Facebook
TwitterExcel spreadsheets by species (4 letter code is abbreviation for genus and species used in study, year 2010 or 2011 is year data collected, SH indicates data for Science Hub, date is date of file preparation). The data in a file are described in a read me file which is the first worksheet in each file. Each row in a species spreadsheet is for one plot (plant). The data themselves are in the data worksheet. One file includes a read me description of the column in the date set for chemical analysis. In this file one row is an herbicide treatment and sample for chemical analysis (if taken). This dataset is associated with the following publication: Olszyk , D., T. Pfleeger, T. Shiroyama, M. Blakely-Smith, E. Lee , and M. Plocher. Plant reproduction is altered by simulated herbicide drift toconstructed plant communities. ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Pensacola, FL, USA, 36(10): 2799-2813, (2017).
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This article describes a free, open-source collection of templates for the popular Excel (2013, and later versions) spreadsheet program. These templates are spreadsheet files that allow easy and intuitive learning and the implementation of practical examples concerning descriptive statistics, random variables, confidence intervals, and hypothesis testing. Although they are designed to be used with Excel, they can also be employed with other free spreadsheet programs (changing some particular formulas). Moreover, we exploit some possibilities of the ActiveX controls of the Excel Developer Menu to perform interactive Gaussian density charts. Finally, it is important to note that they can be often embedded in a web page, so it is not necessary to employ Excel software for their use. These templates have been designed as a useful tool to teach basic statistics and to carry out data analysis even when the students are not familiar with Excel. Additionally, they can be used as a complement to other analytical software packages. They aim to assist students in learning statistics, within an intuitive working environment. Supplementary materials with the Excel templates are available online.
Facebook
TwitterThis dataset was created by Aziza Afrin
Facebook
TwitterThe annual Retail store data CD-ROM is an easy-to-use tool for quickly discovering retail trade patterns and trends. The current product presents results from the 1999 and 2000 Annual Retail Store and Annual Retail Chain surveys. This product contains numerous cross-classified data tables using the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). The data tables provide access to a wide range of financial variables, such as revenues, expenses, inventory, sales per square footage (chain stores only) and the number of stores. Most data tables contain detailed information on industry (as low as 5-digit NAICS codes), geography (Canada, provinces and territories) and store type (chains, independents, franchises). The electronic product also contains survey metadata, questionnaires, information on industry codes and definitions, and the list of retail chain store respondents.
Facebook
TwitterCC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
Sample data for exercises in Further Adventures in Data Cleaning.
Facebook
TwitterThis dataset was created by Pinky Verma
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
To create the dataset, the top 10 countries leading in the incidence of COVID-19 in the world were selected as of October 22, 2020 (on the eve of the second full of pandemics), which are presented in the Global 500 ranking for 2020: USA, India, Brazil, Russia, Spain, France and Mexico. For each of these countries, no more than 10 of the largest transnational corporations included in the Global 500 rating for 2020 and 2019 were selected separately. The arithmetic averages were calculated and the change (increase) in indicators such as profitability and profitability of enterprises, their ranking position (competitiveness), asset value and number of employees. The arithmetic mean values of these indicators for all countries of the sample were found, characterizing the situation in international entrepreneurship as a whole in the context of the COVID-19 crisis in 2020 on the eve of the second wave of the pandemic. The data is collected in a general Microsoft Excel table. Dataset is a unique database that combines COVID-19 statistics and entrepreneurship statistics. The dataset is flexible data that can be supplemented with data from other countries and newer statistics on the COVID-19 pandemic. Due to the fact that the data in the dataset are not ready-made numbers, but formulas, when adding and / or changing the values in the original table at the beginning of the dataset, most of the subsequent tables will be automatically recalculated and the graphs will be updated. This allows the dataset to be used not just as an array of data, but as an analytical tool for automating scientific research on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and crisis on international entrepreneurship. The dataset includes not only tabular data, but also charts that provide data visualization. The dataset contains not only actual, but also forecast data on morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 for the period of the second wave of the pandemic in 2020. The forecasts are presented in the form of a normal distribution of predicted values and the probability of their occurrence in practice. This allows for a broad scenario analysis of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and crisis on international entrepreneurship, substituting various predicted morbidity and mortality rates in risk assessment tables and obtaining automatically calculated consequences (changes) on the characteristics of international entrepreneurship. It is also possible to substitute the actual values identified in the process and following the results of the second wave of the pandemic to check the reliability of pre-made forecasts and conduct a plan-fact analysis. The dataset contains not only the numerical values of the initial and predicted values of the set of studied indicators, but also their qualitative interpretation, reflecting the presence and level of risks of a pandemic and COVID-19 crisis for international entrepreneurship.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
PROJECT OBJECTIVE
We are a part of XYZ Co Pvt Ltd company who is in the business of organizing the sports events at international level. Countries nominate sportsmen from different departments and our team has been given the responsibility to systematize the membership roster and generate different reports as per business requirements.
Questions (KPIs)
TASK 1: STANDARDIZING THE DATASET
TASK 2: DATA FORMATING
TASK 3: SUMMARIZE DATA - PIVOT TABLE (Use SPORTSMEN worksheet after attempting TASK 1) • Create a PIVOT table in the worksheet ANALYSIS, starting at cell B3,with the following details:
TASK 4: SUMMARIZE DATA - EXCEL FUNCTIONS (Use SPORTSMEN worksheet after attempting TASK 1)
• Create a SUMMARY table in the worksheet ANALYSIS,starting at cell G4, with the following details:
TASK 5: GENERATE REPORT - PIVOT TABLE (Use SPORTSMEN worksheet after attempting TASK 1)
• Create a PIVOT table report in the worksheet REPORT, starting at cell A3, with the following information:
Process
Facebook
TwitterThe dataset includes customer id,Martial Status,Gender,Income,Children,Education,Occupation,Home Owner,Cars,Commute Distance,Region,Age,Purchased Bike. Blog
Facebook
TwitterThe link for the Excel project to download can be found on GitHub here.
It includes the raw data, Pivot Tables, and an interactive dashboard with Pivot Charts and Slicers. The project also includes business questions and the formulas I used to answer. The image below is included for ease.
https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F12904052%2F61e460b5f6a1fa73cfaaa33aa8107bd5%2FBusinessQuestions.png?generation=1686190703261971&alt=media" alt="">
The link for the Tableau adjusted dashboard can be found here.
A screenshot of the interactive Excel dashboard is also included below for ease.
https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F12904052%2Fe581f1fce8afc732f7823904da9e4cce%2FScooter%20Dashboard%20Image.png?generation=1686190815608343&alt=media" alt="">
Facebook
TwitterDownload Employee Travel Excel SheetThis dataset contains information about the employee travel expenses for the year 2020. Details are provided on the employee (name, title, department), the travel (dates, location, purpose) and the cost (expenses, recoveries). Expenses are broken down in separate tabs by Quarter (Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4). Updated quarterly when expenses are prepared. Expenses for other years are available in separate datasets.
Facebook
TwitterThis dataset contains the valuation template the researcher can use to retrieve real-time Excel stock price and stock price in Google Sheets. The dataset is provided by Finsheet, the leading financial data provider for spreadsheet users. To get more financial data, visit the website and explore their function. For instance, if a researcher would like to get the last 30 years of income statement for Meta Platform Inc, the syntax would be =FS_EquityFullFinancials("FB", "ic", "FY", 30) In addition, this syntax will return the latest stock price for Caterpillar Inc right in your spreadsheet. =FS_Latest("CAT") If you need assistance with any of the function, feel free to reach out to their customer support team. To get starter, install their Excel and Google Sheets add-on.
Facebook
TwitterOpen Government Licence 3.0http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
License information was derived automatically
Standard error reference tables for the Retail Sales Index in Great Britain.
Facebook
TwitterExample of a filtered Microsoft Excel spreadsheet for TaAMY2 single null mutant detection (selected data).
Facebook
TwitterThis Excel template is an example taken from the GEO web site (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/info/spreadsheet.html#GAtemplates) which has been modified to conform to the SysMO JERM (Just Enough Results Model). Using templates helps with searching and comparing data as well as making it easier to submit data to public repositories for publications.
Facebook
TwitterThe documentation covers Enterprise Survey panel datasets that were collected in Slovenia in 2009, 2013 and 2019.
The Slovenia ES 2009 was conducted between 2008 and 2009. The Slovenia ES 2013 was conducted between March 2013 and September 2013. Finally, the Slovenia ES 2019 was conducted between December 2018 and November 2019. The objective of the Enterprise Survey is to gain an understanding of what firms experience in the private sector.
As part of its strategic goal of building a climate for investment, job creation, and sustainable growth, the World Bank has promoted improving the business environment as a key strategy for development, which has led to a systematic effort in collecting enterprise data across countries. The Enterprise Surveys (ES) are an ongoing World Bank project in collecting both objective data based on firms' experiences and enterprises' perception of the environment in which they operate.
National
The primary sampling unit of the study is the establishment. An establishment is a physical location where business is carried out and where industrial operations take place or services are provided. A firm may be composed of one or more establishments. For example, a brewery may have several bottling plants and several establishments for distribution. For the purposes of this survey an establishment must take its own financial decisions and have its own financial statements separate from those of the firm. An establishment must also have its own management and control over its payroll.
As it is standard for the ES, the Slovenia ES was based on the following size stratification: small (5 to 19 employees), medium (20 to 99 employees), and large (100 or more employees).
Sample survey data [ssd]
The sample for Slovenia ES 2009, 2013, 2019 were selected using stratified random sampling, following the methodology explained in the Sampling Manual for Slovenia 2009 ES and for Slovenia 2013 ES, and in the Sampling Note for 2019 Slovenia ES.
Three levels of stratification were used in this country: industry, establishment size, and oblast (region). The original sample designs with specific information of the industries and regions chosen are included in the attached Excel file (Sampling Report.xls.) for Slovenia 2009 ES. For Slovenia 2013 and 2019 ES, specific information of the industries and regions chosen is described in the "The Slovenia 2013 Enterprise Surveys Data Set" and "The Slovenia 2019 Enterprise Surveys Data Set" reports respectively, Appendix E.
For the Slovenia 2009 ES, industry stratification was designed in the way that follows: the universe was stratified into manufacturing industries, services industries, and one residual (core) sector as defined in the sampling manual. Each industry had a target of 90 interviews. For the manufacturing industries sample sizes were inflated by about 17% to account for potential non-response cases when requesting sensitive financial data and also because of likely attrition in future surveys that would affect the construction of a panel. For the other industries (residuals) sample sizes were inflated by about 12% to account for under sampling in firms in service industries.
For Slovenia 2013 ES, industry stratification was designed in the way that follows: the universe was stratified into one manufacturing industry, and two service industries (retail, and other services).
Finally, for Slovenia 2019 ES, three levels of stratification were used in this country: industry, establishment size, and region. The original sample design with specific information of the industries and regions chosen is described in "The Slovenia 2019 Enterprise Surveys Data Set" report, Appendix C. Industry stratification was done as follows: Manufacturing – combining all the relevant activities (ISIC Rev. 4.0 codes 10-33), Retail (ISIC 47), and Other Services (ISIC 41-43, 45, 46, 49-53, 55, 56, 58, 61, 62, 79, 95).
For Slovenia 2009 and 2013 ES, size stratification was defined following the standardized definition for the rollout: small (5 to 19 employees), medium (20 to 99 employees), and large (more than 99 employees). For stratification purposes, the number of employees was defined on the basis of reported permanent full-time workers. This seems to be an appropriate definition of the labor force since seasonal/casual/part-time employment is not a common practice, except in the sectors of construction and agriculture.
For Slovenia 2009 ES, regional stratification was defined in 2 regions. These regions are Vzhodna Slovenija and Zahodna Slovenija. The Slovenia sample contains panel data. The wave 1 panel “Investment Climate Private Enterprise Survey implemented in Slovenia” consisted of 223 establishments interviewed in 2005. A total of 57 establishments have been re-interviewed in the 2008 Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey.
For Slovenia 2013 ES, regional stratification was defined in 2 regions (city and the surrounding business area) throughout Slovenia.
Finally, for Slovenia 2019 ES, regional stratification was done across two regions: Eastern Slovenia (NUTS code SI03) and Western Slovenia (SI04).
Computer Assisted Personal Interview [capi]
Questionnaires have common questions (core module) and respectfully additional manufacturing- and services-specific questions. The eligible manufacturing industries have been surveyed using the Manufacturing questionnaire (includes the core module, plus manufacturing specific questions). Retail firms have been interviewed using the Services questionnaire (includes the core module plus retail specific questions) and the residual eligible services have been covered using the Services questionnaire (includes the core module). Each variation of the questionnaire is identified by the index variable, a0.
Survey non-response must be differentiated from item non-response. The former refers to refusals to participate in the survey altogether whereas the latter refers to the refusals to answer some specific questions. Enterprise Surveys suffer from both problems and different strategies were used to address these issues.
Item non-response was addressed by two strategies: a- For sensitive questions that may generate negative reactions from the respondent, such as corruption or tax evasion, enumerators were instructed to collect the refusal to respond as (-8). b- Establishments with incomplete information were re-contacted in order to complete this information, whenever necessary. However, there were clear cases of low response.
For 2009 and 2013 Slovenia ES, the survey non-response was addressed by maximizing efforts to contact establishments that were initially selected for interview. Up to 4 attempts were made to contact the establishment for interview at different times/days of the week before a replacement establishment (with similar strata characteristics) was suggested for interview. Survey non-response did occur but substitutions were made in order to potentially achieve strata-specific goals. Further research is needed on survey non-response in the Enterprise Surveys regarding potential introduction of bias.
For 2009, the number of contacted establishments per realized interview was 6.18. This number is the result of two factors: explicit refusals to participate in the survey, as reflected by the rate of rejection (which includes rejections of the screener and the main survey) and the quality of the sample frame, as represented by the presence of ineligible units. The relatively low ratio of contacted establishments per realized interview (6.18) suggests that the main source of error in estimates in the Slovenia may be selection bias and not frame inaccuracy.
For 2013, the number of realized interviews per contacted establishment was 25%. This number is the result of two factors: explicit refusals to participate in the survey, as reflected by the rate of rejection (which includes rejections of the screener and the main survey) and the quality of the sample frame, as represented by the presence of ineligible units. The number of rejections per contact was 44%.
Finally, for 2019, the number of interviews per contacted establishments was 9.7%. This number is the result of two factors: explicit refusals to participate in the survey, as reflected by the rate of rejection (which includes rejections of the screener and the main survey) and the quality of the sample frame, as represented by the presence of ineligible units. The share of rejections per contact was 75.2%.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This is a spreadsheet of 1 of 10 companies in the shoe industry. Highlighting COGS, Total Revenue, Market share and Industry share.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
1.Introduction
Sales data collection is a crucial aspect of any manufacturing industry as it provides valuable insights about the performance of products, customer behaviour, and market trends. By gathering and analysing this data, manufacturers can make informed decisions about product development, pricing, and marketing strategies in Internet of Things (IoT) business environments like the dairy supply chain.
One of the most important benefits of the sales data collection process is that it allows manufacturers to identify their most successful products and target their efforts towards those areas. For example, if a manufacturer could notice that a particular product is selling well in a certain region, this information could be utilised to develop new products, optimise the supply chain or improve existing ones to meet the changing needs of customers.
This dataset includes information about 7 of MEVGAL’s products [1]. According to the above information the data published will help researchers to understand the dynamics of the dairy market and its consumption patterns, which is creating the fertile ground for synergies between academia and industry and eventually help the industry in making informed decisions regarding product development, pricing and market strategies in the IoT playground. The use of this dataset could also aim to understand the impact of various external factors on the dairy market such as the economic, environmental, and technological factors. It could help in understanding the current state of the dairy industry and identifying potential opportunities for growth and development.
Please cite the following papers when using this dataset:
I. Siniosoglou, K. Xouveroudis, V. Argyriou, T. Lagkas, S. K. Goudos, K. E. Psannis and P. Sarigiannidis, "Evaluating the Effect of Volatile Federated Timeseries on Modern DNNs: Attention over Long/Short Memory," in the 12th International Conference on Circuits and Systems Technologies (MOCAST 2023), April 2023, Accepted
The dataset includes data regarding the daily sales of a series of dairy product codes offered by MEVGAL. In particular, the dataset includes information gathered by the logistics division and agencies within the industrial infrastructures overseeing the production of each product code. The products included in this dataset represent the daily sales and logistics of a variety of yogurt-based stock. Each of the different files include the logistics for that product on a daily basis for three years, from 2020 to 2022.
3.1 Data Collection
The process of building this dataset involves several steps to ensure that the data is accurate, comprehensive and relevant.
The first step is to determine the specific data that is needed to support the business objectives of the industry, i.e., in this publication’s case the daily sales data.
Once the data requirements have been identified, the next step is to implement an effective sales data collection method. In MEVGAL’s case this is conducted through direct communication and reports generated each day by representatives & selling points.
It is also important for MEVGAL to ensure that the data collection process conducted is in an ethical and compliant manner, adhering to data privacy laws and regulation. The industry also has a data management plan in place to ensure that the data is securely stored and protected from unauthorised access.
The published dataset is consisted of 13 features providing information about the date and the number of products that have been sold. Finally, the dataset was anonymised in consideration to the privacy requirement of the data owner (MEVGAL).
File
Period
Number of Samples (days)
product 1 2020.xlsx
01/01/2020–31/12/2020
363
product 1 2021.xlsx
01/01/2021–31/12/2021
364
product 1 2022.xlsx
01/01/2022–31/12/2022
365
product 2 2020.xlsx
01/01/2020–31/12/2020
363
product 2 2021.xlsx
01/01/2021–31/12/2021
364
product 2 2022.xlsx
01/01/2022–31/12/2022
365
product 3 2020.xlsx
01/01/2020–31/12/2020
363
product 3 2021.xlsx
01/01/2021–31/12/2021
364
product 3 2022.xlsx
01/01/2022–31/12/2022
365
product 4 2020.xlsx
01/01/2020–31/12/2020
363
product 4 2021.xlsx
01/01/2021–31/12/2021
364
product 4 2022.xlsx
01/01/2022–31/12/2022
364
product 5 2020.xlsx
01/01/2020–31/12/2020
363
product 5 2021.xlsx
01/01/2021–31/12/2021
364
product 5 2022.xlsx
01/01/2022–31/12/2022
365
product 6 2020.xlsx
01/01/2020–31/12/2020
362
product 6 2021.xlsx
01/01/2021–31/12/2021
364
product 6 2022.xlsx
01/01/2022–31/12/2022
365
product 7 2020.xlsx
01/01/2020–31/12/2020
362
product 7 2021.xlsx
01/01/2021–31/12/2021
364
product 7 2022.xlsx
01/01/2022–31/12/2022
365
3.2 Dataset Overview
The following table enumerates and explains the features included across all of the included files.
Feature
Description
Unit
Day
day of the month
-
Month
Month
-
Year
Year
-
daily_unit_sales
Daily sales - the amount of products, measured in units, that during that specific day were sold
units
previous_year_daily_unit_sales
Previous Year’s sales - the amount of products, measured in units, that during that specific day were sold the previous year
units
percentage_difference_daily_unit_sales
The percentage difference between the two above values
%
daily_unit_sales_kg
The amount of products, measured in kilograms, that during that specific day were sold
kg
previous_year_daily_unit_sales_kg
Previous Year’s sales - the amount of products, measured in kilograms, that during that specific day were sold, the previous year
kg
percentage_difference_daily_unit_sales_kg
The percentage difference between the two above values
kg
daily_unit_returns_kg
The percentage of the products that were shipped to selling points and were returned
%
previous_year_daily_unit_returns_kg
The percentage of the products that were shipped to selling points and were returned the previous year
%
points_of_distribution
The amount of sales representatives through which the product was sold to the market for this year
previous_year_points_of_distribution
The amount of sales representatives through which the product was sold to the market for the same day for the previous year
Table 1 – Dataset Feature Description
4.1 Dataset Structure
The provided dataset has the following structure:
Where:
Name
Type
Property
Readme.docx
Report
A File that contains the documentation of the Dataset.
product X
Folder
A folder containing the data of a product X.
product X YYYY.xlsx
Data file
An excel file containing the sales data of product X for year YYYY.
Table 2 - Dataset File Description
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 957406 (TERMINET).
References
[1] MEVGAL is a Greek dairy production company
Facebook
TwitterThe intention is to collect data for the calendar year 2009 (or the nearest year for which each business keeps its accounts. The survey is considered a one-off survey, although for accurate NAs, such a survey should be conducted at least every five years to enable regular updating of the ratios, etc., needed to adjust the ongoing indicator data (mainly VAGST) to NA concepts. The questionnaire will be drafted by FSD, largely following the previous BAS, updated to current accounting terminology where necessary. The questionnaire will be pilot tested, using some accountants who are likely to complete a number of the forms on behalf of their business clients, and a small sample of businesses. Consultations will also include Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Labour, Central Bank of Samoa (CBS), Samoa Tourism Authority, Chamber of Commerce, and other business associations (hotels, retail, etc.).
The questionnaire will collect a number of items of information about the business ownership, locations at which it operates and each establishment for which detailed data can be provided (in the case of complex businesses), contact information, and other general information needed to clearly identify each unique business. The main body of the questionnaire will collect data on income and expenses, to enable value added to be derived accurately. The questionnaire will also collect data on capital formation, and will contain supplementary pages for relevant industries to collect volume of production data for selected commodities and to collect information to enable an estimate of value added generated by key tourism activities.
The principal user of the data will be FSD which will incorporate the survey data into benchmarks for the NA, mainly on the current published production measure of GDP. The information on capital formation and other relevant data will also be incorporated into the experimental estimates of expenditure on GDP. The supplementary data on volumes of production will be used by FSD to redevelop the industrial production index which has recently been transferred under the SBS from the CBS. The general information about the business ownership, etc., will be used to update the Business Register.
Outputs will be produced in a number of formats, including a printed report containing descriptive information of the survey design, data tables, and analysis of the results. The report will also be made available on the SBS website in “.pdf” format, and the tables will be available on the SBS website in excel tables. Data by region may also be produced, although at a higher level of aggregation than the national data. All data will be fully confidentialised, to protect the anonymity of all respondents. Consideration may also be made to provide, for selected analytical users, confidentialised unit record files (CURFs).
A high level of accuracy is needed because the principal purpose of the survey is to develop revised benchmarks for the NA. The initial plan was that the survey will be conducted as a stratified sample survey, with full enumeration of large establishments and a sample of the remainder.
v01: This is the first version of the documentation. Basic raw data, obtained from data entry.
The scope of the 2009 BAS is all employing businesses in the private sector other than those involved in agricultural activities.
Included are:
· Non-governmental organizations (NGOs, not-for profit organizations, etc.);
· Government Public Bodies
Excluded are:
· Non-employing units (e.g., market sellers);
· Government ministries, constitutional offices and those public bodies involved in public administration and included in the Central Government Budget Sector;
· Agricultural units (unless large scale/commercial - if the Agriculture census only covers household activities);
· “Non-resident” bodies such as international agencies, diplomatic missions (e.g., high commissions and embassies, UNDP, FAO, WHO);
The survey coverage is of all businesses in scope as defined above. Statistical units relevant to the survey are the enterprise and the establishment. The enterprise is an institutional unit and generally corresponds to legal entities such as a company, cooperative, partnership or sole proprietorship. The establishment is an institutional unit or part of an institutional unit, which engages in one, or predominantly one, type of economic activity. Sufficient data must be available to derive or meaningfully estimate value added in order to recognize an establishment. The main statistical unit from which data will be collected in the survey is the establishment. For most businesses there will be a one-to-one relationship between the enterprise and the establishment, i.e., simple enterprises will comprise only one establishment. The purpose of collecting data from establishments (rather than from enterprises) is to enable the most accurate industry estimates of value added possible.
Facebook
TwitterList of the previous tables relating to detention from June 2023 onwards. Most tables published on detention as part of the Immigration system statistics release contain a time series of data, so are not available here. Previous tables are available here if they contain data that would be otherwise lost when publishing a new release, for example tables without a timeseries.
For summary tables published prior to June 2023, please see previous editions of the Immigration system statistics quarterly release.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/691468f2db01ecfcf96fc815/detention-summary-jun-2025-tables.ods">Detention summary tables, year ending June 2025 (ODS, 77 KB)
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/68a5cf6d2a1dfc29763d5163/detention-summary-mar-2025-tables.xlsx">Detention summary tables, year ending March 2025 (MS Excel Spreadsheet, 135 KB)
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/681c62dd3f1c73824ee3e56b/detention-summary-dec-2024-tables.ods">Detention summary tables, year ending December 2024 (ODS, 79.8 KB)
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67bf10ad16dc9038974dbb88/detention-summary-sep-24-tables.ods">Detention summary tables, year ending September 2024 (ODS, 80 KB)
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6731dc6a2cccb48648badad7/detention-summary-jun-24-tables.ods">Detention summary tables, year ending June 2024 (ODS, 79.9 KB)
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66bef3e8c32366481ca491c3/detention-summary-mar-24-tables.ods">Detention summary tables, year ending March 2024 (ODS, 69.1 KB)
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/664609a6bd01f5ed32793d3e/detention-summary-dec-2023-tables.ods">Detention summary tables, year ending December 2023 (ODS, 65.7 KB)
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/65ddd8ddb8da630011c862ae/detention-summary-sep-2023-tables.ods">Detention summary tables, year ending September 2023 (ODS, 67.5 KB)
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/655bb17e544aea000dfb3100/detention-summary-jun-2023-tables.ods">Detention summary tables, year ending June 2023 (ODS, 67.1 KB)
Immigration system statistics data tables
"https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/immigration-statistics-quarterly-release">Im
Facebook
TwitterExcel spreadsheets by species (4 letter code is abbreviation for genus and species used in study, year 2010 or 2011 is year data collected, SH indicates data for Science Hub, date is date of file preparation). The data in a file are described in a read me file which is the first worksheet in each file. Each row in a species spreadsheet is for one plot (plant). The data themselves are in the data worksheet. One file includes a read me description of the column in the date set for chemical analysis. In this file one row is an herbicide treatment and sample for chemical analysis (if taken). This dataset is associated with the following publication: Olszyk , D., T. Pfleeger, T. Shiroyama, M. Blakely-Smith, E. Lee , and M. Plocher. Plant reproduction is altered by simulated herbicide drift toconstructed plant communities. ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Pensacola, FL, USA, 36(10): 2799-2813, (2017).