About this itemDescription: "A Road Map to Minnesota Treasure" is a static map created by Hannah White (Master of Geographic Information Sciences). It was awarded a U-Spatial Mapping Prize, namely an honorable mention in Graduate Level Cartography.Author/ContributorHannah White, Master of Geographic Information SciencesOrganizationUniversity of MinnesotaOrg Websiterc.umn.edu/uspatial

Raw data used in MSc Thesis. Available for reproducing methodology

This dataset contains raw GIS data sourced from the BAG (Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen; Registry of Addresses and Buildings). It provides comprehensive information on buildings, including advanced height data and administrative details. It also contains geographic divisions within The Hague. Additionally, the dataset incorporates energy label data, offering insights into the energy efficiency and performance of these buildings. This combined dataset serves as the backbone of a Master's thesis in Industrial Ecology, analysing residential and office cooling and its environmental impacts in The Hague, Netherlands. The codebase of this analysis can be found in this Github repository: https://github.com/simonvanlierde/msc-thesis-ie

The dataset includes a background research spreadsheet containing supporting calculations. It also presents geopackages with results from the cooling demand model (CDM) for various scenarios: Status quo (SQ), 2030, and 2050 scenarios (Low, Medium, and High)

Background research data

The background_research_data.xlsx spreadsheet contains comprehensive background research calculations supporting the shaping of input parameters used in the model. It contains several sheets:

• Cooling Technologies: Details the various cooling technologies examined in the study, summarizing their characteristics and the market penetration mixes used in the analysis.
• LCA Results of Ventilation Systems: Provides an overview of the ecoinvent processes serving as proxies for the life-cycle impacts of cooling equipment, along with calculations of the weight of cooling systems and contribution tables from the LCA-based assessment.
• Material Scarcity: A detailed examination of the critical raw material content in the material footprint of ecoinvent processes, representing cooling equipment.
• Heat Plans per Neighbourhood: Forecasts of future heating solutions for each neighbourhood in The Hague.
• Building Stock: Analysis of the projected growth trends in residential and office building stocks in The Hague. AC Market: Market analysis covering air conditioner sales in the Netherlands from 2002 to 2022.
• Climate Change: Computations of climate-related parameters based on KNMI climate scenarios.
• Electricity Mix Analysis: Analysis of future projections for the Dutch electricity grid and calculations of life-cycle carbon intensities of the grid.

Input data

Geographic divisions

• The outline of The Hague municipality through the Municipal boundaries (Gemeenten) layer, sourced from the Administrative boundaries (Bestuurlijke Gemeenten) dataset on the PDOK WFS service.
• District (Wijken) and Neighbourhood (Buurten) layers were downloaded from the PDOK WFS service (from the CBS Wijken en Buurten 2022 data package) and clipped to the outline of The Hague.
• The 4-digit postcodes layer was downloaded from PDOK WFS service (CBS Postcode4 statistieken 2020) and clipped to The Hague's outline. The postcodes within The Hague were subsequently stored in a csv file.
• The census block layer was downloaded from the PDOK WFS service (from the CBS Vierkantstatistieken 100m 2021 data package) and also clipped to the outline of The Hague.
• These layers have been combined in the GeographicDivisions_TheHague GeoPackage.

BAG data

• BAG data was acquired through the download of a BAG GeoPackage from the BAG ATOM download page.
• In the resulting GeoPackage, the Residences (Verblijfsobject) and Building (Pand) layers were clipped to match The Hague's outline.
• The resulting residence data can be found in the BAG_buildings_TheHague GeoPackage.

3D BAG

• Due to limitations imposed by the PDOK WFS service, which restricts the number of downloadable buildings to 10,000, it was necessary to acquire 145 individual GeoPackages for tiles covering The Hague from the 3D BAG website.
• These GeoPackages were merged using the ogr2ogr append function from the GDAL library in bash.
• Roof elevation data was extracted from the LoD 1.2 2D layer from the resulting GeoPackage.
• Ground elevation data was obtained from the Pand layer.
• Both of these layers were clipped to match The Hague's outline.
• Roof and ground elevation data from the LoD 1.2 2D and Pand layers were joined to the Pand layer in the BAG dataset using the BAG ID of each building.
• The resulting data can be found in the BAG_buildings_TheHague GeoPackage.

Energy labels

• Energy labels were downloaded from the Energy label registry (EP-online) and stored in energy_labels_TheNetherlands.csv.

UHI effect data

• A bitmap with the UHI effect intensity in The Hague was retrieved from the from the Dutch Natural Capital Atlas (Atlas Natuurlijk Kapitaal) and stored in UHI_effect_TheHague.tiff.

Output data

• The residence-level data joined to the building layer is contained in the BAG_buildings_with_residence_data_full GeoPackage.
• The results for each building, according to different scenarios, are compiled in the buildings_with_CDM_results_[scenario]_full GeoPackages. The scenarios are abbreviated as follows:
  • SQ: Status Quo, covering the 2018-2022 reference period.
  • 2030: An average scenario projected for the year 2030.
  • 2050_L: A low-impact, best-case scenario for 2050.
  • 2050_M: A medium-impact, moderate scenario for 2050.
  • 2050_H: A high-impact, worst-case scenario for 2050.

Abstract

The Master List of Schools is a record of all schools in South Africa. The data forms part of the national Education Management Information Systems (EMIS) database used to inform education policymakers and managers in the Department of Basic Education (DBE) and the Provincial education departments, as well as to provide valuable information to external stakeholders. The list is maintained by provincial departments and regularly sent to DBE for updating. A key function of the master list is to uniquely identify each school in the country through a school identifier called the EMIS number. Additionally, the list contains data on school quintiles - categories (quintiles) based on the socioeconomic status of the community in which the school is situated. Analyses comparing schools' performance often use school quintiles as control measures for socioeconomic status, to take into account the effect of, for example, poor infrastructure, shortage of materials and deprived home backgrounds on school performance. There are also other basic data fields in the school master list that could provide the means to answer some of the most frequently asked questions about learner enrolment, teachers and learner-teacher ratio of schools. It is a useful dataset for education planners and researchers and is even widely used in the private sector by those who regularly deal with schools.

Geographic coverage

The data has national coverage

Analysis unit

Individuals and institutions

Universe

The survey covers all schools (ordinary and special needs) in South Africa, both public and independent.

Kind of data

Administrative records and survey data

Mode of data collection

Other

Research instrument

Data from the SNAP survey and ANA that are used to compile the Master List of Schools is collected with a survey questionnaire and educator forms. The principle completes the survey questionnaire and each educator (both state paid and other) in each school completes an educator form. Schools record their EMIS number provided by the DBE on the questionnaire and form for identification.

Data appraisal

The 2023 series only includes data for quarter 2 and quarter 3. The GIS coordinates for schools in the Eastern Cape are incorrectly entered in the original data from the DBE. The data entered in the GIS_long variable is incorrectly entered into the GIS_lat variable. This issue only occurs for schools in the Eastern Cape (EC), all other GIS coordinates for all the other provinces is correct. Therefore, for geospatial analysis, users can swap the GIS coordiate data only for the Eastern Cape.

On January 25, 2018 FEMA replaced this map with a new NFHL map with additional functionality which allows users to print official flood maps. On April 1, 2018 this map and NFHL link will no longer function. Please update your bookmark to https://hazards-fema.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=8b0adb51996444d4879338b5529aa9cd. For more information on NFHL data availability, please visit the NFHL GIS Services page at https://hazards.fema.gov/femaportal/wps/portal/NFHLWMSAs of August 1, 2017 all FEMA systems will require the use of the “https” protocol, and “http” links will no longer function. This may impact NFHL web services. The FEMA GeoPlatform (including this map) will not be affected by this change. For more information on how NFHL GIS services will be impacted, please visit the NFHL GIS Services page at https://hazards.fema.gov/femaportal/wps/portal/NFHLWMS.An NFHL FIRMette print service is now available HERE. (For a video tutorial, click here.)OverviewThe National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) dataset represents the current effective flood data for the country, where maps have been modernized. It is a compilation of effective Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) databases and Letters of Map Change (LOMCs). The NFHL is updated as studies go effective. For more information, visit FEMA's Map Service Center (MSC). Base Map ConsiderationsThe default base map is from a USGS service and conforms to FEMA's specification for horizontal accuracy. This base map from The National Map (TNM) consists of National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) and high resolution orthoimagery (HRO) that combine the visual attributes of an aerial photograph with the spatial accuracy and reliability of a map. This map should be considered the best online resource to use for official National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) purposes when determining locations in relation to regulatory flood hazard information. If a different base map is used with the NFHL, the accuracy specification may not be met and the resulting map should be used for general reference only, and not official NFIP purposes. Users can download a simplified base map from the USGS service via: https://viewer.nationalmap.gov/services/ For the specifics of FEMA’s policy on the use of digital flood hazard data for NFIP purposes see: http://www.fema.gov/library/viewRecord.do?id=3235Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) pointsLOMA point locations are approximate. The location of the LOMA is referenced in the legal description of the letter itself. Click the LOMA point for a link to the letter (use the arrows at the top of the popup window to bring up the LOMA info, if needed).This LOMA database may include LOMAs that are no longer effective. To be certain a particular LOMA is currently valid, please check relevant documentation at https://msc.fema.gov/ . Relevant documents can be found for a particular community by choosing to "Search All Products", and finding the community by State and County. Documents include LOMAs found in the "Effective Products" and "LOMC" folders, as well as Revalidations (those LOMAs which are still considered to be effective after a map is revised).Updates3/27/2017 - Updated all references to https to prevent issues with mixed content.5/11/2016 - Added link to NFHL FIRMette Print Service. Updated LOMA and CBRS popup notes.2/20/2014 - Created a General Reference map for use when the USGS base map service is down. Renamed this map to "Official".Further InformationSpecific questions about FEMA flood maps can be directed to FEMAMapSpecialist@riskmapcds.comFor more flood map data, tool, and viewing options, visit the FEMA NFHL page. Information about connecting to web map services (REST, WMS, WFS) can be found here.Several fact sheets are available to help you learn more about FEMA’s NFHL utility: National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) GIS Services Users GuideNational Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL): New Products and Services for FEMA's Flood Hazard Map DataMoving to Digital Flood Hazard Information Standards for Flood Risk Analysis and MappingNFHL GIS Data: Perform Spatial Analyses and Make Custom Maps and Reports

Summary:

The files contained herein represent green roof footprints in NYC visible in 2016 high-resolution orthoimagery of NYC (described at https://github.com/CityOfNewYork/nyc-geo-metadata/blob/master/Metadata/Metadata_AerialImagery.md). Previously documented green roofs were aggregated in 2016 from multiple data sources including from NYC Department of Parks and Recreation and the NYC Department of Environmental Protection, greenroofs.com, and greenhomenyc.org. Footprints of the green roof surfaces were manually digitized based on the 2016 imagery, and a sample of other roof types were digitized to create a set of training data for classification of the imagery. A Mahalanobis distance classifier was employed in Google Earth Engine, and results were manually corrected, removing non-green roofs that were classified and adjusting shape/outlines of the classified green roofs to remove significant errors based on visual inspection with imagery across multiple time points. Ultimately, these initial data represent an estimate of where green roofs existed as of the imagery used, in 2016.

These data are associated with an existing GitHub Repository, https://github.com/tnc-ny-science/NYC_GreenRoofMapping, and as needed and appropriate pending future work, versioned updates will be released here.

Terms of Use:

The Nature Conservancy and co-authors of this work shall not be held liable for improper or incorrect use of the data described and/or contained herein. Any sale, distribution, loan, or offering for use of these digital data, in whole or in part, is prohibited without the approval of The Nature Conservancy and co-authors. The use of these data to produce other GIS products and services with the intent to sell for a profit is prohibited without the written consent of The Nature Conservancy and co-authors. All parties receiving these data must be informed of these restrictions. Authors of this work shall be acknowledged as data contributors to any reports or other products derived from these data.

Associated Files:

As of this release, the specific files included here are:

GreenRoofData2016_20180917.geojson is in the human-readable, GeoJSON format, in geographic coordinates (Lat/Long, WGS84; EPSG 4263).

GreenRoofData2016_20180917.gpkg is in the GeoPackage format, which is an Open Standard readable by most GIS software including Esri products (tested on ArcMap 10.3.1 and multiple versions of QGIS). This dataset is in the New York State Plan Coordinate System (units in feet) for the Long Island Zone, North American Datum 1983, EPSG 2263.

GreenRoofData2016_20180917_Shapefile.zip is a zipped folder containing a Shapefile and associated files. Please note that some field names were truncated due to limitations of Shapefiles, but columns are in the same order as for other files and in the same order as listed below. This dataset is in the New York State Plan Coordinate System (units in feet) for the Long Island Zone, North American Datum 1983, EPSG 2263.

GreenRoofData2016_20180917.csv is a comma-separated values file (CSV) with coordinates for centroids for the green roofs stored in the table itself. This allows for easily opening the data in a tool like spreadsheet software (e.g., Microsoft Excel) or a text editor.

Column Information for the datasets:

Some, but not all fields were joined to the green roof footprint data based on building footprint and tax lot data; those datasets are embedded as hyperlinks below.

fid - Unique identifier

bin - NYC Building ID Number based on overlap between green roof areas and a building footprint dataset for NYC from August, 2017. (Newer building footprint datasets do not have linkages to the tax lot identifier (bbl), thus this older dataset was used). The most current building footprint dataset should be available at: https://data.cityofnewyork.us/Housing-Development/Building-Footprints/nqwf-w8eh. Associated metadata for fields from that dataset are available at https://github.com/CityOfNewYork/nyc-geo-metadata/blob/master/Metadata/Metadata_BuildingFootprints.md.

bbl - Boro Block and Lot number as a single string. This field is a tax lot identifier for NYC, which can be tied to the Digital Tax Map (http://gis.nyc.gov/taxmap/map.htm) and PLUTO/MapPLUTO (https://www1.nyc.gov/site/planning/data-maps/open-data/dwn-pluto-mappluto.page). Metadata for fields pulled from PLUTO/MapPLUTO can be found in the PLUTO Data Dictionary found on the aforementioned page. All joins to this bbl were based on MapPLUTO version 18v1.

gr_area - Total area of the footprint of the green roof as per this data layer, in square feet, calculated using the projected coordinate system (EPSG 2263).

bldg_area - Total area of the footprint of the associated building, in square feet, calculated using the projected coordinate system (EPSG 2263).

prop_gr - Proportion of the building covered by green roof according to this layer (gr_area/bldg_area).

cnstrct_yr - Year the building was constructed, pulled from the Building Footprint data.

doitt_id - An identifier for the building assigned by the NYC Dept. of Information Technology and Telecommunications, pulled from the Building Footprint Data.

heightroof - Height of the roof of the associated building, pulled from the Building Footprint Data.

feat_code - Code describing the type of building, pulled from the Building Footprint Data.

groundelev - Lowest elevation at the building level, pulled from the Building Footprint Data.

qa - Flag indicating a positive QA/QC check (using multiple types of imagery); all data in this dataset should have 'Good'

notes - Any notes about the green roof taken during visual inspection of imagery; for example, it was noted if the green roof appeared to be missing in newer imagery, or if there were parts of the roof for which it was unclear whether there was green roof area or potted plants.

classified - Flag indicating whether the green roof was detected image classification. (1 for yes, 0 for no)

digitized - Flag indicating whether the green roof was digitized prior to image classification and used as training data. (1 for yes, 0 for no)

newlyadded - Flag indicating whether the green roof was detected solely by visual inspection after the image classification and added. (1 for yes, 0 for no)

original_source - Indication of what the original data source was, whether a specific website, agency such as NYC Dept. of Parks and Recreation (DPR), or NYC Dept. of Environmental Protection (DEP). Multiple sources are separated by a slash.

address - Address based on MapPLUTO, joined to the dataset based on bbl.

borough - Borough abbreviation pulled from MapPLUTO.

ownertype - Owner type field pulled from MapPLUTO.

zonedist1 - Zoning District 1 type pulled from MapPLUTO.

spdist1 - Special District 1 pulled from MapPLUTO.

bbl_fixed - Flag to indicate whether bbl was manually fixed. Since tax lot data may have changed slightly since the release of the building footprint data used in this work, a small percentage of bbl codes had to be manually updated based on overlay between the green roof footprint and the MapPLUTO data, when no join was feasible based on the bbl code from the building footprint data. (1 for yes, 0 for no)

For GreenRoofData2016_20180917.csv there are two additional columns, representing the coordinates of centroids in geographic coordinates (Lat/Long, WGS84; EPSG 4263):

xcoord - Longitude in decimal degrees.

ycoord - Latitude in decimal degrees.

Acknowledgements:

This work was primarily supported through funding from the J.M. Kaplan Fund, awarded to the New York City Program of The Nature Conservancy, with additional support from the New York Community Trust, through New York City Audubon and the Green Roof Researchers Alliance.

This dataset includes Level 1B (L1B) data products from the MODIS/ASTER Airborne Simulator (MASTER) instrument. The spectral data were collected during two flights aboard a DOE B-200 aircraft over Colorado and Utah, U.S., on 2004-07-01. Objectives of this deployment included mapping geological substrates and their mineral content. This deployment was coordinated by the U.S. Department of Energy's Remote Sensing Laboratory (RSL) located at Nellis Air Force Base near Las Vegas, Nevada. Data products include L1B georeferenced multispectral imagery of calibrated radiance in 50 bands covering wavelengths of 0.460 to 12.879 micrometers at approximately 10-meter spatial resolution. The L1B file format is HDF-4. In addition, the dataset includes flight paths, spectral band information, instrument configuration, ancillary notes, and summary information for each flight, and browse images derived from each L1B data file.

A data collection campaign using the MODIS/ASTER airborne simulator (MASTER) was conducted in the greater Phoenix metropolitan area in July 2011 to collect visible through mid-infrared multispectral imagery. High resolution (7 m/pixel) land surface temperature products for day and night periods were calculated using the mid-infrared bands of data; surface reflectance, albedo, and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) products were calculated using the visible through shortwave infrared band data for 41 select neighborhoods. While the full MASTER dataset has been processed to at-sensor radiance, it did not include native geolocation data. As georeferencing the entire dataset was not possible with funds available, the processed data described above were extracted for the 41 spatially discrete Phoenix Area Social Survey neighborhoods within the MASTER flight boundary.

The National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) data incorporates all Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) databases published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and any Letters of Map Revision (LOMRs) that have been issued against those databases since their publication date. It is updated on a monthly basis. The FIRM Database is the digital, geospatial version of the flood hazard information shown on the published paper FIRMs. The FIRM Database depicts flood risk information and supporting data used to develop the risk data. The primary risk classifications used are the 1-percent-annual-chance flood event, the 0.2-percent-annual-chance flood event, and areas of minimal flood risk. The FIRM Database is derived from Flood Insurance Studies (FISs), previously published FIRMs, flood hazard analyses performed in support of the FISs and FIRMs, and new mapping data, where available. The FISs and FIRMs are published by FEMA. The NFHL is available as State or US Territory data sets. Each State or Territory data set consists of all FIRM Databases and corresponding LOMRs available on the publication date of the data set. The specification for the horizontal control of FIRM Databases is consistent with those required for mapping at a scale of 1:12,000. This file is georeferenced to the Earth's surface using the Geographic Coordinate System (GCS) and North American Datum of 1983.This dataset published by FEMA on 5/18/2016. Available for download at https://msc.fema.gov.This GIS data is provided "AS IS." The County of Monterey (COUNTY) makes no warranties, express or implied, including without limitation, any implied warranties of merchantability and/or fitness for a particular purpose, regarding the accuracy, completeness, value, quality, validity, merchantability, suitability, and/or condition, of the GIS data. The COUNTY also specifically does not guarantee that the information is free from harmful effects or viruses and that it will not harm the users’ computer. By using this GIS, users accept sole responsibility for ensuring the protection of their own computer equipment and specifically hold COUNTY harmless from any damage or liability that might ensue do the use of the data. Users of COUNTY's GIS data are hereby notified that current public primary information sources should be consulted for verification of the data and information contained herein. Since the GIS data is dynamic, it will by its nature be inconsistent with the official COUNTY assessment roll file, surveys, maps and/or other documents produced by the County Office of the Assessor, the County Surveyor, and/or other relevant County Offices. Any use of COUNTY's GIS data is done exclusively at the risk of the party making such use.

The National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) data incorporates all Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) databases published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and any Letters of Map Revision (LOMRs) that have been issued against those databases since their publication date. It is updated on a monthly basis. The FIRM Database is the digital, geospatial version of the flood hazard information shown on the published paper FIRMs. The FIRM Database depicts flood risk information and supporting data used to develop the risk data. The primary risk classifications used are the 1-percent-annual-chance flood event, the 0.2-percent-annual-chance flood event, and areas of minimal flood risk. The FIRM Database is derived from Flood Insurance Studies (FISs), previously published FIRMs, flood hazard analyses performed in support of the FISs and FIRMs, and new mapping data, where available. The FISs and FIRMs are published by FEMA. The NFHL is available as State or US Territory data sets. Each State or Territory data set consists of all FIRM Databases and corresponding LOMRs available on the publication date of the data set. The specification for the horizontal control of FIRM Databases is consistent with those required for mapping at a scale of 1:12,000. This file is georeferenced to the Earth's surface using the Geographic Coordinate System (GCS) and North American Datum of 1983.This dataset published by FEMA on 5/18/2016. Available for download at https://msc.fema.gov.This GIS data is provided "AS IS." The County of Monterey (COUNTY) makes no warranties, express or implied, including without limitation, any implied warranties of merchantability and/or fitness for a particular purpose, regarding the accuracy, completeness, value, quality, validity, merchantability, suitability, and/or condition, of the GIS data. The COUNTY also specifically does not guarantee that the information is free from harmful effects or viruses and that it will not harm the users’ computer. By using this GIS, users accept sole responsibility for ensuring the protection of their own computer equipment and specifically hold COUNTY harmless from any damage or liability that might ensue do the use of the data. Users of COUNTY's GIS data are hereby notified that current public primary information sources should be consulted for verification of the data and information contained herein. Since the GIS data is dynamic, it will by its nature be inconsistent with the official COUNTY assessment roll file, surveys, maps and/or other documents produced by the County Office of the Assessor, the County Surveyor, and/or other relevant County Offices. Any use of COUNTY's GIS data is done exclusively at the risk of the party making such use.