49 datasets found
  1. g

    European Values Study 2017: Integrated Dataset (EVS 2017)

    • search.gesis.org
    • datacatalogue.cessda.eu
    • +1more
    Updated May 16, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Gedeshi, Ilir; Pachulia, Merab; Poghosyan, Gevorg; Rotman, David; Kritzinger, Sylvia; Fotev, Georgy; Kolenović-Đapo, Jadranka; Baloban, Josip; Baloban, Stjepan; Rabušic, Ladislav; Frederiksen, Morten; Saar, Erki; Ketola, Kimmo; Wolf, Christof; Pachulia, Merab; Bréchon, Pierre; Voas, David; Rosta, Gergely; Jónsdóttir, Guðbjörg A.; Rovati, Giancarlo; Ziliukaite, Ruta; Petkovska, Antoanela; Komar, Olivera; Reeskens, Tim; Jenssen, Anders T.; Soboleva, Natalia; Marody, Mirosława; Voicu, Bogdan; Strapcová, Katarina; Bešić, Miloš; Uhan, Samo; Silvestre Cabrera, María; Wallman-Lundåsen, Susanne; Ernst Stähli, Michèle; Ramos, Alice; Balakireva, Olga; Mieriņa, Inta (2022). European Values Study 2017: Integrated Dataset (EVS 2017) [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.4232/1.13897
    Explore at:
    (12272043), (9726384)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 16, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    GESIS search
    GESIS
    Authors
    Gedeshi, Ilir; Pachulia, Merab; Poghosyan, Gevorg; Rotman, David; Kritzinger, Sylvia; Fotev, Georgy; Kolenović-Đapo, Jadranka; Baloban, Josip; Baloban, Stjepan; Rabušic, Ladislav; Frederiksen, Morten; Saar, Erki; Ketola, Kimmo; Wolf, Christof; Pachulia, Merab; Bréchon, Pierre; Voas, David; Rosta, Gergely; Jónsdóttir, Guðbjörg A.; Rovati, Giancarlo; Ziliukaite, Ruta; Petkovska, Antoanela; Komar, Olivera; Reeskens, Tim; Jenssen, Anders T.; Soboleva, Natalia; Marody, Mirosława; Voicu, Bogdan; Strapcová, Katarina; Bešić, Miloš; Uhan, Samo; Silvestre Cabrera, María; Wallman-Lundåsen, Susanne; Ernst Stähli, Michèle; Ramos, Alice; Balakireva, Olga; Mieriņa, Inta
    License

    https://www.gesis.org/en/institute/data-usage-termshttps://www.gesis.org/en/institute/data-usage-terms

    Time period covered
    Jun 19, 2017 - Oct 1, 2021
    Variables measured
    year - survey year, dweight - Design Weight, v225 - sex respondent (Q63), studyno - GESIS study number, gweight - Calibration weights, mode - mode of data collection, doi - Digital Object Identifier, v277 - date of interview (Q107), version - GESIS archive version, pweight - Population size weight, and 464 more
    Description

    The European Values Study is a large-scale, cross-national and longitudinal survey research program on how Europeans think about family, work, religion, politics, and society. Repeated every nine years in an increasing number of countries, the survey provides insights into the ideas, beliefs, preferences, attitudes, values, and opinions of citizens all over Europe.

    As previous waves conducted in 1981, 1990, 1999, 2008, the fifth EVS wave maintains a persistent focus on a broad range of values. Questions are highly comparable across waves and regions, making EVS suitable for research aimed at studying trends over time.

    The new wave has seen a strengthening of the methodological standards. The full release of the EVS 2017 includes data and documentation of altogether 37 participating countries. For more information, please go to the EVS website.

    Morale, religious, societal, political, work, and family values of Europeans.

    Topics: 1. Perceptions of life: importance of work, family, friends and acquaintances, leisure time, politics and religion; happiness; self-assessment of own health; memberships in voluntary organisations (religious or church organisations, cultural activities, trade unions, political parties or groups, environment, ecology, animal rights, professional associations, sports, recreation, or other groups, none); active or inactive membership of humanitarian or charitable organisation, consumer organisation, self-help group or mutual aid; voluntary work in the last six months; tolerance towards minorities (people of a different race, heavy drinkers, immigrants, foreign workers, drug addicts, homosexuals, Christians, Muslims, Jews, and gypsies - social distance); trust in people; estimation of people´s fair and helpful behavior; internal or external control; satisfaction with life; importance of educational goals: desirable qualities of children.

    1. Work: attitude towards work (job needed to develop talents, receiving money without working is humiliating, people turn lazy not working, work is a duty towards society, work always comes first); importance of selected aspects of occupational work; give priority to nationals over foreigners as well as men over women in jobs.

    2. Religion and morale: religious denomination; current and former religious denomination; current frequency of church attendance and at the age of 12; self-assessment of religiousness; belief in God, life after death, hell, heaven, and re-incarnation; personal god vs. spirit or life force; importance of God in one´s life (10-point-scale); frequency of prayers; morale attitudes (scale: claiming state benefits without entitlement, cheating on taxes, taking soft drugs, accepting a bribe, homosexuality, abortion, divorce, euthanasia, suicide, paying cash to avoid taxes, casual sex, avoiding fare on public transport, prostitution, in-vitro fertilization, political violence, death penalty).

    3. Family: trust in family; most important criteria for a successful marriage or partnership (faithfulness, adequate income, good housing, sharing household chores, children, time for friends and personal hobbies); marriage is an outdated institution; attitude towards traditional understanding of one´s role of man and woman in occupation and family (gender roles); homosexual couples are as good parents as other couples; duty towards society to have children; responsibility of adult children for their parents when they are in need of long-term care; to make own parents proud is a main goal in life.

    4. Politics and society: political interest; political participation; preference for individual freedom or social equality; self-assessment on a left-right continuum (10-point-scale) (left-right self-placement); individual vs. state responsibility for providing; take any job vs. right to refuse job when unemployed; competition good vs. harmful for people; equal incomes vs. incentives for individual effort; private vs. government ownership of business and industry; postmaterialism (scale); most important aims of the country for the next ten years; willingness to fight for the country; expectation of future development (less importance placed on work and greater respect for authority); trust in institutions; essential characteristics of democracy; importance of democracy for the respondent; rating democracy in own country; satisfaction with the political system in the country; preferred type of political system (strong leader, expert decisions, army should ...

  2. c

    Data from: Joint EVS/WVS 2017-2022 Dataset (Joint EVS/WVS)

    • datacatalogue.cessda.eu
    • eprints.soton.ac.uk
    • +3more
    Updated Jun 26, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Gedeshi, Ilir; Rotman, David; Pachulia, Merab; Poghosyan, Gevorg; Kritzinger, Sylvia; Fotev, Georgy; Kolenović-Đapo, Jadranka; Baloban, Josip; Baloban, Stjepan; Rabušic, Ladislav; Frederiksen, Morten; Saar, Erki; Ketola, Kimmo; Pachulia, Merab; Wolf, Christof; Bréchon, Pierre; Voas, David; Rosta, Gergely; Rovati, Giancarlo; Jónsdóttir, Guðbjörg A.; Petkovska, Antoanela; Ziliukaite, Ruta; Reeskens, Tim; Jenssen, Anders T.; Komar, Olivera; Voicu, Bogdan; Soboleva, Natalia; Marody, Mirosława; Bešić, Miloš; Strapcová, Katarina; Uhan, Samo; Silvestre Cabrera, María; Wallman-Lundåsen, Susanne; Ernst Stähli, Michèle; Ramos, Alice; Micó Ibáñez, Joan; Carballo, Marita; McAllister, Ian; Foa, Roberto Stefan (PI Bangladesh); Moreno Morales, Daniel E.; de Oliveira de Castro, Henrique Carlos; Lagos, Marta; Zhong, Yang; Casas, Andres (PI Colombia); Yesilada, Birol (PI Cyprus); Paez, Cristina; Abdel Latif, Abdel Hamid; Jennings, Will (PI Ethiopia); Welzel, Christian; Koniordos. Sokratis; Díaz Argueta, Julio César; Cheng, Edmund; Gravelle, Timothy (PI Indonesia); Stoker, Gerry; Dagher, Munqith; Yamazaki, Seiko; Braizat, Fares; Rakisheva, Botagoz; Bakaloff, Yuri; Haerpfer, Christian (PI Lebanon); Wing-yat Yu, Eilo; Lee, Grace; Moreno, Alejandro; Souvanlasy, Chansada; Perry, Paul; Denton, Carlos (PI Nicaragua); Puranen, Bi (PI Nigeria); Gilani, Bilal; Romero, Catalina; Guerrero, Linda; Hernández Acosta, Javier J.; Voicu, Bogdan; Zavadskaya, Margarita; Veskovic, Nino; Auh, Soo Young; Tsai, Ming-Chang; Olimov, Muzaffar; Bureekul, Thawilwadee; Ben Hafaiedh, Abdelwahab; Esmer, Yilmaz; Inglehart, Ronald; Depouilly, Xavier; Norris, Pippa (PI Zimbabwe); Balakireva, Olga; Lachapelle, Guy; Mathews, Mathew; Mieriņa, Inta; Manasyan, Heghine; Ekstroem, Anna M. (PI Kenya); Swehli, Nedal; Riyaz, Aminath; Tseveen, Tsetsenbileg; Abderebbi, Mhammed; Verhoeven, Piet; Briceno-Leon, Roberto; Moravec, Vaclav; Duffy, Bobby; Stoneman, Paul; Kosnac, Pavol; Zuasnabar, Ignacio; Kumar, Sanjay; Uzbekistan: not specified for security reasons (2024). Joint EVS/WVS 2017-2022 Dataset (Joint EVS/WVS) [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.4232/1.14320
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 26, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Bahcesehir University, Turkey
    Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan ROC
    Diwan Research, Tripoli, Libya
    Indochina Research Ltd Vietnam
    Public Opinion Research Institute, Kazakhstan
    Department of Sociology, Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Budapest, Hungary
    Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
    The Center of Sociological and Political Research, Belarus State University, Minsk, Belarus
    Central Asia Barometer, Kyrgyzstan
    Laboratory for Comparative Social Research, Higher School of Economics, Russia
    Monash University Malaysia
    Portland State University, USA
    Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
    Korean Social Science Data Center/ Ewha Womans University, South Korea
    GORBI (Georgian Opinion Research Business International), Tbilisi, Georgia
    Department of Social Sciences, GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim, Germany
    University of Crete, Greece
    Saar Poll, Tallinn, Estonia
    Laboratorio de Ciencias Sociales (LACSO), Caracas, Venezuela
    Institut d’études politiques de Grenoble, Grenoble, France
    Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
    Department of Sociology, Vilnius University, Lithuania
    King’s College London, Great Britain
    Faculty of Social Studies, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
    FORS, Swiss Foundation for Research in Social Sciences, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
    Institut d’Estudis Andorrans, Centre de Recerca Sociològica (CRES), Andorra
    Department of Social Science, University College London, Great Britain
    Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Germany
    Faculty for Social Wellbeing, New Bulgarian University, Sofia, Bulgaria
    Department of Government and International Studies, Hong Kong
    Lokniti - Centre for the Study of Developing Societies, Delhi, India
    Applied Social Science Forum, Tunisia
    King Prajadhipok’s Institute, Thailand
    CID/Gallup, S.A.
    Statistics Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
    University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
    Department of Social Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden
    Global for Survey and Consulting, Casablanca, Morocco
    Public Opinion Research Center of School of International and Public Affairs at Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China
    Department of Sociology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands
    Department of Sociology, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, North Macedonia
    Australian National University
    International Institute for Administration and Social Survey (IIACSS), Jordan
    Social Weather Stations, Philippines
    Romanian Academy, Research Institute for Quality of Life
    University of Southampton, UK
    Dentsu Institute, Japan
    Escuela de Trabajo Social, Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala
    Singidunum University Belgrade, Serbia
    Catholic Faculty of Theology, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia (since September 2019)
    School of People, Environment and Planning, Massey University, New Zealand
    Social Monitoring Center, Ukraine (WVS wave 7); Institute Economy and Prognoses, National Academy of Ukraine, Department of Monitoring Research of the Social and Economic Process, Kiev, Ukraine (EVS 2017)
    Concordia University, Canada
    University of Melbourne, Australia
    Faculty of Social Sciences, Public Opinion and Mass Communication Research, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
    Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México
    IRL (Indochina Research Laos) Myanmar Limited
    CIUDADANIA, Comunidad de Estudios Sociales y Acción Pública, Bolivia
    Instituto de Ciências Sociais, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal
    Faculty of Philosophy, University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Center for Social Norms and Behaviroal Dynamics, University of Pennsylvania, USA
    De Facto Consultancy, Podgorica, Montenegro
    Catholic Faculty of Theology, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
    IPSOS Ecuador
    NAMA Strategic Intelligence Solutions, Jordan
    Maldives National University, Malé, Maldives
    CRRC-Armenia, Yerevan, Armenia
    Kirkon tutkimuskeskus, Tampere, Finland
    Karolinska University, Sweden
    Egyptian Research and Training Center, Egypt
    Harvard University, USA
    DEKK Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia
    Faculty of Political Sciences, University of Belgrade, Serbia
    Department of Government and Public Administration, University of Macau, Macao, China
    Institute of Philosophy, Mongolian Academy of Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
    Institute of Policy Studies, National University of Singapore, Singapore
    Universidad del Sagrado Corazón, Puerto Rico
    Latino Barometro, MORI Chile
    Equipos Consultores, Montevideo, Uruguay
    Social Science Research Institute, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
    University of Vienna, Austria
    University of Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Center for Economic and Social Studies (CESS), Tirana, Albania
    Voices Research and Consultancy S.A., Argentina
    Faculty of Political Sciences and Sociology, Deusto University, Bilbao, Spain
    Laboratory for Comparative Social Research, Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia
    Gallup Pakistan
    Department of Sociology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy
    Research institute for Quality of Life, Romanian Academy of Science, Bucharest, Romania
    University of Michigan, USA
    SORGU, Baku, Azerbaijan
    Department of Sociology and Political Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
    Department of Government, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Institute of Sociology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
    Institute of Philosophy, Sociology and Law, Armenian National Academy of Sciences, Yerevan, Armenia
    Institute for Future Studies, Sweden
    Institute for Sociology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
    Research Centre SHARQ /Oriens, Tajikistan
    Authors
    Gedeshi, Ilir; Rotman, David; Pachulia, Merab; Poghosyan, Gevorg; Kritzinger, Sylvia; Fotev, Georgy; Kolenović-Đapo, Jadranka; Baloban, Josip; Baloban, Stjepan; Rabušic, Ladislav; Frederiksen, Morten; Saar, Erki; Ketola, Kimmo; Pachulia, Merab; Wolf, Christof; Bréchon, Pierre; Voas, David; Rosta, Gergely; Rovati, Giancarlo; Jónsdóttir, Guðbjörg A.; Petkovska, Antoanela; Ziliukaite, Ruta; Reeskens, Tim; Jenssen, Anders T.; Komar, Olivera; Voicu, Bogdan; Soboleva, Natalia; Marody, Mirosława; Bešić, Miloš; Strapcová, Katarina; Uhan, Samo; Silvestre Cabrera, María; Wallman-Lundåsen, Susanne; Ernst Stähli, Michèle; Ramos, Alice; Micó Ibáñez, Joan; Carballo, Marita; McAllister, Ian; Foa, Roberto Stefan (PI Bangladesh); Moreno Morales, Daniel E.; de Oliveira de Castro, Henrique Carlos; Lagos, Marta; Zhong, Yang; Casas, Andres (PI Colombia); Yesilada, Birol (PI Cyprus); Paez, Cristina; Abdel Latif, Abdel Hamid; Jennings, Will (PI Ethiopia); Welzel, Christian; Koniordos. Sokratis; Díaz Argueta, Julio César; Cheng, Edmund; Gravelle, Timothy (PI Indonesia); Stoker, Gerry; Dagher, Munqith; Yamazaki, Seiko; Braizat, Fares; Rakisheva, Botagoz; Bakaloff, Yuri; Haerpfer, Christian (PI Lebanon); Wing-yat Yu, Eilo; Lee, Grace; Moreno, Alejandro; Souvanlasy, Chansada; Perry, Paul; Denton, Carlos (PI Nicaragua); Puranen, Bi (PI Nigeria); Gilani, Bilal; Romero, Catalina; Guerrero, Linda; Hernández Acosta, Javier J.; Voicu, Bogdan; Zavadskaya, Margarita; Veskovic, Nino; Auh, Soo Young; Tsai, Ming-Chang; Olimov, Muzaffar; Bureekul, Thawilwadee; Ben Hafaiedh, Abdelwahab; Esmer, Yilmaz; Inglehart, Ronald; Depouilly, Xavier; Norris, Pippa (PI Zimbabwe); Balakireva, Olga; Lachapelle, Guy; Mathews, Mathew; Mieriņa, Inta; Manasyan, Heghine; Ekstroem, Anna M. (PI Kenya); Swehli, Nedal; Riyaz, Aminath; Tseveen, Tsetsenbileg; Abderebbi, Mhammed; Verhoeven, Piet; Briceno-Leon, Roberto; Moravec, Vaclav; Duffy, Bobby; Stoneman, Paul; Kosnac, Pavol; Zuasnabar, Ignacio; Kumar, Sanjay; Uzbekistan: not specified for security reasons
    Time period covered
    Jan 18, 2017 - Jul 2, 2023
    Area covered
    France
    Measurement technique
    Face-to-face interview: Computer-assisted (CAPI/CAMI), Face-to-face interview: Paper-and-pencil (PAPI), Telephone interview: Computer-assisted (CATI), Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based (CAWI), Self-administered questionnaire: Paper, Web-based interview, EVS 2017:Mode of collection: mixed modeFace-to-face interview: CAPI (Computer Assisted Personal Interview)Face-to-face interview: PAPI (Paper and Pencil Interview)Telephone interview: CATI (Computer Assisted Telephone Interview) Self-administered questionnaire: CAWI (Computer-Assisted Web Interview)Self-administered questionnaire: PaperIn all countries, fieldwork was conducted on the basis of detailed and uniform instructions prepared by the EVS advisory groups. The main mode in EVS 2017 is face to face (interviewer-administered). An alternative self-administered form was possible but as a parallel mixed mode, i.e. there was no choice for the respondent between modes: either s/he was assigned to face to face, either s/he was assigned to web or web/mail format. In all countries included in the first pre-release, the EVS questionnaire was administered as face-to-face interview (CAPI or/and PAPI).The EVS 2017 Master Questionnaire was provided in English and each national Programme Director had to ensure that the questionnaire was translated into all the languages spoken by 5% or more of the population in the country. A central team monitored the translation process by means of the Translation Management Tool (TMT), developed by CentERdata (Tilburg).WVS wave 7:Mode of collection: mixed modeFace-to-face interview: CAPI (Computer Assisted Personal Interview)Face-to-face interview: PAPI (Paper and Pencil Interview)Telephone interview: CATI (Computer Assisted Telephone Interview)Self-administered questionnaire: CAWI (Computer-Assisted Web Interview)Self-administered questionnaire: PaperWeb-based interviewIn all countries, fieldwork was conducted on the basis of detailed and uniform instructions prepared by the WVS scientific advisory committee and WVSA secretariat. The main data collection mode in WVS 2017-2022 is face to face (interviewer-administered) with a printed (PAPI) or electronic (CAPI) questionnaire. Several countries employed self-administered interview or mixed-mode approach to data collection: Australia (CAWI; postal survey); Canada (CAWI); Great Britain (CAPI; CAWI; postal survey; web-based interview (Video interviewing); Hong Kong SAR (PAPI; CAWI); Malaysia (CAWI; PAPI); Netherlands (CAWI); Northern Ireland (CAPI; CAWI; postal survey; web-based interview (Video interviewing); USA (CAWI; CATI).The WVS Master Questionnaire was provided in English, Arabic, Russian and Spanish. Each national survey team had to ensure that the questionnaire was translated into all the languages spoken by 15% or more of the population in the country. WVSA Secretariat and Data archive monitored the translation process; every translation is subject to multi-stage validation procedure before the fieldwork can be started.
    Description

