The state of Utah experienced the most significant GDP growth in 2024, growing by seven percent from 2023. Florida, South Carolina, and North Carolina also experienced high amounts of growth in the same period. North Dakota was the only state that saw a decrease in GDP, falling 0.8 percent.

The state of North Dakota experienced the most significant growth in real GDP in 2023, growing 7.8 percent when compared to 2022. Texas and Oklahoma also experienced growth at or more than seven percent.

This statistic shows the 20 countries with the highest growth of the gross domestic product (GDP) in 2024. In 2043, Guyana ranked 1st with an estimated GDP growth of approximately 43.57 percent compared to the previous year. GDP around the world Gross domestic product (GDP) is an indicator of the monetary value of all goods and services produced by a nation in a specific time period. GDP is a strong index of a country’s economic strength - the higher the GDP of a nation, the stronger that country’s economy. The countries in the world with the highest GDP or GDP per capita are mainly developed and emerging countries, with global gross domestic product amounting to nearly 75 trillion U.S. dollars. As of 2016, the United States is the nation in the world with the highest GDP with more than 18.56 trillion U.S. dollars, which makes up more than 15.7 percent of the global GDP. The countries with the lowest gross domestic product per capita in 2014 were mainly African nations. The country in the world with the lowest GDP per capita in 2016 was South Sudan, followed by Malawi, and Burundi. However, several economically struggling African and Asian countries such as Myanmar, Côte d'Ivoire, Bhutan, and India reported the highest growth of the gross domestic product in 2016. Also in the top 20 nations with the highest growth of the GDP is China. In 2016, the GDP in China was the second highest GDP in the world. It is estimated that by 2019 the GDP in China will grow by 6 percent. Based on this estimate, GDP in China will be at around 14.6 trillion U.S. dollars by 2019.

In 2024 the real gross domestic product (GDP) of the United States increased by 2.8 percent compared to 2023.
What does GDP growth mean? Essentially, the annual GDP of the U.S. is the monetary value of all goods and services produced within the country over a given year. On the surface, an increase in GDP therefore means that more goods and services have been produced between one period than another. In the case of annualized GDP, it is compared to the previous year. In 2023, for example, the U.S. GDP grew 2.5 percent compared to 2022. Countries with highest GDP growth rate Although the United States has by far the largest GDP of any country, it does not have the highest GDP growth, nor the highest GDP at purchasing power parity. In 2021, Libya had the highest growth in GDP, growing more than 177 percent compared to 2020. Furthermore, Luxembourg had the highest GDP per capita at purchasing power parity, a better measure of living standards than nominal or real GDP.

Out of all 50 states, New York had the highest per-capita real gross domestic product (GDP) in 2024, at 92,341 U.S. dollars, followed closely by Massachusetts. Mississippi had the lowest per-capita real GDP, at 41,603 U.S. dollars. While not a state, the District of Columbia had a per capita GDP of more than 210,780 U.S. dollars. What is real GDP? A country’s real GDP is a measure that shows the value of the goods and services produced by an economy and is adjusted for inflation. The real GDP of a country helps economists to see the health of a country’s economy and its standard of living. Downturns in GDP growth can indicate financial difficulties, such as the financial crisis of 2008 and 2009, when the U.S. GDP decreased by 2.5 percent. The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on U.S. GDP, shrinking the economy 2.8 percent. The U.S. economy rebounded in 2021, however, growing by nearly six percent. Why real GDP per capita matters Real GDP per capita takes the GDP of a country, state, or metropolitan area and divides it by the number of people in that area. Some argue that per-capita GDP is more important than the GDP of a country, as it is a good indicator of whether or not the country’s population is getting wealthier, thus increasing the standard of living in that area. The best measure of standard of living when comparing across countries is thought to be GDP per capita at purchasing power parity (PPP) which uses the prices of specific goods to compare the absolute purchasing power of a countries currency.

This dataset provides values for GDP ANNUAL GROWTH RATE reported in several countries. The data includes current values, previous releases, historical highs and record lows, release frequency, reported unit and currency.

Graph and download economic data for Real Gross Domestic Product: All Industry Total in South Carolina (SCRGSP) from 1997 to 2024 about SC, GSP, real, industry, GDP, and USA.

This statistic shows the ten countries with the fastest growing economies in the world from 2001 to 2010. Over the past decade, Angola has demonstrated the fastest economic growth rate with average annual GDP growth sitting as high as 11.1 percent. The overall quarterly GDP growth in the United States can be found here.

The Covid-19 pandemic saw growth fall by 2.2 percent, compared with an increase of 2.5 percent the year before. The last time the real GDP growth rates fell by a similar level was during the Great Recession in 2009, and the only other time since the Second World War where real GDP fell by more than one percent was in the early 1980s recession. The given records began following the Wall Street Crash in 1929, and GDP growth fluctuated greatly between the Great Depression and the 1950s, before growth became more consistent.

The fastest growing economy in Europe in 2024 was Malta. The small Mediterranean country's gross domestic product grew at five percent in 2024, beating out Montenegro which had a growth rate of almost four percent and the Russian Federation which had a rate of 3.6 percent in the same year. Estonia was the country with the largest negative growth in 2024, as the Baltic country's economy shrank by 0.88 percent compared with 2023, largely as a result of the country's exposure to the economic effects of Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the subsequent economic sanctions placed on Russia. Germany, Europe's largest economy, experience economic stagnation with a growth of 0.1 percent. Overall, the EU (which contains 27 European countries) registered a growth rate of one percent and the Eurozone (which contains 20) grew by 0.8 percent.

The U.S. manufacturing sector plays a central role in the economy, accounting for 20% of U.S. capital investment, 60% of the nation's exports and 70% of business R&D. Overall, the sector's market size, measured in terms of revenue is worth roughly $6 trillion, making it a major industry to do business with. So which U.S. states are the biggest for manufacturing? This article will explore the nation's top manufacturing states, measured by number of employees, based on MNI's database of 400,000 U.S. manufacturing companies.

Entrepreneurship Number of companies appearing in the annual Inc. 5000 list of Fastest Growing Companies in America (top states by number of companies in 2020)

This dataset displays the Real GDP by metropolitan area for the years 2001-2005. For each of the posted metropolitan areas Millions of chained dollars and the percentage change from the previous year is posted. This data was geocoded according to city and state locations. During the geocoding process 233/363 records from the original dataset were successfully geocoded. The reason for this is that during the process is that the dataset often groups cities together into one metropolitan area, which were unable to be properly coded. This data was collected from the Bureau of Economic analysis at their web page at: http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/regional/gdp_metro/gdp_metro_newsrelease.htm Access Date: October 29, 2007

Economic surplus model results: Change in economy-wide income in 2030 from faster productivity growth, as modeled by the IMPACT model, by subregion in Sub-Saharan Africa.

United States relations with China are critically important for the future of world politics. They are also a useful case in which to test the individual-level implications of the liberal commercial peace argument. A plausible case can be made on both side s of the claim that China poses a security threat to the United States. China's economy is growing far faster than the United States' economy, while the country remains a communist autocracy. At the same time, trade between the U.S. and China has expanded dramatically in the last three decades. Its dual role as a major trading partner and a growing international rival generates substantial uncertainty about China's future status as friend or foe. Using data from a recent survey by the Chicago Council on Foreign Relations (CCFR), we find that economic interests help explain individual Americans' assessment of China as a threat and their views concerning hostile policies toward that country. Those who stand to benefit from trade with China hold more positive views of the country and oppose conflictual foreign policies with respect to it. Those whose incomes are likely to decline because of trade with China tend to take the opposite position on these questions.

This survey of 2,007 adult residents includes questions from earlier Orange County Annual Surveys. It also includes key indicators from the PPIC Statewide Survey for comparisons with the state and regions of California. It also considers racial/ethnic, income, and political differences. The following issues are explored in this Orange County Survey: county conditions, public policy, and economic and political trends. County conditions include such questions as: What are the most important issues facing the county? How satisfied are residents with their local surroundings, local public services, and with life in Orange County in general? Compared to other regions of the state, how much of a problem are issues such as air pollution, the economy, growth, and housing in Orange County? Online data analysis & additional documentation in Link below. Methods The Orange County Survey a collaborative effort of the Public Policy Institute of California and the School of Social Ecology at the University of California, Irvine is a special edition of the PPIC Statewide Survey.This is the second in an annual series of PPIC surveys of Orange County. Mark Baldassare, the director of the PPIC Statewide Survey, is the founder and director of the Orange County Annual Survey at UCI and a former UCI professor. The UCI survey was conducted 19 times from 1982 to 2000, so the Orange County Survey collaboration between PPIC and UCI that began in 2001 is an extension of earlier survey efforts. The special survey of Orange County is co-sponsored by UCI with local support from Deloitte and Touche, Pacific Life Foundation, Disneyland, Los Angeles Times, Orange County Business Council, Orange County Division of League of California Cities, Orange County Register, The Irvine Company, and United Way of Orange County.Orange County is the second most populous county in the state and one of California's fastest growing and changing regions. The county is home to almost 2.9 million residents today, having gained nearly one million residents since 1980. Three in four residents were white and non-Hispanic in 1980; today, nearly half are Latinos and Asians. The county's dynamic economy has become one of the leaders in the high-technology industry. The county is a bellwether county in politics and the site of many important governance issues, including a county-government bankruptcy, public controversy over the reuse plans for the closed El Toro Marine Corps Air Station, and the use and expansion of toll roads. There are also housing, transportation, and environmental concerns related to development.Public opinion findings are critical to informing discussions and resolving public debates on key issues. The purpose of this study is to inform policymakers by providing timely, accurate, and objective information about policy preferences and economic, social, and political trends.To measure changes over time, this survey of 2,007 adult residents includes questions from earlier Orange County Annual Surveys. It also includes key indicators from the PPIC Statewide Survey for comparisons with the state and regions of California. We also consider racial/ethnic, income, and political differences. The following issues are explored in this Orange County Survey:County Conditions What are the most important issues facing the county? How satisfied are residents with their local surroundings, local public services, and with life in Orange County in general? Compared to other regions of the state, how much of a problem are issues such as air pollution, the economy, growth, and housing in Orange County?Public Policy What types of infrastructure and transportation projects are considered most important for Orange County, and how do local residents feel about taxes and other funding options? How do residents feel about the Great Park plan passed by the voters in March?Economic and Political Trends What are the recent trends in consumer confidence, perceptions of the county's economy, and the county's real estate market? How do county residents rate their personal finances today? How many consider themselves among the have-nots? How do they rate the performance of Governor Davis and President Bush?

The statistic shows the growth in real GDP in Brazil from between 2020 and 2024, with projections up until 2030. In 2024, Brazil’s real gross domestic product increased by 3.4 percent compared to the previous year.Brazilian growth and civic unrestGDP is a reliable tool used to indicate the shape of a national economy. It is one of the most well-known and well-understood measurements of the state of a country. Gross domestic product, or GDP, is the total market value of all final services and goods that have been produced in a country within a given period of time, usually a year.Brazil has undergone a huge economic transformation in the course of the last decade and is now one of the fastest growing economies on the planet. It belongs to the BRIC club of countries, an acronym that refers to the countries Brazil, Russia, India and China, a group of countries which are considered to be at a relatively similar stage of new and advancing economic development. Economic reforms in Brazil have given the country a boost on the international stage, which has helped it to gain significantly in recognition and influence around the world.The domestic product growth rate in Brazil is progressing throughout the years. After a minor blip in 2009, when a short recession saw the rate of growth moving slightly backwards, the economy has picked itself up and fought back with an increase of an impressive 7.53 percent in 2010. Despite the rapid growth and the perceived increase in Brazilian domestic prosperity, the gap between rich and poor remains distinct. The lower class manifested themselves in the numerous protests that erupted across the South American state in the summer of 2013. For days, hundreds of thousands of Brazilians took to the streets to protest the increase of public transport fares, but the demonstrations evolved into a more general protest against increasing social inequalities among the Brazilian population, despite increased prosperity.

Cricket and Field Hockey Equipment Market Outlook

The global market size for cricket and field hockey equipment is projected to grow from USD 2.5 billion in 2023 to USD 4.1 billion by 2032, at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.5%. This growth is driven by an increasing participation in these sports, expanding sports infrastructure, and rising disposable incomes in emerging economies. Additionally, the growing popularity of international and domestic leagues and tournaments has significantly contributed to the surge in demand for high-quality sports equipment.

A significant factor contributing to the growth of the cricket and field hockey equipment market is the increasing global popularity of these sports. Traditionally dominated by countries like India, Australia, and the United Kingdom, cricket has seen a surge in interest from regions such as the United States, the Middle East, and parts of Europe. Similarly, field hockey, which has always been popular in countries like the Netherlands, Germany, and India, is gaining traction in other regions due to increased media exposure and successful marketing campaigns by sports organizations. This expansion in the sports' fanbases directly translates to higher equipment sales, as more people take up these sports recreationally or professionally.

Another crucial growth driver is the ongoing development and modernization of sports infrastructure worldwide. Governments and private entities are investing heavily in building state-of-the-art training facilities, sports complexes, and stadiums. These investments not only provide the necessary platforms for athletes to train and compete but also stimulate the demand for sports equipment. Improved facilities encourage more people to participate in sports, thereby boosting the sales of cricket and field hockey equipment. Additionally, schools and colleges are increasingly incorporating these sports into their physical education programs, further driving the demand for equipment.

Rising disposable incomes and increased spending on leisure activities in emerging economies are also fuelling market growth. Consumers in countries like China, India, and Brazil now have more financial flexibility to spend on sports and recreational activities. This trend is reflected in the growing sales of high-quality, branded sports equipment. Moreover, the influence of social media and the endorsement of sports celebrities play a pivotal role in shaping consumer preferences, leading to increased demand for premium products. As more individuals aspire to emulate their sports idols, the market for cricket and field hockey equipment continues to expand.

The regional outlook for the cricket and field hockey equipment market reveals significant growth potential across various geographies. Asia Pacific remains the largest and fastest-growing market, driven by the immense popularity of cricket in countries like India and Pakistan and the strong field hockey culture in countries like India and Malaysia. North America and Europe are also witnessing steady growth, with increased participation in both sports and rising investments in sports infrastructure. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa regions show promising potential due to their growing interest in these sports and improving economic conditions.

Product Type Analysis

In the cricket and field hockey equipment market, the bats segment holds a significant share, driven by the essential nature of bats in both sports. The demand for high-quality cricket and hockey bats is increasing due to advancements in bat technology and materials. Players are now looking for bats that offer better performance, durability, and comfort. Innovations such as lightweight composite materials and ergonomically designed grips are attracting both professional and amateur players. The trend towards customization, where players can design bats to their specific preferences, is also contributing to the growth of this segment.

Balls are another critical component in the cricket and field hockey equipment market. The quality and type of balls used can significantly impact the outcome of a game. Manufacturers are investing in research and development to produce balls that offer better aerodynamics, durability, and consistent performance. For cricket, innovations include the development of balls with better seam retention and improved swing properties. In field hockey, the focus is on producing balls that offer better visibility and reduced wear and tear. The growing popularity of leagues and tournaments is also driving the demand for high-quality balls.</p&g

Circular Economy in Buildings Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the global market size for the Circular Economy in Buildings reached USD 89.6 billion in 2024, with a robust compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 13.1% from 2025 to 2033. By 2033, the market is forecasted to reach an impressive USD 264.7 billion. This growth is primarily driven by escalating environmental regulations, increasing demand for sustainable construction practices, and a global emphasis on resource efficiency and waste reduction within the built environment.

One of the most significant growth factors propelling the Circular Economy in Buildings market is the intensifying focus on sustainable development goals (SDGs) and climate change mitigation. Governments and regulatory bodies worldwide are implementing stringent policies to minimize construction and demolition waste, promote material reuse, and encourage energy-efficient building practices. These policies are compelling industry stakeholders to adopt circular economy principles, such as designing for disassembly, prioritizing renewable and recycled materials, and extending building lifecycles through renovation and adaptive reuse. As a result, both public and private sector investments in circular building solutions are surging, driving market expansion across all segments.

Technological advancements are another pivotal driver of growth in the Circular Economy in Buildings market. Innovations in digital design tools, building information modeling (BIM), advanced material recovery technologies, and modular construction methods are enabling more efficient resource management throughout the building lifecycle. These technologies facilitate the tracking and optimization of material flows, enhance the feasibility of deconstruction and material recovery, and lower the overall environmental impact of buildings. Additionally, the growing adoption of smart building technologies and IoT-based asset management systems is supporting the integration of circular strategies in both new and existing structures, further accelerating market growth.

Market growth is also being fueled by shifting consumer and investor preferences toward green buildings and sustainable real estate. Institutional investors, corporate tenants, and individual homeowners are increasingly prioritizing properties that demonstrate environmental responsibility and resource efficiency. This trend is leading to a surge in demand for circular building solutions, particularly in urban centers where resource constraints and waste management challenges are most acute. Furthermore, the economic benefits of circular practices—such as reduced material costs, increased asset value, and lower lifecycle operating expenses—are becoming more widely recognized, incentivizing broader adoption across the construction value chain.

From a regional perspective, Europe currently leads the Circular Economy in Buildings market, driven by progressive regulatory frameworks, ambitious circular economy action plans, and a mature green building ecosystem. North America follows closely, with strong growth in both the United States and Canada, fueled by federal and state-level sustainability mandates and a rapidly evolving green construction sector. The Asia Pacific region is emerging as the fastest-growing market, owing to rapid urbanization, rising environmental awareness, and significant investments in sustainable infrastructure. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are also witnessing increased activity, particularly in major urban centers, as governments and developers seek to address waste management and resource scarcity challenges through circular building initiatives.

Solution Analysis

The Solution segment of the Circular Economy in Buildings market encompasses a diverse array of activities, including design, construction, demolition, renovation, material recovery, and other associated services. Design solutions are at the forefront of the circular transition, focusing on creating buildings that are adaptable, easily disassembled, and constructed using sustainable materials. These solutions leverage digital design tools and BIM to optimize resource use, minimize waste, and facilitate future material recovery. The growing emphasis on designing for circularity is fostering close collaboration between architects, engineers, and material suppliers, ensuring that sustainability considerations are embedded from the earliest stages of a project.<br

This dataset explores 2007 State Revenues per Capita and Percentage of Personal Income relinquished in taxes by state for the year 2007. Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census and Bureau of Economic Analysis.