This excel contains results from the 2020 indicator update of the 2017 State of Narragansett Bay and Its Watershed Technical Report (nbep.org), Chapter 5: "Land Use." Land use in 2001, 2004, 2006, 2008, 2011, 2013, and 2016 in the Narragansett Bay, Little Narragansett Bay, and the Southwest Coastal Ponds watersheds was analyzed using the 30-meter 2016 edition National Land Cover Database (NLCD). Seven overarching land use categories were reclassified from the NLCD based on the Anderson Level I classification scheme (Forest - 41, 42, 43; Developed - 21, 22, 23, 24; Agricultural Land - 71, 72, 81, 82; Shrubland - 52; Wetland - 90, 95; Barren Land - 31; Water - 11). The gross change (in acres) and percent change of forested land uses are summarized at a variety of watershed scales across all NLCD years in the Narragansett Bay region. The methods for analyzing land use as an indicator of environmental conditions in the Narragansett Bay region were developed by the US Environmental Protection Agency ORD Atlantic Coastal Environmental Sciences Division in collaboration with the Narragansett Bay Estuary Program and other partners.

The Climate Change Vulnerability Index (CCVI) uses a scoring system that integrates a species’ exposure to projected climate change within an assessment area, including sea level rise, and three sets of factors associated with climate change sensitivity, each supported by published studies: 1) species-specific sensitivity and adaptive capacity factors, 2) threat multipliers such as barriers to dispersal and anthropogenic threats, and 3) documented and modeled responses to climate change. Assessing species with the CCVI facilitates grouping unrelated taxa by their relative risk to climate change as well as identifying patterns of climate stressors that affect multiple taxa.

This excel contains data for Chapter 4 “Land Use” of the 2017 State of Narragansett Bay & Its Watershed Technical Report (nbep.org). It includes the raw data behind Figure 4, “Historical changes in percentage of Narragansett Bay Watershed classified as forest or urban,” (page 121). For more information, please reference the Technical Report or contact info@nbep.org. Original figures are available at http://nbep.org/the-state-of-our-watershed/figures/.

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the Excel township population over the last 20 plus years. It lists the population for each year, along with the year on year change in population, as well as the change in percentage terms for each year. The dataset can be utilized to understand the population change of Excel township across the last two decades. For example, using this dataset, we can identify if the population is declining or increasing. If there is a change, when the population peaked, or if it is still growing and has not reached its peak. We can also compare the trend with the overall trend of United States population over the same period of time.

Key observations

In 2023, the population of Excel township was 300, a 0.99% decrease year-by-year from 2022. Previously, in 2022, Excel township population was 303, a decline of 0.98% compared to a population of 306 in 2021. Over the last 20 plus years, between 2000 and 2023, population of Excel township increased by 17. In this period, the peak population was 308 in the year 2020. The numbers suggest that the population has already reached its peak and is showing a trend of decline. Source: U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP).

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP).

Data Coverage:

• From 2000 to 2023

Variables / Data Columns

• Year: This column displays the data year (Measured annually and for years 2000 to 2023)
• Population: The population for the specific year for the Excel township is shown in this column.
• Year on Year Change: This column displays the change in Excel township population for each year compared to the previous year.
• Change in Percent: This column displays the year on year change as a percentage. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Excel township Population by Year. You can refer the same here

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the Excel population over the last 20 plus years. It lists the population for each year, along with the year on year change in population, as well as the change in percentage terms for each year. The dataset can be utilized to understand the population change of Excel across the last two decades. For example, using this dataset, we can identify if the population is declining or increasing. If there is a change, when the population peaked, or if it is still growing and has not reached its peak. We can also compare the trend with the overall trend of United States population over the same period of time.

Key observations

In 2022, the population of Excel was 539, a 1.46% decrease year-by-year from 2021. Previously, in 2021, Excel population was 547, a decline of 1.08% compared to a population of 553 in 2020. Over the last 20 plus years, between 2000 and 2022, population of Excel decreased by 36. In this period, the peak population was 713 in the year 2010. The numbers suggest that the population has already reached its peak and is showing a trend of decline. Source: U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP).

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP).

Data Coverage:

• From 2000 to 2022

Variables / Data Columns

• Year: This column displays the data year (Measured annually and for years 2000 to 2022)
• Population: The population for the specific year for the Excel is shown in this column.
• Year on Year Change: This column displays the change in Excel population for each year compared to the previous year.
• Change in Percent: This column displays the year on year change as a percentage. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Excel Population by Year. You can refer the same here

The Florida Flood Hub for Applied Research and Innovation and the U.S. Geological Survey have developed projected future change factors for precipitation depth-duration-frequency (DDF) curves at 242 NOAA Atlas 14 stations in Florida. The change factors were computed as the ratio of projected future to historical extreme-precipitation depths fitted to extreme-precipitation data from downscaled climate datasets using a constrained maximum likelihood (CML) approach as described in https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20225093. The change factors correspond to the period 2068-72 (centered in the year 2070) as compared to the 1966-2005 historical period. A Microsoft Excel workbook is provided which tabulates change factors derived from the Analog Resampling and Statistical Scaling Method by Jupiter Intelligence using the Weather Research and Forecasting Model (JupiterWRF) at grid cells closest to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Atlas 14 stations in Florida. The change factors were computed as the ratio of projected future to historical precipitation depths fitted to extreme-precipitation data. The change factors are tabulated by duration (1 day) and return period (5, 10, 25, 50, 100, 200, and 500 years).

This is the raw particulate matter data. Each sheet (tab) is formatted to be exported as a .csv for use with the R-code (AQ-June20.R). In order for this code to work properly, it is important that this file remain intact. Do not change the column names or codes for data, for example. And to be safe, don’t even sort. One simple change in the excel file could make the code full of bugs.

Excel sheet with data of the original research 'Evaluation of simple and cost-effective hematological inflammatory biomarkers in type 2 diabetes and their correlation with glycemic control'

This is the gravimetric data used to calibrate the real time readings. Each sheet (tab) is formatted to be exported as a .csv for use with the R-code (AQ-June20.R). In order for this code to work properly, it is important that this file remain intact. Do not change the column names or codes for data, for example. And to be safe, don’t even sort. One simple change in the excel file could make the code full of bugs.

The Florida Flood Hub for Applied Research and Innovation and the U.S. Geological Survey have developed projected future change factors for precipitation depth-duration-frequency (DDF) curves at 242 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Atlas 14 stations in Florida. The change factors were computed as the ratio of projected future to historical extreme-precipitation depths fitted to extreme-precipitation data from downscaled climate datasets using a constrained maximum likelihood (CML) approach as described in https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20225093. The change factors correspond to the period 2020-59 (centered in 2040) or to the period 2050-89 (centered in the year 2070) as compared to the 1966-2005 historical period. A Microsoft Excel workbook is provided that tabulates best models for each downscaled climate dataset and for all downscaled climate datasets considered together. Best models were identified based on how well the models capture the climatology and interannual variability of four climate extreme indices using the Model Climatology Index (MCI) and the Model Variability Index (MVI) of Srivastava and others (2020). The four indices consist of annual maxima consecutive precipitation for durations of 1, 3, 5, and 7 days compared against the same indices computed based on the PRISM and SFWMD gridded precipitation datasets for five climate regions: climate region 1 in Northwest Florida, 2 in North Florida, 3 in North Central Florida, 4 in South Central Florida, and climate region 5 in South Florida. The PRISM dataset is based on the Parameter-elevation Relationships on Independent Slopes Model interpolation method of Daly and others (2008). The South Florida Water Management District’s (SFWMD) precipitation super-grid is a gridded precipitation dataset developed by modelers at the agency for use in hydrologic modeling (SFWMD, 2005). This dataset is considered by the SFWMD as the best available gridded rainfall dataset for south Florida and was used in addition to PRISM to identify best models in the South Central and South Florida climate regions. Best models were selected based on MCI and MVI evaluated within each individual downscaled dataset. In addition, best models were selected by comparison across datasets and referred to as "ALL DATASETS" hereafter. Due to the small sample size, all models in the using the Weather Research and Forecasting Model (JupiterWRF) dataset were considered as best models.

sample and result data for the paper of Forecasting residuals optimization with structural change under the effect of a specific event

This is the raw H2S data- concentration of H2S in parts per million in the biogas. Each sheet (tab) is formatted to be exported as a .csv for use with the R-code (AQ-June20.R). In order for this code to work properly, it is important that this file remain intact. Do not change the column names or codes for data, for example. And to be safe, don’t even sort. One simple change in the excel file could make the code full of bugs.

Dataset

This dataset was created by Bhupen Kumar Acharya

Contents

The South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and the U.S. Geological Survey have developed projected future change factors for precipitation depth-duration-frequency (DDF) curves at 174 NOAA Atlas 14 stations in central and south Florida. The change factors were computed as the ratio of projected future to historical extreme precipitation depths fitted to extreme precipitation data from various downscaled climate datasets using a constrained maximum likelihood (CML) approach. The change factors correspond to the period 2050-2089 (centered in the year 2070) as compared to the 1966-2005 historical period. A Microsoft Excel workbook is provided which tabulates change factors derived from the Coordinated Regional Downscaling Experiment (CORDEX) dataset at model grid cells closest to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Atlas 14 stations in central and south Florida. The change factors were computed as the ratio of projected future to historical extreme ...

The Florida Flood Hub for Applied Research and Innovation and the U.S. Geological Survey have developed projected future change factors for precipitation depth-duration-frequency (DDF) curves at 242 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Atlas 14 stations in Florida. The change factors were computed as the ratio of projected future to historical extreme-precipitation depths fitted to extreme-precipitation data from downscaled climate datasets using a constrained maximum likelihood (CML) approach as described in https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20225093. The change factors correspond to the periods 2020-59 (centered in the year 2040) and 2050-89 (centered in the year 2070) as compared to the 1966-2005 historical period.
An R script (create_boxplot.R) is provided which generates boxplots of change factors by NOAA Atlas 14 station, or for all NOAA Atlas 14 stations in a Florida HUC-8 basin or county. In addition, the R script basin_boxplot.R is provided as an example on how to create a wrapper function that will automate the generation of boxplots of change factors for all Florida HUC-8 basins. This Microsoft Word file (Documentation_R_script_create_boxplot.docx) serves as documentation on the code usage and available options for running the scripts. As described in the documentation, the R scripts rely on some of the Microsoft Excel spreadsheets published as part of this data release. The script uses basins defined in the "Florida Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) Basins (areas)" from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP; https://geodata.dep.state.fl.us/datasets/FDEP::florida-hydrologic-unit-code-huc-basins-areas/explore) and their names are listed in the file basins_list.txt provided with the script. County names are listed in the file counties_list.txt provided with the script. NOAA Atlas 14 stations located in each Florida HUC-8 basin or county are defined in the Microsoft Excel spreadsheet Datasets_station_information.xlsx which is part of this data release. Instructions are provided in code documentation (see highlighted text on page 7 of Documentation_R_script_create_boxplot.docx) so that users can modify the script to generate boxplots for basins different from the FDEP "Florida Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) Basins (areas)."

My Grandpa asked if the programs I was using could calculate his Golf League’s handicaps, so I decided to play around with SQL and Google Sheets to see if I could functionally recreate what they were doing.

The goal is to calculate a player’s handicap, which is the average of the last six months of their scores minus 29. The average is calculated based on how many games they have actually played in the last six months, and the number of scores averaged correlates to total games. For example, Clem played over 20 games so his handicap will be calculated with the maximum possible scores accounted for, that being 8. Schomo only played six games, so the lowest 4 will be used for their average. Handicap is always calculated with the lowest available scores.

This league uses Excel, so upon receiving the data I converted it into a CSV and uploaded it into bigQuery.

First thing I did was change column names to best represent what they were and simplify things in the code. It is much easier to remember ‘someone_scores’ than ‘int64_field_number’. It also seemed to confuse SQL less, as int64 can mean something independently. (ALTER TABLE grandpa-golf.grandpas_golf_35.should only need the one RENAME COLUMN int64_field_4 TO schomo_scores;)

To Find the average of Clem’s scores: SELECT AVG(clem_scores) FROM grandpa-golf.grandpas_golf_35.should only need the one LIMIT 8; RESULT: 43.1

Remembering that handicap is the average minus 29, the final computation looks like: SELECT AVG(clem_scores) - 29 FROM grandpa-golf.grandpas_golf_35.should only need the one LIMIT 8; RESULT: 14.1

Find the average of Schomo’s scores: SELECT AVG(schomo_scores) - 29 FROM grandpa-golf.grandpas_golf_35.should only need the one LIMIT 6; RESULT: 10.5

This data was already automated to calculate a handicap in the league’s excel spreadsheet, so I asked for more data to see if i could recreate those functions.

Grandpa provided the past three years of league data. The names were all replaced with generic “Golfer 001, Golfer 002, etc”. I had planned on converting this Excel sheet into a CSV and manipulating it in SQL like with the smaller sample, but this did not work.

Immediately, there were problems. I had initially tried to just convert the file into a CSV and drop it into SQL, but there were functions that did not transfer properly from what was functionally the PDF I had been emailed. So instead of working with SQL, I decided to pull this into google sheets and recreate the functions for this spreadsheet. We only need the most recent 6 months of scores to calculate our handicap, so once I made a working copy I deleted the data from before this time period. Once that was cleaned up, I started working on a function that would pull the working average from these values, which is still determined by how many total values there were. This correlates as follows: for 20 or more scores average the lowest 8, for 15 to 19 scores average the lowest 6, for 6 to 14 scores average the lowest 4 and for 6 or fewer scores average the lowest 2. We also need to ensure that an average value of 0 returns a value of 0 so our handicap calculator works. My formula ended up being:

=IF(COUNT(E2:AT2)>=20, AVERAGE(SMALL(E2:AT2, ROW(INDIRECT("1:"&8)))), IF(COUNT(E2:AT2)>=15, AVERAGE(SMALL(E2:AT2, ROW(INDIRECT("1:"&6)))), IF(COUNT(E2:AT2)>=6, AVERAGE(SMALL(E2:AT2, ROW(INDIRECT("1:"&4)))), IF(COUNT(E2:AT2)>=1, AVERAGE(SMALL(E2:AT2, ROW(INDIRECT("1:"&2)))), IF(COUNT(E2:AT2)=0, 0, "")))))

The handicap is just this value minus 29, so for the handicap column the script is relatively simple: =IF(D2=0,0,IF(D2>47,18,D2-29)) This ensures that we will not get a negative value for our handicap, and pulls the basic average from the right place. It also sets the handicap to zero if there are no scores present.

Now that we have our spreadsheet back in working order with our new scripts, we are functionally done. We have recreated what my Grandpa’s league uses to generate handicaps.

Change-In-Other-Working-Capital Time Series for Excel Force MSC Bhd. Excel Force MSC Berhad, together with its subsidiaries, develops, provides, and maintains software application solutions for the financial services industry in Malaysia. The company operates through Application Solutions, Maintenance Services, Application Services Provider, and Other segments. Its product portfolio includes CyberStock BTX, a bridging trader and exchange system platform that provides trading tools classes; and CyberStock ECOS, a stock broking solution which offers real time market information, place trades, and manage orders solution. In addition, the company provides CyberStock Mobile Trader, a mobile trading system that connects users smartphones to exchanges to manage trading activities; and CyberStock EDS, an exempt dealer system that provides advanced trading infrastructure and facilities for commercial banks. Further, it offers CyberStock SMF, a share margin financing system that enables financial institutions, brokerage firms, and banks to operate and manage margin financing services; and CyberStock CNS, a custodian and nominee system, which provides value-added services, such as trade settlement, cash balances investment, income collection, corporate actions processing, recordkeeping and reporting to custodian banks for domestic services. Additionally, the company provides CyberStock BOS, a back office system to manage enormous file and data; and offers network and security services. Excel Force MSC Berhad was founded in 1994 and is based in Petaling Jaya, Malaysia.

Excel spreadsheets of Seasonal Antarctic Sea Ice Extent Reconstructions

About this dataset

Context

The dataset illustrates the median household income in Excel, spanning the years from 2010 to 2021, with all figures adjusted to 2022 inflation-adjusted dollars. Based on the latest 2017-2021 5-Year Estimates from the American Community Survey, it displays how income varied over the last decade. The dataset can be utilized to gain insights into median household income trends and explore income variations.

Key observations:

From 2010 to 2021, the median household income for Excel increased by $13,784 (25.63%), as per the American Community Survey estimates. In comparison, median household income for the United States increased by $4,559 (6.51%) between 2010 and 2021.

Analyzing the trend in median household income between the years 2010 and 2021, spanning 11 annual cycles, we observed that median household income, when adjusted for 2022 inflation using the Consumer Price Index retroactive series (R-CPI-U-RS), experienced growth year by year for 7 years and declined for 4 years.

https://i.neilsberg.com/ch/excel-al-median-household-income-trend.jpeg" alt="Excel, AL median household income trend (2010-2021, in 2022 inflation-adjusted dollars)">

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2017-2021 5-Year Estimates. All incomes have been adjusting for inflation and are presented in 2022-inflation-adjusted dollars.

Years for which data is available:

• 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021

Variables / Data Columns

• Year: This column presents the data year from 2010 to 2021
• Median Household Income: Median household income, in 2022 inflation-adjusted dollars for the specific year
• YOY Change($): Change in median household income between the current and the previous year, in 2022 inflation-adjusted dollars
• YOY Change(%): Percent change in median household income between current and the previous year

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Excel median household income. You can refer the same here