4 datasets found
  1. a

    Homicide Rate

    • data-lahub.opendata.arcgis.com
    • geohub.lacity.org
    • +2more
    Updated Dec 19, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    County of Los Angeles (2023). Homicide Rate [Dataset]. https://data-lahub.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/lacounty::homicide-rate
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 19, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    County of Los Angeles
    Area covered
    Description

    This indicator is based on location of residence. Mortality rate has been age-adjusted to the 2000 U.S. standard population. ICD 10 codes used to identify homicides are X85-Y09, Y87.1, and U01-U02. Single-year data are only available for Los Angeles County overall, Service Planning Areas, Supervisorial Districts, City of Los Angeles overall, and City of Los Angeles Council Districts.Violence is a public health crisis in the US, with gun violence being a major driver. Almost three quarters of homicides involve firearms. In the US, the age-adjusted homicide rate from firearms is more than 20 times higher than in the European Union or in Australia. Significant disparities by age, sex, and race and ethnicity exist, with young adults ages 15-34 years, males, and Black individuals most disproportionately impacted. Comprehensive prevention strategies should work to address the underlying physical, social, economic, and structural conditions known to increase risk.For more information about the Community Health Profiles Data Initiative, please see the initiative homepage.

  2. a

    Firearm Mortality

    • egis-lacounty.hub.arcgis.com
    • ph-lacounty.hub.arcgis.com
    • +2more
    Updated Dec 19, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    County of Los Angeles (2023). Firearm Mortality [Dataset]. https://egis-lacounty.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/firearm-mortality
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 19, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    County of Los Angeles
    Area covered
    Description

    Mortality rate from firearms includes homicides, suicides, accidental deaths, deaths by law enforcement, and deaths for which intent was undetermined. Mortality rate is based on the location of residence and has been age-adjusted to the 2000 U.S. standard population. ICD 10 codes used to identify firearm deaths are W32-W34, X72-X74, X93-X95, Y22-Y24, Y35.0, and U01.4. Single-year data are only available for Los Angeles County overall, Service Planning Areas, Supervisorial Districts, City of Los Angeles overall, and City of Los Angeles Council Districts.Violence is a public health crisis in the US, with gun violence being a major driver. In the US, the age-adjusted homicide rate from firearms is more than 20 times higher than in the European Union or in Australia. Significant disparities by age, sex, and race and ethnicity exist, with young adults (ages 15-34 years), males, and Black individuals most disproportionately impacted. Firearm-related suicides disproportionately impact older, White men. Comprehensive prevention strategies should work to address underlying physical, social, economic, and structural conditions known to increase risk.For more information about the Community Health Profiles Data Initiative, please see the initiative homepage.

  3. w

    Global Forensic Technology Service Market Research Report: By Application...

    • wiseguyreports.com
    Updated Sep 15, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2025). Global Forensic Technology Service Market Research Report: By Application (Criminal Investigation, Civil Litigation, Cybersecurity, Insurance Fraud Investigations, Regulatory Compliance), By Service Type (Digital Forensics, Fraud Investigation Services, Data Recovery Services, Incident Response Services, Expert Witness Services), By End Use (Law Enforcement, Legal Firms, Corporate Entities, Insurance Companies, Government Agencies), By Technology (Forensic Software, Forensic Hardware, Database Forensics, Cloud Forensics, Mobile Forensics) and By Regional (North America, Europe, South America, Asia Pacific, Middle East and Africa) - Forecast to 2035 [Dataset]. https://www.wiseguyreports.com/reports/forensic-technology-service-market
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 15, 2025
    License

    https://www.wiseguyreports.com/pages/privacy-policyhttps://www.wiseguyreports.com/pages/privacy-policy

    Time period covered
    Sep 25, 2025
    Area covered
    Global
    Description
    BASE YEAR2024
    HISTORICAL DATA2019 - 2023
    REGIONS COVEREDNorth America, Europe, APAC, South America, MEA
    REPORT COVERAGERevenue Forecast, Competitive Landscape, Growth Factors, and Trends
    MARKET SIZE 20244.9(USD Billion)
    MARKET SIZE 20255.15(USD Billion)
    MARKET SIZE 20358.5(USD Billion)
    SEGMENTS COVEREDApplication, Service Type, End Use, Technology, Regional
    COUNTRIES COVEREDUS, Canada, Germany, UK, France, Russia, Italy, Spain, Rest of Europe, China, India, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, Rest of APAC, Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Rest of South America, GCC, South Africa, Rest of MEA
    KEY MARKET DYNAMICSRising crime rates, Technological advancements, Increasing cybercrime, Regulatory compliance demands, Growing demand for evidence analysis
    MARKET FORECAST UNITSUSD Billion
    KEY COMPANIES PROFILEDVeriCryp, Palantir Technologies, AccessData, Cellebrite, FRACTAL Analytics, LexisNexis, FTK Imager, IEEE 802, SANS Institute, Digital Detective, BioRad Laboratories, Lynn Peavey Company, CaseGuard, ClariSights, Magnet Forensics, X1 Discovery
    MARKET FORECAST PERIOD2025 - 2035
    KEY MARKET OPPORTUNITIESIncreased cybercrime demand, Advanced AI integration, Expansion in forensic analytics, Growing regulatory compliance needs, Rising adoption in incident response
    COMPOUND ANNUAL GROWTH RATE (CAGR) 5.2% (2025 - 2035)
  4. d

    Candidate Countries Eurobarometer 2003.3 - Dataset - B2FIND

    • demo-b2find.dkrz.de
    Updated Sep 20, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2025). Candidate Countries Eurobarometer 2003.3 - Dataset - B2FIND [Dataset]. http://demo-b2find.dkrz.de/dataset/a16c7b53-d24c-5e11-b792-afbddd029da0
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 20, 2025
    Description

    Die Themenschwerpunkte sind:1. Einstellung zum Zusammenwachsen der EU.2. Einstellung zu EU-Richtlinien.3. Kommunikationsmedien.4. Innenpolitische Sicherheitsfragen. Themen: 1. Tatsächlich erwartete und erwünschte Bedeutung der EU im Lebendes Befragten in fünf Jahren; EU oder eigene Nation als präferierteEntscheidungsinstanz in Verteidigung, Umweltschutz, Währung, humanitäreHilfe, Gesundheit und Soziales, Pressefreiheit, Kampf gegen Armut undsoziale Ausgrenzung, Kampf gegen Arbeitslosigkeit, Agrarpolitik,Unterstützung wirtschaftlich benachteiligter Regionen, Ausbildung,Forschung, Informationen über die EU, deren Politik und Institutionen,Außenpolitik, Kulturpolitik, Einwanderungspolitik, Richtlinien fürpolitisches Asyl, Kampf gegen organisierte Kriminalität, Polizei,Rechtswesen, Flüchtlingsaufnahme, Maßnahmen gegen Jugendkriminalität,Maßnahmen gegen Kriminalität in der Stadt, Drogen- und Menschenhandel,internationaler Terrorismus; Einstellung zu einem verstärktenZusammenwachsen der EU: gemeinsame Währung, Außenpolitik undSicherheitspolitik. 2. Abwahl von EU-Präsident und Kommissaren auch durch das Parlament;Befürworten von EU-Themen im Schulunterricht; Bewertung von Fragen derSicherheitspolitik: schnelle militärische Eingreiftruppe, gemeinsameKrisenbewältigung, europäischer Außenminister, Sitz imUN-Sicherheitsrat, Integration neutraler Staaten und vonBeitrittsanwärtern, Unabhängigkeit von den USA, Kampf fürMenschenrechte, gemeinsame Einwanderungspolitik und Asylpolitik;Einstellung zum Subsidaritätsprinzip bei der Verteidigungspolitik;Einstellung zur Rolle der USA und der EU bei der Schaffung von Frieden,dem Kampf gegen den Terrorismus, Wachstum der Weltwirtschaft, Kampfgegen die Armut der Welt und Umweltschutz; präferierte Politikbereiche,in denen die EU aktiv sein sollte. 3. Nutzung von Kommunikationsmedien (Computer, Telefon, TV); Art desInternetzugangs (zu Hause, Büro, Schule, Universität, Internetcafe);Nutzungsfrequenz des Internets; Gründe für Nichtnutzung des Internets;Gründe, das Internet zu nutzen; Vorzüge des Internets; Gründe, imInternet zu surfen; Computertraining in der Schule, bei der Arbeit oderdurch Kurse; durchgeführte Telearbeit und Interesse an einer solcheBeschäftigung. 4. Intensität der Besorgnis in Zusammenhang mit der EU bezüglichArbeitslosigkeit, Zollbetrug, Terrorismus, Betrug am Konsumenten,Drogenschmuggel und Konsum, organisiertem Verbrechen, Missbrauch vonBürgerrechten durch Autoritäten, Kleinkriminalität, Korruption, Krieg,illegale Immigration, Finanzkriminalität und Geldwäsche, Bedrohung desWohlfahrtsstatus und steigende Ungleichheit, Menschenhandel; präferierteAktionen auf EU-Ebene in diesen Bereichen; wichtige innenpolitischeFragen und Wunsch nach EU-Aktivitäten bei der Kriminalitätsbekämpfungund der Verstärkung der Sicherheitskräfte (Polizei und privat);Einstufung von Aufenthaltsrecht und Asylrecht als Grundrechte;Einstellung zu Immigranten und ihnen zugestandene Rechte (Skala);Einstellung zu Asylbewerbern (Skala); Einstellung zu Bemühungen der EUzur Harmonisierung und Förderung von Menschenrechten und Bürgerrechten;Einstellung zur Regelung juristischer Fragen bei der internationalenKriminalitätsbekämpfung in den EU-Ländern und bei freiem Grenzverkehr(Skala); Zufriedenheit mit den persönlichen Chancen des Zugangs, mit denPreisen, der Qualität, der Information, der Vertragsgestaltung und derBandlung von Beschwerden bei Basisversorgung wie Mobiltelefonservice,Festnetztelefonservice, Elektrizität, Gasanschluss, Wasseranschluss,Post, ÖPNV, Bahn; Kundenzufriedenheit mit diesen Versorgern. Demographie: Nationalität; Familienstand; höchster Bildungsabschluss;Geburtsjahr; Haushaltsgröße; Personen unter 15 Jahren im Haushalt;Personen über 24 Jahren im Haushalt; Besitz langlebigerWirtschaftsgüter (Immobilie, Unterhaltungsmedien,Haushaltsgeräte, Computer, Auto); berufliche Position; Beschäftigung imöffentlichen Dienst; Urbanisierungsgrad; Religionszugehörigkeit;Kirchgangshäufigkeit; Haushaltseinkommen; Parteipräferenz; Geschlecht. Attitudes towards the European Union and the enlargement process.Attitudes towards EU directives. Media use. Issues on internalsecurity. Topics: Expected and desired role of the EU in five year’s time;support for joint EU decision-making (defence, environmentalprotection, currency, health, social welfare, humanitarian aid,unemployment, agriculture, education, scientific and technologicalresearch, information on EU, foreign policy, culture, immigration,asylum, justice, crime, police, drugs and human trafficking,international terrorism); resignation of the President of the EuropeanCommission; opinion towards a certain number of key EU issues (teachingschool children about the EU, common defence policy, enlargement of theEU, common foreign policy, EU being responsible for unhandled matters,one single currency); geopolitical orientation (attitudes to UnitedStates, role in maintaining peace in the world, EU vs. US); media use(computer, TV, telephone); Internet access and use; reason for usingthe Internet; advantages of the Internet; computer training at schooland work; interest in teleworking; concern about unemployment, customsfraud, terrorism, cheating the customer, drug trafficking and usage,organized crime, citizen’s rights, crime, corruption, war, immigration,financial crime, threats to welfare state, human trafficking; preferredactions in these fields on EU level; support for joint decision-makingin foreign policy; support for a common defence policy among the memberstates of the EU; support for „European Army”; Elements of CommonForeign and Security Policy; common asylum policy, future memberstates’ say in foreign and defence policy; own seat in the UnitedNations Security Council; common European Foreign Minister; neutralmember states’ say in EU foreign and defence policy; preferred level ofdecision-making regarding European defence policy; guarantees for therights of citizens; usage and satisfaction with utilities and basicservices; accessibility, quality and pricing of mobile/fixed telephone,electricity supply, gas supply, water supply, postal, transport, railservices; information on and clear contracts with the serviceproviders; complaints and customer services. Demography: Nationality; marital status; age; age at termination ofschool training; educational level; size of household; occupationalstatus; employment in the public sector; position in the household;size of community; church attendance; income of the household; partypreference; gender.

  5. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
County of Los Angeles (2023). Homicide Rate [Dataset]. https://data-lahub.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/lacounty::homicide-rate

Homicide Rate

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Dec 19, 2023
Dataset authored and provided by
County of Los Angeles
Area covered
Description

This indicator is based on location of residence. Mortality rate has been age-adjusted to the 2000 U.S. standard population. ICD 10 codes used to identify homicides are X85-Y09, Y87.1, and U01-U02. Single-year data are only available for Los Angeles County overall, Service Planning Areas, Supervisorial Districts, City of Los Angeles overall, and City of Los Angeles Council Districts.Violence is a public health crisis in the US, with gun violence being a major driver. Almost three quarters of homicides involve firearms. In the US, the age-adjusted homicide rate from firearms is more than 20 times higher than in the European Union or in Australia. Significant disparities by age, sex, and race and ethnicity exist, with young adults ages 15-34 years, males, and Black individuals most disproportionately impacted. Comprehensive prevention strategies should work to address the underlying physical, social, economic, and structural conditions known to increase risk.For more information about the Community Health Profiles Data Initiative, please see the initiative homepage.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu