Facebook
TwitterDataset Card for test-data-generator
This dataset has been created with distilabel.
Dataset Summary
This dataset contains a pipeline.yaml which can be used to reproduce the pipeline that generated it in distilabel using the distilabel CLI: distilabel pipeline run --config "https://huggingface.co/datasets/franciscoflorencio/test-data-generator/raw/main/pipeline.yaml"
or explore the configuration: distilabel pipeline info --config… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/franciscoflorencio/test-data-generator.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Dataset used in the article entitled 'Synthetic Datasets Generator for Testing Information Visualization and Machine Learning Techniques and Tools'. These datasets can be used to test several characteristics in machine learning and data processing algorithms.
Facebook
Twitter
According to our latest research, the global Test Data Generation Tools market size reached USD 1.85 billion in 2024, demonstrating a robust expansion driven by the increasing adoption of automation in software development and quality assurance processes. The market is projected to grow at a CAGR of 13.2% from 2025 to 2033, reaching an estimated USD 5.45 billion by 2033. This growth is primarily fueled by the rising demand for efficient and accurate software testing, the proliferation of DevOps practices, and the need for compliance with stringent data privacy regulations. As organizations worldwide continue to focus on digital transformation and agile development methodologies, the demand for advanced test data generation tools is expected to further accelerate.
One of the core growth factors for the Test Data Generation Tools market is the increasing complexity of software applications and the corresponding need for high-quality, diverse, and realistic test data. As enterprises move toward microservices, cloud-native architectures, and continuous integration/continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipelines, the importance of automated and scalable test data solutions has become paramount. These tools enable development and QA teams to simulate real-world scenarios, uncover hidden defects, and ensure robust performance, thereby reducing time-to-market and enhancing software reliability. The growing adoption of artificial intelligence and machine learning in test data generation is further enhancing the sophistication and effectiveness of these solutions, enabling organizations to address complex data requirements and improve test coverage.
Another significant driver is the increasing regulatory scrutiny surrounding data privacy and security, particularly with regulations such as GDPR, HIPAA, and CCPA. Organizations are under pressure to minimize the use of sensitive production data in testing environments to mitigate risks related to data breaches and non-compliance. Test data generation tools offer anonymization, masking, and synthetic data creation capabilities, allowing companies to generate realistic yet compliant datasets for testing purposes. This not only ensures adherence to regulatory standards but also fosters a culture of data privacy and security within organizations. The heightened focus on data protection is expected to continue fueling the adoption of advanced test data generation solutions across industries such as BFSI, healthcare, and government.
Furthermore, the shift towards agile and DevOps methodologies has transformed the software development lifecycle, emphasizing speed, collaboration, and continuous improvement. In this context, the ability to rapidly generate, refresh, and manage test data has become a critical success factor. Test data generation tools facilitate seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines, automate data provisioning, and support parallel testing, thereby accelerating development cycles and improving overall productivity. With the increasing demand for faster time-to-market and higher software quality, organizations are investing heavily in modern test data management solutions to gain a competitive edge.
From a regional perspective, North America continues to dominate the Test Data Generation Tools market, accounting for the largest share in 2024. This leadership is attributed to the presence of major technology vendors, early adoption of advanced software testing practices, and a mature regulatory environment. However, the Asia Pacific region is expected to witness the highest growth rate during the forecast period, driven by rapid digitalization, expanding IT and telecom sectors, and increasing investments in enterprise software solutions. Europe also represents a significant market, supported by stringent data protection laws and a strong focus on quality assurance. The Middle East & Africa and Latin America regions are gradually catching up, with growing awareness and adoption of test data generation tools among enterprises seeking to enhance their software development capabilities.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This data set contains the result of applying the NIST Statistical Test Suite on accelerometer data processed for random number generator seeding. The NIST Statistical Test Suite can be downloaded from: http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/ST/toolkit/rng/documentation_software.html. The format of the output is explained in http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-22-rev1a/SP800-22rev1a.pdf.
Facebook
Twitter
According to our latest research, the global AI-Generated Test Data market size reached USD 1.12 billion in 2024, driven by the rapid adoption of artificial intelligence across software development and testing environments. The market is exhibiting a robust growth trajectory, registering a CAGR of 28.6% from 2025 to 2033. By 2033, the market is forecasted to achieve a value of USD 10.23 billion, reflecting the increasing reliance on AI-driven solutions for efficient, scalable, and accurate test data generation. This growth is primarily fueled by the rising complexity of software systems, stringent compliance requirements, and the need for enhanced data privacy across industries.
One of the primary growth factors for the AI-Generated Test Data market is the escalating demand for automation in software development lifecycles. As organizations strive to accelerate release cycles and improve software quality, traditional manual test data generation methods are proving inadequate. AI-generated test data solutions offer a compelling alternative by enabling rapid, scalable, and highly accurate data creation, which not only reduces time-to-market but also minimizes human error. This automation is particularly crucial in DevOps and Agile environments, where continuous integration and delivery necessitate fast and reliable testing processes. The ability of AI-driven tools to mimic real-world data scenarios and generate vast datasets on demand is revolutionizing the way enterprises approach software testing and quality assurance.
Another significant driver is the growing emphasis on data privacy and regulatory compliance, especially in sectors such as BFSI, healthcare, and government. With regulations like GDPR, HIPAA, and CCPA imposing strict controls on the use and sharing of real customer data, organizations are increasingly turning to AI-generated synthetic data for testing purposes. This not only ensures compliance but also protects sensitive information from potential breaches during the software development and testing phases. AI-generated test data tools can create anonymized yet realistic datasets that closely replicate production data, allowing organizations to rigorously test their systems without exposing confidential information. This capability is becoming a critical differentiator for vendors in the AI-generated test data market.
The proliferation of complex, data-intensive applications across industries further amplifies the need for sophisticated test data generation solutions. Sectors such as IT and telecommunications, retail and e-commerce, and manufacturing are witnessing a surge in digital transformation initiatives, resulting in intricate software architectures and interconnected systems. AI-generated test data solutions are uniquely positioned to address the challenges posed by these environments, enabling organizations to simulate diverse scenarios, validate system performance, and identify vulnerabilities with unprecedented accuracy. As digital ecosystems continue to evolve, the demand for advanced AI-powered test data generation tools is expected to rise exponentially, driving sustained market growth.
From a regional perspective, North America currently leads the AI-Generated Test Data market, accounting for the largest share in 2024, followed closely by Europe and Asia Pacific. The dominance of North America can be attributed to the high concentration of technology giants, early adoption of AI technologies, and a mature regulatory landscape. Meanwhile, Asia Pacific is emerging as a high-growth region, propelled by rapid digitalization, expanding IT infrastructure, and increasing investments in AI research and development. Europe maintains a steady growth trajectory, bolstered by stringent data privacy regulations and a strong focus on innovation. As global enterprises continue to invest in digital transformation, the regional dynamics of the AI-generated test data market are expected to evolve, with significant opportunities emerging across developing economies.
Facebook
TwitterThe Space-based Imaging Spectroscopy and Thermal pathfindER (SISTER) activity originated in support of the NASA Earth System Observatory's Surface Biology and Geology (SBG) mission to develop prototype workflows with community algorithms and generate prototype data products envisioned for SBG. SISTER focused on developing a data system that is open, portable, scalable, standards-compliant, and reproducible. This collection contains EXPERIMENTAL workflows and sample data products, including (a) the Common Workflow Language (CWL) process file and a Jupyter Notebook that run the entire SISTER workflow capable of generating experimental sample data products spanning terrestrial ecosystems, inland and coastal aquatic ecosystems, and snow, (b) the archived algorithm steps (as OGC Application Packages) used to generate products at each step of the workflow, (c) a small number of experimental sample data products produced by the workflow which are based on the Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer-Classic (AVIRIS or AVIRIS-CL) instrument, and (d) instructions for reproducing the sample products included in this dataset. DISCLAIMER: This collection contains experimental workflows, experimental community algorithms, and experimental sample data products to demonstrate the capabilities of an end-to-end processing system. The experimental sample data products provided have not been fully validated and are not intended for scientific use. The community algorithms provided are placeholders which can be replaced by any user's algorithms for their own science and application interests. These algorithms should not in any capacity be considered the algorithms that will be implemented in the upcoming Surface Biology and Geology mission.
Facebook
TwitterDataset Card for example-preference-dataset
This dataset has been created with distilabel.
Dataset Summary
This dataset contains a pipeline.yaml which can be used to reproduce the pipeline that generated it in distilabel using the distilabel CLI: distilabel pipeline run --config "https://huggingface.co/datasets/sdiazlor/example-preference-dataset/raw/main/pipeline.yaml"
or explore the configuration: distilabel pipeline info --config… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/distilabel-internal-testing/example-generate-preference-dataset.
Facebook
TwitterAI Training Data | Annotated Checkout Flows for Retail, Restaurant, and Marketplace Websites Overview
Unlock the next generation of agentic commerce and automated shopping experiences with this comprehensive dataset of meticulously annotated checkout flows, sourced directly from leading retail, restaurant, and marketplace websites. Designed for developers, researchers, and AI labs building large language models (LLMs) and agentic systems capable of online purchasing, this dataset captures the real-world complexity of digital transactions—from cart initiation to final payment.
Key Features
Breadth of Coverage: Over 10,000 unique checkout journeys across hundreds of top e-commerce, food delivery, and service platforms, including but not limited to Walmart, Target, Kroger, Whole Foods, Uber Eats, Instacart, Shopify-powered sites, and more.
Actionable Annotation: Every flow is broken down into granular, step-by-step actions, complete with timestamped events, UI context, form field details, validation logic, and response feedback. Each step includes:
Page state (URL, DOM snapshot, and metadata)
User actions (clicks, taps, text input, dropdown selection, checkbox/radio interactions)
System responses (AJAX calls, error/success messages, cart/price updates)
Authentication and account linking steps where applicable
Payment entry (card, wallet, alternative methods)
Order review and confirmation
Multi-Vertical, Real-World Data: Flows sourced from a wide variety of verticals and real consumer environments, not just demo stores or test accounts. Includes complex cases such as multi-item carts, promo codes, loyalty integration, and split payments.
Structured for Machine Learning: Delivered in standard formats (JSONL, CSV, or your preferred schema), with every event mapped to action types, page features, and expected outcomes. Optional HAR files and raw network request logs provide an extra layer of technical fidelity for action modeling and RLHF pipelines.
Rich Context for LLMs and Agents: Every annotation includes both human-readable and model-consumable descriptions:
“What the user did” (natural language)
“What the system did in response”
“What a successful action should look like”
Error/edge case coverage (invalid forms, OOS, address/payment errors)
Privacy-Safe & Compliant: All flows are depersonalized and scrubbed of PII. Sensitive fields (like credit card numbers, user addresses, and login credentials) are replaced with realistic but synthetic data, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations.
Each flow tracks the user journey from cart to payment to confirmation, including:
Adding/removing items
Applying coupons or promo codes
Selecting shipping/delivery options
Account creation, login, or guest checkout
Inputting payment details (card, wallet, Buy Now Pay Later)
Handling validation errors or OOS scenarios
Order review and final placement
Confirmation page capture (including order summary details)
Why This Dataset?
Building LLMs, agentic shopping bots, or e-commerce automation tools demands more than just page screenshots or API logs. You need deeply contextualized, action-oriented data that reflects how real users interact with the complex, ever-changing UIs of digital commerce. Our dataset uniquely captures:
The full intent-action-outcome loop
Dynamic UI changes, modals, validation, and error handling
Nuances of cart modification, bundle pricing, delivery constraints, and multi-vendor checkouts
Mobile vs. desktop variations
Diverse merchant tech stacks (custom, Shopify, Magento, BigCommerce, native apps, etc.)
Use Cases
LLM Fine-Tuning: Teach models to reason through step-by-step transaction flows, infer next-best-actions, and generate robust, context-sensitive prompts for real-world ordering.
Agentic Shopping Bots: Train agents to navigate web/mobile checkouts autonomously, handle edge cases, and complete real purchases on behalf of users.
Action Model & RLHF Training: Provide reinforcement learning pipelines with ground truth “what happens if I do X?” data across hundreds of real merchants.
UI/UX Research & Synthetic User Studies: Identify friction points, bottlenecks, and drop-offs in modern checkout design by replaying flows and testing interventions.
Automated QA & Regression Testing: Use realistic flows as test cases for new features or third-party integrations.
What’s Included
10,000+ annotated checkout flows (retail, restaurant, marketplace)
Step-by-step event logs with metadata, DOM, and network context
Natural language explanations for each step and transition
All flows are depersonalized and privacy-compliant
Example scripts for ingesting, parsing, and analyzing the dataset
Flexible licensing for research or commercial use
Sample Categories Covered
Grocery delivery (Instacart, Walmart, Kroger, Target, etc.)
Restaurant takeout/delivery (Ub...
Facebook
TwitterApache License, v2.0https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
License information was derived automatically
This training data was generated using GPT-4o as part of the 'Drawing with LLM' competition (https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/drawing-with-llms). It can be used to fine-tune small language models for the competition or serve as an augmentation dataset alongside other data sources.
The dataset is generated in two steps using the GPT-4o model. - In the first step, topic descriptions relevant to the competition are generated using a specific prompt. By running this prompt multiple times, over 3,000 descriptions were collected.
prompt=f""" I am participating in an SVG code generation competition.
The competition involves generating SVG images based on short textual descriptions of everyday objects and scenes, spanning a wide range of categories. The key guidelines are as follows:
- Descriptions are generic and do not contain brand names, trademarks, or personal names.
- No descriptions include people, even in generic terms.
- Descriptions are concise—each is no more than 200 characters, with an average length of about 50 characters.
- Categories cover various domains, with some overlap between public and private test sets.
To train a small LLM model, I am preparing a synthetic dataset. Could you generate 100 unique topics aligned with the competition style?
Requirements:
- Each topic should range between **20 and 200 characters**, with an **average around 60 characters**.
- Ensure **diversity and creativity** across topics.
- **50% of the topics** should come from the categories of **landscapes**, **abstract art**, and **fashion**.
- Avoid duplication or overly similar phrasing.
Example topics:
a purple forest at dusk, gray wool coat with a faux fur collar, a lighthouse overlooking the ocean, burgundy corduroy, pants with patch pockets and silver buttons, orange corduroy overalls, a purple silk scarf with tassel trim, a green lagoon under a cloudy sky, crimson rectangles forming a chaotic grid, purple pyramids spiraling around a bronze cone, magenta trapezoids layered on a translucent silver sheet, a snowy plain, black and white checkered pants, a starlit night over snow-covered peaks, khaki triangles and azure crescents, a maroon dodecahedron interwoven with teal threads.
Please return the 100 topics in csv format.
"""
prompt = f"""
Generate SVG code to visually represent the following text description, while respecting the given constraints.
Allowed Elements: `svg`, `path`, `circle`, `rect`, `ellipse`, `line`, `polyline`, `polygon`, `g`, `linearGradient`, `radialGradient`, `stop`, `defs`
Allowed Attributes: `viewBox`, `width`, `height`, `fill`, `stroke`, `stroke-width`, `d`, `cx`, `cy`, `r`, `x`, `y`, `rx`, `ry`, `x1`, `y1`, `x2`, `y2`, `points`, `transform`, `opacity`
Please ensure that the generated SVG code is well-formed, valid, and strictly adheres to these constraints.
Focus on a clear and concise representation of the input description within the given limitations.
Always give the complete SVG code with nothing omitted. Never use an ellipsis.
The code is scored based on similarity to the description, Visual question anwering and aesthetic components.
Please generate a detailed svg code accordingly.
input description: {text}
"""
The raw SVG output is then cleaned and sanitized using a competition-specific sanitization class. After that, the cleaned SVG is scored using the SigLIP model to evaluate text-to-SVG similarity. Only SVGs with a score above 0.5 are included in the dataset. On average, out of three SVG generations, only one meets the quality threshold after the cleaning, sanitization, and scoring process.
A dataset with ~50,000 samples for SVG code generation is publicly available at: https://huggingface.co/datasets/vinoku89/svg-code-generation
Facebook
Twitterhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
This dataset was created by g-dragon
Released under CC0: Public Domain
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
BackgroundClinical data is instrumental to medical research, machine learning (ML) model development, and advancing surgical care, but access is often constrained by privacy regulations and missing data. Synthetic data offers a promising solution to preserve privacy while enabling broader data access. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) provide an opportunity to generate synthetic data with reduced reliance on domain expertise, computational resources, and pre-training.ObjectiveThis study aims to assess the feasibility of generating realistic tabular clinical data with OpenAI’s GPT-4o using zero-shot prompting, and evaluate the fidelity of LLM-generated data by comparing its statistical properties to the Vital Signs DataBase (VitalDB), a real-world open-source perioperative dataset.MethodsIn Phase 1, GPT-4o was prompted to generate a dataset with qualitative descriptions of 13 clinical parameters. The resultant data was assessed for general errors, plausibility of outputs, and cross-verification of related parameters. In Phase 2, GPT-4o was prompted to generate a dataset using descriptive statistics of the VitalDB dataset. Fidelity was assessed using two-sample t-tests, two-sample proportion tests, and 95% confidence interval (CI) overlap.ResultsIn Phase 1, GPT-4o generated a complete and structured dataset comprising 6,166 case files. The dataset was plausible in range and correctly calculated body mass index for all case files based on respective heights and weights. Statistical comparison between the LLM-generated datasets and VitalDB revealed that Phase 2 data achieved significant fidelity. Phase 2 data demonstrated statistical similarity in 12/13 (92.31%) parameters, whereby no statistically significant differences were observed in 6/6 (100.0%) categorical/binary and 6/7 (85.71%) continuous parameters. Overlap of 95% CIs were observed in 6/7 (85.71%) continuous parameters.ConclusionZero-shot prompting with GPT-4o can generate realistic tabular synthetic datasets, which can replicate key statistical properties of real-world perioperative data. This study highlights the potential of LLMs as a novel and accessible modality for synthetic data generation, which may address critical barriers in clinical data access and eliminate the need for technical expertise, extensive computational resources, and pre-training. Further research is warranted to enhance fidelity and investigate the use of LLMs to amplify and augment datasets, preserve multivariate relationships, and train robust ML models.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policy
According to our latest research, the global Test Data Generation AI market size reached USD 1.29 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow at a robust CAGR of 24.7% from 2025 to 2033. By the end of the forecast period in 2033, the market is anticipated to attain a value of USD 10.1 billion. This substantial growth is primarily driven by the increasing complexity of software systems, the rising need for high-quality, compliant test data, and the rapid adoption of AI-driven automation across diverse industries.
The accelerating digital transformation across sectors such as BFSI, healthcare, and retail is one of the core growth factors propelling the Test Data Generation AI market. Organizations are under mounting pressure to deliver software faster, with higher quality and reduced risk, especially as business models become more data-driven and customer expectations for seamless digital experiences intensify. AI-powered test data generation tools are proving indispensable by automating the creation of realistic, diverse, and compliant test datasets, thereby enabling faster and more reliable software testing cycles. Furthermore, the proliferation of agile and DevOps practices is amplifying the demand for continuous testing environments, where the ability to generate synthetic test data on demand is a critical enabler of speed and innovation.
Another significant driver is the escalating emphasis on data privacy, security, and regulatory compliance. With stringent regulations such as GDPR, HIPAA, and CCPA in place, enterprises are compelled to ensure that non-production environments do not expose sensitive information. Test Data Generation AI solutions excel at creating anonymized or masked data sets that maintain the statistical properties of production data while eliminating privacy risks. This capability not only addresses compliance mandates but also empowers organizations to safely test new features, integrations, and applications without compromising user confidentiality. The growing awareness of these compliance imperatives is expected to further accelerate the adoption of AI-driven test data generation tools across regulated industries.
The ongoing evolution of AI and machine learning technologies is also enhancing the capabilities and appeal of Test Data Generation AI solutions. Advanced algorithms can now analyze complex data models, understand interdependencies, and generate highly realistic test data that mirrors production environments. This sophistication enables organizations to uncover hidden defects, improve test coverage, and simulate edge cases that would be challenging to create manually. As AI models continue to mature, the accuracy, scalability, and adaptability of test data generation platforms are expected to reach new heights, making them a strategic asset for enterprises striving for digital excellence and operational resilience.
Regionally, North America continues to dominate the Test Data Generation AI market, accounting for the largest revenue share in 2024, followed closely by Europe and Asia Pacific. The United States, in particular, is at the forefront due to its advanced technology ecosystem, early adoption of AI solutions, and the presence of leading software and cloud service providers. However, Asia Pacific is emerging as a high-growth region, fueled by rapid digitalization, expanding IT infrastructure, and increasing investments in AI research and development. Europe remains a key market, underpinned by strong regulatory frameworks and a growing focus on data privacy. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa, while still nascent, are exhibiting steady growth as enterprises in these regions recognize the value of AI-driven test data solutions for competitive differentiation and compliance assurance.
The Test Data Generation AI market by component is segmented into Software and Services, each playing a pivotal role in driving the overall market expansion. The software segment commands the lion’s share of the market, as organizations increasingly prioritize automation and scalability in their test data generation processes. AI-powered software platforms offer a suite of features, including data profiling, masking, subsetting, and synthetic data creation, which are integral to modern DevOps and continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines. These platforms are designed to seamlessly integrate with existing testing tools, datab
Facebook
TwitterCreating a robust employee dataset for data analysis and visualization involves several key fields that capture different aspects of an employee's information. Here's a list of fields you might consider including: Employee ID: A unique identifier for each employee. Name: First name and last name of the employee. Gender: Male, female, non-binary, etc. Date of Birth: Birthdate of the employee. Email Address: Contact email of the employee. Phone Number: Contact number of the employee. Address: Home or work address of the employee. Department: The department the employee belongs to (e.g., HR, Marketing, Engineering, etc.). Job Title: The specific job title of the employee. Manager ID: ID of the employee's manager. Hire Date: Date when the employee was hired. Salary: Employee's salary or compensation. Employment Status: Full-time, part-time, contractor, etc. Employee Type: Regular, temporary, contract, etc. Education Level: Highest level of education attained by the employee. Certifications: Any relevant certifications the employee holds. Skills: Specific skills or expertise possessed by the employee. Performance Ratings: Ratings or evaluations of employee performance. Work Experience: Previous work experience of the employee. Benefits Enrollment: Information on benefits chosen by the employee (e.g., healthcare plan, retirement plan, etc.). Work Location: Physical location where the employee works. Work Hours: Regular working hours or shifts of the employee. Employee Status: Active, on leave, terminated, etc. Emergency Contact: Contact information of the employee's emergency contact person. Employee Satisfaction Survey Responses: Data from employee satisfaction surveys, if applicable.
Code Url: https://github.com/intellisenseCodez/faker-data-generator
Facebook
Twitterhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policy
According to our latest research, the global Sandbox Data Generator market size reached USD 1.41 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow at a robust CAGR of 11.2% from 2025 to 2033. By the end of the forecast period, the market is expected to attain a value of USD 3.71 billion by 2033. This remarkable growth is primarily driven by the increasing demand for secure, reliable, and scalable test data generation solutions across industries such as BFSI, healthcare, and IT and telecommunications, as organizations strive to enhance their data privacy and compliance capabilities in an era of heightened regulatory scrutiny and digital transformation.
A major growth factor propelling the Sandbox Data Generator market is the intensifying focus on data privacy and regulatory compliance across global enterprises. With stringent regulations such as GDPR, CCPA, and HIPAA becoming the norm, organizations are under immense pressure to ensure that non-production environments do not expose sensitive information. Sandbox data generators, which enable the creation of realistic yet anonymized or masked data sets for testing and development, are increasingly being adopted to address these compliance challenges. Furthermore, the rise of DevOps and agile methodologies has led to a surge in demand for efficient test data management, as businesses seek to accelerate software development cycles without compromising on data security. The integration of advanced data masking, subsetting, and anonymization features within sandbox data generation platforms is therefore a critical enabler for organizations aiming to achieve both rapid innovation and regulatory adherence.
Another significant driver for the Sandbox Data Generator market is the exponential growth of digital transformation initiatives across various industry verticals. As enterprises migrate to cloud-based infrastructures and adopt advanced technologies such as AI, machine learning, and big data analytics, the need for high-quality, production-like test data has never been more acute. Sandbox data generators play a pivotal role in supporting these digital initiatives by supplying synthetic yet realistic datasets that facilitate robust testing, model training, and system validation. This, in turn, helps organizations minimize the risks associated with deploying new applications or features, while reducing the time and costs associated with traditional data provisioning methods. The rise of microservices architecture and API-driven development further amplifies the necessity for dynamic, scalable, and automated test data generation solutions.
Additionally, the proliferation of data breaches and cyber threats has underscored the importance of robust data protection strategies, further fueling the adoption of sandbox data generators. Enterprises are increasingly recognizing that using real production data in test environments can expose them to significant security vulnerabilities and compliance risks. By leveraging sandbox data generators, organizations can create safe, de-identified datasets that maintain the statistical properties of real data, enabling comprehensive testing without jeopardizing sensitive information. This trend is particularly pronounced in sectors such as BFSI and healthcare, where data sensitivity and compliance requirements are paramount. As a result, vendors are investing heavily in enhancing the security, scalability, and automation capabilities of their sandbox data generation solutions to cater to the evolving needs of these high-stakes industries.
From a regional perspective, North America is anticipated to maintain its dominance in the global Sandbox Data Generator market, driven by the presence of leading technology providers, a mature regulatory landscape, and high digital adoption rates among enterprises. However, the Asia Pacific region is poised for the fastest growth, fueled by rapid digitalization, increasing investments in IT infrastructure, and growing awareness of data privacy and compliance issues. Europe also represents a significant market, supported by stringent data protection regulations and a strong focus on innovation across key industries. As organizations worldwide continue to prioritize data security and agile development, the demand for advanced sandbox data generation solutions is expected to witness sustained growth across all major regions.
The Sandbox Data Genera
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.technavio.com/content/privacy-noticehttps://www.technavio.com/content/privacy-notice
Generator Market In Data Centers Size 2025-2029
The generator market in data centers size is valued to increase USD 4.63 billion, at a CAGR of 8.6% from 2024 to 2029. Increasing investments in data centers will drive the generator market in data centers.
Major Market Trends & Insights
Europe dominated the market and accounted for a 33% growth during the forecast period.
By Type - Diesel segment was valued at USD 4.88 billion in 2023
By Capacity - Less than 1MW segment accounted for the largest market revenue share in 2023
Market Size & Forecast
Market Opportunities: USD 143.59 million
Market Future Opportunities: USD 4634.70 million
CAGR : 8.6%
Europe: Largest market in 2023
Market Summary
The market is a dynamic and evolving sector, driven by the increasing demand for uninterrupted power supply and the growing reliance on data centers for digital transformation. Core technologies, such as fuel cells and lithium-ion batteries, are gaining traction due to their efficiency and environmental benefits. Meanwhile, applications like backup power and prime power continue to dominate the market. Service types, including generator rental and maintenance, are essential for ensuring the reliability and longevity of these systems. Regulations, such as emissions standards, are shaping the market landscape, with an increasing focus on reducing carbon emissions. Looking forward, the next five years are expected to bring significant growth, as investments in data centers continue to surge. For instance, according to recent reports, the data center market is projected to reach a compound annual growth rate of 12% by 2026. Furthermore, the adoption of next-generation power monitoring and management software is on the rise, enabling more efficient energy management and reducing the overall carbon footprint of data centers. Related markets such as the renewable energy sector and energy storage systems are also experiencing significant growth, offering opportunities for collaboration and innovation in the market.
What will be the Size of the Generator Market In Data Centers during the forecast period?
Get Key Insights on Market Forecast (PDF) Request Free Sample
How is the Generator In Data Centers Market Segmented and what are the key trends of market segmentation?
The generator in data centers industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD million' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments. TypeDieselGasCapacityLess than 1MW1MW-2MWMore than 2MWVariantTier IIITier IVTier I and IIGeographyNorth AmericaUSCanadaEuropeFranceGermanyItalyThe NetherlandsUKAPACChinaIndiaJapanRest of World (ROW)
By Type Insights
The diesel segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.
In the dynamic and evolving data center market, diesel generators play a pivotal role in ensuring high-performance and reliability during power fluctuations or transient scenarios. With a wide range of capacity offerings, these generators are the preferred choice for large-scale data center infrastructure due to their cost-effectiveness and safety features. The diesel generator system encompasses various components, such as the diesel engine, generating unit, fuel storage supply, and electrical switchgear. According to recent studies, approximately 65% of data centers rely on diesel generators for backup power. Furthermore, the market for diesel generators in data centers is projected to expand by 25% in the next five years, as more businesses invest in critical power systems to maintain high availability and minimize downtime. Power quality monitoring, generator commissioning, and load balancing are essential aspects of generator maintenance schedules. Fuel cell technology and energy storage solutions are increasingly integrated into these systems to enhance efficiency and reduce noise levels. Power factor correction and generator control systems ensure optimal performance and minimize environmental impact. Environmental impact assessment, power usage effectiveness, and diesel generator efficiency are crucial metrics for data center infrastructure. Predictive maintenance models and fault-tolerant systems enable proactive maintenance and reduce downtime. Generator automation, backup power redundancy, and critical power systems are integral components of high availability systems. The generator installation standards mandate strict adherence to safety regulations and emissions guidelines. Generator exhaust emissions are continuously monitored and reduced through advanced technologies. Remote generator monitoring and paralleling systems enable seamless integration into the power distribution units. In summary, diesel generators are a vital component of data center infrastructure, pr
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policy
The Test Data Generation Tools market is poised for significant expansion, projected to reach an estimated USD 1.5 billion in 2025 and exhibit a robust Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of approximately 15% through 2033. This growth is primarily fueled by the escalating complexity of software applications, the increasing demand for agile development methodologies, and the critical need for comprehensive and realistic test data to ensure application quality and performance. Enterprises across all sizes, from large corporations to Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs), are recognizing the indispensable role of effective test data management in mitigating risks, accelerating time-to-market, and enhancing user experience. The drive for cost optimization and regulatory compliance further propels the adoption of advanced test data generation solutions, as manual data creation is often time-consuming, error-prone, and unsustainable in today's fast-paced development cycles. The market is witnessing a paradigm shift towards intelligent and automated data generation, moving beyond basic random or pathwise techniques to more sophisticated goal-oriented and AI-driven approaches that can generate highly relevant and production-like data. The market landscape is characterized by a dynamic interplay of established technology giants and specialized players, all vying for market share by offering innovative features and tailored solutions. Prominent companies like IBM, Informatica, Microsoft, and Broadcom are leveraging their extensive portfolios and cloud infrastructure to provide integrated data management and testing solutions. Simultaneously, specialized vendors such as DATPROF, Delphix Corporation, and Solix Technologies are carving out niches by focusing on advanced synthetic data generation, data masking, and data subsetting capabilities. The evolution of cloud-native architectures and microservices has created a new set of challenges and opportunities, with a growing emphasis on generating diverse and high-volume test data for distributed systems. Asia Pacific, particularly China and India, is emerging as a significant growth region due to the burgeoning IT sector and increasing investments in digital transformation initiatives. North America and Europe continue to be mature markets, driven by strong R&D investments and a high level of digital adoption. The market's trajectory indicates a sustained upward trend, driven by the continuous pursuit of software excellence and the critical need for robust testing strategies. This report provides an in-depth analysis of the global Test Data Generation Tools market, examining its evolution, current landscape, and future trajectory from 2019 to 2033. The Base Year for analysis is 2025, with the Estimated Year also being 2025, and the Forecast Period extending from 2025 to 2033. The Historical Period covered is 2019-2024. We delve into the critical aspects of this rapidly growing industry, offering insights into market dynamics, key players, emerging trends, and growth opportunities. The market is projected to witness substantial growth, with an estimated value reaching several million by the end of the forecast period.
Facebook
TwitterCompany Datasets for valuable business insights!
Discover new business prospects, identify investment opportunities, track competitor performance, and streamline your sales efforts with comprehensive Company Datasets.
These datasets are sourced from top industry providers, ensuring you have access to high-quality information:
We provide fresh and ready-to-use company data, eliminating the need for complex scraping and parsing. Our data includes crucial details such as:
You can choose your preferred data delivery method, including various storage options, delivery frequency, and input/output formats.
Receive datasets in CSV, JSON, and other formats, with storage options like AWS S3 and Google Cloud Storage. Opt for one-time, monthly, quarterly, or bi-annual data delivery.
With Oxylabs Datasets, you can count on:
Pricing Options:
Standard Datasets: choose from various ready-to-use datasets with standardized data schemas, priced from $1,000/month.
Custom Datasets: Tailor datasets from any public web domain to your unique business needs. Contact our sales team for custom pricing.
Experience a seamless journey with Oxylabs:
Unlock the power of data with Oxylabs' Company Datasets and supercharge your business insights today!
Facebook
Twitterhttps://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.htmlhttps://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.html
Social networks are tied to population dynamics; interactions are driven by population density and demographic structure, while social relationships can be key determinants of survival and reproductive success. However, difficulties integrating models used in demography and network analysis have limited research at this interface. We introduce the R package genNetDem for simulating integrated network-demographic datasets. It can be used to create longitudinal social networks and/or capture-recapture datasets with known properties. It incorporates the ability to generate populations and their social networks, generate grouping events using these networks, simulate social network effects on individual survival, and flexibly sample these longitudinal datasets of social associations. By generating co-capture data with known statistical relationships it provides functionality for methodological research. We demonstrate its use with case studies testing how imputation and sampling design influence the success of adding network traits to conventional Cormack-Jolly-Seber (CJS) models. We show that incorporating social network effects in CJS models generates qualitatively accurate results, but with downward-biased parameter estimates when network position influences survival. Biases are greater when fewer interactions are sampled or fewer individuals are observed in each interaction. While our results indicate the potential of incorporating social effects within demographic models, they show that imputing missing network measures alone is insufficient to accurately estimate social effects on survival, pointing to the importance of incorporating network imputation approaches. genNetDem provides a flexible tool to aid these methodological advancements and help researchers test other sampling considerations in social network studies. Methods The dataset and code stored here is for Case Studies 1 and 2 in the paper. Datsets were generated using simulations in R. Here we provide 1) the R code used for the simulations; 2) the simulation outputs (as .RDS files); and 3) the R code to analyse simulation outputs and generate the tables and figures in the paper.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Introduction
This repository hosts the Testing Roads for Autonomous VEhicLes (TRAVEL) dataset. TRAVEL is an extensive collection of virtual roads that have been used for testing lane assist/keeping systems (i.e., driving agents) and data from their execution in state of the art, physically accurate driving simulator, called BeamNG.tech. Virtual roads consist of sequences of road points interpolated using Cubic splines.
Along with the data, this repository contains instructions on how to install the tooling necessary to generate new data (i.e., test cases) and analyze them in the context of test regression. We focus on test selection and test prioritization, given their importance for developing high-quality software following the DevOps paradigms.
This dataset builds on top of our previous work in this area, including work on
test generation (e.g., AsFault, DeepJanus, and DeepHyperion) and the SBST CPS tool competition (SBST2021),
test selection: SDC-Scissor and related tool
test prioritization: automated test cases prioritization work for SDCs.
Dataset Overview
The TRAVEL dataset is available under the data folder and is organized as a set of experiments folders. Each of these folders is generated by running the test-generator (see below) and contains the configuration used for generating the data (experiment_description.csv), various statistics on generated tests (generation_stats.csv) and found faults (oob_stats.csv). Additionally, the folders contain the raw test cases generated and executed during each experiment (test..json).
The following sections describe what each of those files contains.
Experiment Description
The experiment_description.csv contains the settings used to generate the data, including:
Time budget. The overall generation budget in hours. This budget includes both the time to generate and execute the tests as driving simulations.
The size of the map. The size of the squared map defines the boundaries inside which the virtual roads develop in meters.
The test subject. The driving agent that implements the lane-keeping system under test. The TRAVEL dataset contains data generated testing the BeamNG.AI and the end-to-end Dave2 systems.
The test generator. The algorithm that generated the test cases. The TRAVEL dataset contains data obtained using various algorithms, ranging from naive and advanced random generators to complex evolutionary algorithms, for generating tests.
The speed limit. The maximum speed at which the driving agent under test can travel.
Out of Bound (OOB) tolerance. The test cases' oracle that defines the tolerable amount of the ego-car that can lie outside the lane boundaries. This parameter ranges between 0.0 and 1.0. In the former case, a test failure triggers as soon as any part of the ego-vehicle goes out of the lane boundary; in the latter case, a test failure triggers only if the entire body of the ego-car falls outside the lane.
Experiment Statistics
The generation_stats.csv contains statistics about the test generation, including:
Total number of generated tests. The number of tests generated during an experiment. This number is broken down into the number of valid tests and invalid tests. Valid tests contain virtual roads that do not self-intersect and contain turns that are not too sharp.
Test outcome. The test outcome contains the number of passed tests, failed tests, and test in error. Passed and failed tests are defined by the OOB Tolerance and an additional (implicit) oracle that checks whether the ego-car is moving or standing. Tests that did not pass because of other errors (e.g., the simulator crashed) are reported in a separated category.
The TRAVEL dataset also contains statistics about the failed tests, including the overall number of failed tests (total oob) and its breakdown into OOB that happened while driving left or right. Further statistics about the diversity (i.e., sparseness) of the failures are also reported.
Test Cases and Executions
Each test..json contains information about a test case and, if the test case is valid, the data observed during its execution as driving simulation.
The data about the test case definition include:
The road points. The list of points in a 2D space that identifies the center of the virtual road, and their interpolation using cubic splines (interpolated_points)
The test ID. The unique identifier of the test in the experiment.
Validity flag and explanation. A flag that indicates whether the test is valid or not, and a brief message describing why the test is not considered valid (e.g., the road contains sharp turns or the road self intersects)
The test data are organized according to the following JSON Schema and can be interpreted as RoadTest objects provided by the tests_generation.py module.
{ "type": "object", "properties": { "id": { "type": "integer" }, "is_valid": { "type": "boolean" }, "validation_message": { "type": "string" }, "road_points": { §\label{line:road-points}§ "type": "array", "items": { "$ref": "schemas/pair" }, }, "interpolated_points": { §\label{line:interpolated-points}§ "type": "array", "items": { "$ref": "schemas/pair" }, }, "test_outcome": { "type": "string" }, §\label{line:test-outcome}§ "description": { "type": "string" }, "execution_data": { "type": "array", "items": { "$ref" : "schemas/simulationdata" } } }, "required": [ "id", "is_valid", "validation_message", "road_points", "interpolated_points" ] }
Finally, the execution data contain a list of timestamped state information recorded by the driving simulation. State information is collected at constant frequency and includes absolute position, rotation, and velocity of the ego-car, its speed in Km/h, and control inputs from the driving agent (steering, throttle, and braking). Additionally, execution data contain OOB-related data, such as the lateral distance between the car and the lane center and the OOB percentage (i.e., how much the car is outside the lane).
The simulation data adhere to the following (simplified) JSON Schema and can be interpreted as Python objects using the simulation_data.py module.
{ "$id": "schemas/simulationdata", "type": "object", "properties": { "timer" : { "type": "number" }, "pos" : { "type": "array", "items":{ "$ref" : "schemas/triple" } } "vel" : { "type": "array", "items":{ "$ref" : "schemas/triple" } } "vel_kmh" : { "type": "number" }, "steering" : { "type": "number" }, "brake" : { "type": "number" }, "throttle" : { "type": "number" }, "is_oob" : { "type": "number" }, "oob_percentage" : { "type": "number" } §\label{line:oob-percentage}§ }, "required": [ "timer", "pos", "vel", "vel_kmh", "steering", "brake", "throttle", "is_oob", "oob_percentage" ] }
Dataset Content
The TRAVEL dataset is a lively initiative so the content of the dataset is subject to change. Currently, the dataset contains the data collected during the SBST CPS tool competition, and data collected in the context of our recent work on test selection (SDC-Scissor work and tool) and test prioritization (automated test cases prioritization work for SDCs).
SBST CPS Tool Competition Data
The data collected during the SBST CPS tool competition are stored inside data/competition.tar.gz. The file contains the test cases generated by Deeper, Frenetic, AdaFrenetic, and Swat, the open-source test generators submitted to the competition and executed against BeamNG.AI with an aggression factor of 0.7 (i.e., conservative driver).
Name
Map Size (m x m)
Max Speed (Km/h)
Budget (h)
OOB Tolerance (%)
Test Subject
DEFAULT
200 × 200
120
5 (real time)
0.95
BeamNG.AI - 0.7
SBST
200 × 200
70
2 (real time)
0.5
BeamNG.AI - 0.7
Specifically, the TRAVEL dataset contains 8 repetitions for each of the above configurations for each test generator totaling 64 experiments.
SDC Scissor
With SDC-Scissor we collected data based on the Frenetic test generator. The data is stored inside data/sdc-scissor.tar.gz. The following table summarizes the used parameters.
Name
Map Size (m x m)
Max Speed (Km/h)
Budget (h)
OOB Tolerance (%)
Test Subject
SDC-SCISSOR
200 × 200
120
16 (real time)
0.5
BeamNG.AI - 1.5
The dataset contains 9 experiments with the above configuration. For generating your own data with SDC-Scissor follow the instructions in its repository.
Dataset Statistics
Here is an overview of the TRAVEL dataset: generated tests, executed tests, and faults found by all the test generators grouped by experiment configuration. Some 25,845 test cases are generated by running 4 test generators 8 times in 2 configurations using the SBST CPS Tool Competition code pipeline (SBST in the table). We ran the test generators for 5 hours, allowing the ego-car a generous speed limit (120 Km/h) and defining a high OOB tolerance (i.e., 0.95), and we also ran the test generators using a smaller generation budget (i.e., 2 hours) and speed limit (i.e., 70 Km/h) while setting the OOB tolerance to a lower value (i.e., 0.85). We also collected some 5, 971 additional tests with SDC-Scissor (SDC-Scissor in the table) by running it 9 times for 16 hours using Frenetic as a test generator and defining a more realistic OOB tolerance (i.e., 0.50).
Generating new Data
Generating new data, i.e., test cases, can be done using the SBST CPS Tool Competition pipeline and the driving simulator BeamNG.tech.
Extensive instructions on how to install both software are reported inside the SBST CPS Tool Competition pipeline Documentation;
Facebook
TwitterWe developed habitat suitability models for invasive plant species selected by Department of Interior land management agencies. We applied the modeling workflow developed in Young et al. 2020 to species not included in the original case studies. Our methodology balanced trade-offs between developing highly customized models for a few species versus fitting non-specific and generic models for numerous species. We developed a national library of environmental variables known to physiologically limit plant distributions (Engelstad et al. 2022 Table S1: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263056) and relied on human input based on natural history knowledge to further narrow the variable set for each species before developing habitat suitability models. We developed models using five algorithms with VisTrails: Software for Assisted Habitat Modeling [SAHM 2.1.2]. We accounted for uncertainty related to sampling bias by using two alternative sources of background samples, and constructed model ensembles using the 10 models for each species (five algorithms by two background methods) for three different thresholds (conservative to targeted). The mergedDataset_regionalization.csv file contains predictor values associated with pixels underlying each presence and background point. The testStripPoints_regionalization.csv file contains the locations of the modeled species occurring in the different geographic test strips.
Facebook
TwitterDataset Card for test-data-generator
This dataset has been created with distilabel.
Dataset Summary
This dataset contains a pipeline.yaml which can be used to reproduce the pipeline that generated it in distilabel using the distilabel CLI: distilabel pipeline run --config "https://huggingface.co/datasets/franciscoflorencio/test-data-generator/raw/main/pipeline.yaml"
or explore the configuration: distilabel pipeline info --config… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/franciscoflorencio/test-data-generator.