4 datasets found
  1. Distribution of Marshall Plan payments 1948-1952, per country

    • statista.com
    Updated Apr 9, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2021). Distribution of Marshall Plan payments 1948-1952, per country [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1227834/distribution-marshall-plan-by-country/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 9, 2021
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Apr 3, 1948 - Jun 30, 1952
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The European Recovery Program, more commonly known as the Marshall Plan, was a U.S. initiative to promote Europe's economic recovery in the aftermath of the Second World War. Between 1948 and 1952, the U.S. distributed approximately 13.3 billion U.S. dollars between the non-communist states of Western Europe, including Greece and Turkey. Notable exceptions from this aid were Spain, due to Franco's unpopularity in the U.S. (although this changed with the Pact of Madrid in 1953), and Finland, who opted out as they did not want to strain relations with the Soviet Union. While money was roughly split between nations based on population size, larger, industrialized countries received a disproportionately higher share of the aid as it was believed their success would trickle down to smaller states. Economic insignificance? The term "Marshall Plan" has become something of a synonym for economic recovery plans in recent decades, yet the modern consensus is that the economic impact of the original was fairly overstated at the time. This investment of capital did help, but European recovery was well underway before the first installments were paid by the U.S, and it was European integration which laid the groundwork for recovery. Unlike the period following the First World War, the victorious powers had learned that cooperation between former adversaries, rather than punishment and reparations, would be the key to future success. It was the ideological influence of the Marshall Plan had the largest impact; Western European business structures became more Americanized, international trade barriers and tariffs were removed, and the transition to more capitalist economies eventually led to the most prosperous period ever recorded in European history, known as the "Golden Age" (1950-1973). The Molotov Plan The initial proposal, made by George C. Marshall, actually invited the Soviet Union and Eastern Bloc states to take part in the offer, although this was a token gesture that U.S. knew would never be accepted. The Marshall Plan was announced in June 1947, just a few months after the Truman Doctrine; this was where the U.S. pledged to contain communist expansion across the globe, and is often regarded as the beginning of the Cold War. Not only did the Soviet Union reject the U.S. proposal, but Moscow also forbade any other Eastern Bloc country from taking part; instead the Soviets launched the Molotov Plan, which consolidated their economic power in the Eastern Bloc. While this plan initially rewarded Poland and Czechoslovakia for rejecting Americanization, the heavy reparations placed on the Axis powers meant that it was of little benefit to the likes of East Germany, Hungary, or Romania. Nonetheless, as the Marshall Plan changed the economic direction of Western Europe throughout the Cold War, the Molotov Plan helped shape communist economic development in the East. Eventually both plans developed into much larger endeavors, as the Mutual Security Act of 1951 saw American economic influence stretch beyond Europe, and the Council for Mutual Economic Assistance (COMECON) did the same for the Soviet Union.

  2. Quarterly USD exchange rate against the 10 most traded currencies worldwide...

    • statista.com
    Updated Nov 29, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Quarterly USD exchange rate against the 10 most traded currencies worldwide 2001-2025 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/655224/conversion-rate-of-major-currencies-to-the-us-dollar/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 29, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    Canada, Australia, United Kingdom, South Korea, Japan, Europe, China, Hong Kong, Worldwide, Switzerland
    Description

    A graphic that displays the dollar performance against other currencies reveals that economic developments had mixed results on currency exchanges. The third quarter of 2023 marked a period of disinflation in the euro area, while China's projected growth was projected to go up. The United States economy was said to have a relatively strong performance in Q3 2023, although growing capital market interest rate and the resumption of student loan repayments might dampen this growth at the end of 2023. A relatively weak Japanese yen Q3 2023 saw pressure from investors towards Japanese authorities on how they would respond to the situation surrounding the Japanese yen. The USD/JPY rate was close to ***, whereas analysts suspected it should be around ** given the country's purchase power parity. The main reason for this disparity is said to be the differences in central bank interest rates between the United States, the euro area, and Japan. Any future aggressive changes from, especially the U.S. Fed might lower those differences. Financial markets responded somewhat disappoint when Japan did not announce major plans to tackle the situation. Potential rent decreases in 2024 Central bank rates peak in 2023, although it is expected that some of these will decline in early 2024. That said, analysts expect overall policies will remain restrictive. For example, the Bank of England's interest rate remained unchanged at **** percent in Q3 2023. It is believed the United Kingdom's central bank will ease its interest rate in 2024 but less than either the U.S. Fed or the European Central Bank. This should be a positive development for the pound compared to either the euro or the dollar.

  3. U.S. loans and grants per Western European country 1946-1961

    • statista.com
    Updated Jan 1, 2015
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2015). U.S. loans and grants per Western European country 1946-1961 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1229325/us-loans-grants-post-wwii-western-europe-by-country/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 1, 2015
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Between 1946 and 1961, the United States distributed over 44.5 billion U.S. dollars to Western European countries in the form of loans or grants. 27.3 billion was given in the form of economic assistance, while 17.2 billion was given as military assistance. The largest sums were given to the United Kingdom and France, who received 8.8 and 8.4 billion dollars respectively. Italy and West Germany, who had been enemies of the U.S. during the Second World War, received the next-largest sums, with both totals over five billion dollars. Disproportional distributions Such grants and loans, particularly those of the Marshall Plan, were distributed on a (fairly rough) per capita basis, although major industrial powers were given disproportionately higher sums, as it was believed that their successful recovery would drive prosperity across the region. Turkey and Greece were also given relatively high sums due to their political and strategic significance during the Cold War, with Turkey receiving significantly more in military assistance than economic. In contrast, Spain received a disproportionately low sum - despite being neutral during the war, Franco's fascist government was unpopular in the U.S. and was excluded from aid in the years immediately following the war; the Spanish government's strong anti-communist saw the U.S. revert this policy with the Pact of Madrid in 1953. The Golden Age The "Golden Age" was a period of relatively uninterrupted economic growth between the end of the Second World War in 1945 and the Recession of 1973-1975. During this time, Western Europe experienced its most economically successful period in recorded history. This success was made possible by various factors, including an increase in European integration, the expansion of welfare and healthcare systems, and widespread industrialization. The United States played a key role in these developments; however, the modern historical consensus is that the largest impact was not through government investment, but rather private investment and the American influence on business practice, consumer buying behavior, and international policy (critics at the time referred to this as Coca-colonization). Along with the new-found peace following decades of war and instability, these factors combined to increase living standards and wages among the public, who generally embraced capitalism and the opportunity to spend their new-found disposable income.

  4. S

    Europe Leadership Development Program Market - Growth & Demand 2025 to 2035

    • futuremarketinsights.com
    html, pdf
    Updated May 2, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ronak Shah (2025). Europe Leadership Development Program Market - Growth & Demand 2025 to 2035 [Dataset]. https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/reports/europe-leadership-development-program-market
    Explore at:
    pdf, htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 2, 2025
    Authors
    Ronak Shah
    License

    https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.futuremarketinsights.com/privacy-policy

    Time period covered
    2025 - 2035
    Area covered
    Europe, Worldwide
    Description

    The overall market value for leadership development programs in Europe is projected to grow to USD 17,583 million by 2025, up to USD 42,397 million by 2035, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.2% during the forecast period.

    MetricValue
    Market Size in 2025USD 1 7,583 million
    Projected Market Size in 2035USD 42,397 million
    CAGR (2025 to 2035)9.2%

    Country-Wise Outlook

    CountryCAGR (2025 to 2035)
    United Kingdom9.4%
    CountryCAGR (2025 to 2035)
    Germany8.6%
    CountryCAGR (2025 to 2035)
    France9.0%
    CountryCAGR (2025 to 2035)
    Spain9.2%
    CountryCAGR (2025 to 2035)
    Italy9.5%

    Segmentation Outlook

    By Program ParticipantsMarket Share (2025)
    Business-Owners32%
    By Learner TypeMarket Share (2025)
    Group/Small Team Learners45%

    Competitive Outlook

    Company NameEstimated Market Share (%)
    FranklinCovey18-22%
    Dale Carnegie Training14-17%
    Korn Ferry10-13%
    Leadership Management International8-11%
    Center for Creative Leadership6-9%
    Other Companies (combined)30-35%
  5. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Statista (2021). Distribution of Marshall Plan payments 1948-1952, per country [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1227834/distribution-marshall-plan-by-country/
Organization logo

Distribution of Marshall Plan payments 1948-1952, per country

Explore at:
5 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
Dataset updated
Apr 9, 2021
Dataset authored and provided by
Statistahttp://statista.com/
Time period covered
Apr 3, 1948 - Jun 30, 1952
Area covered
United States
Description

The European Recovery Program, more commonly known as the Marshall Plan, was a U.S. initiative to promote Europe's economic recovery in the aftermath of the Second World War. Between 1948 and 1952, the U.S. distributed approximately 13.3 billion U.S. dollars between the non-communist states of Western Europe, including Greece and Turkey. Notable exceptions from this aid were Spain, due to Franco's unpopularity in the U.S. (although this changed with the Pact of Madrid in 1953), and Finland, who opted out as they did not want to strain relations with the Soviet Union. While money was roughly split between nations based on population size, larger, industrialized countries received a disproportionately higher share of the aid as it was believed their success would trickle down to smaller states. Economic insignificance? The term "Marshall Plan" has become something of a synonym for economic recovery plans in recent decades, yet the modern consensus is that the economic impact of the original was fairly overstated at the time. This investment of capital did help, but European recovery was well underway before the first installments were paid by the U.S, and it was European integration which laid the groundwork for recovery. Unlike the period following the First World War, the victorious powers had learned that cooperation between former adversaries, rather than punishment and reparations, would be the key to future success. It was the ideological influence of the Marshall Plan had the largest impact; Western European business structures became more Americanized, international trade barriers and tariffs were removed, and the transition to more capitalist economies eventually led to the most prosperous period ever recorded in European history, known as the "Golden Age" (1950-1973). The Molotov Plan The initial proposal, made by George C. Marshall, actually invited the Soviet Union and Eastern Bloc states to take part in the offer, although this was a token gesture that U.S. knew would never be accepted. The Marshall Plan was announced in June 1947, just a few months after the Truman Doctrine; this was where the U.S. pledged to contain communist expansion across the globe, and is often regarded as the beginning of the Cold War. Not only did the Soviet Union reject the U.S. proposal, but Moscow also forbade any other Eastern Bloc country from taking part; instead the Soviets launched the Molotov Plan, which consolidated their economic power in the Eastern Bloc. While this plan initially rewarded Poland and Czechoslovakia for rejecting Americanization, the heavy reparations placed on the Axis powers meant that it was of little benefit to the likes of East Germany, Hungary, or Romania. Nonetheless, as the Marshall Plan changed the economic direction of Western Europe throughout the Cold War, the Molotov Plan helped shape communist economic development in the East. Eventually both plans developed into much larger endeavors, as the Mutual Security Act of 1951 saw American economic influence stretch beyond Europe, and the Council for Mutual Economic Assistance (COMECON) did the same for the Soviet Union.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu