City of Everett, MA GIS Maps - including PDFs

City of Everett, MA GIS Viewer

These data provide an accurate high-resolution shoreline compiled from imagery of Port of Everett, WA . This vector shoreline data is based on an office interpretation of imagery that may be suitable as a geographic information system (GIS) data layer. This metadata describes information for both the line and point shapefiles. The NGS attribution scheme 'Coastal Cartographic Object Attribute Source Table (C-COAST)' was developed to conform the attribution of various sources of shoreline data into one attribution catalog. C-COAST is not a recognized standard, but was influenced by the International Hydrographic Organization's S-57 Object-Attribute standard so the data would be more accurately translated into S-57. This resource is a member of https://inport.nmfs.noaa.gov/inport/item/39808

These data were automated to provide an accurate high-resolution historical shoreline of Everett, Washington suitable as a geographic information system (GIS) data layer. These data are derived from shoreline maps that were produced by the NOAA National Ocean Service including its predecessor agencies which were based on an office interpretation of imagery and/or field survey. The NGS attribution scheme 'Coastal Cartographic Object Attribute Source Table (C-COAST)' was developed to conform the attribution of various sources of shoreline data into one attribution catalog. C-COAST is not a recognized standard, but was influenced by the International Hydrographic Organization's S-57 Object-Attribute standard so the data would be more accurately translated into S-57. This resource is a member of https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/39808

Includes the recently updated Commercial Triangle EED.

Geospatial data about Snohomish County, WA Hospital Commissioner Districts. Export to CAD, GIS, PDF, CSV and access via API.

These data provide an accurate high-resolution shoreline compiled from imagery of PUGET SOUND, EVERETT TO SPRING BEACH, WA . This vector shoreline data is based on an office interpretation of imagery that may be suitable as a geographic information system (GIS) data layer. This metadata describes information for both the line and point shapefiles. The NGS attribution scheme 'Coastal Cartographic Object Attribute Source Table (C-COAST)' was developed to conform the attribution of various sources of shoreline data into one attribution catalog. C-COAST is not a recognized standard, but was influenced by the International Hydrographic Organization's S-57 Object-Attribute standard so the data would be more accurately translated into S-57. This resource is a member of https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/39808

A 300 x 600 m integrated terrain unit map (ITUM) was produced at 1:500 scale inside the 350 x 650 m Martinelli grid, and the 1:500 digital elevation model (DEM). Vegetation was mapped using Komarkova's (1979) classification system (Braun-Blanquet) units. All map units were mapped to 1/8-inch minimum map-polygon-size resolution. The map is part of the Martinelli grid geographic information system (GIS). Many GIS projects use an approach in which existing mapped information is digitized into the GIS database directly from the original sources. The maps may have different map scale, map-unit resolutions, dates of data collection, and classification systems. When these different sources are combined in a GIS, artifacts may arise due to boundary mismatches and scale incompatibility (Dangermond and Harnden 1990). Integrated geobotanical mapping can minimize many of these problems. This method simultaneously maps vegetation and other terrain features that are interpreted on a common air-photo base (Everett et al. 1978, Walker et al. 1980). We use the term geobotany in its traditional European sense to refer to the study of plant communities and their relationships to geology, landforms, and soils (Braun-Blanquet 1932). Terrain geomorphic boundaries are used to guide the delineation on aerial photographs of most major vegetation boundaries similiar to the landscape-guided vegetation mapping approach developed in Europe (Zonneveld 1988) and the integrated terrain unit mapping approach developed by the Environmental System Research Institute in Redlands, CA (Dangermond and Harnden 1990). Additional information concerning the Niwot Ridge LTER GIS can be found in Walker et al. (1993). [1]Braun-Blanquet, J. 1932. Plant sociology: The study of plant communities. New York: McGraw-Hill, 439 pp. [2]Everett, K.R., P.J. Webber, D.A. Walker, R.J. Parkinson, and J. Brown. 1978. A geoecological mapping scheme for Alaskan coastal tundra. Third International Conference on Permafrost, 10-13 July 1978, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. [3]Komarkova, V. 1979. Alpine vegetation of the Indian Peaks area, Front Range, Colorado Rocky Mountains. Vaduz (Germany): J. Cramer, 591 pp. [4]Walker, D.A., K.R. Everett, P.J. Webber, and J. Brown. 1980. Geobotanical atlas of the Prudhoe Bay region, Alaska. United States Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, CRREL Report #80, Hanover, NH, 69 pp. [5]Zonneveld, I.S. 1988. The ITC method of mapping natural and semi- natural vegetation. Pp. 401-426 in Kuchler, A.W., and I.S. Zonneveld (eds.). Vegetation mapping. Boston: Kluwer Academic. [6]Dangermond, J., and E. Harnden. 1990. Map data standardization: A methodology for integrating thematic cartographic data before automation. ARC News 12(2): 16-19. [7]Walker, D.A., J.C. Halfpenny, M.D. Walker, and C.A. Wessman. 1993. Long-term studies of snow-vegetation interactions. Bioscience 43(5): 287-301. [8]Walker, D.A., B.E. Lewis, W.B. Krantz, E.T. Price, and R.D. Tabler. 1994. Hierarchic studies of snow-ecosystem interactions: A 100-year snow-alteration experiment. Pp. 407-414 In: Ferrik, M. (ed.). Proceedings of the Fiftieth Annual Eastern and Western Snow Conference, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada, 8-10 June 1993. 441 pp.

A 350 x 500 m integrated terrain unit map (ITUM) was produced at 1:500 scale inside the 350 x 500 m saddle grid, and the 1:500 digital elevation model (DEM). Vegetation was mapped using Komarkova's (1979) classification system (Braun-Blanquet) units. All map units were mapped to 1/8-inch minimum map-polygon-size resolution. The map is part of the Saddle grid geographic information system (GIS). Many GIS projects use an approach in which existing mapped information is digitized into the GIS database directly from the original sources. The maps may have different map scale, map-unit resolutions, dates of data collection, and classification systems. When these different sources are combined in a GIS, artifacts may arise due to boundary mismatches and scale incompatibility (Dangermond and Harnden 1990). Integrated geobotanical mapping can minimize many of these problems. This method simultaneously maps vegetation and other terrain features that are interpreted on a common air-photo base (Everett et al. 1978, Walker et al. 1980). We use the term geobotany in its traditional European sense to refer to the study of plant communities and their relationships to geology, landforms, and soils (Braun-Blanquet 1932). Terrain geomorphic boundaries are used to guide the delineation on aerial photographs of most major vegetation boundaries similiar to the landscape-guided vegetation mapping approach developed in Europe (Zonneveld 1988) and the integrated terrain unit mapping approach developed by the Environmental System Research Institute in Redlands, CA (Dangermond and Harnden 1990). Additional information concerning the Niwot Ridge LTER GIS can be found in Walker et al. (1993). [1]Braun-Blanquet, J. 1932. Plant sociology: The study of plant communities. New York: McGraw-Hill, 439 pp. [2]Everett, K.R., P.J. Webber, D.A. Walker, R.J. Parkinson, and J. Brown. 1978. A geoecological mapping scheme for Alaskan coastal tundra. Third International Conference on Permafrost, 10-13 July 1978, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. [3]Komarkova, V. 1979. Alpine vegetation of the Indian Peaks area, Front Range, Colorado Rocky Mountains. Vaduz (Germany): J. Cramer, 591 pp. [4]Walker, D.A., K.R. Everett, P.J. Webber, and J. Brown. 1980. Geobotanical atlas of the Prudhoe Bay region, Alaska. United States Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, CRREL Report #80, Hanover, NH, 69 pp. [5]Halfpenny, J.C., K.P. Ingraham, J.A. Adams. 1983. Working Atlas for the Saddle, Niwot Ridge, Front Range, Colorado. Long-Term Ecolological Research Data Report, April 1983, 24 pp. [6]Zonneveld, I.S. 1988. The ITC method of mapping natural and semi- natural vegetation. Pp. 401-426 in Kuchler, A.W., and I.S. Zonneveld (eds.). Vegetation mapping. Boston: Kluwer Academic. [7]Dangermond, J., and E. Harnden. 1990. Map data standardization: A methodology for integrating thematic cartographic data before automation. ARC News 12(2): 16-19. [8]Walker, D.A., J.C. Halfpenny, M.D. Walker, and C.A. Wessman. 1993. Long-term studies of snow-vegetation interactions. Bioscience 43(5): 287-301. [9]Walker, D.A., B.E. Lewis, W.B. Krantz, E.T. Price, and R.D. Tabler. 1994. Hierarchic studies of snow-ecosystem interactions: A 100-year snow-alteration experiment. Pp. 407-414 In: Ferrik, M. (ed.). Proceedings of the Fiftieth Annual Eastern and Western Snow Conference, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada, 8-10 June 1993. 441 pp. NOTE: This EML metadata file does not contain important geospatial data processing information. Before using any NWT LTER geospatial data read the arcgis metadata XML file in either ISO or FGDC compliant format, using ArcGIS software (ArcCatalog > description), or by viewing the .xml file provided with the geospatial dataset.

Puget Sound 2002 - 1 foot Aerials for ArcGIS Online/Bing Maps/Google Maps, etc. Includes areas north to Everett; east to Monroe, Sammamish, and Buckley; west to Vashon, Bremerton, and Gig Harbor; South to Roy.Contact Info: Name: GIS Team Email: GISteam@cityoftacoma.orgCompany: Triathlon, Inc.Flight Date: June, 2002Original ArcGIS coordinate system: Type: Projected Geographic coordinate reference: GCS_North_American_1983_HARN Projection: NAD_1983_HARN_StatePlane_Washington_South_FIPS_4602_Feet Well-known identifier: 2927Geographic extent - Bounding rectangle: West longitude: -122.695504 East longitude: -121.932319 North latitude: 48.027739 South latitude: 46.980475Extent in the item's coordinate system: West longitude: 1103000.000000 East longitude: 1283000.000000 South latitude: 608000.000000 North latitude: 986000.000000