Finland - Income distribution was 3.73 in December of 2024, according to the EUROSTAT. The income distribution ratio considers the total income received by the 20 % of the population with the highest income to that received by the 20 % of the population with the lowest income.

The Gini coefficient in Finland increased between 2011 and 2021, indicating a slight growth in income inequality. In 2021, the Gini coefficient stood at 28.5 percent, increasing from the previous year.

The Gini coefficient measures the distribution of income among individuals or households within an economy. A Gini index of 0 corresponds to perfect income equality, while an index of 100 implies perfect income inequality.

Finland - Inequality of income distribution was 3.73 in December of 2024, according to the EUROSTAT. Trading Economics provides the current actual value, an historical data chart and related indicators for Finland - Inequality of income distribution - last updated from the EUROSTAT on November of 2025. Historically, Finland - Inequality of income distribution reached a record high of 3.78 in December of 2023 and a record low of 3.54 in December of 2017.

In 2022, the median disposable cash income of households in Finland was 33,773 euros. Employees had approximately 46,462 euros of disposable income per household, whereas students had roughly 14,841 euros at their disposal.

Finland - Income inequality for older people was 3.14 in December of 2024, according to the EUROSTAT. Trading Economics provides the current actual value, an historical data chart and related indicators for Finland - Income inequality for older people - last updated from the EUROSTAT on November of 2025. Historically, Finland - Income inequality for older people reached a record high of 3.33 in December of 2012 and a record low of 3.02 in December of 2018.

Finland Average Household Income per Household data was reported at 49,786.000 EUR in 2023. This records a decrease from the previous number of 52,262.000 EUR for 2022. Finland Average Household Income per Household data is updated yearly, averaging 48,666.000 EUR from Dec 1987 (Median) to 2023, with 37 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 54,941.000 EUR in 2021 and a record low of 34,367.000 EUR in 1987. Finland Average Household Income per Household data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Statistics Finland. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Finland – Table FI.H014: Average Household Income and Number of Household.

Historical dataset showing Finland income inequality - gini coefficient by year from N/A to N/A.

Finland FI: Income Share Held by Highest 10% data was reported at 22.400 % in 2015. This records an increase from the previous number of 22.000 % for 2014. Finland FI: Income Share Held by Highest 10% data is updated yearly, averaging 22.700 % from Dec 2003 (Median) to 2015, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 23.300 % in 2007 and a record low of 22.000 % in 2014. Finland FI: Income Share Held by Highest 10% data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Finland – Table FI.World Bank: Poverty. Percentage share of income or consumption is the share that accrues to subgroups of population indicated by deciles or quintiles.; ; World Bank, Development Research Group. Data are based on primary household survey data obtained from government statistical agencies and World Bank country departments. Data for high-income economies are from the Luxembourg Income Study database. For more information and methodology, please see PovcalNet (http://iresearch.worldbank.org/PovcalNet/index.htm).; ; The World Bank’s internationally comparable poverty monitoring database now draws on income or detailed consumption data from more than one thousand six hundred household surveys across 164 countries in six regions and 25 other high income countries (industrialized economies). While income distribution data are published for all countries with data available, poverty data are published for low- and middle-income countries and countries eligible to receive loans from the World Bank (such as Chile) and recently graduated countries (such as Estonia) only. See PovcalNet (http://iresearch.worldbank.org/PovcalNet/WhatIsNew.aspx) for definitions of geographical regions and industrialized countries.

Income share held by second 20% of Finland improved by 1.45% from 13.80 % in 2022 to 14.00 % in 2023. Since the 0.71% reduction in 2021, income share held by second 20% grew by 0.72% in 2023. Percentage share of income or consumption is the share that accrues to subgroups of population indicated by deciles or quintiles. Percentage shares by quintile may not sum to 100 because of rounding.

Finland FI: Income Share Held by Lowest 10% data was reported at 3.900 % in 2015. This stayed constant from the previous number of 3.900 % for 2014. Finland FI: Income Share Held by Lowest 10% data is updated yearly, averaging 3.800 % from Dec 2003 (Median) to 2015, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.000 % in 2005 and a record low of 3.700 % in 2010. Finland FI: Income Share Held by Lowest 10% data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Finland – Table FI.World Bank: Poverty. Percentage share of income or consumption is the share that accrues to subgroups of population indicated by deciles or quintiles.; ; World Bank, Development Research Group. Data are based on primary household survey data obtained from government statistical agencies and World Bank country departments. Data for high-income economies are from the Luxembourg Income Study database. For more information and methodology, please see PovcalNet (http://iresearch.worldbank.org/PovcalNet/index.htm).; ; The World Bank’s internationally comparable poverty monitoring database now draws on income or detailed consumption data from more than one thousand six hundred household surveys across 164 countries in six regions and 25 other high income countries (industrialized economies). While income distribution data are published for all countries with data available, poverty data are published for low- and middle-income countries and countries eligible to receive loans from the World Bank (such as Chile) and recently graduated countries (such as Estonia) only. See PovcalNet (http://iresearch.worldbank.org/PovcalNet/WhatIsNew.aspx) for definitions of geographical regions and industrialized countries.

Finland - Distribution of population by tenure status, type of household and income group - EU-SILC survey was 68.10% in December of 2024, according to the EUROSTAT. Trading Economics provides the current actual value, an historical data chart and related indicators for Finland - Distribution of population by tenure status, type of household and income group - EU-SILC survey - last updated from the EUROSTAT on November of 2025. Historically, Finland - Distribution of population by tenure status, type of household and income group - EU-SILC survey reached a record high of 74.30% in December of 2010 and a record low of 68.10% in December of 2024.

Income share held by third 20% of Finland remained stable at 17.30 % over the last 1 years. Percentage share of income or consumption is the share that accrues to subgroups of population indicated by deciles or quintiles. Percentage shares by quintile may not sum to 100 because of rounding.

Gross adjusted annual household disposable income per capita increased considerably over the observed years in Finland. In 2020, Finns had an income of over ** thousand U.S. dollars.

Finland - Income inequality for older people: Females was 3.03 in December of 2024, according to the EUROSTAT. Trading Economics provides the current actual value, an historical data chart and related indicators for Finland - Income inequality for older people: Females - last updated from the EUROSTAT on December of 2025. Historically, Finland - Income inequality for older people: Females reached a record high of 3.14 in December of 2012 and a record low of 2.87 in December of 2021.

The survey charted views on social inequality in Finland. The questions and statements covered topics such as working and studying, important things for succeeding in life, and the taxation in various income brackets. Some questions charted income disparity. The respondents were asked about whether it is just or unjust that people with higher incomes can buy better health care and better education for their children than people with lower incomes. Views were probed on how much the respondents thought various occupational groups earn, as well as how much they should earn. In addition, the respondents were asked about the amount of conflict between different social groups, and where they would put themselves and their childhood family on a social scale. The respondents indicated their parents' jobs at the time they themselves were 15 years of age, and they were asked whether their own present job had higher or lower status compared to their parents' jobs. In addition, they were asked about their parents' occupations and type of employer. The industry of employment of the respondents' first employer was charted, as well as the respondents' occupation in their first place of work. In view of their current job, type of employer and present occupation were queried. Views were also canvassed on whether the respondents experienced their pay to be just or unjust. The respondents were presented with five diagrams showing different types of hierarchy in society and asked to indicate which of them corresponded best with Finnish society. They were also asked what they thought Finnish society should be like. The number of books in childhood home present home was charted. The respondents' wealth was investigated by asking whether there would be any money left if they sold their home and paid off their mortgage. In addition, the respondents were also asked whether there would be any money left if they converted their savings, stocks, or bonds they owned to cash and paid off any personal debts they had. Background variables included the respondent's gender, age, marital status, level and duration of education, employment status, occupation, spouse's employment status and occupation, and variables related to social background such as parents' level of education.

The gini index in Finland was forecast to remain on a similar level in 2029 as compared to 2024 with **** points. According to this forecast, the gini will stay nearly the same over the forecast period. The Gini coefficient here measures the degree of income inequality on a scale from * (=total equality of incomes) to *** (=total inequality).The shown data are an excerpt of Statista's Key Market Indicators (KMI). The KMI are a collection of primary and secondary indicators on the macro-economic, demographic and technological environment in more than *** countries and regions worldwide. All input data are sourced from international institutions, national statistical offices, and trade associations. All data has been are processed to generate comparable datasets (see supplementary notes under details for more information).Find more key insights for the gini index in countries like Norway and Iceland.

Finland FI: Income Share Held by Second 20% data was reported at 14.000 % in 2015. This records a decrease from the previous number of 14.100 % for 2014. Finland FI: Income Share Held by Second 20% data is updated yearly, averaging 13.900 % from Dec 2003 (Median) to 2015, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 14.100 % in 2014 and a record low of 13.700 % in 2007. Finland FI: Income Share Held by Second 20% data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Finland – Table FI.World Bank: Poverty. Percentage share of income or consumption is the share that accrues to subgroups of population indicated by deciles or quintiles. Percentage shares by quintile may not sum to 100 because of rounding.; ; World Bank, Development Research Group. Data are based on primary household survey data obtained from government statistical agencies and World Bank country departments. Data for high-income economies are from the Luxembourg Income Study database. For more information and methodology, please see PovcalNet (http://iresearch.worldbank.org/PovcalNet/index.htm).; ; The World Bank’s internationally comparable poverty monitoring database now draws on income or detailed consumption data from more than one thousand six hundred household surveys across 164 countries in six regions and 25 other high income countries (industrialized economies). While income distribution data are published for all countries with data available, poverty data are published for low- and middle-income countries and countries eligible to receive loans from the World Bank (such as Chile) and recently graduated countries (such as Estonia) only. See PovcalNet (http://iresearch.worldbank.org/PovcalNet/WhatIsNew.aspx) for definitions of geographical regions and industrialized countries.

Finland FI: Income Share Held by Lowest 20% data was reported at 9.400 % in 2015. This stayed constant from the previous number of 9.400 % for 2014. Finland FI: Income Share Held by Lowest 20% data is updated yearly, averaging 9.300 % from Dec 2003 (Median) to 2015, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 9.500 % in 2005 and a record low of 9.200 % in 2010. Finland FI: Income Share Held by Lowest 20% data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Finland – Table FI.World Bank.WDI: Poverty. Percentage share of income or consumption is the share that accrues to subgroups of population indicated by deciles or quintiles. Percentage shares by quintile may not sum to 100 because of rounding.; ; World Bank, Development Research Group. Data are based on primary household survey data obtained from government statistical agencies and World Bank country departments. Data for high-income economies are from the Luxembourg Income Study database. For more information and methodology, please see PovcalNet (http://iresearch.worldbank.org/PovcalNet/index.htm).; ; The World Bank’s internationally comparable poverty monitoring database now draws on income or detailed consumption data from more than one thousand six hundred household surveys across 164 countries in six regions and 25 other high income countries (industrialized economies). While income distribution data are published for all countries with data available, poverty data are published for low- and middle-income countries and countries eligible to receive loans from the World Bank (such as Chile) and recently graduated countries (such as Estonia) only. See PovcalNet (http://iresearch.worldbank.org/PovcalNet/WhatIsNew.aspx) for definitions of geographical regions and industrialized countries.

In this paper we present the first estimate of the full income distribution in preindustrial Sweden (including present-day Finland). We draw on the schedule and the individual assessments devised by the authorities to distribute the 1613 Älvsborg ransom taxation to estimate income inequality, as well as the income shares of the top quantiles and of various social groups. We find that Sweden was relatively equal compared to other Early Modern European societies, for two main reasons: first, because the nobility, the clergy, the burghers, and other middle-rank social groups all held relatively small shares of the total income, and second, because the landless groups were less numerous in Sweden than in other societies. This resulted in a large share of the total income going to the relatively homogeneous group of landed peasants, who made up the majority of the population. Our study thus speak to the political historiography of Early Modern Sweden, within which negotiation and collaboration between the landed peasantry and the state has been seen as pivotal to the state formation process.

This statistic displays the income distribution of the poorest ** percent of earners in each European Union (EU) country. In 2015 the highest share of national equalized income that the lowest quartile group earned emerged from Czechia at **** percent of the national income. This was followed by Finland and Slovenia at **** percent and **** percent respectively.