Finland GDP: GCF: Fixed: ME: Machinery, Equipment & Weapons Systems data was reported at 2,427.000 EUR mn in Mar 2018. This records a decrease from the previous number of 3,214.000 EUR mn for Dec 2017. Finland GDP: GCF: Fixed: ME: Machinery, Equipment & Weapons Systems data is updated quarterly, averaging 1,706.000 EUR mn from Mar 1990 (Median) to Mar 2018, with 113 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3,214.000 EUR mn in Dec 2017 and a record low of 1,042.000 EUR mn in Mar 1994. Finland GDP: GCF: Fixed: ME: Machinery, Equipment & Weapons Systems data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Statistics Finland. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Finland – Table FI.A001: ESA 2010: GDP: by Expenditure: Current Price.

Graph and download economic data for Financial System Deposits to GDP for Finland (DDDI08FIA156NWDB) from 1960 to 2021 about Finland, deposits, financial, and GDP.

Finland GDP: sa: GCF: Fixed: ME: Machinery, Equipment & Weapons Systems data was reported at 2,747.000 EUR mn in Mar 2018. This records an increase from the previous number of 2,622.000 EUR mn for Dec 2017. Finland GDP: sa: GCF: Fixed: ME: Machinery, Equipment & Weapons Systems data is updated quarterly, averaging 1,710.000 EUR mn from Mar 1990 (Median) to Mar 2018, with 113 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2,747.000 EUR mn in Mar 2018 and a record low of 1,061.000 EUR mn in Dec 1993. Finland GDP: sa: GCF: Fixed: ME: Machinery, Equipment & Weapons Systems data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Statistics Finland. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Finland – Table FI.A002: ESA 2010: GDP: by Expenditure: Current Price: Seasonally Adjusted.

Financial inclusion is critical in reducing poverty and achieving inclusive economic growth. When people can participate in the financial system, they are better able to start and expand businesses, invest in their children’s education, and absorb financial shocks. Yet prior to 2011, little was known about the extent of financial inclusion and the degree to which such groups as the poor, women, and rural residents were excluded from formal financial systems. By collecting detailed indicators about how adults around the world manage their day-to-day finances, the Global Findex allows policy makers, researchers, businesses, and development practitioners to track how the use of financial services has changed over time. The database can also be used to identify gaps in access to the formal financial system and design policies to expand financial inclusion.

Finland GDP: GCF: Fixed: Machinery, Equipment, Transport Equipment & Weapons Systems (ME) data was reported at 2,880.000 EUR mn in Mar 2018. This records a decrease from the previous number of 3,640.000 EUR mn for Dec 2017. Finland GDP: GCF: Fixed: Machinery, Equipment, Transport Equipment & Weapons Systems (ME) data is updated quarterly, averaging 2,213.000 EUR mn from Mar 1990 (Median) to Mar 2018, with 113 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3,640.000 EUR mn in Dec 2017 and a record low of 1,254.000 EUR mn in Mar 1994. Finland GDP: GCF: Fixed: Machinery, Equipment, Transport Equipment & Weapons Systems (ME) data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Statistics Finland. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Finland – Table FI.A001: ESA 2010: GDP: by Expenditure: Current Price.

Finland GDP: CL 2010p: GCF: ow Fixed: ME: Machinery, Equipment & Weapons Systems data was reported at 2,296.000 EUR mn in Jun 2018. This records an increase from the previous number of 1,820.000 EUR mn for Mar 2018. Finland GDP: CL 2010p: GCF: ow Fixed: ME: Machinery, Equipment & Weapons Systems data is updated quarterly, averaging 1,640.500 EUR mn from Mar 1990 (Median) to Jun 2018, with 114 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3,096.000 EUR mn in Dec 2017 and a record low of 860.000 EUR mn in Sep 1993. Finland GDP: CL 2010p: GCF: ow Fixed: ME: Machinery, Equipment & Weapons Systems data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Statistics Finland. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Finland – Table FI.A006: ESA 2010: GDP: by Expenditure: Chain Linked 2010 Price.

The data contain information on the fair value of Finnish foreign exports between 1840 and 2000. The data were gathered from the Official Statistics of Finland by Statistics Finland, and the monograph entitled "Suomen taloushistoria. 3: Historiallinen tilasto" (by Kaarina Vattula), which has also been translated into English under the title "The Economic History of Finland 3, Historical Statistics". The data contain 160 years of Finnish export data. The data gathering was financed by the University of Helsinki, the Academy of Finland, and the Yrjö Jahnsson Foundation. The data contain yearly export values categorised by geographical target domain. The values of exports to Russia (including the Soviet Union), Great Britain, Germany (including West and East Germany), Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Estonia, the Netherlands, Belgium (including Luxembourg), Italy, France, the United States, Japan, and China are displayed. Furthermore, the values of exports are displayed in relation to larger geographical areas, such as Europe, America, Asia, Africa, and Oceania. The data also contain variables for the total value of exports and the volume index of exports (with the index for year 1926 being 100).

Finland GDP: CL 2010p: GCF: ow Fixed: Machinery, Equipment, Transport Equipment & Weapons Systems (ME) data was reported at 2,777.000 EUR mn in Mar 2018. This records a decrease from the previous number of 3,488.000 EUR mn for Dec 2017. Finland GDP: CL 2010p: GCF: ow Fixed: Machinery, Equipment, Transport Equipment & Weapons Systems (ME) data is updated quarterly, averaging 2,181.000 EUR mn from Mar 1990 (Median) to Mar 2018, with 113 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3,488.000 EUR mn in Dec 2017 and a record low of 1,151.000 EUR mn in Mar 1994. Finland GDP: CL 2010p: GCF: ow Fixed: Machinery, Equipment, Transport Equipment & Weapons Systems (ME) data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Statistics Finland. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Finland – Table FI.A006: ESA 2010: GDP: by Expenditure: Chain Linked 2010 Price.

The survey is part of the larger INNOEVAL survey evaluating the Finnish National Innovation System from several angles. In this study, the opinions of Finnish public actors on the Finnish National Innovation System were queried. First, the respondents were not only asked to rate the current Finnish National Innovation System (NIS), but also the NIS as it was five years ago, and the NIS as it is expected to be after five years. Their views were probed on the role of public sector actors in the Finnish NIS from the point of view of their own organisations. In addition, they indicated the importance of various actors (e.g. Tekes (the Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation), Sitra (the Finnish Innovation Fund), the Academy of Finland) for their organisations. The respondents were also asked to evaluate the orientation of the current Finnish innovation policy on a scale from "strong technology push" to "strong demand pull". Next, they indicated whether universities, polytechnics and public research organisations have successfully taken care of various tasks, such as international top-class research, research for the national needs, and the production of experts for the international business activities as well as for the needs of local business activities. Views were charted on the innovation system's ability to support growth entrepreneurship. In addition, the respondents were asked whether they experienced that the NIS also promotes regional policy agendas, and whether the national innovation policy is equally effective in all regions of Finland. The respondents were asked about the importance of national and international networks on the activities of their own organisations, and they were presented with a set of attitudinal statements on the impact of the new Universities Act, the centres of strategic excellence (SHOKs), and the potential reform of publicly funded research organisations on the NIS. The respondents were asked about the types of services (e.g. financing, information services, and promotion of international labour mobility) their organisations provided to other actors of the Finnish innovation system. They were also asked whether they experienced that other public and private actors provided similar services and whether the co-operation between service providers is effortless. Further questions charted the share of the respondents' personnel that had a university or technical university degree. In addition, they were asked about the primary users of their services or financing. The respondents also evaluated the innovation system from the point of view of promoting private enterprise and innovation activities, and told how well governmental and private research organisations and universities and polytechnics matched the information needs of their organisations. Finally, the respondents were asked how their organisations had reacted to the new national innovation strategy published in July 2008, and whether the strategy requires changes in the activities of their organisations.

The survey is part of the larger INNOEVAL survey evaluating the Finnish National Innovation System from several angles. In this study, the opinions of Finnish firms on the Finnish National Innovation System were queried.

First, the respondents were not only asked to rate the current Finnish National Innovation System (NIS), but also the NIS as it was five years ago, and the NIS as it is expected to be after five years. Their views were probed on the role of public sector actors in the Finnish NIS from the point of view of their own firms. In addition, they indicated the importance of various actors (e.g. Tekes (the Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation), Sitra (the Finnish Innovation Fund), the Academy of Finland) for their firms. The respondents were also asked to evaluate the orientation of the current Finnish innovation policy on a scale from "strong technology push" to "strong demand pull". Next, they indicated whether universities, polytechnics and public research organisations have successfully taken care of various tasks, such as international top-class research, research for the national needs, and the production of experts for the international business activities as well as for the needs of local business activities.

Views were charted on the innovation system's ability to support growth entrepreneurship. In addition, the respondents were asked whether they experienced that the NIS also promotes regional policy agendas, and whether the national innovation policy is equally effective in all regions of Finland. The respondents were asked about the importance of national and international networks on the activities of their own organisations, and they were presented with a set of attitudinal statements on the impact of the new Universities Act, the centres of strategic excellence (SHOKs), and the potential reform of publicly funded research organisations on the NIS.

The primary source of earnings for the respondents' companies was charted, as well as the companies' primary position in the distribution chain. The respondents evaluated the importance of various aspects, such as a generally positive attitude towards risk taking in society and a motivating company and capital taxation scheme, from the perspective of their operations. In addition, they characterised the innovation system against the backdrop of facilitating private business and innovation activities, and gave their opinions on how efficient they considered tax incentives regarding earnings and profit sharing in increasing the number of growth companies. The respondents were also asked about whether their companies had engaged in innovation activities in the last three years, how important they considered various domestic and foreign factors from the perspective of their companies' innovation activities, and what kind of role end users had in their innovation activities. Finally, the respondents were asked whether any of their companies' investment, R&D, or any other type of projects had been deferred or cancelled due to the global financial crisis.

The survey studies what Finns think about the EU membership and its effects. The respondents were asked how interested they were of matters connected to Finland's membership in the EU, how actively they followed these matters and how well-informed of them they considered themselves to be. They were also asked what kind of policy and development goals Finland should promote as a member of the union. For example, the respondents were asked to comment on whether Finland should concentrate on advancing its own national interests or on issues concerning the whole union. Finns' opinions about the effects of the EU were examined with questions about the standard of living, taxation, social services, the equality between men and women, Finland's relations with foreign countries, public morals, and the status of persons belonging to various socio-economic groups. One theme was EU's enlargement to Eastern and Western Europe and the Baltic Countries. The respondents were asked to evaluate what kind of consequences the enlargement might have. The respondents' attitude towards Finland's membership in NATO under different conditions was canvassed. The conditions mentioned included the Baltic Countries joining NATO, Sweden joining or both the Baltic Countries and Sweden joining. Their opinions about the integration of European Union, that is, increasing the economical and political cooperation and unifying the legislation, were also surveyed. In connection with the euro, the respondents were asked whether they found it easy or difficult to get used to the new currency, whether Finnish identity is affected by the renunciation of the national currency, and whether travel and shopping has become easier. Opinions on the effects of euro on the international economy, or on the sense of togetherness between the citizens of EU countries were also surveyed. Background variables included the respondents' gender, age group, size of municipality of residence, province of residence, level of education, occupational group, industry of employment, membership in a trade union, and which party R would vote for if the parliamentary elections were held at that moment.

Finland FI: Other Depository Corporations: MFSM 2000: Claims on State and Local Government data was reported at 14,500.000 EUR mn in 2017. This records a decrease from the previous number of 14,636.000 EUR mn for 2016. Finland FI: Other Depository Corporations: MFSM 2000: Claims on State and Local Government data is updated yearly, averaging 7,250.000 EUR mn from Dec 2001 (Median) to 2017, with 17 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 14,636.000 EUR mn in 2016 and a record low of 2,867.000 EUR mn in 2001. Finland FI: Other Depository Corporations: MFSM 2000: Claims on State and Local Government data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by International Monetary Fund. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Finland – Table FI.IMF.IFS: Financial System: Deposit Money Banks: Annual.

The survey is part of the larger INNOEVAL survey evaluating the Finnish National Innovation System from several angles. In this study, the opinions of Finnish regional intermediaries on the Finnish National Innovation System were queried. First, the respondents were not only asked to rate the current Finnish National Innovation System (NIS), but also the NIS as it was five years ago, and the NIS as it is expected to be after five years. Their views were probed on what kind of entity public sector actors in the Finnish NIS form. In addition, they indicated the importance of various actors (e.g. Tekes (the Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation), Sitra (the Finnish Innovation Fund), the Academy of Finland) for their organisation. The respondents were also asked to evaluate the orientation of the current Finnish innovation policy on a scale from "strong technology push" to "strong demand pull". Next, they indicated whether universities, polytechnics and public research organisations have successfully taken care of various tasks, such as international top-class research, research for the national needs, and the production of experts for the international business activities as well as for the needs of local business activities. Views were charted on the innovation system's ability to support growth entrepreneurship. In addition, the respondents were asked whether they experienced that the NIS also promotes regional policy agendas, and whether the national innovation policy is equally effective in all regions of Finland. The respondents were asked about the importance of national and international networks on the activities of their own organisations, and they were presented with a set of attitudinal statements on the impact of the new Universities Act, the centres of strategic excellence (SHOKs), and the potential reform of publicly funded research organisations on the NIS. The respondents were asked about the types of services (e.g. financing, information services, and promotion of international labour mobility) their organisations provided to other actors of the Finnish innovation system. They were also asked whether they experienced that other public and private actors provided similar services and whether the co-operation between service providers is effortless. Further questions charted the share of the respondents' personnel that had a university or technical university degree. In addition, they were asked about the primary users of their services or financing. The respondents also evaluated the innovation system from the point of view of promoting private enterprise and innovation activities, and told about their organisations' sources of funding. Finally, the respondents were asked how their organisations had reacted to the new national innovation strategy published in July 2008, and whether the strategy requires changes in the activities of their organisations.

Finland FI: Depository Corporations Survey: MFSM 2000: Liabilities to Central Government data was reported at 3,444.000 EUR mn in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 2,868.000 EUR mn for 2016. Finland FI: Depository Corporations Survey: MFSM 2000: Liabilities to Central Government data is updated yearly, averaging 2,730.000 EUR mn from Dec 2001 (Median) to 2017, with 17 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4,945.000 EUR mn in 2008 and a record low of 1,305.000 EUR mn in 2006. Finland FI: Depository Corporations Survey: MFSM 2000: Liabilities to Central Government data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by International Monetary Fund. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Finland – Table FI.IMF.IFS: Financial System: Monetary: Annual.

The annual survey studied employee opinion on the quality of working life in Finland. Main themes were psychosocial working environment, job characteristics, pay systems, satisfaction with the job, employment security, training and development, capacity to work, and bullying and discrimination at work. The year 2010 survey contained new questions on local bargaining on working hours/time arrangements and pay systems.

First, the respondents were asked how many years they had worked for the employer they were working for at the time, type of contract, number of persons at the workplace, and what kind of changes there had been in staff numbers, working hours, contracts, and tasks during the past 12 months, and whether people had been transferred to other units. A number of questions pertained to co-operation negotiations, their process and results. Further questions covered team work, whether there had been conflicts at the workplace, between what groups and whether the conflicts had decreased or increased over the past 12 months. Incidents of bullying, harassment and violence were charted.

Next set of questions investigated the respondent's autonomy and influence at work and other job characteristics, overtime and its compensation, flexible working time arrangements, and R's membership in a trade union or professional association. Changes over the past year in workload, physical or mental stress, in access to training etc were explored as well as pay and bonus systems, and satisfaction with pay. Psychosocial working environment was charted with a number of questions, for instance, whether employees were treated equally, was there support for trying new things and so on. One topic pertained to whether the respondents had presented any ideas to improve working conditions, products, services or working methods at the workplace and whether there had been other development initiatives. The respondents' participation in job-related training and development was investigated.

One theme pertained to job satisfaction. The respondents were asked to what extent they agreed with a number of statements relating to staff sufficiency, organisation of work, access to information, physical or mental stress etc. They were asked how likely it was that they would be dismissed or laid off, or their tasks or working hours would be changed over the next year. Views were probed on the employer's financial situation, effects of the economic recession on the workplace, employment situation in Finland and possible changes in working life. A number of questions investigated how the employees' capacity to work and occupational health and safety had been taken into account at the workplace, the respondents' sickness absences, and estimate of own mental and physical capacity to work. Discrimination at work based on ethnic group, age, gender and type of contract was explored.

Background variables included the respondent's year of birth, age, gender, region, type of municipality, education, economic activity, status in employment, industry of employment, occupational group, employer type, weekly working hours, and additional jobs. Information on age, gender, region, type of municipality and education level were obtained from registers. The other background variables were obtained from the Labour Force Survey 2010 telephone interviews which were often conducted together with the Finnish Working Life Barometer interview.

The Citizens' Pulse surveys examine Finnish attitudes and opinions on current issues. Main themes in the surveys include the activity of authorities, future expectations, trust, and the respondents' own state of mind. This collection round also included questions on the Russian invasion of Ukraine, sustainability, climate change and issues that the Finnish government should address. The fifth collection round of 2024 surveyed the respondents' trust in other people and various institutions (e.g. the Finnish Government, the health care system, the media, and the Finnish Defence Forces). The respondents were asked to evaluate how fair or unfair they thought Finnish society was at present, and their state of mind was examined with questions on various matters relating to health, well-being, and their situation in life. The questions covered, for example, the respondents' own mental well-being, whether they were worried about the adequacy of their income, their confidence in their future, and experiences of stress. Additionally, the respondents were asked to evaluate whether an atmosphere of crisis prevailed amongst Finns and whether they were worried about the state of general government finances (state and municipalities). The respondents' views were investigated on which societal issues (e.g. promotion of climate action, national defence, poverty reduction, effective healthcare, operating conditions of businesses and investment opportunities) the Finnish government should focus on in the near future. Opinions on whether Finland's national debt should be reduced regardless of the resulting cuts in benefits and welfare it would entail for Finnish citizens and whether social security cuts can be considered acceptable if they provide an incentive to take up work and increase employment were also surveyed. The next set of questions focused on the Russian invasion of Ukraine and national security in Finland. The respondents were asked how concerned they were about the crisis in Ukraine and its effects, and whether they were concerned that the war might expand beyond Ukraine. The respondents were also asked whether they were concerned that Russia might take military action against Finland or try to interfere with the functioning of Finnish society. Opinions on the economic sanctions imposed on Russia by the EU and whether Finland should be ready to receive significant numbers of refugees from Ukraine if necessary were charted. The respondents were asked whether Finland's actions on the border with Russia had reinforced their sense security, whether Finland's response to Russian interference has been adequate and timely, and whether the respondents were concerned about Russia's recent actions. The respondents were also asked whether they had noticed any cyber security issues or instances where purposefully misleading claims based on misinformation were spread on social media or online over the previous month. The sustainability theme examined whether sufficient measures have been taken in Finland to promote the well-being of nature, people and the economy, and how well sustainable development is implemented in the activities of the state, municipalities and businesses, among others. The respondents were also asked if they knew the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (Agenda 2030). Finally, questions were asked about climate change, biodiversity loss, everyday environmental actions and influencing Finland's climate and nature policy. Background variables included the language responded in, the respondent's gender, age group, NUTS3 region of residence, highest level of education, household composition, and perceived financial situation of household.

Finland FI: Depository Corporations Survey: MFSM 2000: Euro Area Wide Residency: Claims on State and Local Government data was reported at 17,569.000 EUR mn in 2017. This records a decrease from the previous number of 17,988.000 EUR mn for 2016. Finland FI: Depository Corporations Survey: MFSM 2000: Euro Area Wide Residency: Claims on State and Local Government data is updated yearly, averaging 7,429.000 EUR mn from Dec 2001 (Median) to 2017, with 17 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 17,988.000 EUR mn in 2016 and a record low of 2,899.000 EUR mn in 2001. Finland FI: Depository Corporations Survey: MFSM 2000: Euro Area Wide Residency: Claims on State and Local Government data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by International Monetary Fund. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Finland – Table FI.IMF.IFS: Financial System: Monetary: Annual.

Finland FI: Claims on Other Sectors of The Domestic Economy: % of GDP data was reported at 110.464 % in 2017. This records a decrease from the previous number of 145.414 % for 2016. Finland FI: Claims on Other Sectors of The Domestic Economy: % of GDP data is updated yearly, averaging 131.935 % from Dec 2001 (Median) to 2017, with 17 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 189.502 % in 2011 and a record low of 55.912 % in 2001. Finland FI: Claims on Other Sectors of The Domestic Economy: % of GDP data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Finland – Table FI.World Bank.WDI: Bank Loans. Claims on other sectors of the domestic economy (IFS line 52S or 32S) include gross credit from the financial system to households, nonprofit institutions serving households, nonfinancial corporations, state and local governments, and social security funds.; ; International Monetary Fund, International Financial Statistics and data files, and World Bank and OECD GDP estimates.; Weighted average;

The survey charted Finnish attitudes and values. The respondents were presented with a series of attitudinal statements covering occupational life, work-life balance, social welfare, environmental issues, influencing, decision-making, political life, economy, globalisation, and political power. They were also asked how the government should prioritise different areas of its activity including employment, taxation, education, health care, environmental protection, social security, regional policy, and equality between men and women. The respondents also gave their opinions on whether different forces in society (e.g. labour movement, church, market forces, police, the media, citizens) have too much, just the right amount, or too little power. The respondents' views on taxation were charted by asking them whether taxes are generally too high in Finland, whether the security and services in Finnish society received in exchange for taxes are sufficient, whether the total tax rate should be lowered to the average level of the EU countries, whether the focus of taxation should be shifted from work to consumption, and whether the respondents experience their taxation as unjust. Opinions on the most desirable, the least desirable, and the most likely government coalition were investigated. Views were also probed on the party affiliation of the next prime minister, and on how different values should be emphasised in developing Finnish society (e.g. social and economic equality, ability to undertake bold reforms, freedom of competition and entrepreneurship, individual responsibility for one's own welfare). Opinions on women's position in the labour market were charted with the help of attitudinal statements. The respondents gave their views on whether women usually consider their decisions more carefully than men, whether female politicians are just as tough and calculating as their male co-workers, whether gender quotas should be used for instance in the management of enterprises, and whether it is wrong that women still do not always receive the same pay as men doing the same work. Finally, there were three questions on the EU membership, Euro, and EU enlargement. Background variables included the respondent's gender, age group, size of municipality of residence, education, and industry of employment.

Finland GDP: sa: GCF: Fixed: Machinery, Equipment, Transport Equipment & Weapons Systems (ME) data was reported at 3,218.000 EUR mn in Mar 2018. This records an increase from the previous number of 3,081.000 EUR mn for Dec 2017. Finland GDP: sa: GCF: Fixed: Machinery, Equipment, Transport Equipment & Weapons Systems (ME) data is updated quarterly, averaging 2,187.000 EUR mn from Mar 1990 (Median) to Mar 2018, with 113 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3,218.000 EUR mn in Mar 2018 and a record low of 1,316.000 EUR mn in Mar 1994. Finland GDP: sa: GCF: Fixed: Machinery, Equipment, Transport Equipment & Weapons Systems (ME) data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Statistics Finland. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Finland – Table FI.A002: ESA 2010: GDP: by Expenditure: Current Price: Seasonally Adjusted.