IMF's Sixth Balance of Payments Manual (BPM6).
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Indonesia (FDI) Foreign Direct Investment: BPM6: Other Capital Flows: EU: Germany data was reported at -31.140 USD mn in Jun 2019. This records a decrease from the previous number of -4.420 USD mn for Mar 2019. Indonesia (FDI) Foreign Direct Investment: BPM6: Other Capital Flows: EU: Germany data is updated quarterly, averaging 6.500 USD mn from Mar 2010 (Median) to Jun 2019, with 38 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 102.260 USD mn in Mar 2014 and a record low of -97.730 USD mn in Dec 2015. Indonesia (FDI) Foreign Direct Investment: BPM6: Other Capital Flows: EU: Germany data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Bank of Indonesia. The data is categorized under Indonesia Premium Database’s Investment – Table ID.OA003: Foreign Direct Investment: Other Capital.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Overview of other financial movements with foreign countries. The figures are available on a quarterly basis from 2003K4.
Einstellung von Managern zu den Veränderungen der wirtschaftlichen Rahmenbedingungen. Themen: Verantwortungsbereich des Befragten; Unternehmensgröße; Branche; Anzahl der Handelspartnerländer innerhalb der Länder der Europäischen Union; Prozentanteil des Umsatzes, der in diesen EU-Ländern erwirtschaftet wurde; Einfluss von Maßnahmen der EU zur Schaffung eines einheitlichen europäischen Binnenmarkts auf die eigene Firma hinsichtlich Produktstandards, Auszeichnungs- und Verpackungsstandards, Auftragsvergabeverfahren, Abschaffung von Zollpapieren sowie Grenzkontrollen, Umsatzsteuer, Liberalisierung von Kapitalströmen, Regelungen für die Ansiedlung eines Unternehmens in EU-Ländern; Einschätzung des Einflusses des europäischen Binnenmarkts auf die Firmenstrategien hinsichtlich: Preisgestaltung, An- und Verkäufen sowie Lieferung aus anderen EU-Ländern bzw. an andere EU-Länder, Dienstleistungen in EU-Ländern, Investitionen in andere EU-Ländern, Investitionen aus EU-Ländern in die eigene Firma, Kooperation mit Unternehmen aus EU-Ländern, Marketing-Strategien; Anstieg der Konkurrenz durch inländische bzw. ausländische Unternehmen; Anstellung von Mitarbeitern aus Mitgliedsstaaten; wichtigste Gründe für eine Nichtanstellung; Einschätzung des Einflusses der EU-Erweiterung 2004 auf: den Preis von Rohstoffen, die Höhe der Löhne, den Zugang zu neuen Märkten, Verkaufspreise, Produktivität, Wirtschaftlichkeit, Beschäftigungswachstum; Handelskontakte mit alten EU-Mitgliedern; Wichtigkeit von zukünftigen Binnenmarkt-Aktivitäten für die eigene Firma: Entfernen formaler Hindernisse beim Handel von Gütern und Dienstleistungen, Patentanmeldungen, stärkerer Schutz geistigen Eigentums, weitere Öffnung des Beschaffungsmarktes, Umsetzung eines integrierten europäischen Finanzmarktes, Sicherstellung von fairem Wettbewerb innerhalb des europäischen Binnenmarktes, verstärkter Wettbewerb bei Versorgungsdienstleistungen wie Telekommunikations-, Transport- und Postdienstleistungen sowie Energieversorgung, Vereinheitlichung von Vorschriften bei Geschäftstätigkeiten innerhalb des Binnenmarktes, Vereinfachung von Arbeitsmobilität; Hauptgründe der Firma nicht in andere EU-Länder zu exportieren. Managers’ attitude towards the changes of the general economic conditions. Topics: Area of responsibility of the interviewees; company size: branch; number of business partner countries within the European Union: percentage of the turnover generated in those EU countries; influence of measures taken by the EU to create a uniform European domestic market on one’s own company in terms of product standards, packaging standards, order placement procedure, elimination of customs documents as well as custom controls, value-added tax, liberalisation of capital flows, regulations for the settlement of a company in the European Union; assessment of the influence of the European domestic market of one’s own company in terms of company strategies regarding: pricing, purchases and sales as well as deliveries from all as well as to all EU countries, services in EU countries, investments from other EU countries in one’s own company, cooperation with companies from EU countries, marketing strategies; increase in competition through domestic and foreign companies; employment of employees from member states; most important reason for not employing somebody; assessment of the influence of the EU expansion in 2004 on: the price of raw goods, pay-rate, access to new markets, retail prices, productivity, increase in employment; business contact with old EU members; importance of the future domestic market activities for one’s own company: removal of formal obstacles in trading goods and services, patent applications, stronger protection of intellectual property, further opening of the supply market, application of an integrated European financial market, safeguarding of fair competition in supply services such as telecommunications, transport and postal as well as energy supply, standardisation of regulations for business activities within the domestic market, simplification of work mobility; main reasons for the company not exporting to other EU countries.
https://www.gesis.org/en/institute/data-usage-termshttps://www.gesis.org/en/institute/data-usage-terms
Managers’ attitude towards the changes of the general economic conditions.
Topics: Area of responsibility of the interviewees; company size: branch; number of business partner countries within the European Union: percentage of the turnover generated in those EU countries; influence of measures taken by the EU to create a uniform European domestic market on one’s own company in terms of product standards, packaging standards, order placement procedure, elimination of customs documents as well as custom controls, value-added tax, liberalisation of capital flows, regulations for the settlement of a company in the European Union; assessment of the influence of the European domestic market of one’s own company in terms of company strategies regarding: pricing, purchases and sales as well as deliveries from all as well as to all EU countries, services in EU countries, investments from other EU countries in one’s own company, cooperation with companies from EU countries, marketing strategies; increase in competition through domestic and foreign companies; employment of employees from member states; most important reason for not employing somebody; assessment of the influence of the EU expansion in 2004 on: the price of raw goods, pay-rate, access to new markets, retail prices, productivity, increase in employment; business contact with old EU members; importance of the future domestic market activities for one’s own company: removal of formal obstacles in trading goods and services, patent applications, stronger protection of intellectual property, further opening of the supply market, application of an integrated European financial market, safeguarding of fair competition in supply services such as telecommunications, transport and postal as well as energy supply, standardisation of regulations for business activities within the domestic market, simplification of work mobility; main reasons for the company not exporting to other EU countries.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Indonesia (FDI) Foreign Direct Investment: BPM6: Other Capital Flows: EU: Finland data was reported at -0.190 USD mn in Jun 2019. This records an increase from the previous number of -179.020 USD mn for Mar 2019. Indonesia (FDI) Foreign Direct Investment: BPM6: Other Capital Flows: EU: Finland data is updated quarterly, averaging 0.010 USD mn from Jun 2012 (Median) to Jun 2019, with 27 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 85.940 USD mn in Jun 2017 and a record low of -179.020 USD mn in Mar 2019. Indonesia (FDI) Foreign Direct Investment: BPM6: Other Capital Flows: EU: Finland data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Bank of Indonesia. The data is categorized under Indonesia Premium Database’s Investment – Table ID.OA003: Foreign Direct Investment: Other Capital.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Under the Paris Agreement, the world’s governments, including European governments and the European Union (EU), are committed to a low-carbon transition, with a goal of net zero emissions in the second half of this century, while ‘making finance flows consistent’ with that pathway. In addition, the EU has called upon Member States to phase out their support to fossil fuels by 2020. Progress towards this goal, however, has been slow. Our research finds that 11 countries (accounting for 83% of the EU’s emissions) and the EU’s budget and public banks still provide at least €21 billion per year of support for the production of coal, oil, and gas (with €2.6 billion of this amount allocated to the transition away from coal). This is via three distinct financial flows: fiscal support via budgetary transfers and tax breaks; public lending to the sector; and capital investment by fossil fuel-related state-owned enterprises. The financing captured by this figure is a minimum estimate due to lack of transparency in the data provided by governments. We argue that it is vital for European governments to fulfil their promises to phase out subsidies and other financial flows to fossil fuels to meet their climate goals. This must start with greater transparency around the support being provided and phase-out plans, including annual reporting on support for production and consumption of fossil fuels, in line with the EU’s recently strengthened Energy Union Governance framework for 2030. This entails the inclusion of national policies, timelines, and measures aimed at phasing out financial support to fossil fuels in Member States’ National Energy and Climate Plans (NECPs). Key Policy insights:Between 2014 and 2016, 11 European countries and the EU public banks and budget provided at least €21 billion per year of support for the production of coal, oil, and gas.Meeting commitments to phase out subsidies towards the production of fossil fuels is critical for meeting climate goals.EU Member States insufficiently reported on their fossil fuel subsidies in their draft NECPs.Greater transparency and reporting on all fossil fuel financing is a key first step towards phase-out. Between 2014 and 2016, 11 European countries and the EU public banks and budget provided at least €21 billion per year of support for the production of coal, oil, and gas. Meeting commitments to phase out subsidies towards the production of fossil fuels is critical for meeting climate goals. EU Member States insufficiently reported on their fossil fuel subsidies in their draft NECPs. Greater transparency and reporting on all fossil fuel financing is a key first step towards phase-out.
EU financial market participants are required to comply with the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR). It is part of the EU Action Plan on Sustainable Finance which aims to reorient capital flows towards sustainable investments, manage financial risks from climate change, environmental degradation and social issues, and foster transparency. The SFDR data on investee companies supports your regulatory compliance with regards to equity and bond investments. SIX sources this data from several ESG data providers that are well known in the market.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The Current account provides information about the transactions of a country with the rest of the world. It covers all transactions (other than those in financial items) in goods, services, primary income and secondary income which occur between resident and non-resident units. It is either expressed as % of GDP or in million of national currency. The financial flows are marked as a credit, a debit or a balance. The current account together with the capital and the financial accounts forms the Balance of Payments (BoP). The indicator is used in the calculation of the MIP Scoreboard indicator, and it is based on the BoP data reported to Eurostat by the EU Member States. Starting from October 2014 definitions are based on the IMF's Sixth Balance of Payments Manual (BPM6). Copyright notice and free re-use of data on: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/about-us/policies/copyright
Gross domestic product (GDP) per capita is a measure of economic production, which takes the entire output of a national economy during a year and divides it by the population of that country. In the European Union, Luxembourg, Ireland, Denmark, the Netherlands, and Austria come out on top as the countries which produced the most per capita in 2024. Europe's richest countries benefit from multinational companies Many criticisms have been made of using GDP per capita as away to judge a country's economic wealth in recent years, as global capital flows have come to distort the statistics and to give a warped impression of different countries' wealth. This is most notably the case for Ireland and for Luxembourg, which while certainly high-income countries, have experienced dramatic booms in their GDP over the past two decades due to the accounting practices of the large multinational corporations which have their European headquarters in these member states, such as Facebook and Apple in Dublin, and Amazon in Luxembourg. Will the poorest countries converge towards the EU average? At the bottom of the list, two of the most recent member states of the EU, Romania and Bulgaria, come last in terms of GDP per capita. Whether these countries will be able to capitalize on their relatively low-wages to spur economic growth and experience the convergence towards the older member states of the union shown by countries such as Estonia, Czechia, and Lithuania, remains a pressing issue for these poorer member states.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Indonesia (FDI) Foreign Direct Investment: BPM6: Other Capital Flows: EU: Denmark data was reported at 6.000 USD mn in Jun 2019. This records a decrease from the previous number of 23.280 USD mn for Mar 2019. Indonesia (FDI) Foreign Direct Investment: BPM6: Other Capital Flows: EU: Denmark data is updated quarterly, averaging 0.135 USD mn from Sep 2013 (Median) to Jun 2019, with 24 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 23.280 USD mn in Mar 2019 and a record low of -18.490 USD mn in Sep 2018. Indonesia (FDI) Foreign Direct Investment: BPM6: Other Capital Flows: EU: Denmark data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Bank of Indonesia. The data is categorized under Indonesia Premium Database’s Investment – Table ID.OA003: Foreign Direct Investment: Other Capital.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Euro Area recorded a capital and financial account surplus of 44.24 EUR Billion in May of 2025. This dataset provides - Euro Area Capital Flows - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.