As of February 2025, the largest fine issued for violation of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the United Kingdom (UK) was more than 22 million euros, received by British Airways in October 2020. Another fine received by Marriott International Inc. in the same month was the second-highest in the UK and amounted to over 20 million euros.

A survey conducted in April and May 2023 revealed that around ** percent of the companies that do business in the European Union (EU) and the United Kingdom (UK) found it challenging to adapt to new or changing requirements of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) or Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA). A further ** percent of the survey respondents said it was challenging to increase the budget because of the changes in the data privacy laws.

This statistic shows the results of a survey on the share of respondents that agreed with selected statements on the EU General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) legislation in the United Kingdom (UK) in 2017. During the survey, ** percent of IT decision makers either strongly agreed or agreed that they faced some serious challenges in being compliant with the EU GDPR by ************.

This statistic shows the results of a survey on how aware consumers were of their rights regarding data protection under the upcoming GDPR legislation in the United Kingdom (UK) as of December 2017. The survey, that looked into consumer attitudes towards sharing their personal data with businesses, found that ** percent of respondents stated to never have heard of the new data protection regulations that will apply from ********** onwards.

List of properties licensed under the Council’s HMO Licensing Scheme. This list is updated on a monthly basis. Under section 232 of The Housing Act 2004 the London Borough of Barnet is required to maintain and make available a public register of licensed Houses in Multiple Occupations. An extract of the register is published on the Council’s website here. The dataset is not intended for marketing purposes and none of the individuals or organisations mentioned within this register have given their consent for such use. Companies wishing to use this data for commercial purposes, and marketing in particular, are advised to consider whether their use of this data complies with the UK General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR), Data Protection Act 2018, and the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations 2003. Information Rights are upheld by the Information Commissioners Office, for further information, see the Information Commissioner’s Office website at ww.ico.org.uk. More information on Houses in Multiple Occupancy can be found on our website as well as on the council's Planning portal. You will need to select "Houses in Multiple Occupation" from the drop-down menu and click "Search":

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic brought global disruption to health, society and economy, including to the conduct of clinical research. In the European Union (EU), the legal and ethical framework for research is complex and divergent. Many challenges exist in relation to the interplay of the various applicable rules, particularly with respect to compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). This study aimed to gain insights into the experience of key clinical research stakeholders [investigators, ethics committees (ECs), and data protection officers (DPOs)/legal experts working with clinical research sponsors] across the EU and the UK on the main challenges related to data protection in clinical research before and during the pandemic.Materials and methodsThe study consisted of an online survey and follow-up semi-structured interviews. Data collection occurred between April and December 2021. Survey data was analyzed descriptively, and the interviews underwent a framework analysis.Results and conclusionIn total, 191 respondents filled in the survey, of whom fourteen participated in the follow-up interviews. Out of the targeted 28 countries (EU and UK), 25 were represented in the survey. The majority of stakeholders were based in Western Europe. This study empirically elucidated numerous key legal and ethical issues related to GDPR compliance in the context of (cross-border) clinical research. It showed that the lack of legal harmonization remains the biggest challenge in the field, and that it is present not only at the level of the interplay of key EU legislative acts and national implementation of the GDPR, but also when it comes to interpretation at local, regional and institutional levels. Moreover, the role of ECs in data protection was further explored and possible ways forward for its normative delineation were discussed. According to the participants, the pandemic did not bring additional legal challenges. Although practical challenges (for instance, mainly related to the provision of information to patients) were high due to the globally enacted crisis measures, the key problematic issues on (cross-border) health research, interpretations of the legal texts and compliance strategies remained largely the same.

Age-Appropriate Design Compliance AI Market Outlook

As per our latest research, the global Age-Appropriate Design Compliance AI market size reached USD 1.42 billion in 2024, reflecting a robust momentum driven by regulatory mandates and the increasing digital engagement of children. The market is projected to expand at a CAGR of 23.7% from 2025 to 2033, resulting in a forecasted market value of USD 11.65 billion by 2033. The primary growth factor is the surge in global legislation such as the UK’s Age Appropriate Design Code and California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act, which are compelling digital service providers to adopt AI-driven compliance solutions to protect children’s data and online experiences.

A significant growth driver for the Age-Appropriate Design Compliance AI market is the rapid proliferation of digital platforms frequented by children and adolescents. As social media, gaming, educational technology, and content streaming services increasingly cater to younger audiences, the need for AI-powered compliance tools has become essential. These tools enable organizations to automatically detect, categorize, and restrict access to age-inappropriate content, ensuring adherence to evolving privacy and safety standards. The growing sophistication of AI algorithms has made it possible to analyze user behavior, verify ages, and personalize content delivery in a compliant manner, which further propels the adoption of such solutions across industries.

Another key factor accelerating market growth is the heightened awareness among parents, educators, and policymakers regarding online child safety. The rising incidents of cyberbullying, exposure to inappropriate content, and data breaches involving minors have led to increased scrutiny of digital platforms. This has prompted organizations to invest in advanced compliance AI solutions that not only fulfill legal obligations but also build trust with users and stakeholders. The integration of AI with privacy-enhancing technologies, such as differential privacy and federated learning, has enabled platforms to offer robust protection without compromising user experience, further boosting market expansion.

In addition to regulatory and societal pressures, technological advancements in natural language processing, computer vision, and behavioral analytics are transforming the landscape of age-appropriate design compliance. AI-powered systems are now capable of contextually understanding multimedia content, detecting subtle cues that indicate age-inappropriate material, and dynamically adapting interfaces to suit different age groups. This technological progress is reducing the manual burden on compliance teams and enabling scalable implementation across global operations. As a result, organizations are increasingly viewing compliance AI not just as a regulatory necessity, but as a strategic differentiator in a competitive digital market.

From a regional perspective, North America currently leads the Age-Appropriate Design Compliance AI market, accounting for nearly 39% of the global revenue in 2024. The region’s dominance is attributed to early adoption of privacy regulations, high digital penetration, and a strong presence of technology companies. Europe follows closely, buoyed by the implementation of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the UK’s pioneering Age Appropriate Design Code. Meanwhile, the Asia Pacific region is witnessing the fastest growth, with a projected CAGR of 27.1% through 2033, as countries such as China, Japan, and India enhance their regulatory frameworks and digital infrastructure. The regional outlook underscores the global imperative for age-appropriate design compliance and the pivotal role of AI in achieving it.

Component Analysis

The Component segment of the Age-Appropriate Design Compliance AI market is bifurcated into Software and Services, both playing distinct yet complementary roles in the ecosystem. Software solutions form the backbone of compliance operations, offering advanced functionalities such as age verification, content moderation, behavioral analytics, and policy enforcement. These AI-driven platforms leverage cutting-edge technologies, including machine learning, natural language processing, and computer vision, to automate the identification and management of age-sensitive content. The demand for highly

This statistic shows the results of a survey on budget allocation to comply with the EU General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) by organizations in the United Kingdom (UK) in 2017. During the survey, 15 percent of UK IT decision makers stated that their organization had a separate budget to become compliant with the GDPR and that it was sufficient.

This statistic shows the results of a survey on the opinion of IT decision makers regarding the drawbacks of the EU General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) for citizens in the United Kingdom (UK) in 2017. During the survey, ** percent of respondents stated that they felt their data was no safer as a result since cyber attackers would still find a way to access it if they wanted to.

In September 2024, the Irish Data Protection Commission fined Meta Ireland 91 million euros after passwords of social media users were stored in 'plaintext' on Meta's internal systems rather than with cryptographic protection or encryption. In May 2023, the EU fined Meta 1.2 billion euros for violating laws on digital privacy and putting the data of EU citizens at risk through Facebook's EU-U.S. data transfers. European privacy legislation is seen as being far stricter than American privacy law, and the sending of EU citizens’ data to the United States resulted in the record breaking penalty being issued to the tech giant. In January 2023, after it was discovered that Meta Platforms had improperly required that users of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp accept personalized adverts to use the platforms, the company was issued a 390 million euro fine by the European Commission. EU regulators claim that the social media giant broke the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) by including the demand in its terms of service. In addition, Meta was fined 405 million euros by the Irish Data Protection Commission (DPC) in September 2022 for violating Instagram's children's privacy settings. In November 2022, the DPC fined Meta a further 265 million euros for failing to protect their users from data scraping. GDPR violations in 2022 Social media sites and companies are not the only types of online services upon which users' data can potentially be compromised. In 2022, the online service with the biggest fine for violating GDPR was e-commerce and digital powerhouse Amazon, which was issued a 746 million euro fine. Furthermore, in December 2021, Google was penalized 90 million euros for GDPR violations. What are the most common GDPR violations? Since GDPR went into effect in May 2018, fines have been imposed for a variety of reasons. As of June 2022, companies' non-compliance with general data processing principles accounted for the largest share of fines, resulting in over 845 million euros worth of penalties. Insufficient legal basis for data processing was the second most common violation, amounting to 447 million euros in fines.