Discover the booming GIS mapping tools market! This in-depth analysis reveals a $15B market in 2025 projected to reach $39B by 2033, driven by cloud adoption, AI integration, and surging demand across sectors. Explore key trends, leading companies (Esri, ArcGIS, QGIS, etc.), and regional growth forecasts.

Discover the booming GIS Mapping Tools market! This in-depth analysis reveals key trends, growth drivers, and leading companies shaping the future of spatial data. Explore market size, CAGR, regional insights, and application segments (Geological Exploration, Urban Planning, etc.). Learn how cloud-based solutions are revolutionizing GIS.

The size of the GIS Mapping Tools market was valued at USD XXX million in 2024 and is projected to reach USD XXX million by 2033, with an expected CAGR of XX % during the forecast period.

Discover the booming GIS Mapping Tools market! Explore key trends, growth drivers, and leading companies in this $15 billion industry projected to reach $28 billion by 2033. Learn about cloud-based solutions, regional market shares, and the future of geographic information systems.

The Global GIS Mapping Tools Market is poised for significant expansion, projected to reach a substantial market size of $10 billion by 2025, with an anticipated Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 12.5% through 2033. This robust growth trajectory is fueled by the increasing demand for advanced spatial analysis and visualization capabilities across a multitude of sectors. Key drivers include the escalating need for accurate geological exploration to identify and manage natural resources, the critical role of GIS in planning and executing complex water conservancy projects for sustainable water management, and the indispensable application of GIS in urban planning for efficient city development and infrastructure management. Furthermore, the burgeoning adoption of cloud-based and web-based GIS solutions is democratizing access to powerful mapping tools, enabling broader use by organizations of all sizes. The market is also benefiting from advancements in data processing, artificial intelligence integration, and the growing availability of open-source GIS platforms. Despite the optimistic outlook, certain restraints could temper the market's full potential. High initial investment costs for sophisticated GIS software and hardware, coupled with a shortage of skilled GIS professionals in certain regions, may pose challenges. However, the overwhelming benefits of enhanced decision-making, improved operational efficiency, and the ability to gain deep insights from spatial data are compelling organizations to overcome these hurdles. The competitive landscape is dynamic, featuring established players like Esri and Autodesk alongside innovative providers such as Mapbox and CARTO, all vying for market share by offering specialized features, user-friendly interfaces, and integrated solutions. The continuous evolution of GIS technology, driven by the integration of remote sensing data, big data analytics, and real-time information, will continue to shape the market's future. Here's a comprehensive report description on GIS Mapping Tools, incorporating your specified requirements:

This in-depth report provides a panoramic view of the global GIS Mapping Tools market, meticulously analyzing its landscape from the Historical Period (2019-2024) through to the Forecast Period (2025-2033), with 2025 serving as both the Base Year and the Estimated Year. The study period encompasses 2019-2033, offering a robust historical context and forward-looking projections. The market is valued in the millions of US dollars, with detailed segment-specific valuations and growth trajectories. The report is structured to deliver actionable intelligence to stakeholders, covering market concentration, key trends, regional dominance, product insights, and critical industry dynamics. It delves into the intricate interplay of companies such as Esri, Hexagon, Autodesk, CARTO, and Mapbox, alongside emerging players like Geoway and Shenzhen Edraw Software, across diverse applications including Geological Exploration, Water Conservancy Projects, and Urban Planning. The analysis also differentiates between Cloud Based and Web Based GIS solutions, providing a granular understanding of market segmentation.

The booming GIS Mapping Tools market is projected to reach $45 billion by 2033, driven by cloud adoption and AI. Explore market trends, key players (Esri, Autodesk, Hexagon), and regional growth in this comprehensive analysis.

The files linked to this reference are the geospatial data created as part of the completion of the baseline vegetation inventory project for the NPS park unit. Current format is ArcGIS file geodatabase but older formats may exist as shapefiles. We converted the photointerpreted data into a format usable in a geographic information system (GIS) by employing three fundamental processes: (1) orthorectify, (2) digitize, and (3) develop the geodatabase. All digital map automation was projected in Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM), Zone 16, using the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83). Orthorectify: We orthorectified the interpreted overlays by using OrthoMapper, a softcopy photogrammetric software for GIS. One function of OrthoMapper is to create orthorectified imagery from scanned and unrectified imagery (Image Processing Software, Inc., 2002). The software features a method of visual orientation involving a point-and-click operation that uses existing orthorectified horizontal and vertical base maps. Of primary importance to us, OrthoMapper also has the capability to orthorectify the photointerpreted overlays of each photograph based on the reference information provided. Digitize: To produce a polygon vector layer for use in ArcGIS (Environmental Systems Research Institute [ESRI], Redlands, California), we converted each raster-based image mosaic of orthorectified overlays containing the photointerpreted data into a grid format by using ArcGIS. In ArcGIS, we used the ArcScan extension to trace the raster data and produce ESRI shapefiles. We digitally assigned map-attribute codes (both map-class codes and physiognomic modifier codes) to the polygons and checked the digital data against the photointerpreted overlays for line and attribute consistency. Ultimately, we merged the individual layers into a seamless layer. Geodatabase: At this stage, the map layer has only map-attribute codes assigned to each polygon. To assign meaningful information to each polygon (e.g., map-class names, physiognomic definitions, links to NVCS types), we produced a feature-class table, along with other supportive tables and subsequently related them together via an ArcGIS Geodatabase. This geodatabase also links the map to other feature-class layers produced from this project, including vegetation sample plots, accuracy assessment (AA) sites, aerial photo locations, and project boundary extent. A geodatabase provides access to a variety of interlocking data sets, is expandable, and equips resource managers and researchers with a powerful GIS tool.

The Digital Geomorphic-GIS Map of Gulf Islands National Seashore (5-meter accuracy and 1-foot resolution 2006-2007 mapping), Mississippi and Florida is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) a 10.1 file geodatabase (guis_geomorphology.gdb), a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage, and 3.) 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file (guis_geomorphology.mapx) and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer), as well as with a 2.) 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (guis_geomorphology.mxd) and individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files (for each GIS data layer). The OGC geopackage is supported with a QGIS project (.qgz) file. Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) A GIS readme file (guis_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (guis_geomorphology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (guis_geomorphology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the guis_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. Google Earth software is available for free at: https://www.google.com/earth/versions/. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri,htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: U.S. Geological Survey. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (guis_geomorphology_metadata.txt or guis_geomorphology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:26,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 13.2 meters or 43.3 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).

Discover the booming interactive map creation tools market! This in-depth analysis reveals a $2.5 billion market in 2025, projected to reach $8 billion by 2033, driven by cloud-based solutions and growing data visualization needs. Learn about key players, market segmentation, and regional trends shaping this exciting sector.

eXtension Foundation, the University of New Hampshire, and Virginia Tech have developed a mapping and data exploration tool to assist Cooperative Extension staff and administrators in making strategic planning and programming decisions. The tool, called the National Extension Web-mapping Tool (or NEWT), is the key in efforts to make spatial data available within cooperative extension system. NEWT requires no GIS experience to use. NEWT provides access for CES staff and administrators to relevant spatial data at a variety of scales (national, state, county) in useful formats (maps, tables, graphs), all without the need for any experience or technical skills in Geographic Information System (GIS) software. By providing consistent access to relevant spatial data throughout the country in a format useful to CES staff and administrators, NEWT represents a significant advancement for the use of spatial technology in CES. Users of the site will be able to discover the data layers which are of most interest to them by making simple, guided choices about topics related to their work. Once the relevant data layers have been chosen, a mapping interface will allow the exploration of spatial relationships and the creation and export of maps. Extension areas to filter searches include 4-H Youth & Family, Agriculture, Business, Community, Food & Health, and Natural Resources. Users will also be able to explore data by viewing data tables and graphs. This Beta release is open for public use and feedback. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Website Pointer to NEWT National Extension Web-mapping Tool Beta. File Name: Web Page, url: https://www.mapasyst.org/newt/ The site leads the user through the process of selecting the data in which they would be most interested, then provides a variety of ways for the user to explore the data (maps, graphs, tables).

This mapping tool provides a representation of the general watershed boundaries for stream systems declared fully appropriated by the State Water Board. The boundaries were created by Division of Water Rights staff by delineating FASS critical reaches and consolidating HUC 12 sub-watersheds to form FASS Watershed boundaries. As such, the boundaries are in most cases conservative with respect to the associated stream system. However, users should check neighboring FASS Watersheds to ensure the stream system of interest is not restricted by other FASS listings. For more information regarding the Declaration of Fully Appropriated Stream Systems, visit the Division of Water Rights’ Fully Appropriated Streams webpage. How to Use the Interactive Mapping Tool: If it is your first time viewing the map, you will need to click the “OK” box on the splash screen and agree to the disclaimer before continuing. Navigate to your point of interest by either using the search bar or by zooming in on the map. You may enter a stream name, street address, or watershed ID in the search bar. Click on the map to identify the location of interest and one or more pop-up boxes may appear with information about the fully appropriated stream systems within the general watershed boundaries of the identified location. The information provided in the pop-up box may include: (a) stream name, (b) tributary, (c) season declared fully appropriated, (d) Board Decisions/Water Right Orders, and/or (e) court references/adjudications. You may toggle the FAS Streams reference layer on and off to find representative critical reaches associated with the FASS Watershed layer. Please note that this layer is for general reference purposes only and ultimately the critical reach listed in Appendix A of Water Rights Order 98-08 and Appendix A together with any associated footnotes controls. Note: A separate FAS Watershed boundary layer was created for the Bay-Delta Watershed. The Bay-Delta Watershed layer should be toggled on to check if the area of interest is fully appropriated under State Water Board Decision 1594.

The size of the GIS Mapping Software market was valued at USD XXX million in 2024 and is projected to reach USD XXX million by 2033, with an expected CAGR of XX % during the forecast period.

Market Research Intellect's GIS Mapping Software Market Report highlights a valuation of USD 3.2 billion in 2024 and anticipates growth to USD 6.5 billion by 2033, with a CAGR of 8.5% from 2026-2033.Explore insights on demand dynamics, innovation pipelines, and competitive landscapes.

The Digital Geologic-GIS Map of San Miguel Island, California is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) a 10.1 file geodatabase (smis_geology.gdb), a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage, and 3.) 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file (smis_geology.mapx) and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer), as well as with a 2.) 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (smis_geology.mxd) and individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files (for each GIS data layer). The OGC geopackage is supported with a QGIS project (.qgz) file. Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) this file (chis_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (chis_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (smis_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the chis_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. Google Earth software is available for free at: https://www.google.com/earth/versions/. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri,htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: American Association of Petroleum Geologists. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (smis_geology_metadata.txt or smis_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:24,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 12.2 meters or 40 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).

Discover the booming GIS mapping tools market! Explore market size, growth trends (8% CAGR), key players (Esri, QGIS, ArcGIS), and regional insights. Learn how cloud-based GIS and AI are transforming industries like urban planning and geological exploration. Get the latest data and forecasts for 2025-2033.

The global mapping software market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing demand across various sectors. While precise figures for market size and CAGR are absent from the provided data, a reasonable estimation can be made based on industry trends. Considering the presence of major players like Adobe, Autodesk, and Microsoft, and the consistent advancements in GIS technology and location-based services, a conservative estimate places the 2025 market size at approximately $15 billion USD. Assuming a steady growth trajectory influenced by factors like increasing adoption of cloud-based solutions, the integration of AI and machine learning for enhanced mapping capabilities, and the growing need for precise location data in logistics, urban planning, and environmental monitoring, a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 8-10% over the forecast period (2025-2033) seems plausible. This would project market values significantly higher by 2033. This growth is fueled by several key trends. The increasing availability of high-resolution satellite imagery and other geospatial data provides richer inputs for mapping applications. Furthermore, the rising adoption of mobile devices equipped with GPS technology and the proliferation of location-based services (LBS) are expanding the market's addressable user base. However, challenges remain, such as the high cost of advanced mapping software and the complexities associated with data integration and management. Nevertheless, the overall market outlook remains positive, with continued expansion anticipated across various segments and geographic regions. The competitive landscape is marked by a mix of established players and emerging startups, leading to innovation and the continuous improvement of mapping technologies.

Explore the dynamic Mapping Software market, driven by engineering and industrial design needs. Discover growth drivers, key trends, restraints, and leading companies shaping the future of geospatial solutions from 2019-2033.

The “DTPW Permit GIS Mapping Tool Web Map” serves as the foundational map for the DTPW Permit GIS Mapping Application—a public application for submitting, editing, and reviewing transportation permits within Miami-Dade County.Key Functions:

Provides editors with an intuitive map-based interface for adding and updating permit records. Incorporates Arcade expressions in the Editor forms to automatically populate address and intersection fields. Serves as the primary workspace for editing permit data before it's integrated into other DTPW workflows.Editable Feature Layers (For Permit Data Collection and Updates):

Add a Point Arcade Function: Automatically populates the address field by finding the nearest parcel from the Property Boundary layer within 60 meters.

Add a Segment Arcade Function: Populates start and end address fields by retrieving nearby intersection names from the GeoIntersection layer within a 25-meter buffer.

Add a Polygon Arcade Function: Populates address fields by identifying the nearest intersections for each of the polygon’s four corner vertices, using the GeoIntersection layer.

Reference Data Layers (For Spatial Validation and Data Extraction):

Property Boundary

Parcel boundaries containing address information. Used to support the automated address population for point permits.

GeoIntersection

A dataset of intersection points and names. Used to populate intersection-related fields in both segment and polygon permits.

The booming Geospatial Solutions market is projected to reach $375.8 Billion by 2033, growing at a CAGR of 7.2%. This comprehensive analysis explores market drivers, trends, restraints, and key players across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific. Discover insights into hardware, software, service segments and applications like utility, transportation, and defense.

The Digital Geologic-GIS Map of Sagamore Hill National Historic Site and Vicinity, New York is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) a 10.1 file geodatabase (sahi_geology.gdb), a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage, and 3.) 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file (sahi_geology.mapx) and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer), as well as with a 2.) 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (sahi_geology.mxd) and individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files (for each GIS data layer). The OGC geopackage is supported with a QGIS project (.qgz) file. Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) A GIS readme file (sahi_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (sahi_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (sahi_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the sahi_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. Google Earth software is available for free at: https://www.google.com/earth/versions/. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri,htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: U.S. Geological Survey. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (sahi_geology_metadata.txt or sahi_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:62,500 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 31.8 meters or 104.2 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).