100+ datasets found
  1. Superstore Sales: The Data Quality Challenge

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Oct 25, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Data Obsession (2025). Superstore Sales: The Data Quality Challenge [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/dataobsession/superstore-sales-the-data-quality-challenge
    Explore at:
    zip(1512911 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 25, 2025
    Authors
    Data Obsession
    License

    Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Superstore Sales - The Data Quality Challenge Edition (25K Records)

    This dataset is an expanded version of the popular "Sample - Superstore Sales" dataset, commonly used for introductory data analysis and visualization. It contains detailed transactional data for a US-based retail company, covering orders, products, and customer information.

    This version is specifically designed for practicing Data Quality (DQ) and Data Wrangling skills, featuring a unique set of real-world "dirty data" problems (like those encountered in tools like SPSS Modeler, Tableau Prep, or Alteryx) that must be cleaned before any analysis or machine learning can begin.

    This dataset combines the original Superstore data with 15,000 plausibly generated synthetic records, totaling 25,000 rows of transactional data. It includes 21 columns detailing: - Order Information: Order ID, Order Date, Ship Date, Ship Mode. - Customer Information: Customer ID, Customer Name, Segment. - Geographic Information: Country, City, State, Postal Code, Region. - Product Information: Product ID, Category, Sub-Category, Product Name. - Financial Metrics: Sales, Quantity, Discount, and Profit.

    🚨 Introduced Data Quality Challenges (The Dirty Data)

    This dataset is intentionally corrupted to provide a robust practice environment for data cleaning. Challenges include: Missing/Inconsistent Values: Deliberate gaps in Profit and Discount, and multiple inconsistent entries (-- or blank) in the Region column.

    • Data Type Mismatches: Order Date and Ship Date are stored as text strings, and the Profit column is polluted with comma-formatted strings (e.g., "1,234.56"), forcing the entire column to be read as an object (string) type.

    • Categorical Inconsistencies: The Category field contains variations and typos like "Tech", "technologies", "Furni", and "OfficeSupply" that require standardization.

    • Outliers and Invalid Data: Extreme outliers have been added to the Sales and Profit fields, alongside a subset of transactions with an invalid Sales value of 0.

    • Duplicate Records: Over 200 rows are duplicated (with slight financial variations) to test your deduplication logic.

    ❓ Suggested Analysis and Modeling Tasks

    This dataset is ideal for:

    Data Wrangling/Cleaning (Primary Focus): Fix all the intentional data quality issues before proceeding.

    Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA): Analyze sales distribution by region, segment, and category.

    Regression: Predict the Profit based on Sales, Discount, and product features.

    Classification: Build an RFM Model (Recency, Frequency, Monetary) and create a target variable (HighValueCustomer = 1 if total sales are* $>$ $1000$*) to be predicted by logistical regression or decision trees.

    Time Series Analysis: Aggregate sales by month/year to perform forecasting.

    Acknowledgements

    This dataset is an expanded and corrupted derivative of the original Sample Superstore dataset, credited to Tableau and widely shared for educational purposes. All synthetic records were generated to follow the plausible distribution of the original data.

  2. G

    Real-Time Data Quality Monitoring AI Market Research Report 2033

    • growthmarketreports.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Aug 22, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Growth Market Reports (2025). Real-Time Data Quality Monitoring AI Market Research Report 2033 [Dataset]. https://growthmarketreports.com/report/real-time-data-quality-monitoring-ai-market
    Explore at:
    csv, pdf, pptxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 22, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Growth Market Reports
    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Real-Time Data Quality Monitoring AI Market Outlook



    According to our latest research, the global Real-Time Data Quality Monitoring AI market size reached USD 1.82 billion in 2024, reflecting robust demand across multiple industries. The market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 19.4% during the forecast period, reaching a projected value of USD 8.78 billion by 2033. This impressive growth trajectory is primarily driven by the increasing need for accurate, actionable data in real time to support digital transformation, compliance, and competitive advantage across sectors. The proliferation of data-intensive applications and the growing complexity of data ecosystems are further fueling the adoption of AI-powered data quality monitoring solutions worldwide.




    One of the primary growth factors for the Real-Time Data Quality Monitoring AI market is the exponential increase in data volume and velocity generated by digital business processes, IoT devices, and cloud-based applications. Organizations are increasingly recognizing that poor data quality can have significant negative impacts on business outcomes, ranging from flawed analytics to regulatory penalties. As a result, there is a heightened focus on leveraging AI-driven tools that can continuously monitor, cleanse, and validate data streams in real time. This shift is particularly evident in industries such as BFSI, healthcare, and retail, where real-time decision-making is critical and the cost of errors can be substantial. The integration of machine learning algorithms and natural language processing in data quality monitoring solutions is enabling more sophisticated anomaly detection, pattern recognition, and predictive analytics, thereby enhancing overall data governance frameworks.




    Another significant driver is the increasing regulatory scrutiny and compliance requirements surrounding data integrity and privacy. Regulations such as GDPR, HIPAA, and CCPA are compelling organizations to implement robust data quality management systems that can provide audit trails, ensure data lineage, and support automated compliance reporting. Real-Time Data Quality Monitoring AI tools are uniquely positioned to address these challenges by providing continuous oversight and immediate alerts on data quality issues, thereby reducing the risk of non-compliance and associated penalties. Furthermore, the rise of cloud computing and hybrid IT environments is making it imperative for enterprises to maintain consistent data quality across disparate systems and geographies, further boosting the demand for scalable and intelligent monitoring solutions.




    The growing adoption of advanced analytics, artificial intelligence, and machine learning across industries is also contributing to market expansion. As organizations seek to leverage predictive insights and automate business processes, the need for high-quality, real-time data becomes paramount. AI-powered data quality monitoring solutions not only enhance the accuracy of analytics but also enable proactive data management by identifying potential issues before they impact downstream applications. This is particularly relevant in sectors such as manufacturing and telecommunications, where operational efficiency and customer experience are closely tied to data reliability. The increasing investment in digital transformation initiatives and the emergence of Industry 4.0 are expected to further accelerate the adoption of real-time data quality monitoring AI solutions in the coming years.




    From a regional perspective, North America continues to dominate the Real-Time Data Quality Monitoring AI market, accounting for the largest revenue share in 2024, followed by Europe and Asia Pacific. The presence of leading technology providers, early adoption of AI and analytics, and stringent regulatory frameworks are key factors driving market growth in these regions. Asia Pacific is anticipated to witness the highest CAGR during the forecast period, fueled by rapid digitalization, expanding IT infrastructure, and increasing investments in AI technologies across countries such as China, India, and Japan. Meanwhile, Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are emerging as promising markets, supported by growing awareness of data quality issues and the gradual adoption of advanced data management solutions.



  3. Data Quality Tools Market in APAC 2019-2023

    • technavio.com
    pdf
    Updated Dec 5, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Technavio (2018). Data Quality Tools Market in APAC 2019-2023 [Dataset]. https://www.technavio.com/report/data-quality-tools-market-in-apac-industry-analysis
    Explore at:
    pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 5, 2018
    Dataset provided by
    TechNavio
    Authors
    Technavio
    License

    https://www.technavio.com/content/privacy-noticehttps://www.technavio.com/content/privacy-notice

    Description

    Snapshot img { margin: 10px !important; } Below are some of the key findings from this data quality tools market in APAC analysis report

    See the complete table of contents and list of exhibits, as well as selected illustrations and example pages from this report.

    Get a FREE sample now!

    Data quality tools market in APAC overview

    The need to improve customer engagement is the primary factor driving the growth of data quality tools market in APAC. The reputation of a company gets hampered if there is a delay in product delivery or response to payment-related queries. To avoid such issues organizations are integrating their data with software such as CRM for effective communication with customers. To capitalize on market opportunities, organizations are adopting data quality strategies to perform accurate customer profiling and improve customer satisfaction.

    Also, by using data quality tools, companies can ensure that targeted communications reach the right customers which will enable companies to take real-time action as per the requirements of the customer. Organizations use data quality tool to validate e-mails at the point of capture and clean their database of junk e-mail addresses. Thus, the need to improve customer engagement is driving the data quality tools market growth in APAC at a CAGR of close to 23% during the forecast period.

    Top data quality tools companies in APAC covered in this report

    The data quality tools market in APAC is highly concentrated. To help clients improve their revenue shares in the market, this research report provides an analysis of the market’s competitive landscape and offers information on the products offered by various leading companies. Additionally, this data quality tools market in APAC analysis report suggests strategies companies can follow and recommends key areas they should focus on, to make the most of upcoming growth opportunities.

    The report offers a detailed analysis of several leading companies, including:

    IBM
    Informatica
    Oracle
    SAS Institute
    Talend
    

    Data quality tools market in APAC segmentation based on end-user

    Banking, financial services, and insurance (BFSI)
    Telecommunication
    Retail
    Healthcare
    Others
    

    BFSI was the largest end-user segment of the data quality tools market in APAC in 2018. The market share of this segment will continue to dominate the market throughout the next five years.

    Data quality tools market in APAC segmentation based on region

    China
    Japan
    Australia
    Rest of Asia
    

    China accounted for the largest data quality tools market share in APAC in 2018. This region will witness an increase in its market share and remain the market leader for the next five years.

    Key highlights of the data quality tools market in APAC for the forecast years 2019-2023:

    CAGR of the market during the forecast period 2019-2023
    Detailed information on factors that will accelerate the growth of the data quality tools market in APAC during the next five years
    Precise estimation of the data quality tools market size in APAC and its contribution to the parent market
    Accurate predictions on upcoming trends and changes in consumer behavior
    The growth of the data quality tools market in APAC across China, Japan, Australia, and Rest of Asia
    A thorough analysis of the market’s competitive landscape and detailed information on several vendors
    Comprehensive details on factors that will challenge the growth of data quality tools companies in APAC
    

    We can help! Our analysts can customize this market research report to meet your requirements. Get in touch

  4. G

    Data Quality Rule Generation AI Market Research Report 2033

    • growthmarketreports.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Aug 22, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Growth Market Reports (2025). Data Quality Rule Generation AI Market Research Report 2033 [Dataset]. https://growthmarketreports.com/report/data-quality-rule-generation-ai-market
    Explore at:
    pptx, pdf, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 22, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Growth Market Reports
    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Data Quality Rule Generation AI Market Outlook



    According to our latest research, the global Data Quality Rule Generation AI market size reached USD 1.42 billion in 2024, reflecting the growing adoption of artificial intelligence in data management across industries. The market is projected to expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 26.8% from 2025 to 2033, reaching an estimated USD 13.29 billion by 2033. This robust growth trajectory is primarily driven by the increasing need for high-quality, reliable data to fuel digital transformation initiatives, regulatory compliance, and advanced analytics across sectors.



    One of the primary growth factors for the Data Quality Rule Generation AI market is the exponential rise in data volumes and complexity across organizations worldwide. As enterprises accelerate their digital transformation journeys, they generate and accumulate vast amounts of structured and unstructured data from diverse sources, including IoT devices, cloud applications, and customer interactions. This data deluge creates significant challenges in maintaining data quality, consistency, and integrity. AI-powered data quality rule generation solutions offer a scalable and automated approach to defining, monitoring, and enforcing data quality standards, reducing manual intervention and improving overall data trustworthiness. Moreover, the integration of machine learning and natural language processing enables these solutions to adapt to evolving data landscapes, further enhancing their value proposition for enterprises seeking to unlock actionable insights from their data assets.



    Another key driver for the market is the increasing regulatory scrutiny and compliance requirements across various industries, such as BFSI, healthcare, and government sectors. Regulatory bodies are imposing stricter mandates around data governance, privacy, and reporting accuracy, compelling organizations to implement robust data quality frameworks. Data Quality Rule Generation AI tools help organizations automate the creation and enforcement of complex data validation rules, ensuring compliance with industry standards like GDPR, HIPAA, and Basel III. This automation not only reduces the risk of non-compliance and associated penalties but also streamlines audit processes and enhances stakeholder confidence in data-driven decision-making. The growing emphasis on data transparency and accountability is expected to further drive the adoption of AI-driven data quality solutions in the coming years.



    The proliferation of cloud-based analytics platforms and data lakes is also contributing significantly to the growth of the Data Quality Rule Generation AI market. As organizations migrate their data infrastructure to the cloud to leverage scalability and cost efficiencies, they face new challenges in managing data quality across distributed environments. Cloud-native AI solutions for data quality rule generation provide seamless integration with leading cloud platforms, enabling real-time data validation and cleansing at scale. These solutions offer advanced features such as predictive data quality assessment, anomaly detection, and automated remediation, empowering organizations to maintain high data quality standards in dynamic cloud environments. The shift towards cloud-first strategies is expected to accelerate the demand for AI-powered data quality tools, particularly among enterprises with complex, multi-cloud, or hybrid data architectures.



    From a regional perspective, North America continues to dominate the Data Quality Rule Generation AI market, accounting for the largest share in 2024 due to early adoption, a strong technology ecosystem, and stringent regulatory frameworks. However, the Asia Pacific region is witnessing the fastest growth, fueled by rapid digitalization, expanding IT infrastructure, and increasing investments in AI and analytics by enterprises and governments. Europe is also a significant market, driven by robust data privacy regulations and a mature enterprise landscape. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are emerging as promising markets, supported by growing awareness of data quality benefits and the proliferation of cloud and AI technologies. The global outlook remains highly positive as organizations across regions recognize the strategic importance of data quality in achieving business objectives and competitive advantage.



  5. G

    Data Quality Observability Market Research Report 2033

    • growthmarketreports.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Sep 1, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Growth Market Reports (2025). Data Quality Observability Market Research Report 2033 [Dataset]. https://growthmarketreports.com/report/data-quality-observability-market
    Explore at:
    pdf, pptx, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 1, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Growth Market Reports
    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Data Quality Observability Market Outlook



    According to our latest research, the global Data Quality Observability market size reached USD 1.42 billion in 2024, reflecting robust growth momentum across sectors. The market is projected to register a strong CAGR of 18.9% from 2025 to 2033, reaching an estimated value of USD 7.43 billion by 2033. This expansion is driven by the surging demand for real-time data monitoring, the increasing complexity of data ecosystems, and the critical need for data-driven decision-making in enterprises worldwide. The adoption of artificial intelligence and machine learning for proactive data quality management is also accelerating the marketÂ’s trajectory, as organizations strive to maintain trust and compliance in an era of digital transformation.




    One of the primary growth factors fueling the Data Quality Observability market is the exponential increase in data volumes and diversity. As organizations embrace cloud computing, IoT devices, and digital channels, they generate vast, heterogeneous datasets that require constant monitoring for accuracy, consistency, and reliability. This data explosion has made traditional data quality tools insufficient, prompting enterprises to seek advanced observability solutions that offer end-to-end visibility and automated anomaly detection. The integration of AI and ML algorithms into these platforms enables proactive identification and remediation of data quality issues, reducing manual intervention and enhancing operational efficiency. Furthermore, the growing importance of data in driving business outcomes and regulatory compliance has made data quality observability a strategic imperative for organizations across all industries.




    Another significant driver is the rising emphasis on regulatory compliance and data governance. With stringent regulations such as GDPR, CCPA, and HIPAA, businesses are under immense pressure to ensure the integrity, security, and traceability of their data assets. Data quality observability tools provide the necessary transparency and auditability, empowering organizations to demonstrate compliance and avoid costly penalties. These solutions facilitate continuous monitoring and reporting, ensuring that data remains accurate and compliant throughout its lifecycle. The increasing adoption of data governance frameworks, coupled with the need to safeguard sensitive information, is propelling investments in data quality observability technologies, particularly in highly regulated sectors such as BFSI, healthcare, and government.




    The proliferation of cloud-based data infrastructures and the adoption of hybrid and multi-cloud strategies are also driving market growth. As organizations migrate their workloads to the cloud, they face new challenges related to data integration, synchronization, and quality assurance across disparate environments. Data quality observability platforms bridge these gaps by providing unified monitoring and analytics capabilities, regardless of where data resides. These solutions offer scalability, flexibility, and real-time insights, enabling organizations to maintain high standards of data quality even in complex, distributed ecosystems. The shift towards cloud-native architectures and the increasing reliance on data-driven applications are expected to further accelerate the adoption of data quality observability solutions in the coming years.




    From a regional perspective, North America continues to lead the Data Quality Observability market, accounting for the largest share in 2024, followed by Europe and Asia Pacific. The presence of a mature IT ecosystem, early adoption of advanced analytics, and stringent regulatory requirements have made North America a frontrunner in this space. However, Asia Pacific is expected to witness the fastest growth during the forecast period, driven by rapid digitalization, expanding enterprise IT budgets, and increasing awareness of data quality challenges. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are also showing promising potential, as organizations in these regions invest in modern data management solutions to support their digital transformation initiatives.



  6. H

    Data for: Identifying Metadata Quality Issues Across Cultures

    • dataverse.harvard.edu
    • search.dataone.org
    Updated Jul 26, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Julie Shi; Mike Nason; Marco Tullney; Juan Pablo Alperin (2023). Data for: Identifying Metadata Quality Issues Across Cultures [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/GZI7IA
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Jul 26, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Harvard Dataverse
    Authors
    Julie Shi; Mike Nason; Marco Tullney; Juan Pablo Alperin
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This sample was drawn from the Crossref API on March 8, 2022. The sample was constructed purposefully on the hypothesis that records with at least one known issue would be more likely to yield issues related to cultural meanings and identity. Records known or suspected to have at least one quality issue were selected by the authors and Crossref staff. The Crossref API was then used to randomly select additional records from the same prefix. Records in the sample represent 51 DOI prefixes that were chosen without regard for the manuscript management or publishing platform used, as well as 17 prefixes for journals known to use the Open Journal Systems manuscript management and publishing platform. OJS was specifically identified due to the authors' familiarity with the platform, its international and multilingual reach, and previous work on its metadata quality.

  7. d

    COVID-19 County Level Data - Archive

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.ct.gov
    • +1more
    Updated Jun 21, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    data.ct.gov (2025). COVID-19 County Level Data - Archive [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/covid-19-county-level-data
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 21, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    data.ct.gov
    Description

    Covid-19 Daily metrics at the county level As of 6/1/2023, this data set is no longer being updated. The COVID-19 Data Report is posted on the Open Data Portal every day at 3pm. The report uses data from multiple sources, including external partners; if data from external partners are not received by 3pm, they are not available for inclusion in the report and will not be displayed. Data that are received after 3pm will still be incorporated and published in the next report update. The cumulative number of COVID-19 cases (cumulative_cases) includes all cases of COVID-19 that have ever been reported to DPH. The cumulative number of COVID_19 cases in the last 7 days (cases_7days) only includes cases where the specimen collection date is within the past 7 days. While most cases are reported to DPH within 48 hours of specimen collection, there are a small number of cases that routinely are delayed, and will have specimen collection dates that fall outside of the rolling 7 day reporting window. Additionally, reporting entities may submit correction files to contribute historic data during initial onboarding or to address data quality issues; while this is rare, these correction files may cause a large amount of data from outside of the current reporting window to be uploaded in a single day; this would result in the change in cumulative_cases being much larger than the value of cases_7days. On June 4, 2020, the US Department of Health and Human Services issued guidance requiring the reporting of positive and negative test results for SARS-CoV-2; this guidance expired with the end of the federal PHE on 5/11/2023, and negative SARS-CoV-2 results were removed from the List of Reportable Laboratory Findings. DPH will no longer be reporting metrics that were dependent on the collection of negative test results, specifically total tests performed or percent positivity. Positive antigen and PCR/NAAT results will continue to be reportable.

  8. Data Quality Tools Market by Deployment and Geography - Forecast and...

    • technavio.com
    pdf
    Updated May 18, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Technavio (2021). Data Quality Tools Market by Deployment and Geography - Forecast and Analysis 2021-2025 [Dataset]. https://www.technavio.com/report/data-quality-tools-market-industry-analysis
    Explore at:
    pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 18, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    TechNavio
    Authors
    Technavio
    License

    https://www.technavio.com/content/privacy-noticehttps://www.technavio.com/content/privacy-notice

    Description

    Snapshot img

    The data quality tools market has the potential to grow by USD 1.09 billion during 2021-2025, and the market’s growth momentum will accelerate at a CAGR of 14.30%.

    This data quality tools market research report provides valuable insights on the post COVID-19 impact on the market, which will help companies evaluate their business approaches. Furthermore, this report extensively covers market segmentation by deployment (on-premise and cloud-based) and geography (North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and Middle East and Africa). The data quality tools market report also offers information on several market vendors, including Accenture Plc, Ataccama Corp., DQ Global, Experian Plc, International Business Machines Corp., Oracle Corp., Precisely, SAP SE, SAS Institute Inc., and TIBCO Software Inc. among others.

    What will the Data Quality Tools Market Size be in 2021?

    Browse TOC and LoE with selected illustrations and example pages of Data Quality Tools Market

    Get Your FREE Sample Now!

    Data Quality Tools Market: Key Drivers and Trends

    The increasing use of data quality tools for marketing is notably driving the data quality tools market growth, although factors such as high implementation and production cost may impede market growth. To unlock information on the key market drivers and the COVID-19 pandemic impact on the data quality tools industry get your FREE report sample now.

    Enterprises are increasingly using data quality tools, to clean and profile the data to target customers with appropriate products, for digital marketing. Data quality tools help in digital marketing by collecting accurate customer data that is stored in databases and translate that data into rich cross-channel customer profiles. This data helps enterprises in making better decisions on how to maximize the funds coming in. Thus, the rising use of data quality tools to change company processes of marketing is driving the data quality tools market growth.

    This data quality tools market analysis report also provides detailed information on other upcoming trends and challenges that will have a far-reaching effect on the market growth. Get detailed insights on the trends and challenges, which will help companies evaluate and develop growth strategies.

    Who are the Major Data Quality Tools Market Vendors?

    The report analyzes the market’s competitive landscape and offers information on several market vendors, including:

    Accenture Plc
    Ataccama Corp.
    DQ Global
    Experian Plc
    International Business Machines Corp.
    Oracle Corp.
    Precisely
    SAP SE
    SAS Institute Inc.
    TIBCO Software Inc.
    

    The data quality tools market is fragmented and the vendors are deploying organic and inorganic growth strategies to compete in the market. Click here to uncover other successful business strategies deployed by the vendors.

    To make the most of the opportunities and recover from post COVID-19 impact, market vendors should focus more on the growth prospects in the fast-growing segments, while maintaining their positions in the slow-growing segments.

    Download a free sample of the data quality tools market forecast report for insights on complete key vendor profiles. The profiles include information on the production, sustainability, and prospects of the leading companies.

    Which are the Key Regions for Data Quality Tools Market?

    For more insights on the market share of various regions Request for a FREE sample now!

    39% of the market’s growth will originate from North America during the forecast period. The US is the key market for data quality tools market in North America. Market growth in this region will be slower than the growth of the market in APAC, South America, and MEA.

    The expansion of data in the region, fueled by the increasing adherence to mobile and Internet of Things (IoT), the presence of major data quality tools vendors, stringent data-related regulatory compliances, and ongoing projects will facilitate the data quality tools market growth in North America over the forecast period. To garner further competitive intelligence and regional opportunities in store for vendors, view our sample report.

    What are the Revenue-generating Deployment Segments in the Data Quality Tools Market?

    To gain further insights on the market contribution of various segments Request for a FREE sample

    Although the on-premises segment is expected to grow at a slower rate than the cloud-based segment, primarily due to the high cost of on-premises deployment, its prime advantage of total ownership by the end-user will retain its market share. Also, in an on-premise solution, customization is high, which makes it more adaptable among large enterprises, thus driving the revenue growth of the market.

    Fetch actionable market insights on post COVID-19 impact on each segment. This report provides an accurate prediction of the contribution of all the segments to the growth of the data qualit

  9. Employee Performance & Salary (Synthetic Dataset)

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Oct 10, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Mamun Hasan (2025). Employee Performance & Salary (Synthetic Dataset) [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/mamunhasan2cs/employee-performance-and-salary-synthetic-dataset
    Explore at:
    zip(13002 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 10, 2025
    Authors
    Mamun Hasan
    License

    https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

    Description

    🧑‍💼 Employee Performance and Salary Dataset

    This synthetic dataset simulates employee information in a medium-sized organization, designed specifically for data preprocessing and exploratory data analysis (EDA) tasks in Data Mining and Machine Learning labs.

    It includes over 1,000 employee records with realistic variations in age, gender, department, experience, performance score, and salary — along with missing values, duplicates, and outliers to mimic real-world data quality issues.

    📊 Columns Description

    Column NameDescription
    Employee_IDUnique employee identifier (E0001, E0002, …)
    AgeEmployee age (22–60 years)
    GenderGender of the employee (Male/Female)
    DepartmentDepartment where the employee works (HR, Finance, IT, Marketing, Sales, Operations)
    Experience_YearsTotal years of work experience (contains missing values)
    Performance_ScoreEmployee performance score (0–100, contains missing values)
    SalaryAnnual salary in USD (contains outliers)

    🧠 Example Lab Tasks

    • Identify and impute missing values using mean or median.
    • Detect and remove duplicate employee records.
    • Detect outliers in Salary using IQR or Z-score.
    • Normalize Salary and Performance_Score using Min-Max scaling.
    • Encode categorical columns (Gender, Department) for model training.
    • Ideal for Regression

    🎯 Possible Regression Targets (Dependent Variables)

    Salary → Predict salary based on experience, performance, department, and age. Performance_Score → Predict employee performance based on age, experience, and department.

    🧩 Example Regression Problem

    Predict the employee's salary based on their experience, performance score, and department.

    🧠 Sample Features:

    X = ['Age', 'Experience_Years', 'Performance_Score', 'Department', 'Gender'] y = ['Salary']

    You can apply:

    • Linear Regression
    • Ridge/Lasso Regression
    • Random Forest Regressor
    • XGBoost Regressor
    • SVR (Support Vector Regression)
    • and evaluate with metrics like:

    R², MAE, MSE, RMSE, and residual plots.

  10. f

    Examples of Check Specifications.

    • plos.figshare.com
    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    xls
    Updated Jun 27, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Hanieh Razzaghi; Amy Goodwin Davies; Samuel Boss; H. Timothy Bunnell; Yong Chen; Elizabeth A. Chrischilles; Kimberley Dickinson; David Hanauer; Yungui Huang; K. T. Sandra Ilunga; Chryso Katsoufis; Harold Lehmann; Dominick J. Lemas; Kevin Matthews; Eneida A. Mendonca; Keith Morse; Daksha Ranade; Marc Rosenman; Bradley Taylor; Kellie Walters; Michelle R. Denburg; Christopher B. Forrest; L. Charles Bailey (2024). Examples of Check Specifications. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000527.t002
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 27, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS Digital Health
    Authors
    Hanieh Razzaghi; Amy Goodwin Davies; Samuel Boss; H. Timothy Bunnell; Yong Chen; Elizabeth A. Chrischilles; Kimberley Dickinson; David Hanauer; Yungui Huang; K. T. Sandra Ilunga; Chryso Katsoufis; Harold Lehmann; Dominick J. Lemas; Kevin Matthews; Eneida A. Mendonca; Keith Morse; Daksha Ranade; Marc Rosenman; Bradley Taylor; Kellie Walters; Michelle R. Denburg; Christopher B. Forrest; L. Charles Bailey
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Study-specific data quality testing is an essential part of minimizing analytic errors, particularly for studies making secondary use of clinical data. We applied a systematic and reproducible approach for study-specific data quality testing to the analysis plan for PRESERVE, a 15-site, EHR-based observational study of chronic kidney disease in children. This approach integrated widely adopted data quality concepts with healthcare-specific evaluation methods. We implemented two rounds of data quality assessment. The first produced high-level evaluation using aggregate results from a distributed query, focused on cohort identification and main analytic requirements. The second focused on extended testing of row-level data centralized for analysis. We systematized reporting and cataloguing of data quality issues, providing institutional teams with prioritized issues for resolution. We tracked improvements and documented anomalous data for consideration during analyses. The checks we developed identified 115 and 157 data quality issues in the two rounds, involving completeness, data model conformance, cross-variable concordance, consistency, and plausibility, extending traditional data quality approaches to address more complex stratification and temporal patterns. Resolution efforts focused on higher priority issues, given finite study resources. In many cases, institutional teams were able to correct data extraction errors or obtain additional data, avoiding exclusion of 2 institutions entirely and resolving 123 other gaps. Other results identified complexities in measures of kidney function, bearing on the study’s outcome definition. Where limitations such as these are intrinsic to clinical data, the study team must account for them in conducting analyses. This study rigorously evaluated fitness of data for intended use. The framework is reusable and built on a strong theoretical underpinning. Significant data quality issues that would have otherwise delayed analyses or made data unusable were addressed. This study highlights the need for teams combining subject-matter and informatics expertise to address data quality when working with real world data.

  11. f

    Living Standards Survey, Wave 3 (extension), 2007-2008 - Timor-Leste

    • microdata.fao.org
    Updated Nov 8, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    National Statistics Directorate (2022). Living Standards Survey, Wave 3 (extension), 2007-2008 - Timor-Leste [Dataset]. https://microdata.fao.org/index.php/catalog/1507
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 8, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    National Statistics Directorate
    Time period covered
    2007 - 2008
    Area covered
    Timor-Leste
    Description

    Abstract

    In 2007-2008 a multi-topic household survey, the Timor Leste Living Standards Survey (LSS-2) was conducted in East Timor with the main objectives of developing a system of poverty monitoring and supporting poverty reduction, and to monitor human development indicators and progress toward the Millennium Development Goals. The LSS-3 extension survey was designed to re-visit one third of the households interviewed under the LSS-2 to explore different facets of household welfare and behaviour in the country, while also being able to make use of information collected in the LSS-2 survey for analytic purposes. The four new topics investigated in the extension survey are:

    • Risk and Vulnerability: This section is designed to help us understand the dimensions and sources of household-level vulnerability to uninsured risks in Timor Leste, and the efficacy and welfare effects of various risk-management strategies (prevention, mitigation, coping) and mechanisms (private as well as public, formal as well as informal) households do (or do not) have access to. The work in Timor Leste is part of a program of analytic work and policy dialogue throughout the EAP region, more information on which can be found on the World Bank website.
    • Land Degradation and Poverty: This section of the questionnaire is designed to identify proximate causes of deforestation through land use patterns and links with poverty; understand strengths and failures of common land resource management institutions (property rights, enforcement); understand the impact of the Siam Weed problem on household welfare.
    • Justice for Poor: The Justice for the Poor/Access to Justice (J4P/A2J) module of the survey will serve mainly as an initial diagnostic for project development in the country. The topics we would be interested in covering would be Dispute Processing/Resolution; Social Legal Norms and Perceptions of Efficiency in Government (Local, Sub-District, District and National level).
    • Access to Financial Services: The financial service work has the following two objectives: (i) to collect data on access to and use financial services (savings and credit), both formal and informal, and (ii) assess the quality of information on access to financial services obtained from head of households vs. from all adults - i.e. is there a bias introduced by not asking all household members, do the characteristics of the head or the household affect this (gender, age, nuclear family, urban, education levels, wealth, etc.).

    Geographic coverage

    National coverage

    Analysis unit

    Households

    Kind of data

    Sample survey data [ssd]

    Sampling procedure

    SAMPLE DESIGN FOR THE 2008 EXTENSION SURVEY

    Sampling for the LSS-3 Extension survey was a sub-sample of the original LSS-“ sample. The LSS-2 field work was divided into 52 "weeks", with each week being a random subset of the total sample. The sub-sample was chosen by randomly selecting 19 weeks from the original field work schedule. Each week contained seven Primary Sampling Units (PSUs) for a total of 133 PSUs. In each PSU the teams were to interview 12 of the original 15 households, with the remaining three to serve as replacements. The total nominal sample size was thus 1596.

    Additional interviews: Following the collection and initial analysis of the data, it was determined that data from one district, Manatuto, and partially from another district, Oecussi, were of insufficient quality in certain modules. Therefore, it was decided to repeat the survey in another 25 PSUs of these two districts - six in Manatuto, and 19 in Oecussi. The additional PSUs chosen were randomly selected within the two districts from the remaining non-panel PSUs in the original LSS-2 sample.

    Mode of data collection

    Face-to-face [f2f]

    Cleaning operations

    DATA CLEANING

    The LSS-3 had a significant number of responses in which the response is "other". In general, if the response clear fit into a pre-coded response category, it was recoded into that category during the cleaning and compilation process. Some responses where additional information was provided were not recoded even though they clearly fit into pre-coded categories. For example, agriculture project" would be recoded into the "agriculture" category, while "community garden" would not. Data users can either use the additional information, or re-code into categories as they see fit. Potential Data Quality Issues in 2008 Extension survey

    Data appraisal

    Potential Data Quality Issues in 2008 Extension survey

    Agriculture: Similarly, to the individual roster of the previous section, the plots listed in the previous survey are listed on the pre-printed cover page and all changes noted. The agricultural section, similarly, to the other sections, suffers from problems with open-ended questions. This is particularly the case for the question asking what community restrictions are placed on the clearing of forest land (section 2d). The translation from the original question was vague (using the Tetun word for "boundary" for "restriction,") and therefore many of the responses relate to physical boundaries on the land, such as stone walls and tree lines. Additionally, the translation of all answers from Tetun into English is imperfect, and those wishing to use this information for analytical purposes are advised to also refer to the original Tetun. Analysts should be careful in using the data from the open ended questions because of translation problems. Also, it was noted during the training and field work that many interviewers had significant difficulties understanding definitions with some of the land management and investment questions. In general, however, all agricultural data may be used for analysis, sampling weights w3.

    Finance: It should be noted that the quality of the data for the finance experiment (comparing the knowledge of the household head to that of other household members) was not sufficient for the experiment to be deemed a success. Subsequent spot-checking revealed that in many cases, interviewers asked the household head about the financial activities of various household members instead of asking them directly. Therefore, this data should only be used to measure the access to finance at the household level. The finance sections were not repeated during the additional interviews in the replacement PSUs. Sampling weights w1 should be used when doing any analysis with this data.

    Shocks and Vulnerability: It was determined following the initial round of data collection that the shocks and vulnerability module had some issues with uneven interview quality. Two reasons were listed as potential causes of the data quality issues: (1) fundamental inability to adequately translate both the word and concept of a "shock" into the Timorese context, and (2) incomplete / questionable responses to the health shock questions in particular. Analysis for health shocks should drop the "questionable" households and use the "re-interview" households, sampling weights w2.

    Justice for the Poor: Similar to the shocks and vulnerability module, the justice module included a long series of follow up questions if the household indicated having experienced a dispute during the recall period. Again, the number of disputes experienced by the household seemed extremely low compared to expectations. This was particularly a problem with the Manatuto district in which no disputes were recorded during the first set of TLSLS2-X interviews. Analysis for the disputes section of the justice module should drop the "questionable" households and use the "re-interview" households, sampling weights w2. The justice model also has a number of instances in which the specifications for "other" were not recorded. Every effort was made to ensure this data was as complete as possible, but gaps do remain. Also, data users should use caution when using the imputed rank variable in section 5D. The rank in terms of importance was not explicitly captured in the data entry software, and the rankings therefore had to be imputed from the order they were listed in the original data entry. Inconsistencies may exist in this variable.

  12. G

    Real-Time Data Quality Monitoring Tools Market Research Report 2033

    • growthmarketreports.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Oct 7, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Growth Market Reports (2025). Real-Time Data Quality Monitoring Tools Market Research Report 2033 [Dataset]. https://growthmarketreports.com/report/real-time-data-quality-monitoring-tools-market
    Explore at:
    csv, pdf, pptxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 7, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Growth Market Reports
    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Real-Time Data Quality Monitoring Tools Market Outlook



    According to our latest research, the global Real-Time Data Quality Monitoring Tools market size reached USD 1.86 billion in 2024, reflecting robust adoption across diverse industries. The market is poised for significant expansion, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 17.2% projected from 2025 to 2033. By the end of 2033, the market is expected to reach a substantial USD 7.18 billion. This rapid growth is primarily driven by the escalating need for high-quality, reliable data to fuel real-time analytics and decision-making in increasingly digital enterprises.




    One of the foremost growth factors propelling the Real-Time Data Quality Monitoring Tools market is the exponential surge in data volumes generated by organizations worldwide. With the proliferation of IoT devices, cloud computing, and digital transformation initiatives, businesses are inundated with massive streams of structured and unstructured data. Ensuring the accuracy, consistency, and reliability of this data in real time has become mission-critical, especially for industries such as BFSI, healthcare, and retail, where data-driven decisions directly impact operational efficiency and regulatory compliance. As organizations recognize the business value of clean, actionable data, investments in advanced data quality monitoring tools continue to accelerate.




    Another significant driver is the increasing complexity of data ecosystems. Modern enterprises operate in a landscape characterized by hybrid IT environments, multi-cloud architectures, and a multitude of data sources. This complexity introduces new challenges in maintaining data integrity across disparate systems, applications, and platforms. Real-Time Data Quality Monitoring Tools are being adopted to address these challenges through automated rule-based validation, anomaly detection, and continuous data profiling. These capabilities empower organizations to proactively identify and resolve data quality issues before they can propagate downstream, ultimately reducing costs associated with poor data quality and enhancing business agility.




    Moreover, the growing emphasis on regulatory compliance and data governance is fostering the adoption of real-time data quality solutions. Industries such as banking, healthcare, and government are subject to stringent regulations regarding data accuracy, privacy, and reporting. Non-compliance can result in severe financial penalties and reputational damage. Real-Time Data Quality Monitoring Tools enable organizations to maintain audit trails, enforce data quality policies, and demonstrate compliance with evolving regulatory frameworks such as GDPR, HIPAA, and Basel III. As data governance becomes a board-level priority, the demand for comprehensive, real-time monitoring solutions is expected to remain strong.




    Regionally, North America dominates the Real-Time Data Quality Monitoring Tools market, accounting for the largest share in 2024, thanks to the presence of leading technology vendors, high digital maturity, and early adoption of advanced analytics. Europe and Asia Pacific are also experiencing substantial growth, driven by increasing investments in digital infrastructure and a rising focus on data-driven decision-making. Emerging markets in Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are showing promising potential, supported by government digitalization initiatives and expanding enterprise IT budgets. This global expansion underscores the universal need for reliable, high-quality data across all regions and industries.





    Component Analysis



    The Real-Time Data Quality Monitoring Tools market is segmented by component into software and services, each playing a pivotal role in the overall ecosystem. The software segment holds the lion’s share of the market, as organizations increasingly deploy advanced platforms that provide automated data profiling, cleansing, validation, and enrichment functionalities. These software solutions are continuously evolving, incorporating artificial inte

  13. Insurance Dataset for Data Engineering Practice

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Sep 24, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    KPOVIESI Olaolouwa Amiche Stéphane (2025). Insurance Dataset for Data Engineering Practice [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/kpoviesistphane/insurance-dataset-for-data-engineering-practice
    Explore at:
    zip(475362 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 24, 2025
    Authors
    KPOVIESI Olaolouwa Amiche Stéphane
    License

    Apache License, v2.0https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Insurance Dataset for Data Engineering Practice

    Overview

    A realistic synthetic French insurance dataset specifically designed for practicing data cleaning, transformation, and analytics with PySpark and other big data tools. This dataset contains intentional data quality issues commonly found in real-world insurance data.

    Dataset Contents

    📊 Three Main Tables:

    • contracts.csv (~15,000 rows) - Insurance contracts with client information
    • claims.csv (~6,000 rows) - Insurance claims with damage and settlement details
    • vehicles.csv (~12,000 rows) - Vehicle information for auto insurance contracts

    🗺️ Geographic Coverage:

    • French cities with realistic postal codes
    • Risk zone classifications (High/Medium/Low)
    • Regional pricing coefficients

    🏷️ Product Types:

    • Auto Insurance (majority)
    • Home Insurance
    • Life Insurance
    • Health Insurance

    🎯 Intentional Data Quality Issues

    Perfect for practicing data cleaning and transformation:

    Date Format Issues:

    • Mixed formats: 2024-01-15, 15/01/2024, 01/15/2024
    • String storage requiring parsing and standardization

    Price Format Inconsistencies:

    • Multiple currency formats: 1250.50€, €1250.50, 1250.50 EUR, $1375.55
    • Missing currency symbols: 1250.50
    • Written formats: 1250.50 euros

    Missing Data Patterns:

    • Strategic missingness in age (8%), CSP (12%), expert_id (20-25%)
    • Realistic patterns based on business logic

    Categorical Inconsistencies:

    • Gender: M, F, Male, Female, empty strings
    • Power units: 150 HP, 150hp, 150 CV, 111 kW, missing values

    Data Type Issues:

    • Numeric values stored as strings
    • Mixed data types requiring casting

    🚀 Perfect for Practicing:

    PySpark Operations:

    • to_date() and date parsing functions
    • regexp_replace() for price cleaning
    • when().otherwise() conditional logic
    • cast() for data type conversions
    • fillna() and dropna() strategies

    Data Engineering Tasks:

    • ETL pipeline development
    • Data validation and quality checks
    • Join operations across related tables
    • Aggregation with business logic
    • Data standardization workflows

    Analytics & ML:

    • Customer segmentation
    • Claim frequency analysis
    • Premium pricing models
    • Risk assessment by geography
    • Churn prediction

    🏢 Business Context

    Realistic insurance business rules implemented: - Age-based premium adjustments - Geographic risk zone pricing - Product-specific claim patterns - Seasonal claim distributions - Client lifecycle status transitions

    💡 Use Cases:

    • Data Engineering Bootcamps: Hands-on PySpark practice
    • SQL Training: Complex joins and aggregations
    • Data Science Projects: End-to-end ML pipeline development
    • Business Intelligence: Dashboard and reporting practice
    • Data Quality Workshops: Cleaning and validation techniques

    🔧 Tools Compatibility:

    • Apache Spark / PySpark
    • Pandas / Python
    • SQL databases
    • Databricks
    • Google Cloud Dataflow
    • AWS Glue

    📈 Difficulty Level:

    Intermediate - Suitable for learners with basic Python/SQL knowledge ready to tackle real-world data challenges.

    Generated with realistic French business context and intentional quality issues for educational purposes. All data is synthetic and does not represent real individuals or companies.

  14. Fitness Classification Dataset (Synthetic)

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Aug 1, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Mohammed Darrige (2025). Fitness Classification Dataset (Synthetic) [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/muhammedderric/fitness-classification-dataset-synthetic/data
    Explore at:
    zip(34176 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 1, 2025
    Authors
    Mohammed Darrige
    License

    https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

    Description

    Real-World Style Fitness Classification Dataset (Synthetic)

    Dataset Description

    This synthetic dataset simulates a real-world binary classification problem where the goal is to predict whether a person is fit (is_fit = 1) or not fit (is_fit = 0) based on various health and lifestyle features.

    The dataset contains 2000 samples with a mixture of numerical and categorical features, some of which include noisy, inconsistent, or missing values to reflect real-life data challenges. This design enables users, especially beginners, to practice data preprocessing, feature engineering, and building classification models such as neural networks.

    Features have both linear and non-linear relationships with the target variable. Some features have complex interactions and the target is generated using a sigmoid-like function with added noise, making it a challenging but realistic task. The dataset also includes mixed data types (e.g., the "smokes" column contains both numeric and string values) and some outliers are present.

    This dataset is ideal for users wanting to improve skills in cleaning messy data, encoding categorical variables, handling missing values, detecting outliers, and training classification models including neural networks.

    Column Descriptions

    Column NameDescription
    ageAge of the individual in years (integer)
    height_cmHeight in centimeters (integer)
    weight_kgWeight in kilograms (integer, contains some outliers)
    heart_rateResting heart rate in beats per minute (float)
    blood_pressureSystolic blood pressure in mmHg (float)
    sleep_hoursAverage hours of sleep per day (float, may contain NaNs)
    nutrition_qualityDaily nutrition quality score between 0 and 10 (float)
    activity_indexPhysical activity level score between 1 and 5 (float)
    smokesSmoking status (mixed types: 0, 1, "yes", "no")
    genderGender of individual, either 'M' or 'F'
    is_fitTarget variable: 1 if the person is fit, 0 otherwise

    Dataset Statistics

    • Total samples: 2000
    • Features: 10 (9 predictive features + 1 target)
    • Target distribution: Approximately 60% not fit (0), 40% fit (1)
    • Missing values: ~8% missing values in sleep_hours column
    • Data types: Mixed (integers, floats, strings)
    • Outliers: Present in weight_kg column (~2% of samples)

    Data Quality Issues (Intentional)

    This dataset intentionally includes several data quality issues to simulate real-world scenarios:

    1. Mixed data types: The 'smokes' column contains both numeric (0, 1) and string ("yes", "no") values
    2. Missing values: The 'sleep_hours' column has approximately 8% missing values
    3. Outliers: The 'weight_kg' column contains some extreme values (very low or very high weights)
    4. Noise: All features contain some level of noise to make the classification task more realistic

    Suggested Data Preprocessing Steps

    1. Handle mixed data types: Convert the 'smokes' column to a consistent format
    2. Deal with missing values: Impute or remove missing values in 'sleep_hours'
    3. Outlier detection: Identify and handle outliers in 'weight_kg'
    4. Feature engineering: Consider creating BMI from height and weight
    5. Encoding: One-hot encode categorical variables like 'gender'
    6. Scaling: Normalize or standardize numerical features for neural networks

    Potential Use Cases

    • Binary classification: Predict fitness status
    • Data preprocessing practice: Clean and prepare messy data
    • Feature engineering: Create new meaningful features
    • Model comparison: Compare different classification algorithms
    • Neural network training: Practice building and tuning neural networks
    • Exploratory data analysis: Understand relationships between health metrics

    Model Performance Expectations

    Due to the synthetic nature and intentional noise, expect: - Baseline accuracy: ~60% (majority class) - Good models: 75-85% accuracy - Excellent models: 85-90% accuracy

    The dataset is designed to be challenging but achievable, making it perfect for learning and experimentation.

    License

    This dataset is provided under the CC0 Public Domain license, making it suitable for educational and research purposes without restrictions.

    Acknowledgments

    This is a synthetic dataset created for educational purposes. It does not contain real personal health information and is designed to help users practice data science skills in a safe, privacy-compliant environment.

  15. Urban Water Data - Drought Planning and Management

    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated Jul 24, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    California Department of Water Resources (2025). Urban Water Data - Drought Planning and Management [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/urban-water-data-drought-planning-and-management-8f7da
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 24, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    California Department of Water Resourceshttp://www.water.ca.gov/
    Description

    This data package aims to pilot an approach for providing usable data for analyses related to drought planning and management for urban water suppliers--ultimately contributing to improvements in communication around drought. This project was convened by the California Water Data Consortium in partnership with the Department of Water Resources (DWR) and the State Water Resources and Control Board (SWB) and is one of two use cases of this working group that aim to improve data submitted by urban water suppliers in terms of accessibility and useability. The datasets from DWR and the SWB are compiled in a standard format to allow interested parties to synthesize and analyze these data into a cohesive message. This package includes a data management plan describing its development and maintenance. All code related to preparing this data package can be found on GitHub. Please note that the "org_id" (DWR's Organization ID) and the "pwsid" (SWB's Public Water System ID) can be used to connect to the various data tables in this package. We acknowledge that data quality issues may exist. Making these data available in a usable format will help identify and address data quality issues. If you identify any data quality issues, please contact the data steward (see contact information). We plan to iteratively update this data package to incorporate new data and to update existing data with quality fixes. The purpose of this project is to demonstrate how data from two agencies, when made publicly available, can be used in relevant analyses; if you found this data package useful, please contact the data steward (see contact information) to share your experience.

  16. Google Ads sales dataset

    • kaggle.com
    Updated Jul 22, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    NayakGanesh007 (2025). Google Ads sales dataset [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/nayakganesh007/google-ads-sales-dataset
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Jul 22, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Kagglehttp://kaggle.com/
    Authors
    NayakGanesh007
    License

    https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

    Description

    Google Ads Sales Dataset for Data Analytics Campaigns (Raw & Uncleaned) 📝 Dataset Overview This dataset contains raw, uncleaned advertising data from a simulated Google Ads campaign promoting data analytics courses and services. It closely mimics what real digital marketers and analysts would encounter when working with exported campaign data — including typos, formatting issues, missing values, and inconsistencies.

    It is ideal for practicing:

    Data cleaning

    Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA)

    Marketing analytics

    Campaign performance insights

    Dashboard creation using tools like Excel, Python, or Power BI

    📁 Columns in the Dataset Column Name ----- -Description Ad_ID --------Unique ID of the ad campaign Campaign_Name ------Name of the campaign (with typos and variations) Clicks --Number of clicks received Impressions --Number of ad impressions Cost --Total cost of the ad (in ₹ or $ format with missing values) Leads ---Number of leads generated Conversions ----Number of actual conversions (signups, sales, etc.) Conversion Rate ---Calculated conversion rate (Conversions ÷ Clicks) Sale_Amount ---Revenue generated from the conversions Ad_Date------ Date of the ad activity (in inconsistent formats like YYYY/MM/DD, DD-MM-YY) Location ------------City where the ad was served (includes spelling/case variations) Device------------ Device type (Mobile, Desktop, Tablet with mixed casing) Keyword ----------Keyword that triggered the ad (with typos)

    ⚠️ Data Quality Issues (Intentional) This dataset was intentionally left raw and uncleaned to reflect real-world messiness, such as:

    Inconsistent date formats

    Spelling errors (e.g., "analitics", "anaytics")

    Duplicate rows

    Mixed units and symbols in cost/revenue columns

    Missing values

    Irregular casing in categorical fields (e.g., "mobile", "Mobile", "MOBILE")

    🎯 Use Cases Data cleaning exercises in Python (Pandas), R, Excel

    Data preprocessing for machine learning

    Campaign performance analysis

    Conversion optimization tracking

    Building dashboards in Power BI, Tableau, or Looker

    💡 Sample Analysis Ideas Track campaign cost vs. return (ROI)

    Analyze click-through rates (CTR) by device or location

    Clean and standardize campaign names and keywords

    Investigate keyword performance vs. conversions

    🔖 Tags Digital Marketing · Google Ads · Marketing Analytics · Data Cleaning · Pandas Practice · Business Analytics · CRM Data

  17. Urban Water Data - Drought Planning and Management

    • data.cnra.ca.gov
    • data.ca.gov
    • +1more
    csv, pdf
    Updated Jun 23, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    California Department of Water Resources (2025). Urban Water Data - Drought Planning and Management [Dataset]. https://data.cnra.ca.gov/dataset/urban-water-data-drought
    Explore at:
    csv(854900), csv(973570), csv(210742), csv(92302038), pdf(123720), csv(1046715)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 23, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    California Department of Water Resourceshttp://www.water.ca.gov/
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This data package aims to pilot an approach for providing usable data for analyses related to drought planning and management for urban water suppliers--ultimately contributing to improvements in communication around drought. This project was convened by the California Water Data Consortium in partnership with the Department of Water Resources (DWR) and the State Water Resources and Control Board (SWB) and is one of two use cases of this working group that aim to improve data submitted by urban water suppliers in terms of accessibility and useability. The datasets from DWR and the SWB are compiled in a standard format to allow interested parties to synthesize and analyze these data into a cohesive message. This package includes a data management plan describing its development and maintenance. All code related to preparing this data package can be found on GitHub. Please note that the "org_id" (DWR's Organization ID) and the "pwsid" (SWB's Public Water System ID) can be used to connect to the various data tables in this package.

    We acknowledge that data quality issues may exist. Making these data available in a usable format will help identify and address data quality issues. If you identify any data quality issues, please contact the data steward (see contact information). We plan to iteratively update this data package to incorporate new data and to update existing data with quality fixes. The purpose of this project is to demonstrate how data from two agencies, when made publicly available, can be used in relevant analyses; if you found this data package useful, please contact the data steward (see contact information) to share your experience.

  18. G

    AML Data Quality Solutions Market Research Report 2033

    • growthmarketreports.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Aug 22, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Growth Market Reports (2025). AML Data Quality Solutions Market Research Report 2033 [Dataset]. https://growthmarketreports.com/report/aml-data-quality-solutions-market
    Explore at:
    csv, pdf, pptxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 22, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Growth Market Reports
    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    AML Data Quality Solutions Market Outlook



    According to our latest research, the global AML Data Quality Solutions market size in 2024 stands at USD 2.42 billion. The market is experiencing robust expansion, propelled by increasing regulatory demands and the proliferation of sophisticated financial crimes. The Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) for the market is estimated at 16.8% from 2025 to 2033, setting the stage for the market to reach USD 7.23 billion by 2033. This growth is largely driven by heightened awareness of anti-money laundering (AML) compliance, growing digital transactions, and the urgent need for advanced data quality management in financial ecosystems.




    A primary growth factor for the AML Data Quality Solutions market is the escalating stringency of regulatory frameworks worldwide. Regulatory bodies such as the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), the European Union’s AML directives, and the U.S. Bank Secrecy Act are continuously updating compliance requirements, compelling organizations, particularly in the BFSI sector, to adopt robust AML data quality solutions. These regulations demand not only accurate and timely reporting but also comprehensive monitoring and management of customer and transactional data. As a result, organizations are investing heavily in advanced AML data quality software and services to ensure compliance, minimize risk, and avoid hefty penalties. The growing complexity of money laundering techniques further underscores the necessity for sophisticated data quality solutions capable of identifying and flagging suspicious activities in real time.




    Another significant driver is the exponential growth in digital transactions and the adoption of digital banking services. The proliferation of online and mobile banking, digital wallets, and cross-border transactions has expanded the attack surface for financial crimes. This digital transformation is creating vast volumes of structured and unstructured data, making it challenging for organizations to ensure data accuracy, completeness, and consistency. AML data quality solutions equipped with advanced analytics, artificial intelligence, and machine learning algorithms are becoming indispensable for detecting anomalies, reducing false positives, and streamlining compliance processes. The ability to integrate with existing IT infrastructure and provide real-time data validation is also a key factor accelerating market adoption across various industry verticals.




    The market’s growth is further fueled by the rising integration of AML data quality solutions across non-banking sectors such as healthcare, government, and retail. These sectors are increasingly recognizing the importance of robust data quality management to prevent fraud, ensure regulatory compliance, and maintain operational integrity. In healthcare, for instance, the adoption of AML data quality solutions is driven by the need to combat insurance fraud and money laundering through medical billing. In government, these solutions are critical for monitoring public funds and detecting illicit financial flows. The expansion of AML regulations to cover a broader range of industries is expected to sustain high demand for data quality solutions throughout the forecast period.




    From a regional perspective, North America currently dominates the AML Data Quality Solutions market, accounting for the largest share in 2024. This leadership is attributed to the presence of major financial institutions, a mature regulatory environment, and early adoption of advanced AML technologies. Europe follows closely, driven by stringent AML directives and the increasing adoption of digital banking. The Asia Pacific region is projected to witness the fastest growth during the forecast period, fueled by rapid digitalization, expanding financial services, and rising regulatory enforcement in countries like China, India, and Singapore. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are also showing increasing adoption, although market penetration remains comparatively lower due to infrastructural and regulatory challenges.





    <h2 id=&#

  19. Netflix 2025:User Behavior Dataset (210K+ Records)

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Aug 2, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    sayeeduddin (2025). Netflix 2025:User Behavior Dataset (210K+ Records) [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/sayeeduddin/netflix-2025user-behavior-dataset-210k-records/code
    Explore at:
    zip(4212139 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 2, 2025
    Authors
    sayeeduddin
    License

    https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

    Description

    🎬 Netflix-Style Synthetic Dataset: 210K+ Records with Real-World Data Challenges

    A comprehensive streaming platform simulation designed specifically for data science education and machine learning practice.

    🎯 What Makes This Dataset Special?

    This isn't just another clean dataset - it's specifically crafted with realistic data quality issues that mirror what data scientists encounter in production environments. Perfect for learning data cleaning, preprocessing, and building robust ML pipelines.

    📊 Dataset Structure (6 Interconnected Tables)

    FileRecordsDescriptionKey Learning Opportunities
    users.csv10,300Demographics + subscriptionsMissing values, duplicates, outliers in age/spending
    movies.csv1,040Content metadata + ratingsMissing genres, budget outliers, inconsistent formats
    watch_history.csv105,000Viewing sessions & behaviorBinge patterns, device preferences, incomplete sessions
    recommendation_logs.csv52,000Algorithm recommendationsClick-through analysis, A/B testing data
    search_logs.csv26,500User search queriesTypos, failed searches, query optimization
    reviews.csv15,450Text reviews + sentimentNLP preprocessing, sentiment classification

    🎲 Intentional Data Quality Challenges

    • Missing Values: 10-20% across different fields (realistic patterns)
    • Duplicates: 3-6% duplicate records (user behavior simulation)
    • Outliers: Age extremes, spending anomalies, viewing marathons
    • Inconsistencies: Typos, format variations, incomplete entries
    • Temporal Patterns: Seasonal viewing, weekend binges, holiday spikes

    🚀 Perfect For These ML Projects

    🎯 Classification & Prediction

    • User churn prediction
    • Content genre classification
    • Sentiment analysis on reviews
    • Click-through rate prediction

    🤖 Recommendation Systems

    • Collaborative filtering
    • Content-based recommendations
    • Hybrid recommendation models
    • Neural collaborative filtering

    📈 Time Series & Analytics

    • Viewing pattern forecasting
    • Seasonal trend analysis
    • User engagement metrics
    • Content popularity prediction

    🧹 Data Engineering

    • Data cleaning workflows
    • ETL pipeline development
    • Data quality assessment
    • Feature engineering practice

    🌍 Geographic & Temporal Scope

    • Regions: USA (70%) and Canada (30%) with realistic distributions
    • Time Range: 2024-2025 viewing data
    • Languages: English reviews and search queries
    • Devices: Mobile, TV, Desktop, Tablet usage patterns

    🔗 Data Relationships

    All tables are connected through user_id and movie_id foreign keys, enabling: - Cross-table analysis and joins - User journey mapping - Content performance correlation - Comprehensive user profiling

    💡 Sample Analysis Ideas

    # Quick start examples included in README:
    # 1. User segmentation by viewing behavior
    # 2. Content recommendation accuracy analysis 
    # 3. Search query optimization
    # 4. Seasonal viewing pattern detection
    # 5. Sentiment-driven content rating prediction
    
  20. AI In Data Quality Market Analysis, Size, and Forecast 2025-2029: North...

    • technavio.com
    pdf
    Updated Aug 22, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Technavio (2025). AI In Data Quality Market Analysis, Size, and Forecast 2025-2029: North America (US and Canada), Europe (France, Germany, Italy, and UK), APAC (China, India, Japan, and South Korea), and Rest of World (ROW) [Dataset]. https://www.technavio.com/report/ai-in-data-quality-market-industry-analysis
    Explore at:
    pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 22, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    TechNavio
    Authors
    Technavio
    License

    https://www.technavio.com/content/privacy-noticehttps://www.technavio.com/content/privacy-notice

    Time period covered
    2025 - 2029
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Snapshot img

    AI In Data Quality Market Size 2025-2029

    The ai in data quality market size is valued to increase by USD 1.9 billion, at a CAGR of 22.9% from 2024 to 2029. Proliferation of big data and escalating data complexity will drive the ai in data quality market.

    Major Market Trends & Insights

    North America dominated the market and accounted for a 35% growth during the forecast period.
    By Deployment - Cloud-based segment accounted for the largest market revenue share in 2023
    CAGR from 2024 to 2029 : 22.9%
    

    Market Summary

    In the realm of data management, the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in data quality has emerged as a game-changer. According to recent estimates, The market is projected to reach a value of USD12.2 billion by 2025, underscoring its growing significance. This growth is driven by the proliferation of big data and escalating data complexity. AI's ability to analyze vast amounts of data and extract valuable insights has become indispensable for businesses seeking to enhance their data quality and gain a competitive edge. The fusion of generative AI and natural language interfaces is another key trend.
    This development enables more intuitive and user-friendly interactions with data, making it easier for businesses to identify and address data quality issues. However, the complexity of integrating AI with heterogeneous and legacy IT environments poses a significant challenge. Despite these hurdles, the future direction of AI in data quality is undeniably forward. As businesses continue to grapple with the intricacies of managing and leveraging their data, the role of AI in ensuring data quality and accuracy will only become more essential.
    

    What will be the Size of the AI In Data Quality Market during the forecast period?

    Get Key Insights on Market Forecast (PDF) Request Free Sample

    How is the AI In Data Quality Market Segmented and what are the key trends of market segmentation?

    The ai in data quality industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD million' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments.

    Component
    
      Software
      Services
    
    
    Deployment
    
      Cloud-based
      On premises
    
    
    Industry Application
    
      BFSI
      IT and telecommunications
      Healthcare
      Retail and e commerce
      Others
    
    
    Geography
    
      North America
    
        US
        Canada
    
    
      Europe
    
        France
        Germany
        Italy
        UK
    
    
      APAC
    
        China
        India
        Japan
        South Korea
    
    
      Rest of World (ROW)
    

    By Component Insights

    The software segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.

    The market continues to evolve, with the software segment driving innovation. This segment encompasses platforms, tools, and applications that automate data integrity processes. Traditional rule-based systems have given way to AI-driven solutions, which autonomously monitor data quality. The software segment can be divided into standalone platforms, integrated modules, and embedded features. Standalone platforms offer end-to-end capabilities, while integrated modules function within larger data management or governance suites. Embedded features, found in cloud data warehouses and lakehouse platforms, provide AI-powered checks as native functionalities. In 2021, the market size for AI-driven data quality solutions was estimated at USD3.5 billion, reflecting the growing importance of maintaining data accuracy and consistency.

    Request Free Sample

    Regional Analysis

    North America is estimated to contribute 35% to the growth of the global market during the forecast period.Technavio's analysts have elaborately explained the regional trends and drivers that shape the market during the forecast period.

    See How AI In Data Quality Market Demand is Rising in North America Request Free Sample

    The market is witnessing significant growth and evolution, with North America leading the charge. Comprising the United States and Canada, this region is home to the world's most advanced technology companies and a thriving venture capital ecosystem. This unique combination of technological expertise and investment has led to the early adoption of foundational technologies such as cloud computing, big data analytics, and machine learning. As a result, the North American market is characterized by a sophisticated customer base that recognizes the strategic value of data and the importance of its integrity.

    This growth is driven by the increasing demand for data accuracy, security, and compliance in various industries, including finance, healthcare IT, and retail. AI technologies, such as machine learning algorithms and natural language processing, are increasingly being used to improve data quality, enhance customer experiences, and drive business growth.

    Market Dynamics

    Our researchers analyzed

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Data Obsession (2025). Superstore Sales: The Data Quality Challenge [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/dataobsession/superstore-sales-the-data-quality-challenge
Organization logo

Superstore Sales: The Data Quality Challenge

Explore at:
zip(1512911 bytes)Available download formats
Dataset updated
Oct 25, 2025
Authors
Data Obsession
License

Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Description

Superstore Sales - The Data Quality Challenge Edition (25K Records)

This dataset is an expanded version of the popular "Sample - Superstore Sales" dataset, commonly used for introductory data analysis and visualization. It contains detailed transactional data for a US-based retail company, covering orders, products, and customer information.

This version is specifically designed for practicing Data Quality (DQ) and Data Wrangling skills, featuring a unique set of real-world "dirty data" problems (like those encountered in tools like SPSS Modeler, Tableau Prep, or Alteryx) that must be cleaned before any analysis or machine learning can begin.

This dataset combines the original Superstore data with 15,000 plausibly generated synthetic records, totaling 25,000 rows of transactional data. It includes 21 columns detailing: - Order Information: Order ID, Order Date, Ship Date, Ship Mode. - Customer Information: Customer ID, Customer Name, Segment. - Geographic Information: Country, City, State, Postal Code, Region. - Product Information: Product ID, Category, Sub-Category, Product Name. - Financial Metrics: Sales, Quantity, Discount, and Profit.

🚨 Introduced Data Quality Challenges (The Dirty Data)

This dataset is intentionally corrupted to provide a robust practice environment for data cleaning. Challenges include: Missing/Inconsistent Values: Deliberate gaps in Profit and Discount, and multiple inconsistent entries (-- or blank) in the Region column.

  • Data Type Mismatches: Order Date and Ship Date are stored as text strings, and the Profit column is polluted with comma-formatted strings (e.g., "1,234.56"), forcing the entire column to be read as an object (string) type.

  • Categorical Inconsistencies: The Category field contains variations and typos like "Tech", "technologies", "Furni", and "OfficeSupply" that require standardization.

  • Outliers and Invalid Data: Extreme outliers have been added to the Sales and Profit fields, alongside a subset of transactions with an invalid Sales value of 0.

  • Duplicate Records: Over 200 rows are duplicated (with slight financial variations) to test your deduplication logic.

❓ Suggested Analysis and Modeling Tasks

This dataset is ideal for:

Data Wrangling/Cleaning (Primary Focus): Fix all the intentional data quality issues before proceeding.

Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA): Analyze sales distribution by region, segment, and category.

Regression: Predict the Profit based on Sales, Discount, and product features.

Classification: Build an RFM Model (Recency, Frequency, Monetary) and create a target variable (HighValueCustomer = 1 if total sales are* $>$ $1000$*) to be predicted by logistical regression or decision trees.

Time Series Analysis: Aggregate sales by month/year to perform forecasting.

Acknowledgements

This dataset is an expanded and corrupted derivative of the original Sample Superstore dataset, credited to Tableau and widely shared for educational purposes. All synthetic records were generated to follow the plausible distribution of the original data.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu