The Easiest Way to Collect Data from the Internet Download anything you see on the internet into spreadsheets within a few clicks using our ready-made web crawlers or a few lines of code using our APIs

We have made it as simple as possible to collect data from websites

Easy to Use Crawlers Amazon Product Details and Pricing Scraper Amazon Product Details and Pricing Scraper Get product information, pricing, FBA, best seller rank, and much more from Amazon.

Google Maps Search Results Google Maps Search Results Get details like place name, phone number, address, website, ratings, and open hours from Google Maps or Google Places search results.

Twitter Scraper Twitter Scraper Get tweets, Twitter handle, content, number of replies, number of retweets, and more. All you need to provide is a URL to a profile, hashtag, or an advance search URL from Twitter.

Amazon Product Reviews and Ratings Amazon Product Reviews and Ratings Get customer reviews for any product on Amazon and get details like product name, brand, reviews and ratings, and more from Amazon.

Google Reviews Scraper Google Reviews Scraper Scrape Google reviews and get details like business or location name, address, review, ratings, and more for business and places.

Walmart Product Details & Pricing Walmart Product Details & Pricing Get the product name, pricing, number of ratings, reviews, product images, URL other product-related data from Walmart.

Amazon Search Results Scraper Amazon Search Results Scraper Get product search rank, pricing, availability, best seller rank, and much more from Amazon.

Amazon Best Sellers Amazon Best Sellers Get the bestseller rank, product name, pricing, number of ratings, rating, product images, and more from any Amazon Bestseller List.

Google Search Scraper Google Search Scraper Scrape Google search results and get details like search rank, paid and organic results, knowledge graph, related search results, and more.

Walmart Product Reviews & Ratings Walmart Product Reviews & Ratings Get customer reviews for any product on Walmart.com and get details like product name, brand, reviews, and ratings.

Scrape Emails and Contact Details Scrape Emails and Contact Details Get emails, addresses, contact numbers, social media links from any website.

Walmart Search Results Scraper Walmart Search Results Scraper Get Product details such as pricing, availability, reviews, ratings, and more from Walmart search results and categories.

Glassdoor Job Listings Glassdoor Job Listings Scrape job details such as job title, salary, job description, location, company name, number of reviews, and ratings from Glassdoor.

Indeed Job Listings Indeed Job Listings Scrape job details such as job title, salary, job description, location, company name, number of reviews, and ratings from Indeed.

LinkedIn Jobs Scraper Premium LinkedIn Jobs Scraper Scrape job listings on LinkedIn and extract job details such as job title, job description, location, company name, number of reviews, and more.

Redfin Scraper Premium Redfin Scraper Scrape real estate listings from Redfin. Extract property details such as address, price, mortgage, redfin estimate, broker name and more.

Yelp Business Details Scraper Yelp Business Details Scraper Scrape business details from Yelp such as phone number, address, website, and more from Yelp search and business details page.

Zillow Scraper Premium Zillow Scraper Scrape real estate listings from Zillow. Extract property details such as address, price, Broker, broker name and more.

Amazon product offers and third party sellers Amazon product offers and third party sellers Get product pricing, delivery details, FBA, seller details, and much more from the Amazon offer listing page.

Realtor Scraper Premium Realtor Scraper Scrape real estate listings from Realtor.com. Extract property details such as Address, Price, Area, Broker and more.

Target Product Details & Pricing Target Product Details & Pricing Get product details from search results and category pages such as pricing, availability, rating, reviews, and 20+ data points from Target.

Trulia Scraper Premium Trulia Scraper Scrape real estate listings from Trulia. Extract property details such as Address, Price, Area, Mortgage and more.

Amazon Customer FAQs Amazon Customer FAQs Get FAQs for any product on Amazon and get details like the question, answer, answered user name, and more.

Yellow Pages Scraper Yellow Pages Scraper Get details like business name, phone number, address, website, ratings, and more from Yellow Pages search results.

Note:- Only publicly available Legal data can be worked upon.

Unlock a world of legal information with APISCRAPY's user-friendly services – Federal Court Data, State Court Record Data, legal data scraping, and PACER Data. We've made it simple for anyone, from legal professionals to researchers and businesses, to access over 100 million publicly available legal records.

Our Federal Court Data service provides details on federal legal matters, while State Court Record Data gives insights into state-level legal proceedings. With our legal data scraping capabilities, we ensure you have access to the information you need without any hassle. Plus, our integration with PACER Data ensures a comprehensive and reliable source for legal records.

Key Features:

Federal Court Data: Get insights into legal matters at the federal level, all at your fingertips.

State Court Record Data: Access information on legal proceedings at the state level, tailored to your specific needs.

Legal Data Scraping Made Easy: We've simplified the process of gathering legal data, making it accessible for everyone.

PACER Data Integration: Our platform integrates seamlessly with PACER Data, ensuring a reliable and complete source of legal records.

Over 100 Million Records: APISCRAPY provides access to a vast database of over 100 million publicly available legal records, offering unparalleled insights.

Whether you're a legal professional, researcher, or business looking for easy access to legal information, APISCRAPY's services cater to your needs. Choose us for straightforward and comprehensive legal data services, where simplicity and accessibility meet for your convenience.

[ Related Tags: public court records, online court records, federal court cases, Federal court case number search, find Federal court cases, court case by state, court Datasets, state court data, supreme court data, USA court datasets, Federal Court Data API , Litigation Data, Legal Data, Legal API, Legal Law, Legal Court records, Crime records, County court Datasets, All county court Datasets, Legal Analytics, Legal Intelligence, Legal Research, Attorney Data, Legal Parties Data, Judge Data, Case Research, Data Integration, US legal Data API, pacer case locator, pacer court records, free pacer search, pacer criminal case search, federal courts pacer, pacer API , pacer case locator free ]

Context

The Google Merchandise Store sells Google branded merchandise. The data is typical of what you would see for an ecommerce website.

Content

The sample dataset contains Google Analytics 360 data from the Google Merchandise Store, a real ecommerce store. The Google Merchandise Store sells Google branded merchandise. The data is typical of what you would see for an ecommerce website. It includes the following kinds of information:

Traffic source data: information about where website visitors originate. This includes data about organic traffic, paid search traffic, display traffic, etc. Content data: information about the behavior of users on the site. This includes the URLs of pages that visitors look at, how they interact with content, etc. Transactional data: information about the transactions that occur on the Google Merchandise Store website.

Fork this kernel to get started.

Acknowledgements

Data from: https://bigquery.cloud.google.com/table/bigquery-public-data:google_analytics_sample.ga_sessions_20170801

Banner Photo by Edho Pratama from Unsplash.

Inspiration

What is the total number of transactions generated per device browser in July 2017?

The real bounce rate is defined as the percentage of visits with a single pageview. What was the real bounce rate per traffic source?

What was the average number of product pageviews for users who made a purchase in July 2017?

What was the average number of product pageviews for users who did not make a purchase in July 2017?

What was the average total transactions per user that made a purchase in July 2017?

What is the average amount of money spent per session in July 2017?

What is the sequence of pages viewed?

The Small Business Administration maintains the Dynamic Small Business Search (DSBS) database. As a small business registers in the System for Award Management, there is an opportunity to fill out the small business profile. The information provided populates DSBS. DSBS is another tool contracting officers use to identify potential small business contractors for upcoming contracting opportunities. Small businesses can also use DSBS to identify other small businesses for teaming and joint venturing.

Multivariate Time-Series (MTS) are ubiquitous, and are generated in areas as disparate as sensor recordings in aerospace systems, music and video streams, medical monitoring, and financial systems. Domain experts are often interested in searching for interesting multivariate patterns from these MTS databases which can contain up to several gigabytes of data. Surprisingly, research on MTS search is very limited. Most existing work only supports queries with the same length of data, or queries on a fixed set of variables. In this paper, we propose an efficient and flexible subsequence search framework for massive MTS databases, that, for the first time, enables querying on any subset of variables with arbitrary time delays between them. We propose two provably correct algorithms to solve this problem — (1) an R-tree Based Search (RBS) which uses Minimum Bounding Rectangles (MBR) to organize the subsequences, and (2) a List Based Search (LBS) algorithm which uses sorted lists for indexing. We demonstrate the performance of these algorithms using two large MTS databases from the aviation domain, each containing several millions of observations. Both these tests show that our algorithms have very high prune rates (>95%) thus needing actual disk access for only less than 5% of the observations. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first flexible MTS search algorithm capable of subsequence search on any subset of variables. Moreover, MTS subsequence search has never been attempted on datasets of the size we have used in this paper.

Scanned Right of Way (ROW) Query - You can now request these same well files, well logs, and well data as a free download through the File Request System ( https://www.data.bsee.gov/Other/FileRequestSystem/Default.aspx ). The Disc Media Store will be removed at some point in the future.

As of January 2025, online search engine Bing accounted for 12.23 percent of the global desktop search market, while market leader Google had a share of around 78.83 percent. Meanwhile, Yahoo's market share was 3.07 percent. Google in the global market Ever since the introduction of Google Search in 1997, the company has dominated the search engine market, while the shares of all other tools has been rather lopsided. The majority of Google revenues are generated through advertising. Its parent corporation, Alphabet, was one of the biggest internet companies worldwide as of 2023, with a market capitalization of 1,6 trillion U.S. dollars. The company has also expanded its services to mail, productivity tools, enterprise products, mobile devices, and other ventures. As a result, Google earned one of the highest tech company revenues in 2023 with roughly 305.6 billion U.S. dollars. Search engine usage in different countries Google is the most frequently used search engine worldwide. But in some countries, its’ alternatives are leading or competing with it to some extent. As of the last quarter of 2023, more than 63 percent of internet users in Russia used Yandex, whereas Google users were nearly 36 percent. Meanwhile, Baidu was the most used search engine in China, despite a strong percentage decrease of internet users in the country accessing it. In other countries, like Japan and Mexico, people tend to use Yahoo along with Google. In the first quarter of 2022 nearly 56 percent of the respondents in Japan said that they had used Yahoo in the past four weeks. In the same year, over 27 percent of users in Mexico said they used Yahoo. Another search engine, Bing, operated by Microsoft, was the second most popular search engine in the United Kingdom after Google.

This description is part of the blog post "Systematic Literature Review of teaching Open Science" https://sozmethode.hypotheses.org/839

According to my opinion, we do not pay enough attention to teaching Open Science in higher education. Therefore, I designed a seminar to teach students the practices of Open Science by doing qualitative research.About this seminar, I wrote the article ”Teaching Open Science and qualitative methods“. For the article ”Teaching Open Science and qualitative methods“, I started to review the literature on ”Teaching Open Science“. The result of my literature review is that certain aspects of Open Science are used for teaching. However, Open Science with all its aspects (Open Access, Open Data, Open Methodology, Open Science Evaluation and Open Science Tools) is not an issue in publications about teaching.

Based on this insight, I have started a systematic literature review. I realized quickly that I need help to analyse and interpret the articles and to evaluate my preliminary findings. Especially different disciplinary cultures of teaching different aspects of Open Science are challenging, as I myself, as a social scientist, do not have enough insight to be able to interpret the results correctly. Therefore, I would like to invite you to participate in this research project!

I am now looking for people who would like to join a collaborative process to further explore and write the systematic literature review on “Teaching Open Science“. Because I want to turn this project into a Massive Open Online Paper (MOOP). According to the 10 rules of Tennant et al (2019) on MOOPs, it is crucial to find a core group that is enthusiastic about the topic. Therefore, I am looking for people who are interested in creating the structure of the paper and writing the paper together with me. I am also looking for people who want to search for and review literature or evaluate the literature I have already found. Together with the interested persons I would then define, the rules for the project (cf. Tennant et al. 2019). So if you are interested to contribute to the further search for articles and / or to enhance the interpretation and writing of results, please get in touch. For everyone interested to contribute, the list of articles collected so far is freely accessible at Zotero: https://www.zotero.org/groups/2359061/teaching_open_science. The figure shown below provides a first overview of my ongoing work. I created the figure with the free software yEd and uploaded the file to zenodo, so everyone can download and work with it:

To make transparent what I have done so far, I will first introduce what a systematic literature review is. Secondly, I describe the decisions I made to start with the systematic literature review. Third, I present the preliminary results.

Systematic literature review – an Introduction

Systematic literature reviews “are a method of mapping out areas of uncertainty, and identifying where little or no relevant research has been done.” (Petticrew/Roberts 2008: 2). Fink defines the systematic literature review as a “systemic, explicit, and reproducible method for identifying, evaluating, and synthesizing the existing body of completed and recorded work produced by researchers, scholars, and practitioners.” (Fink 2019: 6). The aim of a systematic literature reviews is to surpass the subjectivity of a researchers’ search for literature. However, there can never be an objective selection of articles. This is because the researcher has for example already made a preselection by deciding about search strings, for example “Teaching Open Science”. In this respect, transparency is the core criteria for a high-quality review.

In order to achieve high quality and transparency, Fink (2019: 6-7) proposes the following seven steps:

1. Selecting a research question.
2. Selecting the bibliographic database.
3. Choosing the search terms.
4. Applying practical screening criteria.
5. Applying methodological screening criteria.
6. Doing the review.
7. Synthesizing the results.

I have adapted these steps for the “Teaching Open Science” systematic literature review. In the following, I will present the decisions I have made.

Systematic literature review – decisions I made

1. Research question: I am interested in the following research questions: How is Open Science taught in higher education? Is Open Science taught in its full range with all aspects like Open Access, Open Data, Open Methodology, Open Science Evaluation and Open Science Tools? Which aspects are taught? Are there disciplinary differences as to which aspects are taught and, if so, why are there such differences?
2. Databases: I started my search at the Directory of Open Science (DOAJ). “DOAJ is a community-curated online directory that indexes and provides access to high quality, open access, peer-reviewed journals.” (https://doaj.org/) Secondly, I used the Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (base). Base is operated by Bielefeld University Library and “one of the world’s most voluminous search engines especially for academic web resources” (base-search.net). Both platforms are non-commercial and focus on Open Access publications and thus differ from the commercial publication databases, such as Web of Science and Scopus. For this project, I deliberately decided against commercial providers and the restriction of search in indexed journals. Thus, because my explicit aim was to find articles that are open in the context of Open Science.
3. Search terms: To identify articles about teaching Open Science I used the following search strings: “teaching open science” OR teaching “open science” OR teach „open science“. The topic search looked for the search strings in title, abstract and keywords of articles. Since these are very narrow search terms, I decided to broaden the method. I searched in the reference lists of all articles that appear from this search for further relevant literature. Using Google Scholar I checked which other authors cited the articles in the sample. If the so checked articles met my methodological criteria, I included them in the sample and looked through the reference lists and citations at Google Scholar. This process has not yet been completed.
4. Practical screening criteria: I have included English and German articles in the sample, as I speak these languages (articles in other languages are very welcome, if there are people who can interpret them!). In the sample only journal articles, articles in edited volumes, working papers and conference papers from proceedings were included. I checked whether the journals were predatory journals – such articles were not included. I did not include blogposts, books or articles from newspapers. I only included articles that fulltexts are accessible via my institution (University of Kassel). As a result, recently published articles at Elsevier could not be included because of the special situation in Germany regarding the Project DEAL (https://www.projekt-deal.de/about-deal/). For articles that are not freely accessible, I have checked whether there is an accessible version in a repository or whether preprint is available. If this was not the case, the article was not included. I started the analysis in May 2019.
5. Methodological criteria: The method described above to check the reference lists has the problem of subjectivity. Therefore, I hope that other people will be interested in this project and evaluate my decisions. I have used the following criteria as the basis for my decisions: First, the articles must focus on teaching. For example, this means that articles must describe how a course was designed and carried out. Second, at least one aspect of Open Science has to be addressed. The aspects can be very diverse (FOSS, repositories, wiki, data management, etc.) but have to comply with the principles of openness. This means, for example, I included an article when it deals with the use of FOSS in class and addresses the aspects of openness of FOSS. I did not include articles when the authors describe the use of a particular free and open source software for teaching but did not address the principles of openness or re-use.
6. Doing the review: Due to the methodical approach of going through the reference lists, it is possible to create a map of how the articles relate to each other. This results in thematic clusters and connections between clusters. The starting point for the map were four articles (Cook et al. 2018; Marsden, Thompson, and Plonsky 2017; Petras et al. 2015; Toelch and Ostwald 2018) that I found using the databases and criteria described above. I used yEd to generate the network. „yEd is a powerful desktop application that can be used to quickly and effectively generate high-quality diagrams.” (https://www.yworks.com/products/yed) In the network, arrows show, which articles are cited in an article and which articles are cited by others as well. In addition, I made an initial rough classification of the content using colours. This classification is based on the contents mentioned in the articles’ title and abstract. This rough content classification requires a more exact, i.e., content-based subdivision and

Stop relying on outdated and inaccurate databases and let Wiza be your source of truth for all deal sourcing and founder / CEO outreach.

Why we're different: The search fund market is dynamic and competitive - Wiza is not a static financial database that gets refreshed on occasion. Every datapoint is sourced and verified the moment that you receive the information. We verify deliverability of every single email ahead of providing the data, and we ensure that each person in your dataset has 100% job title and company accuracy by leveraging Linkedin Data sourced through their live Linkedin profile.

Key Features:

Comprehensive Data Coverage: Stop contacting the same people as everyone else. Wiza's search fund Data is sourced live, not stored in a limited database. When you tell us the type of company or person you would like to contact, we leverage Linkedin Data (the largest, most accurate database in the world) to find everyone who matches your ICP, and then we source the contact data and company data in real-time.

High-Quality, Accurate Data: Wiza ensures accuracy of all datapoints by taking a few key steps that other data providers fail to take: (1) Every email is SMTP verified ahead of delivery, ensuring they will not bounce (2) Every person's Linkedin profile is checked live to ensure we have 100% job title, company, location, etc. accuracy, ahead of providing any data (3) Phone numbers are constantly being verified with AI to ensure accuracy

Linkedin Data: Wiza is able to provide Linkedin Data points, sourced live from each person's Linkedin profile, including Subtitle, Bio, Job Title, Job Description, Skills, Languages, Certifications, Work History, Education, Open to Work, Premium Status, and more!

Personal Data: Wiza has access to industry leading volumes of B2C Contact Data, meaning you can find gmail/yahoo/hotmail email addresses, and mobile phone number data to contact your potential partners.

Nowadays web portals play an essential role in searching and retrieving information in the several fields of knowledge: they are ever more technologically advanced and designed for supporting the storage of a huge amount of information in natural language originating from the queries launched by users worldwide.A good example is given by the WorldWideScience search engine:The database is available at . It is based on a similar gateway, Science.gov, which is the major path to U.S. government science information, as it pulls together Web-based resources from various agencies. The information in the database is intended to be of high quality and authority, as well as the most current available from the participating countries in the Alliance, so users will find that the results will be more refined than those from a general search of Google. It covers the fields of medicine, agriculture, the environment, and energy, as well as basic sciences. Most of the information may be obtained free of charge (the database itself may be used free of charge) and is considered ‘‘open domain.’’ As of this writing, there are about 60 countries participating in WorldWideScience.org, providing access to 50+databases and information portals. Not all content is in English. (Bronson, 2009)Given this scenario, we focused on building a corpus constituted by the query logs registered by the GreyGuide: Repository and Portal to Good Practices and Resources in Grey Literature and received by the WorldWideScience.org (The Global Science Gateway) portal: the aim is to retrieve information related to social media which as of today represent a considerable source of data more and more widely used for research ends.This project includes eight months of query logs registered between July 2017 and February 2018 for a total of 445,827 queries. The analysis mainly concentrates on the semantics of the queries received from the portal clients: it is a process of information retrieval from a rich digital catalogue whose language is dynamic, is evolving and follows – as well as reflects – the cultural changes of our modern society.

Summary data of fixed broadband coverage by geographic area. License and Attribution: Broadband data from FCC Form 477, and data from the U.S. Census Bureau that are presented on this site are offered free and not subject to copyright restriction. Data and content created by government employees within the scope of their employment are not subject to domestic copyright protection under 17 U.S.C. § 105. See, e.g., U.S. Government Works. While not required, when using content, data, documentation, code and related materials from fcc.gov or broadbandmap.fcc.gov in your own work, we ask that proper credit be given. Examples include: • Source data: FCC Form 477 • Map layer based on FCC Form 477 • Code data based on broadbandmap.fcc.gov The geography look ups are created from the US census shapefiles, which are in Global Coordinate System North American Datum of 1983 (GCS NAD83). The coordinates do not get reprojected during processing. The "centroid_lng", "centroid_lat" columns in the lookup table are the exact values from the US census shapefile (INTPTLON, INTPTLAT). The "bbox_arr" column is calculated from the bounding box/extent of the original geometry in the shapefile; no reprojection or transformations are done to the geometry.

For any organism tracking a chemical cue to its source, the motion of its surrounding fluid provides crucial information for success. For both swimming and flying animals engaged in olfactory search, turning into the direction of oncoming wind or water current is often a critical first step. However, in nature, wind and water currents may not always provide a reliable directional cue , and it is unclear how organisms adjust their search strategies accordingly due to the challenges of separately controlling flow and chemical encounters. Here, we use the genetic toolkit of Drosophila melanogaster, a model organism for olfaction, to develop an optogenetic paradigm to deliver temporally precise “virtual” olfactory experiences in free-flying animals while independently manipulating the wind conditions. We show that in free flight, Drosophila melanogaster adopt distinct search routines that are gated by whether they are flying in laminar wind or in still air. We first confirm that in laminar wind flies turn upwind, and further, we show that they achieve this using a rapid turn. In still air, flies adopt remarkably stereotyped “sink and circle” search state characterized by ∼60° turns at 3-4 Hz, biased in a consistent direction. In both laminar wind and still air, immediately after odor onset, flies decelerate and often perform a rapid turn. Both maneuvers are consistent with predictions from recent control theoretic analyses for how insects may estimate properties of wind while in flight. We suggest that flies may use their deceleration and “anemometric” turn as active sensing maneuvers to rapidly gauge properties of their wind environment before initiating a proximal or upwind search routine. Methods For information on specific methodologies involved in data collections see the methods section found in: https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(24)00912-6

This dataset contains the valuation template the researcher can use to retrieve real-time Excel stock price and stock price in Google Sheets. The dataset is provided by Finsheet, the leading financial data provider for spreadsheet users. To get more financial data, visit the website and explore their function. For instance, if a researcher would like to get the last 30 years of income statement for Meta Platform Inc, the syntax would be =FS_EquityFullFinancials("FB", "ic", "FY", 30) In addition, this syntax will return the latest stock price for Caterpillar Inc right in your spreadsheet. =FS_Latest("CAT") If you need assistance with any of the function, feel free to reach out to their customer support team. To get starter, install their Excel and Google Sheets add-on.

This dataset provides comprehensive local business and point of interest (POI) data from Google Maps in real-time. It includes detailed business information such as addresses, websites, phone numbers, emails, ratings, reviews, business hours, and over 40 additional data points. Perfect for applications requiring local business data (b2b lead generation, b2b marketing), store locators, and business directories. The dataset is delivered in a JSON format via REST API.

Fire Stations in the United States Any location where fire fighters are stationed or based out of, or where equipment that such personnel use in carrying out their jobs is stored for ready use. Fire Departments not having a permanent location are included, in which case their location has been depicted at the city/town hall or at the center of their service area if a city/town hall does not exist. This dataset includes those locations primarily engaged in forest or grasslands fire fighting, including fire lookout towers if the towers are in current use for fire protection purposes. This dataset includes both private and governmental entities. Fire fighting training academies are also included. TGS has made a concerted effort to include all fire stations in the United States and its territories. This dataset is comprised completely of license free data. The HSIP Freedom Fire Station dataset and the HSIP Freedom EMS dataset were merged into one working file. TGS processed as one file and then separated for delivery purposes. Please see the process description for the breakdown of how the records were merged. Records with "-DOD" appended to the end of the [NAME] value are located on a military base, as defined by the Defense Installation Spatial Data Infrastructure (DISDI) military installations and military range boundaries. At the request of NGA, text fields in this dataset have been set to all upper case to facilitate consistent database engine search results. At the request of NGA, all diacritics (e.g., the German umlaut or the Spanish tilde) have been replaced with their closest equivalent English character to facilitate use with database systems that may not support diacritics. The currentness of this dataset is indicated by the [CONTDATE] field. Based upon this field, the oldest record dates from 01/03/2005 and the newest record dates from 01/11/2010.Homeland Security Use Cases: Use cases describe how the data may be used and help to define and clarify requirements. 1. An assessment of whether or not the total fire fighting capability in a given area is adequate. 2. A list of resources to draw upon by surrounding areas when local resources have temporarily been overwhelmed by a disaster - route analysis can determine those entities that are able to respond the quickest. 3. A resource for Emergency Management planning purposes. 4. A resource for catastrophe response to aid in the retrieval of equipment by outside responders in order to deal with the disaster. 5. A resource for situational awareness planning and response for Federal Government events.

Explore the historical Whois records related to free-stock-data.com (Domain). Get insights into ownership history and changes over time.

This dataset contains parametric data (epicentre, magnitude, depth, etc) for over one million earthquakes worldwide. The dataset has been compiled gradually over a period of thirty years from original third-party catalogues, and parameters have not been revised by BGS, although erroneous entries have been flagged where found. The dataset is kept in two versions: the complete "master" version, in which all entries for any single earthquake from contributing catalogue are preserved, and the "pruned" version, in which each earthquake is represented by a single entry, selected from the contributing sources according to a hierarchy of preferences. The pruned version, which is intended to be free from duplicate entries for the same event, provides a starting point for studies of seismicity and seismic hazard anywhere in the world.

The largest reported data leakage as of January 2024 was the Cam4 data breach in March 2020, which exposed more than 10 billion data records. The second-largest data breach in history so far, the Yahoo data breach, occurred in 2013. The company initially reported about one billion exposed data records, but after an investigation, the company updated the number, revealing that three billion accounts were affected. The National Public Data Breach was announced in August 2024. The incident became public when personally identifiable information of individuals became available for sale on the dark web. Overall, the security professionals estimate the leakage of nearly three billion personal records. The next significant data leakage was the March 2018 security breach of India's national ID database, Aadhaar, with over 1.1 billion records exposed. This included biometric information such as identification numbers and fingerprint scans, which could be used to open bank accounts and receive financial aid, among other government services.

Cybercrime - the dark side of digitalization As the world continues its journey into the digital age, corporations and governments across the globe have been increasing their reliance on technology to collect, analyze and store personal data. This, in turn, has led to a rise in the number of cyber crimes, ranging from minor breaches to global-scale attacks impacting billions of users – such as in the case of Yahoo. Within the U.S. alone, 1802 cases of data compromise were reported in 2022. This was a marked increase from the 447 cases reported a decade prior. The high price of data protection As of 2022, the average cost of a single data breach across all industries worldwide stood at around 4.35 million U.S. dollars. This was found to be most costly in the healthcare sector, with each leak reported to have cost the affected party a hefty 10.1 million U.S. dollars. The financial segment followed closely behind. Here, each breach resulted in a loss of approximately 6 million U.S. dollars - 1.5 million more than the global average.

Patent Search Software Market size was valued at USD 907.61 Million in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 2,282.62 Million by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 12.32% from 2024 to 2031.

Global Patent Search Software Market Overview

The Patent Search Software Market is experiencing significant growth, fueled by the ever-increasing volume of patent filings globally. Companies are constantly innovating, and effective patent search has become critical for navigating the complex intellectual property landscape. This software empowers businesses to make informed decisions regarding research and development (R&D), competitive analysis, freedom-to-operate assessments, and patent portfolio management. The market is driven by several key factors. Firstly, the rising number of patent applications worldwide necessitates robust search tools. Patent offices are witnessing a surge in filings, particularly in technology-driven sectors like healthcare and artificial intelligence.

This vast amount of data makes manual searching impractical, and patent search software offers a time-saving and efficient solution. Secondly, the growing emphasis on intellectual property (IP) protection is propelling market growth. Companies recognize the value of their inventions and are increasingly seeking patents to safeguard their competitive edge. Patent search software empowers them to identify potential conflicts with existing patents, ensuring they avoid infringement risks and optimize their patenting strategies. Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are adding new dimensions to patent search capabilities. These technologies enable software to analyze vast datasets of patent information with greater accuracy and efficiency.

They can identify relevant patents based on keywords, classifications, and even semantic relationships, leading to more comprehensive and insightful searches. This trend is expected to further accelerate market growth as businesses seek advanced tools to gain a deeper understanding of the competitive landscape. The Patent Search Software Market is poised for continued expansion. The increasing adoption of cloud-based solutions, offering scalability and accessibility, is another factor contributing to market growth. Additionally, the growing focus on international patent filing necessitates software that can navigate the complexities of multiple patent offices and legal jurisdictions. As companies strive for global market reach, the demand for robust and versatile patent search tools is expected to remain high.

Additional data for WRR paper free surface search simulation using adaptive moving-mesh algorithm by Bin Zhang et al 2018