The Software Geographic Information Systems (GIS) market is thriving, with a market size of XXX million in 2025 and a CAGR of XX% projected for the period of 2025-2033. Digitalization, increasing demand for spatial data and analytics, and advancements in cloud computing and data storage are the primary drivers of this growth. Furthermore, the incorporation of GIS in various sectors such as disaster management, land information management, and infrastructure management is contributing to the market's expansion. Key trends shaping the market include the rise of mobile and cloud-based GIS, the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning for enhanced data analysis, and the adoption of open-source GIS platforms. Despite these growth factors, challenges such as data privacy concerns, a lack of skilled GIS professionals, and budgetary constraints for implementing GIS solutions may hinder market expansion. Key players in the market include Pasco Corporation, Ubisense Group, Beijing SuperMap Software, Hexagon, and Schneider Electric, among others. North America holds a significant market share, followed by Europe and Asia Pacific.

The Geographic Information System (GIS) market is experiencing robust growth, projected to reach $5.15 billion in 2025 and exhibiting a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 20.55% from 2025 to 2033. This expansion is fueled by several key drivers. Increasing urbanization and the need for efficient urban planning are creating significant demand for GIS solutions. Furthermore, advancements in technology, particularly in cloud computing and artificial intelligence (AI), are enhancing GIS capabilities, leading to wider adoption across various sectors. The integration of GIS with other technologies like IoT (Internet of Things) and big data analytics is enabling more sophisticated spatial analysis and decision-making. Industries like transportation, utilities, and agriculture are leveraging GIS for improved asset management, infrastructure planning, and precision farming. The market is segmented by component (software, data, services) and deployment (on-premise, cloud), with the cloud-based deployment model experiencing faster growth due to its scalability and cost-effectiveness. The competitive landscape is characterized by a mix of established players like Esri, Autodesk, and Trimble, and emerging technology providers, creating a dynamic market with significant innovation. However, factors like high initial investment costs and the need for skilled professionals to implement and manage GIS systems pose challenges to market growth. Despite these restraints, the long-term outlook for the GIS market remains positive. The increasing availability of geospatial data, coupled with declining hardware costs and improvements in user interfaces, is making GIS technology more accessible to a wider range of users. The integration of GIS into mobile applications and the rise of location-based services further broaden the market's potential. Government initiatives promoting smart cities and digital infrastructure development are also contributing to market growth. The North American region, particularly the United States, currently holds a significant market share due to early adoption and a robust technology ecosystem. However, other regions, especially in Asia-Pacific and Europe, are experiencing rapid growth, driven by increasing infrastructure investments and the adoption of advanced technologies. Future growth will be influenced by continued technological innovation, the availability of skilled workforce, and government regulations related to geospatial data management.

Needing to answer the question of “where” sat at the forefront of everyone’s mind, and using a geographic information system (GIS) for real-time surveillance transformed possibly overwhelming data into location intelligence that provided agencies and civic leaders with valuable insights.This book highlights best practices, key GIS capabilities, and lessons learned during the COVID-19 response that can help communities prepare for the next crisis.GIS has empowered:Organizations to use human mobility data to estimate the adherence to social distancing guidelinesCommunities to monitor their health care systems’ capacity through spatially enabled surge toolsGovernments to use location-allocation methods to site new resources (i.e., testing sites and augmented care sites) in ways that account for at-risk and vulnerable populationsCommunities to use maps and spatial analysis to review case trends at local levels to support reopening of economiesOrganizations to think spatially as they consider “back-to-the-workplace” plans that account for physical distancing and employee safety needsLearning from COVID-19 also includes a “next steps” section that provides ideas, strategies, tools, and actions to help jump-start your own use of GIS, either as a citizen scientist or a health professional. A collection of online resources, including additional stories, videos, new ideas and concepts, and downloadable tools and content, complements this book.Now is the time to use science and data to make informed decisions for our future, and this book shows us how we can do it.Dr. Este GeraghtyDr. Este Geraghty is the chief medical officer and health solutions director at Esri where she leads business development for the Health and Human Services sector.Matt ArtzMatt Artz is a content strategist for Esri Press. He brings a wide breadth of experience in environmental science, technology, and marketing.

The global arborist software market was valued at USD 350.79 Million in 2022 and is projected to reach USD 881.04 Million by 2030, registering a CAGR of 12.2% for the forecast period 2023-2030. Factors Affecting Arborist Software Market Growth

Growing awareness of tree care coupled with benefits of arborist software

With increased awareness of environmental conservation and the importance of urban green spaces, there's a rising demand for professional tree care services. Growing environmental education coupled with technology adoption in tree management helps to drive the arborist software demand. Arborist software helps urban planners, municipalities, and property owners effectively manage and care for trees in cities and suburbs. Arborist software streamlines various tasks like tree inventory management, maintenance scheduling, and communication with clients. This leads to improved efficiency and productivity for arborists.

The Restraining Factor of Arborist Software:

Data Security, privacy concerns;

Data security and privacy concerns are indeed significant factors that can impact the adoption of arborist software. Arborist software often stores information about clients' properties, contact details, and potentially even financial information. Many arborist software solutions use location data to map and manage trees. This location data could be misused if it falls into the wrong hands.

Market Opportunity:

Rising need to improve tree inventory practices;

The rising need to improve tree inventory practices is driven by several factors, including urbanization, environmental awareness, and advancements in technology. As cities grow and expand, urban planners need accurate tree inventory data to ensure that trees are integrated into urban design. Tree inventory helps prevent conflicts between infrastructure development and tree preservation. Arborists software helps to create and maintain digital inventories of trees, including information about species, location, size, health, and maintenance history. In addition, features like Geographic Information Systems (GIS), remote sensing, and mobile data collection technologies have made it easier to create, update, and manage tree inventories.

The COVID-19 impact on Arborist Software Market

The COVID-19 pandemic had various impacts on industries and markets, including the arborist software market. During lockdowns and restrictions, some tree care activities might have been deprioritized due to the sudden focus on healthcare sector. However, the pandemic accelerated digital transformation across industries. Arborists who were previously reliant on manual processes might have recognized the benefits of adopting software for tasks like inventory management, reporting, and client communication. Introduction of Arborist Software

An arborist is a professional who specializes in the cultivation, management, and study of trees, shrubs, and other woody plants. Arborists are trained in tree care practices, including planting, pruning, disease and pest management, and overall tree health maintenance. Arborist software are tools used to assist arborists in their work. These software solutions can provide various functionalities to help arborists manage and maintain trees effectively. Arborists can use software to create and maintain digital inventories of trees, including information about species, location, size, health, and maintenance history. Some common features of arborist software include tree inventory management, health assessment, risk assessment, mapping and GIS integration etc.

I’d love to begin by saying that I have not “arrived” as I believe I am still on a journey of self-discovery. I have heard people say that they find my journey quite interesting and I hope my story inspires someone out there.I had my first encounter with Geographic Information System (GIS) in the third year of my undergraduate study in Geography at the University of Ibadan, Oyo State Nigeria. I was opportune to be introduced to the essentials of GIS by one of the prominent Environmental and Urban Geographers in person of Dr O.J Taiwo. Even though the whole syllabus and teaching sounded abstract to me due to the little exposure to a practical hands-on approach to GIS software, I developed a keen interest in the theoretical learning and I ended up scoring 70% in my final course exam.

This dataset captures in digital form the results of previously published U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Water Mission Area studies related to water resource assessment of Cenozoic strata and unconsolidated deposits within the Mississippi Embayment and the Gulf Coastal Plain of the south-central United States. The data are from reports published from the late 1980s to the mid-1990s by the Gulf Coast Regional Aquifer-System Analysis (RASA) studies and in 2008 by the Mississippi Embayment Regional Aquifer Study (MERAS). These studies, and the data presented here, describe the geologic and hydrogeologic units of the Mississippi embayment, Texas coastal uplands, and the coastal lowlands aquifer systems, south-central United States. This dataset supercedes a previously released dataset on USGS ScienceBase (https://doi.org/10.5066/P9JOHHO6) that was found to contain errors. Following initial release of data, several types of errors were recognized in the well downhole stratigraphic data. Most of these errors were the result of unrecognized improper results in the optical character recognition conversion from the original source report. All downhole data have been thoroughly checked and corrected, data tables were revised, and new point feature classes were created for well location and WellHydrogeologicUnit. GIS data related to the geologic map and subsurface contours were correct in original release and are retained here in original form; only the well data have been revised from the initial data release. The Mississippi embayment, Texas coastal uplands, and coastal lowlands aquifer systems underlie about 487,000 km2 in parts of Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Tennessee, and Texas from the Rio Grande on the west to the western part of Florida on the east. The previously published investigations divided the Cenozoic strata and unconsolidated deposits within the Mississippi Embayment and the Gulf Coastal Plain into 11 major geologic units, typically mapped at the group level, with several additional units at the formational level, which were aggregated into six hydrogeologic units within the Mississippi embayment and Texas coastal uplands and into five hydrogeologic units within the Coastal Lowlands aquifer system. These units include the Mississippi River Valley alluvial aquifer, Vicksburg-Jackson confining unit (contained within the Jackson Group), the upper Claiborne aquifer (contained within the Claiborne Group), the middle Claiborne confining unit (contained within the Claiborne Group), the middle Claiborne aquifer (contained within the Claiborne Group), the lower Claiborne confining unit (contained within the Claiborne Group), the lower Claiborne aquifer (contained within the Claiborne Group), the middle Wilcox aquifer (contained within the Wilcox Group), the lower Wilcox aquifer (contained within the Wilcox Group), and the Midway confining unit (contained within the Midway Group). This dataset includes structure contour and thickness data digitized from plates in two reports, borehole data compiled from two reports, and a geologic map digitized from a report plate. Structure contour and thickness maps of hydrogeologic units in the Mississippi Embayment and Texas coastal uplands had been previously digitized by a USGS study from georeferenced images of altitude and thickness contours in USGS Professional Paper 1416-B (Hosman and Weiss, 1991). These data, which were stored on the USGS Water Mission Area’s NSDI node, were downloaded, reformatted, and attributed for present dataset. Structure contour maps of geologic units in the Mississippi Embayment and Texas coastal uplands were digitized and attributed from georeferenced images of altitude and thickness contours in USGS Professional Paper 1416-G (Hosman, 1996) for this data release. Borehole data in this data release include data compiled for USGS Gulf Coast RASA studies in which a scanned version of a USGS report (Wilson and Hosman, 1987) was converted through optical character recognition and then manipulated to form a data table, and from borehole data compiled for the subsequent MERAS study (Hart and Clark, 2008) where an Excel workbook was downloaded and manipulated for use in a GIS and as part of this dataset. The digital geologic map was digitized from Plate 4 of USGS Professional Paper 1416-G (Hosman, 1996) and then attributed according to the USGS National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program’s GeMS digital geologic map schema. The digital dataset a digital geologic map with contacts and faults and geologic map polygons distributed as separate feature classes within a geographic information system geodatabase. The geologic map database is a digital representation of the geologic compilation of the Guld Coast region originally published as Plate 4 of USGS Professional Paper 1416-G (Hosman, 1996). The dataset includes a second geographic information system geodatabase that contain digital structure contour and thickness data as polyline feature classes for all of the hydrogeologic units contoured in USGS Professional Paper 1416-B (Hosman and Weiss, 1991) and all of the geologic units contoured in USGS Professional Paper 1416-G (Hosman, 1996). The geodatabase also contains separate point feature classes that portray borehole location and the depth to hydrogeologic units penetrated downhole for all boreholes compiled for the USGS RASA sturdies by Wilson and Hosman (1987) and for the subsequent USGS MERAS study (Hart and Clark, 2008). Borehole data are provided in Microsoft Excel spreadsheet that includes separate TABs for well location and tabulation of the depths to top and base of hydrogeologic units intercepted downhole, in a format suitable for import into a relational database. Each of the geographic information system geodatabases include non-spatial tables that describe the sources of geologic or hydrogeologic information, a glossary of terms, and a description of units. Also included is a Data Dictionary that duplicates the Entity and Attribute information contained in the metadata file. To maximize usability, spatial data are also distributed as shapefiles and tabular data are distributed as ascii text files in comma separated values (CSV) format. The landing page to for this data release contains a url to an external web resource where the downhole well data and a single contoured surface from the data release are rendered in 3D and can be interactively viewed by the user.

Welcome to Apiscrapy, your ultimate destination for comprehensive location-based intelligence. As an AI-driven web scraping and automation platform, Apiscrapy excels in converting raw web data into polished, ready-to-use data APIs. With a unique capability to collect Google Address Data, Google Address API, Google Location API, Google Map, and Google Location Data with 100% accuracy, we redefine possibilities in location intelligence.

Key Features:

Unparalleled Data Variety: Apiscrapy offers a diverse range of address-related datasets, including Google Address Data and Google Location Data. Whether you seek B2B address data or detailed insights for various industries, we cover it all.

Integration with Google Address API: Seamlessly integrate our datasets with the powerful Google Address API. This collaboration ensures not just accessibility but a robust combination that amplifies the precision of your location-based insights.

Business Location Precision: Experience a new level of precision in business decision-making with our address data. Apiscrapy delivers accurate and up-to-date business locations, enhancing your strategic planning and expansion efforts.

Tailored B2B Marketing: Customize your B2B marketing strategies with precision using our detailed B2B address data. Target specific geographic areas, refine your approach, and maximize the impact of your marketing efforts.

Use Cases:

Location-Based Services: Companies use Google Address Data to provide location-based services such as navigation, local search, and location-aware advertisements.

Logistics and Transportation: Logistics companies utilize Google Address Data for route optimization, fleet management, and delivery tracking.

E-commerce: Online retailers integrate address autocomplete features powered by Google Address Data to simplify the checkout process and ensure accurate delivery addresses.

Real Estate: Real estate agents and property websites leverage Google Address Data to provide accurate property listings, neighborhood information, and proximity to amenities.

Urban Planning and Development: City planners and developers utilize Google Address Data to analyze population density, traffic patterns, and infrastructure needs for urban planning and development projects.

Market Analysis: Businesses use Google Address Data for market analysis, including identifying target demographics, analyzing competitor locations, and selecting optimal locations for new stores or offices.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS): GIS professionals use Google Address Data as a foundational layer for mapping and spatial analysis in fields such as environmental science, public health, and natural resource management.

Government Services: Government agencies utilize Google Address Data for census enumeration, voter registration, tax assessment, and planning public infrastructure projects.

Tourism and Hospitality: Travel agencies, hotels, and tourism websites incorporate Google Address Data to provide location-based recommendations, itinerary planning, and booking services for travelers.

Discover the difference with Apiscrapy – where accuracy meets diversity in address-related datasets, including Google Address Data, Google Address API, Google Location API, and more. Redefine your approach to location intelligence and make data-driven decisions with confidence. Revolutionize your business strategies today!

California's Central Valley ranges from the mountain fronts toward a central trough, mainly defined by the San Joaquin and Sacramento Rivers, and the relative distance from trough to valley edges is of interest. This data release provides supplemental data for the USGS Professional Paper 1766, titled Groundwater Availability of the Central Valley Aquifer, California and provides geographic information systems (GIS) datasets containing this relative distance grid and supporting data. Included in this data release are shapefiles used to define the Central Valley study area, the Central Valley trough, and a relative distance grid that may be used to spatially define other GIS data into zones between the edge of the Central Valley and the trough. These relative distances were calculated as part of groundwater availability study documented in the Professional Paper, for a 30 x 30-meter cell size grid for the Central Valley. The edge of the valley was represented by the boundary of the valley fill deposits and was assigned an arbitrary value of 1000. The valley trough was represented by the division of California's Department of Water Resource's groundwater subbasins from west to east, from the intersection of Enterprise, Anderson, and Millville subbasins in the north to the Westside and Kings subbasins in the south with an extended line through historic lakes Tulare, Buena Vista, and Kern. This valley trough was assigned a value of 0 which included the boundaries of the historic lakes.

GEODATA TOPO 100K ACT Region is a vector representation of the major topographic features appearing on the ACT Region NATMAP 1:100,000 scale topographic map. An ECW of the ACT Region NATMAP is also available as part of this product. It has been
specifically designed for use in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and provides high quality data for mapping and GIS professionals.
The data is available in three popular GIS formats (ESRI Personal Geodatabase, ESRI Shapefiles and MapInfo mid/mifs) as well as a raster (ECW). They can
either be individually downloaded for free, or all formats can purchased as a single packaged CD-ROM product by contacting the Geoscience Australia Sales Centre.
Product Specifications

-Themes: -Administration: Administrative boundaries, prohibited areas
and reserves
-Aviation: Aircraft facilities, aircraft infrastructure and airports
-Cartography: Cartographic features, graticules and grids -Culture: Cemeteries, dam walls, landmarks, recreational areas, rubbish tips, vertical obstructions, water tanks and
windpumps
-Drainage: Rapids, watercourses and waterfalls
-Framework: Locations and mainland
-Habitation: Buildings, built-up areas, homesteads and populated places
-Industry: Mines -Physiography: Caves, distorted surfaces, and pinnacles -Rail transport: Railways and railway infrastructure -Relief: Contours, hypsometric areas and spot elevations -Road transport: Roads, road infrastructure, foot tracks and footbridges -Series index: Geodata index boundary for the ACT Region data -Survey marks: Horizontal control points -Utility: Pipelines and powerlines
-Vegetation: Cultivated areas, native vegetation areas, and windbreaks -Waterbodies: Bores, flats, reservoirs, springs, watercourse areas, waterholes and water points. -Currency: 2005 -Coordinates: Geographical -Datum: Geocentric Datum of Australia (GDA94), Australian Height Datum (AHD) -Format: ESRI Personal Geodatabase Version 8.3, ESRI Shapefile, MapInfo mid/mif .and ER Mapper Compressed Wavelet (ECW) Raster -Medium: Online Download (free) or Packaged CD-ROM ($99.00)

Geographic scope of work of participants.

The Unpublished Digital Geologic-GIS Map of Virgin Islands National Park, Virgin Islands is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables in a 10.1 file geodatabase (viis_geology.gdb), a 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (viis_geology.mxd), individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files for each GIS data layer, an ancillary map information document (viis_geology.pdf) which contains source map unit descriptions, as well as other source map text, figures and tables, metadata in FGDC text (.txt) and FAQ (.pdf) formats, and a GIS readme file (viis_geology_gis_readme.pdf). Please read the viis_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the file geodatabase and other map files. To request GIS data in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format contact Stephanie O'Meara (stephanie.omeara@colostate.edu; see contact information below). The data is also available as a 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. Google Earth software is available for free at: http://www.google.com/earth/index.html. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: U.S. Geological Survey. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (viis_geology_metadata.txt or viis_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:24,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 12.2 meters or 40 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm). The GIS data projection is NAD83, UTM Zone 20N, however, for the KML/KMZ format the data is projected upon export to WGS84 Geographic, the native coordinate system used by Google Earth. The data is within the area of interest of Virgin Islands National Park.

The Unpublished Digital Geologic-GIS Map of the West Shasta Copper-Zinc District, California is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables in a 10.1 file geodatabase (wscz_geology.gdb), a 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (wscz_geology.mxd), individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files for each GIS data layer, an ancillary map information document (whis_geology_gis_readme.pdf) which contains source map unit descriptions, as well as other source map text, figures and tables, metadata in FGDC text (.txt) and FAQ (.pdf) formats, and a GIS readme file (whis_geology_gis_readme.pdf). Please read the whis_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the file geodatabase and other map files. To request GIS data in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format contact Stephanie O'Meara (stephanie.omeara@colostate.edu; see contact information below). The data is also available as a 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. Google Earth software is available for free at: http://www.google.com/earth/index.html. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: U.S. Geological Survey. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (wscz_geology_metadata.txt or wscz_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:24,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 12.2 meters or 40 feet of their actual _location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the _location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: http://science.nature.nps.gov/im/inventory/geology/GeologyGISDataModel.cfm). The GIS data projection is NAD83, UTM Zone 10N, however, for the KML/KMZ format the data is projected upon export to WGS84 Geographic, the native coordinate system used by Google Earth. The data is within the area of interest of Whiskeytown National Recreation Area.

The Unpublished Digital Geologic-GIS Map of the Moores Creek National Battlefield Area, North Carolina is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables in a 10.1 file geodatabase (mcnb_geology.gdb), a 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (mcnb_geology.mxd), individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files for each GIS data layer, an ancillary map information document (mocr_geology.pdf) which contains source map unit descriptions, as well as other source map text, figures and tables, metadata in FGDC text (.txt) and FAQ (.pdf) formats, and a GIS readme file (mocr_geology_gis_readme.pdf). Please read the mocr_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the file geodatabase and other map files. To request GIS data in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format contact Stephanie O'Meara (stephanie.omeara@colostate.edu; see contact information below). The data is also available as a 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. Google Earth software is available for free at: http://www.google.com/earth/index.html. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: U.S. Geological Survey. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (mcnb_geology_metadata.txt or mcnb_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:250,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 127 meters or 416.7 feet of their actual _location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the _location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm). The GIS data projection is NAD83, UTM Zone 17N, however, for the KML/KMZ format the data is projected upon export to WGS84 Geographic, the native coordinate system used by Google Earth. The data is within the area of interest of Moores Creek National Battlefield.

CrimeMapTutorial is a step-by-step tutorial for learning

crime mapping using ArcView GIS or MapInfo Professional GIS. It was

designed to give users a thorough introduction to most of the

knowledge and skills needed to produce daily maps and spatial data

queries that uniformed officers and detectives find valuable for crime

prevention and enforcement. The tutorials can be used either for

self-learning or in a laboratory setting. The geographic information

system (GIS) and police data were supplied by the Rochester, New York,

Police Department. For each mapping software package, there are three

PDF tutorial workbooks and one WinZip archive containing sample data

and maps. Workbook 1 was designed for GIS users who want to learn how

to use a crime-mapping GIS and how to generate maps and data queries.

Workbook 2 was created to assist data preparers in processing police

data for use in a GIS. This includes address-matching of police

incidents to place them on pin maps and aggregating crime counts by

areas (like car beats) to produce area or choropleth maps. Workbook 3

was designed for map makers who want to learn how to construct useful

crime maps, given police data that have already been address-matched

and preprocessed by data preparers. It is estimated that the three

tutorials take approximately six hours to complete in total, including

exercises.

The 2005 land use boundary data layer is an integral part of the planning data in the Lexington-Fayette-Urban County Government Geographic Information System. This information is used by the Division of Planning in case review, enforcement, and long range planning. GIS data layers are accessed by personnel in most LFUCG divisions for basic applications such as viewing, querying, and map output production.This dataset is designed to represent the existing land use during 2005 within Lexington-Fayette County. The land use in the county is surveyed by the Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government Division of Planning as an initial step in reviewing the comprehensive plan. The dataset is created by dissolving parcels with same land use and utilization of street centerlines as edges.The data is in ESRI feature class format, but can be exported to any number of supported formats, including shapefile and dxf. The native projection for the data is Kentucky State Plane North (NAD83), but may have been reprojected for use in other applications. Please check metadata to determine current projection.Code Values Provided by the LFUCG Division of Planning• DUP: Duplex housing - Two dwelling units sharing a common wall on one lot • TH: Townhomes - Attached dwelling units sharing a common wall, but not a floor to ceiling, with one dwelling unit per lot. Duplexes on separate lots are townhomes. • MFH: Multi-family housing - Three or more attached dwelling units on one lot. Trailor Parks • COM: Commercial: Retail/Restaurant/Personal Services - Commercial: Retail (food, non-food, including gas and alcohol), Restaurants, Entertainment, Applebees Park, Red Mile, Rupp Arena, Personal Services such as Hair and Nail Salons, Tax Preparation, Dry Cleaners, and Athletic Clubs. • OFF: Professional Office - All types of offices including Medical, Engineering/Architectural, Law, Consulting, Real Estate, and Research and Development. • GRQ: Lodging/Group Quarters - Dormitories, Hotels/Motels, Fraternities and Sororities, Nursing Homes/Assisted Living Facilities. • AG: Agricultural - Livestock, Crops, or Woodlands • CON: Construction - Contractor Yards, Concrete Mixing, Building Supplies, Lumber Yards • LI: Light Industry/Manufacturing/Warehouse - All industrial uses that are non-HI and non Construction. Outdoor storage • HI: Heavy Industry - Quarry, Chemical Processing, Stockyards, Gas Tank Farms, junk yards,towing• WHS: Warehousing - Warehouses & storage facilities • TR: Transportation - Airport, Bus Depots/Transit Center, Truck Freight Terminals, Distribution Facilities, Rail yards. • GS: Green Space - Undevelopable areas • P/SP: Public/Semi-public Use - Universities, Colleges, Cemeteries, Libraries, Corrections, Institutions, Museums, Cultural Facilities, Social Services, Fire Stations, Civic Clubs, Government Offices, Public work facilities, Utilities • HLC: Healthcare - Hospitals, Outpatient Surgery Centers, and Office Parks for medical, dental, and pharmaceutical uses exclusively. • REC: Recreation - Parks (private/public), Golf Courses (private/public), Skating Rinks, Neighborhood Recreation Centers, and Multipurpose Indoor Recreation (like the Stadium), Community Centers, Senior Centers • SCH: Schools - Verify coverage on maps. • REL: Places of Worship - Churches, Synagogues, Mosques. Verify coverage on maps. • PL: Parking Lot - Parking as a Principle Use • VAC: Vacant Lot - Non-greenway, Non-park, no structures • UUT: Underutilized Candidates - Vacant Buildings, Dilapidated Buildings.