    The European Values Study (EVS) and the World Values Survey (WVS) are two large-scale, cross-national and longitudinal survey research programmes. They include a large number of questions on moral, religious, social, political, occupational and family values which have been replicated since the early eighties.

    Both organizations agreed to cooperate in joint data collection from 2017. EVS has been responsible for planning and conducting surveys in European countries, using the EVS questionnaire and EVS methodological guidelines. WVSA has been responsible for planning and conducting surveys in countries in the world outside Europe, using the WVS questionnaire and WVS methodological guidelines. Both organisations developed their draft master questionnaires independently. The joint items define the Common Core of both questionnaires.

    The Joint EVS/WVS is constructed from the two EVS and WVS source datasets: - European Values Study 2017 Integrated Dataset (EVS 2017), ZA7500 Data file Version 5.0.0, doi:10.4232/1.13897 (https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13897). Haerpfer, C., Inglehart, R., Moreno,A., Welzel,C., Kizilova,K., Diez-Medrano J., M. Lagos, P. Norris, E. Ponarin & B. Puranen et al. (eds.). 2024. World Values Survey: Round Seven–Country-Pooled Datafile. Madrid, Spain & Vienna, Austria: JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat. Version. 6.0.0, doi:10.14281/18241.24.
    1. Perceptions of life: importance of family, friends, leisure time, politics, work, and religion; feeling of happiness; self-assessment of state of health; satisfaction with life; internal or external control; importance of educational goals: desirable qualities of children; membership in voluntary organisations (religious organisations, cultural activities, trade unions, political parties or groups, conservation, environment, ecology, animal rights, professional associations, sports, recreation, consumer groups, or other groups); membership in humanitarian or charitable organisation, self-help group or mutual aid; tolerance towards minorities (people of a different race, heavy drinkers, immigrants/ foreign workers, drug addicts, homosexuals - social distance); trust in people; protecting the environment vs. economic growth.

    1. Work: attitude towards work (people who don’t work turn lazy, work is a duty towards society, work always comes first); job scarce: men should have more right to a job than women (3-point scale and 5-point scale), employers should give priority to (nation) people than immigrants (3-point scale and 5-point scale).

    2. Religion and morale: religious denomination; current frequency of religious services attendance; frequency of prayer (WVS7); pray to God outside of religious services (EVS5); self-assessment of religiousness; belief in God, life after death, hell, and heaven; importance of God in one´s life; morale attitudes (scale: claiming government benefits without entitlement, avoiding a fare on public transport, cheating on taxes, accepting a bribe, homosexuality, prostitution, abortion, divorce, euthanasia, suicide, having casual sex, political violence, death penalty).

    3. Family: attitude towards traditional understanding of one´s role of man and woman in occupation and family (gender roles); homosexual couples are as good parents as other couples; duty towards society to have children; it is child´s duty to take care of ill parent; one of main goals in life has been to make own parents proud.

    4. Politics and society: most important aims of the country for the next ten years (first choice, second choice), aims of the respondent (first choice, second choice)); post-materialist index 4-item; willingness to fight for the country; expectation of future development (less importance placed on work and greater respect for authority); political interest; political participation (political action: signing a petition, joining in boycotts, attending lawful/ peaceful demonstrations, joining unofficial strikes); self positioning in political scale; equal incomes vs. incentives for individual effort; private vs. state ownership of business and industry; individual vs. government responsibility for providing; competition good vs. harmful for people; confidence in institutions (churches, armed forces, the press, labour unions, the police, parliament, the civil services, major regional organisations (combined from country-specific), the European Union, the government, the political parties, major companies, the environmental protection movement, justice system/ courts, the United Nations); satisfaction with the political system in the country; preferred type of political system (strong leader, expert decisions, army should rule the country, or democracy); party the respondent would vote for: first choice (WVS); political party with the most appeal (ISO 3166-1) (EVS5); essential characteristics of democracy; importance of democracy for the respondent; rating democracy in own country; vote in elections on local level and on...

  3. c

    European Values Study 2017: Integrated Dataset (EVS 2017) - Matrix Design...

    • datacatalogue.cessda.eu
    • search.gesis.org
    • +3more
    Updated Mar 15, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Wolf, Christof; Jónsdóttir, Guðbjörg A.; Reeskens, Tim; Ernst Stähli, Michèle (2023). European Values Study 2017: Integrated Dataset (EVS 2017) - Matrix Design Data [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.4232/1.13561
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 15, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Social Science Research Insitute, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland
    Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
    GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim, Germany
    Department of Sociology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands
    Authors
    Wolf, Christof; Jónsdóttir, Guðbjörg A.; Reeskens, Tim; Ernst Stähli, Michèle
    Time period covered
    Jun 2017 - Nov 2018
    Area covered
    Island, Niederlande, Deutschland, Schweiz
    Measurement technique
    Selbstausgefüllter Fragebogen: Webbasiert (CAWI), Selbstausgefüllter Fragebogen: Papier
    Description

    Die European Values Study ist ein groß angelegtes, länderübergreifendes und längsschnittliches Umfrage-Forschungsprogramm zu der Frage, wie Europäer über Familie, Arbeit, Religion, Politik und Gesellschaft denken. Die Umfrage wird alle neun Jahre in einer wachsenden Zahl von Ländern wiederholt und bietet Einblicke in die Ideen, Überzeugungen, Präferenzen, Einstellungen, Werte und Meinungen der Bürger in ganz Europa.

    Wie die vorhergehenden Erhebungen in den Jahren 1981, 1990, 1999 und 2008 konzentriert sich auch die fünfte EVS-Welle weiterhin auf ein breites Spektrum von Werten. Die Fragen sind zwischen den Wellen und Regionen in hohem Maße vergleichbar, so dass sich der EVS für Forschungsarbeiten zur Untersuchung von Trends im Zeitverlauf eignet.

    Mit der neuen Welle wurden die methodischen Standards gestärkt. Das full release des EVS 2017 enthält Daten und Dokumentationen von insgesamt 37 teilnehmenden Ländern. Weitere Informationen finden Sie auf der Website des EVS.

    Moralische, religiöse, gesellschaftliche, politische, berufliche und familiäre Werte der Europäer.

    Themen: 1. Wahrnehmungen des Lebens: Bedeutung von Arbeit, Familie, Freunden und Bekannten, Freizeit, Politik und Religion; Glück; Selbsteinschätzung der eigenen Gesundheit; Mitgliedschaften in Freiwilligenorganisationen (religiöse oder kirchliche Organisationen, kulturelle Aktivitäten, Gewerkschaften, politische Parteien oder Gruppen, Umwelt, Ökologie, Tierrechte, Berufsverbände, Sport, Freizeit oder andere Gruppen, keine); aktive oder inaktive Mitgliedschaft in humanitären oder karitativen Organisationen, Verbraucherorganisationen, Selbsthilfegruppen oder gegenseitige Unterstützung; Freiwilligenarbeit in den letzten sechs Monaten; Toleranz gegenüber Minderheiten (Menschen anderer Rassen, starke Trinker, Einwanderer, Ausländer, Drogenabhängige, Homosexuelle, Christen, Muslime, Juden und Zigeuner - soziale Distanz); Vertrauen in Menschen; Einschätzung von fairem und hilfsbereitem Verhalten; interne oder externe Kontrolle; Lebenszufriedenheit; Bedeutung von Bildungszielen: wünschenswerte Eigenschaften von Kindern.

    1. Arbeit: Einstellung zur Arbeit (Arbeit wird zur Entwicklung von Talenten benötigt, Geld ohne Arbeit zu erhalten, ist demütigend, Menschen werden faul, wenn sie nicht arbeiten, Arbeit ist eine Pflicht gegenüber der Gesellschaft, Arbeit steht immer an erster Stelle); Bedeutung ausgewählter Aspekte der beruflichen Arbeit; Vorrang von Einheimischen vor Ausländern sowie Männern vor Frauen im Job.

    2. Religion und Moral: Religionsgemeinschaft; aktuelle und ehemalige Religionsgemeinschaft; Kirchgangshäufigkeit derzeit und im Alter von 12 Jahren; Selbsteinschätzung der Religiosität; Glaube an Gott, Leben nach dem Tod, Hölle, Himmel und Wiedergeburt; persönlicher Gott vs. Geist oder Lebenskraft; Bedeutung Gottes im eigenen Leben (10-Punkte-Skala); Häufigkeit von Gebeten; Moralvorstellungen (Skala: Inanspruchnahme von staatlichen Leistungen ohne Anspruch, Steuerbetrug, Einnahme von weichen Drogen, Annehmen von Bestechungsgeldern, Homosexualität, Abtreibung, Scheidung, Euthanasie, Selbstmord, Barzahlung zur Vermeidung von Steuern, Gelegenheitssex, Schwarzfahren im öffentlichen Verkehr, Prostitution, In-vitro-Fertilisation, politische Gewalt, Todesstrafe).

    3. Familie: Vertrauen in die Familie; wichtigste Kriterien für eine erfolgreiche Ehe oder Partnerschaft (Treue, angemessenes Einkommen, gutes Wohnen, Aufteilung der Haushaltsarbeit, Kinder, Zeit für Freunde und persönliche Hobbys); Ehe ist eine veraltete Institution; Einstellung zum traditionellen Verständnis der Rolle von Mann und Frau in Beruf und Familie (Geschlechterrollen); homosexuelle Paare sind ebenso gute Eltern wie andere Paare; Verpflichtung gegenüber der Gesellschaft, Kinder zu bekommen; Verantwortung von erwachsenen Kindern für ihre Eltern, wenn sie langfristig betreut werden müssen; Hauptziel im Leben die eigenen Eltern stolz zu machen.

    4. Politik und Gesellschaft: Politikinteresse; politische Partizipation; Präferenz für individuelle Freiheit oder soziale Gleichheit; Selbsteinschätzung auf einem Links-rechts Kontinuum (10-Punkte-Skala); individuelle vs. staatliche Verantwortung für die Bereitstellung; Übernahme jedes Jobs vs. Recht auf Ablehnung eines Jobs durch Arbeitslose; Wettbewerb gut vs. schädlich für Menschen; gleiche Einkommen vs. Anreize für individuelle Anstrengungen; privates vs. Staatseigentum von Wirtschaft und Industrie; Postmaterialismus (Skala); wichtigste Ziele des Landes für die nächsten zehn Jahre; Bereitschaft, für das Land zu kämpfen; Erwartung der zukünftigen Entwicklung (weniger Bedeutung der Arbeit und größere Achtung der Autorität); Institutionenvertrauen; wesentliche Merkmale der Demokratie; Bedeutung der Demokratie für den Befragten; Bewertung der Demokratie im eigenen Land; Zufriedenheit mit dem politischen System im Land; bevorzugte Art des politischen Systems (starker Führer, Expertenentscheidungen, Armee sollte das Land regieren, oder...

  4. c

    European Values Study 2017: Ukraine (EVS 2017)

    • datacatalogue.cessda.eu
    • search.gesis.org
    • +1more
    Updated Mar 15, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Balakireva, Olga (2023). European Values Study 2017: Ukraine (EVS 2017) [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.4232/1.13714
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 15, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Institute Economy and Prognoses, National Academy of Ukraine, Department of Monitoring Research of the Social and Economic Process, Kiev, Ukraine
    Authors
    Balakireva, Olga
    Time period covered
    Nov 2, 2020 - Nov 23, 2020
    Area covered
    Ukraine
    Measurement technique
    Persönliches Interview : Papier-und-Bleistift (PAPI)
    Description

    Die European Values Study ist ein groß angelegtes, länderübergreifendes und längsschnittliches Umfrage-Forschungsprogramm zu der Frage, wie Europäer über Familie, Arbeit, Religion, Politik und Gesellschaft denken. Die Umfrage wird alle neun Jahre in einer wachsenden Zahl von Ländern wiederholt und bietet Einblicke in die Ideen, Überzeugungen, Präferenzen, Einstellungen, Werte und Meinungen der Bürger in ganz Europa.

    Wie die vorhergehenden Erhebungen in den Jahren 1981, 1990, 1999 und 2008 konzentriert sich auch die fünfte EVS-Welle weiterhin auf ein breites Spektrum von Werten. Die Fragen sind zwischen den Wellen und Regionen in hohem Maße vergleichbar, so dass sich der EVS für Forschungsarbeiten zur Untersuchung von Trends im Zeitverlauf eignet.

    Der ukrainische EVS 2017-Datensatz folgt allen EVS-Standards hinsichtlich Methodik und Datenqualität. Er ist bereits in das EVS Trend File 1981-2017 integriert; und wird in einem zukünftigen Update in den EVS 2017 Integrated Dataset integriert werden. In der Zwischenzeit kann er einfach mit dem EVS 2017 Integrated Dataset (EVS 2017) zusammengeführt werden.
    1. Wahrnehmungen des Lebens: Bedeutung von Arbeit, Familie, Freunden und Bekannten, Freizeit, Politik und Religion; Glück; Selbsteinschätzung der eigenen Gesundheit; Mitgliedschaften in Freiwilligenorganisationen (religiöse oder kirchliche Organisationen, kulturelle Aktivitäten, Gewerkschaften, politische Parteien oder Gruppen, Umwelt, Ökologie, Tierrechte, Berufsverbände, Sport, Freizeit oder andere Gruppen, keine); aktive oder inaktive Mitgliedschaft in humanitären oder karitativen Organisationen, Verbraucherorganisationen, Selbsthilfegruppen oder gegenseitige Unterstützung; Freiwilligenarbeit in den letzten sechs Monaten; Toleranz gegenüber Minderheiten (Menschen anderer Rassen, starke Trinker, Einwanderer, Ausländer, Drogenabhängige, Homosexuelle, Christen, Muslime, Juden und Zigeuner - soziale Distanz); Vertrauen in Menschen; Einschätzung von fairem und hilfsbereitem Verhalten; interne oder externe Kontrolle; Lebenszufriedenheit; Bedeutung von Bildungszielen: wünschenswerte Eigenschaften von Kindern.

    1. Arbeit: Einstellung zur Arbeit (Arbeit wird zur Entwicklung von Talenten benötigt, Geld ohne Arbeit zu erhalten, ist demütigend, Menschen werden faul, wenn sie nicht arbeiten, Arbeit ist eine Pflicht gegenüber der Gesellschaft, Arbeit steht immer an erster Stelle); Bedeutung ausgewählter Aspekte der beruflichen Arbeit; Vorrang von Einheimischen vor Ausländern sowie Männern vor Frauen im Job.

    2. Religion und Moral: Religionsgemeinschaft; aktuelle und ehemalige Religionsgemeinschaft; Kirchgangshäufigkeit derzeit und im Alter von 12 Jahren; Selbsteinschätzung der Religiosität; Glaube an Gott, Leben nach dem Tod, Hölle, Himmel und Wiedergeburt; persönlicher Gott vs. Geist oder Lebenskraft; Bedeutung Gottes im eigenen Leben (10-Punkte-Skala); Häufigkeit von Gebeten; Moralvorstellungen (Skala: Inanspruchnahme von staatlichen Leistungen ohne Anspruch, Steuerbetrug, Einnahme von weichen Drogen, Annehmen von Bestechungsgeldern, Homosexualität, Abtreibung, Scheidung, Sterbehilfe, Selbstmord, Barzahlung zur Vermeidung von Steuern, Gelegenheitssex, Schwarzfahren im öffentlichen Verkehr, Prostitution, In-vitro-Fertilisation, politische Gewalt, Todesstrafe).

    3. Familie: Vertrauen in die Familie; wichtigste Kriterien für eine erfolgreiche Ehe oder Partnerschaft (Treue, angemessenes Einkommen, gutes Wohnen, Aufteilung der Haushaltsarbeit, Kinder, Zeit für Freunde und persönliche Hobbys); Ehe ist eine veraltete Institution; Einstellung zum traditionellen Verständnis der Rolle von Mann und Frau in Beruf und Familie (Geschlechterrollen); homosexuelle Paare sind ebenso gute Eltern wie andere Paare; Verpflichtung gegenüber der Gesellschaft, Kinder zu bekommen; Verantwortung von erwachsenen Kindern für ihre Eltern, wenn sie langfristig betreut werden müssen; Hauptziel im Leben die eigenen Eltern stolz zu machen.

    4. Politik und Gesellschaft: Politikinteresse; politische Partizipation; Präferenz für individuelle Freiheit oder soziale Gleichheit; Selbsteinschätzung auf einem Links-rechts Kontinuum (10-Punkte-Skala); individuelle vs. staatliche Verantwortung für die Bereitstellung; Übernahme jedes Jobs vs. Recht auf Ablehnung eines Jobs durch Arbeitslose; Wettbewerb gut vs. schädlich für Menschen; gleiche Einkommen vs. Anreize für individuelle Anstrengungen; privates vs. Staatseigentum von Wirtschaft und Industrie; Postmaterialismus (Skala); wichtigste Ziele des Landes für die nächsten zehn Jahre; Bereitschaft, für das Land zu kämpfen; Erwartung der zukünftigen Entwicklung (weniger Bedeutung der Arbeit und größere Achtung der Autorität); Institutionenvertrauen; wesentliche Merkmale der Demokratie; Bedeutung der Demokratie für den Befragten; Bewertung der Demokratie im eigenen Land; Zufriedenheit mit dem politischen System im Land; bevorzugte Art des politischen Systems (starker Führer, Expertenentscheidungen, Armee sollte...

  5. d

    European Values Study 2017: Integrated Dataset (EVS 2017) - Sensitive Data

    • da-ra.de
    Updated Oct 20, 2020
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    EVS (2020). European Values Study 2017: Integrated Dataset (EVS 2017) - Sensitive Data [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.4232/1.13091
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 20, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    GESIS Data Archive
    da|ra
    Authors
    EVS
    Time period covered
    Jun 19, 2017 - Apr 4, 2018
    Description

    Auswahlverfahren Kommentar: Die Auswahlverfahren unterscheiden sich je nach Land: Wahrscheinlichkeitsauswahl: Mehrstufige Zufallsauswahl Wahrscheinlichkeitsauswahl: Einfache Zufallsauswahl

    Für die EVS 2017 wurde eine repräsentative ein- oder mehrstufige Stichprobe der erwachsenen Bevölkerung des Landes ab 18 Jahren verwendet. Der Stichprobenumfang wurde als effektiver Stichprobenumfang festgelegt: 1200 für Länder mit mehr als 2 Millionen Einwohnern, 1000 für Länder mit weniger als 2 Millionen Einwohnern. 8 von 16 Ländern wichen von den Richtlinien ab und planten mit einem effektiven Stichprobenumfang unterhalb des festgelegten Schwellenwerts. Deutschland, Niederlande, Island und die Schweiz haben aufgrund des Mixed Mode Designs nur einen Teil (50% oder mehr) des effektiven Stichprobenumfangs dem vom Interviewer verwalteten Modus zugewiesen.

    Das Stichprobendesign und andere relevante Informationen über die Stichproben wurden von der EVS-Methodikgruppe (EVS-MG) überprüft und vor der Beauftragung eines Erhebungsinstituts oder dem Beginn der Datenerhebung genehmigt. Im Falle von On-Field-Stichproben hat EVS-MG die notwendigen Protokolle zur Dokumentation der Auswahlwahrscheinlichkeiten der einzelnen Befragten vorgeschlagen.

    Die Stichproben wurden mit dem von den nationalen Gruppen übergebenen Sampling Design Form (SDF) dokumentiert (siehe EVS2017 Methodological Guidelines, Sampling). Das SDF enthält die Beschreibung des Stichprobenrahmens und jeder Stichprobenstufe sowie die Berechnung des geplanten Brutto- und Nettostichprobenumfangs, um die erforderliche effektive Stichprobe zu erreichen. Darüber hinaus enthält es die analytische Beschreibung der Auswahlwahrscheinlichkeiten des Stichprobendesigns, die zur Berechnung von Designgewichten verwendet werden.

  6. EVS Trend File 1981-2017 – Sensitive Dataset

    • datacatalogue.cessda.eu
    • search.gesis.org
    • +2more
    Updated Mar 15, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Gedeshi, Ilir; Zulehner, Paul M.; Rotman, David; Titarenko, Larissa; Billiet, Jaak; Dobbelaere, Karel; Kerkhofs, Jan; Swyngedouw, Marc; Voyé, Liliane; Fotev, Georgy; Marinov, Mario; Raichev, Andrei; Stoychev, Kancho; Kielty, J.F.; Nevitte, Neil; Baloban, Stjepan; Baloban, Josip; Roudometof, Victor; Rabusic, Ladislav; Rehak, Jan; Gundelach, Peter; Petersen, E.; Riis, Ole; Röhme, Nils; Saar, Andrus; Lotti, Leila; Pehkonen, Juhani; Puranen, Bi; Riffault, Hélène; Stoetzel, Jean; Tchernia, Jean-François; Pachulia, Merab; Jagodzinski, Wolfgang; Klingemann, Hans-Dieter; Köcher, Renate; Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth; Anheier, Helmut; Barker, David; Harding, Stephen; Heald, Gordon; Timms, Noel; Voas, David; Gari, Aikaterini; Georgas, James; Mylonas, Kostas; Hankiss, Elemer; Manchin, Robert; Rosta, Gergely; Tomka, Miklós; Haraldsson, Olafur; Jónsson, Fridrik H.; Olafsson, Stefan; Breen, Michael; Fahey, Tony; Fogarty, Michael; Kennedy, Kieran; Sinnott, Richard; Whelan, Chris; Abbruzzese, Salvatore; Calvaruso, Claudio; Gubert, Renzo; Rovati, Giancarlo; Zepa, Brigita; Alisauskiene, Rasa; Juknevicius, Stanislovas; Ziliukaite, Ruta; Estgen, Pol; Hausman, Pierre; Legrand, Michel; Petkovska, Antoanela; Abela, Anthony M.; Cachia-Caruana, Richard; Inganuez, Fr. Joe; Troisi, Joseph; Petruti, Doru; Besic, Milos; Arts, Wil A.; de Moor, Ruud; European Values Study; Hagenaars, Jacques A.P.; Halman, Loek; Luijkx, Ruud; Hayes, Bernadette C.; Smith, Alan; Listhaug, Ola; Jasinska-Kania, Aleksandra; Konieczna, Joanna; Marody, Mira; Cabral, Manuel Villaverde; Franca, Luis de; Ramos, Alice; Vala, Jorge; Pop, Lucien; Voicu, Malina; Zamfir, Catalin; Bashkirova, Elena; Gredelj, Stjepan; Kusá, Zuzana; Malnar, Brina; Tos, Niko; Elzo, Javier; Orizo, Francisco Andrés; Silvestre Cabrera, María; Bush, Karin; Wallman-Lundåsen, Susanne; Pettersson, Thorleif; Joye, Dominique; Esmer, Yilmaz; Balakireva, Olga; Inglehart, Ronald; Rosenberg, Florence; Sullivan, Edward; Pachulia, Merab; Poghosyan, Gevorg; Kritzinger, Sylvia; Kolenović-Đapo, Jadranka; Baloban, Josip; Frederiksen, Morten; Saar, Erki; Ketola, Kimmo; Wolf, Christof; Pachulia, Merab; Bréchon, Pierre; Jónsdóttir, Guðbjörg A.; Komar, Olivera; Reeskens, Tim; Jenssen, Anders T.; Soboleva, Natalia; Voicu, Bogdan; Strapcová, Katarina; Bešić, Miloš; Uhan, Samo; Ernst Stähli, Michèle; Mieriņa, Inta (2023). EVS Trend File 1981-2017 – Sensitive Dataset [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.4232/1.14022
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 15, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Gallup, Inc.http://gallup.com/
    Lithuanian Institute of Culture and Arts, Lithuania
    University of Deusto, Spain
    The Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Ireland
    BBSS Gallup International, Bulgaria
    GORBI (Georgian Opinion Research Business International), Tbilisi, Georgia
    Department of Social Sciences, GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim, Germany
    Saar Poll, Tallinn, Estonia
    University of Trondheim; Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
    Institut d’études politiques de Grenoble, Grenoble, France
    Belarus State University, Belarus
    Department of Sociology, Vilnius University, Lithuania
    Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Republic of Macedonia
    Aarhus University, Denmark
    SIFO, Sweden
    Swiss Foundation for Research in Social Sciences (FORS), University of Lausanne, Switzerland
    DATA S.A.; Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, Spain
    FORS, Swiss Foundation for Research in Social Sciences, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
    Department of Social Science, University College London, Great Britain
    Faculty for Social Wellbeing, New Bulgarian University, Sofia, Bulgaria
    Czech Republic
    University of Montenegro, Republic of Montenegro
    Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
    Statistics Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
    University of Athens, Greece
    University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
    University of Iceland, Iceland
    Slovak Academy of Sciences, Slovak Republic
    Department of Social Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden
    University of Cyprus, Cyprus
    Department of Sociology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands
    University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
    Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Hungary
    Baltic Institute of Social Sciences, Latvia
    Georgian Opinion Research Business International (GORBI), Georgia
    University of Malta, Malta
    London School of Economics and Political Science, Great Britain
    Institute for Social Research, Lithuania
    Masaryk University, Czech Republic
    Institut für Demoskopie Allensbach, Germany
    Faits et Opinions, France
    Uppsala University, Sweden
    University of Zagreb, Croatia
    Tilburg University, The Netherlands
    Hungarian Religious Research Centre, Hungary
    University of Trento, Italy
    Institute Economy and Prognoses, National Academy of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine
    Romanian Academy, Romania
    Malta
    SeSoPI Centre Intercommunautaire, Luxembourg
    University of Lisbon, Portugal
    University of Leicester, Great Britain
    Faculty of Social Sciences, Public Opinion and Mass Communication Research, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
    SAAR POLL, Estonia
    Center for Economic and Social Studies (CESS), Albania
    Institute of Marketing and Polls IMAS-INC, Republic of Moldova
    Faculty of Philosophy, University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
    De Facto Consultancy, Podgorica, Montenegro
    Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium
    Catholic Faculty of Theology, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
    University of Copenhagen, Denmark
    ISR, Great Britain
    Bashkirova & Partners, Russian Federation
    Berlin Science Center for Social Research, Germany
    Kirkon tutkimuskeskus, Tampere, Finland
    Bogazici University; Bahcesehir University, Turkey
    University of Belgrade, Serbia
    (Armenia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Northern Cyprus)
    University of Calgary, Canada
    Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Bulgaria
    TNS Gallup Oy, Finland
    Faculty of Political Sciences, University of Belgrade, Serbia
    Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate (CARA), USA
    Social Science Research Institute, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
    University of Vienna, Austria
    Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Hungary
    Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Italy
    CEPS/INSTEAD, Luxembourg
    University of Ulster, Northern Ireland
    Laboratory for Comparative Social Research, Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia
    Great Britain
    Tchernia Etudes Conseil, France
    Research institute for Quality of Life, Romanian Academy of Science, Bucharest, Romania
    Theseus International Management Institute, France
    University of Michigan, USA
    SORGU, Baku, Azerbaijan
    Department of Sociology and Political Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
    Department of Government, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Queen´s University Belfast, Northern Ireland
    University of Limerick, Ireland
    Institute of Philosophy, Sociology and Law, Armenian National Academy of Sciences, Yerevan, Armenia
    University of Warsaw, Poland
    University of Cologne, Germany
    Institute for Sociology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
    Authors
    Gedeshi, Ilir; Zulehner, Paul M.; Rotman, David; Titarenko, Larissa; Billiet, Jaak; Dobbelaere, Karel; Kerkhofs, Jan; Swyngedouw, Marc; Voyé, Liliane; Fotev, Georgy; Marinov, Mario; Raichev, Andrei; Stoychev, Kancho; Kielty, J.F.; Nevitte, Neil; Baloban, Stjepan; Baloban, Josip; Roudometof, Victor; Rabusic, Ladislav; Rehak, Jan; Gundelach, Peter; Petersen, E.; Riis, Ole; Röhme, Nils; Saar, Andrus; Lotti, Leila; Pehkonen, Juhani; Puranen, Bi; Riffault, Hélène; Stoetzel, Jean; Tchernia, Jean-François; Pachulia, Merab; Jagodzinski, Wolfgang; Klingemann, Hans-Dieter; Köcher, Renate; Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth; Anheier, Helmut; Barker, David; Harding, Stephen; Heald, Gordon; Timms, Noel; Voas, David; Gari, Aikaterini; Georgas, James; Mylonas, Kostas; Hankiss, Elemer; Manchin, Robert; Rosta, Gergely; Tomka, Miklós; Haraldsson, Olafur; Jónsson, Fridrik H.; Olafsson, Stefan; Breen, Michael; Fahey, Tony; Fogarty, Michael; Kennedy, Kieran; Sinnott, Richard; Whelan, Chris; Abbruzzese, Salvatore; Calvaruso, Claudio; Gubert, Renzo; Rovati, Giancarlo; Zepa, Brigita; Alisauskiene, Rasa; Juknevicius, Stanislovas; Ziliukaite, Ruta; Estgen, Pol; Hausman, Pierre; Legrand, Michel; Petkovska, Antoanela; Abela, Anthony M.; Cachia-Caruana, Richard; Inganuez, Fr. Joe; Troisi, Joseph; Petruti, Doru; Besic, Milos; Arts, Wil A.; de Moor, Ruud; European Values Study; Hagenaars, Jacques A.P.; Halman, Loek; Luijkx, Ruud; Hayes, Bernadette C.; Smith, Alan; Listhaug, Ola; Jasinska-Kania, Aleksandra; Konieczna, Joanna; Marody, Mira; Cabral, Manuel Villaverde; Franca, Luis de; Ramos, Alice; Vala, Jorge; Pop, Lucien; Voicu, Malina; Zamfir, Catalin; Bashkirova, Elena; Gredelj, Stjepan; Kusá, Zuzana; Malnar, Brina; Tos, Niko; Elzo, Javier; Orizo, Francisco Andrés; Silvestre Cabrera, María; Bush, Karin; Wallman-Lundåsen, Susanne; Pettersson, Thorleif; Joye, Dominique; Esmer, Yilmaz; Balakireva, Olga; Inglehart, Ronald; Rosenberg, Florence; Sullivan, Edward; Pachulia, Merab; Poghosyan, Gevorg; Kritzinger, Sylvia; Kolenović-Đapo, Jadranka; Baloban, Josip; Frederiksen, Morten; Saar, Erki; Ketola, Kimmo; Wolf, Christof; Pachulia, Merab; Bréchon, Pierre; Jónsdóttir, Guðbjörg A.; Komar, Olivera; Reeskens, Tim; Jenssen, Anders T.; Soboleva, Natalia; Voicu, Bogdan; Strapcová, Katarina; Bešić, Miloš; Uhan, Samo; Ernst Stähli, Michèle; Mieriņa, Inta
    Time period covered
    Mar 1, 1981 - Oct 1, 2021
    Area covered
    Bulgaria, Hungary, France
    Measurement technique
    Face-to-face interview: Computer-assisted (CAPI/CAMI), Face-to-face interview: Paper-and-pencil (PAPI), Self-administered questionnaire: Paper, Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based (CAWI), Telephone interview: Computer-assisted (CATI), Mode of collection: mixed modeFace-to-face interview: CAPI (Computer Assisted Personal Interview)Face-to-face interview: PAPI (Paper and Pencil Interview)Telephone interview: CATI (Computer Assisted Telephone Interview)Self-administered questionnaire: CAWI (Computer-Assisted Web Interview)Self-administered questionnaire: PaperEVS 2017: In all countries, fieldwork was conducted on the basis of detailed and uniform instructions prepared by the EVS advisory groups. The main mode in EVS 2017 is face to face (interviewer-administered). An alternative self-administered form was possible but as a parallel mixed mode, i.e. there was no choice for the respondent between modes: either s/he was assigned to face to face, either s/he was assigned to web or web/mail format. In all countries included in the first pre-release, the EVS questionnaire was administered as face-to-face interview (CAPI or/and PAPI).The EVS 2017 Master Questionnaire was provided in English and each national Programme Director had to ensure that the questionnaire was translated into all the languages spoken by 5% or more of the population in the country. A central team monitored the translation process by means of the Translation Management Tool (TMT), developed by CentERdata (Tilburg).EVS 2008: Face-to-face interviews with standardized questionnaire. In all countries, fieldwork was conducted on the basis of detailed and uniform instructions prepared by the EVS advisory groups. The EVS questionnaires were administered as face-to-face interviews in the appropriate national language(s). As far as the data capture is concerned, CAPI or PAPI was used in nearly all countries. Exceptions are Finland (internet panel) and Sweden (postal survey). The English basic questionnaire was translated into other languages by means of the questionnaire translation system WebTrans, a web-based translation platform designed by Gallup Europe. The whole translation process was closely monitored and quasi-automated documented (see EVS (2010): EVS 2008 Guidelines and Recommendations. GESIS-Technical Reports 2010/16. Retrieved from <a href=http://www.europeanvaluesstudy.eu/ target=_blank> EVS webpage </a>.EVS 1999: Face-to-face interviews with standardized questionnaire. In Iceland about a quarter of the respondents were interviewed by telephone. These were respondents in remote areas of the country.EVS 1990: Personal interview with standardized questionnaireEVS 1981: Personal interview with standardized questionnaire
    Description

    The European Values Study is a large-scale, cross-national and longitudinal survey research program on how Europeans think about family, work, religion, politics, and society. Repeated every nine years in an increasing number of countries, the survey provides insights into the ideas, beliefs, preferences, attitudes, values, and opinions of citizens all over Europe.

    The EVS Trend File 1981-2017 is constructed from the five EVS waves and covers almost 40 years. In altogether 160 surveys, more than 224.000 respondents from 48 countries/regions were interviewed. It is based on the updated data of the EVS Longitudinal Data File 1981-2008 (v.3.1.0) and the current EVS 2017 Integrated Dataset (v.5.0.0).

    For the EVS Trend File, a Restricted-Use File (ZA7504) is available in addition to the (factually anonymised) Scientific-Use File (ZA7503). The EVS Trend File – Sensitive Dataset (ZA7504) is provided as an add-on file. In addition to a small set of admin and protocol variables needed to merge with the SUF data, the Sensitive Dataset contains the following variables that could not be included in the scientific-use file due to their sensitive nature:

    W005_3 Job profession/industry (3-digit ISCO88) - spouse/partner EVS 2008 W005_3_01 Job profession/industry (3-digit ISCO08) - spouse/partner EVS 2017 W005_4 Job profession/industry (4-digit ISCO88) - spouse/partner EVS 2008 X035_3 Job profession/industry (3-digit ISCO88) – respondent EVS 1999, EVS 2008 X035_3_01 Job profession/industry (3-digit ISCO08) - respondent EVS 2017 X035_4 Job profession/industry (4-digit ISCO88) – respondent EVS 1999, EVS 2008 x048c_n3 Region where the interview was conducted (NUTS-3): NUTS version 2006 EVS 2008 X048J_N3 Region where the interview was conducted (NUTS-3): NUTS version 2016 EVS 2017 X049 Size of town (8 categories) EVS 2008, EVS 2017

    Detailed information on the anonymization process in the EVS Trend File is provided in the EVS Trend File Variable Report.
    Study number; version; Digital Object Identifier, EVS-wave; country (ISO 3166-1 Numeric code); original respondent number; unified respondent number; country (ISO 3166-1 Alpha-2 code); country - wave; job profession/industry (3-digit ISCO88) - spouse/partner; job profession/industry (3-digit ISCO08) - spouse/partner; job profession/industry (4-digit ISCO88) - spouse/partner; job profession/industry (3-digit ISCO88) - respondent; job profession/industry (3-digit ISCO08) - respondent; job profession/industry (4-digit ISCO88) - respondent; region where the interview was conducted (NUTS-3): NUTS version 2006; region where the interview was conducted (NUTS-3): NUTS version 2016; size of town (8 categories).

  7. EVS Trend File 1981-2017

    • datacatalogue.cessda.eu
    • search.gesis.org
    • +2more
    Updated Mar 15, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Gedeshi, Ilir; Zulehner, Paul M.; Rotman, David; Titarenko, Larissa; Billiet, Jaak; Dobbelaere, Karel; Kerkhofs, Jan; Swyngedouw, Marc; Voyé, Liliane; Fotev, Georgy; Marinov, Mario; Raichev, Andrei; Stoychev, Kancho; Kielty, J.F.; Nevitte, Neil; Baloban, Josip; Baloban, Stjepan; Roudometof, Victor; Rabusic, Ladislav; Rehak, Jan; Gundelach, Peter; Petersen, E.; Riis, Ole; Röhme, Nils; Saar, Andrus; Lotti, Leila; Pehkonen, Juhani; Puranen, Bi; Riffault, Hélène; Stoetzel, Jean; Tchernia, Jean-François; Pachulia, Merab; Jagodzinski, Wolfgang; Klingemann, Hans-Dieter; Köcher, Renate; Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth; Anheier, Helmut; Barker, David; Harding, Stephen; Heald, Gordon; Timms, Noel; Voas, David; Gari, Aikaterini; Georgas, James; Mylonas, Kostas; Hankiss, Elemer; Manchin, Robert; Rosta, Gergely; Tomka, Miklós; Haraldsson, Olafur; Jónsson, Fridrik H.; Olafsson, Stefan; Breen, Michael; Fahey, Tony; Fogarty, Michael; Kennedy, Kieran; Sinnott, Richard; Whelan, Chris; Abbruzzese, Salvatore; Calvaruso, Claudio; Gubert, Renzo; Rovati, Giancarlo; Zepa, Brigita; Alisauskiene, Rasa; Juknevicius, Stanislovas; Ziliukaite, Ruta; Estgen, Pol; Hausman, Pierre; Legrand, Michel; Petkovska, Antoanela; Abela, Anthony M.; Cachia-Caruana, Richard; Inganuez, Fr. Joe; Troisi, Joseph; Petruti, Doru; Besic, Milos; Arts, Wil A.; de Moor, Ruud; European Values Study; Hagenaars, Jacques A.P.; Halman, Loek; Luijkx, Ruud; Hayes, Bernadette C.; Smith, Alan; Listhaug, Ola; Jasinska-Kania, Aleksandra; Konieczna, Joanna; Marody, Mira; Cabral, Manuel Villaverde; Franca, Luis de; Ramos, Alice; Vala, Jorge; Pop, Lucien; Voicu, Malina; Zamfir, Catalin; Bashkirova, Elena; Gredelj, Stjepan; Kusá, Zuzana; Malnar, Brina; Tos, Niko; Elzo, Javier; Orizo, Francisco Andrés; Silvestre Cabrera, María; Bush, Karin; Wallman-Lundåsen, Susanne; Pettersson, Thorleif; Joye, Dominique; Esmer, Yilmaz; Balakireva, Olga; Inglehart, Ronald; Rosenberg, Florence; Sullivan, Edward; Pachulia, Merab; Poghosyan, Gevorg; Kritzinger, Sylvia; Kolenović-Đapo, Jadranka; Baloban, Josip; Frederiksen, Morten; Saar, Erki; Ketola, Kimmo; Wolf, Christof; Pachulia, Merab; Bréchon, Pierre; Jónsdóttir, Guðbjörg A.; Komar, Olivera; Reeskens, Tim; Jenssen, Anders T.; Soboleva, Natalia; Voicu, Bogdan; Strapcová, Katarina; Bešić, Miloš; Uhan, Samo; Ernst Stähli, Michèle; Mieriņa, Inta (2023). EVS Trend File 1981-2017 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.4232/1.14021
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 15, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Gallup Organizationhttp://gallup.com/
    Institute Economy and Prognoses, National Academy of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine
    Center for Economic and Social Studies (CESS), Albania
    Lithuanian Institute of Culture and Arts, Lithuania
    University of Deusto, Spain
    The Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Ireland
    BBSS Gallup International, Bulgaria
    GORBI (Georgian Opinion Research Business International), Tbilisi, Georgia
    Department of Social Sciences, GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim, Germany
    Saar Poll, Tallinn, Estonia
    University of Trondheim; Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
    Institut d’études politiques de Grenoble, Grenoble, France
    Belarus State University, Belarus
    Department of Sociology, Vilnius University, Lithuania
    Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Republic of Macedonia
    Aarhus University, Denmark
    SIFO, Sweden
    Swiss Foundation for Research in Social Sciences (FORS), University of Lausanne, Switzerland
    DATA S.A.; Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, Spain
    FORS, Swiss Foundation for Research in Social Sciences, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
    Department of Social Science, University College London, Great Britain
    Faculty for Social Wellbeing, New Bulgarian University, Sofia, Bulgaria
    Czech Republic
    University of Montenegro, Republic of Montenegro
    Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
    Statistics Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
    University of Athens, Greece
    University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
    University of Iceland, Iceland
    Slovak Academy of Sciences, Slovak Republic
    Department of Social Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden
    University of Cyprus, Cyprus
    Department of Sociology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands
    University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
    Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Hungary
    Baltic Institute of Social Sciences, Latvia
    Georgian Opinion Research Business International (GORBI), Georgia
    University of Malta, Malta
    London School of Economics and Political Science, Great Britain
    Institute for Social Research, Lithuania
    Masaryk University, Czech Republic
    Institut für Demoskopie Allensbach, Germany
    Faits et Opinions, France
    Uppsala University, Sweden
    University of Zagreb, Croatia
    Tilburg University, The Netherlands
    Hungarian Religious Research Centre, Hungary
    University of Trento, Italy
    Romanian Academy, Romania
    Malta
    SeSoPI Centre Intercommunautaire, Luxembourg
    University of Lisbon, Portugal
    University of Leicester, Great Britain
    Faculty of Social Sciences, Public Opinion and Mass Communication Research, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
    SAAR POLL, Estonia
    Institute of Marketing and Polls IMAS-INC, Republic of Moldova
    Faculty of Philosophy, University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
    De Facto Consultancy, Podgorica, Montenegro
    Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium
    Catholic Faculty of Theology, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
    University of Copenhagen, Denmark
    ISR, Great Britain
    Bashkirova & Partners, Russian Federation
    Berlin Science Center for Social Research, Germany
    Kirkon tutkimuskeskus, Tampere, Finland
    Bogazici University; Bahcesehir University, Turkey
    University of Belgrade, Serbia
    (Armenia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Northern Cyprus)
    University of Calgary, Canada
    Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Bulgaria
    TNS Gallup Oy, Finland
    Faculty of Political Sciences, University of Belgrade, Serbia
    Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate (CARA), USA
    Social Science Research Institute, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
    University of Vienna, Austria
    Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Hungary
    Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Italy
    CEPS/INSTEAD, Luxembourg
    University of Ulster, Northern Ireland
    Laboratory for Comparative Social Research, Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia
    Great Britain
    Tchernia Etudes Conseil, France
    Research institute for Quality of Life, Romanian Academy of Science, Bucharest, Romania
    Theseus International Management Institute, France
    University of Michigan, USA
    SORGU, Baku, Azerbaijan
    Department of Sociology and Political Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
    Department of Government, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Queen´s University Belfast, Northern Ireland
    University of Limerick, Ireland
    Institute of Philosophy, Sociology and Law, Armenian National Academy of Sciences, Yerevan, Armenia
    University of Warsaw, Poland
    University of Cologne, Germany
    Institute for Sociology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
    Authors
    Gedeshi, Ilir; Zulehner, Paul M.; Rotman, David; Titarenko, Larissa; Billiet, Jaak; Dobbelaere, Karel; Kerkhofs, Jan; Swyngedouw, Marc; Voyé, Liliane; Fotev, Georgy; Marinov, Mario; Raichev, Andrei; Stoychev, Kancho; Kielty, J.F.; Nevitte, Neil; Baloban, Josip; Baloban, Stjepan; Roudometof, Victor; Rabusic, Ladislav; Rehak, Jan; Gundelach, Peter; Petersen, E.; Riis, Ole; Röhme, Nils; Saar, Andrus; Lotti, Leila; Pehkonen, Juhani; Puranen, Bi; Riffault, Hélène; Stoetzel, Jean; Tchernia, Jean-François; Pachulia, Merab; Jagodzinski, Wolfgang; Klingemann, Hans-Dieter; Köcher, Renate; Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth; Anheier, Helmut; Barker, David; Harding, Stephen; Heald, Gordon; Timms, Noel; Voas, David; Gari, Aikaterini; Georgas, James; Mylonas, Kostas; Hankiss, Elemer; Manchin, Robert; Rosta, Gergely; Tomka, Miklós; Haraldsson, Olafur; Jónsson, Fridrik H.; Olafsson, Stefan; Breen, Michael; Fahey, Tony; Fogarty, Michael; Kennedy, Kieran; Sinnott, Richard; Whelan, Chris; Abbruzzese, Salvatore; Calvaruso, Claudio; Gubert, Renzo; Rovati, Giancarlo; Zepa, Brigita; Alisauskiene, Rasa; Juknevicius, Stanislovas; Ziliukaite, Ruta; Estgen, Pol; Hausman, Pierre; Legrand, Michel; Petkovska, Antoanela; Abela, Anthony M.; Cachia-Caruana, Richard; Inganuez, Fr. Joe; Troisi, Joseph; Petruti, Doru; Besic, Milos; Arts, Wil A.; de Moor, Ruud; European Values Study; Hagenaars, Jacques A.P.; Halman, Loek; Luijkx, Ruud; Hayes, Bernadette C.; Smith, Alan; Listhaug, Ola; Jasinska-Kania, Aleksandra; Konieczna, Joanna; Marody, Mira; Cabral, Manuel Villaverde; Franca, Luis de; Ramos, Alice; Vala, Jorge; Pop, Lucien; Voicu, Malina; Zamfir, Catalin; Bashkirova, Elena; Gredelj, Stjepan; Kusá, Zuzana; Malnar, Brina; Tos, Niko; Elzo, Javier; Orizo, Francisco Andrés; Silvestre Cabrera, María; Bush, Karin; Wallman-Lundåsen, Susanne; Pettersson, Thorleif; Joye, Dominique; Esmer, Yilmaz; Balakireva, Olga; Inglehart, Ronald; Rosenberg, Florence; Sullivan, Edward; Pachulia, Merab; Poghosyan, Gevorg; Kritzinger, Sylvia; Kolenović-Đapo, Jadranka; Baloban, Josip; Frederiksen, Morten; Saar, Erki; Ketola, Kimmo; Wolf, Christof; Pachulia, Merab; Bréchon, Pierre; Jónsdóttir, Guðbjörg A.; Komar, Olivera; Reeskens, Tim; Jenssen, Anders T.; Soboleva, Natalia; Voicu, Bogdan; Strapcová, Katarina; Bešić, Miloš; Uhan, Samo; Ernst Stähli, Michèle; Mieriņa, Inta
    Time period covered
    Mar 1, 1981 - Oct 1, 2021
    Area covered
    Norwegen, Kanada, Türkei, Irland, Schweiz, Spanien, Slowakei, Niederlande, Ukraine, Republik
    Measurement technique
    Persönliches Interview : Computerunterstützte Befragung (CAPI/CAMI), Telefonisches Interview: Computerunterstützte Befragung (CATI), Selbstausgefüllter Fragebogen: Webbasiert (CAWI), Persönliches Interview : Papier-und-Bleistift (PAPI), Selbstausgefüllter Fragebogen: Papier, Mixed-Mode-ErhebungsverfahrenPersönliches Interview: CAPI (Computerunterstützte persönliche Befragung)Persönliches Interview: PAPI (Papierfragebogen)Telefonisches Interview: CATI (Computerunterstützte telefonische Befragung)Selbstausfüller: CAWI (Computerunterstütztes Web-Interview)Selbstausfüller: PapierEVS 2017: In allen Ländern wurde die Feldarbeit auf der Grundlage detaillierter und einheitlicher Anweisungen der EVS-Beratergruppen durchgeführt. Der Hauptmodus in EVS 2017 ist Face-to-Face (vom Interviewer verwaltet). Eine alternative selbstverwaltete Form war möglich, aber als paralleler Mischmodus, d.h. es gab keine Wahlmöglichkeit für den Befragten zwischen den Modi: Entweder er/sie wurde persönlich zugewiesen, oder er/sie wurde dem Web- oder Web-/Mail-Format zugeordnet. In allen Ländern, die in die erste Vorabveröffentlichung einbezogen waren, wurde der EVS-Fragebogen als Face-to-Face-Interview (CAPI oder/und PAPI) durchgeführt.Der EVS 2017 Master-Fragebogen wurde auf Englisch zur Verfügung gestellt, und jeder nationale Programmdirektor musste sicherstellen, dass der Fragebogen in alle Sprachen übersetzt wurde, die von 5% oder mehr der Bevölkerung des Landes gesprochen wurden. Ein zentrales Team überwachte den Übersetzungsprozess mit Hilfe des von CentERdata (Tilburg) entwickelten Translation Management Tools (TMT).EVS 2008: Face-to-face Interviews mit standardisiertem Fragebogen. In allen Ländern wurde die Feldarbeit auf Basis detaillierter und einheitlicher Anweisungen durchgeführt die von den EVS Beratungsgremien ausgearbeitet wurden. In allen Ländern wurden die face-to-face Interviews in den Sprachen durchgeführt, die von mindestens 5 Prozent der jeweiligen Bevölkerung gesprochen werden. In nahezu allen Ländern wurden für die Datenerfassung CAPI oder PAPI Systeme verwendet. Ausnahmen bilden Finnland (Internet Panel) und Schweden (postalische Befragung). Der englische Ausgangsfragebogen wurde mit Hilfe des Fragebogen-Übersetzungssystems WebTrans übersetzt. Dies ist eine Übersetzungsplattform, die von Gallup Europe entwickelt wurde und es ermöglichte den Übersetzungsprozess umfassend zu dokumentieren und genau zu überprüfen (siehe EVS (2010): EVS 2008 Guidelines and Recommendations. GESIS-Technical Reports 2010/16. Retrieved from: <a href=http://www.europeanvaluesstudy.eu/ target=_blank> EVS webpage </a> EVS 1999: Face-to-face Interviews mit standardisiertem Fragebogen. In Island wurde etwa ein Viertel der Befragten über Telefon interviewt da diese in entlegenen Teilen des Landes lebten. EVS 1990: Persönliches Interview mit standardisiertem Fragebogen EVS 1981: Persönliches Interview mit standardisiertem Fragebogen
    Description

    Die European Values Study ist ein groß angelegtes, länderübergreifendes und längsschnittliches Umfrageforschungsprogramm darüber, wie die Europäer über Familie, Arbeit, Religion, Politik und Gesellschaft denken. Die Umfrage wird alle neun Jahre in einer wachsenden Anzahl von Ländern wiederholt und gibt Einblicke in die Ideen, Überzeugungen, Präferenzen, Einstellungen, Werte und Meinungen der Bürger in ganz Europa.

    Das EVS Trend File 1981-2017 wird aus den fünf EVS-Wellen erstellt und deckt fast 40 Jahre ab. In insgesamt 160 Umfragen wurden mehr als 224.000 Befragte aus 48 Ländern/Regionen befragt. Es basiert auf den aktualisierten Daten des EVS Longitudinal Data File 1981-2008 (v.3.1.0) und dem aktuellen EVS 2017 Integrated Dataset (v.5.0.0).

    Sie folgt einem neuen Ansatz, der mit der WVS vereinbart wurde, um die früheren großen EVS- und WVS-Längsschnitt-Trenddateien in schlankere und einfacher zu verwendende Dateien umzuwandeln. Sowohl die EVS- als auch die WVS-Trenddateien basieren auf dem aktualisierten Common EVS/WVS Dictionary (v.2021). Es enthält nur die Variablen/Fragen, die seit den frühen 1980er Jahren von EVS und/oder WVS repliziert wurden. Der EVS Trend File und der World Values Survey Trend File (1981-2022) können so leicht zusammengeführt werden. Die daraus resultierende Integrated Values Surveys 1981-2022 Datendatei enthält die fünf Wellen der EVS und die sieben Wellen der WVS.
    1. Wahrnehmungen des Lebens: Bedeutung von Familie, Freunden und Bekannten, Freizeit, Politik, Arbeit und Religion; Glücksempfinden; Selbsteinschätzung des Gesundheitszustandes; Gefühle: jemals aufgeregt oder interessiert gefühlt, unruhig, stolz wegen Komplimenten, sehr einsam oder entfernt von anderen Menschen, erfreut darüber, etwas erreicht zu haben, gelangweilt, auf dem Gipfel der Welt, sehr unglücklich, dass die Dinge so laufen, verärgert wegen Kritik; Mitgliedschaften und freiwillige Arbeit (unbezahlte Arbeit) in: Sozialeinrichtungen, religiösen oder kirchlichen Organisationen, Bildung, Kunst, Musik oder kulturellen Aktivitäten, Gewerkschaften, politischen Parteien, kommunalpolitischen Aktionen, Menschenrechten, Naturschutz, Umwelt, Ökologie, Tierschutz, Berufsverbänden, Jugendarbeit, Sportvereinen, Frauengruppen, Friedensbewegung, Organisationen, die sich mit Gesundheit befassen, Verbrauchergruppen oder anderen Gruppen, humanitären oder karitativen Organisationen, Selbsthilfegruppen, Hilfsorganisationen auf Gegenseitigkeit, Zugehörigkeit zu keiner; Gründe für ehrenamtliche Arbeit (z. z. B. Solidarität mit Armen und Benachteiligten, Mitgefühl für Bedürftige, etc. ); Toleranz gegenüber Minderheiten als Nachbarn (Vorbestrafte, Andersrassige, starke Trinker, psychisch labile Menschen, Muslime, Einwanderer, Fremdarbeiter, AIDS-Kranke, Drogenabhängige, Homosexuelle, Juden, Zigeuner, Christen, Linksextremisten, Rechtsextremisten, Menschen mit großen Familien und Hindus); den meisten Menschen kann man vertrauen; Einschätzung des fairen und hilfsbereiten Verhaltens von Menschen; Zufriedenheit mit dem Leben; innere oder äußere Kontrolle; Freizeit: Zeit verbringen mit: Freunden, Arbeitskollegen, mit Menschen in der Kirche, Moschee oder Synagoge, mit Menschen beim Sport, in der Kultur, in kommunalen Organisationen.

    1. Familie und Ehe: Einstellung zu Respekt und Liebe für die Eltern; Verantwortung der Eltern für ihre Kinder; wichtige Eigenschaften der Kinder (gute Manieren, Unabhängigkeit, harte Arbeit, Verantwortungsgefühl, Phantasie, Toleranz und Respekt für andere Menschen, Sparsamkeit beim Sparen von Geld und Dingen, Entschlossenheit, Ausdauer, religiöser Glaube, Selbstlosigkeit, Gehorsam, keine); Rechtfertigung der Abtreibung, wenn die Gesundheit der Mutter gefährdet ist, wenn das Kind körperlich behindert ist, wenn die Frau nicht verheiratet ist, wenn sie keine weiteren Kinder will; Vertrauen in die Familie; Zufriedenheit mit dem häuslichen Leben; gemeinsame Einstellungen mit dem Partner (Einstellungen zu Religion, Moral, sozialen Einstellungen, politischen Ansichten, sexuellen Einstellungen, keine gemeinsamen Einstellungen) und gemeinsame Einstellungen mit den Eltern; ideale Anzahl von Kindern; ein Kind braucht ein Zuhause mit Vater und Mutter; eine Frau muss Kinder haben, um erfüllt zu sein; ein Mann muss Kinder haben, um erfüllt zu sein; die Ehe ist eine überholte Institution; Ansicht über die Frau als Alleinerziehende; sexuelle Freiheit genießen; langfristige Beziehung ist notwendig, um glücklich zu sein; Pflicht gegenüber der Gesellschaft, Kinder zu haben; es ist die Pflicht des Kindes, sich um den kranken Elternteil zu kümmern; wichtigste Kriterien für eine erfolgreiche Ehe oder Partnerschaft (Treue, ausreichendes Einkommen, gleicher sozialer Hintergrund, Respekt und Wertschätzung, religiöser Glaube, gute Wohnsituation, Übereinstimmung in der Politik, Verständnis und Toleranz, abseits der Schwiegereltern, glückliche sexuelle Beziehung, gemeinsame Hausarbeit, Kinder, Besprechung von Problemen, gemeinsame...
  8. c

    European Values Study 2017: Finland - Swedish minority (EVS 2017 Country...

    • datacatalogue.cessda.eu
    • search.gesis.org
    • +2more
    Updated Mar 15, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Schoultz, Åsa von (2023). European Values Study 2017: Finland - Swedish minority (EVS 2017 Country data file) [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.4232/1.13513
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 15, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
    Authors
    Schoultz, Åsa von
    Time period covered
    Nov 26, 2018 - Jan 31, 2019
    Area covered
    Finland
    Measurement technique
    Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based (CAWI), Self-administered questionnaire: Paper
    Description

    The European Values Study is a large-scale, cross-national and longitudinal survey research program on how Europeans think about family, work, religion, politics, and society. Repeated every nine years in an increasing number of countries, the survey provides insights into the ideas, beliefs, preferences, attitudes, values, and opinions of citizens all over Europe.

    As previous waves conducted in 1981, 1990, 1999, 2008, the fifth EVS wave maintains a persistent focus on a broad range of values. Questions are highly comparable across waves and regions, making EVS suitable for research aimed at studying trends over time.

    The new wave has seen a strengthening of the methodological standards. The full release of the EVS 2017 includes data and documentation of altogether 37 participating countries. For more information, please go to the EVS website.

    Morale, religious, societal, political, work, and family values of Europeans.

    Topics: 1. Perceptions of life: importance of work, family, friends and acquaintances, leisure time, politics and religion; happiness; self-assessment of own health; memberships in voluntary organisations (religious or church organisations, cultural activities, trade unions, political parties or groups, environment, ecology, animal rights, professional associations, sports, recreation, or other groups, none); active or inactive membership of humanitarian or charitable organisation, consumer organisation, self-help group or mutual aid; voluntary work in the last six months; tolerance towards minorities (people of a different race, heavy drinkers, immigrants, foreign workers, drug addicts, homosexuals, Christians, Muslims, Jews, and gypsies - social distance); trust in people; estimation of people´s fair and helpful behavior; internal or external control; satisfaction with life; importance of educational goals: desirable qualities of children.

    1. Work: attitude towards work (job needed to develop talents, receiving money without working is humiliating, people turn lazy not working, work is a duty towards society, work always comes first); importance of selected aspects of occupational work; give priority to nationals over foreigners as well as men over women in jobs.

    2. Religion and morale: religious denomination; current and former religious denomination; current frequency of church attendance and at the age of 12; self-assessment of religiousness; belief in God, life after death, hell, heaven, and re-incarnation; personal god vs. spirit or life force; importance of God in one´s life (10-point-scale); frequency of prayers; morale attitudes (scale: claiming state benefits without entitlement, cheating on taxes, taking soft drugs, accepting a bribe, homosexuality, abortion, divorce, euthanasia, suicide, paying cash to avoid taxes, casual sex, avoiding fare on public transport, prostitution, in-vitro fertilization, political violence, death penalty).

    3. Family: trust in family; most important criteria for a successful marriage or partnership (faithfulness, adequate income, good housing, sharing household chores, children, time for friends and personal hobbies); marriage is an outdated institution; attitude towards traditional understanding of one´s role of man and woman in occupation and family (gender roles); homosexual couples are as good parents as other couples; duty towards society to have children; responsibility of adult children for their parents when they are in need of long-term care; to make own parents proud is a main goal in life.

    4. Politics and society: political interest; political participation; preference for individual freedom or social equality; self-assessment on a left-right continuum (10-point-scale) (left-right self-placement); individual vs. state responsibility for providing; take any job vs. right to refuse job when unemployed; competition good vs. harmful for people; equal incomes vs. incentives for individual effort; private vs. government ownership of business and industry; postmaterialism (scale); most important aims of the country for the next ten years; willingness to fight for the country; expectation of future development (less importance placed on work and greater respect for authority); trust in institutions; essential characteristics of democracy; importance of democracy for the respondent; rating democracy in own country; satisfaction with the political system in the country; preferred type of political system (strong leader, expert decisions, army should rule the country, or democracy); vote in elections on local level, national level and European level; political party with the most appeal; another political party that most appeals; assessment of country´s elections (votes are counted fairly, opposition candidates are prevented from running, TV news favors the governing party, voters are bribed, journalists provide fair coverage of elections, election officials are fair, rich people buy elections, voters are threatened with violence at the...

  9. c

    European Values Study, 2017

    • datacatalogue.cessda.eu
    Updated Jun 1, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Voas, D (2025). European Values Study, 2017 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-854840
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    University College London
    Authors
    Voas, D
    Time period covered
    Jun 1, 2017 - Nov 30, 2018
    Area covered
    Great Britain
    Variables measured
    Individual
    Measurement technique
    Computer-assisted personal interviews, following selection of addresses via multistage random sampling.
    Description

    The European Values Study (EVS) is a large-scale, cross-national, repeated cross-sectional survey research programme on how Europeans think about family, work, religion, politics and society. The survey, which has been conducted every nine years since 1981, provides insights into the ideas, beliefs, preferences, attitudes, values, and opinions of people living in Europe. This record concerns British participation in the fifth wave, EVS 2017, which was carried out in conjunction with the seventh wave of the World Values Survey.

    The European Values Study (EVS) is a large-scale, cross-national, repeated cross-sectional survey research programme on basic human values. It provides insights into the ideas, beliefs, preferences, attitudes, values and opinions of citizens all over Europe. It is a unique investigation into how Europeans think about life, family, work, religion, politics and society.

    The EVS started in 1981, when a thousand citizens in each of the European member states of that time were interviewed using standardized questionnaires. The survey has been repeated every nine years in an increasing number of countries. The fourth wave in 2008 covered no fewer than 46 European countries, from Ireland to Azerbaijan and from Portugal to Norway. The fifth wave in 2017 is being run in cooperation with the World Values Survey (which grew out of the EVS) and will extend to scores of countries around the world.

    This grant will support British participation in the 2017 EVS/WVS survey.

    The central research question is whether values are changing in modern European society, to what extent and in what direction. Values are basic convictions that are prior to, and help to organize, more particular attitudes, actions and moral judgments. The question of how and why values are changing is important because values determine what people care about, with potentially profound impact on society and politics.

    The questionnaire covers topics that include national identity, culture, diversity, insecurity, support for democracy, tolerance of foreigners and ethnic minorities, support for gender equality, the role of religion, the impact of globalization, attitudes towards the environment, work, family, politics, subjective well-being, and so on. The questionnaire also contains items on issues of personal and civic ethics, from smoking indoors to suicide. The overarching topic of the current EVS wave is 'Social Solidarity and European Identity'.

    Many of the items replicate those from previous surveys, thus enabling analysis of change over time on the key dimensions. With the addition of the new wave, the EVS/WVS study will be a unique source of trend data for the past four decades. The range of potential research questions that can be addressed by scholars and research users is very wide, involving any of the topics covered, using either this dataset on its own or in conjunction with previous waves, and looking either at Great Britain alone, comparisons within Europe, or global cross-national comparisons.

    The EVS allows researchers to investigate whether economic harmonisation is accompanied by cultural and ideological integration. Three and a half decades on from the first survey in 1981, the questions are as important as ever. The benefits of transnationalism are disputed; the impact of globalisation in an open market has been strongly felt, and debates continue over the nature of national identity and the consequences of cultural diversity. Support for both the European project and the development of multicultural societies has wavered, divided to some extent along social fault lines defined by region, generation, education and class.

  10. c

    European Values Study 2017: Greece (EVS 2017 Country data file)

    • datacatalogue.cessda.eu
    • dbk.gesis.org
    • +3more
    Updated Mar 15, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Gari, Aikaterini (2023). European Values Study 2017: Greece (EVS 2017 Country data file) [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.4232/1.13512
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 15, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Department of Psychology, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
    Authors
    Gari, Aikaterini
    Time period covered
    Dec 15, 2018 - Jan 31, 2019
    Area covered
    Griechenland
    Measurement technique
    Selbstausgefüllter Fragebogen: Webbasiert (CAWI)
    Description

    Die European Values Study ist ein groß angelegtes, länderübergreifendes und längsschnittliches Umfrage-Forschungsprogramm zu der Frage, wie Europäer über Familie, Arbeit, Religion, Politik und Gesellschaft denken. Die Umfrage wird alle neun Jahre in einer wachsenden Zahl von Ländern wiederholt und bietet Einblicke in die Ideen, Überzeugungen, Präferenzen, Einstellungen, Werte und Meinungen der Bürger in ganz Europa.

    Wie die vorhergehenden Erhebungen in den Jahren 1981, 1990, 1999 und 2008 konzentriert sich auch die fünfte EVS-Welle weiterhin auf ein breites Spektrum von Werten. Die Fragen sind zwischen den Wellen und Regionen in hohem Maße vergleichbar, so dass sich der EVS für Forschungsarbeiten zur Untersuchung von Trends im Zeitverlauf eignet.

    Mit der neuen Welle wurden die methodischen Standards gestärkt. Das full release des EVS 2017 enthält Daten und Dokumentationen von insgesamt 37 teilnehmenden Ländern. Weitere Informationen finden Sie auf der Website des EVS.

    Moralische, religiöse, gesellschaftliche, politische, berufliche und familiäre Werte der Europäer.

    Themen: 1. Wahrnehmungen des Lebens: Bedeutung von Arbeit, Familie, Freunden und Bekannten, Freizeit, Politik und Religion; Glück; Selbsteinschätzung der eigenen Gesundheit; Mitgliedschaften in Freiwilligenorganisationen (religiöse oder kirchliche Organisationen, kulturelle Aktivitäten, Gewerkschaften, politische Parteien oder Gruppen, Umwelt, Ökologie, Tierrechte, Berufsverbände, Sport, Freizeit oder andere Gruppen, keine); aktive oder inaktive Mitgliedschaft in humanitären oder karitativen Organisationen, Verbraucherorganisationen, Selbsthilfegruppen oder gegenseitige Unterstützung; Freiwilligenarbeit in den letzten sechs Monaten; Toleranz gegenüber Minderheiten (Menschen anderer Rassen, starke Trinker, Einwanderer, Ausländer, Drogenabhängige, Homosexuelle, Christen, Muslime, Juden und Zigeuner - soziale Distanz); Vertrauen in Menschen; Einschätzung von fairem und hilfsbereitem Verhalten; interne oder externe Kontrolle; Lebenszufriedenheit; Bedeutung von Bildungszielen: wünschenswerte Eigenschaften von Kindern.

    1. Arbeit: Einstellung zur Arbeit (Arbeit wird zur Entwicklung von Talenten benötigt, Geld ohne Arbeit zu erhalten, ist demütigend, Menschen werden faul, wenn sie nicht arbeiten, Arbeit ist eine Pflicht gegenüber der Gesellschaft, Arbeit steht immer an erster Stelle); Bedeutung ausgewählter Aspekte der beruflichen Arbeit; Vorrang von Einheimischen vor Ausländern sowie Männern vor Frauen im Job.

    2. Religion und Moral: Religionsgemeinschaft; aktuelle und ehemalige Religionsgemeinschaft; Kirchgangshäufigkeit derzeit und im Alter von 12 Jahren; Selbsteinschätzung der Religiosität; Glaube an Gott, Leben nach dem Tod, Hölle, Himmel und Wiedergeburt; persönlicher Gott vs. Geist oder Lebenskraft; Bedeutung Gottes im eigenen Leben (10-Punkte-Skala); Häufigkeit von Gebeten; Moralvorstellungen (Skala: Inanspruchnahme von staatlichen Leistungen ohne Anspruch, Steuerbetrug, Einnahme von weichen Drogen, Annehmen von Bestechungsgeldern, Homosexualität, Abtreibung, Scheidung, Euthanasie, Selbstmord, Barzahlung zur Vermeidung von Steuern, Gelegenheitssex, Schwarzfahren im öffentlichen Verkehr, Prostitution, In-vitro-Fertilisation, politische Gewalt, Todesstrafe).

    3. Familie: Vertrauen in die Familie; wichtigste Kriterien für eine erfolgreiche Ehe oder Partnerschaft (Treue, angemessenes Einkommen, gutes Wohnen, Aufteilung der Haushaltsarbeit, Kinder, Zeit für Freunde und persönliche Hobbys); Ehe ist eine veraltete Institution; Einstellung zum traditionellen Verständnis der Rolle von Mann und Frau in Beruf und Familie (Geschlechterrollen); homosexuelle Paare sind ebenso gute Eltern wie andere Paare; Verpflichtung gegenüber der Gesellschaft, Kinder zu bekommen; Verantwortung von erwachsenen Kindern für ihre Eltern, wenn sie langfristig betreut werden müssen; Hauptziel im Leben die eigenen Eltern stolz zu machen.

    4. Politik und Gesellschaft: Politikinteresse; politische Partizipation; Präferenz für individuelle Freiheit oder soziale Gleichheit; Selbsteinschätzung auf einem Links-rechts Kontinuum (10-Punkte-Skala); individuelle vs. staatliche Verantwortung für die Bereitstellung; Übernahme jedes Jobs vs. Recht auf Ablehnung eines Jobs durch Arbeitslose; Wettbewerb gut vs. schädlich für Menschen; gleiche Einkommen vs. Anreize für individuelle Anstrengungen; privates vs. Staatseigentum von Wirtschaft und Industrie; Postmaterialismus (Skala); wichtigste Ziele des Landes für die nächsten zehn Jahre; Bereitschaft, für das Land zu kämpfen; Erwartung der zukünftigen Entwicklung (weniger Bedeutung der Arbeit und größere Achtung der Autorität); Institutionenvertrauen; wesentliche Merkmale der Demokratie; Bedeutung der Demokratie für den Befragten; Bewertung der Demokratie im eigenen Land; Zufriedenheit mit dem politischen System im Land; bevorzugte Art des politischen Systems (starker Führer, Expertenentscheidungen, Armee sollte das Land regieren, oder...

  11. d

    Data from: Joint EVS/WVS 2017-2021 Dataset (Joint EVS/WVS)

    • da-ra.de
    • eprints.soton.ac.uk
    Updated Nov 13, 2020
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    EVS/WVS (2020). Joint EVS/WVS 2017-2021 Dataset (Joint EVS/WVS) [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.14281/18241.2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 13, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    GESIS Data Archive
    da|ra
    Authors
    EVS/WVS
    Time period covered
    Jan 18, 2017 - Mar 7, 2017
    Description

    Die European Value Study (EVS) und die World Value Survey (WVS) sind zwei groß angelegte, länderübergreifende und längsschnittliche Umfrage-Forschungsprogramme. Sie umfassen eine große Anzahl von Fragen, die seit Anfang der achtziger Jahre repliziert wurden.

    Beide Organisationen vereinbarten, ab 2017 bei der gemeinsamen Datenerhebung zusammenzuarbeiten. Der EVS war verantwortlich für die Planung und Durchführung von Umfragen in europäischen Ländern unter Verwendung des EVS-Fragebogens und der methodischen Richtlinien des EVS. Der WVSA war für die Planung und Durchführung von Umfragen in Ländern außerhalb Europas verantwortlich, wobei der WVS-Fragebogen und die methodischen Richtlinien des WVS verwendet wurden. Beide Organisationen entwickelten ihre Entwürfe für Master-Fragebögen unabhängig voneinander. Die gemeinsamen Items definieren den gemeinsamen Kern beider Fragebögen.

    Der Gemeinsame EVS/WVS wird aus den beiden Quellendatensätzen des EVS und des WVS erstellt: - Integrierter Datensatz der European Values Study 2017 (EVS 2017), ZA7500 Data file Version 4.0.0, doi:10.4232/1.13560 (https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13560). - World Values Survey: Round Seven-Country-Pooled Datafile. Version 1.0.5, doi: 10.14281/18241.1 (https://doi.org/10.14281/18241.1).

    Moralische, religiöse, gesellschaftliche, politische, berufliche und familiäre Werte.

    Themen: 1. Lebenswahrnehmung: Bedeutung von Familie, Freunden, Freizeit, Politik, Arbeit und Religion; Glücksgefühl; Selbsteinschätzung des Gesundheitszustandes; Lebenszufriedenheit; interne oder externe Kontrolle; Bedeutung von Bildungszielen: erwünschte Eigenschaften von Kindern; Mitgliedschaft in freiwilligen Organisationen (religiöse Organisationen, kulturelle Aktivitäten, Gewerkschaften, politische Parteien oder Gruppen, Naturschutz, Umwelt, Ökologie, Tierrechte, Berufsverbände, Sport, Erholung, Verbrauchergruppen oder andere Gruppen); Mitgliedschaft in humanitären oder karitativen Organisationen, Selbsthilfegruppen oder gegenseitige Hilfe; Toleranz gegenüber Minderheiten (Menschen einer anderen Rasse, starke Trinker, Immigranten/Ausländer, Drogenabhängige, Homosexuelle - soziale Distanz); Vertrauen in Menschen; Schutz der Umwelt vs. wirtschaftliches Wachstum.

    1. Arbeit: Einstellung zur Arbeit (Menschen, die nicht arbeiten, werden faul, Arbeit ist eine Pflicht gegenüber der Gesellschaft, die Arbeit steht immer an erster Stelle); Arbeit ist knapp: Männer sollten mehr Recht auf einen Arbeitsplatz haben als Frauen (3-Punkte-Skala und 5-Punkte-Skala), Arbeitgeber sollten Menschen (der Nation) Vorrang vor Einwanderern geben (3-Punkte-Skala und 5-Punkte-Skala).

    2. Religion und Moral: Religionszugehörigkeit; derzeitige Häufigkeit des Besuchs von Gottesdiensten; Häufigkeit des Gebets (WVS7); außerhalb der Gottesdienste zu Gott beten (EVS5); Selbsteinschätzung der Religiosität; Glaube an Gott, Leben nach dem Tod, Hölle und Himmel; Bedeutung Gottes im eigenen Leben; moralische Einstellungen (Skala: Inanspruchnahme staatlicher Leistungen ohne Anspruch, Umgehung von Fahrgeldern in öffentlichen Verkehrsmitteln, Steuerbetrug, Annahme von Bestechungsgeldern, Homosexualität, Prostitution, Abtreibung, Scheidung, Euthanasie, Selbstmord, Gelegenheitssex, politische Gewalt, Todesstrafe).

    3. Familie: Einstellung zum traditionellen Verständnis der eigenen Rolle von Mann und Frau in Beruf und Familie (Geschlechterrollen); homosexuelle Paare sind genauso gute Eltern wie andere Paare; Pflicht gegenüber der Gesellschaft, Kinder zu haben; es ist die Pflicht des Kindes, sich um den kranken Elternteil zu kümmern; eines der Hauptziele im Leben ist es, die eigenen Eltern stolz zu machen.

    4. Politik und Gesellschaft: wichtigste Ziele des Landes für die nächsten zehn Jahre (erste Wahl, zweite Wahl), Ziele des Befragten (erste Wahl, zweite Wahl)); postmaterialistischer Index 4; Bereitschaft, für das Land zu kämpfen; Erwartungen an die zukünftige Entwicklung (weniger Bedeutung von Arbeit und größerer Respekt vor Autorität); politisches Interesse; politische Partizipation (politische Aktion: Unterzeichnung einer Petition, Teilnahme an Boykotten, Teilnahme an rechtmäßigen/friedlichen Demonstrationen, Teilnahme an inoffiziellen Streiks); politische Selbsteinstufung; gleiches Einkommen vs. Anreize für individuelle Anstrengung; privates vs. staatliches Eigentum an Unternehmen und Industrie; individuelle vs. staatliche Verantwortung für die Versorgung; Wettbewerb ist gut vs. schädlich für die Menschen; Vertrauen in Institutionen (Kirchen, Streitkräfte, Presse, Gewerkschaften, Polizei, Parlament, öffentliche Dienste, große regionale Organisationen (kombiniert aus länderspezifischen), die Europäische Union, die Regierung, die politischen Parteien, Großunternehmen, die Umweltschutzbewegung, Justiz/Gerichte, die Vereinten Nationen); Zufriedenheit mit dem politischen System des Landes; bevorzugte Art des politischen Systems (starker Führer, Expertenentscheidungen, Armee sollte das Land regieren, oder Demok...

  12. European Values Study 2017: Finnish Data

    • services.fsd.tuni.fi
    • datacatalogue.cessda.eu
    zip
    Updated Jan 9, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    European Values Study Group (2025). European Values Study 2017: Finnish Data [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.60686/t-fsd3213
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 9, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Finnish Social Science Data Archive
    Authors
    European Values Study Group
    Area covered
    Finland
    Description

    The European Values Study is a population-level study charting Finnish moral views, religious and social attitudes, and values. The 2017 EVS survey focused on equality between groups of people, tolerance, religious behaviour, democracy, and citizenship. First, the respondents were asked what they considered to be the most important things in their lives, and how they perceived their happiness and health. The respondents' participation in association work was also queried as well as trust in and prejudice against different groups of people. Next, the respondents were presented with a set of attitudinal statements concerning work which charted, for instance, the most important aspects of work and views on unemployment. The next questions covered the respondents' religious behaviour, relationships and family life. They were asked whether they belonged to a religious community and whether they had religious habits, such as praying or going to the church. The respondents' views were charted on factors affecting the success of a relationship, work division and equality between genders, and trust in the institution of marriage. They were also asked which characteristics they considered important in a good child. The respondents' political attitudes and behaviour were examined next with questions concerning participation in politics, responsibilities of the individual and of the society, the free market, and the future of society. The respondents' trust in different institutions in society was also charted, and views on the state of democracy were examined. For instance, the respondents were asked what they considered the essential features of democracy and how well democracy functioned in Finland at the time of the survey. Finally, questions charted the respondents' values with questions concerning, for instance, the acceptability of prostitution or death penalty, regional identity and how it is defined, behaviour in elections, and attitudes toward immigrants. The respondents were also presented with attitudinal statements regarding environmental issues, authorities' access to citizens' personal information, social responsibility of relatives, friends and unknown people. Background variables included age, gender, marital status, country where R was born, number of children, education, economic activity, income, and parents' educational background. Background information concerning the respondents' spouses was also collected.

  13. EVs per charging point worldwide 2017-2024

    • statista.com
    • ai-chatbox.pro
    Updated May 23, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). EVs per charging point worldwide 2017-2024 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1312905/evs-per-charging-point-worldwide/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 23, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    There were on average around 11 light-duty electric vehicles per charging point worldwide in 2024. This volume had been fluctuating since 2017, when it was at its lowest, with 7.6 electric vehicles per charging point.

  14. c

    European Values Study Longitudinal Data File 1981-2008 (EVS 1981-2008) –...

    • datacatalogue.cessda.eu
    • search.gesis.org
    • +2more
    Updated Mar 14, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Gedeshi, Ilir; Zulehner, Paul M.; Rotman, David; Titarenko, Larissa; Billiet, Jaak; Dobbelaere, Karel; Kerkhofs, Jan; Swyngedouw, Marc; Voyé, Liliane; Fotev, Georgy; Marinov, Mario; Raichev, Andrei; Stoychev, Kancho; Kielty, J.F.; Nevitte, Neil; Baloban, Josip; Roudometof, Victor; Rabusic, Ladislav; Rehak, Jan; Gundelach, Peter; Petersen, E.; Riis, Ole; Röhme, Nils; Saar, Andrus; Lotti, Leila; Pehkonen, Juhani; Puranen, Bi; Riffault, Hélène; Stoetzel, Jean; Tchernia, Jean-François; Pachulia, Merab; Jagodzinski, Wolfgang; Klingemann, Hans-Dieter; Köcher, Renate; Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth; Anheier, Helmut; Barker, David; Harding, Stephen; Heald, Gordon; Timms, Noel; Voas, David; Gari, Aikaterini; Georgas, James; Mylonas, Kostas; Hankiss, Elemer; Manchin, Robert; Rosta, Gergely; Tomka, Miklós; Haraldsson, Olafur; Jónsson, Fridrik H.; Olafsson, Stefan; Breen, Michael; Fahey, Tony; Fogarty, Michael; Kennedy, Kieran; Sinnott, Richard; Whelan, Chris; Abbruzzese, Salvatore; Calvaruso, Claudio; Gubert, Renzo; Rovati, Giancarlo; Zepa, Brigita; Alisauskiene, Rasa; Juknevicius, Stanislovas; Ziliukaite, Ruta; Estgen, Pol; Hausman, Pierre; Legrand, Michel; Petkovska, Antoanela; Abela, Anthony M.; Cachia-Caruana, Richard; Inganuez, Fr. Joe; Troisi, Joseph; Petruti, Doru; Besic, Milos; Arts, Wil A.; de Moor, Ruud; European Values Study; Hagenaars, Jacques A.P.; Halman, Loek; Luijkx, Ruud; Hayes, Bernadette C.; Smith, Alan; Listhaug, Ola; Jasinska-Kania, Aleksandra; Konieczna, Joanna; Marody, Mira; Cabral, Manuel Villaverde; Franca, Luis de; Ramos, Alice; Vala, Jorge; Pop, Lucien; Voicu, Malina; Zamfir, Catalin; Bashkirova, Elena; Gredelj, Stjepan; Kusá, Zuzana; Malnar, Brina; Tos, Niko; Elzo, Javier; Orizo, Francisco Andrés; Silvestre Cabrera, María; Bush, Karin; Lundasen, Susanne; Pettersson, Thorleif; Joye, Dominique; Esmer, Yilmaz; Balakireva, Olga; Inglehart, Ronald; Rosenberg, Florence; Sullivan, Edward (2023). European Values Study Longitudinal Data File 1981-2008 (EVS 1981-2008) – Restricted Use File [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.4232/1.5174
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 14, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Lithuanian Institute of Culture and Arts, Lithuania
    University of Deusto, Spain
    The Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Ireland
    National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine
    BBSS Gallup International, Bulgaria
    University of Trondheim; Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
    Belarus State University, Belarus
    Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Republic of Macedonia
    Aarhus University, Denmark
    SIFO, Sweden
    Swiss Foundation for Research in Social Sciences (FORS), University of Lausanne, Switzerland
    The Gallup Organization, Canada
    DATA S.A.; Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, Spain
    Czech Republic
    University of Montenegro, Republic of Montenegro
    Gallup, Great Britain
    Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
    University of Athens, Greece
    Center for Economic and Social Studies, Albania
    University of Iceland, Iceland
    Slovak Academy of Sciences, Slovak Republic
    University of Cyprus, Cyprus
    University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
    Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Hungary
    Baltic Institute of Social Sciences, Latvia
    Georgian Opinion Research Business International (GORBI), Georgia
    University of Malta, Malta
    London School of Economics and Political Science, Great Britain
    Institute for Social Research, Lithuania
    Masaryk University, Czech Republic
    Institut für Demoskopie Allensbach, Germany
    Faits et Opinions, France
    Uppsala University, Sweden
    University of Zagreb, Croatia
    Tilburg University, The Netherlands
    Hungarian Religious Research Centre, Hungary
    University of Trento, Italy
    Romanian Academy, Romania
    Malta
    Ersta Sköndal University College, Sweden
    SeSoPI Centre Intercommunautaire, Luxembourg
    University of Lisbon, Portugal
    University of Leicester, Great Britain
    SAAR POLL, Estonia
    Institute of Marketing and Polls IMAS-INC, Republic of Moldova
    Institute of Culture, Philosophy and Art, Lithuania
    Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium
    University of Copenhagen, Denmark
    ISR, Great Britain
    Bashkirova & Partners, Russian Federation
    Berlin Science Center for Social Research, Germany
    Bogazici University; Bahcesehir University, Turkey
    University of Belgrade, Serbia
    (Armenia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Northern Cyprus)
    University of Calgary, Canada
    Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Bulgaria
    TNS Gallup Oy, Finland
    University of Manchester, Great Britain
    Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate (CARA), USA
    Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Hungary
    Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Italy
    CEPS/INSTEAD, Luxembourg
    University of Ulster, Northern Ireland
    Great Britain
    Tchernia Etudes Conseil, France
    Theseus International Management Institute, France
    Queen´s University Belfast, Northern Ireland
    University of Limerick, Ireland
    University of Warsaw, Poland
    University of Cologne, Germany
    University of Vienna, Austria
    University of Michigan, USA
    Authors
    Gedeshi, Ilir; Zulehner, Paul M.; Rotman, David; Titarenko, Larissa; Billiet, Jaak; Dobbelaere, Karel; Kerkhofs, Jan; Swyngedouw, Marc; Voyé, Liliane; Fotev, Georgy; Marinov, Mario; Raichev, Andrei; Stoychev, Kancho; Kielty, J.F.; Nevitte, Neil; Baloban, Josip; Roudometof, Victor; Rabusic, Ladislav; Rehak, Jan; Gundelach, Peter; Petersen, E.; Riis, Ole; Röhme, Nils; Saar, Andrus; Lotti, Leila; Pehkonen, Juhani; Puranen, Bi; Riffault, Hélène; Stoetzel, Jean; Tchernia, Jean-François; Pachulia, Merab; Jagodzinski, Wolfgang; Klingemann, Hans-Dieter; Köcher, Renate; Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth; Anheier, Helmut; Barker, David; Harding, Stephen; Heald, Gordon; Timms, Noel; Voas, David; Gari, Aikaterini; Georgas, James; Mylonas, Kostas; Hankiss, Elemer; Manchin, Robert; Rosta, Gergely; Tomka, Miklós; Haraldsson, Olafur; Jónsson, Fridrik H.; Olafsson, Stefan; Breen, Michael; Fahey, Tony; Fogarty, Michael; Kennedy, Kieran; Sinnott, Richard; Whelan, Chris; Abbruzzese, Salvatore; Calvaruso, Claudio; Gubert, Renzo; Rovati, Giancarlo; Zepa, Brigita; Alisauskiene, Rasa; Juknevicius, Stanislovas; Ziliukaite, Ruta; Estgen, Pol; Hausman, Pierre; Legrand, Michel; Petkovska, Antoanela; Abela, Anthony M.; Cachia-Caruana, Richard; Inganuez, Fr. Joe; Troisi, Joseph; Petruti, Doru; Besic, Milos; Arts, Wil A.; de Moor, Ruud; European Values Study; Hagenaars, Jacques A.P.; Halman, Loek; Luijkx, Ruud; Hayes, Bernadette C.; Smith, Alan; Listhaug, Ola; Jasinska-Kania, Aleksandra; Konieczna, Joanna; Marody, Mira; Cabral, Manuel Villaverde; Franca, Luis de; Ramos, Alice; Vala, Jorge; Pop, Lucien; Voicu, Malina; Zamfir, Catalin; Bashkirova, Elena; Gredelj, Stjepan; Kusá, Zuzana; Malnar, Brina; Tos, Niko; Elzo, Javier; Orizo, Francisco Andrés; Silvestre Cabrera, María; Bush, Karin; Lundasen, Susanne; Pettersson, Thorleif; Joye, Dominique; Esmer, Yilmaz; Balakireva, Olga; Inglehart, Ronald; Rosenberg, Florence; Sullivan, Edward
    Time period covered
    1981 - 2008
    Area covered
    Austria, Montenegro, Germany, Estonia, Belarus, Portugal, Norway, United States of America, Lithuania, Moldova
    Measurement technique
    EVS 2008: Face-to-face interviews with standardized questionnaire. In all countries, fieldwork was conducted on the basis of detailed and uniform instructions prepared by the EVS advisory groups. The EVS questionnaires were administered as face-to-face interviews in the appropriate national language(s). As far as the data capture is concerned, CAPI or PAPI was used in nearly all countries. Exceptions are Finland (internet panel) and Sweden (postal survey). The English basic questionnaire was translated into other languages by means of the questionnaire translation system WebTrans, a web-based translation platform designed by Gallup Europe. The whole translation process was closely monitored and quasi-automated documented (see EVS (2010): EVS 2008 Guidelines and Recommendations. GESIS-Technical Reports 2010/16. Retrieved from <a href=http://www.europeanvaluesstudy.eu/ target=_blank> EVS webpage </a>.EVS 1999: Face-to-face interviews with standardized questionnaire. In Iceland about a quarter of the respondents were interviewed by telephone. These were respondents in remote areas of the country.EVS 1990: Personal interview with standardized questionnaireEVS 1981: Personal interview with standardized questionnaire
    Description

    This study is no longer up to date. Please, use the new study ZA7504: EVS Trend File 1981-2017 – Sensitive Dataset . The latest data file is also recommended as an improved update for analyses due to the improvements and data revisions.

    Moral, religious, societal, political, work, and family values of Europeans. Compilation of the data sets from 1981, 1990, 1999, and 2008.

    The variable overview allows for comparisons of trend variables of the four EVS waves 1981, 1990, 1999, and 2008. In addition, comparisons of original question texts across the waves 1999 and 2008 are supported.

    Topics: 1. Perceptions of life: importance of work, family, friends and acquaintances, leisure time, politics and religion (in Sweden: service to others); frequency of political discussions with friends; happiness; self-assessment of own health; feelings of: excitement or interest, restlessness, pride because of compliments, loneliness, joy about completing a thing, boredom, feeling good, depressed or unhappy, managing everything, sadness because of criticism; feelings of the respondent at home: relaxation, anxiety, happiness, aggression or safety.

    1. Leisure: way of spending leisure time and definition of leisure; partners for leisure time: alone, with family, friends, at busy places, colleagues, people at churches or at sport and culture; frequency of political discussions with friends and political opinion leadership; memberships and unpaid work (volunteering) in: social welfare services, religious or church organisations, education, or cultural activities, trade unions, political parties, local political actions, human rights, environmental or peace movement, professional associations, youth work, sports clubs, women´s groups, voluntary associations concerned with health consumption or other groups; motives for volunteering; aversion to people with other setting; feelings of loneliness.

    2. Work: reasons for people to live in need; importance of selected aspects of occupational work; employment status; general work satisfaction; freedom of decision-making in the job; importance of work (work ethics, scale); important aspects of leisure time; attitude towards following instructions at work without criticism (obedience work); jobs scarce: give priority to nationals over foreigners as well as men over women in jobs, able bodied people over handicapped people and forced retirement for the elderly; satisfaction with the financial situation of the household and expected situation in a year.

    Work Environment: work orientation and aspects of job satisfaction; importance of selected characteristics of professional work: good pay, little pressure, job security, respectable activity, flexible working hours, ability to show initiative, a lot of vacation, meeting objectives, responsibility, interesting work, meeting one´s own skills, nice colleagues, good career opportunities, serving society, contact with people, good physical conditions of work and weekend leisure, looking forward to work after the weekend, pride of one´s work, family friendly, have a say, people treated equally; perceived exploitation in the workplace; general job satisfaction (scale); satisfaction with job security; use of paid days off: look for additional salaried work, training, meeting with friends and family, additional working against boredom, voluntary work, hobbies, running one´s own business, relaxation.

    1. Religion: deism or nihilism; opinion about good and evil in everyone; feel remorse; being worth risking life for: own country, life of another person, justice, freedom, peace, religion; individual or general clear guidelines for good and evil; religious denomination; current and former religious denomination; raised religiously; current frequency of church attendance and at the age of 12; importance of religious celebration at birth, marriage and funeral; self-assessment of religiousness; churches give adequate answers to moral questions, problems of family life, spiritual needs and social problems of the country; assessment of the importance of religion for the future; attitude towards the role of the Church in political issues (scale); belief in God, life after death, soul, hell, heaven, sin, telepathy, reincarnation, angels, devil, resurrection from the dead; stick to religion vs. explore different traditions; personal God versus spirit or life force; own way of connecting with the divine; interest in the sacred or the supernatural; attitude towards the existence of one true religion; importance of God in one´s life (10-point-scalometer); experience of comfort and strength from religion and belief; moments of prayer and meditation; frequency of prayers; approval or rejection of the single 10 bids by the respondents and most people; supernatural experiences: feeling of connection with someone far away, seeing events that happened far away, felt in touch with someone dead, proximity to a powerful life force, change in the way of...
  15. o

    Supplementary Materials For "Testing The Goodness Of The Evs Gender Role...

    • explore.openaire.eu
    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    • +1more
    Updated Mar 7, 2017
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Vera Lomazzi (2017). Supplementary Materials For "Testing The Goodness Of The Evs Gender Role Attitudes Scale" [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.375612
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 7, 2017
    Authors
    Vera Lomazzi
    Description

    The study proposes the results from an evaluation of the scale used by the European Values Study to measure attitudes towards gender roles.The scale included in this survey is widely used but its goodness has never been properly investigated. I tested its reliability in 26 countries and evaluated the stability of its factorial structure. The tests show that, differently from the previous waves, the same scale used in 2008 is not enough tenable and displays several configurations across countries. In considering the source of this instability, I address to the issue of a possible priming effect due to adjacent questions introduced in the last wave. This seems to be confirmed by the preliminary analyses presented. The files include supplementary results for background analyses performed for the manuscript "Testing the goodness of the EVS gender role attitudes scale" submitted to the journal Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique. One file reports the result from exploratory factor analyses run on the EVS 2008 scale with 7 and 8 items; the other one shows intermediate results from the stepwise regression models performed on the same scale from EVS 2008 and EVS 1999. Lomazzi, V. (2017). Testing the Goodness of the EVS Gender Role Attitudes Scale. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, Forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1177/0759106317710859

  16. n

    LISS panel > European Values Study 2017 > Additional measurement October...

    • narcis.nl
    Updated Oct 5, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Tim Reeskens (Tilburg University); Loek Halman (Tilburg University); Ruud Luijkx (Tilburg University) (2020). LISS panel > European Values Study 2017 > Additional measurement October 2020 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.17026/dans-zdv-jq7m
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 5, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    CentERdata
    Authors
    Tim Reeskens (Tilburg University); Loek Halman (Tilburg University); Ruud Luijkx (Tilburg University)
    Description

    This research aims to compare responses of the Dutch ‘European Values Study’ of 2017 with a part of the EVS administered during the coronavirus crisis. This was the second additional measurement about the situation during the coronavirus crisis. The first additional measurement about the situation during the coronavirus crisis was conducted in May 2020.

  17. g

    EVS Trend File 1981-2017 – Sensitive Dataset

    • dbk.gesis.org
    • da-ra.de
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Gedeshi, Ilir; Zulehner, Paul M.; Rotman, David; Titarenko, Larissa; Billiet, Jaak; Dobbelaere, Karel; Kerkhofs, Jan; Swyngedouw, Marc; Voyé, Liliane; Fotev, Georgy; Marinov, Mario; Raichev, Andrei; Stoychev, Kancho; Kielty, J.F.; Nevitte, Neil; Baloban, Stjepan; Baloban, Josip; Roudometof, Victor; Rabusic, Ladislav; Rehak, Jan; Gundelach, Peter; Petersen, E.; Riis, Ole; Röhme, Nils; Saar, Andrus; Lotti, Leila; Pehkonen, Juhani; Puranen, Bi; Riffault, Hélène; Stoetzel, Jean; Tchernia, Jean-François; Pachulia, Merab; Jagodzinski, Wolfgang; Klingemann, Hans-Dieter; Köcher, Renate; Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth; Anheier, Helmut; Barker, David; Harding, Stephen; Heald, Gordon; Timms, Noel; Voas, David; Gari, Aikaterini; Georgas, James; Mylonas, Kostas; Hankiss, Elemer; Manchin, Robert; Rosta, Gergely; Tomka, Miklós; Haraldsson, Olafur; Jónsson, Fridrik H.; Olafsson, Stefan; Breen, Michael; Fahey, Tony; Fogarty, Michael; Kennedy, Kieran; Sinnott, Richard; Whelan, Chris; Abbruzzese, Salvatore; Calvaruso, Claudio; Gubert, Renzo; Rovati, Giancarlo; Zepa, Brigita; Alisauskiene, Rasa; Juknevicius, Stanislovas; Ziliukaite, Ruta; Estgen, Pol; Hausman, Pierre; Legrand, Michel; Petkovska, Antoanela; Abela, Anthony M.; Cachia-Caruana, Richard; Inganuez, Fr. Joe; Troisi, Joseph; Petruti, Doru; Besic, Milos; Arts, Wil A.; de Moor, Ruud; European Values Study; Hagenaars, Jacques A.P.; Halman, Loek; Luijkx, Ruud; Hayes, Bernadette C.; Smith, Alan; Listhaug, Ola; Jasinska-Kania, Aleksandra; Konieczna, Joanna; Marody, Mira; Cabral, Manuel Villaverde; Franca, Luis de; Ramos, Alice; Vala, Jorge; Pop, Lucien; Voicu, Malina; Zamfir, Catalin; Bashkirova, Elena; Gredelj, Stjepan; Kusá, Zuzana; Malnar, Brina; Tos, Niko; Elzo, Javier; Orizo, Francisco Andrés; Silvestre Cabrera, María; Bush, Karin; Wallman-Lundåsen, Susanne; Pettersson, Thorleif; Joye, Dominique; Esmer, Yilmaz; Balakireva, Olga; Inglehart, Ronald; Rosenberg, Florence; Sullivan, Edward; Pachulia, Merab; Poghosyan, Gevorg; Kritzinger, Sylvia; Kolenović-Đapo, Jadranka; Baloban, Josip; Frederiksen, Morten; Saar, Erki; Ketola, Kimmo; Wolf, Christof; Pachulia, Merab; Bréchon, Pierre; Jónsdóttir, Guðbjörg A.; Komar, Olivera; Reeskens, Tim; Jenssen, Anders T.; Soboleva, Natalia; Voicu, Bogdan; Strapcová, Katarina; Bešić, Miloš; Uhan, Samo; Ernst Stähli, Michèle, EVS Trend File 1981-2017 – Sensitive Dataset [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.4232/1.13094
    Explore at:
    Dataset provided by
    GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences
    Authors
    Gedeshi, Ilir; Zulehner, Paul M.; Rotman, David; Titarenko, Larissa; Billiet, Jaak; Dobbelaere, Karel; Kerkhofs, Jan; Swyngedouw, Marc; Voyé, Liliane; Fotev, Georgy; Marinov, Mario; Raichev, Andrei; Stoychev, Kancho; Kielty, J.F.; Nevitte, Neil; Baloban, Stjepan; Baloban, Josip; Roudometof, Victor; Rabusic, Ladislav; Rehak, Jan; Gundelach, Peter; Petersen, E.; Riis, Ole; Röhme, Nils; Saar, Andrus; Lotti, Leila; Pehkonen, Juhani; Puranen, Bi; Riffault, Hélène; Stoetzel, Jean; Tchernia, Jean-François; Pachulia, Merab; Jagodzinski, Wolfgang; Klingemann, Hans-Dieter; Köcher, Renate; Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth; Anheier, Helmut; Barker, David; Harding, Stephen; Heald, Gordon; Timms, Noel; Voas, David; Gari, Aikaterini; Georgas, James; Mylonas, Kostas; Hankiss, Elemer; Manchin, Robert; Rosta, Gergely; Tomka, Miklós; Haraldsson, Olafur; Jónsson, Fridrik H.; Olafsson, Stefan; Breen, Michael; Fahey, Tony; Fogarty, Michael; Kennedy, Kieran; Sinnott, Richard; Whelan, Chris; Abbruzzese, Salvatore; Calvaruso, Claudio; Gubert, Renzo; Rovati, Giancarlo; Zepa, Brigita; Alisauskiene, Rasa; Juknevicius, Stanislovas; Ziliukaite, Ruta; Estgen, Pol; Hausman, Pierre; Legrand, Michel; Petkovska, Antoanela; Abela, Anthony M.; Cachia-Caruana, Richard; Inganuez, Fr. Joe; Troisi, Joseph; Petruti, Doru; Besic, Milos; Arts, Wil A.; de Moor, Ruud; European Values Study; Hagenaars, Jacques A.P.; Halman, Loek; Luijkx, Ruud; Hayes, Bernadette C.; Smith, Alan; Listhaug, Ola; Jasinska-Kania, Aleksandra; Konieczna, Joanna; Marody, Mira; Cabral, Manuel Villaverde; Franca, Luis de; Ramos, Alice; Vala, Jorge; Pop, Lucien; Voicu, Malina; Zamfir, Catalin; Bashkirova, Elena; Gredelj, Stjepan; Kusá, Zuzana; Malnar, Brina; Tos, Niko; Elzo, Javier; Orizo, Francisco Andrés; Silvestre Cabrera, María; Bush, Karin; Wallman-Lundåsen, Susanne; Pettersson, Thorleif; Joye, Dominique; Esmer, Yilmaz; Balakireva, Olga; Inglehart, Ronald; Rosenberg, Florence; Sullivan, Edward; Pachulia, Merab; Poghosyan, Gevorg; Kritzinger, Sylvia; Kolenović-Đapo, Jadranka; Baloban, Josip; Frederiksen, Morten; Saar, Erki; Ketola, Kimmo; Wolf, Christof; Pachulia, Merab; Bréchon, Pierre; Jónsdóttir, Guðbjörg A.; Komar, Olivera; Reeskens, Tim; Jenssen, Anders T.; Soboleva, Natalia; Voicu, Bogdan; Strapcová, Katarina; Bešić, Miloš; Uhan, Samo; Ernst Stähli, Michèle
    License

    https://dbk.gesis.org/dbksearch/sdesc2.asp?no=7504https://dbk.gesis.org/dbksearch/sdesc2.asp?no=7504

    Description

    Study number; version; Digital Object Identifier, EVS-wave; country (ISO 3166-1 Numeric code); original respondent number; unified respondent number; country (ISO 3166-1 Alpha-2 code); country - wave; job profession/industry (3-digit ISCO88) - spouse/part

  18. f

    Variables.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 16, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Syed Muhammad Usman Masood; Rasim Özcan; Asad ul Islam Khan (2023). Variables. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282072.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 16, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Syed Muhammad Usman Masood; Rasim Özcan; Asad ul Islam Khan
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Economic interventions have social consequences. In this paper, we explore one such relationship, between microfinance intensity and social distrust levels reported by the low-income people. We find a significant association between microfinance intensity in a country and distrust among the poor as well as ultra-poor in cross-section using World Values Survey & European Values Survey (WVS-EVS) Wave 7 (2017–2022). We supplement these findings using empirical Bayes on a panel extending back from 7th to the 4th WVS wave (1999–2004). To deal with potential endogeneity, we run 2SLS as well as weak instruments-robust conditional instrumental variable tests and find evidence showing microfinance prevalence intensity affects distrust levels among the poor and ultra-poor households. We find no association between microfinance and distrust levels in the rich in any of the tests, potentially because the rich are not exposed to microfinance.

  19. c

    European Values Study 2017: Romania - Hungarian minority (EVS 2017 Country...

    • datacatalogue.cessda.eu
    • search.gesis.org
    • +1more
    Updated Mar 15, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Kiss. Tamás; Székely, István G. (2023). European Values Study 2017: Romania - Hungarian minority (EVS 2017 Country data file) [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.4232/1.13562
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 15, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Romanian Institute for Research on National Minorities, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
    Authors
    Kiss. Tamás; Székely, István G.
    Time period covered
    Nov 23, 2019 - Mar 13, 2020
    Area covered
    Rumänien
    Measurement technique
    Persönliches Interview : Papier-und-Bleistift (PAPI)
    Description

    Die European Values Study ist ein groß angelegtes, länderübergreifendes und längsschnittliches Umfrage-Forschungsprogramm zu der Frage, wie Europäer über Familie, Arbeit, Religion, Politik und Gesellschaft denken. Die Umfrage wird alle neun Jahre in einer wachsenden Zahl von Ländern wiederholt und bietet Einblicke in die Ideen, Überzeugungen, Präferenzen, Einstellungen, Werte und Meinungen der Bürger in ganz Europa.

    Wie die vorhergehenden Erhebungen in den Jahren 1981, 1990, 1999 und 2008 konzentriert sich auch die fünfte EVS-Welle weiterhin auf ein breites Spektrum von Werten. Die Fragen sind zwischen den Wellen und Regionen in hohem Maße vergleichbar, so dass sich der EVS für Forschungsarbeiten zur Untersuchung von Trends im Zeitverlauf eignet.

    Mit der neuen Welle wurden die methodischen Standards gestärkt. Das full release des EVS 2017 enthält Daten und Dokumentationen von insgesamt 37 teilnehmenden Ländern. Weitere Informationen finden Sie auf der Website des EVS.

    Moralische, religiöse, gesellschaftliche, politische, berufliche und familiäre Werte der Europäer.

    Die Themen: 1. Wahrnehmungen des Lebens: Bedeutung von Arbeit, Familie, Freunden und Bekannten, Freizeit, Politik und Religion; Glück; Selbsteinschätzung der eigenen Gesundheit; Mitgliedschaften in Freiwilligenorganisationen (religiöse oder kirchliche Organisationen, kulturelle Aktivitäten, Gewerkschaften, politische Parteien oder Gruppen, Umwelt, Ökologie, Tierrechte, Berufsverbände, Sport, Freizeit oder andere Gruppen, keine); aktive oder inaktive Mitgliedschaft in humanitären oder karitativen Organisationen, Verbraucherorganisationen, Selbsthilfegruppen oder gegenseitige Unterstützung; Freiwilligenarbeit in den letzten sechs Monaten; Toleranz gegenüber Minderheiten (Menschen anderer Rassen, starke Trinker, Einwanderer, Ausländer, Drogenabhängige, Homosexuelle, Christen, Muslime, Juden und Zigeuner - soziale Distanz); Vertrauen in Menschen; Einschätzung von fairem und hilfsbereitem Verhaltens; interne oder externe Kontrolle; Lebenszufriedenheit; Bedeutung von Bildungszielen: wünschenswerte Eigenschaften von Kindern.

    1. Arbeit: Einstellung zur Arbeit (die Arbeit ist notwendig, um Talente zu entwickeln, Geld zu erhalten, ohne zu arbeiten, ist erniedrigend, Menschen werden faul, wenn sie nicht arbeiten, Arbeit ist eine Pflicht gegenüber der Gesellschaft, Arbeit steht immer an erster Stelle); Bedeutung ausgewählter Aspekte der beruflichen Arbeit; Vorrang von Einheimischen vor Ausländern sowie Männern vor Frauen im Job.

    2. Religion und Moral: Religionszugehörigkeit; Kirchgangshäufigkeit derzeit und im Alter von 12 Jahren; Selbsteinschätzung der Religiosität; Glaube an Gott, Leben nach dem Tod, Hölle, Himmel und Reinkarnation; persönlicher Gott vs. Geist oder Lebenskraft; Bedeutung Gottes im eigenen Leben (10-Punkte-Skala); Häufigkeit von Gebeten; Moralvorstellungen (Skala: Inanspruchnahme staatlicher Leistungen ohne Anspruch, Steuerbetrug, Einnahme weicher Drogen, Annehmen von Bestechungsgeldern, Homosexualität, Abtreibung, Scheidung, Sterbehilfe, Selbstmord, Barzahlung zur Steuerumgehung, Gelegenheitssex, Schwarzfahren in öffentlichen Verkehrsmitteln, Prostitution, In-vitro-Fertilisation, politische Gewalt, Todesstrafe); Religiosität; Beziehung zum Übernatürlichen ohne Kirche oder Religion; Glaube an Talismane und Glück bringende Gegenstände, Teilnahme an Aktivitäten von Gruppen, die innerhalb der Kirche oder Gemeinde stattfinden (wie Gebetsgruppen, Bibelstudiengruppen, Vereinigungen der Gläubigen usw.); gegenwärtig eine offizielle Position innerhalb der Kirche oder Gemeinde innehaben (Kirchenrat, Presbyter, Pfarrer, Priester usw.).

    3. Familie: Vertrauen in die Familie; wichtigste Kriterien für eine erfolgreiche Ehe oder Partnerschaft (Treue, angemessenes Einkommen, gute Wohnverhältnisse, gemeinsame Hausarbeit, Kinder, Zeit für Freunde und persönliche Hobbys); die Ehe ist eine veraltete Institution; Einstellung zum traditionellen Verständnis der Rolle von Mann und Frau in Beruf und Familie (Geschlechterrollen); homosexuelle Paare sind genauso gute Eltern wie andere Paare; Verpflichtung gegenüber der Gesellschaft, Kinder zu haben; Verantwortung erwachsener Kinder für ihre Eltern, wenn sie pflegebedürftig sind; Hauptziel im Leben die eigenen Eltern stolz zu machen.

    4. Politik und Gesellschaft: Politikinteresse; Präferenz für individuelle Freiheit oder soziale Gleichheit; Selbsteinschätzung auf einem Links-Rechts-Kontinuum (10-Punkte-Skala); individuelle vs. staatliche Versorgungsverantwortung; jede Arbeit annehmen vs. Recht, eine Arbeit abzulehnen, wenn arbeitslos; Wettbewerb gut vs. schädlich für die Menschen; gleiches Einkommen vs. Anreize für individuelle Anstrengung; privates vs. staatliches Eigentum an Wirtschaft und Industrie; Postmaterialismus (Skala); wichtigste Ziele des Landes für die nächsten zehn Jahre; Bereitschaft, für das Land zu kämpfen; Erwartung der zukünftigen Entwicklung (weniger Bedeutung der Arbeit und mehr Respekt vor...

  20. f

    S1 Data -

    • plos.figshare.com
    xlsx
    Updated Jun 16, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Syed Muhammad Usman Masood; Rasim Özcan; Asad ul Islam Khan (2023). S1 Data - [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282072.s003
    Explore at:
    xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 16, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Syed Muhammad Usman Masood; Rasim Özcan; Asad ul Islam Khan
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Economic interventions have social consequences. In this paper, we explore one such relationship, between microfinance intensity and social distrust levels reported by the low-income people. We find a significant association between microfinance intensity in a country and distrust among the poor as well as ultra-poor in cross-section using World Values Survey & European Values Survey (WVS-EVS) Wave 7 (2017–2022). We supplement these findings using empirical Bayes on a panel extending back from 7th to the 4th WVS wave (1999–2004). To deal with potential endogeneity, we run 2SLS as well as weak instruments-robust conditional instrumental variable tests and find evidence showing microfinance prevalence intensity affects distrust levels among the poor and ultra-poor households. We find no association between microfinance and distrust levels in the rich in any of the tests, potentially because the rich are not exposed to microfinance.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Gedeshi, Ilir; Pachulia, Merab; Poghosyan, Gevorg; Rotman, David; Kritzinger, Sylvia; Fotev, Georgy; Kolenović-Đapo, Jadranka; Baloban, Josip; Baloban, Stjepan; Rabušic, Ladislav; Frederiksen, Morten; Saar, Erki; Ketola, Kimmo; Wolf, Christof; Pachulia, Merab; Bréchon, Pierre; Voas, David; Rosta, Gergely; Jónsdóttir, Guðbjörg A.; Rovati, Giancarlo; Ziliukaite, Ruta; Petkovska, Antoanela; Komar, Olivera; Reeskens, Tim; Jenssen, Anders T.; Soboleva, Natalia; Marody, Mirosława; Voicu, Bogdan; Strapcová, Katarina; Bešić, Miloš; Uhan, Samo; Silvestre Cabrera, María; Wallman-Lundåsen, Susanne; Ernst Stähli, Michèle; Ramos, Alice; Balakireva, Olga; Mieriņa, Inta (2022). European Values Study 2017: Integrated Dataset (EVS 2017) [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.4232/1.13897

European Values Study 2017: Integrated Dataset (EVS 2017)

Explore at:
122 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
(12272043), (9726384)Available download formats
Dataset updated
May 16, 2022
Dataset provided by
GESIS search
GESIS
Authors
Gedeshi, Ilir; Pachulia, Merab; Poghosyan, Gevorg; Rotman, David; Kritzinger, Sylvia; Fotev, Georgy; Kolenović-Đapo, Jadranka; Baloban, Josip; Baloban, Stjepan; Rabušic, Ladislav; Frederiksen, Morten; Saar, Erki; Ketola, Kimmo; Wolf, Christof; Pachulia, Merab; Bréchon, Pierre; Voas, David; Rosta, Gergely; Jónsdóttir, Guðbjörg A.; Rovati, Giancarlo; Ziliukaite, Ruta; Petkovska, Antoanela; Komar, Olivera; Reeskens, Tim; Jenssen, Anders T.; Soboleva, Natalia; Marody, Mirosława; Voicu, Bogdan; Strapcová, Katarina; Bešić, Miloš; Uhan, Samo; Silvestre Cabrera, María; Wallman-Lundåsen, Susanne; Ernst Stähli, Michèle; Ramos, Alice; Balakireva, Olga; Mieriņa, Inta
License

https://www.gesis.org/en/institute/data-usage-termshttps://www.gesis.org/en/institute/data-usage-terms

Time period covered
Jun 19, 2017 - Oct 1, 2021
Variables measured
year - survey year, dweight - Design Weight, v225 - sex respondent (Q63), studyno - GESIS study number, gweight - Calibration weights, mode - mode of data collection, doi - Digital Object Identifier, v277 - date of interview (Q107), version - GESIS archive version, pweight - Population size weight, and 464 more
Description

The European Values Study is a large-scale, cross-national and longitudinal survey research program on how Europeans think about family, work, religion, politics, and society. Repeated every nine years in an increasing number of countries, the survey provides insights into the ideas, beliefs, preferences, attitudes, values, and opinions of citizens all over Europe.

As previous waves conducted in 1981, 1990, 1999, 2008, the fifth EVS wave maintains a persistent focus on a broad range of values. Questions are highly comparable across waves and regions, making EVS suitable for research aimed at studying trends over time.

The new wave has seen a strengthening of the methodological standards. The full release of the EVS 2017 includes data and documentation of altogether 37 participating countries. For more information, please go to the EVS website.

Morale, religious, societal, political, work, and family values of Europeans.

Topics: 1. Perceptions of life: importance of work, family, friends and acquaintances, leisure time, politics and religion; happiness; self-assessment of own health; memberships in voluntary organisations (religious or church organisations, cultural activities, trade unions, political parties or groups, environment, ecology, animal rights, professional associations, sports, recreation, or other groups, none); active or inactive membership of humanitarian or charitable organisation, consumer organisation, self-help group or mutual aid; voluntary work in the last six months; tolerance towards minorities (people of a different race, heavy drinkers, immigrants, foreign workers, drug addicts, homosexuals, Christians, Muslims, Jews, and gypsies - social distance); trust in people; estimation of people´s fair and helpful behavior; internal or external control; satisfaction with life; importance of educational goals: desirable qualities of children.

  1. Work: attitude towards work (job needed to develop talents, receiving money without working is humiliating, people turn lazy not working, work is a duty towards society, work always comes first); importance of selected aspects of occupational work; give priority to nationals over foreigners as well as men over women in jobs.

  2. Religion and morale: religious denomination; current and former religious denomination; current frequency of church attendance and at the age of 12; self-assessment of religiousness; belief in God, life after death, hell, heaven, and re-incarnation; personal god vs. spirit or life force; importance of God in one´s life (10-point-scale); frequency of prayers; morale attitudes (scale: claiming state benefits without entitlement, cheating on taxes, taking soft drugs, accepting a bribe, homosexuality, abortion, divorce, euthanasia, suicide, paying cash to avoid taxes, casual sex, avoiding fare on public transport, prostitution, in-vitro fertilization, political violence, death penalty).

  3. Family: trust in family; most important criteria for a successful marriage or partnership (faithfulness, adequate income, good housing, sharing household chores, children, time for friends and personal hobbies); marriage is an outdated institution; attitude towards traditional understanding of one´s role of man and woman in occupation and family (gender roles); homosexual couples are as good parents as other couples; duty towards society to have children; responsibility of adult children for their parents when they are in need of long-term care; to make own parents proud is a main goal in life.

  4. Politics and society: political interest; political participation; preference for individual freedom or social equality; self-assessment on a left-right continuum (10-point-scale) (left-right self-placement); individual vs. state responsibility for providing; take any job vs. right to refuse job when unemployed; competition good vs. harmful for people; equal incomes vs. incentives for individual effort; private vs. government ownership of business and industry; postmaterialism (scale); most important aims of the country for the next ten years; willingness to fight for the country; expectation of future development (less importance placed on work and greater respect for authority); trust in institutions; essential characteristics of democracy; importance of democracy for the respondent; rating democracy in own country; satisfaction with the political system in the country; preferred type of political system (strong leader, expert decisions, army should ...

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu