As of February 2025, the largest fine issued for violation of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the United Kingdom (UK) was more than 22 million euros, received by British Airways in October 2020. Another fine received by Marriott International Inc. in the same month was the second-highest in the UK and amounted to over 20 million euros.

A survey conducted in April and May 2023 among companies that do business in the European Union and the United Kingdom (UK) found that over half of the respondents, ** percent, felt very prepared for the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). A further ** percent of the companies believed they were moderately prepared, while ** percent said they were slightly ready to comply with the EU and UK privacy legislations.

A survey conducted in April and May 2023 revealed that around ** percent of the companies that do business in the European Union (EU) and the United Kingdom (UK) found it challenging to adapt to new or changing requirements of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) or Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA). A further ** percent of the survey respondents said it was challenging to increase the budget because of the changes in the data privacy laws.

With this dataset, you get access to names of officers – individuals appointed by the board of directors to manage the day-to-day operations of a company, and shareholders – individuals or entities that own shares in a company.

This dataset can be a great resource for understanding the corporate hierarchy, analyzing ownership structures, conducting due diligence, or evaluating potential business partnerships.

In the United Kingdom, consumer concerns around use of personal data by companies centered on more accountability from the side of the companies, according to a survey conducted among internet users in the UK. ** percent of respondents said they thought companies should be held accountable in the case of data misuse. Another ** percent of consumers who took part in the survey said they wanted to see transparency on marketing and advertising practices carried out by companies.

HitHorizons UK B2B Data gives access to aggregated company data on 80M+ companies from the whole of Europe and beyond.

Company registration data: company name national identifier and its type registered address: street, postal code, city, state / province, country business activity: SIC code, local activity code with classification system year of establishment company type location type

Sales and number of employees data: sales in EUR, USD and local currency (with local currency code) total number of employees sales and number of employees accuracy local number of employees (in case of multiple branches) companies’ sales and number of employees market position compared to other companies in a country / industry / region

Industry data: size of the whole industry size of all companies operating within a particular SIC code benchmarking within a particular country or industry regional benchmarking (EU 27, state / province)

Contact details: company website company email domain (without person’s name)

Invoicing details available for selected countries: company name company address company VAT number.

Deze dataset is een centrale catalogus van Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIA's) van smart city-projecten die persoonlijke informatie verzamelen in openbare ruimtes. Door dit voor het eerst op één plaats te publiceren, zal het publieke transparantie mogelijk maken en goede praktijken onder exploitanten ondersteunen.

Een DPIA helpt bij het identificeren en minimaliseren van de risico's van een project dat persoonsgegevens gebruikt.

DPIA registratieformulier: "https://www.london.gov.uk/dpia-register-form" target="_blank" style="color: rgb(158, 0, 98);">https://www.london.gov.uk/dpia-register-form

Informatiecommissaris DPIA: https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/accountability-and-governance/data-protection-impact-assessments/

Deze dataset is een centrale catalogus van Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIA's) van smart city-projecten die persoonlijke informatie verzamelen in openbare ruimtes. Door dit voor het eerst op één plaats te publiceren, zal het publieke transparantie mogelijk maken en goede praktijken onder exploitanten ondersteunen.

Een DPIA helpt bij het identificeren en minimaliseren van de risico's van een project dat persoonsgegevens gebruikt.

DPIA registratieformulier: "https://www.london.gov.uk/dpia-register-form" target="_blank" style="color: rgb(158, 0, 98);">https://www.london.gov.uk/dpia-register-form

Informatiecommissaris DPIA: "https://data.london.gov.uk/dpia/_wp_link_placeholder" target="_blank" style="color: rgb(158, 0, 98);">https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/accountability-and-governance/data-protection-impact-assessments/

Whilst this some of the requested information is held by the NHSBSA, we have exempted some of the figures under section 40(2) subsections 2 and 3(a) of the FOIA because it is personal data of applicants to the VDPS. This is because it would breach the first data protection principle as: a - it is not fair to disclose individual’s personal details to the world and is likely to cause damage or distress. b - these details are not of sufficient interest to the public to warrant an intrusion into the privacy of the individual. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/36/section/40 Information Commissioner Office (ICO) Guidance is that information is personal data if it ‘relates to’ an ‘identifiable individual’ regulated by the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR) or the Data Protection Act 2018. The information relates to personal data of the VDPS claimants and is special category data in the form of health information. As a result, the claimants could be identified, when combined with other information that may be in the public domain or reasonably available. Online communities exist for those adversely affected by vaccines they have received. This further increases the likelihood that those may be identified by disclosure of this information. Section 40(2) is an absolute, prejudice-based exemption and therefore is exempt if disclosure would contravene any of the data protection principles. To comply with the lawfulness, fairness, and transparency data protection principle, we either need the consent of the data subject(s) or there must be a legitimate interest in disclosure. In addition, the disclosure must be necessary to meet the legitimate interest and finally, the disclosure must not cause unwarranted harm. The NHSBSA has considered this and does not have the consent of the data subjects to release this information and believes that it would not be possible to obtain consent that meets the threshold in Article 7 of the UK GDPR. The NHSBSA acknowledges that you have a legitimate interest in disclosure of the information to provide the full picture of data held by the NHSBSA; however, we have concluded that disclosure of the requested information would cause unwarranted harm and therefore, section 40(2) is engaged. This is because there is a reasonable expectation that patient data processed by the NHSBSA remains confidential, especially special category data. There are no reasonable alternative measures that could meet the legitimate aim. As the information is highly confidential and sensitive, it outweighs the legitimate interest in the information. Section 41 FOIA This information is also exempt under section 41 of the FOIA (information provided in confidence). This is because the requested information was provided to the NHSBSA in confidence by a third party - another individual, company, public authority or any other type of legal entity. In this instance, details have been provided by the claimants. For Section 41 to be engaged, the following criteria must be fulfilled:

A privacy risk assessment framework for practitioners to help support with conducting Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) and Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs). The framework will also allow practitioners to create and maintain a GDPR compliant data register and a privacy risk register that will access risks to both the organisation (the data controller) and the individual(s) whose data is being processed (the data subject(s)). If you need any support with using this framework, do please reach out to me (jhenriksenbulmer@bournemouth.ac.uk) Thanks for showing an interest Jane Henriksen-Bulmer

Explore the historical Whois records related to gdpr-certification.co.uk (Domain). Get insights into ownership history and changes over time.

GDPR Services Market size was valued at USD 1.6 Billion in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 7.3 Billion by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 22.45% from 2024 to 2031.

Global GDPR Services Market Drivers

Increased Regulatory Enforcement: Stricter enforcement of the GDPR by regulatory authorities has increased the pressure on organizations to comply with its provisions. Data Breaches and Fines: The significant fines imposed on organizations that violate GDPR have raised awareness of the risks associated with non-compliance. Consumer Awareness and Data Privacy Concerns: Consumers are becoming more aware of their data privacy rights and are demanding greater transparency and control over their personal information.

Global GDPR Services Market Restraints

High Costs: Implementing GDPR compliance measures can be expensive, particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises. Complexity and Overwhelm: The GDPR is a complex regulation, and organizations may struggle to understand and implement all its requirements. Lack of Internal Expertise: Many organizations may lack the necessary in-house expertise to ensure GDPR compliance.

The dataset contains news articles from French, German, UK, and US sources about GDPR media discourse.

With the implementation of GDPR in the European Union as of ************, concerns have surfaced about collecting and using consumer data across all types of organizations. In the retail sector, GDPR proves to be a challenge in front of personalization services provided by e-commerce and multichannel retailers. In the UK and France, ** percent of retailers believed GDPR will have a big impact on reaching consistent database communities and sharing info with third parties. In a similar fashion, more than half of respondents said gathering useful data on consumers will be impacted by GDPR.

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic brought global disruption to health, society and economy, including to the conduct of clinical research. In the European Union (EU), the legal and ethical framework for research is complex and divergent. Many challenges exist in relation to the interplay of the various applicable rules, particularly with respect to compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). This study aimed to gain insights into the experience of key clinical research stakeholders [investigators, ethics committees (ECs), and data protection officers (DPOs)/legal experts working with clinical research sponsors] across the EU and the UK on the main challenges related to data protection in clinical research before and during the pandemic.Materials and methodsThe study consisted of an online survey and follow-up semi-structured interviews. Data collection occurred between April and December 2021. Survey data was analyzed descriptively, and the interviews underwent a framework analysis.Results and conclusionIn total, 191 respondents filled in the survey, of whom fourteen participated in the follow-up interviews. Out of the targeted 28 countries (EU and UK), 25 were represented in the survey. The majority of stakeholders were based in Western Europe. This study empirically elucidated numerous key legal and ethical issues related to GDPR compliance in the context of (cross-border) clinical research. It showed that the lack of legal harmonization remains the biggest challenge in the field, and that it is present not only at the level of the interplay of key EU legislative acts and national implementation of the GDPR, but also when it comes to interpretation at local, regional and institutional levels. Moreover, the role of ECs in data protection was further explored and possible ways forward for its normative delineation were discussed. According to the participants, the pandemic did not bring additional legal challenges. Although practical challenges (for instance, mainly related to the provision of information to patients) were high due to the globally enacted crisis measures, the key problematic issues on (cross-border) health research, interpretations of the legal texts and compliance strategies remained largely the same.

Between 2018 and 2022, there has been a significant increase in the level of awareness around the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) among European users. In 2018, when the GDPR was first applied, the United Kingdom had the highest level of awareness, with 32 percent of respondents agreeing or strongly agreeing with the statement: "I am aware of the new General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) that will be introduced in May 2018". In 2022, the share of UK respondents agreeing with the statement increased to 73 percent. France had the lowest level of awareness in 2018, 20 percent, whereas in 2022 it reached 47 percent but remained the lowest among other European markets.

Since the enforcement of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in May 2018, fines have been issued for several types of violations. As of February 2025, the most significant share of penalties was due to companies' non-compliance with general data processing principles. This violation has led to over 2.4 billion euros worth of fines.

We are the top supplier of GDPR and PECR compliant B2B data in the UK. We maintain our market-leading position thanks to our meticulous gathering and upkeep of business and individual contact information.

We are unique in the industry because we are the only organisation using industry leading technology and advanced AI techniques to drive our data capture and a call centre to verify all our UK B2B data to ensure completeness, accuracy, and GDPR/PECR compliance.

Built over the last 50 years specifically for marketing purposes, our dataset has evolved over time now incorporating sources from directory partners, open data, telecom providers, Companies House, PAF, credit reference agencies and other data partners.

Question 2 National Audit Office (NAO) are the auditors of the NHS Pension Scheme Accounts. The main contact at NAO has not consented to the disclosure and is therefore exempt under 40 subsections 2 and 3A (a) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, as disclosure of this information would be unfair and as such this would breach the UK GDPR first data protection principle because: a) it is not fair to disclose main contact of the NAO personal details to the world and is likely to cause damage or distress. b) these details are not of sufficient interest to the public to warrant an intrusion into the privacy of the main contact of the NAO. NAO have provided the name of the Auditor General, Gareth Davies Government Internal Audit Agency (GIAA) currently provide Internal Audit for the NHSBSA. This includes the following areas of NHS pensions for 2023/24: Member Data McCloud and other Legislative Changes . Pensions Annual Allowance Charge Compensation Scheme (PAACCS) My NHS Pensions Portal Government Internal Audit Agency (GIAA) - The main contact at GIAA has not consented to the disclosure and is therefore exempt under 40 subsections 2 and 3A (a) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, as disclosure of this information would be unfair and as such this would breach the UK GDPR first data protection principle because: a) it is not fair to disclose main contact of the Government Internal Audit Agency’s personal details to the world and is likely to cause damage or distress. b) these details are not of sufficient interest to the public to warrant an intrusion into the privacy of the main contact of the Government Internal Audit Agency. Please click the below web link to see the exemption in full. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/36/section/40 Question 3 National Audit Office (NAO) National Audit Office 157-197 Buckingham Palace Road London SW1W 9SP Government Internal Audit Agency (GIAA) Governance Team Corporate Services Directorate Government Internal Audit Agency 10 Victoria Street Westminster London SW1H 0NB United Kingdom Question 4