Samples relating to 12 analyses of lay-theories of resilience among participants from USA, New Zealand, India, Iran, Russia (Moscow; Kazan). Central variables relate to participant endorsements of resilience descriptors. Demographic data includes (though not for all samples), Sex/Gender, Age, Ethnicity, Work, and Educational Status. Analysis 1. USA Exploratory Factor Analysis dataAnalysis 2. New Zealand Exploratory Factor Analysis dataAnalysis 3. India Exploratory Factor Analysis dataAnalysis 4. Iran Exploratory Factor Analysis dataAnalysis 5. Russian (Moscow) Exploratory Factor Analysis dataAnalysis 6. Russian (Kazan) Exploratory Factor Analysis dataAnalysis 7. USA Confirmatory Factor Analysis dataAnalysis 8. New Zealand Confirmatory Factor Analysis dataAnalysis 9. India Confirmatory Factor Analysis dataAnalysis 10. Iran Confirmatory Factor Analysis dataAnalysis 11. Russian (Moscow) Confirmatory Factor Analysis dataAnalysis 12. Russian (Kazan) Confirmatory Factor Analysis data

The dataset includes YouTube trending videos statistics for Mediterranean countries on 2022-11-07. It contains 15 columns and it's related to 19 countries:

IT - Italy ES - Spain GR - Greece HR - Croatia TR - Turkey AL - Albania DZ - Algeria EG - Egypt LY - Lybia TN - Tunisia MA - Morocco IL - Israel ME - Montenegro LB - Lebanon FR - France BA - Bosnia and Herzegovina MT - Malta SI - Slovenia CY - Cyprus

SY - Syria

The columns are, instead, the following:

country: where is the country in which the video was published. video_id: video identification number. Each video has one. You can find it clicking on a video with the right button and selecting 'stats for nerds'. title: title of the video. publishedAt: publication date of the video. channelId: identification number of the channel who published the video. channelTitle: name of the channel who published the video. categoryId: identification number category of the video. Each number corresponds to a certain category. For example, 10 corresponds to 'music' category. Check here for the complete list. trending_date: trending date of the video. tags: tags present in the video. view_count: view count of the video. comment_count: number of comments in the video. thumbnail_link: the link of the image that appears before clicking the video. -comments_disabled: tells if the comments are disabled or not for a certain video. -ratings_disabled: tells if the rating is disabled or not for that video. -description: description below the video. Inspiration You can perform an exploratory data analysis of the dataset, working with Pandas or Numpy (if you use Python) or other data analysis libraries; and you can practice to run queries using SQL or the Pandas functions. Also, it's possible to analyze the titles, the tags and the description of the videos to search for relevant information. Remember to upvote if you found the dataset useful :).

License

CC0

Original Data Source: YouTube Trending Videos of the Day

Context

The Customer Shopping Preferences Dataset offers valuable insights into consumer behavior and purchasing patterns. Understanding customer preferences and trends is critical for businesses to tailor their products, marketing strategies, and overall customer experience. This dataset captures a wide range of customer attributes including age, gender, purchase history, preferred payment methods, frequency of purchases, and more. Analyzing this data can help businesses make informed decisions, optimize product offerings, and enhance customer satisfaction. The dataset stands as a valuable resource for businesses aiming to align their strategies with customer needs and preferences. It's important to note that this dataset is a Synthetic Dataset Created for Beginners to learn more about Data Analysis and Machine Learning.

Content

This dataset encompasses various features related to customer shopping preferences, gathering essential information for businesses seeking to enhance their understanding of their customer base. The features include customer age, gender, purchase amount, preferred payment methods, frequency of purchases, and feedback ratings. Additionally, data on the type of items purchased, shopping frequency, preferred shopping seasons, and interactions with promotional offers is included. With a collection of 3900 records, this dataset serves as a foundation for businesses looking to apply data-driven insights for better decision-making and customer-centric strategies.

Dataset Glossary (Column-wise)

• Customer ID - Unique identifier for each customer
• Age - Age of the customer
• Gender - Gender of the customer (Male/Female)
• Item Purchased - The item purchased by the customer
• Category - Category of the item purchased
• Purchase Amount (USD) - The amount of the purchase in USD
• Location - Location where the purchase was made
• Size - Size of the purchased item
• Color - Color of the purchased item
• Season - Season during which the purchase was made
• Review Rating - Rating given by the customer for the purchased item
• Subscription Status - Indicates if the customer has a subscription (Yes/No)
• Shipping Type - Type of shipping chosen by the customer
• Discount Applied - Indicates if a discount was applied to the purchase (Yes/No)
• Promo Code Used - Indicates if a promo code was used for the purchase (Yes/No)
• Previous Purchases - The total count of transactions concluded by the customer at the store, excluding the ongoing transaction
• Payment Method - Customer's most preferred payment method
• Frequency of Purchases - Frequency at which the customer makes purchases (e.g., Weekly, Fortnightly, Monthly)

Structure of the Dataset

https://i.imgur.com/6UEqejq.png" alt="">

Acknowledgement

This dataset is a synthetic creation generated using ChatGPT to simulate a realistic customer shopping experience. Its purpose is to provide a platform for beginners and data enthusiasts, allowing them to create, enjoy, practice, and learn from a dataset that mirrors real-world customer shopping behavior. The aim is to foster learning and experimentation in a simulated environment, encouraging a deeper understanding of data analysis and interpretation in the context of consumer preferences and retail scenarios.

Cover Photo by: Freepik

Thumbnail by: Clothing icons created by Flat Icons - Flaticon

Sonification for Exploratory Data Analysis #### Chapter 8: Sonification Models In Chapter 8 of the thesis, 6 sonification models are presented to give some examples for the framework of Model-Based Sonification, developed in Chapter 7. Sonification models determine the rendering of the sonification and possible interactions. The "model in mind" helps the user to interprete the sound with respect to the data. ##### 8.1 Data Sonograms Data Sonograms use spherical expanding shock waves to excite linear oscillators which are represented by point masses in model space. * Table 8.2, page 87: Sound examples for Data Sonograms File: Iris dataset: started in plot (a) at S0 (b) at S1 (c) at S2
10d noisy circle dataset: started in plot (c) at S0 (mean) (d) at S1 (edge)
10d Gaussian: plot (d) started at S0
3 clusters: Example 1
3 clusters: invisible columns used as output variables: Example 2 Description: Data Sonogram Sound examples for synthetic datasets and the Iris dataset Duration: about 5 s ##### 8.2 Particle Trajectory Sonification Model This sonification model explores features of a data distribution by computing the trajectories of test particles which are injected into model space and move according to Newton's laws of motion in a potential given by the dataset. * Sound example: page 93, PTSM-Ex-1 Audification of 1 particle in the potential of phi(x). * Sound example: page 93, PTSM-Ex-2 Audification of a sequence of 15 particles in the potential of a dataset with 2 clusters. * Sound example: page 94, PTSM-Ex-3 Audification of 25 particles simultaneous in a potential of a dataset with 2 clusters. * Sound example: page 94, PTSM-Ex-4 Audification of 25 particles simultaneous in a potential of a dataset with 1 cluster. * Sound example: page 95, PTSM-Ex-5 sigma-step sequence for a mixture of three Gaussian clusters * Sound example: page 95, PTSM-Ex-6 sigma-step sequence for a Gaussian cluster * Sound example: page 96, PTSM-Iris-1 Sonification for the Iris Dataset with 20 particles per step. * Sound example: page 96, PTSM-Iris-2 Sonification for the Iris Dataset with 3 particles per step. * Sound example: page 96, PTSM-Tetra-1 Sonification for a 4d tetrahedron clusters dataset. ##### 8.3 Markov chain Monte Carlo Sonification The McMC Sonification Model defines a exploratory process in the domain of a given density p such that the acoustic representation summarizes features of p, particularly concerning the modes of p by sound. * Sound Example: page 105, MCMC-Ex-1 McMC Sonification, stabilization of amplitudes. * Sound Example: page 106, MCMC-Ex-2 Trajectory Audification for 100 McMC steps in 3 cluster dataset * McMC Sonification for Cluster Analysis, dataset with three clusters, page 107 * Stream 1 MCMC-Ex-3.1 * Stream 2 MCMC-Ex-3.2 * Stream 3 MCMC-Ex-3.3 * Mix MCMC-Ex-3.4 * McMC Sonification for Cluster Analysis, dataset with three clusters, T =0.002s, page 107 * Stream 1 MCMC-Ex-4.1 (stream 1) * Stream 2 MCMC-Ex-4.2 (stream 2) * Stream 3 MCMC-Ex-4.3 (stream 3) * Mix MCMC-Ex-4.4 * McMC Sonification for Cluster Analysis, density with 6 modes, T=0.008s, page 107 * Stream 1 MCMC-Ex-5.1 (stream 1) * Stream 2 MCMC-Ex-5.2 (stream 2) * Stream 3 MCMC-Ex-5.3 (stream 3) * Mix MCMC-Ex-5.4 * McMC Sonification for the Iris dataset, page 108 * MCMC-Ex-6.1 * MCMC-Ex-6.2 * MCMC-Ex-6.3 * MCMC-Ex-6.4 * MCMC-Ex-6.5 * MCMC-Ex-6.6 * MCMC-Ex-6.7 * MCMC-Ex-6.8 ##### 8.4 Principal Curve Sonification Principal Curve Sonification represents data by synthesizing the soundscape while a virtual listener moves along the principal curve of the dataset through the model space. * Noisy Spiral dataset, PCS-Ex-1.1 , page 113 * Noisy Spiral dataset with variance modulation PCS-Ex-1.2 , page 114 * 9d tetrahedron cluster dataset (10 clusters) PCS-Ex-2 , page 114 * Iris dataset, class label used as pitch of auditory grains PCS-Ex-3 , page 114 ##### 8.5 Data Crystallization Sonification Model * Table 8.6, page 122: Sound examples for Crystallization Sonification for 5d Gaussian distribution File: DCS started at center, in tail, from far outside Description: DCS for dataset sampled from N{0, I_5} excited at different locations Duration: 1.4 s * Mixture of 2 Gaussians, page 122 * DCS started at point A DCS-Ex1A * DCS started at point B DCS-Ex1B * Table 8.7, page 124: Sound examples for DCS on variation of the harmonics factor File: h_omega = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Description: DCS for a mixture of two Gaussians with varying harmonics factor Duration: 1.4 s * Table 8.8, page 124: Sound examples for DCS on variation of the energy decay time File: tau_(1/2) = 0.001, 0.005, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2 Description: DCS for a mixture of two Gaussians varying the energy decay time tau_(1/2) Duration: 1.4 s * Table 8.9, page 125: Sound examples for DCS on variation of the sonification time File: T = 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 Description: DCS for a mixture of two Gaussians on varying the duration T Duration: 0.2s -- 8s * Table 8.10, page 125: Sound examples for DCS on variation of model space dimension File: selected columns of the dataset: (x0) (x0,x1) (x0,...,x2) (x0,...,x3) (x0,...,x4) (x0,...,x5) Description: DCS for a mixture of two Gaussians varying the dimension Duration: 1.4 s * Table 8.11, page 126: Sound examples for DCS for different excitation locations File: starting point: C0, C1, C2 Description: DCS for a mixture of three Gaussians in 10d space with different rank(S) = {2,4,8} Duration: 1.9 s * Table 8.12, page 126: Sound examples for DCS for the mixture of a 2d distribution and a 5d cluster File: condensation nucleus in (x0,x1)-plane at: (-6,0)=C1, (-3,0)=C2, ( 0,0)=C0 Description: DCS for a mixture of a uniform 2d and a 5d Gaussian Duration: 2.16 s * Table 8.13, page 127: Sound examples for DCS for the cancer dataset File: condensation nucleus in (x0,x1)-plane at: benign 1, benign 2
malignant 1, malignant 2 Description: DCS for a mixture of a uniform 2d and a 5d Gaussian Duration: 2.16 s ##### 8.6 Growing Neural Gas Sonification * Table 8.14, page 133: Sound examples for GNGS Probing File: Cluster C0 (2d): a, b, c
Cluster C1 (4d): a, b, c
Cluster C2 (8d): a, b, c Description: GNGS for a mixture of 3 Gaussians in 10d space Duration: 1 s * Table 8.15, page 134: Sound examples for GNGS for the noisy spiral dataset File: (a) GNG with 3 neurons 1, 2
(b) GNG with 20 neurons end, middle, inner end
(c) GNG with 45 neurons outer end, middle, close to inner end, at inner end
(d) GNG with 150 neurons outer end, in the middle, inner end
(e) GNG with 20 neurons outer end, in the middle, inner end
(f) GNG with 45 neurons outer end, in the middle, inner end Description: GNG probing sonification for 2d noisy spiral dataset Duration: 1 s * Table 8.16, page 136: Sound examples for GNG Process Monitoring Sonification for different data distributions File: Noisy spiral with 1 rotation: sound
Noisy spiral with 2 rotations: sound
Gaussian in 5d: sound
Mixture of 5d and 2d distributions: sound Description: GNG process sonification examples Duration: 5 s #### Chapter 9: Extensions #### In this chapter, two extensions for Parameter Mapping

Context GoEmotions is a corpus of 58k carefully curated comments extracted from Reddit, with human annotations to 27 emotion categories or Neutral.

Content Number of examples: 58,009. Number of labels: 27 + Neutral. Maximum sequence length in training and evaluation datasets: 30. On top of the raw data, we also include a version filtered based on reter-agreement, which contains a train/test/validation split:

Size of training dataset: 43,410. Size of test dataset: 5,427. Size of validation dataset: 5,426. The emotion categories are: admiration, amusement, anger, annoyance, approval, caring, confusion, curiosity, desire, disappointment, disapproval, disgust, embarrassment, excitement, fear, gratitude, grief, joy, love, nervousness, optimism, pride, realization, relief, remorse, sadness, surprise.

For more details on the design and content of the dataset, please see our paper. .

Acknowledgements

Inspiration Multi Classification of emotions

License

CC BY-NC-SA

Original Data Source: GoEmotions

This component contains the data and syntax code used to conduct the Exploratory Factor Analysis and compute Velicer’s minimum average partial test in sample 1

This repository contains material related to the analysis performed in the article "Best Practices for Your Exploratory Factor Analysis: Factor Tutorial". The material includes the data used in the analyses in .dat format, the labels (.txt) of the variables used in the Factor software, the outputs (.txt) evaluated in the article, and videos (.mp4 with English subtitles) recorded for the purpose of explaining the article. The videos can also be accessed in the following playlist: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLDfyRtHbxiZ3R-T3H1cY8dusz273aUFVe. Below is a summary of the article:

"Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) is one of the statistical methods most widely used in Administration, however, its current practice coexists with rules of thumb and heuristics given half a century ago. The purpose of this article is to present the best practices and recent recommendations for a typical EFA in Administration through a practical solution accessible to researchers. In this sense, in addition to discussing current practices versus recommended practices, a tutorial with real data on Factor is illustrated, a software that is still little known in the Administration area, but freeware, easy to use (point and click) and powerful. The step-by-step illustrated in the article, in addition to the discussions raised and an additional example, is also available in the format of tutorial videos. Through the proposed didactic methodology (article-tutorial + video-tutorial), we encourage researchers/methodologists who have mastered a particular technique to do the same. Specifically, about EFA, we hope that the presentation of the Factor software, as a first solution, can transcend the current outdated rules of thumb and heuristics, by making best practices accessible to Administration researchers"

The average American’s diet does not align with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA) provided by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2020). The present study aimed to compare fruit and vegetable consumption among those who had and had not heard of the DGA, identify characteristics of DGA users, and identify barriers to DGA use. A nationwide survey of 943 Americans revealed that those who had heard of the DGA ate more fruits and vegetables than those who had not. Men, African Americans, and those who have more education had greater odds of using the DGA as a guide when preparing meals relative to their respective counterparts. Disinterest, effort, and time were among the most cited reasons for not using the DGA. Future research should examine how to increase DGA adherence among those unaware of or who do not use the DGA. Comparative analyses of fruit and vegetable consumption among those who were aware/unaware and use/do not use the DGA were completed using independent samples t tests. Fruit and vegetable consumption variables were log-transformed for analysis. Binary logistic regression was used to examine whether demographic features (race, gender, and age) predict DGA awareness and usage. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 28.1 and SAS/STAT® version 9.4 TS1M7 (2023 SAS Institute Inc).

Iris Petal and Sepal Dataset Description The Iris dataset is one of the most famous datasets in the field of machine learning and statistical classification. It was first introduced by British biologist and statistician Ronald Fisher in 1936 as an example of linear discriminant analysis. The dataset is widely used for educational purposes and model building in machine learning due to its simplicity and versatility.

Dataset Overview The dataset contains 150 observations of Iris flowers from three species:

Iris Setosa Iris Versicolor Iris Virginica Each observation includes four numerical features:

Sepal Length (cm) Sepal Width (cm) Petal Length (cm) Petal Width (cm) Additionally, the dataset provides a class label for the species of the Iris flower.

Feature Descriptions: Sepal Length: The length of the flower’s sepal in centimeters. Sepal Width: The width of the flower’s sepal in centimeters. Petal Length: The length of the flower’s petal in centimeters. Petal Width: The width of the flower’s petal in centimeters. Species: The class label that classifies the flower into one of three species (Setosa, Versicolor, Virginica). Data Summary: 150 instances (50 samples per species) 4 features (numeric data) 1 target variable (categorical – species of the flower) Applications: The dataset is often used for:

Classification tasks: Building models to classify the species of Iris flowers. Exploratory data analysis (EDA): Exploring relationships between features. Data visualization: Plotting petal and sepal dimensions to understand patterns. Predictive modeling: Training and testing machine learning algorithms such as k-nearest neighbors (KNN), support vector machines (SVM), and decision trees. Why This Dataset? The Iris dataset is ideal for beginners and experts alike, as it provides an easy introduction to supervised learning. It is perfect for understanding basic classification algorithms and exploring key concepts such as:

Multiclass classification Feature correlation Data visualization techniques This description is tailored for the Kaggle community and provides a clear overview of the dataset’s content and potential use cases. You can customize it further if needed!

This dataset contains supplementary material for the paper 'Funding Covid-19 research: Insights from an exploratory analysis using open data infrastructures' by Alexis-Michel Mugabushaka, Nees Jan van Eck, and Ludo Waltman.

• supplementary_material_1_dataset.ods: Dataset of Covid-19 publications.
• supplementary_material_2_sample.ods: Samples of publications used to assess the accuracy of funding data in the different databases.
• supplementary_material_3_tables_and_figures.ods: Statistics underlying the tables and figures presented in the paper.

The Social Media Sentiments Analysis Dataset captures a vibrant tapestry of emotions, trends, and interactions across various social media platforms. This dataset provides a snapshot of user-generated content, encompassing text, timestamps, hashtags, countries, likes, and retweets. Each entry unveils unique stories—moments of surprise, excitement, admiration, thrill, contentment, and more—shared by individuals worldwide.

Key Features

Feature Description Text User-generated content showcasing sentiments Sentiment Categorized emotions Timestamp Date and time information User Unique identifiers of users contributing Platform Social media platform where the content originated Hashtags Identifies trending topics and themes Likes Quantifies user engagement (likes) Retweets Reflects content popularity (retweets) Country Geographical origin of each post Year Year of the post Month Month of the post Day Day of the post Hour Hour of the post How to Use The Social Media Sentiments Analysis Dataset 📊

The Social Media Sentiments Analysis Dataset is a rich source of information that can be leveraged for various analytical purposes. Below are key ways to make the most of this dataset:

Sentiment Analysis:

Explore the emotional landscape by conducting sentiment analysis on the "Text" column. Classify user-generated content into categories such as surprise, excitement, admiration, thrill, contentment, and more.

Temporal Analysis:

Investigate trends over time using the "Timestamp" column. Identify patterns, fluctuations, or recurring themes in social media content.

User Behavior Insights:

Analyze user engagement through the "Likes" and "Retweets" columns. Discover popular content and user preferences.

Platform-Specific Analysis:

Examine variations in content across different social media platforms using the "Platform" column. Understand how sentiments vary across platforms.

Hashtag Trends:

Identify trending topics and themes by analyzing the "Hashtags" column. Uncover popular or recurring hashtags.

Geographical Analysis:

Explore content distribution based on the "Country" column. Understand regional variations in sentiment and topic preferences.

User Identification:

Use the "User" column to track specific users and their contributions. Analyze the impact of influential users on sentiment trends.

Cross-Analysis:

Combine multiple features for in-depth insights. For example, analyze sentiment trends over time or across different platforms and countries.

Original Data Source: Social Media Sentiments Analysis Dataset 📊

Extant scholarship has until now relied on informal-theoretic, case study, and interpretative methods to assess patterns of norm development in cyberspace. Ideally, these accounts would be complemented with more systematic crossnational and longitudinal empirical evidence. To address this gap, this article introduces the International Cyber Expression (ICE) Dataset. The dataset includes a corpus of more than 35,000 official expressions of view by state actors regarding the international politics of cyberspace. The article describes the sources of this data and demonstrates the dataset’s usefulness, with an appendix containing an exploratory analysis of norm convergence. Future research can leverage the dataset to empirically test questions of theory and policy. For example, the dataset can be used to study how foundational theories of norm diffusion apply to cyberspace. It can also be paired with existing cyber conflict datasets to study the conditions under which state practice influences cyber discourse, and vice versa. (Please cite the original publication: Canfil, Justin Key (2024). Until consensus: Introducing the International Cyber Expression dataset. Journal of Peace Research, 61(1), 150-159. https://doi.org/10.1177/00223433231217656)

Supplementary materials for the article: De Winter, J. C. F., Dodou, D., & Wieringa, P. A. (2009). Exploratory factor analysis with small sample sizes. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44, 147–181.

Context

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) time series listing confirmed cases, reported deaths and reported recoveries. Data is disaggregated by country (and sometimes subregion). Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is caused by the Severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and has had a worldwide effect. On March 11 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared it a pandemic, pointing to the over 118,000 cases of the Coronavirus illness in over 110 countries and territories around the world at the time.

This dataset includes time series data tracking the number of people affected by COVID-19 worldwide, including:

confirmed tested cases of Coronavirus infection the number of people who have reportedly died while sick with Coronavirus the number of people who have reportedly recovered from it

Content

Data is in CSV format and updated daily. It is sourced from this upstream repository maintained by the amazing team at Johns Hopkins University Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) who have been doing a great public service from an early point by collating data from around the world.

We have cleaned and normalized that data, for example tidying dates and consolidating several files into normalized time series. We have also added some metadata such as column descriptions and data packaged it.

Sample 1 was used for Exploratory Factor Analysis, Sample 2 was used for Confirmatory Factor Analysis.

StructDataLite contains 100,000 samples and serves as a compact resource for initial training, debugging, and exploratory analysis. It balances coverage of geometric configurations and boundary conditions.

StructDataHeavy contains 2,000,000 samples, designed for high-fidelity model training. This dataset provides extensive variability across structural configurations and load cases, ensuring realistic and robust training scenarios.

Both lite and meta datasets include features such as roller positions, force locations and magnitudes, beam node coordinates, and derived physics outputs containing deflections, rotations, shear and moments, supporting potential for advanced structural analysis and optimization.

The risk of exploiting information security vulnerabilities should not be determined solely by a single metric, such as the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS). This approach disregards the global threat landscape and the vulnerable asset. Therefore, in addition to using traditional Vulnerability Management (VM) tools, analysts and researchers must manually curate datasets containing threat intelligence and context-specific information about security flaws. However, this activity is non-trivial and error-prone. To aid this endeavor, we developed a fully automated tool capable of gathering data about the intrinsic characteristics of vulnerabilities available in the National Vulnerability Database (NVD) and augmented it with information collected from multiple security feeds and social networks. Altogether, we collected data on more than 200,000 vulnerabilities that can be used for various research topics, e.g., analyzing the risk of exploiting security flaws, vulnerability severity prediction, etc. In this paper, we present a detailed description of the methodology used to create our dataset with its attributes. Additionally, we perform an exploratory analysis of the data gathered, and finally, we present an illustrative example of how analysts could use the data collected. The CVEjoin dataset and the scripts used for its construction are publicly available on GitHub.

read-tv

The main paper is about, read-tv, open-source software for longitudinal data visualization. We uploaded sample use case surgical flow disruption data to highlight read-tv's capabilities. We scrubbed the data of protected health information, and uploaded it as a single CSV file. A description of the original data is described below.

Data source

Surgical workflow disruptions, defined as “deviations from the natural progression of an operation thereby potentially compromising the efficiency or safety of care”, provide a window on the systems of work through which it is possible to analyze mismatches between the work demands and the ability of the people to deliver the work. They have been shown to be sensitive to different intraoperative technologies, surgical errors, surgical experience, room layout, checklist implementation and the effectiveness of the supporting team. The significance of flow disruptions lies in their ability to provide a hitherto unavailable perspective on the quality and efficiency of the system. This allows for a systematic, quantitative and replicable assessment of risks in surgical systems, evaluation of interventions to address them, and assessment of the role that technology plays in exacerbation or mitigation.

In 2014, Drs Catchpole and Anger were awarded NIBIB R03 EB017447 to investigate flow disruptions in Robotic Surgery which has resulted in the detailed, multi-level analysis of over 4,000 flow disruptions. Direct observation of 89 RAS (robitic assisted surgery) cases, found a mean of 9.62 flow disruptions per hour, which varies across different surgical phases, predominantly caused by coordination, communication, equipment, and training problems.

Methods This section does not describe the methods of read-tv software development, which can be found in the associated manuscript from JAMIA Open (JAMIO-2020-0121.R1). This section describes the methods involved in the surgical work flow disruption data collection. A curated, PHI-free (protected health information) version of this dataset was used as a use case for this manuscript.

Observer training

Trained human factors researchers conducted each observation following the completion of observer training. The researchers were two full-time research assistants based in the department of surgery at site 3 who visited the other two sites to collect data. Human Factors experts guided and trained each observer in the identification and standardized collection of FDs. The observers were also trained in the basic components of robotic surgery in order to be able to tangibly isolate and describe such disruptive events.

Comprehensive observer training was ensured with both classroom and floor training. Observers were required to review relevant literature, understand general practice guidelines for observing in the OR (e.g., where to stand, what to avoid, who to speak to), and conduct practice observations. The practice observations were broken down into three phases, all performed under the direct supervision of an experienced observer. During phase one, the trainees oriented themselves to the real-time events of both the OR and the general steps in RAS. The trainee was also introduced to the OR staff and any other involved key personnel. During phase two, the trainer and trainee observed three RAS procedures together to practice collecting FDs and become familiar with the data collection tool. Phase three was dedicated to determining inter-rater reliability by having the trainer and trainee simultaneously, yet independently, conduct observations for at least three full RAS procedures. Observers were considered fully trained if, after three full case observations, intra-class correlation coefficients (based on number of observed disruptions per phase) were greater than 0.80, indicating good reliability.

Data collection

Following the completion of training, observers individually conducted observations in the OR. All relevant RAS cases were pre-identified on a monthly basis by scanning the surgical schedule and recording a list of procedures. All procedures observed were conducted with the Da Vinci Xi surgical robot, with the exception of one procedure at Site 2, which was performed with the Si robot. Observers attended those cases that fit within their allotted work hours and schedule. Observers used Microsoft Surface Pro tablets configured with a customized data collection tool developed using Microsoft Excel to collect data. The data collection tool divided procedures into five phases, as opposed to the four phases previously used in similar research, to more clearly distinguish between task demands throughout the procedure. Phases consisted of phase 1 - patient in the room to insufflation, phase 2 -insufflation to surgeon on console (including docking), phase 3 - surgeon on console to surgeon off console, phase 4 - surgeon off console to patient closure, and phase 5 - patient closure to patient leaves the operating room. During each procedure, FDs were recorded into the appropriate phase, and a narrative, time-stamp, and classification (based off of a robot-specific FD taxonomy) were also recorded.

Each FD was categorized into one of ten categories: communication, coordination, environment, equipment, external factors, other, patient factors, surgical task considerations, training, or unsure. The categorization system is modeled after previous studies, as well as the examples provided for each FD category.

Once in the OR, observers remained as unobtrusive as possible. They stood at an appropriate vantage point in the room without getting in the way of team members. Once an appropriate time presented itself, observers introduced themselves to the circulating nurse and informed them of the reason for their presence. Observers did not directly engage in conversations with operating room staff, however, if a staff member approached them with any questions/comments they would respond.

Data Reduction and PHI (Protected Health Information) Removal

This dataset uses 41 of the aforementioned surgeries. All columns have been removed except disruption type, a numeric timestamp for number of minutes into the day, and surgical phase. In addition, each surgical case had it's initial disruption set to 12 noon, (720 minutes).

Brazilian E-Commerce Public Dataset by Olist Welcome! This is a Brazilian ecommerce public dataset of orders made at Olist Store. The dataset has information of 100k orders from 2016 to 2018 made at multiple marketplaces in Brazil. Its features allows viewing an order from multiple dimensions: from order status, price, payment and freight performance to customer location, product attributes and finally reviews written by customers. We also released a geolocation dataset that relates Brazilian zip codes to lat/lng coordinates.

This is real commercial data, it has been anonymised, and references to the companies and partners in the review text have been replaced with the names of Game of Thrones great houses.

Join it With the Marketing Funnel by Olist We have also released a Marketing Funnel Dataset. You may join both datasets and see an order from Marketing perspective now!

Instructions on joining are available on this Kernel.

Context This dataset was generously provided by Olist, the largest department store in Brazilian marketplaces. Olist connects small businesses from all over Brazil to channels without hassle and with a single contract. Those merchants are able to sell their products through the Olist Store and ship them directly to the customers using Olist logistics partners. See more on our website: www.olist.com

After a customer purchases the product from Olist Store a seller gets notified to fulfill that order. Once the customer receives the product, or the estimated delivery date is due, the customer gets a satisfaction survey by email where he can give a note for the purchase experience and write down some comments.

Attention An order might have multiple items. Each item might be fulfilled by a distinct seller. All text identifying stores and partners where replaced by the names of Game of Thrones great houses. Example of a product listing on a marketplace Example of a product listing on a marketplace

Data Schema The data is divided in multiple datasets for better understanding and organization. Please refer to the following data schema when working with it: Data Schema

Classified Dataset We had previously released a classified dataset, but we removed it at Version 6. We intend to release it again as a new dataset with a new data schema. While we don't finish it, you may use the classified dataset available at the Version 5 or previous.

Inspiration Here are some inspiration for possible outcomes from this dataset.

NLP:

This dataset offers a supreme environment to parse out the reviews text through its multiple dimensions.

Clustering:

Some customers didn't write a review. But why are they happy or mad?

Sales Prediction:

With purchase date information you'll be able to predict future sales.

Delivery Performance:

You will also be able to work through delivery performance and find ways to optimize delivery times.

Product Quality:

Enjoy yourself discovering the products categories that are more prone to customer insatisfaction.

Feature Engineering:

Create features from this rich dataset or attach some external public information to it.

Acknowledgements Thanks to Olist for releasing this dataset.

Original Data Source: Brazilian E-Commerce Public Dataset by Olist

This folder contains the files used in the ASL analyses of my study: All of the data and calculations for my primary analysis, my exploratory analyses (except the one using a video from The Daily Moth, which can be found in a separate folder), and the ASL portions of my secondary analysis. As described in my dissertation, I am not sharing the original video files in order to protect the privacy of those who participated in my study.Each file is shared in one or more of the formats listed below, as appropriate:PDF.csv files (one file for each sheet)Link to my Google Sheets file