A listing of NYS counties with accompanying Federal Information Processing System (FIPS) and US Postal Service ZIP codes sourced from the NYS GIS Clearinghouse.

This dataset, which represents county Federal Information Processing System (FIPS) codes for each county as a raster, is utilized by reVX to compute setbacks (distances). Setbacks can be computed either locally (on a per-county basis with specified distances or multipliers) or globally under a generic setback multiplier assumption applied to either the turbine tip height or the base setback distance. A County FIPS code is a five-digit numerical identifier that uniquely identifies counties and county equivalents in the United States The initial two digits represent the FIPS state code, while the final three digits signify the county's unique code within that state. For instance, 55025 corresponds to Dane County, Wisconsin. The first two digits - 55 - represent Wisconsin, and the last three digits - 025 - denote Dane County. Further information can be accessed at the "Federal Information Processing System (FIPS) Codes for States and Counties" resource below.

Abstract

A crosswalk dataset matching US ZIP codes to corresponding county codes

Documentation

The denominators used to calculate the address ratios are the ZIP code totals. When a ZIP is split by any of the other geographies, that ZIP code is duplicated in the crosswalk file.

**Example: **ZIP code 03870 is split by two different Census tracts, 33015066000 and 33015071000, which appear in the tract column. The ratio of residential addresses in the first ZIP-Tract record to the total number of residential addresses in the ZIP code is .0042 (.42%). The remaining residential addresses in that ZIP (99.58%) fall into the second ZIP-Tract record.

So, for example, if one wanted to allocate data from ZIP code 03870 to each Census tract located in that ZIP code, one would multiply the number of observations in the ZIP code by the residential ratio for each tract associated with that ZIP code.

https://redivis.com/fileUploads/4ecb405e-f533-4a5b-8286-11e56bb93368%3E" alt="">(Note that the sum of each ratio column for each distinct ZIP code may not always equal 1.00 (or 100%) due to rounding issues.)

County definition

In the United States, a county is an administrative or political subdivision of a state that consists of a geographic region with specific boundaries and usually some level of governmental authority. The term "county" is used in 48 U.S. states, while Louisiana and Alaska have functionally equivalent subdivisions called parishes and boroughs, respectively.

Further reading

The following article demonstrates how to more effectively use the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) United States Postal Service ZIP Code Crosswalk Files when working with disparate geographies.

Wilson, Ron and Din, Alexander, 2018. “Understanding and Enhancing the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s ZIP Code Crosswalk Files,” Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, Volume 20 Number 2, 277 – 294. URL: https://www.huduser.gov/portal/periodicals/cityscpe/vol20num2/ch16.pdf

Contact information

Questions regarding these crosswalk files can be directed to Alex Din with the subject line HUD-Crosswalks.

Acknowledgement

This dataset is taken from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) office: https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/usps_crosswalk.html#codebook

PRISM data converted into FIPS, ZIP Code, and census tract summaries in the USA Introduction: Parameter-elevation Regressions on Independent Slopes Model (PRISM) by PRISM Climate group Oregon State temperature, precipitation 4km daily weather variable grids that I have converted to daily county FIPS, ZIP Code, and census tract summaries for use in several papers. Available for download (see Data below) in RDS (compact) format. CSV available on request. In Python it is easy to load RDS files and much more compact files than CSVs too. Note that ZIP Code throughout is actually ZIP Code Tabulation Area (ZCTA), which was developed to overcome the difficulties in precisely defining the land area covered by each ZIP Code. Defining the extent of an area is necessary in order to tabulate census data for that area.

Asthma ED Visit Rates by ZIP

Counts and Rates by Age Group in California

By Health [source]

About this dataset

This dataset presents a comprehensive look into the prevalence of asthma among Californian residents in terms of emergency department visits. Using age-adjusted rates and county FIPS codes, it offers an accurate snapshot of the prevalence rates per 10,000 people and provides key insights into how this condition affects certain age groups by ZIP Code. With its easy to use associated map view, this dataset allows users to quickly gain deeper knowledge about this important health issue and craft meaningful solutions to address it

More Datasets

For more datasets, click here.

Featured Notebooks

• 🚨 Your notebook can be here! 🚨!

How to use the dataset

This dataset contains counts and rates of asthma related emergency department visits by ZIP Code and age group in California. This data can be useful when doing research on asthma related trends or attempting to find correlations between environmental factors, prevalence of disease and geography.

• Select a year for analysis - the latest year for which data is available is the default selection, but other years are also listed in the dropdown menu.
• Select an Age Group to analyze - use the provided dropdown menus to select one or more age groups (all ages, 0-17, 18+) if you wish to analyze two different age groups in your analysis.
• Define a geographical area by selecting a ZIP code or County Fips code from which you wish to obtain your dataset from based on its availability or importance in your research question .
• View and download relevant data - after selecting all of the desired criteria (year,Age group(s), ZIP code/County FIPS Code) click “View Data” then “Download” at the bottom right corner of window that opens up
  5 Analyze information found - use software such as Microsoft Excel or open source programs like Openoffice Calc to gain insight into your downloaded dataset through statistics calculations, graphs etc.. In particular look out for anomalies that could signify further investigation

Research Ideas

• Identifying the geographic clusters of asthma sufferers by analyzing the rate of emergency department visits with geographic mapping.
• Developing outreach initiatives to areas with a high rate of ED visits for asthma to provide education, interventions and resources designed towards increasing preventive care and reducing preventable complications due to lack of access or knowledge about available services in these communities.
• Assessing disparities in ED visit rates for asthma between age groups as well as between urban and rural areas or different socio-economic groups within counties or ZIP codes in order to identify areas where there is a need for increased interventions, services and other resources related to asthma care in order to reduce the burden or severity of this chronic condition among particularly vulnerable population groups

Acknowledgements

If you use this dataset in your research, please credit the original authors. Data Source

License

License: Open Database License (ODbL) v1.0 - You are free to: - Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. - Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. - You must: - Give appropriate credit - Provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. - ShareAlike - You must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. - Keep intact - all notices that refer to this license, including copyright notices. - No Derivatives - If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material. - No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Columns

File: Asthma_Emergency_Department_Visit_Rates_by_ZIP_Code.csv | Column name | Description | |:----------------------|:------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Year | The year the data was collected. (Integer) | | ZIP code | The ZIP code of the area the data was collected from. (String...

Region codes of countries, dependencies, areas of special sovereignty, and their principal administrative divisions

The U.S. Census Bureau TIGER/Line® files in this data collection were originally distributed by the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) through its TIGER/Line file web site, which was decommissioned in 2018 (archived version: https://web.archive.org/web/20090924181858/http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/TIGER/index.html). There, users could download various versions of the U.S. Census Bureau's TIGER (Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing) database. The TIGER/Line files do not include demographic data, but they do contain geographic information that can be linked to the Census Bureau’s demographic data. Due to file number limitations in openICPSR, the original data collections have been bundled into single zip packages. A single TIGER_directory.txt file listing the original files and the original directory structure is included with the root directory. Documentation files are also included as standalone subdirectories in each collection so users do not need to download entire zip bundles to view documentation. The TIGER/Line data are stored in compressed format in subdirectories by state name. There is one TIGER/Line file (in a compressed format) for each county or county equivalent. The file names consist of TGR + the 2-digit state FIPS (Federal Information Processing Standards) code + the 3-digit county FIPS code (i.e. TGR01031.ZIP for Coffee County, Alabama). Each state folder contains individual county files.The individual county files include one file for each record type included for that county with the following name convention: tgr01031.rt1. The convention follows the order described above with each file having a suffix which includes 'rt' (record type) followed by its designation (in this case record type 1). Each county file also contains its own metadata record.If present, documentation files for the TIGER/Line data are stored in a directory named '0docs' which is located in the 'Parent Directory'. This directory appears at the top of the index of state subdirectories for each edition of the TIGER/Line files. The documentation includes a complete list of FIPS state and county codes.

This dataset contains a listing of incorporated places (cities and towns) and counties within the United States including the GNIS code, FIPS code, name, entity type and primary point (location) for the entity. The types of entities listed in this dataset are based on codes provided by the U.S. Census Bureau, and include the following: C1 - An active incorporated place that does not serve as a county subdivision equivalent; C2 - An active incorporated place legally coextensive with a county subdivision but treated as independent of any county subdivision; C3 - A consolidated city; C4 - An active incorporated place with an alternate official common name; C5 - An active incorporated place that is independent of any county subdivision and serves as a county subdivision equivalent; C6 - An active incorporated place that partially is independent of any county subdivision and serves as a county subdivision equivalent or partially coextensive with a county subdivision but treated as independent of any county subdivision; C7 - An incorporated place that is independent of any county; C8 - The balance of a consolidated city excluding the separately incorporated place(s) within that consolidated government; C9 - An inactive or nonfunctioning incorporated place; H1 - An active county or statistically equivalent entity; H4 - A legally defined inactive or nonfunctioning county or statistically equivalent entity; H5 - A census areas in Alaska, a statistical county equivalent entity; and H6 - A county or statistically equivalent entity that is areally coextensive or governmentally consolidated with an incorporated place, part of an incorporated place, or a consolidated city.

From https://www.census.gov/hhes/commuting/data/jtw_workerflow.html as of March 29, 2017:These files were compiled from STF-S-5, Census of Population 1990: Number of Workers by County of Residence by County of Work [http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06123.v1]. For the six New England States (CT, ME, MA, NH, RI, VT), data are provided for Minor Civil Divisions (MCDs) instead of for counties.For any State, or for the entire nation, there are four files to choose from, depending on the sort order and format you may find most useful.The sort order refers to whether the county of residence or the county of work is the main focus. If you are most interested in the number of people who live in a county, and want to know where they go to work, you should download one of the files sorted by county of residence. These files will show you all the work destinations for people who live in each county.On the other hand, if you are most interested in the people who work in a county, and want to know where they come from, you should download one of the files sorted by county of work. These files will show you all the origins for people who work in each county.The files have also been created in two formats: DBF and ASCII. The DBF files are directly accessible by a number of database, spreadsheet, and geographic information system programs. The ASCII files are more general purpose and may be imported into many software applications.Record Layouts Record Layout for ASCII (Plain Text) Files [TXT - 2K] coxcoasc.txtRecord Layout for DBF Files [TXT - 2K]coxcodbf.txtThe link to the FIPS Lookup File [ed.: absent when archived] can be used to access a list of FIPS State codes and the corresponding State names. In the county-to-county worker flow files, only the State codes are used. The files do not contain State names.United States county-to-county worker flow files: 1990 Residence County USresco.txt USresco.zip USresco.dbf USresco.dbf.zipWork County USwrkco.txt USwrkco.zip USwrkco.dbf USwrkco.dbf.zip [Ed.: the original site also had state files. These were not downloaded, as they simply split the United States file into smaller chunks.]

The Bureau of the Census has released Census 2000 Summary File 1 (SF1) 100-Percent data. The file includes the following population items: sex, age, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, household relationship, and household and family characteristics. Housing items include occupancy status and tenure (whether the unit is owner or renter occupied). SF1 does not include information on incomes, poverty status, overcrowded housing or age of housing. These topics will be covered in Summary File 3. Data are available for states, counties, county subdivisions, places, census tracts, block groups, and, where applicable, American Indian and Alaskan Native Areas and Hawaiian Home Lands. The SF1 data are available on the Bureau's web site and may be retrieved from American FactFinder as tables, lists, or maps. Users may also download a set of compressed ASCII files for each state via the Bureau's FTP server. There are over 8000 data items available for each geographic area. The full listing of these data items is available here as a downloadable compressed data base file named TABLES.ZIP. The uncompressed is in FoxPro data base file (dbf) format and may be imported to ACCESS, EXCEL, and other software formats. While all of this information is useful, the Office of Community Planning and Development has downloaded selected information for all states and areas and is making this information available on the CPD web pages. The tables and data items selected are those items used in the CDBG and HOME allocation formulas plus topics most pertinent to the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS), the Consolidated Plan, and similar overall economic and community development plans. The information is contained in five compressed (zipped) dbf tables for each state. When uncompressed the tables are ready for use with FoxPro and they can be imported into ACCESS, EXCEL, and other spreadsheet, GIS and database software. The data are at the block group summary level. The first two characters of the file name are the state abbreviation. The next two letters are BG for block group. Each record is labeled with the code and name of the city and county in which it is located so that the data can be summarized to higher-level geography. The last part of the file name describes the contents . The GEO file contains standard Census Bureau geographic identifiers for each block group, such as the metropolitan area code and congressional district code. The only data included in this table is total population and total housing units. POP1 and POP2 contain selected population variables and selected housing items are in the HU file. The MA05 table data is only for use by State CDBG grantees for the reporting of the racial composition of beneficiaries of Area Benefit activities. The complete package for a state consists of the dictionary file named TABLES, and the five data files for the state. The logical record number (LOGRECNO) links the records across tables.

This archive reproduces a figure titled "Figure 3.2 Boone County population distribution" from Wang and vom Hofe (2007, p.60). The archive provides a Jupyter Notebook that uses Python and can be run in Google Colaboratory. The workflow uses the Census API to retrieve data, reproduce the figure, and ensure reproducibility for anyone accessing this archive.The Python code was developed in Google Colaboratory, or Google Colab for short, which is an Integrated Development Environment (IDE) of JupyterLab and streamlines package installation, code collaboration, and management. The Census API is used to obtain population counts from the 2000 Decennial Census (Summary File 1, 100% data). Shapefiles are downloaded from the TIGER/Line FTP Server. All downloaded data are maintained in the notebook's temporary working directory while in use. The data and shapefiles are stored separately with this archive. The final map is also stored as an HTML file.The notebook features extensive explanations, comments, code snippets, and code output. The notebook can be viewed in a PDF format or downloaded and opened in Google Colab. References to external resources are also provided for the various functional components. The notebook features code that performs the following functions:install/import necessary Python packagesdownload the Census Tract shapefile from the TIGER/Line FTP Serverdownload Census data via CensusAPI manipulate Census tabular data merge Census data with TIGER/Line shapefileapply a coordinate reference systemcalculate land area and population densitymap and export the map to HTMLexport the map to ESRI shapefileexport the table to CSVThe notebook can be modified to perform the same operations for any county in the United States by changing the State and County FIPS code parameters for the TIGER/Line shapefile and Census API downloads. The notebook can be adapted for use in other environments (i.e., Jupyter Notebook) as well as reading and writing files to a local or shared drive, or cloud drive (i.e., Google Drive).

Carbon County, Pennsylvania's ZIP Codes, as of April 24, 2020

Unpublished data product not for circulation Persistent Poverty tracts*Persistent poverty area and enduring poverty area measures with reference year 2015-2019 are research measures only. The ERS offical measures are updated every ten years. The next updates will use 1960 through 2000 Decennial Census data and 2007-2011 and 2017-2021 5-year ACS estimates. The updates will take place following the Census Bureau release of the 2017-2021 estimates (anticipated December 2022).A reliability index is calculated for each poverty rate (PctPoor) derived using poverty count estimates and published margins of error from the 5-yr ACS. If the poverty rate estimate has low reliability (=3) AND the upper (PctPoor + derived MOE) or lower (PctPoor - derived MOE) bounds of the MOE adjusted poverty rate would change the poverty status of the estimate (high = 20.0% or more; extreme = 40.0% or more) then the county/tract type is coded as "N/A". If looking at metrics named "PerPov0711" and PerPov1519" ERS says: The official measure ending in 2007-11 included data from 1980. The research measure ending in 2015-19 drops 1980 and begins instead with 1990. There were huge differences in geographic coverage of census tracts and data quality between 1980 and 1990, namely "because tract geography wasn’t assigned to all areas of the country until the 1990 Decennial Census. Last date edited 9/1/2022Variable NamesVariable Labels and ValuesNotesGeographic VariablesGEO_ID_CTCensus download GEOID when downloading county and tract data togetherSTUSABState Postal AbbreviationfipsCounty FIPS code, in numericCountyNameArea Name (county, state)TractNameArea Name (tract, county, state)TractCensus Tract numberRegionCensus region numeric code 1 = Northeast 2 = Midwest 3 = South 4 = Westsubreg3ERS subregions 1 = Northeast and Great Lakes 2 = Eastern Metropolitan Belt 3 = Eastern and Interior Uplands 4 = Corn Belt 5 = Southeastern Coast 6 = Southern Coastal Plain 7 = Great Plains 8 = Rio Grande and Southwest 9 = West, Alaska and HawaiiMetNonmet2013Metro and nonmetro county code 0 = nonmetro county 1 = metro countyBeale2013ERS Rural-urban Continuum Code 2013 (counties) 1 = counties in metro area of 1 million population or more 2 = counties in metro area of 250,000 to 1 million population 3 = counties in metro area of fewer than 250,000 population 4 = urban population of 20,000 or more, adjacent to a metro area 5 = urban population of 20,000 or more, not adjacent to a metro area 6 = urban population of 2,500 to 19,999, adjacent to a metro area 7 = urban population of 2,500 to 19,999, not adjacent to a metro area 8 = completely rural or less than 2,500, adjacent to a metro area 9 = completely rural or less than 2,500, not adjacent to a metro areaRUCA_2010Rural Urban Commuting Areas, primary code (census tracts) 1 = Metropolitan area core: primary flow within an urbanized area (UA) 2 = Metropolitan area high commuting: primary flow 30% or more to a UA 3 = Metropolitan area low commuting: primary flow 10% to 30% to a UA 4 = Micropolitan area core: primary flow within an Urban Cluster of 10,000 to 49,999 (large UC) 5 = Micropolitan high commuting: primary flow 30% or more to a large UC 6 = Micropolitan low commuting: primary flow 10% to 30% to a large UC 7 = Small town core: primary flow within an Urban Cluster of 2,500 to 9,999 (small UC) 8 = Small town high commuting: primary flow 30% or more to a small UC 9 = Small town low commuting: primary flow 10% to 30% to a small UC 10 = Rural areas: primary flow to a tract outside a UA or UC 99 = Not coded: Census tract has zero population and no rural-urban identifier informationBNA01Census tract represents block numbering areas; BNAs are small statistical subdivisions of a county for numbering and grouping blocks in nonmetropolitan counties where local committees have not established tracts. 0 = not a BNA tract 1 = BNA tractPoverty Areas MeasuresHiPov60Poverty Rate greater than or equal to 20.0% 1960 (counties only) -1 = N/A 0 = PctPoor60 < 20.0% 1 = PctPoor60 >= 20.0%HiPov70Poverty Rate greater than or equal to 20.0% 1970 -1 = N/A 0 = PctPoor70 < 20.0% 1 = PctPoor70 >= 20.0%HiPov80Poverty Rate greater than or equal to 20.0% 1980 -1 = N/A 0 = PctPoor80 < 20.0% 1 = PctPoor80 >= 20.0%HiPov90Poverty Rate greater than or equal to 20.0% 1990 -1 = N/A 0 = PctPoor90 < 20.0% 1 = PctPoor90 >= 20.0%HiPov00Poverty Rate greater than or equal to 20.0% 2000 -1 = N/A 0 = PctPoor00 < 20.0% 1 = PctPoor00 >= 20.0%HiPov0711Poverty Rate greater than or equal to 20.0% 2007-11 ACS -1 = N/A 0 = PctPoor0711 < 20.0% 1 = PctPoor0711 >= 20.0%HiPov1519Poverty Rate greater than or equal to 20.0% 2015-19 ACS -1 = N/A 0 = PctPoor1519 < 20.0% 1 = PctPoor1519 >= 20.0%ExtPov60Poverty Rate greater than or equal to 40.0% 1960 (counties only) -1 = N/A 0 = PctPoor60 < 40.0% 1 = PctPoor60 >= 40.0%ExtPov70Poverty Rate greater than or equal to 40.0% 1970 -1 = N/A 0 = PctPoor70 < 40.0% 1 = PctPoor70 >= 40.0%ExtPov80Poverty Rate greater than or equal to 40.0% 1980 -1 = N/A 0 = PctPoor80 < 40.0% 1 = PctPoor80 >= 40.0%ExtPov90Poverty Rate greater than or equal to 40.0% 1990 -1 = N/A 0 = PctPoor90 < 40.0% 1 = PctPoor90 >= 40.0%ExtPov00Poverty Rate greater than or equal to 40.0% 2000 -1 = N/A 0 = PctPoor00 < 40.0% 1 = PctPoor00 >= 40.0%ExtPov0711Poverty Rate greater than or equal to 40.0% 2007-11 ACS -1 = N/A 0 = PctPoor0711 < 40.0% 1 = PctPoor0711 >= 40.0%ExtPov1519Poverty Rate greater than or equal to 40.0% 2015-19 ACS -1 = N/A 0 = PctPoor1519 < 40.0% 1 = PctPoor1519 >= 40.0%PerPov90Official ERS Measure: Persistent Poverty 1990: poverty rate >= 20.0% in 1960, 1970, 1980, and 1990 (counties only) May not match previously published versions due to changes in geographic normalization procedures. -1 = N/A 0 = poverty rate not >= 20.0% in 1960, 1970, 1980, and 1990 1 = poverty rate >= 20.0% in 1960, 1970, 1980, and 1990PerPov00Official ERS Measure: Persistent Poverty 2000: poverty rate >= 20.0% in 1970, 1980, 1990, and 2000May not match previously published versions due to changes in geographic normalization procedures. -1 = N/A 0 = poverty rate not >= 20.0% in 1970, 1980, 1990, and 2000 1 = poverty rate >= 20.0% in 1970, 1980, 1990, and 2000PerPov0711Official ERS Measure: Persistent Poverty 2007-11: poverty rate >= 20.0% in 1980, 1990, 2000, and 2007-11May not match previously published versions due to changes in geographic normalization procedures and -1 = N/A application of reliability criteria. 0 = poverty rate not >= 20.0% in 1980, 1990, 2000, and 2007-11 1 = poverty rate >= 20.0% in 1980, 1990, 2000, and 2007-11PerPov1519Research Measure Only: Persistent Poverty 2015-19: poverty rate >= 20.0% in 1990, 2000, 2007-11, and 2015May not match previously published versions due to changes in geographic normalization procedures and -1 = N/A application of reliability criteria. 0 = poverty rate not >= 20.0% in 1990, 2000, 2007-11, and 2015-19 1 = poverty rate >= 20.0% in 1990, 2000, 2007-11, and 2015-19EndurePov0711Official ERS Measure: Enduring Poverty 2007-11: poverty rate >= 20.0% for at least 5 consecutive time periods up-to and including 2007-11 -1 = N/A 0 = Poverty Rate not >=20.0% in 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000, and 2007-11 1 = poverty rate >= 20.0% in 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000, and 2007-11 2 = poverty rate >=20.0% in 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000, and 2007-11 (counties only)EndurePov1519Research Measure Only: Enduring Poverty 2015-19: poverty rate >= 20.0% for at least 5 consecutive time periods, up-to and including 2015-19 -1 = N/A 0 = Poverty Rate not >=20.0% in 1980, 1990, 2000, 2007-11, and 2015-19 1 = poverty rate >= 20.0% in 1980, 1990, 2000, 2007-11, and 2015-19 2 = poverty rate >= 20.0% in 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000, 2007-11, and 2015-19 3 = poverty rate >=20.0% in 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000, 2007-11, and 2015-19 (counties only)Additional Notes: *In the combined data tab each variable ends with a 'C' for county and a 'T' for tractThe spreadsheet was joined to Esri's Living Atlas Social Vulnerability Tract Data (CDC) and therefore contains the following information as well: ATSDR’s Geospatial Research, Analysis & Services Program (GRASP) has created a tool to help emergency response planners and public health officials identify and map the communities that will most likely need support before, during, and after a hazardous event. The Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) uses U.S. Census data to determine the social vulnerability of every county and tract. CDC SVI ranks each county and tract on 15 social factors, including poverty, lack of vehicle access, and crowded housing, and groups them into four related themes:SocioeconomicHousing Composition and DisabilityMinority Status and LanguageHousing and TransportationThis feature layer visualizes the 2018 overall SVI for U.S. counties and tracts. Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) indicates the relative vulnerability of every U.S. county and tract.15 social factors grouped into four major themes | Index value calculated for each county for the 15 social factors, four major themes, and the overall rank

2024 Primary & General Elections VTDs Voting Tabulation Districts (VTDs), the census geographic equivalent of county election precincts, are created for the purpose of relating 2020 Census population data to election precinct data. VTDs can differ from actual election precincts because precincts do not always follow census geography. The VTDs currently included in the redistricting database closely correspond to the precincts in effect for the 2024 primary and general elections. On the occasion that a precinct is in two noncontiguous pieces, it is a suffixed VTD in the database. For example, if precinct 0001 had two non-contiguous areas, the corresponding VTD would be VTD 0001A and VTD 0001B. If an election precinct does not match any census geography, it is consolidated with an adjacent precinct and given that precinct's corresponding VTD number. There are 9,712 VTDs in the 2024 primary & general elections VTDs shapefile. GIS users can join the council's redistricting election datasets to the 2024 primary & general elections VTDs shapefile in this directory. Use the common field name 'VTDKEY' to join the data. GIS users can join 2020 Census population data (VTDs_24PG_Pop.zip) to the 2024 primary & general elections VTDs shapefile in this directory. Use the common field name 'VTDKEY' to join the data. The VTDs shapefile (.shp) is in a compressed file (.zip) format: VTDs_24PG.zip - 2024 Primary & General Elections VTDs CNTY (num) - County FIPS Census code COLOR (num) - Color assignment for symbology VTD (txt) - VTD name (2024 general election) CNTYKEY (num) - Unique code used to join to geographic data VTDKEY (num) - Unique code used to join to geographic data CNTYVTD (txt) - Unique code used to join geographic data (CNTYKEY + VTD) The population data file contains the 2020 Census population by VTD as comma-separated values: VTDs_24PG_Pop.zip (.txt file in compressed format) - 2024 primary & general elections VTD, 2020 Census population CountyFIPS (txt) - County FIPS Census Code County (txt) - County name CNTY (num) - County FIPS Census Code VTD (txt) - VTD name (2024 general election) CNTYVTD (txt) - Unique code used to join geographic data (CNTY + VTD) VTDKEY (num) - Unique code used to join to geographic data total (num) - Total Population

The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. Face refers to the areal (polygon) topological primitives that make up MTDB. A face is bounded by one or more edges; its boundary includes only the edges that separate it from other faces, not any interior edges contained within the area of the face. The Topological Faces Shapefile contains the attributes of each topological primitive face. Each face has a unique topological face identifier (TFID) value. Each face in the shapefile includes the key geographic area codes for all geographic areas for which the Census Bureau tabulates data for both the 2020 Census and the annual estimates and surveys. The geometries of each of these geographic areas can then be built by dissolving the face geometries on the appropriate key geographic area codes in the Topological Faces Shapefile.

Release Date: 2023-05-25.Release Schedule:..The CBP data in this file was released on April 27, 2023. The ZIP Code Business Patterns (ZBP) data was released on May 25, 2023...Key Table Information:..Beginning with reference year 2007, CBP and ZBP data are released using the Noise disclosure methodology to protect confidentiality. See Program Methodology for complete information on the coverage and methodology of the County Business Patterns and ZBP data series. .Includes only establishments with payroll...Four employment-size classes (1,000 to 1,499 employees, 1,500 to 2,499 employees, 2,500 to 4,999 employees, and 5,000 or more employees) are only available at the CSA, MSA, and county-levels...ZBP data by employment size class, shown at the 2-6 digit NAICS code levels only contains data on the number of establishments. ZBP data shown for NAICS code 00 (Total for all sectors) contains data on the number of establishments, total employment, first-quarter payroll, and annual payroll...For additional details regarding Congressional Districts, please see Program Methodology...Data Items and Other Identifying Records:..This table contains data classified by Legal Form of Organization (CBP U.S. and state level only) and employment size category of the establishment..Number of establishments..Annual payroll ($1,000).First-quarter payroll ($1,000).Number of employees during the pay period containing March 12.Noise range for annual payroll, first-quarter payroll, and number of employees during the pay period including March 12..Geography Coverage:..The data are shown at the U.S., State, County, Metropolitan/Micropolitan Statistical Areas, Combined Statistical Areas, 5-digit ZIP code, and Congressional District levels. Also available are data for the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the Island Areas (American Samoa, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands) at the state and county equivalent levels...Industry Coverage:..The data are shown at the 2- through 6- digit NAICS code levels for all sectors with published data, and for NAICS code 00 (Total for all sectors)...FTP Download:..Download the entire table at: https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/cbp/data/2021/CB2100CBP.zip..API Information:..County Business Patterns (CBP) data are housed in the County Business Patterns (CBP) API. For more information, see County Business Patterns and ZBP APIs...Methodology:..In accordance with U.S. Code, Title 13, Section 9, no data are published that would disclose the operations of an individual employer. The data are subject to nonsampling error such as errors of self-classification, as well as errors of response, nonreporting and coverage. Data users who create their own estimates using data from this file should cite the U.S. Census Bureau as the source of the original data only.. .To comply with disclosure avoidance guidelines, data rows with fewer than three contributing establishments are not presented. For detailed information about the methods used to collect and produce statistics, see https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/cbp/technical-documentation/methodology.html..Symbols:..D - Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual companies; data are included in higher level totals (used prior to 2017).G - Low noise; cell value was changed by less than 2 percent by the application of noise.H - Moderate noise; cell value was changed by 2 percent or more but less than 5 percent by the application of noise.J - High noise; cell value was changed by 5 percent or more by the application of noise.N - Not available or not comparable.S - Withheld because estimates did not meet publication standards.X - Not applicable.r - Revised (represented as superscript).For a complete list of symbols, see Glossary: Abbreviations and Symbols...Source:..U.S. Census Bureau, 2021 County Business Patterns..For more information about County Business Patterns, see the County Business Patterns website...Contact Information:..U.S. Census Bureau.Economy-Wide Statistics Division.Business Statistics Branch.(301)763-2580.ewd.county.business.patterns@census.gov

The 2006 Second Edition TIGER/Line files are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the Census TIGER database. The geographic coverage for a single TIGER/Line file is a county or statistical equivalent entity, with the coverage area based on the latest available governmental unit boundaries. The Census TIGER database represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts. However, each county-based TIGER/Line file is designed to stand alone as an independent data set or the files can be combined to cover the whole Nation. The 2006 Second Edition TIGER/Line files consist of line segments representing physical features and governmental and statistical boundaries. This shapefile represents the current 5-Digit Zip Code Tabulation Areas for Colfax County stored in the 2006 TIGER Second Edition dataset.

This dataset lists all open cases with code violations that pertain to land use, building, septic systems, and housing. Data is updated weekly. If you want to download the data, please click on the Export button and select the format you wish to use.

The dataset represents approximate Zip code boundaries in Westchester County. Data was downloaded from the U.S. Census Bureau 2020. The cartographic boundary files are simplified representations of selected geographic areas from the Census Bureau’s MAF/TIGER geographic database. These boundary files are specifically designed for small-scale thematic mapping. Some of the boundaries near CT were edited to match the state line. This is NOT official Postal Service data. The data was updated in August 2025.

This dataset contains all zip codes in Montgomery County. Zip codes are the postal delivery areas defined by USPS. Zip codes with mailboxes only are not included. As this is geographic data, SHP and KMZ formats are available for download.