Sure! I'd be happy to provide you with an introduction to machine learning basics for beginners. Machine learning is a subfield of artificial intelligence (AI) that focuses on enabling computers to learn and make predictions or decisions without being explicitly programmed. Here are some key concepts and terms to help you get started:

1. Supervised Learning: In supervised learning, the machine learning algorithm learns from labeled training data. The training data consists of input examples and their corresponding correct output or target values. The algorithm learns to generalize from this data and make predictions or classify new, unseen examples.

2. Unsupervised Learning: Unsupervised learning involves learning patterns and relationships from unlabeled data. Unlike supervised learning, there are no target values provided. Instead, the algorithm aims to discover inherent structures or clusters in the data.

3. Training Data and Test Data: Machine learning models require a dataset to learn from. The dataset is typically split into two parts: the training data and the test data. The model learns from the training data, and the test data is used to evaluate its performance and generalization ability.

4. Features and Labels: In supervised learning, the input examples are often represented by features or attributes. For example, in a spam email classification task, features might include the presence of certain keywords or the length of the email. The corresponding output or target values are called labels, indicating the class or category to which the example belongs (e.g., spam or not spam).

5. Model Evaluation Metrics: To assess the performance of a machine learning model, various evaluation metrics are used. Common metrics include accuracy (the proportion of correctly predicted examples), precision (the proportion of true positives among all positive predictions), recall (the proportion of true positives predicted correctly), and F1 score (a combination of precision and recall).

6. Overfitting and Underfitting: Overfitting occurs when a model becomes too complex and learns to memorize the training data instead of generalizing well to unseen examples. On the other hand, underfitting happens when a model is too simple and fails to capture the underlying patterns in the data. Balancing the complexity of the model is crucial to achieve good generalization.

7. Feature Engineering: Feature engineering involves selecting or creating relevant features that can help improve the performance of a machine learning model. It often requires domain knowledge and creativity to transform raw data into a suitable representation that captures the important information.

8. Bias and Variance Trade-off: The bias-variance trade-off is a fundamental concept in machine learning. Bias refers to the errors introduced by the model's assumptions and simplifications, while variance refers to the model's sensitivity to small fluctuations in the training data. Reducing bias may increase variance and vice versa. Finding the right balance is important for building a well-performing model.

9. Supervised Learning Algorithms: There are various supervised learning algorithms, including linear regression, logistic regression, decision trees, random forests, support vector machines (SVM), and neural networks. Each algorithm has its own strengths, weaknesses, and specific use cases.

10. Unsupervised Learning Algorithms: Unsupervised learning algorithms include clustering algorithms like k-means clustering and hierarchical clustering, dimensionality reduction techniques like principal component analysis (PCA) and t-SNE, and anomaly detection algorithms, among others.

These concepts provide a starting point for understanding the basics of machine learning. As you delve deeper, you can explore more advanced topics such as deep learning, reinforcement learning, and natural language processing. Remember to practice hands-on with real-world datasets to gain practical experience and further refine your skills.

To analyse large numbers of texts, social science researchers are increasingly confronting the challenge of text classification. When manual labeling is not possible and researchers have to find automatized ways to classify texts, computer science provides a useful toolbox of machine-learning methods whose performance remains understudied in the social sciences. In this article, we compare the performance of the most widely used text classifiers by applying them to a typical research scenario in social science research: a relatively small labeled dataset with infrequent occurrence of categories of interest, which is a part of a large unlabeled dataset. As an example case, we look at Twitter communication regarding climate change, a topic of increasing scholarly interest in interdisciplinary social science research. Using a novel dataset including 5,750 tweets from various international organizations regarding the highly ambiguous concept of climate change, we evaluate the performance of methods in automatically classifying tweets based on whether they are about climate change or not. In this context, we highlight two main findings. First, supervised machine-learning methods perform better than state-of-the-art lexicons, in particular as class balance increases. Second, traditional machine-learning methods, such as logistic regression and random forest, perform similarly to sophisticated deep-learning methods, whilst requiring much less training time and computational resources. The results have important implications for the analysis of short texts in social science research.

The Dataset

These datasets were used while writing the following work:

Polo, F. M., Ciochetti, I., and Bertolo, E. (2021). Predicting legal proceedings status: approaches based on sequential text data. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 264–265.

Please cite us if you use our datasets in your academic work:

@inproceedings{polo2021predicting,
 title={Predicting legal proceedings status: approaches based on sequential text data},
 author={Polo, Felipe Maia and Ciochetti, Itamar and Bertolo, Emerson},
 booktitle={Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law},
 pages={264--265},
 year={2021}
}

More details below!

Context

Every legal proceeding in Brazil is one of three possible classes of status: (i) archived proceedings, (ii) active proceedings, and (iii) suspended proceedings. The three possible classes are given in a specific instant in time, which may be temporary or permanent. Moreover, they are decided by the courts to organize their workflow, which in Brazil may reach thousands of simultaneous cases per judge. Developing machine learning models to classify legal proceedings according to their status can assist public and private institutions in managing large portfolios of legal proceedings, providing gains in scale and efficiency.

In this dataset, each proceeding is made up of a sequence of short texts called “motions” written in Portuguese by the courts’ administrative staff. The motions relate to the proceedings, but not necessarily to their legal status.

Content

Our data is composed of two datasets: a dataset of ~3*10^6 unlabeled motions and a dataset containing 6449 legal proceedings, each with an individual and a variable number of motions, but which have been labeled by lawyers. Among the labeled data, 47.14% is classified as archived (class 1), 45.23% is classified as active (class 2), and 7.63% is classified as suspended (class 3).

The datasets we use are representative samples from the first (São Paulo) and third (Rio de Janeiro) most significant state courts. State courts handle the most variable types of cases throughout Brazil and are responsible for 80% of the total amount of lawsuits. Therefore, these datasets are a good representation of a very significant portion of the use of language and expressions in Brazilian legal vocabulary.

Regarding the labels dataset, the key "-1" denotes the most recent text while "-2" the second most recent and so on.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Ana Carolina Domingues Borges, Andrews Adriani Angeli, and Nathália Caroline Juarez Delgado from Tikal Tech for helping us to obtain the datasets. This work would not be possible without their efforts.

Inspiration

Can you develop good machine learning classifiers for text sequences? :)

Context

STL-10 is an image recognition dataset inspired by CIFAR-10 dataset with some improvements. With a corpus of 100,000 unlabeled images and 500 training images, this dataset is best for developing unsupervised feature learning, deep learning, self-taught learning algorithms. Unlike CIFAR-10, the dataset has a higher resolution which makes it a challenging benchmark for developing more scalable unsupervised learning methods.

Content

Data overview:

• There are three files: train_image.zips, test_images.zip and unlabeled_images.zip
• 10 classes: airplane, bird, car, cat, deer, dog, horse, monkey, ship, truck
• Images are 96x96 pixels, color
• 500 training images (10 pre-defined folds), 800 test images per class
• 100,000 unlabeled images for unsupervised learning. These examples are extracted from a similar but broader distribution of images. For instance, it contains other types of animals (bears, rabbits, etc.) and vehicles (trains, buses, etc.) in addition to the ones in the labeled set
• Images were acquired from labeled examples on ImageNet

The original data source recommends the following standardized testing protocol for reporting results:

1. Perform unsupervised training on the unlabeled data
2. Perform supervised training on the labeled data using 10 (pre-defined) folds of 100 examples from the training data. The indices of the examples to be used for each fold are provided
3. Report average accuracy on the full test set

Acknowledgements

Original data source and banner image: https://cs.stanford.edu/~acoates/stl10/

Please cite the following reference when using this dataset:

Adam Coates, Honglak Lee, Andrew Y. Ng An Analysis of Single Layer Networks in Unsupervised Feature Learning AISTATS, 2011.

Inspiration

• Can you train a model to accurately identify what animal or transportation object is in each image?

Identifying important policy outputs has long been of interest to political scientists. In this work, we propose a novel approach to the classification of policies. Instead of obtaining and aggregating expert evaluations of significance for a finite set of policy outputs, we use experts to identify a small set of significant outputs and then employ positive unlabeled (PU) learning to search for other similar examples in a large unlabeled set. We further propose to automate the first step by harvesting ‘seed’ sets of significant outputs from web data. We offer an application of the new approach by classifying over 9,000 government regulations in the United Kingdom. The obtained estimates are successfully validated against human experts, by forecasting web citations, and with a construct validity test.

A dataset for unsupervised person re-identification using Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs).

Reaching the performance of fully supervised learning with unlabeled data and only labeling one sample per class might be ideal for deep learning applications. We demonstrate for the first time the potential for building one-shot semi-supervised (BOSS) learning on CIFAR-10 and SVHN up to attain test accuracies that are comparable to fully supervised learning. Our method combines class prototype refining, class balancing, and self-training. A good prototype choice is essential and we propose a technique for obtaining iconic examples. In addition, we demonstrate that class balancing methods substantially improve accuracy results in semi-supervised learning to levels that allow self-training to reach the level of fully supervised learning performance. Our experiments demonstrate the value with computing and analyzing test accuracies for every class, rather than only a total test accuracy. We show that our BOSS methodology can obtain total test accuracies with CIFAR-10 images and only one labeled sample per class up to 95% (compared to 94.5% for fully supervised). Similarly, the SVHN images obtains test accuracies of 97.8%, compared to 98.27% for fully supervised. Rigorous empirical evaluations provide evidence that labeling large datasets is not necessary for training deep neural networks. Our code is available at https://github.com/lnsmith54/BOSS to facilitate replication.

These four labeled data sets are targeted at ordinal quantification. The goal of quantification is not to predict the label of each individual instance, but the distribution of labels in unlabeled sets of data.

With the scripts provided, you can extract CSV files from the UCI machine learning repository and from OpenML. The ordinal class labels stem from a binning of a continuous regression label.

We complement this data set with the indices of data items that appear in each sample of our evaluation. Hence, you can precisely replicate our samples by drawing the specified data items. The indices stem from two evaluation protocols that are well suited for ordinal quantification. To this end, each row in the files app_val_indices.csv, app_tst_indices.csv, app-oq_val_indices.csv, and app-oq_tst_indices.csv represents one sample.

Our first protocol is the artificial prevalence protocol (APP), where all possible distributions of labels are drawn with an equal probability. The second protocol, APP-OQ, is a variant thereof, where only the smoothest 20% of all APP samples are considered. This variant is targeted at ordinal quantification tasks, where classes are ordered and a similarity of neighboring classes can be assumed.

Usage

You can extract four CSV files through the provided script extract-oq.jl, which is conveniently wrapped in a Makefile. The Project.toml and Manifest.toml specify the Julia package dependencies, similar to a requirements file in Python.

Preliminaries: You have to have a working Julia installation. We have used Julia v1.6.5 in our experiments.

Data Extraction: In your terminal, you can call either

make

(recommended), or

julia --project="." --eval "using Pkg; Pkg.instantiate()"
julia --project="." extract-oq.jl

Outcome: The first row in each CSV file is the header. The first column, named "class_label", is the ordinal class.

Further Reading

Implementation of our experiments: https://github.com/mirkobunse/regularized-oq

Instance generation creates representative examples to interpret a learning model, as in regression and classification. For example, representative sentences of a topic of interest describe the topic specifically for sentence categorization. In such a situation, a large number of unlabeled observations may be available in addition to labeled data, for example, many unclassified text corpora (unlabeled instances) are available with only a few classified sentences (labeled instances). In this article, we introduce a novel generative method, called a coupled generator, producing instances given a specific learning outcome, based on indirect and direct generators. The indirect generator uses the inverse principle to yield the corresponding inverse probability, enabling to generate instances by leveraging an unlabeled data. The direct generator learns the distribution of an instance given its learning outcome. Then, the coupled generator seeks the best one from the indirect and direct generators, which is designed to enjoy the benefits of both and deliver higher generation accuracy. For sentence generation given a topic, we develop an embedding-based regression/classification in conjuncture with an unconditional recurrent neural network for the indirect generator, whereas a conditional recurrent neural network is natural for the corresponding direct generator. Moreover, we derive finite-sample generation error bounds for the indirect and direct generators to reveal the generative aspects of both methods thus explaining the benefits of the coupled generator. Finally, we apply the proposed methods to a real benchmark of abstract classification and demonstrate that the coupled generator composes reasonably good sentences from a dictionary to describe a specific topic of interest.

