This dataset contains Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) Level 4A (L4A) Version 2 predictions of the aboveground biomass density (AGBD; in Mg/ha) and estimates of the prediction standard error within each sampled geolocated laser footprint. In this version, the granules are in sub-orbits. Height metrics from simulated waveforms associated with field estimates of AGBD from multiple regions and plant functional types (PFTs) were compiled to generate a calibration dataset for models representing the combinations of world regions and PFTs (i.e., deciduous broadleaf trees, evergreen broadleaf trees, evergreen needleleaf trees, deciduous needleleaf trees, and the combination of grasslands, shrubs, and woodlands).The algorithm setting group selection used for GEDI02_A Version 2 has been modified for evergreen broadleaf trees in South America to reduce false positive errors resulting from the selection of waveform modes above ground elevation as the lowest mode. The dataset LARSE/GEDI/GEDI04_A_002_MONTHLY is a raster version of the original GEDI04_A product. The raster images are organized as monthly composites of individual orbits in the corresponding month. See User Guide for more information. The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation GEDI mission aims to characterize ecosystem structure and dynamics to enable radically improved quantification and understanding of the Earth's carbon cycle and biodiversity. The GEDI instrument, attached to the International Space Station (ISS), collects data globally between 51.6° N and 51.6° S latitudes at the highest resolution and densest sampling of the 3-dimensional structure of the Earth. The GEDI instrument consists of three lasers producing a total of eight beam ground transects, which instantaneously sample eight ~25 m footprints spaced approximately every 60 m along-track. ProductDescriptionL2A VectorLARSE/GEDI/GEDI02_A_002L2A Monthly rasterLARSE/GEDI/GEDI02_A_002_MONTHLYL2A table indexLARSE/GEDI/GEDI02_A_002_INDEXL2B VectorLARSE/GEDI/GEDI02_B_002L2B Monthly rasterLARSE/GEDI/GEDI02_B_002_MONTHLYL2B table indexLARSE/GEDI/GEDI02_B_002_INDEXL4A Biomass VectorLARSE/GEDI/GEDI04_A_002L4A Monthly rasterLARSE/GEDI/GEDI04_A_002_MONTHLYL4A table indexLARSE/GEDI/GEDI04_A_002_INDEXL4B BiomassLARSE/GEDI/GEDI04_B_002

This Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) L4B product provides 1 km x 1 km (1 km, hereafter) estimates of mean aboveground biomass density (AGBD) based on observations from mission week 19 starting on 2019-04-18 to mission week 223 ending on 2023-03-16. The GEDI L4A Footprint Biomass product converts each high-quality waveform to an AGBD prediction, and the L4B product uses the sample present within the borders of each 1 km cell to statistically infer mean AGBD. The gridding procedure is described in the GEDI L4B Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document (ATBD). Patterson et al. (2019) describes the hybrid model-based mode of inference used in the L4B product. Corresponding 1 km estimates of the standard error of the mean are also provided in the L4B product. Uncertainty is due to both GEDI's sampling of the 1 km area (as opposed to making wall-to-wall observations) and the fact that L4A biomass values are modeled in a process subject to error instead of measured in a process that may be assumed to be error-free.

This dataset provides country-level estimates of land surface mean aboveground biomass density (AGBD), total aboveground biomass (AGB) stocks, and the associated standard errors of the mean calculated using different versions of the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) Level-4B (L4B) product. The GEDI L4B product provides gridded (1 km x 1 km) estimates of AGBD within the GEDI orbital extent (between 51.6 degrees N and 51.6 degrees S). For comparison purposes, this dataset also includes national-scale National Forest Inventory (NFI) estimates of AGBD from the 2020 Global Forest Resources Assessment (FRA) published by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO, 2020) of the United Nations.The GEDI instrument produces high-resolution laser ranging observations of the 3-dimensional structure of the Earth's surface. GEDI was launched on December 5, 2018, and is attached to the International Space Station (ISS). The GEDI instrument consists of three lasers producing a total of eight beam ground transects, which consist of ~25 m footprint samples spaced approximately every 60 m along-track. The GEDI beam transects are spaced approximately 600 m apart on the Earth's surface in the cross-track direction, for an across-track width of ~4.2 km. The data are provided in comma-separated value (CSV) format.

This dataset consists of near-global, analysis-ready, multi-resolution gridded vegetation structure metrics derived from NASA Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) Level 2 and 4A products associated with 25-m diameter lidar footprints. This dataset provides a comprehensive representation of near-global vegetation structure that is inclusive of the entire vertical profile, based solely on GEDI lidar, and validated with independent data. The GEDI sensor, mounted on the International Space Station (ISS), uses eight laser beams spaced by 60 m along-track and 600 m across-track on the Earth surface to measure ground elevation and vegetation structure between approximately 52 degrees North and South latitude. Between April 17th 2019 and March 16th 2023, GEDI acquired 11 and 7.7 billion quality waveforms suitable for measuring ground elevation and vegetation structure, respectively. This dataset provides GEDI shot metrics aggregated into raster grids at three spatial resolutions: 1 km, 6 km, and 12 km. In addition to many of the standard L2 and L4A shot metrics, several additional metrics have been derived which may be particularly useful for applications in carbon and water cycling processes in earth system models, as well as forest management, biodiversity modeling, and habitat assessment. Variables include canopy height, canopy cover, plant area index, foliage height diversity, and plant area volume density at 5 m strata. Eight statistics are included for each GEDI shot metric: mean, bootstrapped standard error of the mean, median, standard deviation, interquartile range, 95th percentile, Shannon's diversity index, and shot count. Quality shot filtering methodology that aligns with the GEDI L4B Gridded Aboveground Biomass Density, Version 2.1 was used. In comparison to the current GEDI L3 dataset, this dataset provides additional gridded metrics at multiple spatial resolutions and over several temporal periods (annual and the full mission duration). Files are provided in cloud optimized GeoTIFF format.

Atmospheric CO2 concentrations are dependent on land-atmosphere carbon fluxes resultant from forest dynamics and land-use changes. These fluxes are not well-constrained, in part because reliable baseline estimates of forest carbon stocks and the associated uncertainties are lacking. NASA's Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) produces estimates of aboveground biomass density (AGBD) that are unique because GEDI's hybrid estimation framework enables formal uncertainty calculations that accompany the biomass estimates. However, GEDI's estimates are not without issue; a recent validation using design-based AGBD estimates from the US Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program revealed systematic differences between GEDI and FIA estimates within a hexagon tessellation of the continental United States. Here, we explored these differences and identified two issues impacting GEDI's estimation process: incomplete filtering of low quality GEDI observations and regional biases in GEDI's footprint-level biomass models. We developed a solution to each, in the form of improved data filtering and GEDI-FIA fusion AGBD models, developed in a scale-invariant small area estimation framework, that were compatible with hybrid estimation. We calibrated 10 regional Fay-Herriot models at the hexagon scale for application at the unit scale of GEDI footprints, for which we provide a mathematical justification and empirical testing of the models' scale-invariance. These models predicted realistic distributions of unit level AGBD, with equal or improved performance relative to GEDI's L4A models for all regions. We then produced GEDI-FIA fusion estimates that were more precise than the FIA estimates and resulted in a bias reduction of 86.7% relative to the original GEDI estimates: 19.3% due to improved data filtering and 67.5% due to the new AGBD models. Our findings indicate that (1) small area estimation models trained in a scale-invariant framework can produce realistic predictions of AGBD, and (2) there is substantial spatial variability in the relationship between GEDI forest structure metrics and AGBD. This work is a step toward achieving reliable baseline forest carbon stocks, provides a viable methodology for training remote sensing biomass models, and may serve as a reference for other investigations of GEDI AGBD estimates.

Mapping and quantification of forest biomass change are key for forest management and for forests’ contribution to the global carbon budget. We explored the potential of covering this with repeated acquisitions with TanDEM-X. We used an eight-year period in a Tanzanian miombo woodland as a test case, having repeated TanDEM-X elevation data for this period and repeated field inventory data. We also investigated the use of GEDI space–LiDAR footprint AGB estimates as an alternative to field inventory. The map of TanDEM-X elevation change appeared to be an accurate representation of the geography of forest biomass change. The relationship between TanDEM-X phase height and above-ground biomass (AGB) could be represented as a straight line passing through the origin, and this relationship was the same at both the beginning and end of the period. We obtained a similar relationship when we replaced field plot data with the GEDI data. In conclusion, temporal change in miombo woodland biomass is closely related to change in InSAR elevation, and this enabled both an accurate mapping and quantification wall to wall within 5–10% error margins. The combination of TanDEM-X and GEDI may have a near-global potential for estimation of temporal change in forest biomass.

This dataset comprises estimates of forest above-ground biomass for the years 2010, 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020. They are derived from a combination of Earth observation data, depending on the year, from the Copernicus Sentinel-1 mission, Envisat’s ASAR instrument and JAXA’s Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS-1 and ALOS-2), along with additional information from Earth observation sources. The data has been produced as part of the European Space Agency's (ESA's) Climate Change Initiative (CCI) programme by the Biomass CCI team. This release of the data is version 4. Compared to version 3, version 4 consists of an update of the three maps of AGB for the years 2010, 2017 and 2018 and new AGB maps for 2019 and 2020. New AGB change maps have been created for consecutive years (2018-2017, 2019-2018 and 2020-2019) and for a decadal interval (2020-2010). The pool of remote sensing data now includes multi-temporal observations at L-band for all biomes and for all years. The AGB maps rely on revised allometries which are now based on a longer record of spaceborne LiDAR data from the GEDI and ICESat-2 missions. Temporal information is now implemented in the retrieval algorithm to preserve biomass dynamics as expressed in the remote sensing data. Biases between 2010 and more recent years have been reduced.The data products consist of two (2) global layers that include estimates of:1) above ground biomass (AGB, unit: tons/ha i.e., Mg/ha) (raster dataset). This is defined as the mass, expressed as oven-dry weight of the woody parts (stem, bark, branches and twigs) of all living trees excluding stump and roots2) per-pixel estimates of above-ground biomass uncertainty expressed as the standard deviation in Mg/ha (raster dataset)In addition, files describing the AGB change between two consecutive years (i.e., 2018-2017, 2019-2018 and 2020-2010) and over a decade (2020-2010) are provided (labelled as 2018_2017, 2019_2018, 2020_2019 and 2020_2010). Each AGB change product consists of two sets of maps: the standard deviation of the AGB change and a quality flag of the AGB change. Note that the change itself can be simply computed as the difference between two AGB maps, so is not provided directly.Data are provided in both netcdf and geotiff format.

This dataset provides estimates of Aboveground dry woody Biomass Density (AGBD) for high northern latitude forests at a 30-m spatial resolution. It is designed both for boreal-wide mapping and filling the northern spatial data gap from NASA's Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) project. Mapping forest aboveground biomass is essential for understanding, monitoring, and managing forest carbon stocks toward climate change mitigation. The AGBD estimates cover the extent of high latitude boreal forests and extend southward to 50 degrees latitude outside the boreal zone. AGBD was predicted using two modeling steps: 1) Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression related field plot measurements of AGBD to NASA's ICESat-2 30-m lidar samples, and 2) random forest models were used to extend estimates beyond the field plots by relating ICESat-2 AGBD predictions to wall-to-wall covariate stacks from Harmonized Landsat Sentinel-2 (HLS) and the Copernicus DEM. Per-pixel uncertainties are estimated from bootstrapping both models. Non-vegetated areas (e.g. built up, water, rock, ice) were masked out. HLS composites and ICESat-2 data were from 2019-2021; three years of conditions were aggregated into the circa 2020 map. ICESat-2 data were filtered to include only strong beams, growing seasons (June through September), solar elevations less than 5 degrees, snow free land (snow flag set to 1), and "msw_flag" equal to 0 (clear skies and no observed atmospheric scattering). ICESat-2's ATL08 product was resampled to a 30-m spatial resolution to better match both the field plots and mapped pixels. HLS data (L30HLS) were used to create a greenest pixel composite of growing season multispectral data, which was then used to compute a suite of vegetation indices: NDVI, NDWI, NBR, NBR2, TCW, TCG. These were then used, in combination with the slope and elevation data from the Copernicus DEM product, to predict 30-m AGBD per 90-km tile. Estimates of mean AGBD with standard deviation are provided in cloud-optimized GeoTIFF (CoG) format. Training data are in comma-separated values (CSV) format. A polygon map of data tiles is included as a GeoPackage file and a Shapefile.

Improving tropical forest biomass predictions can accurately value tropical forests for their ecosystem services. Recently, the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) lidar was activated on the international space station (ISS) to improve biomass predictions by providing detailed 3D forest structure and height data. However, there is still debate on how best to predict tropical forest biomass using GEDI data. Here we compare GEDI predicted biomass to 2,102 tropical forest biomass plots and find that adding a remotely sensed (RS) trait map of LMA (Leaf Mass per Area) significantly (P<0.001) improves field biomass predictions, but by only a small amount (r2=0.01). However, it may also help reduce the bias of the residuals because, for instance, there was a negative relationship between both LMA (r2 of 0.34) and %P (r2=0.31) and residuals. This improvement in predictability corresponds with measurements from 523 individual trees where LMA predicts Diameter at Breast height (DBH) (the critical measurement underlying plot biomass) with an r2=0.04, and spectroscopy (400-1075 nm) predicts DBH with an r2=0.01. Adding environmental datasets may offer further improvements and max temperature (Tmax) predicts Amazonian biomass residuals with an r2 of 0.76 (N=66). Finally, for a network of net primary production (NPP) and gross primary production (GPP) plots (N=21), RS traits are better at predicting fluxes than structure variables like tree height or Height Of Median Energy (HOME). Overall, trait maps, especially future improved ones produced by surface biology geology (SBG), may improve biomass and carbon flux predictions by a small but significant amount. Methods Field leaf trait and spectroscopy data – We used leaf trait and spectral data from an extensive field campaign along an elevation gradient (from 3500 m to 220 m elevation) in the Peruvian Amazon where leaf traits for 60-80% of basal area of trees >10cm DBH were measured within a well-studied 1 ha plot network from April – November 2013 (Enquist et al., 2017). In each one ha plot (N=10 plots), we sampled the most abundant species as determined through basal area weighting (enough species generally to cover ~80% of the plot’s basal area). For each species, we sampled the five (three in the lowlands) largest trees (based on diameter at breast height (DBH)) and sampled one sun and one shade branch. On each of these branches, leaf chemistry and leaf mass area (LMA) were measured with the methodology detailed in Asner et al. (2014). On five randomly selected leaves for each branch, we measured hemispherical reflectance with an ASD Fieldspec Handheld 2 with fiber optic cable, a contact probe that has its own calibrated light source, and a leaf clip (Analytical Spectral Devices High-Intensity Contact Probe and Leaf Clip, Boulder, Colorado, USA) following (Doughty et al., 2017). We measured leaf spectroscopy (400-1075 nm) on the same branches where the leaf traits were collected. Both LMA and Chlorophyll A had previously been shown with this dataset to have a correlation with leaf spectroscopy (Doughty et al., 2017). However, we had not previously tried to compare leaf spectral data with DBH directly. Plot data – Aboveground biomass - We used 2,102 of 19,160 total AGB field plots between +30° and -30° latitude classified as broadleaf evergreen trees by MODIS PFT using public data from Duncanson et al 2022 that was organized and publicly available through ORNL DAAC as an RDS (R data serialization) file. Distribution plots are shown in Fig S1 (AGB) and S2 (residuals). NPP and GPP - We also used 21, 1 ha plots where NPP and sometimes GPP were measured following the GEM protocol (Malhi et al., 2021). We focused on two regions: a Peruvian elevation transect with both NPP + GPP (n= 10, RAINFOR plot codes are ALP11, ALP30, SPD02, SPD01, TRU03, TRU08, TRU07, ESP01, WAY01, ACJ01(Malhi et al., 2017)) and a Bornean logging transect with only NPP (n= 11 RAINFOR plot codes are DAN-04, DAN-05, LAM-01, LAM-02, MLA-01, MLA-02, SAF-01, SAF-02, SAF-03, SAF-04, SAF-05 (Riutta et al., 2018). These plots were chosen because there are large changes in NPP/GPP across the elevation or logging gradient. GEDI data – We used the vertical forest structure (L2A and L2B, Version 2) and biomass (L4a) products from the GEDI instrument (R. Dubayah et al., 2020) between April 2019 to December 2022 for tropical forest regions (R. O. Dubayah et al., 2023). We used a quality filtering recipe developed in collaboration with GEDI Science Team members from the University of Maryland and NASA Goddard to identify the highest quality GEDI vegetation shots (R. Dubayah et al., 2022). A data layer that this iterative local outlier detection algorithm uses to exclude data is publicly available at R. O. Dubayah et al., (2023). For instance, some of the key data filters we applied were: included degrade flags of 0,3,8,10,13,18,20,23,28,30,33,38,40,43,48,60,63,68, L2A and L2B quality flags = 1 (only use highest quality data), sensitivity >= 0.98. With the GEDI data, we used canopy height, the height of median energy (HOME), and the number of canopy layers following Doughty et al 2023 (Doughty et al., 2023). Across all tropical forests, we created 300 by 300 m pixels containing all averaged (mean) GEDI data between 2019 and 2022. Using the centroid coordinates from each of the 2,102 plots, we found the 300 by 300 m averaged GEDI pixel that encompassed the plot. If the plot was not encompassed by the GEDI data, we searched a wider area by incrementally averaging a gradually increasing area of 1, 3, 5, and 10 pixels. In other words, if no 300 by 300 m pixel encompassed the plot, then we averaged all GEDI data an area one pixel out (4 by 4 = 1200 by 1200 m, 6 by 6 = 1800 by 1800m, 11 by 11 = 3300m by 3300m), gradually increasing the square until it encompassed an area with GEDI data. To compare with the NPP/GPP plots we compared RS trait and GEDI data for individual footprints within a 0.03 km radius of the plot coordinates. Remotely sensed leaf trait data – Based on a broader set of field campaigns, Aguirre-Gutiérrez et al., (2021) used Sentinel-2, climatic, topography, and soil data to create remotely sensed canopy trait maps for P=phosphorus % leaf concentration, WD = wood density g.cm-3, and LMA=Leaf mass area g m-2. Other data layers – We compared % one peak to several other climates, soils, leaf traits, and ecoregion maps listed below for the Amazon basin. Each dataset had its own resolution, which we standardized to 0.1 by 0.1 degrees. We used total cation exchange capacity (CEC) from soil grids (Batjes et al., 2020) from 0-5cm in units of mmol(c)/kg. We averaged TerraClimate (Abatzoglou et al., 2018) data between 2000 and 2018 for Vapor Pressure Deficit (VPD in kPa), Mean Monthly Precipitation (MMP) (mm/month), potential evapotranspiration (PET) and maximum and minimum temperature (°C). Statistical analysis – We used the Matlab (Matlab, MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, USA) function “fitlm” to fit linear models to compare variables such as soil data, environmental data, leaf trait data (at 0.1° resolution) and GEDI structure data (300m and bigger resolution) to field biomass and NPP/GPP estimates. The P values listed are for the t-statistic of the two-sided hypothesis test. We used R to create a linear model to predict the best model ranked by AIC and parsimony using the dredge function from the MuMIn library (Bartoń, 2009). We also used the CAR package (Fox J & S, 2019) and the VIF command to test for multi-collinearity between variables. To account for spatial autocorrelation, we used Simultaneous Auto-Regressive (SARerr) models (F. Dormann et al., 2007) using the R library ‘spdep’ (Bivand, Hauke, & Kossowski, 2013). We tested different neighborhood distances from 10 km to 300 km and found that AIC was minimized at 80 km (Fig S3) and the corresponding correlogram showed reduced spatial autocorrelation (Fig S4). To predict leaf traits with the spectral information, we used the Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR) (Geladi & Kowalski, 1986) using the PLSregress command in Matlab (Matlab, MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, USA). To avoid over-fitting the number of latent factors, we minimized the mean square error with K-fold cross-validation. We use 70% of our data to calibrate our model and then the remaining 30% to test the accuracy of our model using r2. We use adjusted r2 which penalizes for small sample sizes throughout the manuscript.

מערך הנתונים הזה מורכב ממדדים של מבנה הצמחייה בחלוקה לרשתות ברזולוציות שונות, כמעט גלובליים ומוכנים לניתוח, שמקורם במוצרים ברמה 2 וברמה 4A של Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation‏ (GEDI) של NASA, שמשויכים לשטחי לידאר בקוטר 25 מטר. מערך הנתונים הזה מספק ייצוג מקיף של מבנה הצמחייה ברחבי העולם, שכולל את כל הפרופיל האנכי, על סמך …

GEDI Level 2B Canopy Cover and Vertical Profile Metrics product (GEDI02_B) extracts biophysical metrics from each GEDI waveform. These metrics are based on the directional gap probability profile derived from the L1B waveform. The vertical step between foliage profile measurements (known as dZ in GEDI documentation) is always 5 meters. The dataset LARSE/GEDI/GEDI02_B_002_MONTHLY is a raster version of the original GEDI02_B product. The raster images are organized as monthly composites of individual orbits in the corresponding month. Only root-level cover, pai and pavd values and their associated quality flags and metadata are preserved as raster bands. Each GEDI02_B_002 raster has 109 bands. See User Guide for more information. The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation GEDI mission aims to characterize ecosystem structure and dynamics to enable radically improved quantification and understanding of the Earth's carbon cycle and biodiversity. The GEDI instrument, attached to the International Space Station (ISS), collects data globally between 51.6° N and 51.6° S latitudes at the highest resolution and densest sampling of the 3-dimensional structure of the Earth. The GEDI instrument consists of three lasers producing a total of eight beam ground transects, which instantaneously sample eight ~25 m footprints spaced approximately every 60 m along-track. ProductDescriptionL2A VectorLARSE/GEDI/GEDI02_A_002L2A Monthly rasterLARSE/GEDI/GEDI02_A_002_MONTHLYL2A table indexLARSE/GEDI/GEDI02_A_002_INDEXL2B VectorLARSE/GEDI/GEDI02_B_002L2B Monthly rasterLARSE/GEDI/GEDI02_B_002_MONTHLYL2B table indexLARSE/GEDI/GEDI02_B_002_INDEXL4A Biomass VectorLARSE/GEDI/GEDI04_A_002L4A Monthly rasterLARSE/GEDI/GEDI04_A_002_MONTHLYL4A table indexLARSE/GEDI/GEDI04_A_002_INDEXL4B BiomassLARSE/GEDI/GEDI04_B_002

Dieser Datensatz besteht aus nahezu globalen, analysebereiten, mehrskalierten, gerasterten Vegetationsstrukturmesswerten, die aus den GEDI-Level-2- und 4A-Produkten (Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation) der NASA mit Lidar-Fußabdrücken mit einem Durchmesser von 25 m stammen. Dieser Datensatz bietet eine umfassende Darstellung der nahezu globalen Vegetationsstruktur, die das gesamte vertikale Profil umfasst. Er basiert ausschließlich auf GEDI-Lidar und wurde mit unabhängigen Daten validiert. Der GEDI-Sensor, der an der Internationalen Raumstation (ISS) angebracht ist, verwendet acht Laserstrahlen, die 60 m entlang der Flugbahn und 600 m quer zur Flugbahn auf der Erdoberfläche voneinander entfernt sind, um die Bodenhöhe und die Vegetationsstruktur zwischen etwa 52 Grad nördlicher und südlicher Breite zu messen. Zwischen dem 17. April 2019 und dem 16. März 2023 hat GEDI 11 und 7, 7 Milliarden hochwertige Wellenformen erfasst, die sich jeweils zur Messung der Bodenhöhe und der Vegetationsstruktur eignen. Neben vielen der standardmäßigen L2- und L4A-Schuttmesswerte wurden mehrere zusätzliche Messwerte abgeleitet, die sich besonders für Anwendungen in Kohlenstoff- und Wasserkreisläufen in Erdsystemmodellen sowie für die Forstwirtschaft, die Modellierung der Biodiversität und die Habitatbewertung eignen. Zu den Variablen gehören die Höhe des Baumbestands, die Baumbedeckung, der Pflanzenflächenindex, die Vielfalt der Laubhöhe und die Volumendichte der Pflanzenfläche in 5 m-Schichten. Weitere Informationen finden Sie unter Rasterbasierte GEDI-Messwerte zur Vegetationsstruktur und Biomassedichte. Für jeden GEDI-Shot-Messwert werden acht Statistiken berücksichtigt: Mittelwert, Bootstrap-Standardfehler des Mittelwerts, Median, Standardabweichung, Interquartilbereich, 95. Perzentil, Shannon-Diversitätsindex und Shot-Anzahl. Es wurde eine Methode zum Filtern von Aufnahmen verwendet, die der GEDI L4B-Rasterdatenbank für die oberirdische Biomassedichte (Version 2.1) entspricht. Im Vergleich zum entsprechenden GEDI-L3-Datensatz bietet dieser Datensatz zusätzliche gerasterte Messwerte in mehreren räumlichen Auflösungen und über mehrere Zeiträume hinweg (jährlich und für die gesamte Missionsdauer). Dieser Datensatz enthält GEDI-Aufnahmemesswerte, die in Rasterrastern mit drei räumlichen Auflösungen zusammengefasst sind: 1 km, 6 km und 12 km. Für diesen Datensatz wird die Pixelgröße von 6 km verwendet.

The product shows forest structure information on canopy height, total canopy cover and Above-ground biomass density (AGBD) in Germany as annual products from 2017 to 2022 in 10 m spatial resolution. The products were generated using a machine learning modelling approach that combines complementary spaceborne remote sensing sensors, namely GEDI (Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation; NASA; full-waveform LiDAR), Sentinel-1 (Synthetic-Aperture-Radar; ESA, C-band) and Sentinel-2 (Multispectral Instrument; ESA; VIS-NIR-SWIR). Sample estimates on forest structure from GEDI were modelled in 10 m spatial resolution as annual products based on spatio-temporal composites from Sentinel-1 and -2 for six years (2017 to 2022). The derived products are the first consistent data sets on canopy height, total canopy cover and AGBD for Germany which enable a quantitative assessment of recent forest structure dynamics, e.g. in the context of repeated drought events since 2018. The full description of the method and results can be found in the publication of Kacic et al. (2023).

GEDI's Level 2A Geolocated Elevation and Height Metrics Product (GEDI02_A) is primarily composed of 100 Relative Height (RH) metrics, which collectively describe the waveform collected by GEDI. The original GEDI02_A product is a table of point with a spatial resolution (average footprint) of 25 meters. Please see User Guide for more information. The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation GEDI mission aims to characterize ecosystem structure and dynamics to enable radically improved quantification and understanding of the Earth's carbon cycle and biodiversity. The GEDI instrument, attached to the International Space Station (ISS), collects data globally between 51.6° N and 51.6° S latitudes at the highest resolution and densest sampling of the 3-dimensional structure of the Earth. The GEDI instrument consists of three lasers producing a total of eight beam ground transects, which instantaneously sample eight ~25 m footprints spaced approximately every 60 m along-track. ProductDescriptionL2A VectorLARSE/GEDI/GEDI02_A_002L2A Monthly rasterLARSE/GEDI/GEDI02_A_002_MONTHLYL2A table indexLARSE/GEDI/GEDI02_A_002_INDEXL2B VectorLARSE/GEDI/GEDI02_B_002L2B Monthly rasterLARSE/GEDI/GEDI02_B_002_MONTHLYL2B table indexLARSE/GEDI/GEDI02_B_002_INDEXL4A Biomass VectorLARSE/GEDI/GEDI04_A_002L4A Monthly rasterLARSE/GEDI/GEDI04_A_002_MONTHLYL4A table indexLARSE/GEDI/GEDI04_A_002_INDEXL4B BiomassLARSE/GEDI/GEDI04_B_002

Tropical forests are a key component of the global carbon cycle. Yet, there are still high uncertainties in forest carbon stock and flux estimates, notably because of their spatial and temporal variability across the tropics. Several upcoming spaceborne missions have been designed to address this gap. High-quality ground data are essential for accurate calibration/validation so that spaceborne biomass missions can reach their full potential in reducing uncertainties regarding forest carbon stocks and fluxes. The BIOMASS mission, a P-band SAR satellite from the European Space Agency (ESA), aims at improving carbon stock mapping and reducing uncertainty in the carbon fluxes from deforestation, forest degradation, and regrowth. In situ activities in support of the BIOMASS mission were carried out in French Guiana and Gabon during the TropiSAR and AfriSAR campaigns. During these campaigns, airborne P-band SAR, forest inventory, and lidar data were collected over six study sites. This paper describes the methods used for forest inventory and lidar data collection and analysis, and presents resulting plot estimates and aboveground biomass maps. These reference datasets along with intermediate products (e.g., canopy height models) can be accessed through ESA's Forest Observation System and the Dryad data repository and will be useful for BIOMASS but also to other spaceborne biomass missions such as GEDI, NISAR, and Tandem-L for calibration/validation purposes. During data quality control and analysis, prospects for reducing uncertainties have been identified, and this paper finishes with a series of recommendations for future tropical forest field campaigns to better serve the remote sensing community.

This new dataset is a machine-learning ready dataset of high-resolution (10m), multi-modal satellite imagery, paired with AGB reference values from NASA’s Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) mission.

Bu veri kümesi, 25 m çaplı lidar ayak izleriyle ilişkili NASA Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) 2. ve 4A düzeyindeki ürünlerden türetilen, analize hazır, çok çözünürlüklü, ızgara şeklindeki bitki örtüsü yapısı metriklerinden oluşur. Bu veri kümesi, yalnızca dikey profilin tamamını kapsayan, dünya genelindeki bitki örtüsü yapısının kapsamlı bir temsilini sağlar.

This dataset is comprised of raw data from the NERC-funded, full waveform terrestrial laser scanner (TLS) deployed at sites on three continents, multiple countries and plot locations which, have been re-surveyed at different times. This plot site was situated in Peru Madre De Dios Tambopata National Reserve. The plot site had the following geographical features; Moisture type: Moist, Elevation: Lowland, Edaphic Type: Former Floodplain, Composition Mixed Forrest , Substrate Geology: Holocence, Forrestry: Old-growth.

The project scanned all trees in the permanent sample plot (PSP) spanning a range of soil fertility and productivity gradients (24 x 1 ha PSPs in total). The aim of the weighing trees with lasers project is to test if current allometric relationships are invariant across continents, or whether they differ significantly, and require continental level models; quantify the impact of assumptions of tree shape and wood density on tropical forest allometry; test hypotheses relating to pan-tropical differences in observed AGB (Above Ground Biomass) from satellite and field data. It also aims to apply new knowledge to assessing retrieval accuracy of forthcoming ESA BIOMASS and NASA GEDI (Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation Lidar) missions and providing calibration datasets; In addition to testing the capability of low-cost instruments to augment TLS data including: UAVs (unmanned aerial vehicle) for mapping cover and canopy height; low-cost lidar instruments to assess biomass rapidly, at lower accuracy.

Dieser Datensatz enthält Version 2 der GEDI-Ebenen 4A (L4A) der Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) mit Vorhersagen der überirdischen Biomassedichte (AGBD; in Mg/ha) und Schätzungen des Standardfehlers der Vorhersage innerhalb jedes geolokalisierten Laser-Fußabdrucks. In dieser Version befinden sich die Granulate in Unterorbiten. Höhemesswerte aus simulierten Wellenformen, die mit…