Facebook
Twitterhttps://urbantide.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/ESC+software+license.pdfhttps://urbantide.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/ESC+software+license.pdf
This dataset contains both a PDF report of the LEAR in question, and an Excel spreadsheet of data that sits behind the graphs and maps in the report. The report can be found under Additional Documention section below, and the spreadsheet of backing under Raw Files.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policy
According to our latest research, the global service topology graph database market size reached USD 1.42 billion in 2024, demonstrating robust momentum with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 21.8%. The market is expected to achieve a value of USD 10.62 billion by 2033. This impressive growth is primarily driven by the increasing demand for advanced data management solutions, the proliferation of complex IT infrastructures, and the rising necessity for real-time analytics and visualization across diverse industries. The market’s rapid expansion is further bolstered by technological advancements in graph database architectures and the growing adoption of cloud-based deployment models.
One of the most significant growth factors in the service topology graph database market is the escalating complexity of modern IT environments. As organizations transition toward hybrid and multi-cloud infrastructures, the need for solutions that can accurately map and manage intricate service relationships has become paramount. Graph databases excel at representing highly interconnected data, making them ideal for modeling service topologies. This capability enables enterprises to visualize dependencies, identify bottlenecks, and optimize resource allocation, thereby enhancing operational efficiency and minimizing downtime. Additionally, the growing integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning with graph databases allows for predictive analytics and automated anomaly detection, further fueling market growth.
Another key driver is the surge in demand for enhanced network management and security. With the increasing frequency and sophistication of cyber threats, organizations are seeking comprehensive solutions to monitor and secure their networks. Service topology graph databases provide unparalleled visibility into network structures, enabling proactive identification of vulnerabilities and facilitating rapid incident response. These databases support real-time monitoring and compliance tracking, which are critical for industries with stringent regulatory requirements such as BFSI and healthcare. The ability to correlate data from multiple sources and uncover hidden patterns is proving invaluable for security teams, making graph databases an essential component of modern cybersecurity strategies.
The expanding adoption of digital transformation initiatives across various sectors also contributes to the market’s growth. Enterprises are leveraging service topology graph databases to streamline asset management, optimize IT operations, and improve customer experiences. In the retail sector, for example, these databases help map customer journeys and personalize interactions by analyzing relationships between products, users, and transactions. In manufacturing, they facilitate predictive maintenance and supply chain optimization by modeling equipment dependencies and process flows. As organizations continue to prioritize data-driven decision-making, the demand for graph-based solutions is expected to rise significantly, further propelling the market forward.
From a regional perspective, North America currently leads the global market, accounting for the largest revenue share in 2024. This dominance is attributed to the presence of major technology vendors, early adoption of advanced IT solutions, and significant investments in research and development. Europe follows closely, driven by stringent data privacy regulations and the need for efficient compliance management. The Asia Pacific region is witnessing the fastest growth, fueled by rapid digitalization, expanding IT infrastructure, and increasing investments in cloud computing. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are also experiencing steady growth, supported by government initiatives to modernize public services and enhance cybersecurity capabilities.
The component segment of the service topology graph database market is bifurcated into software and services, each playing a pivotal role in driving overall market expansion. The software sub-segment dominates the market, owing to the continuous evolution of graph database platforms that offer enhanced scalability, flexibility, and integration capabilities. Modern graph database software solutions are equipped with advanced visualization tools, intuitive user interfaces, and robust APIs, enabling seamless in
Facebook
Twitter
According to our latest research, the global graph data integration platform market size reached USD 2.1 billion in 2024, reflecting robust adoption across industries. The market is projected to grow at a CAGR of 18.4% from 2025 to 2033, reaching approximately USD 10.7 billion by 2033. This significant growth is fueled by the increasing need for advanced data management and analytics solutions that can handle complex, interconnected data across diverse organizational ecosystems. The rapid digital transformation and the proliferation of big data have further accelerated the demand for graph-based data integration platforms.
