Quick Stats is the National Agricultural Statistics Service's (NASS) online, self-service tool to access complete results from the 1997, 2002, 2007, and 2012 Censuses of Agriculture as well as the best source of NASS survey published estimates. The census collects data on all commodities produced on U.S. farms and ranches, as well as detailed information on expenses, income, and operator characteristics. The surveys that NASS conducts collect information on virtually every facet of U.S. agricultural production.

Abstract

The objective of the GAPS is to strengthen the Multi-Round Annual Crop and Livestock Surveys (MRACLS) that the ministry implements through SRID. The MRACLS is the national agricultural survey on the basis of which SRID releases information on agricultural production and yields of important crops. The ultimate goal of GAPS is to provide more accurate and timely agricultural production estimates at the district, regional, and national levels. The survey is also to offer an opportunity for SRID to experiment with a number of potential improvements with a view to developing the required skills and competencies before scaling up, over time, to all the districts in the country.

As part of the terms of implementing GAPS, MoFA agreed to assign four Agriculture Extension Agents (AEAs) per district for data collection. The Agents were relieved from all extension duties. To distinguish these field data collection officers from other extension agents, they were referred to as District Agricultural Statistical Assistants (DASAs). One officer per district was designated as a District Management Information System (MIS) officer and was given additional responsibility as field supervisor and referred to as District Agricultural Statistical Officer (DASO). A total of 100 DASAs and DASOs were successfully trained and deployed to their districts for GAPS implementation and given the task of collecting and processing datafrom the field.

Geographic coverage

National Level Regions Districts

Analysis unit

Household

Universe

Agricultural household and holder

Kind of data

Census/enumeration data [cen]

Sampling procedure

The GAPS employed a three stage multi-sampling design in response to the Government of Ghana's requirement for reliable agricultural statistics at the national, regional and district levels.

· First Stage Sampling- Selection of 2 Districts from each of the 10 Regions. A total of 20 districts, 2 from each of the 10 regions were randomly selected with probability proportional to size, using districts' population in year 2000 as a measure of size.1. Eleven Metropolitan and Municipal Assemblies (Kumasi, Sunyani, Cape Coast, New Juaben, Accra, Tema, Tamale, Bolgatanga, Wa, Ho and Shama Ahanta East) were excluded from the study, given their urban predominance.

· Second Stage Sampling - Selection of 40 Enumeration Areas (EAs) from each of the 20 Districts. A total of 800 EAs was selected; 40 EAs were randomly selected with probability proportional to size in each district, using the list of EAs compiled by the 2010 Census as a sample frame, and projected total population as a measure of size.2 In the Kassena-Nankana East district, 53 of the 187 EAs compiled by the 2010 census were excluded from the study because of the land disputes prevalent in the area earlier in 2011.

· Third Stage Sampling - Selection of 5 holders At the third stage, five holders were randomly chosen in each EA, using as a sample frame; the full list of all holders, compiled from the Household and Holders Listing questionnaire. This provides a total sample of 4000 holders, consisting of 200 holders per district.

Sampling deviation

Not reported

Mode of data collection

Computer Assisted Personal Interview [capi]

Research instrument

The questionnaires used in the minor season survey include the followings:-

(a) The Household and Holding Inquiry - Pre-Harvest questionnaire, also known as the form 2a. This was used to make enquiries on the general characteristics of households and holdings for pre-harvest farming activities during the minor season. Information sought included changes in the household composition, detailed information on livestock, poultry and other animals owned by the selected holders, detailed information on tree crops grown by the selected holders, information on aquaculture practices, inputs, outputs and assets.

(b) The Household and Holding Inquiry - Post-Harvest questionnaire, also known as form 2b. This was used to make enquiries on field practices, inputs and outputs. The following information were sought: inventory of fields, inputs and expenses, Remaining major season production and marketing of crops, minor season crop production and marketing, holding information, shocks and adaptation to shocks, other income generating activities and household health status.

(c) The Household and Holding Inquiry - Pre-harvest field measurements questionnaire known as the form 3. This questionnaire was used to gather data on the nature and characteristics of crop fields and area measurements for individual crop fields for all selected holdings.

(d) Crop Yield Measurement questionnaire also known as the form 4. This was used to seek for data on the yields of food crops such as the cereals, root and tubers, plantain, legumes and nuts, and vegetables.

Cleaning operations

The set of questionnaires used in the minor season survey include:-

(a) The Household and Holding Inquiry – Pre-Harvest questionnaire, also known as the form 2a. This was used to make enquiries on the general characteristics of households and holdings for pre-harvest farming activities during the minor season. Information sought included changes in the household composition, detailed information on livestock, poultry and other animals owned by the selected holders, detailed information on tree crops grown by the selected holders, information on aquaculture practices, inputs, outputs and assets.

(b) The Household and Holding Inquiry – Post-Harvest questionnaire, also known as form 2b. This was used to make enquiries on field practices, inputs and outputs. The following information were sought: inventory of fields, inputs and expenses, Remaining major season production and marketing of crops, minor season crop production and marketing, holding information, shocks and adaptation to shocks, other income generating activities and household health status.

(c) The Household and Holding Inquiry – Pre-harvest field measurements questionnaire known as the form 3. This questionnaire was used to gather data on the nature and characteristics of crop fields and area measurements for individual crop fields for all selected holdings.

(d) Crop Yield Measurement questionnaire also known as the form 4. This was used to seek for data on the yields of food crops such as the cereals, root and tubers, plantain, legumes and nuts, and vegetables.

Response rate

The repond rate reported was 70%

Sampling error estimates

No estimates of sampling error given

Data appraisal

District information and communication infrastructure was upgraded in the 20 districts to improve data collection and management. Each office was provided with a computer, printer, voltage stabilizers, an internet modem, 5 GPS units, and other field equipment. Motorbikes were also provided to the DASAs to enhance mobility.

Similarly, the SRID head office was also upgraded with ICT equipment to facilitate work.To oversee the implementation of the pilot survey a cross-sectoral steering committee was established.

At the end of each phase of implementation, a team was put together to assess the institutional and financial feasibility of scaling up GAPS, and both assessment reports are available at SRID.

Monthly report on crop acreage, yield and production in major countries worldwide. Sources include reporting from FAS’s worldwide offices, official statistics of foreign governments, and analysis of economic data and satellite imagery.

Description

This dataset contains information on crops and livestock products, sourced from FAOSTAT. It provides data for various countries and regions, covering annual statistics on harvested area, yield, and production. Data includes item codes, measurement units, and additional metadata such as flags indicating data reliability (e.g., estimated or official figures). The dataset supports agricultural and economic research for food production analysis.

Attributes

• Domain: Type of products (e.g., Crops and Livestock).
• Area: Geographical region or country.
• Element: Data type (e.g., harvested area, yield, production).
• Item: Specific product or commodity.
• Year: Year of data collection.
• Unit: Measurement unit for the data value.
• Value: The actual statistical measurement.
• Flag Description: Data reliability or source type.

*The Item Code (CPC) in the dataset refers to a standardized code used to identify specific agricultural products or items. It is derived from the Central Product Classification (CPC) system, which is an international standard maintained by the United Nations. This system is used to classify goods and services for economic analysis.*

Purpose of CPC Codes

Identification:

Each product, such as "Almonds, in shell" or "Wheat," is assigned a unique CPC code.

Standardization:

Facilitates international comparability and harmonization of data.

Economic Analysis:

Supports tracking of production, trade, and consumption statistics globally.

Example from Dataset

For instance:

• Item Code (CPC): 01371
• Item: "Almonds, in shell"

The CPC code helps ensure consistent identification and analysis of "Almonds, in shell" across datasets and countries.

Collection Methodology of the Dataset

Crop Production Data

1. Data Types and Collection:

• Data is primarily collected for harvested areas, though for permanent crops, it may reflect planted areas.

• Yields are computed using detailed area and production data, with higher reliability for temporary crops compared to permanent crops (e.g., coffee and cocoa).

2. Specific Crops:

• Cereals:

Data only covers crops harvested for dry grain, excluding those harvested for hay or silage. The area data corresponds to harvested areas unless only sown or cultivated areas are reported.

• Vegetables:

Statistics often refer to field crops grown for sale, excluding small-scale household gardens.

• Fruit:

Data covers fresh fruit production for food or processing but excludes production from wild plants or scattered trees.

3. Estimation and Reliability:

• Data for non-reporting countries are estimated.
• Data collection is inconsistent across countries, leading to variations in coverage for certain crops and regions.

4. Sources:

• Governments provide data through national publications and FAO questionnaires.
• Supplemental data from unofficial sources and international organizations ensure broader coverage.

Livestock Production Data

1. Livestock Numbers: - Covers all domestic animals, regardless of age or breeding purpose. Estimates are included for non-reporting countries or incomplete data.

2. Dairy and Egg Production: - Milk production includes whole fresh milk, excluding milk consumed by young animals. - Egg data may be derived from poultry numbers and estimated laying rates in countries lacking direct statistics.

3. Sources and Reliability: - Governments contribute through annual FAO questionnaires. Incomplete data is supplemented with estimates based on available indicators.

Time Reference

• Data is organized by calendar year, though some countries report based on agricultural or marketing years. When necessary, adjustments align these periods to a standard calendar year.

Totals and Aggregation

• Continental and world totals include only countries in the dataset. Rounding and coverage differences may cause discrepancies.

Data Sources and Enhancements

• Official government reports, supplemented by data from national and international organizations, aim to ensure completeness. Unofficial data may be incorporated when official data is lacking.

This comprehensive approach ensures that the dataset reflects a broad and detailed view of global agricultural production, though some data inconsistencies and gaps are acknowledged.

No Endorsement:

*The FAO does not endorse any specific interpretation, use, or analysis of this data beyond the context of its intended use for research, policy analysis, and decision-making. The FAO d...

Snapshot img

Crop Production Software Market Size 2024-2028

The crop production software market size is forecast to increase by USD 2.22 billion at a CAGR of 17.59% between 2023 and 2028.

The agricultural market is experiencing substantial growth due to several notable trends and challenges. One notable trend is the increasing use of precision farming, which employs advanced technologies to optimize crop yields and reduce waste. Another significant development is the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) into crop production software. This innovation enables predictive analytics and the automation of farming processes, leading to improved efficiency and productivity. However, the substantial upfront capital investments required by farmers pose a significant barrier to market expansion. Despite this obstacle, the potential benefits of these technologies are compelling, making the agricultural sector an intriguing and dynamic area to monitor.

What will the size of the market be during the forecast period?

Request Free Sample

The agribusiness sector is witnessing significant advancements in crop production, driven by the global population's increasing demand for food and the challenges of urbanization, climate change, and the depletion of arable land. Sustainable agriculture solutions, such as precision farming, real-time data collection and analysis, predictive modeling, monitoring, and control, are becoming essential for optimizing food production.



Companies are pioneering the use of Satellite IoT (SatIoT) and sensors, actuators, and devices to create greenhouses and monitor microclimates. Government investments in satellite imaging, in-field sensors, artificial intelligence, and machine learning are also playing a crucial role in developing regions. The integration of drones and Internet of Things (IoT) devices into crop production software is revolutionizing planting schedules and enhancing overall productivity in the agricultural sector.

How is this market segmented and which is the largest segment?

The market research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD million' for the period 2024-2028, as well as historical data from 2018-2022 for the following segments.

Deployment

  On-premises
  Cloud


Type

  Small
  Medium
  Large


Geography

  North America

    US


  Europe

    Germany
    UK


  APAC

    China


  South America



  Middle East and Africa

By Deployment Insights

The on-premises segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.

Agribusinesses, farmers, ranchers, and growers worldwide are increasingly adopting crop production software to optimize food production in the face of global population growth, urbanization, climate change, and the need for sustainable agriculture. On-premises deployment of these solutions requires farmers to invest in hardware (servers, network equipment, security devices) and software, making it a significant upfront cost. However, the benefits include enhanced data security, real-time data collection and analysis, predictive modeling, monitoring, and control. Smart greenhouses utilize sensors, actuators, and devices to optimize microclimates, while Satellite IoT (SatIoT) and drones provide valuable data for precision farming.

Furthermore, in-field sensors, satellite imaging, and artificial intelligence enable advanced analytics and automation capabilities. Government investments in agriculture technology and cloud services facilitate the integration of mobile applications and data analysis tools. Despite the advantages, the high deployment costs may limit the adoption of on-premises crop production software, particularly in developing regions. However, the potential for increased efficiency, productivity, and profitability makes it an attractive option for agribusinesses and farmers alike.

Get a glance at the market report of share of various segments Request Free Sample

The on-premises segment was valued at USD 465.49 million in 2018 and showed a gradual increase during the forecast period.

Regional Analysis

North America is estimated to contribute 43% to the growth of the global market during the forecast period.

Technavio's analysts have elaborately explained the regional trends and drivers that shape the market during the forecast period.

For more insights on the market share of various regions, Request Free Sample

The market is experiencing significant growth due to the integration of advanced technologies in agriculture. High-speed imagery services are becoming increasingly crucial for farmers to monitor crop quality and resource use, leading to improved precision in agriculture. This, in turn, helps in reducing input costs and enhancing food security. Sustainability is a key focus area, with weather con

Abstract

The implementation of the Fifth General Census of Agriculture 2015 i.e. Recenseamento Geral da Agricultura (RGA-2015) is a the country's national priority in agricultural statistics. It falls within the National Strategy for the Development of Statistics 2012-2016 i.e. Estratégia Nacional de Desenvolvimento das Estatísticas (ENDE). It also takes into account the recommendations of the FAO, an entity of the UN System United Nations coordinator for agricultural statistics. The CA process will follow the FAO methodological framework (FAO, WCA 2010), which consists of a collection of the structural data of the agricultural sector which will serve as the sampling frame, being exhaustive and representative at the level of the municipalities. The aim of the CA 2015 is to provide an effective and efficient response to the needs of data on agricultural statistics which will make it possible to make available statistical information for the monitoring of national policy, the respect of the national and international commitments and the satisfaction of the needs of the different users. For these objectives to be achieved, it is necessary that there is a broad awareness and participation of the population and organisation at all levels.

Geographic coverage

National coverage

Analysis unit

Households

Universe

• The statistical unit was the agricultural holding, defined as an economic unit of agricultural production under single management, comprising all land used wholly or partly for agricultural production and all livestock kept, without regard to title, legal form or size.

• The agricultural holdings in both the household sector and the non-household sector were covered by the CA.

Kind of data

Census/enumeration data [cen]

Sampling procedure

i. Methodological modality for conducting the census A modular approach was adopted for conducting the CA. The core module was implemented in 2015. The supplementary modules (on "rain-fed crop production" and "food security") were implemented in 2017 and 2018 respectively.

ii. Frame The listing operation to identify the agricultural holdings was conducted during the census enumeration. The core module provided the frame for the follow-up supplementary modules.

iii. Sample design A two-stage sampling design was used for supplementary modules. The EAs were the PSUs and the households were the SSUs.

Mode of data collection

Computer Assisted Personal Interview [capi]

Research instrument

Two types of questionnaires were used for the core module, for the holdings in:

(i) the household sector

(ii) the non-household sector

Other two questionnaires (on "rain-fed crop production" and "food security") were used for the supplementary modules conducted in 2017-2018. The CA questionnaires covered 15 of the 16 core items4 recommended for the WCA 2010 round. All questionnaires are attached to external documents.

Cleaning operations

i. ENTRY A computer application was developed by the INS for data collection and processing. Core census module data were processed by the INS, in collaboration with the MAA and transmitted for tabulation and dissemination to the MAA.

i. CENSUS DATA QUALITY Quality checks were conducted by supervisors to assess the enumerators' work and to ensure the quality of census data. Consistency checks were incorporated into the data entry program to minimize data entry errors, inconsistencies and incomplete data. The use of CAPI enabled monitoring the mobility of the enumerators in the field.

The Quick Stats Database is the most comprehensive tool for accessing agricultural data published by the USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS). It allows you to customize your query by commodity, location, or time period. You can then visualize the data on a map, manipulate and export the results as an output file compatible for updating databases and spreadsheets, or save a link for future use. Quick Stats contains official published aggregate estimates related to U.S. agricultural production. County level data are also available via Quick Stats. The data include the total crops and cropping practices for each county, and breakouts for irrigated and non-irrigated practices for many crops, for selected States. The database allows custom extracts based on commodity, year, and selected counties within a State, or all counties in one or more States. The county data includes totals for the Agricultural Statistics Districts (county groupings) and the State. The download data files contain planted and harvested area, yield per acre and production. NASS develops these estimates from data collected through:

hundreds of sample surveys conducted each year covering virtually every aspect of U.S. agriculture

the Census of Agriculture conducted every five years providing state- and county-level aggregates Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Quick Stats database. File Name: Web Page, url: https://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/ Dynamic drill-down filtered search by Commodity, Location, and Date range, beginning with Census or Survey data. Filter lists are refreshed based upon user choice allowing the user to fine-tune the search.

Abstract

The main target of the FSS 2007 was to obtain information about structure and typology of the agricultural farms and their agricultural activities in Latvia in accordance with EU and national requirements.

Geographic coverage

National

Analysis unit

Farms

Universe

All economically active farms - farms, which produce agricultural production, were involved in the target population for the FSS 2007. The definition of a holding is in line with the EU Farm Structure Survey definition. Agricultural holding is a single unit both technically and economically, which has a single management and the output of which is agricultural production. The holding may also provide other supplementary (non-agricultural) products and services.

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

The Latvian farm structure survey 2007 was made as combination of exhaustive enumeration and sample. All units were sampled in the part of sampling frame where exhaustive enumeration was done. Stratified simple random sampling was done in the sampling part of the frame. For more details see 3.3.2 of the Methodological Report available as external resources.. For each farm structure survey new sample is drawn. Procedure for sample selection is self-made using SPSS®. In 2007 total sample size comprised 58.0 thousand holdings.

Mode of data collection

Face-to-face [f2f]

Research instrument

The questionnaire form of FSS 2007 was developed in co-operation with the Ministry of Agriculture and other State institutions concerned. The list of characteristics included in the survey was compliant with EU requirements concerning the Farm Structure Survey 2007 (Commission Regulation (EC) No 204/2006 of February 6, 2006 adapting Council Regulation (EEC) No 571/88 and amending Commission Decision No 2000/115/EC with a view to the organization of Community surveys on the structure of agriculture holdings in 2007).

For all types of farms (private farms, state farms and statutory companies) Latvia has only one type of questionnaire form. The questionnaire form of FSS 2007 was developed in co-operation with the Ministry of Agriculture and other State institutions concerned.The questionnaire form was designed so that later it can easily be processed on scanners. The size of the questionnaire form is 8 pages. The following parts are included: · General description of the farm and holder (user) · Land use · Utilisation of arable land · Number of livestock and poultry · Stock of agricultural machines · Farm storage facilities of manure and irrigation devices · Farm labour force, permanent and temporary · Rural development

Cleaning operations

Data Control of the FSS 2007 was carried out as follows: Manual Control: The first visual control of questionnaire forms was done in regional offices. Regional supervisory stuff and other staff in regional offices carried out a preliminary verification to see if the forms were filled in correctly and completely. Verification and Logical Control: For data entering scanners were used. After scanning the verification of the logical and arithmetical control was done in the CSB in accordance with specially developed verification programme. There were approximately 200 different logical and arithmetical controls. After interviewers or farmers were contacted by phone the re-addressing of errors was done. Due to the error shown by logical control program, if necessary, land users were contacted by phone in, e.g., to find out volume of sown areas, number of livestock, etc. thus needed information was obtained, and there non-response in such cases does not exist. Comparison of the FSS with other data sources: After logical control was finished, the FSS data were compared with information from Statistical Farm Register (information on holder (user) of farm, land areas belonging to farm and other), with information from other statistical surveys (previous livestock survey), with Animal Register information (Agricultural Data Centre) on June 1, 2007, and with the list of Organic farms received from Ministry of Agriculture and Integrated Administration an Control System – IACS (Rural Support Service)

Response rate

Details on non-response are available in section 3.4.5 of the Methodological Report available as external resources.

Sampling error estimates

Please see section 3.5.2 of the Methodological Report (available as external resources) for a detailed explanation procedure used to estimate sampling errors.

Data appraisal

Comparison of the FSS with other data sources: After logical control was finished, the FSS data were compared with information from Statistical Farm Register (information on holder (user) of farm, land areas belonging to farm and other), with information from other statistical surveys (previous livestock survey), with Animal Register information (Agricultural Data Centre) on June 1, 2007, and with the list of Organic farms received from Ministry of Agriculture and Integrated Administration an Control System - IACS (Rural Support Service).

International comparability Eurostat Statistical Office of the European Union (Eurostat) on its homepage published information on agriculture on EU-27 and on each country separately. Main indicators are available in section: Main tables/ Agriculture, forestry and fisheries/ Agriculture/ Structure of agricultural holdings. More detailed Farm Structure Data: Database/ Agriculture, forestry and fisheries/ Agriculture/ Structure of agricultural holdings. Eurostat has published reports on agriculture in EU countries on its webpage: Publications/ Collections/ Statistics in focus.

Abstract

The Annual Agricultural Sample Survey (AASS) for the year 2022/23 aimed to enhance the understanding of agricultural activities across Tanzania by collecting comprehensive data on various aspects of the agricultural sector. This survey is crucial for policy formulation, development planning, and service delivery, providing reliable data to monitor and evaluate national and international development frameworks.

The 2022/23 survey is particularly significant as it informs the monitoring and evaluation of key agricultural development strategies and frameworks. The collected data will contribute to the Tanzania Development Vision 2025, Zanzibar Development Vision 2020, the Five-Year Development Plan 2021/22–2025/26, the National Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty (NSGRP) known as MKUKUTA, and the Zanzibar Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty (ZSGRP) known as MKUZA. The survey data also supports the evaluation of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP). Key indicators for agricultural performance and poverty monitoring are directly measured from the survey data.

The 2022/23 AASS provides a detailed descriptive analysis and related tables on the main thematic areas. These areas include household members and holder identification, field roster, seasonal plot and crop rosters (Vuli, Masika, and Dry Season), permanent crop production, crop harvest use, seed and seedling acquisition, input use and acquisition (fertilizers and pesticides), livestock inventory and changes, livestock production costs, milk and eggs production, other livestock products, aquaculture production, and labor dynamics. The 2022/23 AASS offers an extensive dataset essential for understanding the current state of agriculture in Tanzania. The insights gained will support the development of policies and interventions aimed at enhancing agricultural productivity, sustainability, and the livelihoods of farming communities. This data is indispensable for stakeholders addressing challenges in the agricultural sector and promoting sustainable agricultural development.

STATISTICAL DISCLOSURE CONTROL (SDC) METHODS HAVE BEEN APPLIED TO THE MICRODATA, TO PROTECT THE CONFIDENTIALITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL DATA COLLECTED. USERS MUST BE AWARE THAT THESE ANONYMIZATION OR SDC METHODS MODIFY THE DATA, INCLUDING SUPPRESSION OF SOME DATA POINTS. THIS AFFECTS THE AGREGATED VALUES DERIVED FROM THE ANONYMIZED MICRODATA, AND MAY HAVE OTHER UNWANTED CONSEQUENCES, SUCH AS SAMPLING ERROR AND BIAS. ADDITIONAL DETAILS ABOUT THE SDC METHODS AND DATA ACESS CONDITIONS ARE PROVIDED IN THE DATA PROCESSING AND DATA ACESS CONDITIONS BELOW.

Geographic coverage

National, Mainland Tanzania and Zanzibar, Regions

Analysis unit

Households for Smallholder Farmers and Farm for Large Scale Farms

Universe

The survey covered agricultural households and large-scale farms.

Agricultural households are those that meet one or more of the following two conditions: a) Have or operate at least 25 square meters of arable land, b) Own or keep at least one head of cattle or five goats/sheep/pigs or fifty chicken/ducks/turkeys during the agriculture year.

Large-scale farms are those farms with at least 20 hectares of cultivated land, or 50 herds of cattle, or 100 goats/sheep/pigs, or 1,000 chickens. In addition to this, they should fulfill all of the following four conditions: i) The greater part of the produce should go to the market, ii) Operation of farm should be continuous, iii) There should be application of machinery / implements on the farm, and iv) There should be at least one permanent employee.

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

The frame used to extract the sample for the Annual Agricultural Sample Survey (AASS-2022/23) in Tanzania was derived from the 2022 Population and Housing Census (PHC-2022) Frame that lists all the Enumeration Areas (EAs/Hamlets) of the country. The AASS 2022/23 used a stratified two-stage sampling design which allows to produce reliable estimates at regional level for both Mainland Tanzania and Zanzibar.

In the first stage, the EAs (primary sampling units) were stratified into 2-3 strata within each region and then selected by using a systematic sampling procedure with probability proportional to size (PPS), where the measure of size is the number of agricultural households in the EA. Before the selection, within each stratum and domain (region), the Enumeration Areas (EAs) were ordered according to the codes of District and Council which reflect the geographical proximity, and then ordered according to the codes of Constituency, Division, Wards, and Village. An implicit stratification was also performed, ordering by Urban/Rural type at Ward level.

In the second stage, a simple random sampling selection was conducted . In hamlets with more than 200 households, twelve (12) agricultural households were drawn from the PHC 2022 list with a simple random sampling without replacement procedure in each sampled hamlet. In hamlets with 200 households or less, a listing exercise was carried out in each sampled hamlet, and twelve (12) agricultural households were selected with a simple random sampling without replacement procedure. A total of 1,352 PSUs were selected from the 2022 Population and Housing Census frame, of which 1,234 PSUs were from Mainland Tanzania and 118 from Zanzibar. A total number of 16,224 agricultural households were sampled (14,808 households from Mainland Tanzania and 1,416 from Zanzibar).

Mode of data collection

Computer Assisted Personal Interview [capi]

Research instrument

The 2022/23 Annual Agricultural Survey used two main questionnaires consolidated into a single questionnaire within the CAPIthe CAPI System, Smallholder Farmers and Large-Scale Farms Questionnaire. Smallholder Farmers questionnaire captured information at household level while Large Scale Farms questionnaire captured information at establishment/holding level. These questionnaires were used for data collection that covered core agricultural activities (crops, livestock, and fish farming) in both short and long rainy seasons. The 2022/23 AASS questionnaire covered 23 sections which are:

1. COVER; The cover page included the title of the survey, survey year (2022/23), general instructions for both the interviewers and respondents. It sets the context for the survey and also it shows the survey covers the United Republic of Tanzania.

2. SCREENING: Included preliminary questions designed to determine if the respondent or household is eligible to participate in the survey. It checks for core criteria such as involvement in agricultural activities.

3. START INTERVIEW: The introductory section where basic details about the interview are recorded, such as the date, location, and interviewer’s information. This helped in the identification and tracking of the interview process.

4. HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS AND HOLDER IDENTIFICATION: Collected information about all household members, including age, gender, relationship to the household head, and the identification of the main agricultural holder. This section helped in understanding the demographic composition of the agriculture household.

5. FIELD ROSTER: Provided the details of the various agricultural fields operated by the agriculture household. Information includes the size, location, and identification of each field. This section provided a comprehensive overview of the land resources available to the household.

6. VULI PLOT ROSTER: Focused on plots used during the Vuli season (short rainy season). It includes details on the crops planted, plot sizes, and any specific characteristics of these plots. This helps in assessing seasonal agricultural activities.

7. VULI CROP ROSTER: Provided detailed information on the types of crops grown during the Vuli season, including quantities produced and intended use (e.g., consumption, sale, storage). This section captures the output of short rainy season farming.

8. MASIKA PLOT ROSTER: Similar to Section 4 but focuses on the Masika season (long rainy season). It collects data on plot usage, crop types, and sizes. This helps in understanding the agricultural practices during the primary growing season.

9. MASIKA CROP ROSTER: Provided detailed information on crops grown during the Masika season, including production quantities and uses. This section captures the output from the main agricultural season.

10. PERMANENT CROP PRODUCTION: Focuses on perennial or permanent crops (e.g., fruit trees, tea, coffee). It includes data on the types of permanent crops, area under cultivation, production volumes, and uses. This section tracks long-term agricultural investments.

11. CROP HARVEST USE: In this, provided the details how harvested crops are utilized within the household. Categories included consumption, sale, storage, and other uses. This section helps in understanding food security and market engagement.

12. SEED AND SEEDLINGS ACQUISITION: Collected information on how the agriculture household acquires seeds and seedlings, including sources (e.g., purchased, saved, gifted) and types (local, improved, etc). This section provided insights into input supply chains and planting decisions based on the households, or head.

13. INPUT USE AND ACQUISITION (FERTILIZERS AND PESTICIDES): It provided the details of the use and acquisition of agricultural inputs such as fertilizers and pesticides. It included information on quantities used, sources, and types of inputs. This section assessed the input dependency and agricultural practices.

14. LIVESTOCK IN STOCK AND CHANGE IN STOCK: The questionnaire recorded the

Abstract

Geostat conducted Census of Agriculture 2014 in accordance with the World Programme of Agricultural Censuses 2006-2015 recommended by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). The census was based on the FAO methodology. Statistics experts of FAO and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) were actively engaged at every stage of the census process. At the first stage, in November 2014, together with Population Census there was conducted Census of Agriculture for households. In addition to this, in spring 2015 there was conducted Census of Agriculture for legal entities. As a result, the census covered all agricultural holdings in the country (on the territory controlled by the Government of Georgia) – all households and legal entities, who, as of October 1, 2014, were owning or temporarily operating agricultural land, livestock, poultry, beehive or permanent crop (agricultural), regardless the fact whether there was produced any kind of agricultural product or not during the reference year. The census provided diverse information about agriculture of Georgia such is structure and use of land operated by holdings, livestock, poultry and beehive numbers.

Geographic coverage

National coverage

Analysis unit

Households

Universe

The main statistical unit was the agricultural holding, defined as an economic unit engaged in agricultural production under single management without regard to size and legal status. An economic unit that operates agricultural land or permanent crop trees, but that during the reference year has no agricultural production, is also considered an agricultural holding. As the AC 2014 data collection for the agricultural holdings in the household sector was carried out jointly with the GPC, the common statistical unit was the agricultural production household. Two types of agricultural holdings were distinguished: family holdings and agricultural enterprises.

Kind of data

Census/enumeration data [cen]

Sampling procedure

(a) Frame In 2013, Geostat conducted preliminary fieldwork to establish the list of dwellings and households existing in Georgia. The information received from the preliminary fieldwork was used to update and finalize the census frame for data collection. For agricultural enterprises, to ensure full coverage of the list of potential agricultural enterprises, all existing reliable sources in the country were used.

Mode of data collection

Face-to-face [f2f]

Research instrument

One questionnaire was used for the AC 2014 data collection, in both paper and electronic format covering:

• Household roster
• Number of Holdings
• Structure of the Land Operated by Holdings
• Agricultural Land and Its Use
• Arable Land
• Permanent Crops
• Orchards
• Vineyards
• Livestock and Poultry

The AC 2014 questionnaire covered 15 of the 16 core items recommended for the WCA 2010 round. The following item was not covered: "Other economic production activities of the holding's enterprise".

Cleaning operations

(a) DATA PROCESSING AND ARCHIVING For several months after the census enumeration, approximately 300 people worked on the digitalization of census data. They were permanently supervised by IT and other technical staff. In parallel, digitized questionnaires were compared with paper questionnaires by editors. Finally, data were cleaned by the appropriate division at the central office of Geostat. The data cleaning process used several methods. Data relating to large holdings were verified by telephone calls. In addition, different reliable sources (registers) were used to fill in missing data. Furthermore, donor imputation was used to fill in the missing values. For tabulation, a special software was prepared by Geostat. Geostat implemented a microdata archiving system to save the census data.

(b) CENSUS DATA QUALITY Geostat conducted a PES to assess the quality of the AC. During the fieldwork, Geostat used a six-level control system, which involved the following categories of census staff: field work coordinator, regional coordinator, municipal supervisor, sector supervisor, instructor-coordinator and enumerator.

Abstract

The main purpose of the Survey of Agricultural Holdings is to produce official indicators in line with agricultural sector. The survey allows the compilation of statistics on crops and animal husbandry, of which information annual and permanent crops, sown area, average yield of annual crops and etc. Statistical tables are accessible through the following link: https:// www.geostat.ge/en/modules/categories/196/agriculture. One round of the survey (reference year) includes 5 inquiries: The Inception interview is carried out using the inception questionnaire during the period of January-February of the reference year. During this interview the sampled holdings are identified and situation existing at the holding as of first January is recorded. I, II and III quarter interviews are conducted by means of quarterly questionnaire at the beginning of the following month of the corresponding quarter of the reference year. Based on these surveys, the information about agricultural activities during the corresponding quarter is collected. The final interview is conducted by means of final questionnaire in January of the following year of the reference year. During this interview, the information about agricultural activities at the holding during IV quarter of the reference year and the summery information about agricultural activities at the holding during the whole reference year (from 1 January to 31 December of the previous year) are collected. During all five interviews, the same agricultural holdings (about 12 000) are interviewed which are selected by a two-stage stratified cluster random sampling procedure out of about 642 000 agricultural holdings operated in Georgia. On the first stage, clusters (settlements) are selected. On the second stage, holdings are selected within the selected clusters.

The survey completely covers the territory of Georgia, excluding the occupied territories of Autonomous Republic of Abkhazia and Tskhinvali region. Each year a new sample is selected based on a rotational design (on a 3-year basis). In particular, every year approximately 4 000 holdings out of the 12 000 sampled holdings are replaced by new holdings. Sampled holdings participate in the survey for 3 years. Large agricultural holdings are sampled every year with complete coverage. The statistical unit of the survey is the agricultural holding (family holdings and agricultural enterprises) - which is defined as an economic unit of agricultural production under single management comprising all livestock kept and all land used wholly or partly for agricultural production purposes, without regard to title, legal form or size. Agricultural activities are conducted under the supervision of a holder (in case of households - a member of household, in case of agricultural enterprises - director or authorized person), who is responsible for making decisions and takes all economic risks and expenses related to agricultural activities. More than 270 interviewers participate in the survey fieldwork. For the Data collection, computer-assisted personal interviewing method (CAPI) is used in the family holdings. In case of agricultural enterprises, the authorized persons of the enterprises (respondent) fill the electronic (online) questionnaires by themselves (CAWI). Coordination of the interviewers and the primary control of the collected data during the field is carried out by coordinators. Their working area covers several municipalities. The function of the coordinators also includes consultation for agricultural enterprises on methodological and technical issues related to the survey.

Geographic coverage

Entire country (Georgia), excluding occupied regions (Abkhazia and Tskhinvali region)

Analysis unit

Agricultural holding – economic unit of agricultural production under single management comprising all livestock kept and all land used wholly or partly for agricultural production purposes, without regard to title, legal form or size in which agricultural activities are conducted under the supervision of a holder, who is responsible for making decisions and takes all economic risks and expenses related to agricultural activities.

Universe

Survey sampling frame includes about 642,000 agriculture holdings (households and agricultural enterprises) operated in country. The Agricultural Census 2014 is the main source of the sample frame. Sampling frame is updated on a permanent basis in according to the results of survey of agricultural holdings, business register and different administrative sources.

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

• Main Source of the sample frame since 2016 - Agricultural Census 2014; • Sample frame contained 642,000 holding - sample size 12 000 (1.9%); • Sample Design: two-stage stratified cluster random sampling; - First stage - selection of cluster (Settlement); - Second stage - Selection of holdings within the selected clusters; • Each year a new sample is selected based on a rotational design; - Every year 1/3 of holdings (4,000) selected a year before are replaced (Sampled holdings participate in the survey during 3 years); • Extremely large agricultural holdings are sampled every year with complete coverage; • Additional Sources for updating sample frame: Sample Survey of Agricultural Holdings, Statistical Business Register, Administrative data existing in MEPA (large agricultural holdings); Sampling error of main indicators do not exceed 5% for a country level and 10% for a regional level;

Mode of data collection

Computer Assisted Personal Interview [capi]

Research instrument

Detailed information on structure, and sections of questionnaires used in the survey of agricultural holdings available in following link: https://www.geostat.ge/en/modules/categories/564/questionnaires-Agricultural-Statistics

Cleaning operations

After the field work, cleaning and harmonization of all inquiries are established at the Geostat head office - logical and arithmetical inconsistencies, as well as non-typical and suspicious data are detected, checked and corrected. Verification of the data is performed by contacting the respondents by phone. If verification with respondent is impossible, different imputation methods are used. Finally, indicators are calculated using weighted data. The obtained results are compared with corresponding results of the previous periods. In case of significant differences, the possible causes are identified and analyzed.

Response rate

In the 2021 fourth quarter, 963 holdings were not responded to due to refusing to be interviewed or would not be found during the fieldwork despite its existence. It is about 7.7% of the total Sampled holdings 12,436 holdings involved in the sample 2021 fourth quarter.

Abstract

The Sierra Leone Annual Agricultural Survey (SLAASS 2023) is a key component of Stats SL's efforts to provide up-to-date information on the agricultural sector. The 2023 SLAASS builds upon the successes of previous surveys and aligns with the best international practices. The primary objective of the SLAASS was to collect comprehensive data on crop and livestock production, as well as other relevant agricultural indicators. This information is essential for policymakers, researchers, and other stakeholders to assess the performance of the agricultural sector, identify opportunities for improvement, and inform evidence-based interventions. Specifically, it involved: · Collection of timely data on agricultural production and productivity at both national regional and district levels; · Gathering core data to help develop and review agricultural policies and to guide the implementation of agricultural plans at national and regional levels between agricultural sub-sectors; · Compilation of fundamental statistics that facilitate comparisons in the development of the agriculture sector across the country.

Geographic coverage

National coverage, with the exception of the Western Urban district.

Analysis unit

Agricultural households

Universe

Households involved in agricultural production and livestock rearing, in all the fifteen agricultural districts of the country, were considered for this study.

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

The survey employed a stratified random sampling technique to ensure a representative sample of agricultural households across all five regions and fifteen districts of Sierra Leone with the exception of the Western Urban district. A two-stage sampling method was employed to select households.Both stages of sampling employed probabilistic methods.

The country was divided into districts and within each district, areas called Enumeration Areas (EAs) were identified. A sample of EAs was then selected, followed by a sample of agricultural households (Ag HHs) within each chosen EA. The total number of EAs selected for the survey was 520, with 5,200 households interviewed in total. For each EA, the field team had a list of 10 households.

The survey included households engaged in crop cultivation and/or livestock rearing, regardless of the scale of their operations. However, it did not cover non-household holdings, such as large-scale commercial farms, or sectors like aquaculture, forestry, and fisheries.

The survey generated national, regional, and sub-regional estimates.

Mode of data collection

Computer Assisted Personal Interview [capi]

Research instrument

For this survey, two questionnaires were used: the Post Planting (PP) questionnaire and the Post Harvesting (PH) questionnaire. They were administered in each household, preferably to the head of household. They cover two modules, the CORE module and the ILP (Income, Labor and Productivity) module, split into several topics such as household demographics, land ownership, agricultural activities, livestock rearing, labor force composition, and participation in off-farm activities.

The questionnaires are provided as external resources.

Cleaning operations

The PP and PH questionnaire were implemented using CAPI with CSPRO. During data collection, some validation controls were integrated into the app to minimize mistakes when typing households’ answers. After data collection, a processing program designed with SPSS software allowed for cleaning both cases and variables. Duplicated cases were deleted and then the sampling weights were adjusted to take the two non-covered EAs into account. Missing, illegal, unlike and incoherent values were detected and then locally imputed objectively in respecting filters. Finally, the necessary tabulation variables were created and then tables were produced according to the tabulation plan designed earlier.

Sampling error estimates

To appreciate the data quality, some tables were supported by sampling errors estimates. Especially, coefficients of variations and standard errors were estimated for a set of indicators for open data publishing purposes.

This dataset presents final honey production estimates for 1986-1992. Data represents producers with five colonies or more, and covers number of honey producing colonies, yield per colony, honey production, stocks held by producers, average price received by producers at point of first sale, and value of production. At the national level, revisions of estimates of honey were one to four percent.

  Collection Organization: National Agricultural Statistics Service

  Collection Methodology: Surveys of the farm universe are made
  several times each year and estimates are adopted based on
  survey data and any other available administrative data that
  would support estimate levels.

  Collection Frequency: Annually.

  Update Characteristics: Updated in its entirety.

  STATISTICAL INFORMATION: The data reside in two ASCII text files.
  LANGUAGE: English
  ACCESS/AVAILABILITY:
  Data Center: National Agricultural Statistics Service
  Dissemination Media: Diskette, Internet home page
  File Format: ASCII delimited
  Access Instructions: Call NASS at 1-800-999-6779 for historical
  series data available on diskette. For historical series data
  available online, connect to the Internet home page at Cornell
  University.

  Or connect at the NASS Internet home page.
  URL: 'http://www.nass.usda.gov/index.asp'

Agricultural Mapping Software Market Outlook

The global agricultural mapping software market size was valued at approximately USD 1.2 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach around USD 3.4 billion by 2032, growing at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 12.5% during the forecast period. This promising growth is driven by increasing adoption of precision farming techniques and the need for efficient agricultural management practices. Advances in technology, coupled with rising demand for food production, are significant factors propelling the agricultural mapping software market.

One of the primary growth factors for the agricultural mapping software market is the increasing need for precision farming. Precision farming techniques rely on detailed data collection and analysis, which is facilitated by advanced agricultural mapping software. These tools help farmers make informed decisions about planting, watering, and harvesting, thereby maximizing crop yield and resource efficiency. The emphasis on data-driven farming is expected to drive significant adoption of mapping software across the globe.

Another crucial growth factor is the rising global population, which directly correlates with the increasing demand for food. As the world population continues to grow, the pressure on agricultural systems becomes more intense. Agricultural mapping software aids in optimizing land use, monitoring crop health, and predicting yields, thus playing a pivotal role in meeting the escalating food demands. The software's ability to enhance productivity and sustainability is highly appealing to stakeholders in the agricultural sector.

Technological advancements in GIS (Geographic Information Systems) and remote sensing are also propelling the market. The integration of satellite imagery, drones, and IoT (Internet of Things) devices with agricultural mapping software enables real-time data acquisition and analysis. These technologies provide farmers with detailed insights into their fields, enabling them to detect issues early and take corrective action promptly. The continuous innovation in these technologies is expected to further boost market growth.

From a regional perspective, North America is anticipated to hold the largest market share due to the high adoption rate of advanced farming technologies and substantial investments in agricultural research. Europe follows closely, driven by stringent agricultural policies and a strong focus on sustainable farming practices. The Asia Pacific region is expected to witness the fastest growth, attributed to increasing government initiatives to modernize agriculture and substantial investments in agritech startups. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa also present significant growth opportunities due to expanding agricultural activities and adoption of modern farming techniques.

Crop Monitoring Software plays a pivotal role in the agricultural mapping software market by providing farmers with the tools necessary to maintain and enhance crop health. This software allows for continuous observation and analysis of crops, ensuring that any potential issues such as diseases, pest infestations, or nutrient deficiencies are identified early. By leveraging real-time data, farmers can make informed decisions that lead to improved crop yields and quality. The integration of Crop Monitoring Software with other agricultural technologies further enhances its capabilities, making it an indispensable tool for modern farming practices. As the demand for efficient and sustainable agriculture grows, the adoption of such software is expected to rise, contributing significantly to the market's expansion.

Component Analysis

The agricultural mapping software market by component is divided into two primary segments: software and services. The software segment encompasses a range of solutions tailored to various agricultural needs, including GIS software, remote sensing software, and farm management software. These tools are designed to collect, analyze, and interpret data to support decision-making processes in farming operations. The sophistication and variety of available software solutions are continually expanding, driven by ongoing research and development efforts in agritech.

In contrast, the services segment includes consulting, training, maintenance, and support services that complement the software solutions. As more farmers and agricultural enterprises adopt mapp

Abstract

Ethiopian farming largely produces only enough food for the peasant holder and his family for consumption, leaving little to sell. This inadequate volume of production is ascribed to the tardy progress in the farming methods and scattered pieces of land holdings. Under this traditional sector, agriculture is practiced on public land and most of the produce is mainly for own consumption. The diverse climate of the country and the multiple utilizations of crops have prompted the vast majority of agricultural holders to grow various temporary and permanent crops. Despite the variation in the volume of production, the relative importance and pattern of growth of these crops are largely similar across many of the regions.

There is a general agreement that the performance of an agricultural system should achieve a steady supply of food to the people of a country. But, unless special attention is focused on agriculture, its performance can be impeded by vagaries of nature, population growth and scarcity and fragmentation of land, thus, affecting food supply and posing a challenge to the federal and regional governments. This situation calls for an overhaul of the agricultural system in the country or the regions.

In order to have a flourishing agriculture, which sustains reliable food supply, the federal and regional governments have to formulate and implement farm programs that ensure food security. The preparation, execution, monitoring and assessment of these programs entail statistics on agriculture particularly crop production since it is the prime target that national or regional agricultural policies aim at.

The collection of data on crop production should encompass all crop seasons in the agricultural calendar and farming activities in both rural and urban areas. It should also include the wide range of crops that are grown and embodied in the food security system, which are indispensable for a sustained provision of staple diet and other cash crops like coffee and Chat.

In view of this, crop production data for private peasant holdings for both “Meher” and “Belg” seasons in both rural and urban areas were collected in the census to provide the basis for decision making in the process of implementing timely food security measures and to make policy makers aware of the food situation in the country.

Geographic coverage

The 2001-2002 (1994 E.C) Agricultural Sample Enumeration was designed to cover the rural and urban parts of all districts (weredas) in the country on a large-scale sample basis excluding the pastoralist areas of the Afar and Somali regional states.

Analysis unit

Household/ Holder/ Crop

Universe

Agricultural households

Kind of data

Census/enumeration data [cen]

Sampling procedure

Sampling Frame The list of enumeration areas for each wereda was compiled from the 1994 Ethiopian Population and Housing Census cartographic work and was used a frame for the selection of the Primary Sampling Units (PSU). The 1994 Population and Housing Census enumeration area maps of the region for the selected sample EA's were updated, and the EA boundaries and descriptions were further clarified to reflect the current physical situation. The sampling frame used for the selection of ultimate sampling units (agricultural households) was a fresh list of households, which was prepared by the enumerator assigned in the sampled EA's using a prescribed listing instruction at the beginning of the launching of the census enumeration.

Sample Design In order to meet the objectives and requirements of the EASE, a stratified two-stage cluster sample design was used for the selection of ultimate sampling units. Thus, in the regions each wereda was treated as stratum for which major findings of the sample census are reported. The primary sampling units are the enumeration areas and the agricultural households are secondary (ultimate) sampling units. Finally, after the selection of the sample agricultural households, the various census forms were administered to all agricultural holders within the sampled agricultural households.

For the private peasant holdings in the rural areas a fixed number (25) of sample EA's in each wereda and 30 agricultural households in each EA were randomly selected (determined). In urban areas, weredas with urban EA's of less than or equal to 25, all the EA's were covered. However, for weredas with greater than 25 urban EA's, sample size of 25 EA's was selected. In each sampled urban EA, 30 agricultural households were randomly selected for the census. The sampled size determination in each wereda and thereby in each EA was based upon the required precision level of the major estimates and the cost consideration. The pilot survey and the previous year annual agricultural sample survey results were used to determine the required sample sizes per wereda.

Sample Selection of Primary Sampling Units Within each wereda (stratum) in the region, the selection of EAs was carried out using probability proportional to size systematic sampling. In this case, size being total number of agricultural households in each EA obtained from the listing exercise undertaken in the 1994 Ethiopian Population and Housing Census of the region.

Listing of Households and Selection of Agricultural Households In each sampled enumeration area of the region, a complete and fresh listing of households was carried out by canvassing the households in the EA. After a complete listing of the households and screening of the agricultural households during the listing operation in the selected EA, the agricultural households were serially numbered. From this list, a total of 30 agricultural households were selected systematically using a random start from the pre-assigned column table of random numbers. The sampling interval for each EA was determined by dividing the total number of agricultural households by 30. For crop cutting exercise purposes (rural domain) a total of 20 agricultural households were randomly selected from the 30 sampled agricultural households. The systematical random sampling technique was employed in this case, because its application is simple and flexible, and it can easily yield a proportionate sample.

Mode of data collection

Face-to-face [f2f]

Research instrument

Forms and equipment are instrumental in gathering information from various sources. The census forms are the vehicle and basic document for collecting the desired data. These include general-purpose forms covering farm management practices, demographic and economic characteristics, area, and production of both temporary and permanent crops; livestock, poultry and beehives ... etc. These forms are formulated for recording data generated through interview as well as objective measurements. Although the planning, organization and execution of the census were the responsibilities that rested within the CSA, development of the census forms was a tedious task that involved the formation of a working group composed of members of government and non-governmental organizations who are major users of agricultural data. Members of the working group were given the opportunity to identify their data requirements, define the needs of others and determine the specific questions that the forms should contain. The working group included the staff of the organizations that are involved in agricultural planning, collection of agricultural statistics and the use of data within the agricultural sector. The working group designed different forms for the various data items on crop area, production, and other variables of interest to meet the needs of current data users and also considered the future expectations. Attempt was made to make the content of the forms of acceptable length by distributing the variables to be collected in the different census forms. The rural census questionnaires/forms included: - Forms 94/0 and 94/1 that are used to record all households in the enumeration area, identify the agricultural households and select the units to be covered by the census. - Form 94/2 is developed to list all the members of the sampled agricultural households and record the demographic and economic characteristics of each of the members. - Forms 94/3A, 94/3B, 94/3C and 94/3D are prepared to enumerate crop data through interview and objective measurement. - Form 94/5 is designed to record crop area data via the physical or objective measurement of crop fields. - Form 94/6 is used to list all the fields under crop and select a crop field for each type of crop randomly for crop cutting exercise. - Forms 94/7A, 94/7B, and 94/7C are developed for recording yield data on cereals, oil seeds, pulses, vegetables root crops and permanent crops by weighing their yields obtained from sub-plots and/or trees selected for crop-cuttings. - Form 94/8 is prepared to enumerate livestock, poultry and beehives data by type, age, sex and purpose including products through interview (subjective approach). - Forms 94/9, 94/10 and 94/11 are used to collect data on crop and livestock product usage; miscellaneous items and farm tools, implements, draught animals and storage facilities, in that order, by interviewing the sample holders.

“Belg” season questionnaires identified as: - Form 94/12A and 94/12B that are used to record data on farm management practices of the “Belg” season. - Form 94/4 was the questionnaire used for collecting data on crop production forecast for 2001-2002 and the data collected using this form was published in December 2001 subjectively, while 94/12C is for recording “Belg” season crop area through objective measurement and volume of production through

Abstract

The agricultural survey in its current form covers all regions of the country and all 45 departments of Senegal. The agricultural survey is an annual statistical operation whose general objective is to estimate the level of the main agricultural output of family-type agricultural holdings. It also provides information on the physical characteristics of cultivated plots (geo-location, area) and major investments made in them (agricultural inputs, cultivation operations, soil management and restoration). The main indicators relate to yield levels, areas sown, production and means of production.

Following a modular approach, the 2022-2023 edition of the annual agricultural survey is characterized by the integration of the MEA module (Machines, Equipment and other Agricultural Assets). In addition, the basic module of the 50x2030 questionnaire allows the collection of data for the calculation of SDG 5.a.1.

Geographic coverage

The annual agricultural survey covers all 45 departments of Senegal. However, for reasons related to anonymization, the variable "Department" has been replaced by the variable "Agroecological Zone" which constitutes groupings in relation to the departments. The variable "Region" remains in the anonymized version of the data.

Analysis unit

Households and agricultural plots

Universe

The agricultural survey covers all households and plots in the 45 departments of Senegal.

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

The AAS was built on a two-stage survey, with census districts (CDs) as primary units (PUs) and agricultural households as secondary units (SUs), as defined during the general census of population and l'Habitat, de l'Agriculture et de l'Élevage (RGPHAE) of 2013. In line with the broadening of the scope of the survey recommended by the AGRIS approach, from this campaign onwards the sample design incorporated a first-stage stratification, induced by the second-stage stratification, to better reflect the various agricultural activities and improve the efficiency of the estimates. The choice of a first-degree stratification induced by that of the second degree, although less efficient than an independent first-degree stratification, was guided by the constraint of non-existence of relevant variables of interest in the sampling frame of the RGPHAE to discriminate against the CDs. The stratification took into account the relative importance of the main agricultural activities (in terms of household size) identified during the 2013 RGPHAE, namely rainfed agriculture, livestock and horticulture.

Thus, four strata were formed as follows: - the "rainfed only" stratum which groups together all the households practicing only rainfed crops; - the "livestock only" stratum for households that practice animal husbandry only; - the "Horticulture and other crops" stratum, which includes households that mainly practice horticulture and secondarily other crops (forestry, fruit growing, etc.); - the "Rainfed-livestock" stratum made up of households that practice both rainfed agriculture and livestock breeding.

The size of the sample of agricultural households to be surveyed was calculated by department (area of study) by setting a relative error of 10% on the variable of interest. The distribution of the sample of each department in the strata was made using the Bankier method (1988) developed in the methodological guide to the main sampling frame practices (pp. 79-81) of the Global Strategy for Agricultural and Rural Statistics (GSARS).

At the national level, the total theoretical sample is equal to 7,450 households, spread over 1,460 physical CDs, with 5 households per CD. At the end of the enumeration operation carried out in the physical sample CDs, adjustments were made to take into account the actual updated size of the CDs, which led to a final size of 7,378 households, or 1,382 CDs.

Sampling deviation

Compared to the survey plan, adjustments were made based on the response rate at each phase.

Mode of data collection

Computer Assisted Personal Interview [capi]

Research instrument

The first questionnaire collected information on census and characteristics of agricultural household plots. The second questionnaire collected information on agricultural production, machinery, equipment and agricultural productivity.

Response rate

First phase: sample of 7378 households, including 6360 surveyed, i.e. a coverage rate of 86%.

Second phase: sample of 7218 households, including 6,834 surveyed, i.e. a coverage rate of 95%.

This dataset measures food availability and access for 76 low- and middle-income countries. The dataset includes annual country-level data on area, yield, production, nonfood use, trade, and consumption for grains and root and tuber crops (combined as R&T in the documentation tables), food aid, total value of imports and exports, gross domestic product, and population compiled from a variety of sources. This dataset is the basis for the International Food Security Assessment 2015-2025 released in June 2015. This annual ERS report projects food availability and access for 76 low- and middle-income countries over a 10-year period. Countries (Spatial Description, continued): Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gambia, Georgia, Ghana, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Jamaica, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Moldova, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Nepal, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, North Korea, Pakistan, Peru, Philippines, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Swaziland, Tajikistan, Tanzania, Togo, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, Uganda, Uzbekistan, Vietnam, Yemen, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: CSV File for all years and all countries. File Name: gfa25.csvResource Title: International Food Security country data. File Name: GrainDemandProduction.xlsxResource Description: Excel files of individual country data. Please note that these files provide the data in a different layout from the CSV file. This version of the data files was updated 9-2-2021

More up-to-date files may be found at: https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/international-food-security.aspx

The USA: Food production index (2004-2006 = 100): The latest value from 2022 is 100.9 index points, a decline from 104.6 index points in 2021. In comparison, the world average is 109.8 index points, based on data from 188 countries. Historically, the average for the USA from 1961 to 2022 is 72.5 index points. The minimum value, 41.2 index points, was reached in 1961 while the maximum of 104.9 index points was recorded in 2016.

Abstract

Food security has become a burring issue in Ethiopia since it is an absolute prerequisite for political and social stability. It received national prominence in the aftermath of the recurring drought and famine and obviously became an immediate domestic policy concern. The gap between the dire need for food supply is compounded by rapidly increasing population, depletion of natural resources and the existing traditional way of farming. It even requires sacrifice to provide adequate supply of food in such a situation where natural and human factors have negatively impacted in the agricultural production and resulted in recurrent droughts and sometimes in catastrophe. Pressed by these problems and other economic factors, the Ethiopian government has centered its agricultural policy on ensuring food security by allocating more resources to increase agricultural production so as to ward off food shortage and ensure continuous adequate supply of food. To monitor and evaluate the performance of the policy and the trends in the charging patterns in agricultural, statistical information on agriculture is required as an input since agriculture is a primary activity connected with food availability. The Central Statistical Agency (CSA) has been generating statistical information used as inputs in the formulation of agricultural policies by collecting processing and summarizing reliable, comprehensive and timely data on the country's agriculture. As part of this mission the 2003-2004 (1996 E.C) Annual Agricultural Sample Survey was conducted to furnish data on cropland area and production of crops within the private peasant holdings for Main (“Meher”) season of the quoted year.

The general objective of CSA's annual Agricultural Sample Survey (AgSS) is to collect basic quantitative information on the country's agriculture that is essential for planning, policy formulation, food security, etc. The survey is composed of four components: Crop production forecast survey. Main (“Meher”) season survey, Livestock survey and “Belg” season survey.

The specific objectives of Main (“Meher”) season survey are: - To estimate the total cultivated area, production and yield of crops. - To estimate the total volume of inputs used, inputs applied area and number of holders using inputs. - To estimate the total cultivated area and other forms of land use.

Geographic coverage

The 2003-2004 annual Agricultural Sample Survey covered the entire rural parts of the country except all zones of Gambella region, and the non-sedentary population of three zones of Afar and six zones of Somali regions.

Note: The crop cutting exercise part of the survey from November 2003 up to January 2004 was not done in Gambela regional state, therefore no production estimates for the region was computed for Meher (main) season.

Analysis unit

Agricultural household/ Holder/ Crop

Universe

Agricultural households

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

Sampling Frame: The list containing EAs of all regions and their respective agricultural households obtained from the 2001/02 Ethiopian Agricultural Sample Enumeration (EASE) was used as the sampling frame in order to select the primary sampling units (EAs). Consequently, all sample EAs were selected from this frame based on the design proposed for the survey. Sample Design A stratified two-stage cluster sample design was used to select the sample. Enumeration Areas (EAs) were taken to be the primary sampling units (PSUs) and the secondary sampling units (SSUs) were agricultural households. Sample enumeration areas from each stratum were sub-samples of the 2001/02 (1994 E.C) Ethiopian Agricultural Sample Enumeration. They were selected using probability proportional to size systematic sampling; size being number of agricultural households obtained from the 1994 Population & Housing Census and adjusted for the sub-sampling effect. Within each sample EA a fresh list of households was prepared and 25 agricultural households from each sample EA were systematically selected at the second stage. The survey questionnaire was finally administered to the 25 agricultural households selected at the second stage. Information on area under crops and Meher season production of crops was obtained from the 25 households that were ultimately selected. It is important to note, however, that data on crop cutting were obtained only from fifteen sampled households (the 11th - 25th households selected).

The sample size for the 2003-04 agricultural sample survey was determined by taking into account both the required level of precision for the most important estimates within each domain and the amount of resources allocated to the survey. In order to reduce non- sampling errors, manageability of the survey in terms of quality and operational capability was also considered. Except Harari, Addis Ababa and Dire Dawa, where each region as a whole was taken to be the domain of estimation; each zone of a region / special wereda was adopted as a stratum for which major findings of the survey are reported.

Mode of data collection

Face-to-face [f2f]

Research instrument

The 2003-2004 annual Agricultural Sample Survey used structured questionnaires to collect agricultural information from selected sample households. List of forms in the questionnaires: - AgSS Form 96/0: Used to list all households and agricultural holders in the sample enumeration areas. - AgSS Form 96/1: Used to list selected households and agricultural holders in the sample enumeration areas. - AgSS Form 96/3A: Used to list fields under temporary crops and farm management practice. - AgSS Form 96/3B: Used to list fields under permanent crops and farm management practice. - AgSS Form 96/3C: Used to list fields under mixed crops and farm management practice. - AgSS Form 96/3D: Used to collect information about other land use type and area and other agricultural related questions. - AgSS Form 96/5: Used to list temporary crop fields for selecting crop fields for crop cutting. - AgSS Form 96/6: Used to collect information about temporary crop cutting results.

Cleaning operations

Editing, Coding and Verification: Statistical data editing plays an important role in ensuring the quality of the collected survey data. It minimizes the effects of errors introduced while collecting data in the field , hence the need for data editing, and verification. An editing, coding and verification instruction manual was perpared and reproduced. Then 65 editors-coders and verifiers were trained for two days in editing , coding and.verification using the aforementioned manual as a reference and teaching aid. The completed questionnaires were edited, coded and later verified on a 1OO % basis before the questioners were passed over to the data entry unit. The editlng, coding and verification exercise of all questionnaires took 40 days.

Data Entry, Cleaning and Tabulation: Before data entry, the Natural resource and Agricultural Statistics Department prepared edit specification for the survey for use on personal computers for data consistency checking purposes . The data on the edited and coded questionnaires were then entered into personal computers. The data were then checked and cleaned using the edit specification prepared earlier for this purpose. The data entry operation involved about 64 data encoders and it took 50 days to finsh the job. Finally, tabulation was done on personal computers to produce statistical tables as per the tabulation plan.

Response rate

A total of 2,072 enumeration areas were initially selected to be covered by the survey, however, due to various reasons 16 EA's were not covered and the survey was successfully carried out in 2,056 (99.23 %) EAs. As regards the ultimate sampling unit, it was planned to conduct the survey on 51,800 agricultural households and 51,300 (99.03 %) households were actually covered by the Meher season Agricultural Sample Survey.

Sampling error estimates

Estimation procedure of totals, ratios, sampling error and the measurement of precision of estimates (CV) are given in Appendix I and II of 2003-2004 Agricultural Sample Survey, Volume I report.

Data appraisal

As it was explained in the response rate under sampling section, the non response rate was minimal. There is no testing for bias made in this survey.

Agriculture has guided Pennsylvania's economic growth and cultural development and has profoundly shaped the lands and people of the Commonwealth. The 1850 Federal Decennial Census was the first time in history that data was collected on agricultural production at a national scale. The census manuscripts for Pennsylvania were digitized by PHMC from the original documents in the collections of the National Archives and Records Administration. This dataset includes agricultural production data compiled from Schedule 4 - Productions of Agriculture of the 1850 census and aggregated at the county and municipality level. The visualization combines a timeless practice with the latest advancements in technology. The interactive map of Pennsylvania depicting the value of farms and amounts of livestock provides users with a glimpse into agricultural life in 1850.