86 datasets found
  1. 2025-02-21 Gallup World Poll

    • redivis.com
    Updated Dec 14, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Stanford University Libraries (2024). 2025-02-21 Gallup World Poll [Dataset]. https://redivis.com/datasets/zqck-d60drwz0p
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 14, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Stanford University
    Authors
    Stanford University Libraries
    Time period covered
    Jun 1, 2005 - Jan 1, 2025
    Area covered
    World
    Description

    The table 2025-02-21 Gallup World Poll is part of the dataset Gallup World Poll, available at https://redivis.com/datasets/zqck-d60drwz0p. It contains 2884961 rows across 2751 variables.

  2. Gallup Analytics

    • archive.ciser.cornell.edu
    Updated Feb 15, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Gallup Organization (2024). Gallup Analytics [Dataset]. https://archive.ciser.cornell.edu/studies/2823
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 15, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Gallup, Inc.http://gallup.com/
    Authors
    Gallup Organization
    Variables measured
    Individual
    Description

    Contains Gallup data from countries that are home to more than 98% of the world's population through a state-of-the-art Web-based portal. Gallup Analytics puts Gallup's best global intelligence in users' hands to help them better understand the strengths and challenges of the world's countries and regions. Users can access Gallup's U.S. Daily tracking and World Poll data to compare residents' responses region by region and nation by nation to questions on topics such as economic conditions, government and business, health and wellbeing, infrastructure, and education.

    The Gallup Analytics Database is accessed through the Cornell University Libraries here. In addition, a CUL subscription also allows access to the Gallup Respondent Level Data. For access please refer to the documentation below and then request the variables you need here.

    Before requesting data from the World Poll, please see the Getting Started guide and the Worldwide Research Methodology and Codebook (You will need to request access). The Codebook will give you information about all available variables in the datasets. There are other guides available as well in the google folder. You can also access information about questions asked and variables using the Gallup World Poll Reference Tool. You will need to create your user account to access the tool. This will only give you access to information about the questions asked and variables. It will not give you access to the data.

    For further documentation and information see this site from New York University Libraries. The Gallup documentation for the World Poll methodology is also available under the Data and Documentation tab.

    In addition to the World Poll and Daily Tracking Poll, also available are the Gallup Covid-19 Survey, Gallup Poll Social Series Surveys, Race Relations Survey, Confidence in Institutions Survey, Honesty and Ethics in Professions Survey, and Religion Battery.

    The process for getting access to respondent-level data from the Gallup U.S. Daily Tracking is similar to the World Poll Survey. There is no comparable discovery tool for U.S. Daily Tracking poll questions, however. Users need to consult the codebooks and available variables across years.

    The COVID-19 web survey began on March 13, 2020 with daily random samples of U.S. adults, aged 18 and older who are members of the Gallup Panel. Before requesting data, please see the Gallup Panel COVID-19 Survey Methodology and Codebook.

    The Gallup Poll Social Series (GPSS) dataset is a set of public opinion surveys designed to monitor U.S. adults’ views on numerous social, economic, and political topics. More information is available on the Gallup website: https://www.gallup.com/175307/gallup-poll-social-series-methodology.aspx As each month has a unique codebook, contact CCSS-ResearchSupport@cornell.edu to discuss your interests and start the data request process.

    Starting in 1973, Gallup started measuring the confidence level in several US institutions like Congress, Presidency, Supreme Court, Police, etc. The included dataset includes data beginning in 1973 and data is collected once per year. Users should consult the list of available variables.

    The Race Relations Poll includes topics that were previously represented in the GPSS Minority Relations Survey that ran through 2016. The Race Relations Survey was conducted November 2018. Users should consult the codebook for this poll before making their request.

    The Honesty and Ethics in Professions Survey – Starting in 1976, Gallup started measuring US perceptions of the honesty and ethics of a list of professions. The included dataset was added to the collection in March 2023 and includes data ranging from 1976-2022. Documentation for this collection is located here and will require you to request access.

    Religion Battery: Consolidated list of items focused on religion in the US from 1999-2022. Documentation for this collection is located here and will require you to request access.

  3. Gallup Respondent-Level Data: World Poll

    • datacatalog.med.nyu.edu
    Updated Mar 22, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Gallup (2024). Gallup Respondent-Level Data: World Poll [Dataset]. https://datacatalog.med.nyu.edu/dataset/10183
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 22, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Gallup, Inc.http://gallup.com/
    Authors
    Gallup
    Area covered
    International
    Description

    The Gallup World Poll is an ongoing global survey that collects respondents' opinions on a variety of topics. In geographic regions that have low access to telephone services, survey staff go to that area and to ask residents questions in-person. The Gallup World Poll includes core questions on business and economics, citizen engagement, communications and technology, education and families, environment and energy, food and shelter, government and politics, health, law and order, religion and ethics, social issues, well-being, and work. Additional questions may be included or edited depending on geographic location.

