16 datasets found
  1. Data from: Food Patterns Equivalents Database (FPED)

    • catalog.data.gov
    • agdatacommons.nal.usda.gov
    • +1more
    Updated Apr 21, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Agricultural Research Service (2025). Food Patterns Equivalents Database (FPED) [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/food-patterns-equivalents-database-fped-8df33
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 21, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Agricultural Research Servicehttps://www.ars.usda.gov/
    Description

    USDA’s Food Patterns Equivalents Database (FPED) converts the foods and beverages in the Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies to the 37 USDA Food Patterns components. The FPED was formerly known as the MyPyramid Equivalents Database. The FPED serves as a unique research tool to evaluate food and beverage intakes of Americans with respect to the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommendations. The Food Patterns are measured as cup equivalents of Fruit, Vegetables, and Dairy; ounce equivalents of Grains and Protein Foods; teaspoon equivalents of Added Sugars; gram equivalents of Solid Fats and Oils; and the number of Alcoholic Drinks. In addition to the SAS datasets, the FPED release includes: (1) the Food Patterns Equivalents Ingredient Database (FPID) that includes the 37 USDA Food Patterns components per 100 grams of each unique ingredient used in the FNDDS; and (2) listings of gram weights for one cup equivalents of fruits, vegetables, dairy, and legumes used in the FPED. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Food Patterns Equivalents Database. File Name: Web Page, url: https://www.ars.usda.gov/northeast-area/beltsville-md-bhnrc/beltsville-human-nutrition-research-center/food-surveys-research-group/docs/fped-overview/ Food Patterns Equivalents Database (FPED) converts the foods and beverages in the Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies to the 37 USDA Food Patterns components. The FPED serves as a unique research tool to evaluate food and beverage intakes of Americans with respect to the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommendations.

  2. A

    SuperTracker - source code and foods database

    • data.amerigeoss.org
    • healthdata.gov
    • +2more
    xls, zip
    Updated Jul 26, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    United States (2019). SuperTracker - source code and foods database [Dataset]. https://data.amerigeoss.org/nl/dataset/groups/supertracker-source-code-and-foods-database
    Explore at:
    xls, zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 26, 2019
    Dataset provided by
    United States
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    SuperTracker was an online tool offered by USDA (2011-2018) that helped users track diet, physical activity and weight. SuperTracker provided a personalized plan based on the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans for what you should eat and drink and guided users to making better choices. This dataset includes the SuperTracker source code (latest update April 2018), including: front end application, database schema, documentation, deployment scripts and a ReadMe.txt file that provides high level instructions for the source code. Database connection strings and actual data are not included. The full foods database spreadsheet is attached as well; these foods are based on the Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies (FNDDS), and the Food Patterns Equivalents Database (FPED), both from the USDA/ARS Food Surveys Research Group.

    It is important to note that the code is based on 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans and will not be updated to reflect future guidance. In addition, the food database is based on FNDDS from 2011-2012 (FNDDS 6.0) and FPED from 2011-2012 and will not be updated with future data releases.

  3. F

    SNAP Benefits Recipients in Ford County, KS

    • fred.stlouisfed.org
    json
    Updated Dec 20, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2024). SNAP Benefits Recipients in Ford County, KS [Dataset]. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CBR20057KSA647NCEN
    Explore at:
    jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 20, 2024
    License

    https://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domainhttps://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domain

    Area covered
    Ford County, Kansas
    Description

    Graph and download economic data for SNAP Benefits Recipients in Ford County, KS (CBR20057KSA647NCEN) from 1989 to 2022 about Ford County, KS; KS; SNAP; nutrition; food stamps; benefits; food; and USA.

  4. f

    Table_1_The effects of specific vegetable subtypes on constipation incidence...

    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    docx
    Updated Jul 24, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Chenyu Jiang; Yaojian Shao (2024). Table_1_The effects of specific vegetable subtypes on constipation incidence in the general United States population.docx [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1403636.s001
    Explore at:
    docxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 24, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers
    Authors
    Chenyu Jiang; Yaojian Shao
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    BackgroundWhile the intake of larger quantities of vegetables has been linked to a reduction in constipation risk, which vegetables in particular underlie this risk reduction remains incompletely understood. As such, the present study was developed to explore correlations between the intake of particular vegetable types and the risk of constipation.MethodsThis cross-sectional analysis was based on data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) collected from 2005-2010. Classifications and intake assessments for different vegetables were assessed with the Food Patterns Equivalents Database (FPED), while stool frequency or stool consistency was used to define constipation. Relationships between the intake of particular vegetable components and constipation were assessed through a weighted logistic regression approach. Subgroup and restricted cubic spline (RCS) regression analyses were further employed to explore associations between specific vegetable subtypes and constipation.ResultsThis study included 13,860 eligible subjects, of whom 1,405 and 12,455 were respectively classified into the constipated and non-constipated groups. Following multivariate adjustment, the intake of non-starchy vegetables including orange, red, dark green, and other vegetables was found to be positively associated with a reduction in constipation risk. In contrast, constipation was unrelated to total starchy vegetable or potato intake. Tomatoes, in particular, were associated with a marked decrease in constipation risk (odds ratios: 0.80, 95% confidence interval: 0.71–0.91). These results were confirmed through RCS and subgroup analyses.ConclusionNon-starchy vegetables, particularly tomatoes, were found to be associated with a pronounced reduction in constipation risk, which was unaffected by the intake of potatoes or starchy vegetables.

  5. Ford Dry Lake, CA (2184)

    • erddap.sensors.axds.co
    • erddap.sensors.ioos.us
    Updated Nov 16, 2011
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Soil Climate Analysis Network (SCAN) (2011). Ford Dry Lake, CA (2184) [Dataset]. http://erddap.sensors.axds.co/erddap/info/gov_usda_nrcs_scan_2184/index.html
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Nov 16, 2011
    Dataset provided by
    United States Department of Agriculturehttp://usda.gov/
    Authors
    Soil Climate Analysis Network (SCAN)
    Time period covered
    Nov 16, 2011 - Oct 22, 2025
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    z, time, station, latitude, longitude, wind_speed, air_pressure, soil_salinity, air_temperature, soil_temperature, and 31 more
    Description

    Timeseries data from 'Ford Dry Lake, CA (2184)' (gov_usda_nrcs_scan_2184) _NCProperties=version=2,netcdf=4.8.1,hdf5=1.12.2 cdm_altitude_proxy=z cdm_data_type=TimeSeriesProfile cdm_profile_variables=time cdm_timeseries_variables=station,longitude,latitude contributor_email=askusda@usda.gov,feedback@axiomdatascience.com contributor_name=US Department of Agriculture (USDA),Axiom Data Science contributor_role=contributor,processor contributor_role_vocabulary=NERC contributor_url=https://www.usda.gov/,https://www.axiomdatascience.com Conventions=IOOS-1.2, CF-1.6, ACDD-1.3 defaultDataQuery=lwe_precipitation_rate_cm_time_sum_over_pt1h,relative_humidity_qc_agg,wind_speed_of_gust_qc_agg,wind_speed_of_gust,solar_irradiance_cm_time_mean_over_pt1h_qc_agg,lwe_thickness_of_precipitation_amount,solar_irradiance_cm_time_mean_over_pt1h,wind_speed,soil_salinity_qc_agg,wind_speed_qc_agg,lwe_thickness_of_precipitation_amount_qc_agg,soil_moisture_percent_qc_agg,wind_from_direction,air_temperature_qc_agg,wind_from_direction_qc_agg,soil_salinity,air_temperature,air_pressure_qc_agg,soil_temperature,soil_temperature_qc_agg,lwe_precipitation_rate_cm_time_sum_over_pt1h_qc_agg,z,soil_moisture_percent,time,relative_humidity,air_pressure&time>=max(time)-3days Easternmost_Easting=-115.09763 featureType=TimeSeriesProfile geospatial_lat_max=33.6547 geospatial_lat_min=33.6547 geospatial_lat_units=degrees_north geospatial_lon_max=-115.09763 geospatial_lon_min=-115.09763 geospatial_lon_units=degrees_east geospatial_vertical_max=0.0 geospatial_vertical_min=-1.02 geospatial_vertical_positive=up geospatial_vertical_units=m history=Downloaded from US Department of Agriculture (USDA) at https://wcc.sc.egov.usda.gov/nwcc/site?sitenum=2184 id=104379 infoUrl=https://sensors.ioos.us/#metadata/104379/station institution=Soil Climate Analysis Network (SCAN) naming_authority=com.axiomdatascience Northernmost_Northing=33.6547 platform=fixed platform_name=Ford Dry Lake, CA (2184) platform_vocabulary=http://mmisw.org/ont/ioos/platform processing_level=Level 2 references=https://wcc.sc.egov.usda.gov/nwcc/site?sitenum=2184,https://wcc.sc.egov.usda.gov/nwcc/site?sitenum=2184,https://admin.axds.co/PRISM%20Probabilistic%20PRISM%20Probabilistic-Spatial%20QC%20(PSQC)%20System%20Spatial%20QC%20(PSQC)%20System sourceUrl=https://wcc.sc.egov.usda.gov/nwcc/site?sitenum=2184 Southernmost_Northing=33.6547 standard_name_vocabulary=CF Standard Name Table v72 station_id=104379 time_coverage_end=2025-10-22T07:00:00Z time_coverage_start=2011-11-16T20:00:00Z Westernmost_Easting=-115.09763

  6. MOESM3 of Genomic measures of inbreeding in the Norwegian–Swedish...

    • springernature.figshare.com
    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    xlsx
    Updated May 30, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Brandon Velie; Marina Solé; Kim Fegraeus; Maria Rosengren; Knut Røed; Carl-Fredrik Ihler; Eric Strand; Gabriella Lindgren (2023). MOESM3 of Genomic measures of inbreeding in the Norwegian–Swedish Coldblooded Trotter and their associations with known QTL for reproduction and health traits [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.8190773.v1
    Explore at:
    xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 30, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Figsharehttp://figshare.com/
    Authors
    Brandon Velie; Marina Solé; Kim Fegraeus; Maria Rosengren; Knut Røed; Carl-Fredrik Ihler; Eric Strand; Gabriella Lindgren
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Additional file 3: Table S3. Results of the paired t-test (P-values) between FPED and all FROH estimates.

  7. MOESM2 of Genomic measures of inbreeding in the Norwegian–Swedish...

    • springernature.figshare.com
    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    xlsx
    Updated Jun 9, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Brandon Velie; Marina Solé; Kim Fegraeus; Maria Rosengren; Knut Røed; Carl-Fredrik Ihler; Eric Strand; Gabriella Lindgren (2023). MOESM2 of Genomic measures of inbreeding in the Norwegian–Swedish Coldblooded Trotter and their associations with known QTL for reproduction and health traits [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.8190767.v1
    Explore at:
    xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 9, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Figsharehttp://figshare.com/
    Authors
    Brandon Velie; Marina Solé; Kim Fegraeus; Maria Rosengren; Knut Røed; Carl-Fredrik Ihler; Eric Strand; Gabriella Lindgren
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Additional file 2: Table S2. Correlation matrix between FPED and all FROH estimates.

  8. p

    Trends in Free Lunch Eligibility (2022-2023): Ford Elementary School vs....

    • publicschoolreview.com
    Updated Oct 8, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Public School Review (2025). Trends in Free Lunch Eligibility (2022-2023): Ford Elementary School vs. Colorado vs. Littleton School District No. 6 In The County Of Arapahoe [Dataset]. https://www.publicschoolreview.com/ford-elementary-school-profile/80122
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 8, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Public School Review
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Littleton, Littleton School District 6, Colorado
    Description

    This dataset tracks annual free lunch eligibility from 2022 to 2023 for Ford Elementary School vs. Colorado and Littleton School District No. 6 In The County Of Arapahoe

  9. p

    Trends in Free Lunch Eligibility (2000-2023): Albert F Ford Middle School...

    • publicschoolreview.com
    Updated Feb 9, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Public School Review (2025). Trends in Free Lunch Eligibility (2000-2023): Albert F Ford Middle School vs. Massachusetts vs. Acushnet School District [Dataset]. https://www.publicschoolreview.com/albert-f-ford-middle-school-profile
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 9, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Public School Review
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Acushnet School District, Massachusetts
    Description

    This dataset tracks annual free lunch eligibility from 2000 to 2023 for Albert F Ford Middle School vs. Massachusetts and Acushnet School District

  10. p

    Trends in Free Lunch Eligibility (1992-2023): Ford Elementary School vs....

    • publicschoolreview.com
    Updated Feb 9, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Public School Review (2025). Trends in Free Lunch Eligibility (1992-2023): Ford Elementary School vs. California vs. West Contra Costa Unified School District [Dataset]. https://www.publicschoolreview.com/ford-elementary-school-profile
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 9, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Public School Review
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    West Contra Costa Unified School District
    Description

    This dataset tracks annual free lunch eligibility from 1992 to 2023 for Ford Elementary School vs. California and West Contra Costa Unified School District

  11. p

    Trends in Reduced-Price Lunch Eligibility (2003-2023): William Ford...

    • publicschoolreview.com
    Updated Jun 18, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Public School Review (2021). Trends in Reduced-Price Lunch Eligibility (2003-2023): William Ford Elementary School vs. Michigan vs. Dearborn City School District [Dataset]. https://www.publicschoolreview.com/william-ford-elementary-school-profile
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 18, 2021
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Public School Review
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Dearborn City School District
    Description

    This dataset tracks annual reduced-price lunch eligibility from 2003 to 2023 for William Ford Elementary School vs. Michigan and Dearborn City School District

  12. p

    Trends in Free Lunch Eligibility (2014-2023): Ford Early Learning Center vs....

    • publicschoolreview.com
    Updated Oct 8, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Public School Review (2025). Trends in Free Lunch Eligibility (2014-2023): Ford Early Learning Center vs. Michigan vs. Ypsilanti Community Schools [Dataset]. https://www.publicschoolreview.com/ford-early-learning-center-profile
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 8, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Public School Review
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Michigan, Ypsilanti, Ypsilanti Community Schools
    Description

    This dataset tracks annual free lunch eligibility from 2014 to 2023 for Ford Early Learning Center vs. Michigan and Ypsilanti Community Schools

  13. p

    Trends in Free Lunch Eligibility (1992-2023): Gerald R. Ford Elementary...

    • publicschoolreview.com
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Public School Review, Trends in Free Lunch Eligibility (1992-2023): Gerald R. Ford Elementary School vs. California vs. Desert Sands Unified School District [Dataset]. https://www.publicschoolreview.com/gerald-r-ford-elementary-school-profile
    Explore at:
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Public School Review
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Desert Sands Unified School District
    Description

    This dataset tracks annual free lunch eligibility from 1992 to 2023 for Gerald R. Ford Elementary School vs. California and Desert Sands Unified School District

  14. p

    Trends in Free Lunch Eligibility (2004-2023): Ford Elementary School vs....

    • publicschoolreview.com
    Updated Oct 8, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Public School Review (2025). Trends in Free Lunch Eligibility (2004-2023): Ford Elementary School vs. Arizona vs. Tucson Unified District (4403) [Dataset]. https://www.publicschoolreview.com/ford-elementary-school-profile/85730
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 8, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Public School Review
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Tucson, Tucson Unified School District
    Description

    This dataset tracks annual free lunch eligibility from 2004 to 2023 for Ford Elementary School vs. Arizona and Tucson Unified District (4403)

  15. p

    Trends in Reduced-Price Lunch Eligibility (1999-2023): Ford Elementary...

    • publicschoolreview.com
    Updated Oct 8, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Public School Review (2025). Trends in Reduced-Price Lunch Eligibility (1999-2023): Ford Elementary School vs. Texas vs. Conroe Independent School District [Dataset]. https://www.publicschoolreview.com/ford-elementary-school-profile/77386
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 8, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Public School Review
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Conroe Independent School District, Texas
    Description

    This dataset tracks annual reduced-price lunch eligibility from 1999 to 2023 for Ford Elementary School vs. Texas and Conroe Independent School District

  16. p

    Trends in Reduced-Price Lunch Eligibility (2005-2023): Ford Elementary...

    • publicschoolreview.com
    Updated Oct 8, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Public School Review (2025). Trends in Reduced-Price Lunch Eligibility (2005-2023): Ford Elementary School vs. Arizona vs. Tucson Unified District (4403) [Dataset]. https://www.publicschoolreview.com/ford-elementary-school-profile/85730
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 8, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Public School Review
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Tucson, Tucson Unified School District
    Description

    This dataset tracks annual reduced-price lunch eligibility from 2005 to 2023 for Ford Elementary School vs. Arizona and Tucson Unified District (4403)

  17. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Agricultural Research Service (2025). Food Patterns Equivalents Database (FPED) [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/food-patterns-equivalents-database-fped-8df33
Organization logo

Data from: Food Patterns Equivalents Database (FPED)

Related Article
Explore at:
Dataset updated
Apr 21, 2025
Dataset provided by
Agricultural Research Servicehttps://www.ars.usda.gov/
Description

USDA’s Food Patterns Equivalents Database (FPED) converts the foods and beverages in the Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies to the 37 USDA Food Patterns components. The FPED was formerly known as the MyPyramid Equivalents Database. The FPED serves as a unique research tool to evaluate food and beverage intakes of Americans with respect to the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommendations. The Food Patterns are measured as cup equivalents of Fruit, Vegetables, and Dairy; ounce equivalents of Grains and Protein Foods; teaspoon equivalents of Added Sugars; gram equivalents of Solid Fats and Oils; and the number of Alcoholic Drinks. In addition to the SAS datasets, the FPED release includes: (1) the Food Patterns Equivalents Ingredient Database (FPID) that includes the 37 USDA Food Patterns components per 100 grams of each unique ingredient used in the FNDDS; and (2) listings of gram weights for one cup equivalents of fruits, vegetables, dairy, and legumes used in the FPED. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Food Patterns Equivalents Database. File Name: Web Page, url: https://www.ars.usda.gov/northeast-area/beltsville-md-bhnrc/beltsville-human-nutrition-research-center/food-surveys-research-group/docs/fped-overview/ Food Patterns Equivalents Database (FPED) converts the foods and beverages in the Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies to the 37 USDA Food Patterns components. The FPED serves as a unique research tool to evaluate food and beverage intakes of Americans with respect to the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommendations.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu