The state of Utah experienced the most significant GDP growth in 2024, growing by seven percent from 2023. Florida, South Carolina, and North Carolina also experienced high amounts of growth in the same period. North Dakota was the only state that saw a decrease in GDP, falling 0.8 percent.

The state of North Dakota experienced the most significant growth in real GDP in 2023, growing 7.8 percent when compared to 2022. Texas and Oklahoma also experienced growth at or more than seven percent.

This statistic shows the 20 countries with the highest growth of the gross domestic product (GDP) in 2024. In 2043, Guyana ranked 1st with an estimated GDP growth of approximately 43.57 percent compared to the previous year. GDP around the world Gross domestic product (GDP) is an indicator of the monetary value of all goods and services produced by a nation in a specific time period. GDP is a strong index of a country’s economic strength - the higher the GDP of a nation, the stronger that country’s economy. The countries in the world with the highest GDP or GDP per capita are mainly developed and emerging countries, with global gross domestic product amounting to nearly 75 trillion U.S. dollars. As of 2016, the United States is the nation in the world with the highest GDP with more than 18.56 trillion U.S. dollars, which makes up more than 15.7 percent of the global GDP. The countries with the lowest gross domestic product per capita in 2014 were mainly African nations. The country in the world with the lowest GDP per capita in 2016 was South Sudan, followed by Malawi, and Burundi. However, several economically struggling African and Asian countries such as Myanmar, Côte d'Ivoire, Bhutan, and India reported the highest growth of the gross domestic product in 2016. Also in the top 20 nations with the highest growth of the GDP is China. In 2016, the GDP in China was the second highest GDP in the world. It is estimated that by 2019 the GDP in China will grow by 6 percent. Based on this estimate, GDP in China will be at around 14.6 trillion U.S. dollars by 2019.

The Covid-19 pandemic saw growth fall by 2.2 percent, compared with an increase of 2.5 percent the year before. The last time the real GDP growth rates fell by a similar level was during the Great Recession in 2009, and the only other time since the Second World War where real GDP fell by more than one percent was in the early 1980s recession. The given records began following the Wall Street Crash in 1929, and GDP growth fluctuated greatly between the Great Depression and the 1950s, before growth became more consistent.

Out of all 50 states, New York had the highest per-capita real gross domestic product (GDP) in 2024, at 92,341 U.S. dollars, followed closely by Massachusetts. Mississippi had the lowest per-capita real GDP, at 41,603 U.S. dollars. While not a state, the District of Columbia had a per capita GDP of more than 210,780 U.S. dollars. What is real GDP? A country’s real GDP is a measure that shows the value of the goods and services produced by an economy and is adjusted for inflation. The real GDP of a country helps economists to see the health of a country’s economy and its standard of living. Downturns in GDP growth can indicate financial difficulties, such as the financial crisis of 2008 and 2009, when the U.S. GDP decreased by 2.5 percent. The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on U.S. GDP, shrinking the economy 2.8 percent. The U.S. economy rebounded in 2021, however, growing by nearly six percent. Why real GDP per capita matters Real GDP per capita takes the GDP of a country, state, or metropolitan area and divides it by the number of people in that area. Some argue that per-capita GDP is more important than the GDP of a country, as it is a good indicator of whether or not the country’s population is getting wealthier, thus increasing the standard of living in that area. The best measure of standard of living when comparing across countries is thought to be GDP per capita at purchasing power parity (PPP) which uses the prices of specific goods to compare the absolute purchasing power of a countries currency.

This dataset provides values for GDP ANNUAL GROWTH RATE reported in several countries. The data includes current values, previous releases, historical highs and record lows, release frequency, reported unit and currency.

Graph and download economic data for Real Gross Domestic Product: All Industry Total in South Carolina (SCRGSP) from 1997 to 2024 about SC, GSP, real, industry, GDP, and USA.

In 2023 the real gross domestic product (GDP) of the United States increased by 2.5 percent compared to 2022. This rate of annual growth indicates a return to economy normalcy after 2020 saw a dramatic decline in the GDP growth rate due to the the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, and high growth in 2021.

What does GDP growth mean?

Essentially, the annual GDP of the U.S. is the monetary value of all goods and services produced within the country over a given year. On the surface, an increase in GDP therefore means that more goods and services have been produced between one period than another. In the case of annualized GDP, it is compared to the previous year. In 2023, for example, the U.S. GDP grew 2.5 percent compared to 2022.

Countries with highest GDP growth rate

Although the United States has by far the largest GDP of any country, it does not have the highest GDP growth, nor the highest GDP at purchasing power parity. In 2021, Libya had the highest growth in GDP, growing more than 177 percent compared to 2020. Furthermore, Luxembourg had the highest GDP per capita at purchasing power parity, a better measure of living standards than nominal or real GDP.

The U.S. manufacturing sector plays a central role in the economy, accounting for 20% of U.S. capital investment, 60% of the nation's exports and 70% of business R&D. Overall, the sector's market size, measured in terms of revenue is worth roughly $6 trillion, making it a major industry to do business with. So which U.S. states are the biggest for manufacturing? This article will explore the nation's top manufacturing states, measured by number of employees, based on MNI's database of 400,000 U.S. manufacturing companies.

Graph and download economic data for Total Gross Domestic Product for Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX (MSA) (NGMP26420) from 2001 to 2023 about Houston, TX, industry, GDP, and USA.

This statistic shows the ten countries with the fastest growing economies in the world from 2001 to 2010. Over the past decade, Angola has demonstrated the fastest economic growth rate with average annual GDP growth sitting as high as 11.1 percent. The overall quarterly GDP growth in the United States can be found here.

Entrepreneurship Number of companies appearing in the annual Inc. 5000 list of Fastest Growing Companies in America (top states by number of companies in 2020)

The fastest growing economy in Europe in 2024 was Malta. The small Mediterranean country's gross domestic product grew at five percent in 2024, beating out Montenegro which had a growth rate of almost four percent and the Russian Federation which had a rate of 3.6 percent in the same year. Estonia was the country with the largest negative growth in 2024, as the Baltic country's economy shrank by 0.88 percent compared with 2023, largely as a result of the country's exposure to the economic effects of Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the subsequent economic sanctions placed on Russia. Germany, Europe's largest economy, experience economic stagnation with a growth of 0.1 percent. Overall, the EU (which contains 27 European countries) registered a growth rate of one percent and the Eurozone (which contains 20) grew by 0.8 percent.

United States (DC)Nonfarm Business: Temporarily Faster Growth data was reported at 102.750 1992=100 in 2023. This stayed constant from the previous number of 102.750 1992=100 for 2022. United States (DC)Nonfarm Business: Temporarily Faster Growth data is updated yearly, averaging 100.000 1992=100 from Dec 1949 (Median) to 2023, with 75 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 102.750 1992=100 in 2023 and a record low of 100.000 1992=100 in 2000. United States (DC)Nonfarm Business: Temporarily Faster Growth data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Congressional Budget Office. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.A130: NIPA 2018: Potential Gross Domestic Product: Projection.

United States relations with China are critically important for the future of world politics. They are also a useful case in which to test the individual-level implications of the liberal commercial peace argument. A plausible case can be made on both side s of the claim that China poses a security threat to the United States. China's economy is growing far faster than the United States' economy, while the country remains a communist autocracy. At the same time, trade between the U.S. and China has expanded dramatically in the last three decades. Its dual role as a major trading partner and a growing international rival generates substantial uncertainty about China's future status as friend or foe. Using data from a recent survey by the Chicago Council on Foreign Relations (CCFR), we find that economic interests help explain individual Americans' assessment of China as a threat and their views concerning hostile policies toward that country. Those who stand to benefit from trade with China hold more positive views of the country and oppose conflictual foreign policies with respect to it. Those whose incomes are likely to decline because of trade with China tend to take the opposite position on these questions.

Economic surplus model results: Change in economy-wide income in 2030 from faster productivity growth, as modeled by the IMPACT model, by subregion in Sub-Saharan Africa.

The statistic shows the growth in real GDP in Brazil from between 2020 and 2024, with projections up until 2030. In 2024, Brazil’s real gross domestic product increased by 3.4 percent compared to the previous year.Brazilian growth and civic unrestGDP is a reliable tool used to indicate the shape of a national economy. It is one of the most well-known and well-understood measurements of the state of a country. Gross domestic product, or GDP, is the total market value of all final services and goods that have been produced in a country within a given period of time, usually a year.Brazil has undergone a huge economic transformation in the course of the last decade and is now one of the fastest growing economies on the planet. It belongs to the BRIC club of countries, an acronym that refers to the countries Brazil, Russia, India and China, a group of countries which are considered to be at a relatively similar stage of new and advancing economic development. Economic reforms in Brazil have given the country a boost on the international stage, which has helped it to gain significantly in recognition and influence around the world.The domestic product growth rate in Brazil is progressing throughout the years. After a minor blip in 2009, when a short recession saw the rate of growth moving slightly backwards, the economy has picked itself up and fought back with an increase of an impressive 7.53 percent in 2010. Despite the rapid growth and the perceived increase in Brazilian domestic prosperity, the gap between rich and poor remains distinct. The lower class manifested themselves in the numerous protests that erupted across the South American state in the summer of 2013. For days, hundreds of thousands of Brazilians took to the streets to protest the increase of public transport fares, but the demonstrations evolved into a more general protest against increasing social inequalities among the Brazilian population, despite increased prosperity.

BackgroundThe care economy gained its prominence during the COVID-19 pandemic. The value and impact of caregiving, mostly shouldered by women, was not as visible until such crisis point. Health care and social support sectors represent the largest and fastest growing industry globally. This scoping review aims to elucidate the current state of play in the care economy, where there is a great reliance on informal and formal care workforce to deliver care for populations across all age groups and abilities.MethodsFollowing Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology and PRISMA-SCR reporting guidance, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Campbell collaboration database, Social Science Abstracts, Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA) and Scopus. Quantitative and qualitative original research on disability, aged care, early childhood education and care, rural, veterans, migrants and informal and formal care workforce from January 2018 until November 2023 were examined.ResultsOf 354 studies selected, 20% were from the United States of America, 11% each were from China and the United Kingdom. Most studies employed cross-sectional design. A quarter of the studies included adults aged 65 years and above while 6% were adults aged 18 to 64 years. These age groups combined were included in an additional 27% of studies. Women were overrepresented in 70% of the studies. Nearly two-thirds of caregivers were spouses or partners. Barriers to providing care were lack of education, support and monitoring of caregiver well-being, loss of income or ability to earn money, reduced social life and increased out-of-pocket costs. Gaps in research included migrant populations’ contribution to the care economy, gender and diversity inequality in the care economy. The care economy could be improved through providing education for caregivers, care workforce engaging with caregivers in the care plan, and governments’ overhaul of compensation for caregivers through direct financial support and employment benefits.ConclusionThe care economy is an emerging research area. There continues to be a paucity of research evidence across some geographical areas. Studies are mostly short term or small scale with very little evidence around the value of care. Given the growing aging population, more research is needed to elucidate the positive aspects of caring by formal and informal care workforce to the population, society and economy.Protocol registrationThe protocol is registered with Open Science Framework (10.17605). “Definitions, key themes and aspects of the care economy-a scoping review protocol,” https://osf.io/ypmuh.

Circular Economy in Buildings Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the global market size for the Circular Economy in Buildings reached USD 89.6 billion in 2024, with a robust compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 13.1% from 2025 to 2033. By 2033, the market is forecasted to reach an impressive USD 264.7 billion. This growth is primarily driven by escalating environmental regulations, increasing demand for sustainable construction practices, and a global emphasis on resource efficiency and waste reduction within the built environment.

One of the most significant growth factors propelling the Circular Economy in Buildings market is the intensifying focus on sustainable development goals (SDGs) and climate change mitigation. Governments and regulatory bodies worldwide are implementing stringent policies to minimize construction and demolition waste, promote material reuse, and encourage energy-efficient building practices. These policies are compelling industry stakeholders to adopt circular economy principles, such as designing for disassembly, prioritizing renewable and recycled materials, and extending building lifecycles through renovation and adaptive reuse. As a result, both public and private sector investments in circular building solutions are surging, driving market expansion across all segments.

Technological advancements are another pivotal driver of growth in the Circular Economy in Buildings market. Innovations in digital design tools, building information modeling (BIM), advanced material recovery technologies, and modular construction methods are enabling more efficient resource management throughout the building lifecycle. These technologies facilitate the tracking and optimization of material flows, enhance the feasibility of deconstruction and material recovery, and lower the overall environmental impact of buildings. Additionally, the growing adoption of smart building technologies and IoT-based asset management systems is supporting the integration of circular strategies in both new and existing structures, further accelerating market growth.

Market growth is also being fueled by shifting consumer and investor preferences toward green buildings and sustainable real estate. Institutional investors, corporate tenants, and individual homeowners are increasingly prioritizing properties that demonstrate environmental responsibility and resource efficiency. This trend is leading to a surge in demand for circular building solutions, particularly in urban centers where resource constraints and waste management challenges are most acute. Furthermore, the economic benefits of circular practices—such as reduced material costs, increased asset value, and lower lifecycle operating expenses—are becoming more widely recognized, incentivizing broader adoption across the construction value chain.

From a regional perspective, Europe currently leads the Circular Economy in Buildings market, driven by progressive regulatory frameworks, ambitious circular economy action plans, and a mature green building ecosystem. North America follows closely, with strong growth in both the United States and Canada, fueled by federal and state-level sustainability mandates and a rapidly evolving green construction sector. The Asia Pacific region is emerging as the fastest-growing market, owing to rapid urbanization, rising environmental awareness, and significant investments in sustainable infrastructure. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are also witnessing increased activity, particularly in major urban centers, as governments and developers seek to address waste management and resource scarcity challenges through circular building initiatives.

Solution Analysis

The Solution segment of the Circular Economy in Buildings market encompasses a diverse array of activities, including design, construction, demolition, renovation, material recovery, and other associated services. Design solutions are at the forefront of the circular transition, focusing on creating buildings that are adaptable, easily disassembled, and constructed using sustainable materials. These solutions leverage digital design tools and BIM to optimize resource use, minimize waste, and facilitate future material recovery. The growing emphasis on designing for circularity is fostering close collaboration between architects, engineers, and material suppliers, ensuring that sustainability considerations are embedded from the earliest stages of a project.<br

BackgroundPublic health expenditure is one of the fastest-growing spending items in EU member states. As the population ages and wealth increases, governments allocate more resources to their health systems. In view of this, the aim of this study is to identify the key determinants of public health expenditure in the EU member states.MethodsThis study is based on macro-level EU panel data covering the period from 2000 to 2018. The association between explanatory variables and public health expenditure is analyzed by applying both static and dynamic econometric modeling.ResultsAlthough GDP and out-of-pocket health expenditure are identified as the key drivers of public health expenditure, there are other variables, such as health system characteristics, with a statistically significant association with expenditure. Other variables, such as election year and the level of public debt, result to exert only a modest influence on the level of public health expenditure. Results also indicate that the aging of the population, political ideologies of governments and citizens’ expectations, appear to be statistically insignificant.ConclusionSince increases in public health expenditure in EU member states are mainly triggered by GDP increases, it is expected that differences in PHE per capita across member states will persist and, consequently, making it more difficult to attain the health equity sustainable development goal. Thus, measures to reduce EU economic inequalities, will ultimately result in reducing disparities in public health expenditures across member states.