Data Dictionary template for Tempe Open Data.

The Pesticide Data Program (PDP) is a national pesticide residue database program. Through cooperation with State agriculture departments and other Federal agencies, PDP manages the collection, analysis, data entry, and reporting of pesticide residues on agricultural commodities in the U.S. food supply, with an emphasis on those commodities highly consumed by infants and children.This dataset provides information on where each tested sample was collected, where the product originated from, what type of product it was, and what residues were found on the product, for calendar years 1992 through 2023. The data can measure residues of individual compounds and classes of compounds, as well as provide information about the geographic distribution of the origin of samples, from growers, packers and distributors. The dataset also includes information on where the samples were taken, what laboratory was used to test them, and all testing procedures (by sample, so can be linked to the compound that is identified). The dataset also contains a reference variable for each compound that denotes the limit of detection for a pesticide/commodity pair (LOD variable). The metadata also includes EPA tolerance levels or action levels for each pesticide/commodity pair. The dataset will be updated on a continual basis, with a new resource data file added annually after the PDP calendar-year survey data is released.Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: CSV Data Dictionary for PDP.File Name: PDP_DataDictionary.csv. Resource Description: Machine-readable Comma Separated Values (CSV) format data dictionary for PDP Database Zip files. Defines variables for the sample identity and analytical results data tables/files. The ## characters in the Table and Text Data File name refer to the 2-digit year for the PDP survey, like 97 for 1997 or 01 for 2001. For details on table linking, see PDF. Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/excelResource Title: Data dictionary for Pesticide Data Program. File Name: PDP DataDictionary.pdf. Resource Description: Data dictionary for PDP Database Zip files. Resource Software Recommended: Adobe Acrobat, url: https://www.adobe.comResource Title: 2023 PDP Database Zip File. File Name: 2023PDPDatabase.zipResource Title: 2022 PDP Database Zip File. File Name: 2022PDPDatabase.zipResource Title: 2021 PDP Database Zip File. File Name: 2021PDPDatabase.zipResource Title: 2020 PDP Database Zip File. File Name: 2020PDPDatabase.zipResource Title: 2019 PDP Database Zip File. File Name: 2019PDPDatabase.zipResource Title: 2018 PDP Database Zip File. File Name: 2018PDPDatabase.zipResource Title: 2017 PDP Database Zip File. File Name: 2017PDPDatabase.zipResource Title: 2016 PDP Database Zip File. File Name: 2016PDPDatabase.zipResource Title: 2015 PDP Database Zip File. File Name: 2015PDPDatabase.zipResource Title: 2014 PDP Database Zip File. File Name: 2014PDPDatabase.zipResource Title: 2013 PDP Database Zip File. File Name: 2013PDPDatabase.zipResource Title: 2012 PDP Database Zip File. File Name: 2012PDPDatabase.zipResource Title: 2011 PDP Database Zip File. File Name: 2011PDPDatabase.zipResource Title: 2010 PDP Database Zip File. File Name: 2010PDPDatabase.zipResource Title: 2009 PDP Database Zip File. File Name: 2009PDPDatabase.zipResource Title: 2008 PDP Database Zip File. File Name: 2008PDPDatabase.zipResource Title: 2007 PDP Database Zip File. File Name: 2007PDPDatabase.zipResource Title: 2006 PDP Database Zip File. File Name: 2006PDPDatabase.zipResource Title: 2005 PDP Database Zip File. File Name: 2005PDPDatabase.zipResource Title: 2004 PDP Database Zip File. File Name: 2004PDPDatabase.zipResource Title: 2003 PDP Database Zip File. File Name: 2003PDPDatabase.zipResource Title: 2002 PDP Database Zip File. File Name: 2002PDPDatabase.zipResource Title: 2001 PDP Database Zip File. File Name: 2001PDPDatabase.zipResource Title: 2000 PDP Database Zip File. File Name: 2000PDPDatabase.zipResource Title: 1999 PDP Database Zip File. File Name: 1999PDPDatabase.zipResource Title: 1998 PDP Database Zip File. File Name: 1998PDPDatabase.zipResource Title: 1997 PDP Database Zip File. File Name: 1997PDPDatabase.zipResource Title: 1996 PDP Database Zip File. File Name: 1996PDPDatabase.zipResource Title: 1995 PDP Database Zip File. File Name: 1995PDPDatabase.zipResource Title: 1994 PDP Database Zip File. File Name: 1994PDPDatabase.zipResource Title: 1993 PDP Database Zip File. File Name: 1993PDPDatabase.zipResource Title: 1992 PDP Database Zip File. File Name: 1992PDPDatabase.zip

This data includes the location of cooling towers registered with New York State. The data is self-reported by owners/property managers of cooling towers in service in New York State. In August 2015 the New York State Department of Health released emergency regulations requiring the owners of cooling towers to register them with New York State. In addition the regulation includes requirements: regular inspection; annual certification; obtaining and implementing a maintenance plan; record keeping; reporting of certain information; and sample collection and culture testing. All cooling towers in New York State, including New York City, need to be registered in the NYS system. Registration is done through an electronic database found at: www.ny.gov/services/register-cooling-tower-and-submit-reports. For more information, check http://www.health.ny.gov/diseases/communicable/legionellosis/, or go to the “About” tab.

This data dictionary describes most of the possible output options given in the Probe for EPMA software package developed by Probe Software. Examples of the data output options include sample identification, analytical conditions, elemental weight percents, atomic percents, detection limits, and stage coordinates. Many more options are available and the data that is output will depend upon the end use.

Each feature within this dataset is the authoritative representation of the location of a sample within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) Environmental Database. The dataset includes sample locations from Puerto Rico to Alaska, with point features representing different types of sample locations such as boreholes, wells, geoprobes, etc. All sample locations are maintained within the LM Environmental Database, with feature attributes defined within the associated data dictionary.

We study the behaviour and cognition of wild apes and other species (elephants, corvids, dogs). Our video archive is called the Great Ape Dictionary, you can find out more here www.greatapedictionary.com or about our lab group here www.wildminds.ac.uk We consider these videos to be a data ark that we would like to make as accessible as possible. While we are unable to make the original video files open access at the present time you can search this database to explore what is available, and then request access for collaborations of different kinds by contacting us directly or through our website. We label all videos in the Great Ape Dictionary video archive with basic meta-data on the location, date, duration, individuals present, and behaviour present. Version 1.0.0 contains current data from the Budongo East African chimpanzee population (n=13806 videos). These datasets are being updated regularly and new data will be incorporated here with versioning. As well as the database there is a second read.me file which contains the ethograms used for each variable coded, and a short summary of other datasets that are in preparation for subsequent version(s). If you are interested in these data please contact us. Please note that not all variables are labeled for all videos, the detailed Ethogram categories are only available for a subset of data. All videos are labelled with up to 5 Contexts (at least one, rarely 5). If you are interested in finding a good example video for a particular behaviour, search for 'Library' = Y, this indicates that this clip contains a very clear example of the behaviour.

This is Oxford University Press's most comprehensive single-volume dictionary, with 170,000 entries covering all varieties of English worldwide. The NODE data set constitutes a fully integrated range of formal data types suitable for language engineering and NLP applications: It is available in XML or SGML. - Source dictionary data. The NODE data set includes all the information present in the New Oxford Dictionary of English itself, such as definition text, example sentences, grammatical indicators, and encyclopaedic material. - Morphological data. Each NODE lemma (both headwords and subentries) has a full listing of all possible syntactic forms (e.g. plurals for nouns, inflections for verbs, comparatives and superlatives for adjectives), tagged to show their syntactic relationships. Each form has an IPA pronunciation. Full morphological data is also given for spelling variants (e.g. typical American variants), and a system of links enables straightforward correlation of variant forms to standard forms. The data set thus provides robust support for all look-up routines, and is equally viable for applications dealing with American and British English. - Phrases and idioms. The NODE data set provides a rich and flexible codification of over 10,000 phrasal verbs and other multi-word phrases. It features comprehensive lexical resources enabling applications to identify a phrase not only in the form listed in the dictionary but also in a range of real-world variations, including alternative wording, variable syntactic patterns, inflected verbs, optional determiners, etc. - Subject classification. Using a categorization scheme of 200 key domains, over 80,000 words and senses have been associated with particular subject areas, from aeronautics to zoology. As well as facilitating the extraction of subject-specific sub-lexicons, this also provides an extensive resource for document categorization and information retrieval. - Semantic relationships. The relationships between every noun and noun sense in the dictionary are being codified using an extensive semantic taxonomy on the model of the Princeton WordNet project. (Mapping to WordNet 1.7 is supported.) This structure allows elements of the basic lexical database to function as a formal knowledge database, enabling functionality such as sense disambiguation and logical inference. - Derived from the detailed and authoritative corpus-based research of Oxford University Press's lexicographic team, the NODE data set is a powerful asset for any task dealing with real-world contemporary English usage. By integrating a number of different data types into a single structure, it creates a coherent resource which can be queried along numerous axes, allowing open-ended exploitation by many kinds of language-related applications.

Data here contain and describe an open-source structured query language (SQLite) portable database containing high resolution mass spectrometry data (MS1 and MS2) for per- and polyfluorinated alykl substances (PFAS) and associated metadata regarding their measurement techniques, quality assurance metrics, and the samples from which they were produced. These data are stored in a format adhering to the Database Infrastructure for Mass Spectrometry (DIMSpec) project. That project produces and uses databases like this one, providing a complete toolkit for non-targeted analysis. See more information about the full DIMSpec code base - as well as these data for demonstration purposes - at GitHub (https://github.com/usnistgov/dimspec) or view the full User Guide for DIMSpec (https://pages.nist.gov/dimspec/docs). Files of most interest contained here include the database file itself (dimspec_nist_pfas.sqlite) as well as an entity relationship diagram (ERD.png) and data dictionary (DIMSpec for PFAS_1.0.1.20230615_data_dictionary.json) to elucidate the database structure and assist in interpretation and use.

Adventure Works 2022 Denormalized dataset

How this Dataset is created?

The CSV data was sourced from the existing Kaggle dataset titled "Adventure Works 2022" by Algorismus. This data was normalized and consisted of seven individual CSV files. The Sales table served as a fact table that connected to other dimensions. To consolidate all the data into a single table, it was loaded into a SQLite database and transformed accordingly. The final denormalized table was then exported as a single CSV file (delimited by | ), and the column names were updated to follow snake_case style.

DOI

doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27899706

Data Dictionary

During hydrocarbon production, water is typically co-produced from the geologic formations producing oil and gas. Understanding the composition of these produced waters is important to help investigate the regional hydrogeology, the source of the water, the efficacy of water treatment and disposal plans, potential economic benefits of mineral commodities in the fluids, and the safety of potential sources of drinking or agricultural water. In addition to waters co-produced with hydrocarbons, geothermal development or exploration brings deep formation waters to the surface for possible sampling. This U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Produced Waters Geochemical Database, which contains geochemical and other information for 114,943 produced water and other deep formation water samples of the United States, is a provisional, updated version of the 2002 USGS Produced Waters Database (Breit and others, 2002). In addition to the major element data presented in the original, the new database contains trace elements, isotopes, and time-series data, as well as nearly 100,000 additional samples that provide greater spatial coverage from both conventional and unconventional reservoir types, including geothermal. The database is a compilation of 40 individual databases, publications, or reports. The database was created in a manner to facilitate addition of new data and correct any compilation errors, and is expected to be updated over time with new data as provided and needed. Table 1, USGSPWDBv2.3 Data Sources.csv, shows the abbreviated ID of each input database (IDDB), the number of samples from each, and its reference. Table 2, USGSPWDBv2.3 Data Dictionary.csv, defines the 190 variables contained in the database and their descriptions. The database variables are organized first with identification and location information, followed by well descriptions, dates, rock properties, physical properties of the water, and then chemistry. The chemistry is organized alphabetically by elemental symbol. Each element is followed by any associated compounds (e.g. H2S is found after S). After Zr, molecules containing carbon, organic 9 compounds and dissolved gases follow. Isotopic data are found at the end of the dataset, just before the culling parameters.

PETROG, AGSO's Petrography Database, is a relational computer database of petrographic data obtained from microscopic examination of thin sections of rock samples. The database is designed for petrographic descriptions of crystalline igneous and metamorphic rocks, and also for sedimentary petrography. A variety of attributes pertaining to thin sections can be recorded, as can the volume proportions of component minerals, clasts and matrix.

PETROG is one of a family of field and laboratory databases that include mineral deposits, regolith, rock chemistry, geochronology, stream-sediment geochemistry, geophysical rock properties and ground spectral properties for remote sensing. All these databases rely on a central Field Database for information on geographic location, outcrops and rock samples. PETROG depends, in particular, on the Field Database's SITES and ROCKS tables, as well as a number of lookup tables of standard terms. ROCKMINSITES, a flat view of PETROG's tables combined with the SITES and ROCKS tables, allows thin-section and mineral data to be accessed from geographic information systems and plotted on maps.

This guide presents an overview of PETROG's infrastructure and describes in detail the menus and screen forms used to input and view the data. In particular, the definitions of most fields in the database are given in some depth under descriptions of the screen forms - providing, in effect, a comprehensive data dictionary of the database. The database schema, with all definitions of tables, views and indexes is contained in an appendix to the guide.

The open data portal catalogue is a downloadable dataset containing some key metadata for the general datasets available on the Government of Canada's Open Data portal. Resource 1 is generated using the ckanapi tool (external link) Resources 2 - 8 are generated using the Flatterer (external link) utility. ###Description of resources: 1. Dataset is a JSON Lines (external link) file where the metadata of each Dataset/Open Information Record is one line of JSON. The file is compressed with GZip. The file is heavily nested and recommended for users familiar with working with nested JSON. 2. Catalogue is a XLSX workbook where the nested metadata of each Dataset/Open Information Record is flattened into worksheets for each type of metadata. 3. datasets metadata contains metadata at the dataset level. This is also referred to as the package in some CKAN documentation. This is the main table/worksheet in the SQLite database and XLSX output. 4. Resources Metadata contains the metadata for the resources contained within each dataset. 5. resource views metadata contains the metadata for the views applied to each resource, if a resource has a view configured. 6. datastore fields metadata contains the DataStore information for CSV datasets that have been loaded into the DataStore. This information is displayed in the Data Dictionary for DataStore enabled CSVs. 7. Data Package Fields contains a description of the fields available in each of the tables within the Catalogue, as well as the count of the number of records each table contains. 8. data package entity relation diagram Displays the title and format for column, in each table in the Data Package in the form of a ERD Diagram. The Data Package resource offers a text based version. 9. SQLite Database is a .db database, similar in structure to Catalogue. This can be queried with database or analytical software tools for doing analysis.

The dataset, Survey-SR, provides the nutrient data for assessing dietary intakes from the national survey What We Eat In America, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (WWEIA, NHANES). Historically, USDA databases have been used for national nutrition monitoring (1). Currently, the Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies (FNDDS) (2), is used by Food Surveys Research Group, ARS, to process dietary intake data from WWEIA, NHANES. Nutrient values for FNDDS are based on Survey-SR. Survey-SR was referred to as the "Primary Data Set" in older publications. Early versions of the dataset were composed mainly of commodity-type items such as wheat flour, sugar, milk, etc. However, with increased consumption of commercial processed and restaurant foods and changes in how national nutrition monitoring data are used (1), many commercial processed and restaurant items have been added to Survey-SR. The current version, Survey-SR 2013-2014, is mainly based on the USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference (SR) 28 (2) and contains sixty-six nutrientseach for 3,404 foods. These nutrient data will be used for assessing intake data from WWEIA, NHANES 2013-2014. Nutrient profiles were added for 265 new foods and updated for about 500 foods from the version used for the previous survey (WWEIA, NHANES 2011-12). New foods added include mainly commercially processed foods such as several gluten-free products, milk substitutes, sauces and condiments such as sriracha, pesto and wasabi, Greek yogurt, breakfast cereals, low-sodium meat products, whole grain pastas and baked products, and several beverages including bottled tea and coffee, coconut water, malt beverages, hard cider, fruit-flavored drinks, fortified fruit juices and fruit and/or vegetable smoothies. Several school lunch pizzas and chicken products, fast-food sandwiches, and new beef cuts were also added, as they are now reported more frequently by survey respondents. Nutrient profiles were updated for several commonly consumed foods such as cheddar, mozzarella and American cheese, ground beef, butter, and catsup. The changes in nutrient values may be due to reformulations in products, changes in the market shares of brands, or more accurate data. Examples of more accurate data include analytical data, market share data, and data from a nationally representative sample. Resources in this dataset: Resource Title: USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference Dataset for What We Eat In America, NHANES 2013-14 (Survey SR 2013-14). File Name: SurveySR_2013_14 (1).zipResource Description: Access database downloaded on November 16, 2017. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Nutrient Data Laboratory. USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference Dataset for What We Eat In America, NHANES (Survey-SR), October 2015. Resource Title: Data Dictionary. File Name: SurveySR_DD.pdf

Many websites operate using the data in the IANA tz database. "What Is Daylight Saving Time" from timeanddate.com is a good place to start to find interesting information about time zones, such as the strange case of Lord Howe Island, Australia.

Data Dictionary

transitions.csv

Changes in the conversion of a given time zone to UTC (for example for daylight savings or because the definition of the time zone changed).

timezones.csv

Descriptions of time zones from the IANA time zone database.

timezone_countries.csv

Countries (or other place names) that overlap with each time zone.

countries.csv

Names of countries and other places.

During hydrocarbon production, water is typically co-produced from the geologic formations producing oil and gas. Understanding the composition of these produced waters is important to help investigate the regional hydrogeology, the source of the water, the efficacy of water treatment and disposal plans, potential economic benefits of mineral commodities in the fluids, and the safety of potential sources of drinking or agricultural water. In addition to waters co-produced with hydrocarbons, geothermal development or exploration brings deep formation waters to the surface for possible sampling. This U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Produced Waters Geochemical Database, which contains geochemical and other information for 114,943 produced water and other deep formation water samples of the United States, is a provisional, updated version of the 2002 USGS Produced Waters Database (Breit and others, 2002). In addition to the major element data presented in the original, the new database contains trace elements, isotopes, and time-series data, as well as nearly 100,000 additional samples that provide greater spatial coverage from both conventional and unconventional reservoir types, including geothermal. The database is a compilation of 40 individual databases, publications, or reports. The database was created in a manner to facilitate addition of new data and correct any compilation errors, and is expected to be updated over time with new data as provided and needed. Table 1, USGSPWDBv2.3 Data Sources.csv, shows the abbreviated ID of each input database (IDDB), the number of samples from each, and its reference. Table 2, USGSPWDBv2.3 Data Dictionary.csv, defines the 190 variables contained in the database and their descriptions. The database variables are organized first with identification and location information, followed by well descriptions, dates, rock properties, physical properties of the water, and then chemistry. The chemistry is organized alphabetically by elemental symbol. Each element is followed by any associated compounds (e.g. H2S is found after S). After Zr, molecules containing carbon, organic 9 compounds and dissolved gases follow. Isotopic data are found at the end of the dataset, just before the culling parameters.

The SSURGO database contains information about soil as collected by the National Cooperative Soil Survey over the course of a century. The information can be displayed in tables or as maps and is available for most areas in the United States and the Territories, Commonwealths, and Island Nations served by the USDA-NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). The information was gathered by walking over the land and observing the soil. Many soil samples were analyzed in laboratories. The maps outline areas called map units. The map units describe soils and other components that have unique properties, interpretations, and productivity. The information was collected at scales ranging from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. More details were gathered at a scale of 1:12,000 than at a scale of 1:63,360. The mapping is intended for natural resource planning and management by landowners, townships, and counties. Some knowledge of soils data and map scale is necessary to avoid misunderstandings. The maps are linked in the database to information about the component soils and their properties for each map unit. Each map unit may contain one to three major components and some minor components. The map units are typically named for the major components. Examples of information available from the database include available water capacity, soil reaction, electrical conductivity, and frequency of flooding; yields for cropland, woodland, rangeland, and pastureland; and limitations affecting recreational development, building site development, and other engineering uses. SSURGO datasets consist of map data, tabular data, and information about how the maps and tables were created. The extent of a SSURGO dataset is a soil survey area, which may consist of a single county, multiple counties, or parts of multiple counties. SSURGO map data can be viewed in the Web Soil Survey or downloaded in ESRI® Shapefile format. The coordinate systems are Geographic. Attribute data can be downloaded in text format that can be imported into a Microsoft® Access® database. A complete SSURGO dataset consists of:

GIS data (as ESRI® Shapefiles) attribute data (dbf files - a multitude of separate tables) database template (MS Access format - this helps with understanding the structure and linkages of the various tables) metadata

Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: SSURGO Metadata - Tables and Columns Report. File Name: SSURGO_Metadata_-_Tables_and_Columns.pdfResource Description: This report contains a complete listing of all columns in each database table. Please see SSURGO Metadata - Table Column Descriptions Report for more detailed descriptions of each column.

Find the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) web site at https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/vt/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_010596#Datamart Title: SSURGO Metadata - Table Column Descriptions Report. File Name: SSURGO_Metadata_-_Table_Column_Descriptions.pdfResource Description: This report contains the descriptions of all columns in each database table. Please see SSURGO Metadata - Tables and Columns Report for a complete listing of all columns in each database table.

Find the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) web site at https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/vt/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_010596#Datamart Title: SSURGO Data Dictionary. File Name: SSURGO 2.3.2 Data Dictionary.csvResource Description: CSV version of the data dictionary

LScDC Word-Category RIG MatrixApril 2020 by Neslihan Suzen, PhD student at the University of Leicester (ns433@leicester.ac.uk / suzenneslihan@hotmail.com)Supervised by Prof Alexander Gorban and Dr Evgeny MirkesGetting StartedThis file describes the Word-Category RIG Matrix for theLeicester Scientific Corpus (LSC) [1], the procedure to build the matrix and introduces the Leicester Scientific Thesaurus (LScT) with the construction process. The Word-Category RIG Matrix is a 103,998 by 252 matrix, where rows correspond to words of Leicester Scientific Dictionary-Core (LScDC) [2] and columns correspond to 252 Web of Science (WoS) categories [3, 4, 5]. Each entry in the matrix corresponds to a pair (category,word). Its value for the pair shows the Relative Information Gain (RIG) on the belonging of a text from the LSC to the category from observing the word in this text. The CSV file of Word-Category RIG Matrix in the published archive is presented with two additional columns of the sum of RIGs in categories and the maximum of RIGs over categories (last two columns of the matrix). So, the file ‘Word-Category RIG Matrix.csv’ contains a total of 254 columns.This matrix is created to be used in future research on quantifying of meaning in scientific texts under the assumption that words have scientifically specific meanings in subject categories and the meaning can be estimated by information gains from word to categories. LScT (Leicester Scientific Thesaurus) is a scientific thesaurus of English. The thesaurus includes a list of 5,000 words from the LScDC. We consider ordering the words of LScDC by the sum of their RIGs in categories. That is, words are arranged in their informativeness in the scientific corpus LSC. Therefore, meaningfulness of words evaluated by words’ average informativeness in the categories. We have decided to include the most informative 5,000 words in the scientific thesaurus. Words as a Vector of Frequencies in WoS CategoriesEach word of the LScDC is represented as a vector of frequencies in WoS categories. Given the collection of the LSC texts, each entry of the vector consists of the number of texts containing the word in the corresponding category.It is noteworthy that texts in a corpus do not necessarily belong to a single category, as they are likely to correspond to multidisciplinary studies, specifically in a corpus of scientific texts. In other words, categories may not be exclusive. There are 252 WoS categories and a text can be assigned to at least 1 and at most 6 categories in the LSC. Using the binary calculation of frequencies, we introduce the presence of a word in a category. We create a vector of frequencies for each word, where dimensions are categories in the corpus.The collection of vectors, with all words and categories in the entire corpus, can be shown in a table, where each entry corresponds to a pair (word,category). This table is build for the LScDC with 252 WoS categories and presented in published archive with this file. The value of each entry in the table shows how many times a word of LScDC appears in a WoS category. The occurrence of a word in a category is determined by counting the number of the LSC texts containing the word in a category. Words as a Vector of Relative Information Gains Extracted for CategoriesIn this section, we introduce our approach to representation of a word as a vector of relative information gains for categories under the assumption that meaning of a word can be quantified by their information gained for categories.For each category, a function is defined on texts that takes the value 1, if the text belongs to the category, and 0 otherwise. For each word, a function is defined on texts that takes the value 1 if the word belongs to the text, and 0 otherwise. Consider LSC as a probabilistic sample space (the space of equally probable elementary outcomes). For the Boolean random variables, the joint probability distribution, the entropy and information gains are defined.The information gain about the category from the word is the amount of information on the belonging of a text from the LSC to the category from observing the word in the text [6]. We used the Relative Information Gain (RIG) providing a normalised measure of the Information Gain. This provides the ability of comparing information gains for different categories. The calculations of entropy, Information Gains and Relative Information Gains can be found in the README file in the archive published. Given a word, we created a vector where each component of the vector corresponds to a category. Therefore, each word is represented as a vector of relative information gains. It is obvious that the dimension of vector for each word is the number of categories. The set of vectors is used to form the Word-Category RIG Matrix, in which each column corresponds to a category, each row corresponds to a word and each component is the relative information gain from the word to the category. In Word-Category RIG Matrix, a row vector represents the corresponding word as a vector of RIGs in categories. We note that in the matrix, a column vector represents RIGs of all words in an individual category. If we choose an arbitrary category, words can be ordered by their RIGs from the most informative to the least informative for the category. As well as ordering words in each category, words can be ordered by two criteria: sum and maximum of RIGs in categories. The top n words in this list can be considered as the most informative words in the scientific texts. For a given word, the sum and maximum of RIGs are calculated from the Word-Category RIG Matrix.RIGs for each word of LScDC in 252 categories are calculated and vectors of words are formed. We then form the Word-Category RIG Matrix for the LSC. For each word, the sum (S) and maximum (M) of RIGs in categories are calculated and added at the end of the matrix (last two columns of the matrix). The Word-Category RIG Matrix for the LScDC with 252 categories, the sum of RIGs in categories and the maximum of RIGs over categories can be found in the database.Leicester Scientific Thesaurus (LScT)Leicester Scientific Thesaurus (LScT) is a list of 5,000 words form the LScDC [2]. Words of LScDC are sorted in descending order by the sum (S) of RIGs in categories and the top 5,000 words are selected to be included in the LScT. We consider these 5,000 words as the most meaningful words in the scientific corpus. In other words, meaningfulness of words evaluated by words’ average informativeness in the categories and the list of these words are considered as a ‘thesaurus’ for science. The LScT with value of sum can be found as CSV file with the published archive. Published archive contains following files:1) Word_Category_RIG_Matrix.csv: A 103,998 by 254 matrix where columns are 252 WoS categories, the sum (S) and the maximum (M) of RIGs in categories (last two columns of the matrix), and rows are words of LScDC. Each entry in the first 252 columns is RIG from the word to the category. Words are ordered as in the LScDC.2) Word_Category_Frequency_Matrix.csv: A 103,998 by 252 matrix where columns are 252 WoS categories and rows are words of LScDC. Each entry of the matrix is the number of texts containing the word in the corresponding category. Words are ordered as in the LScDC.3) LScT.csv: List of words of LScT with sum (S) values. 4) Text_No_in_Cat.csv: The number of texts in categories. 5) Categories_in_Documents.csv: List of WoS categories for each document of the LSC.6) README.txt: Description of Word-Category RIG Matrix, Word-Category Frequency Matrix and LScT and forming procedures.7) README.pdf (same as 6 in PDF format)References[1] Suzen, Neslihan (2019): LSC (Leicester Scientific Corpus). figshare. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.25392/leicester.data.9449639.v2[2] Suzen, Neslihan (2019): LScDC (Leicester Scientific Dictionary-Core). figshare. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.25392/leicester.data.9896579.v3[3] Web of Science. (15 July). Available: https://apps.webofknowledge.com/[4] WoS Subject Categories. Available: https://images.webofknowledge.com/WOKRS56B5/help/WOS/hp_subject_category_terms_tasca.html [5] Suzen, N., Mirkes, E. M., & Gorban, A. N. (2019). LScDC-new large scientific dictionary. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.06858. [6] Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell system technical journal, 27(3), 379-423.

The NuAge Study recruited 1,793 men and women aged 67-84 years in the regions of Montreal and Sherbrooke (QC, Canada) and followed them annually for 3 years. A total of 1,753 participants are part of the NuAge Database and Biobank containing exhaustive data (demography, social, lifestyle, nutrition, functional, clinical, anthropometry, cognition, biomarkers) and biological samples to be shared with the scientific community to carry out research projects characterizing the trajectories of aging.

A later version of this dataset exists published 2019-01-18, accessible through the data links on this page.

This dataset contains records of sting events and specimen samples of jellyfish (Irukandji) along the north Queensland coast from December 1998 to March 2017. This dataset contains an extract (265 records in CSV format) of the publicly available data contained in the Venomous Jellyfish Database. The full database contains approximately 3000 sting events from around Australia and includes records from sources that have not yet been cleared for release.

This extract was made for eAtlas as part of the 2.2.3 NESP Irukandji forecasting system project and used as part of the development of the Irukandji forecasting model. The data was compiled from numerous sources (noted in each record), including Lisa-ann Gershwin and media reports.

The sting data includes primary information such as date, time of day and locality of stings, as well as secondary details such as age and gender of the sting victim, where on the body they were stung, their activity at the time of the sting and their general medical condition.

Limitations:

This data shows the occurrence of reported jellyfish stings and specimens along the north Queensland coast. It does NOT provide a prediction of where jellyfish or jellyfish sting events may occur.

These records represent a fraction of known sting events and specimen collections, with more being added to the list of publicly available data as permissions are granted.

Historical data dates may be coarse, showing month and year that the sting occurred in. Some events have date only.

Methods:

This data set contains information on sting events and specimen collections that have occurred around Australia, which involved venomous jellyfish (Irukandji syndrome-producing species in the genera Carukia, Malo, Morbakka).

This data was collected over numerous years by Lisa-ann Gershwin from various sources, predominantly news reports. This data was entered into an Excel spreadsheet, which formed the basis of the Venomous Jellyfish Database. This database was developed as part of the 2.2.3 NESP Irukandji forecasting system project.

Some data have been standardised, e.g., location information and sting site on the body. Data available to the public have been approved by the data owners, or came from a public source (e.g. newspaper reports, media alerts).

Format:

Comma Separated Value (CSV) table. eAtlas Note: The original database extract was provided as an Excel spreadsheet table. This was converted to a CSV file.