In the field of polymer informatics, utilizing machine learning (ML) techniques to evaluate the glass transition temperature Tg and other properties of polymers has attracted extensive attention. This data-centric approach is much more efficient and practical than the laborious experimental measurements when encountered a daunting number of polymer structures. Various ML models are demonstrated to perform well for Tg prediction. Nevertheless, they are trained on different data sets, using different structure representations, and based on different feature engineering methods. Thus, the critical question arises on selecting a proper ML model to better handle the Tg prediction with generalization ability. To provide a fair comparison of different ML techniques and examine the key factors that affect the model performance, we carry out a systematic benchmark study by compiling 79 different ML models and training them on a large and diverse data set. The three major components in setting up an ML model are structure representations, feature representations, and ML algorithms. In terms of polymer structure representation, we consider the polymer monomer, repeat unit, and oligomer with longer chain structure. Based on that feature, representation is calculated, including Morgan fingerprinting with or without substructure frequency, RDKit descriptors, molecular embedding, molecular graph, etc. Afterward, the obtained feature input is trained using different ML algorithms, such as deep neural networks, convolutional neural networks, random forest, support vector machine, LASSO regression, and Gaussian process regression. We evaluate the performance of these ML models using a holdout test set and an extra unlabeled data set from high-throughput molecular dynamics simulation. The ML model’s generalization ability on an unlabeled data set is especially focused, and the model’s sensitivity to topology and the molecular weight of polymers is also taken into consideration. This benchmark study provides not only a guideline for the Tg prediction task but also a useful reference for other polymer informatics tasks.

This dataset provides example observations acquired with a CMOS sensor under two exposure times: 50 ms and 100 ms. For each exposure setting, it includes bright-field images, dark-field images, bright-field images processed using multidimensional feature-based photon event selection, and those processed with a conventional thresholding method. All images are stored in .npz format for efficient loading and processing in Python. This dataset can be used for research on single-photon event extraction algorithms, thresholding methods, and the impact of exposure time on detector performance.

![]() The STL-10 dataset is an image recognition dataset for developing unsupervised feature learning, deep learning, self-taught learning algorithms. It is inspired by the CIFAR-10 dataset but with some modifications. In particular, each class has fewer labeled training examples than in CIFAR-10, but a very large set of unlabeled examples is provided to learn image models prior to supervised training. The primary challenge is to make use of the unlabeled data (which comes from a similar but different distribution from the labeled data) to build a useful prior. We also expect that the higher resolution of this dataset (96x96) will make it a challenging benchmark for developing more scalable unsupervised learning methods. Overview 10 classes: airplane, bird, car, cat, deer, dog, horse, monkey, ship, truck. Images are 96x96 pixels, color. 500 training images (10 pre-defined folds), 800 test images per class. 100000 unlabeled images for uns

Despite the considerable progress in automatic abdominal multi-organ segmentation from CT/MRI scans in recent years, a comprehensive evaluation of the models' capabilities is hampered by the lack of a large-scale benchmark from diverse clinical scenarios. Constraint by the high cost of collecting and labeling 3D medical data, most of the deep learning models to date are driven by datasets with a limited number of organs of interest or samples, which still limits the power of modern deep models and makes it difficult to provide a fully comprehensive and fair estimate of various methods. To mitigate the limitations, we present AMOS, a large-scale, diverse, clinical dataset for abdominal organ segmentation. AMOS provides 500 CT and 100 MRI scans collected from multi-center, multi-vendor, multi-modality, multi-phase, multi-disease patients, each with voxel-level annotations of 15 abdominal organs, providing challenging examples and test-bed for studying robust segmentation algorithms under diverse targets and scenarios. We further benchmark several state-of-the-art medical segmentation models to evaluate the status of the existing methods on this new challenging dataset. We have made our datasets, benchmark servers, and baselines publicly available, and hope to inspire future research. The paper can be found at https://arxiv.org/pdf/2206.08023.pdf

In addition to providing the labeled 600 CT and MRI scans, we expect to provide 2000 CT and 1200 MRI scans without labels to support more learning tasks (semi-supervised, un-supervised, domain adaption, ...). The link can be found in:

• labeled data (500CT+100MRI)
• unlabeled data Part I (900CT)
• unlabeled data Part II (1100CT) (Now there are 1000CT, we will replenish to 1100CT)
• unlabeled data Part III (1200MRI)

if you found this dataset useful for your research, please cite:

@article{ji2022amos,
 title={AMOS: A Large-Scale Abdominal Multi-Organ Benchmark for Versatile Medical Image Segmentation},
 author={Ji, Yuanfeng and Bai, Haotian and Yang, Jie and Ge, Chongjian and Zhu, Ye and Zhang, Ruimao and Li, Zhen and Zhang, Lingyan and Ma, Wanling and Wan, Xiang and others},
 journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.08023},
 year={2022}
}

Banglish Sentiment Dataset

Description A corpus of 300,000 (full dataset) Banglish sentences (eg. 'আমার দেশ' writtern as 'amar desh'). Currently, only 50,000 sentences are available in this repository. If you need the full version, please don't hesitate to drop us an email. The sentences were collected from social media sites, blogs and news portal comments. It can be used to train Sentiment Analysis systems. This dataset can be used to train unsupervised learning algorithms.

Data Fromat The corpus is released in excel and csv format.

How To Get The Full Version If you need the full version, we can arrange a way to send the dataset to you. Please email at contact@socian.ai

License The corpus is licensed under GNU GPLv3, making it very easy to anyone to use the data for any purpose.

in this dataset i have manually labelled first 4999 samples from that unlabeled dataset,where

Positive = 1.0

Negative= 2.0

Neutral= 0.0

reference : https://github.com/socian-ai/socian-bangla-romanized-sentiment-dataset-unlabeled

This data repository contains the OCT images and binary annotations for segmentation of retinal tissue using deep learning. To use, please refer to the Github repository https://github.com/theislab/DeepRT.

#######

Access to large, annotated samples represents a considerable challenge for training accurate deep-learning models in medical imaging. While current leading-edge transfer learning from pre-trained models can help with cases lacking data, it limits design choices, and generally results in the use of unnecessarily large models. We propose a novel, self-supervised training scheme for obtaining high-quality, pre-trained networks from unlabeled, cross-modal medical imaging data, which will allow for creating accurate and efficient models. We demonstrate this by accurately predicting optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based retinal thickness measurements from simple infrared (IR) fundus images. Subsequently, learned representations outperformed advanced classifiers on a separate diabetic retinopathy classification task in a scenario of scarce training data. Our cross-modal, three-staged scheme effectively replaced 26,343 diabetic retinopathy annotations with 1,009 semantic segmentations on OCT and reached the same classification accuracy using only 25% of fundus images, without any drawbacks, since OCT is not required for predictions. We expect this concept will also apply to other multimodal clinical data-imaging, health records, and genomics data, and be applicable to corresponding sample-starved learning problems.

#######

Self-Supervised Learning Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the global self-supervised learning market size reached USD 10.2 billion in 2024, demonstrating rapid adoption across multiple sectors. The market is set to expand at a strong CAGR of 33.1% from 2025 to 2033, propelled by the growing need for advanced artificial intelligence solutions that minimize dependency on labeled data. By 2033, the market is forecasted to achieve an impressive size of USD 117.2 billion, underscoring the transformative potential of self-supervised learning in revolutionizing data-driven decision-making and automation across industries. This growth trajectory is supported by increasing investments in AI research, the proliferation of big data, and the urgent demand for scalable machine learning models.

The primary growth driver for the self-supervised learning market is the exponential surge in data generation across industries and the corresponding need for efficient data labeling techniques. Traditional supervised learning requires vast amounts of labeled data, which is both time-consuming and expensive to annotate. Self-supervised learning, by contrast, leverages unlabeled data to train models, significantly reducing operational costs and accelerating the deployment of AI systems. This paradigm shift is particularly critical in sectors like healthcare, finance, and autonomous vehicles, where large datasets are abundant but labeled examples are scarce. As organizations seek to unlock value from their data assets, self-supervised learning is emerging as a cornerstone technology, enabling more robust, scalable, and generalizable AI applications.

Another significant factor fueling market expansion is the rapid advancement in computing infrastructure and algorithmic innovation. The availability of high-performance hardware, such as GPUs and TPUs, coupled with breakthroughs in neural network architectures, has made it feasible to train complex self-supervised models on massive datasets. Additionally, the open-source movement and collaborative research have democratized access to state-of-the-art self-supervised learning frameworks, fostering innovation and lowering barriers to entry for enterprises of all sizes. These technological advancements are empowering organizations to experiment with self-supervised learning at scale, driving adoption across a wide range of applications, from natural language processing to computer vision and robotics.

The market is also benefiting from the growing emphasis on ethical AI and data privacy. Self-supervised learning methods, which minimize the need for sensitive labeled data, are increasingly being adopted to address privacy concerns and regulatory compliance requirements. This is particularly relevant in regions with stringent data protection regulations, such as the European Union. Furthermore, the ability of self-supervised learning to generalize across domains and tasks is enabling businesses to build more resilient and adaptable AI systems, further accelerating market growth. The convergence of these factors is positioning self-supervised learning as a key enabler of next-generation AI solutions.

Transfer Learning is emerging as a pivotal technique in the realm of self-supervised learning, offering a bridge between different domains and tasks. By leveraging knowledge from pre-trained models, transfer learning allows for the adaptation of AI systems to new, related tasks with minimal additional data. This approach is particularly beneficial in scenarios where labeled data is scarce, enabling models to generalize better and learn more efficiently. The integration of transfer learning into self-supervised frameworks is enhancing the ability of AI systems to tackle complex problems across various industries, from healthcare diagnostics to autonomous driving. As the demand for versatile and efficient AI solutions grows, transfer learning is set to play a crucial role in the evolution of self-supervised learning technologies.

From a regional perspective, North America currently leads the self-supervised learning market, accounting for the largest share due to its robust AI research ecosystem, significant investments from technology giants, and early adoption across verticals. However, Asia Pacific is projected to witness the fastest growth over the forecast period, driven by the rapid digital tran

The experiment is based on the common high speed milling data set to verify the robustness of the model to various tool types. The data set contains six sub data sets, corresponding to the wear process of six different types of tools. Three of the sub data sets contain tool wear labels, while the other three sub data sets do not. The tools used are all three edged 6mm ball cemented carbide tools, but their geometry and coating are different. The workpiece is Inconel 718, which is widely used for jet engine blade milling. The spindle speed is 10360rpm, and the cutting depth is 0.25mm. The tool cuts from the upper edge of the workpiece surface to the lower edge in a zigzag manner. In the whole milling process, the cutting length of each tool is about 0.1125m × 315pass = 35.44m. The cutting signal in Experiment 1 includes the cutting force signal collected by the three channel Kistler dynamometer and the vibration signal collected by the three channel Kistler accelerometer at a sampling rate of 50 kHz. Use the microscope LEICA MZ12 to measure the wear of the rear tool surface of the three teeth offline after each tool feeding. In this experiment, a cutting signal is collected every other period of time to predict the wear of the three teeth of the tool.The samples are divided into training set, evaluation set, test set and reconstruction set. The training set and evaluation set samples are from two kinds of tools, including 30000 and 4096 samples respectively; The samples of the test set are from another tool, including 9472 samples; The reconstruction set comes from the unlabeled data generated by the other three tools, including 40832 samples. Each sample contains three channels of cutting force signal and three channels of vibration signal. The sampling points of each channel signal are 2304. The following preprocessing steps are performed:1) Signal clippingSince the feed rate and sampling rate are constant throughout the experiment, the data set of each experiment can be approximately understood as a signal matrix evenly distributed on the workpiece surface, ignoring the slight difference in the number of sampling points for each tool path. The ordinate of the matrix corresponds to the index of the tool path times, and the abscissa corresponds to the index of the sampling point. Because the generation rules of cutting signals are different in uncut, cut in, cut out and stable states, the sampling points close to the edge of the workpiece are removed. Here we simply cut 2% off the two ends of the cutting signal obtained by each tool feed.2) Data amplificationBecause tool wear can only be observed with a microscope after each tool feeding, each wear tag corresponds to a cutting signal containing about 120000 sampling points, and the acquisition of tool wear also takes a lot of time. In this case, the number of tags extracted is not enough to fit the model, nor can the robustness of the algorithm be guaranteed. It is necessary to artificially split the sample and expand the tool wear label. Considering that the tool wear is a slow and continuous process, and there is a certain deviation in the experimental measurement, the linear interpolation method is adopted here. We also tested quadratic interpolation and polynomial fitting methods, but no better results were observed. It needs to be stated here that the essence of prediction is to find a function that maps the sample space to the target space. For any point in the sample space, the model can find the corresponding value in the target space. What sample amplification does is to sample more times in the target space, so as to more comprehensively describe this mapping relationship, rather than redefining this relationship.The task of this study is to monitor the wear of the rear cutter surface of the three teeth according to the six channel sensor signals. On the test set, the mean square error (MSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) between the predicted value and the observed value of the microscope are 0.0013 and 4%, respectively, and the average and maximum final prediction error (FPE) are 5 μ M and 23 μ m. The training time was 2130s, and the single prediction time was 1.79ms. The accuracy, training time and detection efficiency of tool wear monitoring can meet the current industrial needs. As MPAN realizes the mapping from cutting signal to tool wear, as the gate of control information flow, attention unit retains the importance information of input features. The predicted tool wear curve is basically consistent with the curve observed by the microscope.

Self-supervised metric learning has been a successful approach for learning a distance from an unlabeled dataset. The resulting distance is broadly useful for improving various distance-based downstream tasks, even when no information from downstream tasks is used in the metric learning stage. To gain insights into this approach, we develop a statistical framework to theoretically study how self-supervised metric learning can benefit downstream tasks in the context of multi-view data. Under this framework, we show that the target distance of metric learning satisfies several desired properties for the downstream tasks. On the other hand, our investigation suggests the target distance can be further improved by moderating each direction’s weights. In addition, our analysis precisely characterizes the improvement by self-supervised metric learning on four commonly used downstream tasks: sample identification, two-sample testing, k-means clustering, and k-nearest neighbor classification. When the distance is estimated from an unlabeled dataset, we establish the upper bound on distance estimation’s accuracy and the number of samples sufficient for downstream task improvement. Finally, numerical experiments are presented to support the theoretical results in the article. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

The prediction of response to drugs before initiating therapy based on transcriptome data is a major challenge. However, identifying effective drug response label data costs time and resources. Methods available often predict poorly and fail to identify robust biomarkers due to the curse of dimensionality: high dimensionality and low sample size. Therefore, this necessitates the development of predictive models to effectively predict the response to drugs using limited labeled data while being interpretable. In this study, we report a novel Hierarchical Graph Random Neural Networks (HiRAND) framework to predict the drug response using transcriptome data of few labeled data and additional unlabeled data. HiRAND completes the information integration of the gene graph and sample graph by graph convolutional network (GCN). The innovation of our model is leveraging data augmentation strategy to solve the dilemma of limited labeled data and using consistency regularization to optimize the prediction consistency of unlabeled data across different data augmentations. The results showed that HiRAND achieved better performance than competitive methods in various prediction scenarios, including both simulation data and multiple drug response data. We found that the prediction ability of HiRAND in the drug vorinostat showed the best results across all 62 drugs. In addition, HiRAND was interpreted to identify the key genes most important to vorinostat response, highlighting critical roles for ribosomal protein-related genes in the response to histone deacetylase inhibition. Our HiRAND could be utilized as an efficient framework for improving the drug response prediction performance using few labeled data.

MULTI-TEMPORAL REMOTE SENSING IMAGE CLASSIFICATION - A MULTI-VIEW APPROACH VARUN CHANDOLA AND RANGA RAJU VATSAVAI Abstract. Multispectral remote sensing images have been widely used for automated land use and land cover classification tasks. Often thematic classification is done using single date image, however in many instances a single date image is not informative enough to distinguish between different land cover types. In this paper we show how one can use multiple images, collected at different times of year (for example, during crop growing season), to learn a better classifier. We propose two approaches, an ensemble of classifiers approach and a co-training based approach, and show how both of these methods outperform a straightforward stacked vector approach often used in multi-temporal image classification. Additionally, the co-training based method addresses the challenge of limited labeled training data in supervised classification, as this classification scheme utilizes a large number of unlabeled samples (which comes for free) in conjunction with a small set of labeled training data.