The USDA Agricultural Research Service (ARS) recently established SCINet , which consists of a shared high performance computing resource, Ceres, and the dedicated high-speed Internet2 network used to access Ceres. Current and potential SCINet users are using and generating very large datasets so SCINet needs to be provisioned with adequate data storage for their active computing. It is not designed to hold data beyond active research phases. At the same time, the National Agricultural Library has been developing the Ag Data Commons, a research data catalog and repository designed for public data release and professional data curation. Ag Data Commons needs to anticipate the size and nature of data it will be tasked with handling. The ARS Web-enabled Databases Working Group, organized under the SCINet initiative, conducted a study to establish baseline data storage needs and practices, and to make projections that could inform future infrastructure design, purchases, and policies. The SCINet Web-enabled Databases Working Group helped develop the survey which is the basis for an internal report. While the report was for internal use, the survey and resulting data may be generally useful and are being released publicly. From October 24 to November 8, 2016 we administered a 17-question survey (Appendix A) by emailing a Survey Monkey link to all ARS Research Leaders, intending to cover data storage needs of all 1,675 SY (Category 1 and Category 4) scientists. We designed the survey to accommodate either individual researcher responses or group responses. Research Leaders could decide, based on their unit's practices or their management preferences, whether to delegate response to a data management expert in their unit, to all members of their unit, or to themselves collate responses from their unit before reporting in the survey. Larger storage ranges cover vastly different amounts of data so the implications here could be significant depending on whether the true amount is at the lower or higher end of the range. Therefore, we requested more detail from "Big Data users," those 47 respondents who indicated they had more than 10 to 100 TB or over 100 TB total current data (Q5). All other respondents are called "Small Data users." Because not all of these follow-up requests were successful, we used actual follow-up responses to estimate likely responses for those who did not respond. We defined active data as data that would be used within the next six months. All other data would be considered inactive, or archival. To calculate per person storage needs we used the high end of the reported range divided by 1 for an individual response, or by G, the number of individuals in a group response. For Big Data users we used the actual reported values or estimated likely values. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Appendix A: ARS data storage survey questions. File Name: Appendix A.pdfResource Description: The full list of questions asked with the possible responses. The survey was not administered using this PDF but the PDF was generated directly from the administered survey using the Print option under Design Survey. Asterisked questions were required. A list of Research Units and their associated codes was provided in a drop down not shown here. Resource Software Recommended: Adobe Acrobat,url: https://get.adobe.com/reader/ Resource Title: CSV of Responses from ARS Researcher Data Storage Survey. File Name: Machine-readable survey response data.csvResource Description: CSV file includes raw responses from the administered survey, as downloaded unfiltered from Survey Monkey, including incomplete responses. Also includes additional classification and calculations to support analysis. Individual email addresses and IP addresses have been removed. This information is that same data as in the Excel spreadsheet (also provided).Resource Title: Responses from ARS Researcher Data Storage Survey. File Name: Data Storage Survey Data for public release.xlsxResource Description: MS Excel worksheet that Includes raw responses from the administered survey, as downloaded unfiltered from Survey Monkey, including incomplete responses. Also includes additional classification and calculations to support analysis. Individual email addresses and IP addresses have been removed.Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://products.office.com/en-us/excel

Spatial analysis and statistical summaries of the Protected Areas Database of the United States (PAD-US) provide land managers and decision makers with a general assessment of management intent for biodiversity protection, natural resource management, and recreation access across the nation. The PAD-US 3.0 Combined Fee, Designation, Easement feature class (with Military Lands and Tribal Areas from the Proclamation and Other Planning Boundaries feature class) was modified to remove overlaps, avoiding overestimation in protected area statistics and to support user needs. A Python scripted process ("PADUS3_0_CreateVectorAnalysisFileScript.zip") associated with this data release prioritized overlapping designations (e.g. Wilderness within a National Forest) based upon their relative biodiversity conservation status (e.g. GAP Status Code 1 over 2), public access values (in the order of Closed, Restricted, Open, Unknown), and geodatabase load order (records are deliberately organized in the PAD-US full inventory with fee owned lands loaded before overlapping management designations, and easements). The Vector Analysis File ("PADUS3_0VectorAnalysisFile_ClipCensus.zip") associated item of PAD-US 3.0 Spatial Analysis and Statistics ( https://doi.org/10.5066/P9KLBB5D ) was clipped to the Census state boundary file to define the extent and serve as a common denominator for statistical summaries. Boundaries of interest to stakeholders (State, Department of the Interior Region, Congressional District, County, EcoRegions I-IV, Urban Areas, Landscape Conservation Cooperative) were incorporated into separate geodatabase feature classes to support various data summaries ("PADUS3_0VectorAnalysisFileOtherExtents_Clip_Census.zip") and Comma-separated Value (CSV) tables ("PADUS3_0SummaryStatistics_TabularData_CSV.zip") summarizing "PADUS3_0VectorAnalysisFileOtherExtents_Clip_Census.zip" are provided as an alternative format and enable users to explore and download summary statistics of interest (Comma-separated Table [CSV], Microsoft Excel Workbook [.XLSX], Portable Document Format [.PDF] Report) from the PAD-US Lands and Inland Water Statistics Dashboard ( https://www.usgs.gov/programs/gap-analysis-project/science/pad-us-statistics ). In addition, a "flattened" version of the PAD-US 3.0 combined file without other extent boundaries ("PADUS3_0VectorAnalysisFile_ClipCensus.zip") allow for other applications that require a representation of overall protection status without overlapping designation boundaries. The "PADUS3_0VectorAnalysis_State_Clip_CENSUS2020" feature class ("PADUS3_0VectorAnalysisFileOtherExtents_Clip_Census.gdb") is the source of the PAD-US 3.0 raster files (associated item of PAD-US 3.0 Spatial Analysis and Statistics, https://doi.org/10.5066/P9KLBB5D ). Note, the PAD-US inventory is now considered functionally complete with the vast majority of land protection types represented in some manner, while work continues to maintain updates and improve data quality (see inventory completeness estimates at: http://www.protectedlands.net/data-stewards/ ). In addition, changes in protected area status between versions of the PAD-US may be attributed to improving the completeness and accuracy of the spatial data more than actual management actions or new acquisitions. USGS provides no legal warranty for the use of this data. While PAD-US is the official aggregation of protected areas ( https://www.fgdc.gov/ngda-reports/NGDA_Datasets.html ), agencies are the best source of their lands data.

Data organization for the figures in the document: Figure 3A LineOutWithSun_SSAzi_135to225_green_Correct_ROI5_INFO.xls Figure 3b LineOutWithSun_SSAzi_m45to45_green_Correct_ROI5_INFO.xls Figure 4 fulllinear_inDic_SqAzi_m180to0_CP_20to50_green_Correct_ROI5_INFO.xls fulllinear_inDic_SqAzi_m180to0_CP_20to50_green_Sim_Correct_ROI5_INFO.xls Figure 5a LineOut_Camera_Elevation_SqAzi_m180to0_green_Sim_Correct_ROI5_INFO.xls LineOut_Camera_Elevation_SqAzi_m180to0_green_Correct_ROI5_INFO.xls Figure 5b LineOut_Camera_Elevation_SqAzi_0to180_green_Correct_ROI5_INFO.xls LineOut_Camera_Elevation_SqAzi_0to180_green_Sim_Correct_ROI5_INFO.xls Figure 6a LineOutColor_SqAzi_m180to0_CP_20to50_Correct_ROI5_INFO.xls Figure 6b LineOutROI_SqAzi_m180to0_CP_20to50_green_Correct_INFO.xls Figure 7 fulllinear_inDic_SqAzi_m180to0_CP_20to50_green_Correct_ROI5_INFO.xls LineOut_MeshAoPDif_Camera_Elevation_SqAzi_0to180_green_Correct_ROI5_INFO.xls LineOut_MeshAoPDif_Camera_Elevation_SqAzi_m180to0_green_Correct_ROI5_INFO.xls

Abstract

The documentation covers Enterprise Survey panel datasets that were collected in Slovenia in 2009, 2013 and 2019.

The Slovenia ES 2009 was conducted between 2008 and 2009. The Slovenia ES 2013 was conducted between March 2013 and September 2013. Finally, the Slovenia ES 2019 was conducted between December 2018 and November 2019. The objective of the Enterprise Survey is to gain an understanding of what firms experience in the private sector.

As part of its strategic goal of building a climate for investment, job creation, and sustainable growth, the World Bank has promoted improving the business environment as a key strategy for development, which has led to a systematic effort in collecting enterprise data across countries. The Enterprise Surveys (ES) are an ongoing World Bank project in collecting both objective data based on firms' experiences and enterprises' perception of the environment in which they operate.

Geographic coverage

National

Analysis unit

The primary sampling unit of the study is the establishment. An establishment is a physical location where business is carried out and where industrial operations take place or services are provided. A firm may be composed of one or more establishments. For example, a brewery may have several bottling plants and several establishments for distribution. For the purposes of this survey an establishment must take its own financial decisions and have its own financial statements separate from those of the firm. An establishment must also have its own management and control over its payroll.

Universe

As it is standard for the ES, the Slovenia ES was based on the following size stratification: small (5 to 19 employees), medium (20 to 99 employees), and large (100 or more employees).

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

The sample for Slovenia ES 2009, 2013, 2019 were selected using stratified random sampling, following the methodology explained in the Sampling Manual for Slovenia 2009 ES and for Slovenia 2013 ES, and in the Sampling Note for 2019 Slovenia ES.

Three levels of stratification were used in this country: industry, establishment size, and oblast (region). The original sample designs with specific information of the industries and regions chosen are included in the attached Excel file (Sampling Report.xls.) for Slovenia 2009 ES. For Slovenia 2013 and 2019 ES, specific information of the industries and regions chosen is described in the "The Slovenia 2013 Enterprise Surveys Data Set" and "The Slovenia 2019 Enterprise Surveys Data Set" reports respectively, Appendix E.

For the Slovenia 2009 ES, industry stratification was designed in the way that follows: the universe was stratified into manufacturing industries, services industries, and one residual (core) sector as defined in the sampling manual. Each industry had a target of 90 interviews. For the manufacturing industries sample sizes were inflated by about 17% to account for potential non-response cases when requesting sensitive financial data and also because of likely attrition in future surveys that would affect the construction of a panel. For the other industries (residuals) sample sizes were inflated by about 12% to account for under sampling in firms in service industries.

For Slovenia 2013 ES, industry stratification was designed in the way that follows: the universe was stratified into one manufacturing industry, and two service industries (retail, and other services).

Finally, for Slovenia 2019 ES, three levels of stratification were used in this country: industry, establishment size, and region. The original sample design with specific information of the industries and regions chosen is described in "The Slovenia 2019 Enterprise Surveys Data Set" report, Appendix C. Industry stratification was done as follows: Manufacturing – combining all the relevant activities (ISIC Rev. 4.0 codes 10-33), Retail (ISIC 47), and Other Services (ISIC 41-43, 45, 46, 49-53, 55, 56, 58, 61, 62, 79, 95).

For Slovenia 2009 and 2013 ES, size stratification was defined following the standardized definition for the rollout: small (5 to 19 employees), medium (20 to 99 employees), and large (more than 99 employees). For stratification purposes, the number of employees was defined on the basis of reported permanent full-time workers. This seems to be an appropriate definition of the labor force since seasonal/casual/part-time employment is not a common practice, except in the sectors of construction and agriculture.

For Slovenia 2009 ES, regional stratification was defined in 2 regions. These regions are Vzhodna Slovenija and Zahodna Slovenija. The Slovenia sample contains panel data. The wave 1 panel “Investment Climate Private Enterprise Survey implemented in Slovenia” consisted of 223 establishments interviewed in 2005. A total of 57 establishments have been re-interviewed in the 2008 Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey.

For Slovenia 2013 ES, regional stratification was defined in 2 regions (city and the surrounding business area) throughout Slovenia.

Finally, for Slovenia 2019 ES, regional stratification was done across two regions: Eastern Slovenia (NUTS code SI03) and Western Slovenia (SI04).

Mode of data collection

Computer Assisted Personal Interview [capi]

Research instrument

Questionnaires have common questions (core module) and respectfully additional manufacturing- and services-specific questions. The eligible manufacturing industries have been surveyed using the Manufacturing questionnaire (includes the core module, plus manufacturing specific questions). Retail firms have been interviewed using the Services questionnaire (includes the core module plus retail specific questions) and the residual eligible services have been covered using the Services questionnaire (includes the core module). Each variation of the questionnaire is identified by the index variable, a0.

Response rate

Survey non-response must be differentiated from item non-response. The former refers to refusals to participate in the survey altogether whereas the latter refers to the refusals to answer some specific questions. Enterprise Surveys suffer from both problems and different strategies were used to address these issues.

Item non-response was addressed by two strategies: a- For sensitive questions that may generate negative reactions from the respondent, such as corruption or tax evasion, enumerators were instructed to collect the refusal to respond as (-8). b- Establishments with incomplete information were re-contacted in order to complete this information, whenever necessary. However, there were clear cases of low response.

For 2009 and 2013 Slovenia ES, the survey non-response was addressed by maximizing efforts to contact establishments that were initially selected for interview. Up to 4 attempts were made to contact the establishment for interview at different times/days of the week before a replacement establishment (with similar strata characteristics) was suggested for interview. Survey non-response did occur but substitutions were made in order to potentially achieve strata-specific goals. Further research is needed on survey non-response in the Enterprise Surveys regarding potential introduction of bias.

For 2009, the number of contacted establishments per realized interview was 6.18. This number is the result of two factors: explicit refusals to participate in the survey, as reflected by the rate of rejection (which includes rejections of the screener and the main survey) and the quality of the sample frame, as represented by the presence of ineligible units. The relatively low ratio of contacted establishments per realized interview (6.18) suggests that the main source of error in estimates in the Slovenia may be selection bias and not frame inaccuracy.

For 2013, the number of realized interviews per contacted establishment was 25%. This number is the result of two factors: explicit refusals to participate in the survey, as reflected by the rate of rejection (which includes rejections of the screener and the main survey) and the quality of the sample frame, as represented by the presence of ineligible units. The number of rejections per contact was 44%.

Finally, for 2019, the number of interviews per contacted establishments was 9.7%. This number is the result of two factors: explicit refusals to participate in the survey, as reflected by the rate of rejection (which includes rejections of the screener and the main survey) and the quality of the sample frame, as represented by the presence of ineligible units. The share of rejections per contact was 75.2%.

This data includes the data of 30 provinces (municipalities) in China except Xizang, Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan in the ten years from 2011 to 2020 when the network interactive DEA model is used to evaluate the efficiency of sanitation management. They're stored in an excel spreadsheet called Data, Among them, the indicators include population density (people/square kilometers), urban area (square kilometers), harmless treatment capacity (tons/day), investment in city appearance and environmental sanitation (100 million yuan), employment (10,000 people), harmless treatment plants (seats), special vehicles and equipment for city appearance and environmental sanitation (vehicles), the number of public toilets (seats), harmless treatment capacity (10,000 tons), domestic waste clearance volume (10,000 tons), and roads Road cleaning area (10,000 square meters). It also contains the data of influencing factors in the spatial econometric analysis of efficiency, which are saved in the excel table named "Efficiency Influencing Factors", in which the indicators include the level of urban spatial aggregation, the level of urban economic development, the level of urban opening to the outside world, the urban environmental carrying capacity, the level of urban scientific and technological development, the urban industrial structure and the level of urban ecological construction. In addition, this data contains the efficiency values obtained from the analysis (excel table named "Efficiency") and the relevant network DEA code.

PROJECT OBJECTIVE

We are a part of XYZ Co Pvt Ltd company who is in the business of organizing the sports events at international level. Countries nominate sportsmen from different departments and our team has been given the responsibility to systematize the membership roster and generate different reports as per business requirements.

Questions (KPIs)

TASK 1: STANDARDIZING THE DATASET

• Populate the FULLNAME consisting of the following fields ONLY, in the prescribed format: PREFIX FIRSTNAME LASTNAME.{Note: All UPPERCASE)
• Get the COUNTRY NAME to which these sportsmen belong to. Make use of LOCATION sheet to get the required data
• Populate the LANGUAGE_!poken by the sportsmen. Make use of LOCTION sheet to get the required data
• Generate the EMAIL ADDRESS for those members, who speak English, in the prescribed format :lastname.firstnamel@xyz .org {Note: All lowercase) and for all other members, format should be lastname.firstname@xyz.com (Note: All lowercase)
• Populate the SPORT LOCATION of the sport played by each player. Make use of SPORT sheet to get the required data

TASK 2: DATA FORMATING

• Display MEMBER IDas always 3 digit number {Note: 001,002 ...,D2D,..etc)
• Format the BIRTHDATE as dd mmm'yyyy (Prescribed format example: 09 May' 1986)
• Display the units for the WEIGHT column (Prescribed format example: 80 kg)
• Format the SALARY to show the data In thousands. If SALARY is less than 100,000 then display data with 2 decimal places else display data with one decimal place. In both cases units should be thousands (k) e.g. 87670 -> 87.67 k and 12 250 -> 123.2 k

TASK 3: SUMMARIZE DATA - PIVOT TABLE (Use SPORTSMEN worksheet after attempting TASK 1) • Create a PIVOT table in the worksheet ANALYSIS, starting at cell B3,with the following details:

• In COLUMNS; Group : GENDER.
• In ROWS; Group : COUNTRY (Note: use COUNTRY NAMES).
• In VALUES; calculate the count of candidates from each COUNTRY and GENDER type, Remove GRAND TOTALs.

TASK 4: SUMMARIZE DATA - EXCEL FUNCTIONS (Use SPORTSMEN worksheet after attempting TASK 1)

• Create a SUMMARY table in the worksheet ANALYSIS,starting at cell G4, with the following details:

• Starting from range RANGE H4; get the distinct GENDER. Use remove duplicates option and transpose the data.
• Starting from range RANGE GS; get the distinct COUNTRY (Note: use COUNTRY NAMES).
• In the cross table,get the count of candidates from each COUNTRY and GENDER type.

TASK 5: GENERATE REPORT - PIVOT TABLE (Use SPORTSMEN worksheet after attempting TASK 1)

• Create a PIVOT table report in the worksheet REPORT, starting at cell A3, with the following information:

• Change the report layout to TABULAR form.
• Remove expand and collapse buttons.
• Remove GRAND TOTALs.
• Allow user to filter the data by SPORT LOCATION.

Process

• Verify data for any missing values and anomalies, and sort out the same.
• Made sure data is consistent and clean with respect to data type, data format and values used.
• Created pivot tables according to the questions asked.

Analyzing Coffee Shop Sales: Excel Insights 📈

In my first Data Analytics Project, I Discover the secrets of a fictional coffee shop's success with my data-driven analysis. By Analyzing a 5-sheet Excel dataset, I've uncovered valuable sales trends, customer preferences, and insights that can guide future business decisions. 📊☕

DATA CLEANING 🧹

• REMOVED DUPLICATES OR IRRELEVANT ENTRIES: Thoroughly eliminated duplicate records and irrelevant data to refine the dataset for analysis.

• FIXED STRUCTURAL ERRORS: Rectified any inconsistencies or structural issues within the data to ensure uniformity and accuracy.

• CHECKED FOR DATA CONSISTENCY: Verified the integrity and coherence of the dataset by identifying and resolving any inconsistencies or discrepancies.

DATA MANIPULATION 🛠️

• UTILIZED LOOKUPS: Used Excel's lookup functions for efficient data retrieval and analysis.

• IMPLEMENTED INDEX MATCH: Leveraged the Index Match function to perform advanced data searches and matches.

• APPLIED SUMIFS FUNCTIONS: Utilized SumIFs to calculate totals based on specified criteria.

• CALCULATED PROFITS: Used relevant formulas and techniques to determine profit margins and insights from the data.

PIVOTING THE DATA 𝄜

• CREATED PIVOT TABLES: Utilized Excel's PivotTable feature to pivot the data for in-depth analysis.

• FILTERED DATA: Utilized pivot tables to filter and analyze specific subsets of data, enabling focused insights. Specially used in “PEAK HOURS” and “TOP 3 PRODUCTS” charts.

VISUALIZATION 📊

• KEY INSIGHTS: Unveiled the grand total sales revenue while also analyzing the average bill per person, offering comprehensive insights into the coffee shop's performance and customer spending habits.

• SALES TREND ANALYSIS: Used Line chart to compute total sales across various time intervals, revealing valuable insights into evolving sales trends.

• PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS: Leveraged Clustered Column chart to identify peak sales hours, shedding light on optimal operating times and potential staffing needs.

• TOP 3 PRODUCTS IDENTIFICATION: Utilized Clustered Bar chart to determine the top three coffee types, facilitating strategic decisions regarding inventory management and marketing focus.

*I also used a Timeline to visualize chronological data trends and identify key patterns over specific times.

While it's a significant milestone for me, I recognize that there's always room for growth and improvement. Your feedback and insights are invaluable to me as I continue to refine my skills and tackle future projects. I'm eager to hear your thoughts and suggestions on how I can make my next endeavor even more impactful and insightful.

THANKS TO: WsCube Tech Mo Chen Alex Freberg

TOOLS USED: Microsoft Excel

DataAnalytics #DataAnalyst #ExcelProject #DataVisualization #BusinessIntelligence #SalesAnalysis #DataAnalysis #DataDrivenDecisions

This dataset contains the valuation template the researcher can use to retrieve real-time Excel stock price and stock price in Google Sheets. The dataset is provided by Finsheet, the leading financial data provider for spreadsheet users. To get more financial data, visit the website and explore their function. For instance, if a researcher would like to get the last 30 years of income statement for Meta Platform Inc, the syntax would be =FS_EquityFullFinancials("FB", "ic", "FY", 30) In addition, this syntax will return the latest stock price for Caterpillar Inc right in your spreadsheet. =FS_Latest("CAT") If you need assistance with any of the function, feel free to reach out to their customer support team. To get starter, install their Excel and Google Sheets add-on.

Spreadsheet Software Market Size And Forecast

Spreadsheet Software Market size was valued at USD 10.05 Billion in 2023 and is expected to reach USD 14.55 Billion by 2031, with a CAGR of 7.8% from 2024-2031.

Global Spreadsheet Software Market Drivers

The market drivers for the Spreadsheet Software Market can be influenced by various factors. These may include:

Increasing Data Volume: As organizations generate and collect more data, the need for efficient data analysis and management tools, such as spreadsheet software, grows. Rising Demand for Data Visualization: Users increasingly seek sophisticated tools to visualize data for better insights. Spreadsheet software can provide charts and graphs, making data interpretation easier.

Global Spreadsheet Software Market Restraints

Several factors can act as restraints or challenges for the Spreadsheet Software Market, These may include:

Market Saturation: Many organizations already use established spreadsheet software such as Microsoft Excel or Google Sheets. The reliance on these platforms can make it difficult for new entrants or alternative solutions to capture market share. High Competition: The market is highly competitive, with numerous players offering similar features and functionalities. This can lead to price wars and reduced profit margins for software providers.

Associated with all model outputs and options

GSA, the nation's largest public real estate organization, provides workspace for over one million federal workers. These employees, along with government property, are housed in space owned by the federal government and in leased properties including buildings, land, antenna sites, etc. across the country.

Context

In small and medium sized firms that aim to do CRM, employees sometimes use Excel to track Customer Feedback. Excel is widely used due to its popularity and clean interface. However, Excel is not similar to other advanced CRM software and websites such as Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, or Zoho. In cases where an organization aims to collect lower level feedback that can the be uploaded to a larger CRM software, Excel is a good choice. I did some research on how to make it easier for a CRM officer, salesperson, or company data managers to automate client feedback tracking using Excel's VBA functionality and VLOOKUP.

Content

This dataset has one file- CRM Finance Loan Tracking Excel File.xlsm which has columns related to customers of a medium-sized financial institution such as Client, Bank Branch Name, Phone Number, Client Account No., Loan Account No., Product, Loan Amount, Disbursed Date, Maturity, Repaid, Debt Owing, Current Note, 1st Latest Note, 2nd Latest Note, 3rd Latest Note, 4th Latest Note, and 5th Latest Note.

How to Use the Excel File

First, enable macros in the Excel file. Then, you can proceed as follows: On the first sheet called CLIENT LOANS, try typing in column M (Current Note) for any client. The VBA code will automatically update the 1st to 5th Latest Notes in columns N to R. You can look the note logs in the second sheet called LogSheet. The third sheet called CountSpecific shows the count of specific notes for each client.

Note that you can tweak the functionality of these XLSM files to suit your needs, by removing some unneeded columns and adding new ones. Just remember to modify the VBA code accordingly. .

Acknowledgements

This dataset is a compilation of random client names obtained from https://1000randomnames.com/. Other columns also contain random facts of the clients. For illustrative purposes, I typed the notes for the first five clients.

Inspiration

Can we have a simple excel file that helps in tracks client feedback? Can we use Excel formulas to track recurring customer complaints? Can we make it easier to see previous client feedback?

Use Cases - Portfolio management - Sales pipeline management - Client feedback tracking - Student progress tracking - Organizational records tracking - Budget management

The HR analytics tools market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing need for data-driven decision-making in human resource management. The market, estimated at $15 billion in 2025, is projected to achieve a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 12% from 2025 to 2033, reaching approximately $45 billion by 2033. This expansion is fueled by several key factors. Firstly, organizations are increasingly leveraging data to optimize recruitment processes, improve employee engagement, and enhance workforce planning. Secondly, advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are enabling more sophisticated analytics capabilities, providing actionable insights into employee behavior, performance, and attrition. Thirdly, the rising adoption of cloud-based HR solutions is facilitating easier access to data and enhanced collaboration across HR teams. The market is segmented by various tools, including Python, RStudio, Tableau, KNIME, Power BI, Microsoft Excel, Orange, and Apache Hadoop, each catering to different analytical needs and organizational scale. Despite the significant growth potential, the market faces certain challenges. Data privacy and security concerns remain a major hurdle, especially given the sensitive nature of employee data. The lack of skilled professionals proficient in data analytics and HR practices also presents a limitation. Furthermore, the integration of disparate HR data sources can be complex and time-consuming. However, these challenges are being addressed through the development of robust data security protocols, specialized training programs, and integrated HR software solutions. The North American region currently holds the largest market share, but Asia-Pacific is anticipated to show the fastest growth in the coming years due to the increasing adoption of HR analytics tools in rapidly growing economies.

A version of the Materials Data Vocabulary structured as Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS). The XML was originally created by the TemaTres software. This vocabulary describes the applicability to material science of records in the NIST Materials Resource Registry (NMRR - https://materials.registry.nist.gov/). The NMRR allows for the registration of materials resources, bridging the gap between existing resources and the end users. The NMRR functions as a node in a federated system, making the registered information available for research to the materials community. This is being developed at the National Institute of Standards and Technology and is made available to solicit comments from the Material Science community. (An Excel version of the file is also included in the distributions for ease of use.)

This dataset resulted from conducting focus groups with scientists from five disciplines (atmospheric and earth science, chemistry, computer science, ecology, and neuroscience) about data management to lead into a discussion of what features they think are necessary to include in data repository systems and services to help them implement the data sharing and preservation parts of their data management plans. Participants identified metadata quality control and training as problem areas in data management. Participants discussed several desired repository features, including: metadata control, data traceability, security, stable infrastructure, and data use restrictions. Our dataset includes five anonymized focus group transcripts in .pdf file format (one for each focus group with scientists from each discipline), our codebook as a spreadsheet in excel file format (.xlsx), and coded segments of our transcript text to visualize our data analysis in an excel spreadsheet in excel file format (.xlsx).

ISO is an independent advisory organization that collects information on a community's building-code adoption and enforcement services in order to provide a ranking for insurance companies. ISO assigns a Building Code Effectiveness Classification from 1 to 10 based on the data collected. Class 1 represents exemplary commitment to building-code enforcement.Municipalities with better rankings are lower risk, and their residents' insurance rates can reflect that. The prospect of minimizing catastrophe-related damage and ultimately lowering insurance costs gives communities an incentive to enforce their building codes rigorously.This page provides data for the Insurance Services Organization (ISO) performance measure. This data includes residential and commercial building code enforcement ratings for the City of Tempe.The performance measure dashboard is available at 1.15 Insurance Services Organization (ISO) RatingAdditional InformationSource: Insurance Service Organization RatingContact: Chris ThompsonContact E-Mail: Christopher_Thompson@tempe.govData Source Type: ExcelPreparation Method: Information added to Excel spreadsheet from rating reportPublish Frequency: Every 5 YearsPublish Method: ManualData Dictionary

This dataset (Exploring Workforce Dataset A) contains quantitative data from the fall 2023 Exploring the Data Workforce project survey. Exploring Workforce Dataset A v.2 was updated and added on June 19, 2025 and is the most recent version to date. There is an explanatory README tab at the front of the Excel workbook. Data in the Excel Workbook has been cleaned and tabs are sorted in the order of the survey questions, followed by data analysis (mean and standard deviation) for each question.The Qualtrics values text file (Word document) contains the Qualtrics survey and the numerical response values that correspond with the Likert scales in the Excel spreadsheet tabs. You can use these values to read the participant responses.

The Los Angeles County departments and organization uses the Esri HUB site(s) as a platform to provide access to information related to various components of their open data. Hosted documentation, upload a file which supported by the following potential file types: Microsoft Excel (.xls, .xlsx), Microsoft PowerPoint (.ppt, .pptx), Microsoft Word (.doc, .docx), PDF (.pdf), and Microsoft Visio Document (.vsd) or others. This site, Countywide Address Management System (CAMS) HUB Site and associated pages are used to share information about specific topics, projects, and plans related to the Countywide Address Management System (CAMS). The content, items, groups, etc. are all critical to ensure the access to Open Data the contained information should serve as a bridge between the Los Angeles County enterprise GIS organization and the community it serves (ie EVERYONE). potential information available added for context.

The global spreadsheet editor market is booming, projected to reach $130 billion by 2033 with a 10% CAGR. Discover key market trends, leading players (Microsoft, Google, LibreOffice), and regional growth insights in our comprehensive analysis. Explore the impact of cloud solutions, free vs. paid models, and future market potential.

Users can find data on a range of global health topics like mortality, the burden of disease, infectious diseases, risk factors and health expenditures. Background The Global Health Observatory (GHO) database is the World Health Organization's main health statistics repository. Data is available for 193 World Health Organization member states on topics including but not limited to: Health related millennium goals, mortality, immunization, nutrition, infectious disease, non- communicable disease, tobacco control, violence, injuries, alcohol, HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria, water and sanitation, maternal and reproductive health, cho lera, child health, child nutrition, and road safety. User FunctionalityUsers can generate tables and charts according to country or region, health indicator, and time period. Data can also be compared across countries. Data can be filtered, tabulated, charted, and downloaded into Excel statistical software. These data are also published in statistical reports covering topics including: Alcohol and health, Child health, Cholera, HIV/AIDS, Malaria, Maternal and reproductive heal th, Non-communicable diseases, Public health and environment, Road safety, Tuberculosis, Tobacco control. Data Notes Data are derived from surveillance and household surveys. Years in which data were collected is indicated with these health statistics. Information is available for each WHO member country and international region. The most recent data is available from 2009.