The Unpublished Digital Geologic-GIS Map of Navajo National Monument and Vicinity, Arizona is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables in a 10.1 file geodatabase (nava_geology.gdb), a 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (nava_geology.mxd), individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files for each GIS data layer, an ancillary map information document (nava_geology.pdf) which contains source map unit descriptions, as well as other source map text, figures and tables, metadata in FGDC text (.txt) and FAQ (.pdf) formats, and a GIS readme file (nava_geology_gis_readme.pdf). Please read the nava_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the file geodatabase and other map files. To request GIS data in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format contact Stephanie O'Meara (stephanie.omeara@colostate.edu; see contact information below). The data is also available as a 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. Google Earth software is available for free at: http://www.google.com/earth/index.html. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: U.S. Geological Survey. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (nava_geology_metadata.txt or nava_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:125,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 63.5 meters or 208.3 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm). The GIS data projection is NAD83, UTM Zone 12N, however, for the KML/KMZ format the data is projected upon export to WGS84 Geographic, the native coordinate system used by Google Earth. The data is within the area of interest of Navajo National Monument.

This hosted feature layer has been published in RI State Plane Feet NAD 83 This is a statewide, seamless digital dataset of the land cover/land use for the State of Rhode Island derived using automated and semi-automated methods and is based on orthophotography captured in spring 2011. The project area encompasses the State of Rhode Island and also extends 1/2 mile into the neighboring states of Connecticut and Massachusetts, or to the limits of the source orthophotography. Geographic feature accuracy meets the National Mapping Standards for 1:5000 scale mapping with respect to base level data (roads, hydrography, and orthos). The minimum mapping unit for this dataset is 0.5 acre.The land use classification scheme used for these data was based on the same Anderson Level III modified coding schema used in previous land use datasets in Rhode Island (1988 & 2003/2004). To provide a statewide dataset representing land cover/land use. The dataset is also intended to be incorporated into the Rhode Island Geographic Information System database for use by federal, state and local government and made available to the general public. The intention of this dataset is to serve as an update to the 2003/2004 land cover/land use dataset. Geography for the dataset was based on ground conditions of 2011 four-band orthophotography with a spatial resolution of 0.5 ft and 2011 LiDAR data and data derivatives with a nominal post spacing of 1m. Additional ancillary data used in the production of this dataset were provided by the State of Rhode Island and included 2003/2004 land cover/land use, road centerline, hydrography, railroads, state boundary, municipal boundary, coastline, location of schools, hospitals, governmental facilities, waste disposal sites, etc. Landuse / Landcover for RI is based upon Anderson Level 3 coding described in the United States Geological Survey Publication: "A Land Use And Land Cover Classification System for Use With Remote Sensor Data, Geological Survey Professional Paper 964" Available Online at: https://landcover.usgs.gov/pdf/anderson.pdf.