The primary growth factor driving the graph data integration platform market is the exponential increase in data complexity and volume within enterprises. As organizations collect vast amounts of structured and unstructured data from multiple sources, traditional relational databases often struggle to efficiently process and analyze these data sets. Graph data integration platforms, with their ability to map, connect, and analyze relationships between data points, offer a more intuitive and scalable solution. This capability is particularly valuable in sectors such as BFSI, healthcare, and telecommunications, where real-time data insights and dynamic relationship mapping are crucial for decision-making and operational efficiency.
Another significant driver is the growing emphasis on advanced analytics and artificial intelligence. Modern enterprises are increasingly leveraging AI and machine learning to extract actionable insights from their data. Graph data integration platforms enable the creation of knowledge graphs and support complex analytics, such as fraud detection, recommendation engines, and risk assessment. These platforms facilitate seamless integration of disparate data sources, enabling organizations to gain a holistic view of their operations and customers. As a result, investment in graph data integration solutions is rising, particularly among large enterprises seeking to enhance their analytics capabilities and maintain a competitive edge.
The surge in regulatory requirements and compliance mandates across various industries also contributes to the expansion of the graph data integration platform market. Organizations are under increasing pressure to ensure data accuracy, lineage, and transparency, especially in highly regulated sectors like finance and healthcare. Graph-based platforms excel in tracking data provenance and relationships, making it easier for companies to comply with regulations such as GDPR, HIPAA, and others. Additionally, the shift towards hybrid and multi-cloud environments further underscores the need for robust data integration tools capable of operating seamlessly across different infrastructures, further boosting market growth.
From a regional perspective, North America currently dominates the graph data integration platform market, accounting for the largest share due to early adoption of advanced data technologies, a strong presence of key market players, and significant investments in digital transformation initiatives. However, Asia Pacific is expected to witness the fastest growth over the forecast period, driven by rapid industrialization, expanding IT infrastructure, and increasing adoption of cloud-based solutions among enterprises in countries like China, India, and Japan. Europe also remains a significant contributor, supported by stringent data privacy regulations and a mature digital economy.
The component segment of the graph data integration platform market is bifurcated into software and services. The software segment currently commands the largest market share, reflecting the critical role of robust graph database engines, visualization tools, and integration frameworks in managing and analyzing complex data relationships. These software solutions are designed to deliver high scalability, flexibility, and real-time proces
Facebook
Twitterhttps://urbantide.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/ESC+software+license.pdfhttps://urbantide.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/ESC+software+license.pdf
This dataset contains both a PDF report of the LEAR in question, and an Excel spreadsheet of data that sits behind the graphs and maps in the report. The report can be found under Additional Documention section below, and the spreadsheet of backing under Raw Files.
Facebook
TwitterThis is a collection of all GPS- and computer-generated geospatial data specific to the Alpine Treeline Warming Experiment (ATWE), located on Niwot Ridge, Colorado, USA. The experiment ran between 2008 and 2016, and consisted of three sites spread across an elevation gradient. Geospatial data for all three experimental sites and cone/seed collection locations are included in this package. ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Geospatial files include cone collection, experimental site, seed trap, and other GPS location/terrain data. File types include ESRI shapefiles, ESRI grid files or Arc/Info binary grids, TIFFs (.tif), and keyhole markup language (.kml) files. Trimble-imported data include plain text files (.txt), Trimble COR (CorelDRAW) files, and Trimble SSF (Standard Storage Format) files. Microsoft Excel (.xlsx) and comma-separated values (.csv) files corresponding to the attribute tables of many files within this package are also included. A complete list of files can be found in this document in the “Data File Organization” section in the included Data User's Guide. Maps are also included in this data package for reference and use. These maps are separated into two categories, 2021 maps and legacy maps, which were made in 2010. Each 2021 map has one copy in portable network graphics (.png) format, and the other in .pdf format. All legacy maps are in .pdf format. .png image files can be opened with any compatible programs, such as Preview (Mac OS) and Photos (Windows). All GIS files were imported into geopackages (.gpkg) using QGIS, and double-checked for compatibility and data/attribute integrity using ESRI ArcGIS Pro. Note that files packaged within geopackages will open in ArcGIS Pro with “main.” preceding each file name, and an extra column named “geom” defining geometry type in the attribute table. The contents of each geospatial file remain intact, unless otherwise stated in “niwot_geospatial_data_list_07012021.pdf/.xlsx”. This list of files can be found as an .xlsx and a .pdf in this archive. As an open-source file format, files within gpkgs (TIFF, shapefiles, ESRI grid or “Arc/Info Binary”) can be read using both QGIS and ArcGIS Pro, and any other geospatial softwares. Text and .csv files can be read using TextEdit/Notepad/any simple text-editing software; .csv’s can also be opened using Microsoft Excel and R. .kml files can be opened using Google Maps or Google Earth, and Trimble files are most compatible with Trimble’s GPS Pathfinder Office software. .xlsx files can be opened using Microsoft Excel. PDFs can be opened using Adobe Acrobat Reader, and any other compatible programs. A selection of original shapefiles within this archive were generated using ArcMap with associated FGDC-standardized metadata (xml file format). We are including these original files because they contain metadata only accessible using ESRI programs at this time, and so that the relationship between shapefiles and xml files is maintained. Individual xml files can be opened (without a GIS-specific program) using TextEdit or Notepad. Since ESRI’s compatibility with FGDC metadata has changed since the generation of these files, many shapefiles will require upgrading to be compatible with ESRI’s latest versions of geospatial software. These details are also noted in the “niwot_geospatial_data_list_07012021” file.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://urbantide.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/ESC+software+license.pdfhttps://urbantide.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/ESC+software+license.pdf
This dataset contains both a PDF report of the LEAR in question, and an Excel spreadsheet of data that sits behind the graphs and maps in the report. The report can be found under Additional Documention section below, and the spreadsheet of backing under Raw Files.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
About Datasets:
Domain : Sales Project: McDonalds Sales Analysis Project Dataset: START-Dashboard Dataset Type: Excel Data Dataset Size: 100 records
KPI's: 1. Customer Satisfaction 2. Sales by Country 2022 3. 2021-2022 Sales Trend 4. Sales 5. Profit 6. Customers
Process: 1. Understanding the problem 2. Data Collection 3. Exploring and analyzing the data 4. Interpreting the results
This data contains dashboard, hyperlink, shapes, icons, map, radar chart, line chart, doughnut chart, KPIs, formatting.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
This data set is perfect for practicing your analytical skills for Power BI, Tableau, Excel, or transform it into a CSV to practice SQL.
This use case mimics transactions for a fictional eCommerce website named EverMart Online. The 3 tables in this data set are all logically connected together with IDs.
My Power BI Use Case Explanation - Using Microsoft Power BI, I made dynamic data visualizations for revenue reporting and customer behavior reporting.
Revenue Reporting Visuals - Data Card Visual that dynamically shows Total Products Listed, Total Unique Customers, Total Transactions, and Total Revenue by Total Sales, Product Sales, or Categorical Sales. - Line Graph Visual that shows Total Revenue by Month of the entire year. This graph also changes to calculate Total Revenue by Month for the Total Sales by Product and Total Sales by Category if selected. - Bar Graph Visual showcasing Total Sales by Product. - Donut Chart Visual showcasing Total Sales by Category of Product.
Customer Behavior Reporting Visuals - Data Card Visual that dynamically shows Total Products Listed, Total Unique Customers, Total Transactions, and Total Revenue by Total or by continent selected on the map. - Interactive Map Visual showing key statistics for the continent selected. - The key statistics are presented on the tool tip when you select a continent, and the following statistics show for that continent: - Continent Name - Customer Total - Percentage of Products Sold - Percentage of Total Customers - Percentage of Total Transactions - Percentage of Total Revenue
Facebook
Twitterhttps://urbantide.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/ESC+software+license.pdfhttps://urbantide.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/ESC+software+license.pdf
This dataset contains both a PDF report of the LEAR in question, and an Excel spreadsheet of data that sits behind the graphs and maps in the report. The report can be found under Additional Documention section below, and the spreadsheet of backing under Raw Files.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://urbantide.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/ESC+software+license.pdfhttps://urbantide.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/ESC+software+license.pdf
This dataset contains both a PDF report of the LEAR in question, and an Excel spreadsheet of data that sits behind the graphs and maps in the report. The report can be found under Additional Documention section below, and the spreadsheet of backing under Raw Files.
Facebook
TwitterThis dataset contains Weekly U.S. Ending Stocks of Distillate Fuel Oil 2015-2022. Data from US Energy information administration.This series is available through the EIA open data API and can be downloaded to Excel or embedded as an interactive chart or map on your website.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://urbantide.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/ESC+software+license.pdfhttps://urbantide.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/ESC+software+license.pdf
This dataset contains both a PDF report of the LEAR in question, and an Excel spreadsheet of data that sits behind the graphs and maps in the report. The report can be found under Additional Documention section below, and the spreadsheet of backing under Raw Files.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://urbantide.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/ESC+software+license.pdfhttps://urbantide.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/ESC+software+license.pdf
This dataset contains both a PDF report of the LEAR in question, and an Excel spreadsheet of data that sits behind the graphs and maps in the report. The report can be found under Additional Documention section below, and the spreadsheet of backing under Raw Files.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://urbantide.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/ESC+software+license.pdfhttps://urbantide.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/ESC+software+license.pdf
This dataset contains both a PDF report of the LEAR in question, and an Excel spreadsheet of data that sits behind the graphs and maps in the report. The report can be found under Additional Documention section below, and the spreadsheet of backing under Raw Files.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
About Datasets:
Domain : Sales Project: Coca Cola Sales Analysis Datasets: Power BI Dataset vF Dataset Type: Excel Data Dataset Size: 52k+ records
KPI's: 1. Analyze Profit Margins per Brand 2. Sales by Region 3. Price per unit 4. Operating Profit 5. Additional Analysis
Process: 1. Understanding the problem 2. Data Collection 3. Exploring and analyzing the data 4. Interpreting the results
This data contains Power Query, Q&A visual, Key influencers visual, map chart, matrix, dynamic timeline, dashboard, formatting, text box.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://urbantide.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/ESC+software+license.pdfhttps://urbantide.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/ESC+software+license.pdf
This dataset contains both a PDF report of the LEAR in question, and an Excel spreadsheet of data that sits behind the graphs and maps in the report. The report can be found under Additional Documention section below, and the spreadsheet of backing under Raw Files.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://urbantide.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/ESC+software+license.pdfhttps://urbantide.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/ESC+software+license.pdf
This dataset contains both a PDF report of the LEAR in question, and an Excel spreadsheet of data that sits behind the graphs and maps in the report. The report can be found under Additional Documention section below, and the spreadsheet of backing under Raw Files.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://urbantide.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/ESC+software+license.pdfhttps://urbantide.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/ESC+software+license.pdf
This dataset contains both a PDF report of the LEAR in question, and an Excel spreadsheet of data that sits behind the graphs and maps in the report. The report can be found under Additional Documention section below, and the spreadsheet of backing under Raw Files.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Data set includes:1) R software code for building entire array polygon (EAP). For constructing polygon "chartJSRadar" library was adopted, source: https://github.com/mangothecat/radarchart2) Sketch map of Radar chart3) Radar chart of EAP4) Excel data containing calculation of Urban comprehensive carrying capacity for Almaty city
Facebook
TwitterAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
About Datasets: - Domain : Finance - Project: Bank loan of customers - Datasets: Finance_1.xlsx & Finance_2.xlsx - Dataset Type: Excel Data - Dataset Size: Each Excel file has 39k+ records
KPI's: 1. Year wise loan amount Stats 2. Grade and sub grade wise revol_bal 3. Total Payment for Verified Status Vs Total Payment for Non Verified Status 4. State wise loan status 5. Month wise loan status 6. Get more insights based on your understanding of the data
Process: 1. Understanding the problem 2. Data Collection 3. Data Cleaning 4. Exploring and analyzing the data 5. Interpreting the results
This data contains stacked column chart, Donut chart, Stacked area chart, pie chart, matrix, slicer, treemap, clustered column chart, Map, Dashboard, Page Navigator, card, text box.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://urbantide.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/ESC+software+license.pdfhttps://urbantide.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/ESC+software+license.pdf
This dataset contains both a PDF report of the LEAR in question, and an Excel spreadsheet of data that sits behind the graphs and maps in the report. The report can be found under Additional Documention section below, and the spreadsheet of backing under Raw Files.