Missing data is an inevitable aspect of every empirical research. Researchers developed several techniques to handle missing data to avoid information loss and biases. Over the past 50 years, these methods have become more and more efficient and also more complex. Building on previous review studies, this paper aims to analyze what kind of missing data handling methods are used among various scientific disciplines. For the analysis, we used nearly 50.000 scientific articles that were published between 1999 and 2016. JSTOR provided the data in text format. Furthermore, we utilized a text-mining approach to extract the necessary information from our corpus. Our results show that the usage of advanced missing data handling methods such as Multiple Imputation or Full Information Maximum Likelihood estimation is steadily growing in the examination period. Additionally, simpler methods, like listwise and pairwise deletion, are still in widespread use.

The monitoring of surface-water quality followed by water-quality modeling and analysis is essential for generating effective strategies in water resource management. However, water-quality studies are limited by the lack of complete and reliable data sets on surface-water-quality variables. These deficiencies are particularly noticeable in developing countries. This work focuses on surface-water-quality data from Santa Lucía Chico river (Uruguay), a mixed lotic and lentic river system. Data collected at six monitoring stations are publicly available at https://www.dinama.gub.uy/oan/datos-abiertos/calidad-agua/. The high temporal and spatial variability that characterizes water-quality variables and the high rate of missing values (between 50% and 70%) raises significant challenges. To deal with missing values, we applied several statistical and machine-learning imputation methods. The competing algorithms implemented belonged to both univariate and multivariate imputation methods (inverse distance weighting (IDW), Random Forest Regressor (RFR), Ridge (R), Bayesian Ridge (BR), AdaBoost (AB), Huber Regressor (HR), Support Vector Regressor (SVR), and K-nearest neighbors Regressor (KNNR)). IDW outperformed the others, achieving a very good performance (NSE greater than 0.8) in most cases. In this dataset, we include the original and imputed values for the following variables: Water temperature (Tw) Dissolved oxygen (DO) Electrical conductivity (EC) pH Turbidity (Turb) Nitrite (NO2-) Nitrate (NO3-) Total Nitrogen (TN) Each variable is identified as [STATION] VARIABLE FULL NAME (VARIABLE SHORT NAME) [UNIT METRIC]. More details about the study area, the original datasets, and the methodology adopted can be found in our paper https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6318. If you use this dataset in your work, please cite our paper: Rodríguez, R.; Pastorini, M.; Etcheverry, L.; Chreties, C.; Fossati, M.; Castro, A.; Gorgoglione, A. Water-Quality Data Imputation with a High Percentage of Missing Values: A Machine Learning Approach. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6318. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116318 {"references": ["Rodr\u00edguez, R.; Pastorini, M.; Etcheverry, L.; Chreties, C.; Fossati, M.; Castro, A.; Gorgoglione, A. Water-Quality Data Imputation with a High Percentage of Missing Values: A Machine Learning Approach. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6318. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116318"]}

1. NCCTG Lung cancer datasetSurvival in patients with advanced lung cancer from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group. Performance scores rate how well the patient can perform usual daily activities.2.CNV measurements of CNV of GBM This dataset records the information about copy number variation of Glioblastoma (GBM).Abstract:In biology and medicine, conservative patient and data collection malpractice can lead to missing or incorrect values in patient registries, which can affect both diagnosis and prognosis. Insufficient or biased patient information significantly impedes the sensitivity and accuracy of predicting cancer survival. In bioinformatics, making a best guess of the missing values and identifying the incorrect values are collectively called “imputation”. Existing imputation methods work by establishing a model based on the data mechanism of the missing values. Existing imputation methods work well under two assumptions: 1) the data is missing completely at random, and 2) the percentage of missing values is not high. These are not cases found in biomedical datasets, such as the Cancer Genome Atlas Glioblastoma Copy-Number Variant dataset (TCGA: 108 columns), or the North Central Cancer Treatment Group Lung Cancer (NCCTG) dataset (NCCTG: 9 columns). We tested six existing imputation methods, but only two of them worked with these datasets: The Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) and K-nearest Algorithm (KNN). Predictive Mean Matching (PMM) and Classification and Regression Trees (CART) worked only with the NCCTG lung cancer dataset with fewer columns, except when the dataset contains 45% missing data. The quality of the imputed values using existing methods is bad because they do not meet the two assumptions.In our study, we propose a Restricted Boltzmann Machine (RBM)-based imputation method to cope with low randomness and the high percentage of the missing values. RBM is an undirected, probabilistic and parameterized two-layer neural network model, which is often used for extracting abstract information from data, especially for high-dimensional data with unknown or non-standard distributions. In our benchmarks, we applied our method to two cancer datasets: 1) NCCTG, and 2) TCGA. The running time, root mean squared error (RMSE) of the different methods were gauged. The benchmarks for the NCCTG dataset show that our method performs better than other methods when there is 5% missing data in the dataset, with 4.64 RMSE lower than the best KNN. For the TCGA dataset, our method achieved 0.78 RMSE lower than the best KNN.In addition to imputation, RBM can achieve simultaneous predictions. We compared the RBM model with four traditional prediction methods. The running time and area under the curve (AUC) were measured to evaluate the performance. Our RBM-based approach outperformed traditional methods. Specifically, the AUC was up to 19.8% higher than the multivariate logistic regression model in the NCCTG lung cancer dataset, and the AUC was higher than the Cox proportional hazard regression model, with 28.1% in the TCGA dataset.Apart from imputation and prediction, RBM models can detect outliers in one pass by allowing the reconstruction of all the inputs in the visible layer with in a single backward pass. Our results show that RBM models have achieved higher precision and recall on detecting outliers than other methods.

Replication and simulation reproduction materials for the article "The MIDAS Touch: Accurate and Scalable Missing-Data Imputation with Deep Learning." Please see the README file for a summary of the contents and the Replication Guide for a more detailed description. Article abstract: Principled methods for analyzing missing values, based chiefly on multiple imputation, have become increasingly popular yet can struggle to handle the kinds of large and complex data that are also becoming common. We propose an accurate, fast, and scalable approach to multiple imputation, which we call MIDAS (Multiple Imputation with Denoising Autoencoders). MIDAS employs a class of unsupervised neural networks known as denoising autoencoders, which are designed to reduce dimensionality by corrupting and attempting to reconstruct a subset of data. We repurpose denoising autoencoders for multiple imputation by treating missing values as an additional portion of corrupted data and drawing imputations from a model trained to minimize the reconstruction error on the originally observed portion. Systematic tests on simulated as well as real social science data, together with an applied example involving a large-scale electoral survey, illustrate MIDAS's accuracy and efficiency across a range of settings. We provide open-source software for implementing MIDAS.

The Missing Person Information Clearinghouse was established July 1, 1985, within the Department of Public Safety providing a program for compiling, coordinating and disseminating information in relation to missing persons and unidentified body/persons. Housed within the Division of Criminal Investigation, the clearinghouse assists in helping to locate missing persons through public awareness and cooperation, and in educating law enforcement officers and the general public about missing person issues.

This dataset was used in the NN5 forecasting competition. It contains 111 time series from the banking domain. The goal is predicting the daily cash withdrawals from ATMs in UK.

The original dataset contains missing values. A missing value on a particular day is replaced by the median across all the same days of the week along the whole series.

We propose a framework for meta-analysis of qualitative causal inferences. We integrate qualitative counterfactual inquiry with an approach from the quantitative causal inference literature called extreme value bounds. Qualitative counterfactual analysis uses the observed outcome and auxiliary information to infer what would have happened had the treatment been set to a different level. Imputing missing potential outcomes is hard and when it fails, we can fill them in under best- and worst-case scenarios. We apply our approach to 63 cases that could have experienced transitional truth commissions upon democratization, 8 of which did. Prior to any analysis, the extreme value bounds around the average treatment effect on authoritarian resumption are 100 percentage points wide; imputation shrinks the width of these bounds to 51 points. We further demonstrate our method by aggregating specialists' beliefs about causal effects gathered through an expert survey, shrinking the width of the bounds to 44 points.

1.The analysis of morphological diversity frequently relies on the use of multivariate methods for characterizing biological shape. However, many of these methods are intolerant of missing data, which can limit the use of rare taxa and hinder the study of broad patterns of ecological diversity and morphological evolution. This study applied a mutli-dataset approach to compare variation in missing data estimation and its effect on geometric morphometric analysis across taxonomically-variable groups, landmark position and sample sizes. 2.Missing morphometric landmark data was simulated from five real, complete datasets, including modern fish, primates and extinct theropod dinosaurs. Missing landmarks were then estimated using several standard approaches and a geometric-morphometric-specific method. The accuracy of missing data estimation was determined for each estimation method, landmark position, and morphological dataset. Procrustes superimposition was used to compare the eigenvectors and principal component scores of a geometric morphometric analysis of the original landmark data, to datasets with A) missing values estimated, or B) simulated incomplete specimens excluded, for varying levels of specimens incompleteness and sample sizes. 3.Standard estimation techniques were more reliable estimators and had lower impacts on morphometric analysis compared to a geometric-morphometric-specific estimator. For most datasets and estimation techniques, estimating missing data produced a better fit to the structure of the original data than exclusion of incomplete specimens, and this was maintained even at considerably reduced sample sizes. The impact of missing data on geometric morphometric analysis was disproportionately affected by the most fragmentary specimens. 4.Missing data estimation was influenced by variability of specific anatomical features, and may be improved by a better understanding of shape variation present in a dataset. Our results suggest that the inclusion of incomplete specimens through the use of effective missing data estimators better reflects the patterns of shape variation within a dataset than using only complete specimens, however the effectiveness of missing data estimation can be maximized by excluding only the most incomplete specimens. It is advised that missing data estimators be evaluated for each dataset and landmark independently, as the effectiveness of estimators can vary strongly and unpredictably between different taxa and structures.

To fully understand macroevolutionary patterns and processes, we need to include both extant and extinct species in our models. This requires phylogenetic trees with both living and fossil taxa at the tips. One way to infer such phylogenies is the Total Evidence approach which uses molecular data from living taxa and morphological data from living and fossil taxa.Although the Total Evidence approach is very promising, it requires a great deal of data that can be hard to collect. Therefore this method is likely to suffer from missing data issues that may affect its ability to infer correct phylogenies.Here we use simulations to assess the effects of missing data on tree topologies inferred from Total Evidence matrices. We investigate three major factors that directly affect the completeness and the size of the morphological part of the matrix: the proportion of living taxa with no morphological data, the amount of missing data in the fossil record, and the overall number of morphological characters in the matrix. We infer phylogenies from complete matrices and from matrices with various amounts of missing data, and then compare missing data topologies to the "best" tree topology inferred using the complete matrix.We find that the number of living taxa with morphological characters and the overall number of morphological characters in the matrix, are more important than the amount of missing data in the fossil record for recovering the "best" tree topology. Therefore, we suggest that sampling effort should be focused on morphological data collection for living species to increase the accuracy of topological inference in a Total Evidence framework. Additionally, we find that Bayesian methods consistently outperform other tree inference methods. We therefore recommend using Bayesian consensus trees to fix the tree topology prior to further analyses.

NamUs is the only national repository for missing, unidentified, and unclaimed persons cases. The program provides a singular resource hub for law enforcement, medical examiners, coroners, and investigating professionals. It is the only national database for missing, unidentified, and unclaimed persons that allows limited access to the public, empowering family members to take a more proactive role in the search for their missing loved ones.

This dataset was used in the KDD Cup 2018 forecasting competition. It contains long hourly time series representing the air quality levels in 59 stations in 2 cities: Beijing (35 stations) and London (24 stations) from 01/01/2017 to 31/03/2018. The air quality level is represented in multiple measurements such as PM2.5, PM10, NO2, CO, O3 and SO2.

The dataset uploaded here contains 282 hourly time series which have been categorized using city, station name and air quality measurement.

This dataset is built on data from Overbuff with the help of python and selenium. Development environment - Jupyter Notebook.

The tables contain the data for competitive seasons 1-4 and for quick play for each hero and rank along with the standard statistics (common to each hero as well as information belonging to a specific hero).

Note: data for some columns are missing on Overbuff site (there is '—' instead of a specific value), so they were dropped: Scoped Crits for Ashe and Widowmaker, Rip Tire Kills for Junkrat, Minefield Kills for Wrecking Ball. 'Self Healing' column for Bastion was dropped too as Bastion doesn't have this property anymore in OW2. Also, there are no values for "Javelin Spin Kills / 10min" for Orisa in season 1 (the column was dropped). Overall, all missing values were cleaned.

Attention: Overbuff doesn't contain info about OW 1 competitive seasons (when you change a skill tier, the data isn't changed). If you know a site where it's possible to get this data, please, leave a comment. Thank you!

The code on GitHub .

All procedure is done in 5 stages:

Stage 1:

Data is retrieved directly from HTML elements on the page with the selenium tool on python.

Stage 2:

After scraping, data was cleansed: 1) Deleted comma separator on thousands (e.g. 1,009 => 1009). 2) Translated time representation (e.g. '01:23') to seconds (1*60 + 23 => 83). 3) Lúcio has become Lucio, Torbjörn - Torbjorn.

Stage 3:

Data were arranged into a table and saved to CSV.

Stage 4:

Columns which are supposed to have only numeric values are checked. All non-numeric values are dropped. This stage helps to find missing values which contain '—' instead and delete them.

Stage 5:

Additional missing values are searched for and dealt with. It's either column rename that happens (as the program cannot infer the correct column name for missing values) or a column drop. This stage ensures all wrong data are truly fixed.

The procedure to fetch the data takes 7 minutes on average.

This project and code were born from this GitHub code.

Although social scientists devote considerable effort to mitigating measurement error during data collection, they often ignore the issue during data analysis. And although many statistical methods have been proposed for reducing measurement error-induced biases, few have been widely used because of implausible assumptions, high levels of model dependence, difficult computation, or inapplicability with multiple mismeasured variables. We develop an easy-to-use alternative without these problems; it generalizes the popular multiple imputation (MI) framework by treating missing data problems as a limiting special case of extreme measurement error, and corrects for both. Like MI, the proposed framework is a simple two-step procedure, so that in the second step researchers can use whatever statistical method they would have if there had been no problem in the first place. We also offer empirical illustrations, open source software that implements all the methods described herein, and a companion paper with technical details and extensions (Blackwell, Honaker, and King, 2014b). Notes: This is the first of two articles to appear in the same issue of the same journal by the same authors. The second is “A Unified Approach to Measurement Error and Missing Data: Details and Extensions.” See also: Missing Data

Abstract: Given the methodological sophistication of the debate over the “political resource curse”—the purported negative relationship between natural resource wealth (in particular oil wealth) and democracy—it is surprising that scholars have not paid more attention to the basic statistical issue of how to deal with missing data. This article highlights the problems caused by the most common strategy for analyzing missing data in the political resource curse literature—listwise deletion—and investigates how addressing such problems through the best-practice technique of multiple imputation affects empirical results. I find that multiple imputation causes the results of a number of influential recent studies to converge on a key common finding: A political resource curse does exist, but only since the widespread nationalization of petroleum industries in the 1970s. This striking finding suggests that much of the controversy over the political resource curse has been caused by a neglect of missing-data issues.

This is a basic web map for showing the Yosemite Search and Rescue missing person dataset that shows the initial planning point, point found, and direct line path between the two.For more information, please Jared Doke's MS Thesis: Analysis of Search Incidents and Lost Person Behavior in Yosemite National Park.Study of wilderness search and rescue (WiSAR) incidents suggests a dependency on demographics as well as physical geography in relation to decisions made before/after becoming lost and subsequent locations in which subjects are found. Thus an understanding of the complex relationship between demographics and physical geography could enhance the responders’ ability to locate the subject in a timely manner. Various global datasets have been organized to provide general distance and feature based geostatistical methods for describing this relationship. However, there is some question as to the applicability of these generalized datasets to local incidents that are dominated by a specific physical geography. This study consists of two primary objectives related to the allocation of geographic probability intended to manage the overall size of the search area. The first objective considers the applicability of a global dataset of lost person incidents to a localized environment with limited geographic diversity. This is followed by a comparison between a commonly used Euclidean distance statistic and an alternative travel-cost model that accounts for the influence of anthropogenic and landscape features on subject mobility and travel time. In both instances, lost person incident data from years 2000 to 2010 for Yosemite National Park is used and compared to a large pool of internationally compiled cases consisting of similar subject profiles.

The Generalized Euclidean Distance (GED) has been extensively used to conduct morphological disparity analyses based on palaeontological matrices of discrete characters. This is in part because some implementations allow the use of morphological matrices with high percentages of missing data without needing to prune taxa for a subsequent ordination of the data set. Previous studies have suggested that this way of using the GED may generate a bias in the resulting morphospace, but a detailed study of this possible effect was still lacking. Here, we test if the percentage of missing data for a taxon artificially influences its position in the morphospace, and if missing data affects pre- and post-ordination disparity measures. We find that this use of the GED creates a systematic bias, whereby taxa with higher percentages of missing data are placed closer to the centre of the morphospace than those with more complete scorings. This bias extends into pre- and post-ordination calculations of disparity measures and can lead to erroneous interpretations of disparity patterns, especially if specimens present in a particular time interval or clade have distinct proportions of missing information. We suggest that this implementation of the GED should be used with caution, especially in cases with high percentages of missing data. Results recovered using an alternative distance measure, Maximum Observed Rescaled Distance (MORD), are more robust to missing data. As a consequence, we suggest that MORD is a more appropriate distance measure than GED when analysing data sets with high amounts of missing data.

This dataset contains the potential influencers of the bitcoin price. There are a total of 18 daily time series including hash rate, block size, mining difficulty etc. It also encompasses public opinion in the form of tweets and google searches mentioning the keyword bitcoin. The data is scraped from the interactive web-graphs available at https://bitinfocharts.com. {"references": ["BitInfoCharts, 2021. Cryptocurrency statistics. URL https://bitinfocharts.com"]}

On this page, you find the imputed tax loss carryforward (TLCF) values based on the algorithm presented in Max, Wielhouwer & Wiersma (2023). Estimating and imputing missing tax loss carryforward data to reduce measurement error. European Accounting Review 32(1), 55-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2021.1924812 . Note that the dataset contains only the imputations for the missing values on Compustat. If the Compustat TLCF is available, we have not included it in the dataset here. We download all observations from Compustat from the period 1982 up until the most recent year. Missing values on the input variables for the Shevlin (1990) taxable income measure are replaced by zero. We drop firms from the sample if years are missing in their time series. Note: We seek to update the dataset each year with the latest imputations, so pay attention to the 'Versions' tab of this dataset. Each update will be posted in a new version.

• Hello Kagglers,
• If you are new to kaggle and want to learn handling of datetime type dataset, this can be helpful for you to access and get best possible date time values. It includes some missing values in date time columns.
• This is a dataset for beginners who want to learn EDA on datetime type data.
• Three out of eight columns are datetime type convertible and object type in raw data.
• You can use any method for filling missing values of datetime which you find will be best match

The last decade has seen significant advances in the application of quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomics technologies to tackle important questions in plant biology. The current standard for quantitative proteomics in plants is the use of data-dependent acquisition (DDA) analysis with or without the use of chemical labels. However, the DDA approach preferentially measures higher abundant proteins, and often requires data imputation due to quantification inconsistency between samples. In this study we systematically benchmarked a recently developed library-free data-independent acquisition (directDIA) method against a state-of-the-art DDA label-free quantitative proteomics workflow for plants. We next developed a novel acquisition approach combining MS1-level BoxCar acquisition with MS2-level directDIA analysis that we call BoxCarDIA. DirectDIA achieves a 33% increase in protein quantification over traditional DDA, and BoxCarDIA a further 8%, without any changes in instrumentation, offline fractionation, or increases in mass-spectrometer run time. BoxCarDIA, especially, offers wholly reproducible quantification of proteins between replicate injections, thereby addressing the long-standing missing-value problem in label-free quantitative proteomics. Further, we find that the gains in dynamic range sampling by directDIA and BoxCarDIA translate to deeper quantification of key, low abundant, functional protein classes (e.g., protein kinases and transcription factors) that are underrepresented in data acquired using DDA. We applied these methods to perform a quantitative proteomic comparison of dark and light grown Arabidopsis cell cultures, providing a critical resource for future plant interactome studies. Our results establish BoxCarDIA as the new method of choice in quantitative proteomics using Orbitrap-type mass-spectrometers, particularly for proteomes with large dynamic range such as that of plants.