Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Publicly accessible databases often impose query limits or require registration. Even when I maintain public and limit-free APIs, I never wanted to host a public database because I tend to think that the connection strings are a problem for the user.
I’ve decided to host different light/medium size by using PostgreSQL, MySQL and SQL Server backends (in strict descending order of preference!).
Why 3 database backends? I think there are a ton of small edge cases when moving between DB back ends and so testing lots with live databases is quite valuable. With this resource you can benchmark speed, compression, and DDL types.
Please send me a tweet if you need the connection strings for your lectures or workshops. My Twitter username is @pachamaltese. See the SQL dumps on each section to have the data locally.
As of June 2024, the most popular database management system (DBMS) worldwide was Oracle, with a ranking score of *******; MySQL and Microsoft SQL server rounded out the top three. Although the database management industry contains some of the largest companies in the tech industry, such as Microsoft, Oracle and IBM, a number of free and open-source DBMSs such as PostgreSQL and MariaDB remain competitive. Database Management Systems As the name implies, DBMSs provide a platform through which developers can organize, update, and control large databases. Given the business world’s growing focus on big data and data analytics, knowledge of SQL programming languages has become an important asset for software developers around the world, and database management skills are seen as highly desirable. In addition to providing developers with the tools needed to operate databases, DBMS are also integral to the way that consumers access information through applications, which further illustrates the importance of the software.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Publicly accessible databases often impose query limits or require registration. Even when I maintain public and limit-free APIs, I never wanted to host a public database because I tend to think that the connection strings are a problem for the user.
https://www.promarketreports.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.promarketreports.com/privacy-policy
The size of the Relational Database Market was valued at USD 19942.01 million in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 45481.69 million by 2032, with an expected CAGR of 12.50% during the forecast period. This growth trajectory is primarily driven by the advent of hybrid seeds, which offer superior yield and improved disease resistance. Government initiatives aimed at promoting food security and the adoption of advanced technologies further fuel market expansion. Key applications for hybrid seeds encompass field crops, horticulture, and fodder crops. Leading players in the market include Monsanto, DuPont Pioneer, Syngenta, and Bayer CropScience. Recent developments include: October 2022: Oracle released latest advancements in database technology with the announcement of Oracle Database 23c Beta. It accommodates diverse data types, workloads, and development styles. The release incorporates numerous innovations across Oracle's database services and product portfolio., October 2023: Microsoft has launched a public preview of a new Azure SQL Database free offering, marking a significant addition to its cloud services. Users can access a 32 GB general purpose, serverless Azure SQL database with 100,000 vCore seconds of compute free monthly..
https://www.zionmarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.zionmarketresearch.com/privacy-policy
Global In-memory database market is expected to revenue of around USD 36.21 billion by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 19.2% between 2024 and 2032.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The O*NET Database contains hundreds of standardized and occupation-specific descriptors on almost 1,000 occupations covering the entire U.S. economy. The database, which is available to the public at no cost, is continually updated by a multi-method data collection program. Sources of data include: job incumbents, occupational experts, occupational analysts, employer job postings, and customer/professional association input.
Data content areas include:
analyze the health and retirement study (hrs) with r the hrs is the one and only longitudinal survey of american seniors. with a panel starting its third decade, the current pool of respondents includes older folks who have been interviewed every two years as far back as 1992. unlike cross-sectional or shorter panel surveys, respondents keep responding until, well, death d o us part. paid for by the national institute on aging and administered by the university of michigan's institute for social research, if you apply for an interviewer job with them, i hope you like werther's original. figuring out how to analyze this data set might trigger your fight-or-flight synapses if you just start clicking arou nd on michigan's website. instead, read pages numbered 10-17 (pdf pages 12-19) of this introduction pdf and don't touch the data until you understand figure a-3 on that last page. if you start enjoying yourself, here's the whole book. after that, it's time to register for access to the (free) data. keep your username and password handy, you'll need it for the top of the download automation r script. next, look at this data flowchart to get an idea of why the data download page is such a righteous jungle. but wait, good news: umich recently farmed out its data management to the rand corporation, who promptly constructed a giant consolidated file with one record per respondent across the whole panel. oh so beautiful. the rand hrs files make much of the older data and syntax examples obsolete, so when you come across stuff like instructions on how to merge years, you can happily ignore them - rand has done it for you. the health and retirement study only includes noninstitutionalized adults when new respondents get added to the panel (as they were in 1992, 1993, 1998, 2004, and 2010) but once they're in, they're in - respondents have a weight of zero for interview waves when they were nursing home residents; but they're still responding and will continue to contribute to your statistics so long as you're generalizing about a population from a previous wave (for example: it's possible to compute "among all americans who were 50+ years old in 1998, x% lived in nursing homes by 2010"). my source for that 411? page 13 of the design doc. wicked. this new github repository contains five scripts: 1992 - 2010 download HRS microdata.R loop through every year and every file, download, then unzip everything in one big party impor t longitudinal RAND contributed files.R create a SQLite database (.db) on the local disk load the rand, rand-cams, and both rand-family files into the database (.db) in chunks (to prevent overloading ram) longitudinal RAND - analysis examples.R connect to the sql database created by the 'import longitudinal RAND contributed files' program create tw o database-backed complex sample survey object, using a taylor-series linearization design perform a mountain of analysis examples with wave weights from two different points in the panel import example HRS file.R load a fixed-width file using only the sas importation script directly into ram with < a href="http://blog.revolutionanalytics.com/2012/07/importing-public-data-with-sas-instructions-into-r.html">SAScii parse through the IF block at the bottom of the sas importation script, blank out a number of variables save the file as an R data file (.rda) for fast loading later replicate 2002 regression.R connect to the sql database created by the 'import longitudinal RAND contributed files' program create a database-backed complex sample survey object, using a taylor-series linearization design exactly match the final regression shown in this document provided by analysts at RAND as an update of the regression on pdf page B76 of this document . click here to view these five scripts for more detail about the health and retirement study (hrs), visit: michigan's hrs homepage rand's hrs homepage the hrs wikipedia page a running list of publications using hrs notes: exemplary work making it this far. as a reward, here's the detailed codebook for the main rand hrs file. note that rand also creates 'flat files' for every survey wave, but really, most every analysis you c an think of is possible using just the four files imported with the rand importation script above. if you must work with the non-rand files, there's an example of how to import a single hrs (umich-created) file, but if you wish to import more than one, you'll have to write some for loops yourself. confidential to sas, spss, stata, and sudaan users: a tidal wave is coming. you can get water up your nose and be dragged out to sea, or you can grab a surf board. time to transition to r. :D
The State Contract and Procurement Registration System (SCPRS) was established in 2003, as a centralized database of information on State contracts and purchases over $5000. eSCPRS represents the data captured in the State's eProcurement (eP) system, Bidsync, as of March 16, 2009. The data provided is an extract from that system for fiscal years 2012-2013, 2013-2014, and 2014-2015
Data Limitations:
Some purchase orders have multiple UNSPSC numbers, however only first was used to identify the purchase order. Multiple UNSPSC numbers were included to provide additional data for a DGS special event however this affects the formatting of the file. The source system Bidsync is being deprecated and these issues will be resolved in the future as state systems transition to Fi$cal.
Data Collection Methodology:
The data collection process starts with a data file from eSCPRS that is scrubbed and standardized prior to being uploaded into a SQL Server database. There are four primary tables. The Supplier, Department and United Nations Standard Products and Services Code (UNSPSC) tables are reference tables. The Supplier and Department tables are updated and mapped to the appropriate numbering schema and naming conventions. The UNSPSC table is used to categorize line item information and requires no further manipulation. The Purchase Order table contains raw data that requires conversion to the correct data format and mapping to the corresponding data fields. A stacking method is applied to the table to eliminate blanks where needed. Extraneous characters are removed from fields. The four tables are joined together and queries are executed to update the final Purchase Order Dataset table. Once the scrubbing and standardization process is complete the data is then uploaded into the SQL Server database.
Secondary/Related Resources:
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Open Context (https://opencontext.org) publishes free and open access research data for archaeology and related disciplines. An open source (but bespoke) Django (Python) application supports these data publishing services. The software repository is here: https://github.com/ekansa/open-context-py (the "production" branch is the one used for Open Context's primary public deployment).
We also provide a Docker based approach for installing Open Context via this code repository: https://github.com/opencontext/oc-docker (the "production" branch installs the branch of code used for Open Context's primary public deployment).
The Open Context team runs ETL (extract, transform, load) workflows to import data contributed by researchers from various source relational databases and spreadsheets. Open Context uses PostgreSQL (https://www.postgresql.org) relational database to manage these imported data in a graph style schema. The Open Context Python application interacts with the PostgreSQL database via the Django Object-Relational-Model (ORM).
This database dump includes all published structured data organized used by Open Context (table names that start with 'oc_all_'). The binary media files referenced by these structured data records are stored elsewhere. Binary media files for some projects, still in preparation, are not yet archived with long term digital repositories.
These data comprehensively reflect the structured data currently published and publicly available on Open Context. Other data (such as user and group information) used to run the Website are not included. The data are provided in a plain text SQL dump (for restoration into a version 14+ PostgreSQL database) and in the non-proprietary (but binary) parquet file format.
IMPORTANT
This database dump contains data from roughly 190+ different projects. Each project dataset has its own metadata and citation expectations. If you use these data, you must cite each data contributor appropriately, not just this Zenodo archived database dump.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The ATO (Australian Tax Office) made a dataset openly available (see links) showing all the Australian Salary and Wages (2002, 2006, 2010, 2014) by detailed occupation (around 1,000) and over 100 SA4 regions. Sole Trader sales and earnings are also provided. This open data (csv) is now packaged into a database (*.sql) with 45 sample SQL queries (backupSQL[date]_public.txt).See more description at related Figshare #datavis record. Versions:V5: Following #datascience course, I have made main data (individual salary and wages) available as csv and Jupyter Notebook. Checksum matches #dataTotals. In 209,xxx rows.Also provided Jobs, and SA4(Locations) description files as csv. More details at: Where are jobs growing/shrinking? Figshare DOI: 4056282 (linked below). Noted 1% discrepancy ($6B) in 2010 wages total - to follow up.#dataTotals - Salary and WagesYearWorkers (M)Earnings ($B) 20028.528520069.4372201010.2481201410.3584#dataTotal - Sole TradersYearWorkers (M)Sales ($B)Earnings ($B)20020.9611320061.0881920101.11122620141.19630#links See ATO request for data at ideascale link below.See original csv open data set (CC-BY) at data.gov.au link below.This database was used to create maps of change in regional employment - see Figshare link below (m9.figshare.4056282).#packageThis file package contains a database (analysing the open data) in SQL package and sample SQL text, interrogating the DB. DB name: test. There are 20 queries relating to Salary and Wages.#analysisThe database was analysed and outputs provided on Nectar(.org.au) resources at: http://118.138.240.130.(offline)This is only resourced for max 1 year, from July 2016, so will expire in June 2017. Hence the filing here. The sample home page is provided here (and pdf), but not all the supporting files, which may be packaged and added later. Until then all files are available at the Nectar URL. Nectar URL now offline - server files attached as package (html_backup[date].zip), including php scripts, html, csv, jpegs.#installIMPORT: DB SQL dump e.g. test_2016-12-20.sql (14.8Mb)1.Started MAMP on OSX.1.1 Go to PhpMyAdmin2. New Database: 3. Import: Choose file: test_2016-12-20.sql -> Go (about 15-20 seconds on MacBookPro 16Gb, 2.3 Ghz i5)4. four tables appeared: jobTitles 3,208 rows | salaryWages 209,697 rows | soleTrader 97,209 rows | stateNames 9 rowsplus views e.g. deltahair, Industrycodes, states5. Run test query under **#; Sum of Salary by SA4 e.g. 101 $4.7B, 102 $6.9B#sampleSQLselect sa4,(select sum(count) from salaryWageswhere year = '2014' and sa4 = sw.sa4) as thisYr14,(select sum(count) from salaryWageswhere year = '2010' and sa4 = sw.sa4) as thisYr10,(select sum(count) from salaryWageswhere year = '2006' and sa4 = sw.sa4) as thisYr06,(select sum(count) from salaryWageswhere year = '2002' and sa4 = sw.sa4) as thisYr02from salaryWages swgroup by sa4order by sa4
Not seeing a result you expected?
Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Publicly accessible databases often impose query limits or require registration. Even when I maintain public and limit-free APIs, I never wanted to host a public database because I tend to think that the connection strings are a problem for the user.
I’ve decided to host different light/medium size by using PostgreSQL, MySQL and SQL Server backends (in strict descending order of preference!).
Why 3 database backends? I think there are a ton of small edge cases when moving between DB back ends and so testing lots with live databases is quite valuable. With this resource you can benchmark speed, compression, and DDL types.
Please send me a tweet if you need the connection strings for your lectures or workshops. My Twitter username is @pachamaltese. See the SQL dumps on each section to have the data locally.