Data Dictionary:

• CSIRO_ID: Unique id
• EVENT_TYPE: Type of event – sting or specimen
• STATE: State in which event occurred
• REGION: Broader region of State the event occurred in
• LOCAL_GOV_AREA: Local government area that the event occurred in – if known
• MAIN_LOCALITY: Main locality that the event occurred in
• SITE_INFO: Site details/comments
• YEAR: Year event occurred
• MONTH: Month event occurred
• DAY: Day of the month the event occurred
• EVENT_TIME: Time the event occurred HH24:MI If time is unknown then NULL
• EVENT_RECORDED: time/date event reported e.g. early afternoon, morning, on weekend
• EVENT_COMMENTS: Comments about the event
• LAT: Latitude in decimal degrees
• LON: Longitude in decimal degrees
• LOCATION_ACCURACY: How accurate the location is
• EVENT_OFFSHORE_ONSHORE: Where the event occurred (if known) – beach, island, reef
• LOCATION_COMMENTS: Comments relating to the location of the event
• WATER_DEPTH_M: Depth of water, in metres, that the event occurred in (if known)
• AGE: Age of patient if known
• SEX: Gender of patient if known
• HOME: Home state/county of patient
• HOSPITAL: Hospital the patient was treated at (if known)
• STING_SITE_REPORTED: Reported sting site on the body
• STING_SITE_BODY: Standardised area on body that sting was reported – upper limb, lower limb etc.
• NUMBER_STINGS: Number of stings recorded, if known
• VISIBLE_STING: The nature of visible sting marks, if reported
• PPE_WORN: Was Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) worn?
• PATIENT_COMMENTS: Comments about the patient
• TIME_TO_ONSET: Delay between sting and onset of symptoms, if reported
• PATIENT_CONDITION: State the patient was in, e.g. distressed, calm, stable
• BLOOD_PRESSURE: Comments relating to blood pressure of the patient
• NAUSEA_VOMITING: Did the patient experience nausea and/or vomiting?
• PAIN: Location and/or intensity of pain experienced by the patient
• SWEATING: Did the patient experience sweating?
• TREATMENT: What treatment the patient was given
• DISCHARGED: When the patient was discharged from hospital
• ONGOING_SYMPTOMS: What ongoing symptoms the patient is experiencing
• NEMATO_SAMPLES: Were nematocyst samples taken?
• SPECIES_NAME: Species name, if determined
• PATROL: Was the sting on a patrolled beach
• CURATOR: Where the data came from e.g. Gershwin = Lisa-ann Gershwin
• DATA_CODE: Access constraint on data
• REFERENCE: Source of the information for event
• ENTERED_BY: Who entered the data
• ENTERED_DATE: When the data was entered

References:

Gershwin, L. (2013). Stung! On Jellyfish Blooms and the Future of the Ocean. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

Lisa-Ann Gershwin , Monica De Nardi , Kenneth D. Winkel & Peter J. Fenner (2010) Marine Stingers: Review of an Under-Recognized Global Coastal Management Issue, Coastal Management, 38:1, 22-41, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08920750903345031

Gershwin L, Condie SA, Mansbridge JV, Richardson AJ. 2014 Dangerous jellyfish blooms are predictable. J. R. Soc. Interface 11: 20131168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2013.1168

Gershwin, L., A. J. Richardson, K. D. Winkel, P. J. Fenner, J. Lippmann, R. Hore, G. Avila-Soria, D. Brewer, R. J. Kloser, A. Steven and S. Condie (2013). Biology and ecology of Irukandji jellyfish (Cnidaria: Cubozoa). Advances in Marine Biology 66: 1-85.

Data Location:

This dataset is filed in the eAtlas enduring data repository at: data\custodian\2016-18-NESP-TWQ-2\2.2.3_Jellyfish-early-warning\AU_NESP-TWQ-2-2-3_CSIRO_Venomous-Jellyfish-DB

MIMIC-III is a large, freely-available database comprising deidentified health-related data associated with over forty thousand patients who stayed in critical care units of the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center between 2001 and 2012. The database includes information such as demographics, vital sign measurements made at the bedside (~1 data point per hour), laboratory test results, procedures, medications, caregiver notes, imaging reports, and mortality (including post-hospital discharge).MIMIC supports a diverse range of analytic studies spanning epidemiology, clinical decision-rule improvement, and electronic tool development. It is notable for three factors: it is freely available to researchers worldwide; it encompasses a diverse and very large population of ICU patients; and it contains highly granular data, including vital signs, laboratory results, and medications.