This project consists of two datasets. The first is a GIS shapefile of Flint Community Schools that are open as of Fall 2016. The second is a GIS shapefile of City of Flint service line connections.

Map Flint - Feature Service layer(s) : ACS5YR 2013-2017 estimates for City of Flint, Michigan, USA by tract of Rooms.

Data Dictionary: https://mapflint.org/dictionaries/2017_Flint_by_tract_ACS5YR_Rooms_vars010_data_dictionary.pdf

Note: Layer(s) not initially visible and must be turned on.

This feature layer is an American Community Survey (ACS) estimate (U.S. Census Bureau) that is derived from the National Historical Geographic Information System (NHGIS) and has been customized for various Map Flint analyses and projects pertaining to the City of Flint, Genesee County, Michigan U.S.A. and other surrounding counties - e.g., counties and communities in the greater Flint vicinity that also overlap with the mission of the University of Michigan-Flint EDA University Center for Community and Economic Development. All NHGiS layers in Map Flint projects maintain the uniquely-valued GISJOIN geographic ID assigned by the NHGIS in order to work with multiple data sets.

For more information, visit https://mapflint.org

The Digital Geologic-GIS Map of Alibates Flint Quarries National Monument and Lake Meredith National Recreational Area and Vicinity, Texas is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) an ESRI file geodatabase (aflm_geology.gdb), a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage, and 3.) 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro 3.X map file (.mapx) file (aflm_geology.mapx) and individual Pro 3.X layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer). The OGC geopackage is supported with a QGIS project (.qgz) file. Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) a readme file (alfl_lamr_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (aflm_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (aflm_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the alfl_lamr_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. Google Earth software is available for free at: https://www.google.com/earth/versions/. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri.htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: Texas Water Development Board and Texas Bureau of Economic Geology, University of Texas at Austin. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (aflm_geology_metadata.txt or aflm_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:250,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 127 meters or 416.7 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS Pro, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).

Map Flint - Feature Service layer(s) : ACS5YR 2012-2016 estimates for City of Flint, Michigan, USA by tract of Tenure.

Data Dictionary: https://mapflint.org/dictionaries/2016_Flint_by_tract_ACS5YR_Tenure_vars003_data_dictionary.pdf

Note: Layer(s) not initially visible and must be turned on.

This feature layer is an American Community Survey (ACS) estimate (U.S. Census Bureau) that is derived from the National Historical Geographic Information System (NHGIS) and has been customized for various Map Flint analyses and projects pertaining to the City of Flint, Genesee County, Michigan U.S.A. and other surrounding counties - e.g., counties and communities in the greater Flint vicinity that also overlap with the mission of the University of Michigan-Flint EDA University Center for Community and Economic Development. All NHGiS layers in Map Flint projects maintain the uniquely-valued GISJOIN geographic ID assigned by the NHGIS in order to work with multiple data sets.

For more information, visit https://mapflint.org

Map Flint - Feature Service layer(s) : ACS5YR 2011-2015 estimates for City of Flint, Michigan, USA by block group of Median Gross Rent.

Data Dictionary: https://mapflint.org/dictionaries/2015_Flint_by_bg_ACS5YR_Median_Gross_Rent_vars001_data_dictionary.pdf

Note: Layer(s) not initially visible and must be turned on.

This feature layer is an American Community Survey (ACS) estimate (U.S. Census Bureau) that is derived from the National Historical Geographic Information System (NHGIS) and has been customized for various Map Flint analyses and projects pertaining to the City of Flint, Genesee County, Michigan U.S.A. and other surrounding counties - e.g., counties and communities in the greater Flint vicinity that also overlap with the mission of the University of Michigan-Flint EDA University Center for Community and Economic Development. All NHGiS layers in Map Flint projects maintain the uniquely-valued GISJOIN geographic ID assigned by the NHGIS in order to work with multiple data sets.

For more information, visit https://mapflint.org

Flint_Government_Facilities

Flint, Place Based Land Use

Link to the ScienceBase Item Summary page for the item described by this metadata record. Service Protocol: Link to the ScienceBase Item Summary page for the item described by this metadata record. Application Profile: Web Browser. Link Function: information

Railroad Lines dataset current as of 2006. Chattahoochee-Flint Regional Data Railroads Shapefile.

Map Flint - Feature Service layer(s) : ACS5YR 2013-2017 estimates for City of Flint, Michigan, USA by block group of Median Household Income.

Data Dictionary: https://mapflint.org/dictionaries/2017_Flint_by_bg_ACS5YR_Median_Household_Income_vars001_data_dictionary.pdf

Note: Layer(s) not initially visible and must be turned on.

This feature layer is an American Community Survey (ACS) estimate (U.S. Census Bureau) that is derived from the National Historical Geographic Information System (NHGIS) and has been customized for various Map Flint analyses and projects pertaining to the City of Flint, Genesee County, Michigan U.S.A. and other surrounding counties - e.g., counties and communities in the greater Flint vicinity that also overlap with the mission of the University of Michigan-Flint EDA University Center for Community and Economic Development. All NHGiS layers in Map Flint projects maintain the uniquely-valued GISJOIN geographic ID assigned by the NHGIS in order to work with multiple data sets.

For more information, visit https://mapflint.org

The information in the abstract is translated from the archaeological report: During August 2003, the County Museum of Östergötland performed an archaeological assessment (phase 1) in the Källhem area, by request of Linköping municipality and due to planned house construction work. Two areas (Object 1 and 2), that were likely to contain archaeological remains, were identified. During phase 2 of the assessment, search trenches were dug within these areas. Within Object 1, one sole post hole was discovered. Within Object 2,162 settlement features such as pits, post holes, hearths and cultural layers were discovered, as well as stray finds consisting of flint, quartz, burnt bones and slag. Features were found all over the area of Object 2 and the settlement is likely to continue to the north-west, outside this area. The County Museum of Östergötland suggests that a field evaluation is performed before this area is developed. There are also two known ancient monuments within Object 2, RAÄ 122 and 46. The area containing these monuments will not be developed and has thus not been surveyed (in phase 2 of the assessment).

Purpose:

The information in the purpose is translated from the archaeological report: The purpose of the assessment was to investigate whether any ancient monuments were going to be affected by the local plan. The results of the assessment were to form the basis of future decisions by the County Administrative Board, regarding the archaeological remnants, and serve as guidance in the further local planning.

The ZIP file consist of GIS files with information about the excavations, findings and other metadata about the archaeological survey.

Land_Bank_Properties_and_2012_FCs_Flint_6-27-12

Parcels and Land Ownership dataset current as of 2008. Mount Zion, Future Development Map.

Parcels and Land Ownership dataset current as of 2004. Manchester, Georgia Parcel Shapefile.

Parcels and Land Ownership dataset current as of 2007. Luthersville, Georgia Zoning map..

Map Flint - Feature Service layer(s) : ACS5YR 2013-2017 estimates for City of Flint, Michigan, USA by block group of Travel Time to Work.

Data Dictionary: https://mapflint.org/dictionaries/2017_Flint_by_bg_ACS5YR_Travel_Time_to_Work_vars013_data_dictionary.pdf

Note: Layer(s) not initially visible and must be turned on.

This feature layer is an American Community Survey (ACS) estimate (U.S. Census Bureau) that is derived from the National Historical Geographic Information System (NHGIS) and has been customized for various Map Flint analyses and projects pertaining to the City of Flint, Genesee County, Michigan U.S.A. and other surrounding counties - e.g., counties and communities in the greater Flint vicinity that also overlap with the mission of the University of Michigan-Flint EDA University Center for Community and Economic Development. All NHGiS layers in Map Flint projects maintain the uniquely-valued GISJOIN geographic ID assigned by the NHGIS in order to work with multiple data sets.

For more information, visit https://mapflint.org

Parcels and Land Ownership dataset current as of 2006. Heard County, Georgia Zoning Map.

Sewerage Collection Lines dataset current as of 2008. MFRDC has sewer lines for some of the counties and cities..

Demographic Data dataset current as of 2005. Meriwether County, Georgia Poverty Concentration Map.

description: This dataset contains several memos describing geothermal targets outlined by Flint personnel in Colorado. Phase 1 involved an ASTER and LANDSAT thermal infrared imagery assessment conducted by CIRES of the University of Colorado, which identified areas of warm ground that might indicate geothermal heating. CIRES used the thermal ground anomalies, together with other GIS layers, to come up with a set of areas ("polygons") having high geothermal potential. This was followed by a "ground truthing" or site assessment by Geothermal Development Associates of Reno Nevada, during the summer and fall of 2011. Of the many areas targeted and visited, several stood out for their overall geothermal potential. In the first memo, "Colorado Targets", GDA's Richard "Rick" Zehner describes the geothermal geology of the following properties, which were deemed to have the highest geothermal potential: 1. Routt (aka Strawberry Park) Hot Springs in Routt County; 2. Rico area, Delores County; 3. Pagosa Springs, Archuleta County; 4. San Luis Valley, Alamosa and Conejos Counties; 5. Lemon Hot Springs, San Miguel County The second memo, "Comments on Rick's Report", from CIRES investigators, is a critical evaluation of Zehner's memo, in relation to CIRES' satellite thermal anomaly maps. The third memo, "Penrose Area" is a detailed description of preliminary investigations into the geothermal potential of that area in Fremont County.; abstract: This dataset contains several memos describing geothermal targets outlined by Flint personnel in Colorado. Phase 1 involved an ASTER and LANDSAT thermal infrared imagery assessment conducted by CIRES of the University of Colorado, which identified areas of warm ground that might indicate geothermal heating. CIRES used the thermal ground anomalies, together with other GIS layers, to come up with a set of areas ("polygons") having high geothermal potential. This was followed by a "ground truthing" or site assessment by Geothermal Development Associates of Reno Nevada, during the summer and fall of 2011. Of the many areas targeted and visited, several stood out for their overall geothermal potential. In the first memo, "Colorado Targets", GDA's Richard "Rick" Zehner describes the geothermal geology of the following properties, which were deemed to have the highest geothermal potential: 1. Routt (aka Strawberry Park) Hot Springs in Routt County; 2. Rico area, Delores County; 3. Pagosa Springs, Archuleta County; 4. San Luis Valley, Alamosa and Conejos Counties; 5. Lemon Hot Springs, San Miguel County The second memo, "Comments on Rick's Report", from CIRES investigators, is a critical evaluation of Zehner's memo, in relation to CIRES' satellite thermal anomaly maps. The third memo, "Penrose Area" is a detailed description of preliminary investigations into the geothermal potential of that area in Fremont County.