  4. Gallup World Poll 2013, June - Afghanistan, Angola, Albania...and 183 more

    • datacatalog.ihsn.org
    • catalog.ihsn.org
    Updated Jun 14, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Gallup, Inc. (2022). Gallup World Poll 2013, June - Afghanistan, Angola, Albania...and 183 more [Dataset]. https://datacatalog.ihsn.org/catalog/8494
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 14, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Gallup, Inc.http://gallup.com/
    Time period covered
    2005 - 2012
    Area covered
    Albania, Angola, Afghanistan
    Description

    Abstract

    Gallup Worldwide Research continually surveys residents in more than 150 countries, representing more than 98% of the world's adult population, using randomly selected, nationally representative samples. Gallup typically surveys 1,000 individuals in each country, using a standard set of core questions that has been translated into the major languages of the respective country. In some regions, supplemental questions are asked in addition to core questions. Face-to-face interviews are approximately 1 hour, while telephone interviews are about 30 minutes. In many countries, the survey is conducted once per year, and fieldwork is generally completed in two to four weeks. The Country Dataset Details spreadsheet displays each country's sample size, month/year of the data collection, mode of interviewing, languages employed, design effect, margin of error, and details about sample coverage.

    Gallup is entirely responsible for the management, design, and control of Gallup Worldwide Research. For the past 70 years, Gallup has been committed to the principle that accurately collecting and disseminating the opinions and aspirations of people around the globe is vital to understanding our world. Gallup's mission is to provide information in an objective, reliable, and scientifically grounded manner. Gallup is not associated with any political orientation, party, or advocacy group and does not accept partisan entities as clients. Any individual, institution, or governmental agency may access the Gallup Worldwide Research regardless of nationality. The identities of clients and all surveyed respondents will remain confidential.

    Kind of data

    Sample survey data [ssd]

    Sampling procedure

    SAMPLING AND DATA COLLECTION METHODOLOGY With some exceptions, all samples are probability based and nationally representative of the resident population aged 15 and older. The coverage area is the entire country including rural areas, and the sampling frame represents the entire civilian, non-institutionalized, aged 15 and older population of the entire country. Exceptions include areas where the safety of interviewing staff is threatened, scarcely populated islands in some countries, and areas that interviewers can reach only by foot, animal, or small boat.

    Telephone surveys are used in countries where telephone coverage represents at least 80% of the population or is the customary survey methodology (see the Country Dataset Details for detailed information for each country). In Central and Eastern Europe, as well as in the developing world, including much of Latin America, the former Soviet Union countries, nearly all of Asia, the Middle East, and Africa, an area frame design is used for face-to-face interviewing.

    The typical Gallup Worldwide Research survey includes at least 1,000 surveys of individuals. In some countries, oversamples are collected in major cities or areas of special interest. Additionally, in some large countries, such as China and Russia, sample sizes of at least 2,000 are collected. Although rare, in some instances the sample size is between 500 and 1,000. See the Country Dataset Details for detailed information for each country.

    FACE-TO-FACE SURVEY DESIGN

    FIRST STAGE In countries where face-to-face surveys are conducted, the first stage of sampling is the identification of 100 to 135 ultimate clusters (Sampling Units), consisting of clusters of households. Sampling units are stratified by population size and or geography and clustering is achieved through one or more stages of sampling. Where population information is available, sample selection is based on probabilities proportional to population size, otherwise simple random sampling is used. Samples are drawn independent of any samples drawn for surveys conducted in previous years.

    There are two methods for sample stratification:

    METHOD 1: The sample is stratified into 100 to 125 ultimate clusters drawn proportional to the national population, using the following strata: 1) Areas with population of at least 1 million 2) Areas 500,000-999,999 3) Areas 100,000-499,999 4) Areas 50,000-99,999 5) Areas 10,000-49,999 6) Areas with less than 10,000

    The strata could include additional stratum to reflect populations that exceed 1 million as well as areas with populations less than 10,000. Worldwide Research Methodology and Codebook Copyright © 2008-2012 Gallup, Inc. All rights reserved. 8

    METHOD 2:

    A multi-stage design is used. The country is first stratified by large geographic units, and then by smaller units within geography. A minimum of 33 Primary Sampling Units (PSUs), which are first stage sampling units, are selected. The sample design results in 100 to 125 ultimate clusters.

    SECOND STAGE

    Random route procedures are used to select sampled households. Unless an outright refusal occurs, interviewers make up to three attempts to survey the sampled household. To increase the probability of contact and completion, attempts are made at different times of the day, and where possible, on different days. If an interviewer cannot obtain an interview at the initial sampled household, he or she uses a simple substitution method. Refer to Appendix C for a more in-depth description of random route procedures.

    THIRD STAGE

    Respondents are randomly selected within the selected households. Interviewers list all eligible household members and their ages or birthdays. The respondent is selected by means of the Kish grid (refer to Appendix C) in countries where face-to-face interviewing is used. The interview does not inform the person who answers the door of the selection criteria until after the respondent has been identified. In a few Middle East and Asian countries where cultural restrictions dictate gender matching, respondents are randomly selected using the Kish grid from among all eligible adults of the matching gender.

    TELEPHONE SURVEY DESIGN

    In countries where telephone interviewing is employed, random-digit-dial (RDD) or a nationally representative list of phone numbers is used. In select countries where cell phone penetration is high, a dual sampling frame is used. Random respondent selection is achieved by using either the latest birthday or Kish grid method. At least three attempts are made to reach a person in each household, spread over different days and times of day. Appointments for callbacks that fall within the survey data collection period are made.

    PANEL SURVEY DESIGN

    Prior to 2009, United States data were collected using The Gallup Panel. The Gallup Panel is a probability-based, nationally representative panel, for which all members are recruited via random-digit-dial methodology and is only used in the United States. Participants who elect to join the panel are committing to the completion of two to three surveys per month, with the typical survey lasting 10 to 15 minutes. The Gallup Worldwide Research panel survey is conducted over the telephone and takes approximately 30 minutes. No incentives are given to panel participants. Worldwide Research Methodology and Codebook Copyright © 2008-2012 Gallup, Inc. All rights reserved. 9

    Research instrument

    QUESTION DESIGN

    Many of the Worldwide Research questions are items that Gallup has used for years. When developing additional questions, Gallup employed its worldwide network of research and political scientists1 to better understand key issues with regard to question development and construction and data gathering. Hundreds of items were developed, tested, piloted, and finalized. The best questions were retained for the core questionnaire and organized into indexes. Most items have a simple dichotomous ("yes or no") response set to minimize contamination of data because of cultural differences in response styles and to facilitate cross-cultural comparisons.

    The Gallup Worldwide Research measures key indicators such as Law and Order, Food and Shelter, Job Creation, Migration, Financial Wellbeing, Personal Health, Civic Engagement, and Evaluative Wellbeing and demonstrates their correlations with world development indicators such as GDP and Brain Gain. These indicators assist leaders in understanding the broad context of national interests and establishing organization-specific correlations between leading indexes and lagging economic outcomes.

    Gallup organizes its core group of indicators into the Gallup World Path. The Path is an organizational conceptualization of the seven indexes and is not to be construed as a causal model. The individual indexes have many properties of a strong theoretical framework. A more in-depth description of the questions and Gallup indexes is included in the indexes section of this document. In addition to World Path indexes, Gallup Worldwide Research questions also measure opinions about national institutions, corruption, youth development, community basics, diversity, optimism, communications, religiosity, and numerous other topics. For many regions of the world, additional questions that are specific to that region or country are included in surveys. Region-specific questions have been developed for predominantly Muslim nations, former Soviet Union countries, the Balkans, sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America, China and India, South Asia, and Israel and the Palestinian Territories.

    The questionnaire is translated into the major conversational languages of each country. The translation process starts with an English, French, or Spanish version, depending on the region. One of two translation methods may be used.

    METHOD 1: Two independent translations are completed. An independent third party, with some knowledge of survey research methods, adjudicates the differences. A professional translator translates the final version back into the source language.

    METHOD 2: A translator

  5. A

    Australian Gallup Poll, Survey 18, July 31, 1943

    • dataverse.ada.edu.au
    pdf, zip
    Updated May 20, 2019
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    ADA Dataverse (2019). Australian Gallup Poll, Survey 18, July 31, 1943 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.26193/OOEAQU
    Explore at:
    pdf(231952), pdf(202807), zip(28354), zip(33472), pdf(8681), zip(31298), pdf(151541), zip(20929)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 20, 2019
    Dataset provided by
    ADA Dataverse
    License

    https://dataverse.ada.edu.au/api/datasets/:persistentId/versions/2.0/customlicense?persistentId=doi:10.26193/OOEAQUhttps://dataverse.ada.edu.au/api/datasets/:persistentId/versions/2.0/customlicense?persistentId=doi:10.26193/OOEAQU

    Time period covered
    Jul 1, 1943
    Area covered
    Tasmania, Victoria, Queensland, Australia, Australia, Australia
    Description

    The Australian Gallup Polls, commissioned by Australian Public Opinion Polls (The Gallup Method) cover the periods of 1943-1968 and 1975-1987. Australian Gallup Polls comprise two subseries: the earlier series conducted by Roy Morgan (1943-1968); and the later series by McNair Anderson Associates (1975-1983). Opinion polls in the earlier series were conducted on a regular basis by Roy Morgan and the current holding of this archive date from July 1943 to August 1968, a total of 89 polls. The data are also available from the Roper Centre, University of Connecticut, U.S.A, where they were originally deposited. Topics covered in this survey, Australian Gallup Poll Survey 18 July 31,1943, are alcohol prohibition, Curtin, J., defence: army, all-party government, compulsory savings and investment, schools leaving age, and membership of trade unions. Background Variables: age, sex, economic classification, occupation of head of household, vote at last Federal election, present voting intention, car ownership and phone subscription.

  6. Food Insecurity Experience Scale 2021 - Jamaica

    • microdata.worldbank.org
    • catalog.ihsn.org
    Updated Jan 18, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    FAO Statistics Division (2023). Food Insecurity Experience Scale 2021 - Jamaica [Dataset]. https://microdata.worldbank.org/index.php/catalog/5501
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 18, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Food and Agriculture Organizationhttp://fao.org/
    Authors
    FAO Statistics Division
    Time period covered
    2021
    Area covered
    Jamaica
    Description

    Abstract

    Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) target 2.1 commits countries to end hunger, ensure access by all people to safe, nutritious and sufficient food all year around. Indicator 2.1.2, “Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity based on the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES)”, provides internationally-comparable estimates of the proportion of the population facing difficulties in accessing food. More detailed background information is available at http://www.fao.org/in-action/voices-of-the-hungry/fies/en/ .

    The FIES-based indicators are compiled using the FIES survey module, containing 8 questions. Two indicators can be computed:
    1. The proportion of the population experiencing moderate or severe food insecurity (SDG indicator 2.1.2), 2. The proportion of the population experiencing severe food insecurity.

    These data were collected by FAO through the Gallup World Poll. General information on the methodology can be found here: https://www.gallup.com/178667/gallup-world-poll-work.aspx. National institutions can also collect FIES data by including the FIES survey module in nationally representative surveys.

    Microdata can be used to calculate the indicator 2.1.2 at national level. Instructions for computing this indicator are described in the methodological document available in the documentations tab. Disaggregating results at sub-national level is not encouraged because estimates will suffer from substantial sampling and measurement error.

    Geographic coverage

    National coverage

    Analysis unit

    Individuals

    Universe

    Individuals of 15 years or older with access to landline and/or mobile phones.

    Kind of data

    Sample survey data [ssd]

    Sampling procedure

    A stratified multi-stage cluster sample design was used to complete 505 face-to-face surveys. Exclusions: NA Design effect: 1.6

    Mode of data collection

    Computer Assisted Personal Interview [capi]

    Cleaning operations

    Statistical validation assesses the quality of the FIES data collected by testing their consistency with the assumptions of the Rasch model. This analysis involves the interpretation of several statistics that reveal 1) items that do not perform well in a given context, 2) cases with highly erratic response patterns, 3) pairs of items that may be redundant, and 4) the proportion of total variance in the population that is accounted for by the measurement model.

    Sampling error estimates

    The margin of error is estimated as 5.5. This is calculated around a proportion at the 95% confidence level. The maximum margin of error was calculated assuming a reported percentage of 50% and takes into account the design effect.

    Data appraisal

    The variable WORRIED was not considered in the computation of the published FAO food insecurity indicator based on FIES due to the results of the validation process. The variable HEALTHY was not considered in the computation of the published FAO food insecurity indicator based on FIES due to the results of the validation process.

  7. Gallup Analytics

    • data.library.wustl.edu
    Updated 2006
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Gallup Organization (2006). Gallup Analytics [Dataset]. https://data.library.wustl.edu/record/108216
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    2006
    Dataset provided by
    Gallup, Inc.http://gallup.com/
    Authors
    Gallup Organization
    Description

    Gallup has developed Gallup Analytics, which allows Users to access data from the Gallup World Poll, the Gallup U.S. Daily tracking and the historical data from the Gallup Poll Social Series. Gallup Analytics includes questions and indexes covering topics such as economics, politics and well-being.

  8. d

    Replication Data for: The popularity of authoritarian leaders: A...

    • search.dataone.org
    • dataverse.harvard.edu
    Updated Nov 22, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    GURIEV, SERGEI; TREISMAN, DANIEL (2023). Replication Data for: The popularity of authoritarian leaders: A cross-national investigation [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/8NGKDS
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 22, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Harvard Dataverse
    Authors
    GURIEV, SERGEI; TREISMAN, DANIEL
    Description

    How do citizens in authoritarian states feel about their leaders? While some dictators rule through terror, others seem genuinely popular. Using the Gallup World Poll’s panel of more than 140 countries in 2006-16, we show that the drivers of political approval differ across types of regime. Although brutal repression in “overt dictatorships” could cause respondents to falsify their preferences, in milder “informational autocracies” greater repression actually predicts lower approval. In autocracies as in democracies, economic performance matters, and citizens’ economic perceptions, while not perfectly accurate, track objective indicators. Dictators also benefit from greater perceived public safety, although we find no such effect in democracies. Covert censorship of the media and Internet are associated with higher approval, but ratings fall when citizens recognize censorship. In informational autocracies, executive elections trigger a ratings surge if the leader changes, but—unlike in democracies—reelected autocrats enjoy little honeymoon.

  9. What Is the World's Emotional Temperature?

    • news.gallup.com
    Updated Mar 24, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Gallup (2025). What Is the World's Emotional Temperature? [Dataset]. https://news.gallup.com/interactives/248240/global-emotions.aspx
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 24, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Gallup, Inc.http://gallup.com/
    Area covered
    World
    Description

    Gallup asked people in more than 140 countries how they were feeling. Find out what they said and how you compare.

  10. Food Insecurity Experience Scale 2023 - Austria

    • microdata.worldbank.org
    • catalog.ihsn.org
    Updated Oct 16, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    FAO Statistics Division (2024). Food Insecurity Experience Scale 2023 - Austria [Dataset]. https://microdata.worldbank.org/index.php/catalog/6294
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 16, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Food and Agriculture Organizationhttp://fao.org/
    Authors
    FAO Statistics Division
    Time period covered
    2023
    Area covered
    Austria
    Description

    Abstract

    Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) target 2.1 commits countries to end hunger, ensure access by all people to safe, nutritious and sufficient food all year around. Indicator 2.1.2, “Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity based on the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES)”, provides internationally-comparable estimates of the proportion of the population facing difficulties in accessing food. More detailed background information is available at http://www.fao.org/in-action/voices-of-the-hungry/fies/en/

    The FIES-based indicators are compiled using the FIES survey module, containing 8 questions. Two indicators can be computed:
    1. The proportion of the population experiencing moderate or severe food insecurity (SDG indicator 2.1.2), 2. The proportion of the population experiencing severe food insecurity.

    These data were collected by FAO through the Gallup World Poll. General information on the methodology can be found here: https://www.gallup.com/178667/gallup-world-poll-work.aspx. National institutions can also collect FIES data by including the FIES survey module in nationally representative surveys.

    Microdata can be used to calculate the indicator 2.1.2 at national level. Instructions for computing this indicator are described in the methodological document available in the downloads tab. Disaggregating results at sub-national level is not encouraged because estimates will suffer from substantial sampling and measurement error.

    Geographic coverage

    National

    Analysis unit

    Individuals

    Universe

    Individuals of 15 years or older with access to landline and/or mobile phones.

    Kind of data

    Sample survey data [ssd]

    Sampling procedure

    With some exceptions, all samples are probability based and nationally representative of the resident adult population. The coverage area is the entire country including rural areas, and the sampling frame represents the entire civilian, non-institutionalized, aged 15 and older population. For more details on the overall sampling and data collection methodology, see the World poll methodology attached as a resource in the downloads tab. Specific sampling details for each country are also attached as technical documents in the downloads tab. Exclusions: NA Design effect: 1.84

    Mode of data collection

    Computer-Assisted Telephone Interviewing [CATI]

    Cleaning operations

    Statistical validation assesses the quality of the FIES data collected by testing their consistency with the assumptions of the Rasch model. This analysis involves the interpretation of several statistics that reveal 1) items that do not perform well in a given context, 2) cases with highly erratic response patterns, 3) pairs of items that may be redundant, and 4) the proportion of total variance in the population that is accounted for by the measurement model.

    Sampling error estimates

    The margin of error is estimated as 4.2. This is calculated around a proportion at the 95% confidence level. The maximum margin of error was calculated assuming a reported percentage of 50% and takes into account the design effect.

  11. Data from: Voice of the People Millennium Survey, 2000

    • icpsr.umich.edu
    • abacus.library.ubc.ca
    ascii, delimited, sas +2
    Updated Aug 18, 2009
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Gallup International, Inc. (2009). Voice of the People Millennium Survey, 2000 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24661.v1
    Explore at:
    ascii, delimited, sas, spss, stataAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 18, 2009
    Dataset provided by
    Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Researchhttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/pages/
    Authors
    Gallup International, Inc.
    License

    https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/24661/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/24661/terms

    Time period covered
    2000
    Area covered
    Netherlands, Paraguay, Denmark, Cameroon, Finland, Malaysia, Switzerland, France, Taiwan, Pakistan
    Description

    This annual survey, fielded August to October 1999, was conducted in over 50 countries to solicit public opinion on social and political issues. Respondents were asked to give their opinion on the environment. Questions included the overall state that the environment is in, if the government has done too much, too little, or just the right amount concerning the environment, and the biggest threat to the environment for future generations. They were also queried on whether they thought their countries elections were free and fair, and what words best describe their perception of the government. Questions concerning religion were also asked. These focused on whether there is only one true religion, many true religions, or no essential truth in any religion, how important God is in their life, and praying and meditation. Respondents were asked to give their opinion on women's rights. Questions included whether they thought women have equal rights in their country, whether they thought education is more important for boys or girls, whether women need to have children in order to feel fulfilled, and whether women in advanced countries must insist more for the rights of women in the developing world. They were also asked to give their opinion on the issue of crime. They were asked how concerned they were about the level of crime in their country, if crime had increased or decreased in the last five years, how well the government was handling crime, and if they were for or against the death penalty. They were also asked what they thought matters most in life, and what they thought about the United Nations. Questions pertaining to human rights were also asked, such as whether discrimination based on sex, color, language, religion, or political opinion was taking place in their country. They were also asked if they thought that the use of torture was being documented, how effective stricter international laws would be in reducing torture, how effective more prosecutions of those suspected of torture would be in eliminating it, how effective greater public awareness of the incidence of torture would be in helping eliminate it, and how effective a grassroots campaign to eliminate torture would be. Respondents were also queried on the year 2000 computer problem. Demographics include sex, age, education, occupation, marital status, children under 15 living in household, religious denomination, religiosity, and region.

  12. Voice of the People End of Year Survey, 2013

    • icpsr.umich.edu
    ascii, delimited, r +3
    Updated Apr 17, 2015
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    WIN/Gallup International Association (2015). Voice of the People End of Year Survey, 2013 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35202.v1
    Explore at:
    stata, ascii, sas, spss, delimited, rAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 17, 2015
    Dataset provided by
    Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Researchhttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/pages/
    Authors
    WIN/Gallup International Association
    License

    https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/35202/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/35202/terms

    Time period covered
    2013
    Area covered
    Finland, China (Peoples Republic), France, Colombia, Iceland, United Kingdom, Ukraine, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan
    Description

    The Voice of the People Survey Series is WIN/Gallup International Association's End of Year survey and is a global study that collects the public's view on the challenges that the world faces today. Ongoing since 1977, the purpose of WIN/Gallup International's End of Year survey is to provide a platform for respondents to speak out concerning government and corporate policies. The Voice of the People, End of Year Surveys for 2013, fielded September to December 2013, were conducted in 66 countries to solicit public opinion on social and political issues. Respondents were asked to give their opinion in regards to how the economic situation in their country would fluctuate over the next year, as well as rate their personal happiness. Additional questions included what respondents felt was the most important problem facing the world today, and whether religion plays a positive or negative role in their country. Respondents were also queried on what country they would like to live in, whether more women politicians would make the world a better place, which country they believe is the greatest threat to world peace, and corruption within their country. Demographic information includes age, income, education level, employment status, religious affiliation, and household family composition.

  13. Food Insecurity Experience Scale 2022 - Poland

    • microdata.worldbank.org
    • datacatalog.ihsn.org
    Updated Sep 26, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    FAO Statistics Division (2023). Food Insecurity Experience Scale 2022 - Poland [Dataset]. https://microdata.worldbank.org/index.php/catalog/6055
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 26, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Food and Agriculture Organizationhttp://fao.org/
    Authors
    FAO Statistics Division
    Time period covered
    2022
    Area covered
    Poland
    Description

    Abstract

    Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) target 2.1 commits countries to end hunger, ensure access by all people to safe, nutritious and sufficient food all year around. Indicator 2.1.2, “Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity based on the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES)”, provides internationally-comparable estimates of the proportion of the population facing difficulties in accessing food. More detailed background information is available at http://www.fao.org/in-action/voices-of-the-hungry/fies/en/ .

    The FIES-based indicators are compiled using the FIES survey module, containing 8 questions. Two indicators can be computed:
    1. The proportion of the population experiencing moderate or severe food insecurity (SDG indicator 2.1.2), 2. The proportion of the population experiencing severe food insecurity.

    These data were collected by FAO through the Gallup World Poll. General information on the methodology can be found here: https://www.gallup.com/178667/gallup-world-poll-work.aspx. National institutions can also collect FIES data by including the FIES survey module in nationally representative surveys.

    Microdata can be used to calculate the indicator 2.1.2 at national level. Instructions for computing this indicator are described in the methodological document available in the documentations tab. Disaggregating results at sub-national level is not encouraged because estimates will suffer from substantial sampling and measurement error.

    Geographic coverage

    National

    Analysis unit

    Individuals

    Universe

    Individuals of 15 years or older with access to landline and/or mobile phones.

    Kind of data

    Sample survey data [ssd]

    Sampling procedure

    NA Exclusions: NA Design effect: 1.26

    Mode of data collection

    Face-to-Face [f2f]

    Cleaning operations

    Statistical validation assesses the quality of the FIES data collected by testing their consistency with the assumptions of the Rasch model. This analysis involves the interpretation of several statistics that reveal 1) items that do not perform well in a given context, 2) cases with highly erratic response patterns, 3) pairs of items that may be redundant, and 4) the proportion of total variance in the population that is accounted for by the measurement model.

    Sampling error estimates

    The margin of error is estimated as 3.5. This is calculated around a proportion at the 95% confidence level. The maximum margin of error was calculated assuming a reported percentage of 50% and takes into account the design effect.

  14. i

    Global Financial Inclusion (Global Findex) Database 2021 - Niger

    • catalog.ihsn.org
    • microdata.worldbank.org
    Updated Jun 9, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Development Research Group, Finance and Private Sector Development Unit (2023). Global Financial Inclusion (Global Findex) Database 2021 - Niger [Dataset]. https://catalog.ihsn.org/catalog/11354
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 9, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Development Research Group, Finance and Private Sector Development Unit
    Time period covered
    2022
    Area covered
    Niger
    Description

    Abstract

    The fourth edition of the Global Findex offers a lens into how people accessed and used financial services during the COVID-19 pandemic, when mobility restrictions and health policies drove increased demand for digital services of all kinds.

    The Global Findex is the world’s most comprehensive database on financial inclusion. It is also the only global demand-side data source allowing for global and regional cross-country analysis to provide a rigorous and multidimensional picture of how adults save, borrow, make payments, and manage financial risks. Global Findex 2021 data were collected from national representative surveys of almost 145,000 people in 139 economies, representing 97 percent of the world’s population. The latest edition follows the 2011, 2014, and 2017 editions, and it includes a number of new series measuring financial health and resilience and contains more granular data on digital payment adoption, including merchant and government payments.

    The Global Findex is an indispensable resource for financial service practitioners, policy makers, researchers, and development professionals.

    Geographic coverage

    Some communes in the Agadez region and Diffa region were excluded because of insecurity. In addition PSUs with fewer than 25 households were also excluded. The excluded area represents approximately 8% of the population.

    Kind of data

    Observation data/ratings [obs]

    Sampling procedure

    In most developing economies, Global Findex data have traditionally been collected through face-to-face interviews. Surveys are conducted face-to-face in economies where telephone coverage represents less than 80 percent of the population or where in-person surveying is the customary methodology. However, because of ongoing COVID-19–related mobility restrictions, face-to-face interviewing was not possible in some of these economies in 2021. Phone-based surveys were therefore conducted in 67 economies that had been surveyed face-to-face in 2017. These 67 economies were selected for inclusion based on population size, phone penetration rate, COVID-19 infection rates, and the feasibility of executing phone-based methods where Gallup would otherwise conduct face-to-face data collection, while complying with all government-issued guidance throughout the interviewing process. Gallup takes both mobile phone and landline ownership into consideration. According to Gallup World Poll 2019 data, when face-to-face surveys were last carried out in these economies, at least 80 percent of adults in almost all of them reported mobile phone ownership. All samples are probability-based and nationally representative of the resident adult population. Additionally, phone surveys were not a viable option in 16 economies in 2021, which were then surveyed in 2022.

    In economies where face-to-face surveys are conducted, the first stage of sampling is the identification of primary sampling units. These units are stratified by population size, geography, or both, and clustering is achieved through one or more stages of sampling. Where population information is available, sample selection is based on probabilities proportional to population size; otherwise, simple random sampling is used. Random route procedures are used to select sampled households. Unless an outright refusal occurs, interviewers make up to three attempts to survey the sampled household. To increase the probability of contact and completion, attempts are made at different times of the day and, where possible, on different days. If an interview cannot be obtained at the initial sampled household, a simple substitution method is used. Respondents are randomly selected within the selected households. Each eligible household member is listed, and the hand-held survey device randomly selects the household member to be interviewed. For paper surveys, the Kish grid method is used to select the respondent. In economies where cultural restrictions dictate gender matching, respondents are randomly selected from among all eligible adults of the interviewer's gender.

    In traditionally phone-based economies, respondent selection follows the same procedure as in previous years, using random digit dialing or a nationally representative list of phone numbers. In most economies where mobile phone and landline penetration is high, a dual sampling frame is used.

    The same respondent selection procedure is applied to the new phone-based economies. Dual frame (landline and mobile phone) random digital dialing is used where landline presence and use are 20 percent or higher based on historical Gallup estimates. Mobile phone random digital dialing is used in economies with limited to no landline presence (less than 20 percent).

    For landline respondents in economies where mobile phone or landline penetration is 80 percent or higher, random selection of respondents is achieved by using either the latest birthday or household enumeration method. For mobile phone respondents in these economies or in economies where mobile phone or landline penetration is less than 80 percent, no further selection is performed. At least three attempts are made to reach a person in each household, spread over different days and times of day.

    Sample size for Niger is 1000.

    Mode of data collection

    Face-to-face [f2f]

    Research instrument

    Questionnaires are available on the website.

    Sampling error estimates

    Estimates of standard errors (which account for sampling error) vary by country and indicator. For country-specific margins of error, please refer to the Methodology section and corresponding table in Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli, Leora Klapper, Dorothe Singer, Saniya Ansar. 2022. The Global Findex Database 2021: Financial Inclusion, Digital Payments, and Resilience in the Age of COVID-19. Washington, DC: World Bank.

  15. C

    Replication data for "High life satisfaction reported among small-scale...

    • dataverse.csuc.cat
    csv, txt
    Updated Feb 7, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Eric Galbraith; Eric Galbraith; Victoria Reyes Garcia; Victoria Reyes Garcia (2024). Replication data for "High life satisfaction reported among small-scale societies with low incomes" [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.34810/data904
    Explore at:
    csv(1620), csv(7829), txt(7017), csv(227502)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 7, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    CORA.Repositori de Dades de Recerca
    Authors
    Eric Galbraith; Eric Galbraith; Victoria Reyes Garcia; Victoria Reyes Garcia
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 2021 - Oct 24, 2023
    Area covered
    China, Shangri-la, Darjeeling, India, Nepal, Laprak, Mafia Island, Tanzania, United Republic of, Kumbungu, Ghana, Senegal, Bassari country, Fiji, Ba, Western highlands, Guatemala, Bulgan soum, Mongolia, Puna, Argentina
    Dataset funded by
    European Commission
    Description

    This dataset was created in order to document self-reported life evaluations among small-scale societies that exist on the fringes of mainstream industrialized socieities. The data were produced as part of the LICCI project, through fieldwork carried out by LICCI partners. The data include individual responses to a life satisfaction question, and household asset values. Data from Gallup World Poll and the World Values Survey are also included, as used for comparison. TABULAR DATA-SPECIFIC INFORMATION --------------------------------- 1. File name: LICCI_individual.csv Number of rows and columns: 2814,7 Variable list: Variable names: User, Site, village Description: identification of investigator and location Variable name: Well.being.general Description: numerical score for life satisfaction question Variable names: HH_Assets_US, HH_Assets_USD_capita Description: estimated value of representative assets in the household of respondent, total and per capita (accounting for number of household inhabitants) 2. File name: LICCI_bySite.csv Number of rows and columns: 19,8 Variable list: Variable names: Site, N Description: site name and number of respondents at the site Variable names: SWB_mean, SWB_SD Description: mean and standard deviation of life satisfaction score Variable names: HHAssets_USD_mean, HHAssets_USD_sd Description: Site mean and standard deviation of household asset value Variable names: PerCapAssets_USD_mean, PerCapAssets_USD_sd Description: Site mean and standard deviation of per capita asset value 3. File name: gallup_WVS_GDP_pk.csv Number of rows and columns: 146,8 Variable list: Variable name: Happiness Score, Whisker-high, Whisker-low Description: from Gallup World Poll as documented in World Happiness Report 2022. Variable name: GDP-PPP2017 Description: Gross Domestic Product per capita for year 2020 at PPP (constant 2017 international $). Accessed May 2022. Variable name: pk Description: Produced capital per capita for year 2018 (in 2018 US$) for available countries, as estimated by the World Bank (accessed February 2022). Variable names: WVS7_mean, WVS7_std Description: Results of Question 49 in the World Values Survey, Wave 7.

  16. Correlations between variables in Study 1.

    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Paula M. Niedenthal; Magdalena Rychlowska; Adrienne Wood; Fangyun Zhao (2023). Correlations between variables in Study 1. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197651.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Paula M. Niedenthal; Magdalena Rychlowska; Adrienne Wood; Fangyun Zhao
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Correlations between variables in Study 1.

  17. S

    Canadian Gallup Poll, May 1956, #248

    • dataverse.scholarsportal.info
    • borealisdata.ca
    • +2more
    pdf, tsv
    Updated Oct 11, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Scholars Portal Dataverse (2019). Canadian Gallup Poll, May 1956, #248 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5683/SP2/TTZAZD
    Explore at:
    pdf(570396), tsv(393304), pdf(613840)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 11, 2019
    Dataset provided by
    Scholars Portal Dataverse
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Canada
    Description

    This Gallup polls seeks the opinions of Canadians on current events in Canada and around the world, the continuing development of industry and communities in Canada, and some lighter topics including holidays. Respondents were also asked questions so that they could be grouped according to geographic, demographic, and social variables. Topics of interest include: American influence over Canada; American investment in Canada; the conflict between Israel and the Arabs; arms sales in Canada; bilingualism and unity; the British commonwealth; federal elections; flouridation of water; gender issues; how to spend holidays; major development of Canada; preferred political parties; prevention of war; standards of living; union membership; the United Nations; and voting behaviour. Basic demographics variables are also included.

  18. Food Insecurity Experience Scale 2023 - Moldova

    • microdata.worldbank.org
    • catalog.ihsn.org
    Updated Oct 18, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    FAO Statistics Division (2024). Food Insecurity Experience Scale 2023 - Moldova [Dataset]. https://microdata.worldbank.org/index.php/catalog/6319
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 18, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Food and Agriculture Organizationhttp://fao.org/
    Authors
    FAO Statistics Division
    Time period covered
    2023
    Area covered
    Moldova
    Description

    Abstract

    Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) target 2.1 commits countries to end hunger, ensure access by all people to safe, nutritious and sufficient food all year around. Indicator 2.1.2, “Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity based on the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES)”, provides internationally-comparable estimates of the proportion of the population facing difficulties in accessing food. More detailed background information is available at http://www.fao.org/in-action/voices-of-the-hungry/fies/en/

    The FIES-based indicators are compiled using the FIES survey module, containing 8 questions. Two indicators can be computed:
    1. The proportion of the population experiencing moderate or severe food insecurity (SDG indicator 2.1.2), 2. The proportion of the population experiencing severe food insecurity.

    These data were collected by FAO through the Gallup World Poll. General information on the methodology can be found here: https://www.gallup.com/178667/gallup-world-poll-work.aspx. National institutions can also collect FIES data by including the FIES survey module in nationally representative surveys.

    Microdata can be used to calculate the indicator 2.1.2 at national level. Instructions for computing this indicator are described in the methodological document available in the downloads tab. Disaggregating results at sub-national level is not encouraged because estimates will suffer from substantial sampling and measurement error.

    Geographic coverage

    National

    Analysis unit

    Individuals

    Universe

    Individuals of 15 years or older with access to landline and/or mobile phones.

    Kind of data

    Sample survey data [ssd]

    Sampling procedure

    With some exceptions, all samples are probability based and nationally representative of the resident adult population. The coverage area is the entire country including rural areas, and the sampling frame represents the entire civilian, non-institutionalized, aged 15 and older population. For more details on the overall sampling and data collection methodology, see the World poll methodology attached as a resource in the downloads tab. Specific sampling details for each country are also attached as technical documents in the downloads tab. Exclusions: Transnistria (Prednestrovie) excluded for safety of interviewers. The excluded area represents approximately 13% of the population. Design effect: 1.97

    Mode of data collection

    Face-to-Face [f2f]

    Cleaning operations

    Statistical validation assesses the quality of the FIES data collected by testing their consistency with the assumptions of the Rasch model. This analysis involves the interpretation of several statistics that reveal 1) items that do not perform well in a given context, 2) cases with highly erratic response patterns, 3) pairs of items that may be redundant, and 4) the proportion of total variance in the population that is accounted for by the measurement model.

    Sampling error estimates

    The margin of error is estimated as 4.4. This is calculated around a proportion at the 95% confidence level. The maximum margin of error was calculated assuming a reported percentage of 50% and takes into account the design effect.

  19. Correlations between variables in Study 2.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 4, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Paula M. Niedenthal; Magdalena Rychlowska; Adrienne Wood; Fangyun Zhao (2023). Correlations between variables in Study 2. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197651.t002
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 4, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Paula M. Niedenthal; Magdalena Rychlowska; Adrienne Wood; Fangyun Zhao
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Correlations between variables in Study 2.

  20. f

    Pain rates in the gallup world poll, 2009–2020 and gallup US tracker poll,...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 15, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    David G. Blanchflower; Alex Bryson (2023). Pain rates in the gallup world poll, 2009–2020 and gallup US tracker poll, 2009–2017. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261891.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 15, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    David G. Blanchflower; Alex Bryson
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    World, United States
    Description

    Pain rates in the gallup world poll, 2009–2020 and gallup US tracker poll, 2009–2017.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Stanford University Libraries (2024). 2025-02-21 Gallup World Poll [Dataset]. https://redivis.com/datasets/zqck-d60drwz0p
Organization logo

2025-02-21 Gallup World Poll

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Dec 14, 2024
Dataset provided by
Stanford University
Authors
Stanford University Libraries
Time period covered
Jun 1, 2005 - Jan 1, 2025
Area covered
World
Description

The table 2025-02-21 Gallup World Poll is part of the dataset Gallup World Poll, available at https://redivis.com/datasets/zqck-d60drwz0p. It contains 2884961 rows across 2751 variables.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu