Snapshot img

Enterprise Labeling Software Market Size 2024-2028

The enterprise labeling software market size is forecast to increase by USD 133.9 mn at a CAGR of 6.59% between 2023 and 2028.

The market is witnessing significant growth due to several key trends. The adoption of enterprise labeling solutions is increasing as businesses seek to streamline their labeling processes and improve efficiency. Dynamic labeling, which allows for real-time updates to labels, is gaining popularity as it enables companies to quickly respond to changing regulations or product information. The market is experiencing growth as companies leverage data integration and analytics to streamline labeling processes, ensuring greater accuracy, compliance, and operational efficiency. Moreover, stringent government regulations mandating accurate and compliant labeling are driving the need for enterprise labeling software. These factors are expected to fuel market growth In the coming years. The market landscape is constantly evolving, and staying abreast of these trends is essential for businesses looking to remain competitive.

What will be the Size of the Enterprise Labeling Software Market During the Forecast Period?

Request Free Sample

The market encompasses solutions designed for creating, managing, and printing labels in various industries. Compliance with regulations and ensuring labeling accuracy are key drivers for this market. Real-time updates and customizable templates enable businesses to maintain consistency and adapt to changing requirements. Integration capabilities with enterprise systems, data management planning, and the printing process are essential for streamlining workflows and improving efficiency. Innovative technology, such as automation and machine learning, enhances labeling quality and speed, providing a competitive edge.
A user-friendly interface and economic conditions influence market demand. Urbanization and the growing need for packaging solutions, branding, and on-premises-based software further expand the market's reach. Overall, the market continues to grow, offering significant benefits to businesses seeking to optimize their labeling processes.

How is this Enterprise Labeling Software Industry segmented and which is the largest segment?

The industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD million' for the period 2024-2028, as well as historical data from 2018-2022 for the following segments.

Deployment

  On-premise
  Cloud


End-user

  FMCG
  Retail and e-commerce
  Healthcare
  Warehousing and logistics
  Others


Geography

  APAC

    China
    India
    Japan


  North America

    US


  Europe

    Germany


  Middle East and Africa



  South America

By Deployment Insights

The on-premise segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.

The market is driven by the need for compliance, creation, management, printing, and real-time updates of labels in various industries. Large enterprises require unique labeling solutions to meet diverse industry standards and traceability regulations, ensuring product quality and customer satisfaction. On-premise and cloud-based enterprise labeling software offer agility, scalability, and flexibility, optimizing operations and enhancing resilience and adaptability. Compliance management, seamless collaboration, contactless processes, safety measures, and predictive analytics are key features. Driving factors include digitalization, automation, and evolving challenges in logistics and e-commerce. However, varying industry standards, implementation costs, legacy systems, and integration challenges pose restraining factors. Enterprise labeling software solutions offer customizable templates, integration capabilities, and language support, catering to the economic condition, urbanization, and packaging solutions.

Brands prioritize a data-driven approach and regulatory requirements In their labeling strategy. The market is expected to grow, with key players catering to enterprise sizes and time to market.

Get a glance at the Enterprise Labeling Software Industry report of share of various segments Request Free Sample

The On-premise segment was valued at USD 163.80 mn in 2018 and showed a gradual increase during the forecast period.

Regional Analysis

APAC is estimated to contribute 41% to the growth of the global market during the forecast period.

Technavio's analysts have elaborately explained the regional trends and drivers that shape the market during the forecast period.

For more insights on the market share of various regions, Request Free Sample

The market in APAC is projected to experience significant growth due to the increasing number of end-users in sectors such as food and beverage, personal care products, and pharmaceuticals.

We present Proline (http://www.profiproteomics.fr/proline/), a robust software suite for analysis of MS-based proteomics data; it provides high performance in a user-friendly interface for all data set sizes from small to very large

Leaves from genetically unique Juglans regia plants were scanned using X-ray micro-computed tomography (microCT) on the X-ray μCT beamline (8.3.2) at the Advanced Light Source (ALS) in Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA USA). Soil samples were collected in Fall of 2017 from the riparian oak forest located at the Russell Ranch Sustainable Agricultural Institute at the University of California Davis. The soil was sieved through a 2 mm mesh and was air dried before imaging. A single soil aggregate was scanned at 23 keV using the 10x objective lens with a pixel resolution of 650 nanometers on beamline 8.3.2 at the ALS. Additionally, a drought stressed almond flower bud (Prunus dulcis) from a plant housed at the University of California, Davis, was scanned using a 4x lens with a pixel resolution of 1.72 µm on beamline 8.3.2 at the ALS Raw tomographic image data was reconstructed using TomoPy. Reconstructions were converted to 8-bit tif or png format using ImageJ or the PIL package in Python before further processing. Images were annotated using Intel’s Computer Vision Annotation Tool (CVAT) and ImageJ. Both CVAT and ImageJ are free to use and open source. Leaf images were annotated in following Théroux-Rancourt et al. (2020). Specifically, Hand labeling was done directly in ImageJ by drawing around each tissue; with 5 images annotated per leaf. Care was taken to cover a range of anatomical variation to help improve the generalizability of the models to other leaves. All slices were labeled by Dr. Mina Momayyezi and Fiona Duong.To annotate the flower bud and soil aggregate, images were imported into CVAT. The exterior border of the bud (i.e. bud scales) and flower were annotated in CVAT and exported as masks. Similarly, the exterior of the soil aggregate and particulate organic matter identified by eye were annotated in CVAT and exported as masks. To annotate air spaces in both the bud and soil aggregate, images were imported into ImageJ. A gaussian blur was applied to the image to decrease noise and then the air space was segmented using thresholding. After applying the threshold, the selected air space region was converted to a binary image with white representing the air space and black representing everything else. This binary image was overlaid upon the original image and the air space within the flower bud and aggregate was selected using the “free hand” tool. Air space outside of the region of interest for both image sets was eliminated. The quality of the air space annotation was then visually inspected for accuracy against the underlying original image; incomplete annotations were corrected using the brush or pencil tool to paint missing air space white and incorrectly identified air space black. Once the annotation was satisfactorily corrected, the binary image of the air space was saved. Finally, the annotations of the bud and flower or aggregate and organic matter were opened in ImageJ and the associated air space mask was overlaid on top of them forming a three-layer mask suitable for training the fully convolutional network. All labeling of the soil aggregate and soil aggregate images was done by Dr. Devin Rippner. These images and annotations are for training deep learning models to identify different constituents in leaves, almond buds, and soil aggregates Limitations: For the walnut leaves, some tissues (stomata, etc.) are not labeled and only represent a small portion of a full leaf. Similarly, both the almond bud and the aggregate represent just one single sample of each. The bud tissues are only divided up into buds scales, flower, and air space. Many other tissues remain unlabeled. For the soil aggregate annotated labels are done by eye with no actual chemical information. Therefore particulate organic matter identification may be incorrect. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Annotated X-ray CT images and masks of a Forest Soil Aggregate. File Name: forest_soil_images_masks_for_testing_training.zipResource Description: This aggregate was collected from the riparian oak forest at the Russell Ranch Sustainable Agricultural Facility. The aggreagate was scanned using X-ray micro-computed tomography (microCT) on the X-ray μCT beamline (8.3.2) at the Advanced Light Source (ALS) in Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA USA) using the 10x objective lens with a pixel resolution of 650 nanometers. For masks, the background has a value of 0,0,0; pores spaces have a value of 250,250, 250; mineral solids have a value= 128,0,0; and particulate organic matter has a value of = 000,128,000. These files were used for training a model to segment the forest soil aggregate and for testing the accuracy, precision, recall, and f1 score of the model.Resource Title: Annotated X-ray CT images and masks of an Almond bud (P. Dulcis). File Name: Almond_bud_tube_D_P6_training_testing_images_and_masks.zipResource Description: Drought stressed almond flower bud (Prunis dulcis) from a plant housed at the University of California, Davis, was scanned by X-ray micro-computed tomography (microCT) on the X-ray μCT beamline (8.3.2) at the Advanced Light Source (ALS) in Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA USA) using the 4x lens with a pixel resolution of 1.72 µm using. For masks, the background has a value of 0,0,0; air spaces have a value of 255,255, 255; bud scales have a value= 128,0,0; and flower tissues have a value of = 000,128,000. These files were used for training a model to segment the almond bud and for testing the accuracy, precision, recall, and f1 score of the model.Resource Software Recommended: Fiji (ImageJ),url: https://imagej.net/software/fiji/downloads Resource Title: Annotated X-ray CT images and masks of Walnut leaves (J. Regia) . File Name: 6_leaf_training_testing_images_and_masks_for_paper.zipResource Description: Stems were collected from genetically unique J. regia accessions at the 117 USDA-ARS-NCGR in Wolfskill Experimental Orchard, Winters, California USA to use as scion, and were grafted by Sierra Gold Nursery onto a commonly used commercial rootstock, RX1 (J. microcarpa × J. regia). We used a common rootstock to eliminate any own-root effects and to simulate conditions for a commercial walnut orchard setting, where rootstocks are commonly used. The grafted saplings were repotted and transferred to the Armstrong lathe house facility at the University of California, Davis in June 2019, and kept under natural light and temperature. Leaves from each accession and treatment were scanned using X-ray micro-computed tomography (microCT) on the X-ray μCT beamline (8.3.2) at the Advanced Light Source (ALS) in Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA USA) using the 10x objective lens with a pixel resolution of 650 nanometers. For masks, the background has a value of 170,170,170; Epidermis value= 85,85,85; Mesophyll value= 0,0,0; Bundle Sheath Extension value= 152,152,152; Vein value= 220,220,220; Air value = 255,255,255.Resource Software Recommended: Fiji (ImageJ),url: https://imagej.net/software/fiji/downloads

This repository contains the data and results from the paper "Code Smells Detection via Code Review: An Empirical Study" submitted to ESEM 2020. 1. data folder The data folder contains the retrieved 269 reviews that discuss code smells. Each review includes four parts: Code Change URL, Code Smell Term, Code Smell Discussion, and Source Code URL. 2. scripts floder The scripts folder contains the Python script that was used to search for code smell terms and the list of code smell terms. smell-term/general_smell_terms.txt contains general code smell terms, such as "code smell". smell-term/specific_smell_terms.txt contains specific code smell terms, such as "dead code". smell-term/misspelling_terms_of_smell.txt contains the misspelling terms of 'smell', such as "ssell". get_changes.py is used for getting code changes from OpenStack. get_comments.py is used for getting review comments for each code change. smell_search.py is used for searching review comments that contain code smell terms. 3. project folder The project folder contains the MAXQDA project files. The files can be opened by MAXQDA 12 or higher versions, which are available at https://www.maxqda.com/ for download. You may also use the free 14-day trial version of MAXQDA 2018, which is available at https://www.maxqda.com/trial for download. Data Labeling & Encoding for RQ2.mx12 is the results of data labeling and encoding for RQ2, which were analyzed by the MAXQDA tool. Data Labeling & Encoding for RQ3.mx12 is the results of data labeling and encoding for RQ3, which were analyzed by the MAXQDA tool.

Manually disambiguated ground-truth for the Gnome GTK project supporting the replication of the results presented in the article "gambit – An Open Source Name Disambiguation Tool for Version Control Systems".

Please request access via zenodo.

Labeled high-resolution orthoimagery time-series of an alluvial river corridor; Elwha River, Washington, USA.

Daniel Buscombe, Marda Science LLC

There are two datasets in this data release:

1. Model training dataset. A manually (or semi-manually) labeled image dataset that was used to train and evaluate a machine (deep) learning model designed to identify subaerial accumulations of large wood, alluvial sediment, water, and vegetation in orthoimagery of alluvial river corridors in forested catchments.

2. Model output dataset. A labeled image dataset that uses the aforementioned model to estimate subaerial accumulations of large wood, alluvial sediment, water, and vegetation in a larger orthoimagery dataset of alluvial river corridors in forested catchments.

All of these label data are derived from raw gridded data that originate from the U.S. Geological Survey (Ritchie et al., 2018). That dataset consists of 14 orthoimages of the Middle Reach (MR, in between the former Aldwell and Mills reservoirs) and 14 corresponding Lower Reach (LR, downstream of the former Mills reservoir) of the Elwha River, Washington, collected between the period 2012-04-07 and 2017-09-22. That orthoimagery was generated using SfM photogrammetry (following Over et al., 2021) using a photographic camera mounted to an aircraft wing. The imagery capture channel change as it evolved under a ~20 Mt sediment pulse initiated by the removal of the two dams. The two reaches are the ~8 km long Middle Reach (MR) and the lower-gradient ~7 km long Lower Reach (LR).

The orthoimagery have been labeled (pixelwise, either manually or by an automated process) according to the following classes (inter class in the label data in parentheses):

1. vegetation / other (0)

2. water (1)

3. sediment (2)

4. large wood (3)

1. Model training dataset.

Imagery was labeled using a combination of the open-source software Doodler (Buscombe et al., 2021; https://github.com/Doodleverse/dash_doodler) and hand-digitization using QGIS at 1:300 scale, rasterizeing the polygons, and gridded and clipped in the same way as all other gridded data. Doodler facilitates relatively labor-free dense multiclass labeling of natural imagery, enabling relatively rapid training dataset creation. The final training dataset consists of 4382 images and corresponding labels, each 1024 x 1024 pixels and representing just over 5% of the total data set. The training data are sampled approximately equally in time and in space among both reaches. All training and validation samples purposefully included all four label classes, to avoid model training and evaluation problems associated with class imbalance (Buscombe and Goldstein, 2022).

Data are provided in geoTIFF format. The imagery and label grids (imagery) are reprojected to be co-located in the NAD83(2011) / UTM zone 10N projection, and to consist of 0.125 x 0.125m pixels.

Pixel-wise labels measurements such as these facilitate development and evaluation of image segmentation, image classification, object-based image-analysis (OBIA), and object-in-image detection models, and numerous potential other machine learning models for the general purposes of river corridor classification, description, enumeration, inventory, and process or state quantification. For example this dataset may serve in transfer learning contexts for application in different river or coastal environments or for different tasks or class ontologies.

Files:

1. Labels_used_for_model_training_Buscombe_Labeled_high_resolution_orthoimagery_time_series_of_an_alluvial_river_corridor_Elwha_River_Washington_USA.zip, 63 MB, label tiffs

2. Model_training_ images1of4.zip, 1.5 GB, imagery tiffs

3. Model_training_ images2of4.zip, 1.5 GB, imagery tiffs

4. Model_training_ images3of4.zip, 1.7 GB, imagery tiffs

5. Model_training_ images4of4.zip, 1.6 GB, imagery tiffs

2. Model output dataset.

Imagery was labeled using a deep-learning based semantic segmentation model (Buscombe, 2023) trained specifically for the task using the Segmentation Gym (Buscombe and Goldstein, 2022) modeling suite. We use the software package Segmentation Gym (Buscombe and Goldstein, 2022) to fine-tune a Segformer (Xie et al., 2021) deep learning model for semantic image segmentation. We take the instance (i.e. model architecture and trained weights) of the model of Xie et al. (2021), itself fine-tuned on ADE20k dataset (Zhou et al., 2019) at resolution 512x512 pixels, and fine-tune it on our 1024x1024 pixel training data consisting of 4-class label images.

The spatial extent of the imagery in the MR is 455157.2494695878122002,5316532.9804129302501678 : 457076.1244695878122002,5323771.7304129302501678. Imagery width is 15351 pixels and imagery height is 57910 pixels. The spatial extent of the imagery in the LR is 457704.9227139975992031,5326631.3750646486878395 : 459241.6727139975992031,5333311.0000646486878395. Imagery width is 12294 pixels and imagery height is 53437 pixels. Data are provided in Cloud-Optimzed geoTIFF (COG) format. The imagery and label grids (imagery) are reprojected to be co-located in the NAD83(2011) / UTM zone 10N projection, and to consist of 0.125 x 0.125m pixels. All grids have been clipped to the union of extents of active channel margins during the period of interest.

Reach-wide pixel-wise measurements such as these facilitate comparison of wood and sediment storage at any scale or location. These data may be useful for studying the morphodynamics of wood-sediment interactions in other geomorphically complex channels, wood storage in channels, the role of wood in ecosystems and conservation or restoration efforts.

Files:

1. Elwha_MR_labels_Buscombe_Labeled_high_resolution_orthoimagery_time_series_of_an_alluvial_river_corridor_Elwha_River_Washington_USA.zip, 9.67 MB, label COGs from Elwha River Middle Reach (MR)

2. ElwhaMR_ imagery_ part1_ of 2.zip, 566 MB, imagery COGs from Elwha River Middle Reach (MR)

3. ElwhaMR imagery_ part2_ of_ 2.zip, 618 MB, imagery COGs from Elwha River Middle Reach (MR)

3. Elwha_LR_labels_Buscombe_Labeled_high_resolution_orthoimagery_time_series_of_an_alluvial_river_corridor_Elwha_River_Washington_USA.zip, 10.96 MB, label COGs from Elwha River Lower Reach (LR)

4. ElwhaLR_ imagery_ part1_ of 2.zip, 622 MB, imagery COGs from Elwha River Middle Reach (MR)

5. ElwhaLR imagery_ part2_ of_ 2.zip, 617 MB, imagery COGs from Elwha River Middle Reach (MR)

This dataset was created using open-source tools of the Doodleverse, a software ecosystem for geoscientific image segmentation, by Daniel Buscombe (https://github.com/dbuscombe-usgs) and Evan Goldstein (https://github.com/ebgoldstein). Thanks to the contributors of the Doodleverse!. Thanks especially Sharon Fitzpatrick (https://github.com/2320sharon) and Jaycee Favela for contributing labels.

References

• Buscombe, D. (2023). Doodleverse/Segmentation Gym SegFormer models for 4-class (other, water, sediment, wood) segmentation of RGB aerial orthomosaic imagery (v1.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8172858

• Buscombe, D., Goldstein, E. B., Sherwood, C. R., Bodine, C., Brown, J. A., Favela, J., et al. (2021). Human-in-the-loop segmentation of Earth surface imagery. Earth and Space Science, 9, e2021EA002085. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA002085

• Buscombe, D., & Goldstein, E. B. (2022). A reproducible and reusable pipeline for segmentation of geoscientific imagery. Earth and Space Science, 9, e2022EA002332. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EA002332 See: https://github.com/Doodleverse/segmentation_gym

• Over, J.R., Ritchie, A.C., Kranenburg, C.J., Brown, J.A., Buscombe, D., Noble, T., Sherwood, C.R., Warrick, J.A., and Wernette, P.A., 2021, Processing coastal imagery with Agisoft Metashape Professional Edition, version 1.6—Structure from motion workflow documentation: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2021–1039, 46 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20211039.

• Ritchie, A.C., Curran, C.A., Magirl, C.S., Bountry, J.A., Hilldale, R.C., Randle, T.J., and Duda, J.J., 2018, Data in support of 5-year sediment budget and morphodynamic analysis of Elwha River following dam removals: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/F7PG1QWC.

• Xie, E., Wang, W., Yu, Z., Anandkumar, A., Alvarez, J.M. and Luo, P., 2021. SegFormer: Simple and efficient design for semantic segmentation with transformers. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34, pp.12077-12090.

• Zhou, B., Zhao, H., Puig, X., Xiao, T., Fidler, S., Barriuso, A. and Torralba, A., 2019. Semantic understanding of scenes through the ade20k dataset. International Journal of Computer Vision, 127, pp.302-321.

Label-free quantification based on data-independent acquisition (DIA) workflows is increasingly popular. Several software tools have been recently published or are commercially available. The present study focuses on the critical evaluation of three different software packages (Progenesis, synapter and ISOQuant) supporting ion-mobility enhanced DIA data. In order to benchmark the label-free quantification performance of the different tools, we generated two hybrid proteome samples of defined quantitative composition containing tryptically digested proteomes of three different species (mouse, yeast, E.coli). This model data set simulates complex biological samples containing large numbers of both unregulated (background) proteins as well as up- and down-regulated proteins with exactly known ratios between samples. We determined the number and dynamic range of quantifiable proteins and analyzed the influence of applied algorithms (retention time alignment, clustering, normalization, etc.) on the variation of reported protein quantities between technical replicates.

The inherent diversity of approaches in proteomics research has led to a wide range of software solutions for data analysis. These software solutions encompass multiple tools, each employing different algorithms for various tasks such as peptide-spectrum matching, protein inference, quantification, statistical analysis, and visualization. To enable an unbiased comparison of commonly used bottom-up label-free proteomics workflows, we introduce WOMBAT-P, a versatile platform designed for automated benchmarking and comparison. WOMBAT-P simplifies the processing of public data by utilizing the sample and data relationship format for proteomics (SDRF-Proteomics) as input. This feature streamlines the analysis of annotated local or public ProteomeXchange data sets, promoting efficient comparisons among diverse outputs. Through an evaluation using experimental ground truth data and a realistic biological data set, we uncover significant disparities and a limited overlap in the quantified proteins. WOMBAT-P not only enables rapid execution and seamless comparison of workflows but also provides valuable insights into the capabilities of different software solutions. These benchmarking metrics are a valuable resource for researchers in selecting the most suitable workflow for their specific data sets. The modular architecture of WOMBAT-P promotes extensibility and customization. The software is available at https://github.com/wombat-p/WOMBAT-Pipelines.

Data from: Label-free timing analysis of SiPM-based modularized detectors with physics-constrained deep learning

Introduction

This repository holds the computer code and raw data to reproduce the results in the paper: Label-free timing analysis of SiPM-based modularized detectors with physics-constrained deep learning

Pulse timing is an important topic in nuclear instrumentation, with far-reaching applications from high energy physics to radiation imaging. While high-speed analog-to-digital converters become more and more developed and accessible, their potential uses and merits in nuclear detector signal processing are still uncertain, partially due to associated timing algorithms which are not fully understood and utilized.

In the paper "Label-free timing analysis of SiPM-based modularized detectors with physics-constrained deep learning", we propose a novel method based on deep learning for timing analysis of modularized detectors without explicit needs of labelling event da...

Modern mass spectrometry setups used in today’s proteomics studies generate vast amounts of raw data, calling for highly efficient data processing and analysis tools. Software for analyzing these data is either monolithic (easy to use, but sometimes too rigid) or workflow-driven (easy to customize, but sometimes complex). Thermo Proteome Discoverer (PD) is a powerful software for workflow-driven data analysis in proteomics which, in our eyes, achieves a good trade-off between flexibility and usability. Here, we present two open-source plugins for PD providing additional functionality: LFQProfiler for label-free quantification of peptides and proteins, and RNPxl for UV-induced peptide–RNA cross-linking data analysis. LFQProfiler interacts with existing PD nodes for peptide identification and validation and takes care of the entire quantitative part of the workflow. We show that it performs at least on par with other state-of-the-art software solutions for label-free quantification in a recently published benchmark (Ramus, C.; J. Proteomics 2016, 132, 51–62). The second workflow, RNPxl, represents the first software solution to date for identification of peptide–RNA cross-links including automatic localization of the cross-links at amino acid resolution and localization scoring. It comes with a customized integrated cross-link fragment spectrum viewer for convenient manual inspection and validation of the results.

In spite of its central role in biology and disease, protein turnover is a largely understudied aspect of most proteomic studies due to the complexity of computational workflows that analyze in vivo turnover rates. To address this need, we developed a new computational tool, TurnoveR, to accurately calculate protein turnover rates from mass spectrometric analysis of metabolic labeling experiments in Skyline, a free and open-source proteomics software platform. TurnoveR is a straightforward graphical interface that enables seamless integration of protein turnover analysis into a traditional proteomics workflow in Skyline, allowing users to take advantage of the advanced and flexible data visualization and curation features built into the software. The computational pipeline of TurnoveR performs critical steps to determine protein turnover rates, including isotopologue demultiplexing, precursor-pool correction, statistical analysis, and generation of data reports and visualizations. This workflow is compatible with many mass spectrometric platforms and recapitulates turnover rates and differential changes in turnover rates between treatment groups calculated in previous studies. We expect that the addition of TurnoveR to the widely used Skyline proteomics software will facilitate wider utilization of protein turnover analysis in highly relevant biological models, including aging, neurodegeneration, and skeletal muscle atrophy.

High-throughput multiplexed protein quantification using mass spectrometry is steadily increasing in popularity, with the two major techniques being data-dependent acquisition (DDA) and targeted acquisition using selected reaction monitoring (SRM). However, both techniques involve extensive data processing, which can be performed by a multitude of different software solutions. Analysis of quantitative LC-MS/MS data is mainly performed in three major steps: processing of raw data, normalization, and statistical analysis. To evaluate the impact of data processing steps, we developed two new benchmark data sets, one each for DDA and SRM, with samples consisting of a long-range dilution series of synthetic peptides spiked in a total cell protein digest. The generated data were processed by eight different software workflows and three postprocessing steps. The results show that the choice of the raw data processing software and the postprocessing steps play an important role in the final outcome. Also, the linear dynamic range of the DDA data could be extended by an order of magnitude through feature alignment and a charge state merging algorithm proposed here. Furthermore, the benchmark data sets are made publicly available for further benchmarking and software developments.

Snapshot img

Thermal Printing Market Size 2025-2029

The thermal printing market size is forecast to increase by USD 12.39 billion, at a CAGR of 4.4% between 2024 and 2029.

The market is witnessing significant growth due to several key trends. The increasing e-commerce industry is driving the demand for thermal printing technology as it is widely used in shipping and logistics for labeling and tracking purposes. Product innovations, such as the development of thermal printers with higher print resolution and faster print speeds, are also contributing to market growth. Furthermore, the availability of viable alternatives, such as inkjet and laser printing, is pushing thermal printing manufacturers to improve their offerings and offer competitive pricing. These trends are expected to continue shaping the market in the coming years. However, challenges such as the high initial investment cost and the need for regular maintenance and replacement of thermal print heads may hinder market growth.

What will be the Size of the Market During the Forecast Period?

Request Free Sample

The market in the healthcare sector is witnessing significant growth due to the increasing demand for patient flow optimization and improved healthcare data management. Thermal printer software solutions are increasingly being adopted for their ability to provide cost-effective, on-demand label printing for various applications, including patient identification systems, medicine allergy labels, and RFID tag printing. Wireless printing solutions are gaining popularity in healthcare settings due to their convenience and mobility. These solutions enable remote data capture and integration with mobile Point of Sale (POS) systems, healthcare data management software, and mobile workforce solutions. Healthcare asset tracking is another area where thermal printing plays a crucial role, with RFID label printers being used to create high-resolution graphics labels for asset tracking and management.
RFID label design is an essential aspect of thermal printing in healthcare, as these labels are used to capture and manage critical data related to patient identification, medicine allergies, and product tracking. Barcode printing solutions are also widely used in healthcare for data capture and patient data management. The use of barcode technology enables quick and accurate data entry and reduces the risk of errors, making it an essential component of healthcare data management. Mobile printing and mobile device management are becoming increasingly important in healthcare, with mobile devices being used extensively for data collection and patient tracking. Mobile device accessories, such as barcode scanners and mobile pos systems, are being integrated with thermal printer software to provide mobile workforce solutions that enable healthcare professionals to access critical information on the go.

How is this market segmented and which is the largest segment?

The market research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD billion' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments.

Type

  Industrial format
  Desktop format
  Mobile format


Technology

  Direct thermal (DT)
  Thermal transfer (TT)
  Dye diffusion thermal transfer (D2T2)


Geography

  North America

    US


  Europe

    Germany
    UK
    France
    Spain


  APAC

    China
    India
    Japan
    South Korea


  South America

    Brazil


  Middle East and Africa

By Type Insights

The industrial format segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.

The market is witnessing notable growth due to technological advancements and strategic partnerships. An illustrative collaboration occurred in January 2023 between Brother Mobile Solutions and TEKLYNX. Brother Mobile Solutions, a prominent supplier of mobile, desktop, and industrial printing solutions, joined forces with TEKLYNX, a global leader in barcode label software. This partnership significantly enhances Brother Mobile Solutions' range of commercial and industrial thermal barcode label printers, making them fully compatible with TEKLYNX software solutions. This development enables enterprises to design and print barcode labels that adhere to industry standards, thereby expanding Brother Mobile Solutions' product offerings and catering to the increasing demand for advanced digital packaging and labeling solutions. The partnership underscores the industry's ongoing evolution, driven by technological innovations and strategic alliances.

Get a glance at the market report of share of various segments Request Free Sample

The industrial format segment was valued at USD 22.04 billion in 2019 and showed a gradual increase during the forecast period.

Regional Analysis

North America is estimated to c

Large-scale proteome analysis requires rapid and high-throughput analytical methods. We recently reported a new paradigm in proteome analysis where direct infusion and ion mobility are used instead of liquid chromatography (LC) to achieve rapid and high-throughput proteome analysis. Here, we introduce an improved direct infusion shotgun proteome analysis protocol including label-free quantification (DISPA-LFQ) using CsoDIAq software. With CsoDIAq analysis of DISPA data, we can now identify up to ∼2000 proteins from the HeLa and 293T proteomes, and with DISPA-LFQ, we can quantify ∼1000 proteins from no more than 1 μg of sample within minutes. The identified proteins are involved in numerous valuable pathways including central carbon metabolism, nucleic acid replication and transport, protein synthesis, and endocytosis. Together with a high-throughput sample preparation method in a 96-well plate, we further demonstrate the utility of this technology for performing high-throughput drug analysis in human 293T cells. The total time for data collection from a whole 96-well plate is approximately 8 h. We conclude that the DISPA-LFQ strategy presents a valuable tool for fast identification and quantification of proteins in complex mixtures, which will power a high-throughput proteomic era of drug screening, biomarker discovery, and clinical analysis.

This is the complementary material for the paper: "An Industrial Survey on the Relationships between Software Architecture and Source Code", which is currently under review. We provide a brief description of the files.

1. Valid Responses of the Questionnaire.xlsx comprises the 87 valid survey responses that were collected by sending the questionnaire to 1000 participants.

2. Interview Transcript includes eight files (Interview Transcript_IP1.docx - Interview Transcript_IP8.docx) of the interview transcripts from eight practitioners.

3. Data Labeling & Encoding.mx18 is the results of data labeling and encoding that were analyzed by the MAXQDA tool. We extracted the answers of open questions from the questionnaire and interview instrument, labeled them with the number of respondents and interviewees (e.g., Respondent1, Respondent2, Interview Transcript_IP1), and encoded the extracted data using Grounded Theory. The file can be opened by MAXQDA 18 or higher versions, which are available at https://www.maxqda.com/ for download. You may also use the free 14-day trial version of MAXQDA 2018, which is available at https://www.maxqda.com/trial for download.

Context and Aim

Deep learning in Earth Observation requires large image archives with highly reliable labels for model training and testing. However, a preferable quality standard for forest applications in Europe has not yet been determined. The TreeSatAI consortium investigated numerous sources for annotated datasets as an alternative to manually labeled training datasets.

We found the federal forest inventory of Lower Saxony, Germany represents an unseen treasure of annotated samples for training data generation. The respective 20-cm Color-infrared (CIR) imagery, which is used for forestry management through visual interpretation, constitutes an excellent baseline for deep learning tasks such as image segmentation and classification.

Description

The data archive is highly suitable for benchmarking as it represents the real-world data situation of many German forest management services. One the one hand, it has a high number of samples which are supported by the high-resolution aerial imagery. On the other hand, this data archive presents challenges, including class label imbalances between the different forest stand types.

The TreeSatAI Benchmark Archive contains:

• 50,381 image triplets (aerial, Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2)

• synchronized time steps and locations

• all original spectral bands/polarizations from the sensors

• 20 species classes (single labels)

• 12 age classes (single labels)

• 15 genus classes (multi labels)

• 60 m and 200 m patches

• fixed split for train (90%) and test (10%) data

• additional single labels such as English species name, genus, forest stand type, foliage type, land cover

The geoTIFF and GeoJSON files are readable in any GIS software, such as QGIS. For further information, we refer to the PDF document in the archive and publications in the reference section.

Version history

v1.0.0 - First release

Citation

Ahlswede et al. (in prep.)

GitHub

Full code examples and pre-trained models from the dataset article (Ahlswede et al. 2022) using the TreeSatAI Benchmark Archive are published on the GitHub repositories of the Remote Sensing Image Analysis (RSiM) Group (https://git.tu-berlin.de/rsim/treesat_benchmark). Code examples for the sampling strategy can be made available by Christian Schulz via email request.

Folder structure

We refer to the proposed folder structure in the PDF file.

• Folder “aerial” contains the aerial imagery patches derived from summertime orthophotos of the years 2011 to 2020. Patches are available in 60 x 60 m (304 x 304 pixels). Band order is near-infrared, red, green, and blue. Spatial resolution is 20 cm.

• Folder “s1” contains the Sentinel-1 imagery patches derived from summertime mosaics of the years 2015 to 2020. Patches are available in 60 x 60 m (6 x 6 pixels) and 200 x 200 m (20 x 20 pixels). Band order is VV, VH, and VV/VH ratio. Spatial resolution is 10 m.

• Folder “s2” contains the Sentinel-2 imagery patches derived from summertime mosaics of the years 2015 to 2020. Patches are available in 60 x 60 m (6 x 6 pixels) and 200 x 200 m (20 x 20 pixels). Band order is B02, B03, B04, B08, B05, B06, B07, B8A, B11, B12, B01, and B09. Spatial resolution is 10 m.

• The folder “labels” contains a JSON string which was used for multi-labeling of the training patches. Code example of an image sample with respective proportions of 94% for Abies and 6% for Larix is: "Abies_alba_3_834_WEFL_NLF.tif": [["Abies", 0.93771], ["Larix", 0.06229]]

• The two files “test_filesnames.lst” and “train_filenames.lst” define the filenames used for train (90%) and test (10%) split. We refer to this fixed split for better reproducibility and comparability.

• The folder “geojson” contains geoJSON files with all the samples chosen for the derivation of training patch generation (point, 60 m bounding box, 200 m bounding box).

CAUTION: As we could not upload the aerial patches as a single zip file on Zenodo, you need to download the 20 single species files (aerial_60m_…zip) separately. Then, unzip them into a folder named “aerial” with a subfolder named “60m”. This structure is recommended for better reproducibility and comparability to the experimental results of Ahlswede et al. (2022),

Join the archive

Model training, benchmarking, algorithm development… many applications are possible! Feel free to add samples from other regions in Europe or even worldwide. Additional remote sensing data from Lidar, UAVs or aerial imagery from different time steps are very welcome. This helps the research community in development of better deep learning and machine learning models for forest applications. You might have questions or want to share code/results/publications using that archive? Feel free to contact the authors.

Project description

This work was part of the project TreeSatAI (Artificial Intelligence with Satellite data and Multi-Source Geodata for Monitoring of Trees at Infrastructures, Nature Conservation Sites and Forests). Its overall aim is the development of AI methods for the monitoring of forests and woody features on a local, regional and global scale. Based on freely available geodata from different sources (e.g., remote sensing, administration maps, and social media), prototypes will be developed for the deep learning-based extraction and classification of tree- and tree stand features. These prototypes deal with real cases from the monitoring of managed forests, nature conservation and infrastructures. The development of the resulting services by three enterprises (liveEO, Vision Impulse and LUP Potsdam) will be supported by three research institutes (German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence, TU Remote Sensing Image Analysis Group, TUB Geoinformation in Environmental Planning Lab).

Publications

Ahlswede et al. (2022, in prep.): TreeSatAI Dataset Publication

Ahlswede S., Nimisha, T.M., and Demir, B. (2022, in revision): Embedded Self-Enhancement Maps for Weakly Supervised Tree Species Mapping in Remote Sensing Images. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens

Schulz et al. (2022, in prep.): Phenoprofiling

Conference contributions

S. Ahlswede, N. T. Madam, C. Schulz, B. Kleinschmit and B. Demіr, "Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentation of Remote Sensing Images for Tree Species Classification Based on Explanation Methods", IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2022.

C. Schulz, M. Förster, S. Vulova, T. Gränzig and B. Kleinschmit, “Exploring the temporal fingerprints of mid-European forest types from Sentinel-1 RVI and Sentinel-2 NDVI time series”, IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2022.

C. Schulz, M. Förster, S. Vulova and B. Kleinschmit, “The temporal fingerprints of common European forest types from SAR and optical remote sensing data”, AGU Fall Meeting, New Orleans, USA, 2021.

B. Kleinschmit, M. Förster, C. Schulz, F. Arias, B. Demir, S. Ahlswede, A. K. Aksoy, T. Ha Minh, J. Hees, C. Gava, P. Helber, B. Bischke, P. Habelitz, A. Frick, R. Klinke, S. Gey, D. Seidel, S. Przywarra, R. Zondag and B. Odermatt, “Artificial Intelligence with Satellite data and Multi-Source Geodata for Monitoring of Trees and Forests”, Living Planet Symposium, Bonn, Germany, 2022.

C. Schulz, M. Förster, S. Vulova, T. Gränzig and B. Kleinschmit, (2022, submitted): “Exploring the temporal fingerprints of sixteen mid-European forest types from Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 time series”, ForestSAT, Berlin, Germany, 2022.

This is the second version of the Google Landmarks dataset (GLDv2), which contains images annotated with labels representing human-made and natural landmarks. The dataset can be used for landmark recognition and retrieval experiments. This version of the dataset contains approximately 5 million images, split into 3 sets of images: train, index and test. The dataset was presented in our CVPR'20 paper. In this repository, we present download links for all dataset files and relevant code for metric computation. This dataset was associated to two Kaggle challenges, on landmark recognition and landmark retrieval. Results were discussed as part of a CVPR'19 workshop. In this repository, we also provide scores for the top 10 teams in the challenges, based on the latest ground-truth version. Please visit the challenge and workshop webpages for more details on the data, tasks and technical solutions from top teams.

Presented is a data set for benchmarking MS1-based label-free quantitative proteomics using a quadrupole orbitrap mass spectrometer. Escherichia coli digest was spiked into a HeLa digest in four different concentrations, simulating protein expression differences in a background of an unchanged complex proteome. The data set provides a unique opportunity to evaluate the proteomic platform (instrumentation and software) in its ability to perform MS1-intensity-based label-free quantification. We show that the presented combination of informatics and instrumentation produces high precision and quantification accuracy. The data were also used to compare different quantitative protein inference methods such as iBAQ and Hi-N. The data can also be used as a resource for development and optimization of proteomics informatics tools, thus the raw data have been deposited to ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD001385.

We evaluated the state of label-free discovery proteomics focusing especially on technological contributions and contributions of naturally occurring differences in protein abundance to the intersample variability in protein abundance estimates in this highly peptide-centric technology. First, the performance of popular quantitative proteomics software, Proteome Discoverer, Scaffold, MaxQuant, and Progenesis QIP, was benchmarked using their default parameters and some modified settings. Beyond this, the intersample variability in protein abundance estimates was decomposed into variability introduced by the entire technology itself and variable protein amounts inherent to individual plants of the Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 accession. The technical component was considerably higher than the biological intersample variability, suggesting an effect on the degree and validity of reported biological changes in protein abundance. Surprisingly, the biological variability, protein abundance estimates, and protein fold changes were recorded differently by the software used to quantify the proteins, warranting caution in the comparison of discovery proteomics results. As expected, ∼99% of the proteome was invariant in the isogenic plants in the absence of environmental factors; however, few proteins showed substantial quantitative variability. This naturally occurring variation between individual organisms can have an impact on the causality of reported protein fold changes.