Facebook
TwitterData files for "Eccles KM, Karmaus AL, Kleinstreuer NC, Parham F, Rider CV, Wambaugh JF, Messier KP. A geospatial modeling approach to quantifying the risk of exposure to environmental chemical mixtures via a common molecular target. Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jan 10;855:158905. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158905. Epub 2022 Sep 21. PMID: 36152849"
Facebook
TwitterLearn Geographic Mapping with Altair, Vega-Lite and Vega using Curated Datasets
Complete geographic and geophysical data collection for mapping and visualization. This consolidation includes 18 complementary datasets used by 31+ Vega, Vega-Lite, and Altair examples 📊. Perfect for learning geographic visualization techniques including projections, choropleths, point maps, vector fields, and interactive displays.
Source data lives on GitHub and can also be accessed via CDN. The vega-datasets project serves as a common repository for example datasets used across these visualization libraries and related projects.
airports.csv), lines (like londonTubeLines.json), and polygons (like us-10m.json).windvectors.csv, annual-precip.json).This pack includes 18 datasets covering base maps, reference points, statistical data for choropleths, and geophysical data.
| Dataset | File | Size | Format | License | Description | Key Fields / Join Info |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| US Map (1:10m) | us-10m.json | 627 KB | TopoJSON | CC-BY-4.0 | US state and county boundaries. Contains states and counties objects. Ideal for choropleths. | id (FIPS code) property on geometries |
| World Map (1:110m) | world-110m.json | 117 KB | TopoJSON | CC-BY-4.0 | World country boundaries. Contains countries object. Suitable for world-scale viz. | id property on geometries |
| London Boroughs | londonBoroughs.json | 14 KB | TopoJSON | CC-BY-4.0 | London borough boundaries. | properties.BOROUGHN (name) |
| London Centroids | londonCentroids.json | 2 KB | GeoJSON | CC-BY-4.0 | Center points for London boroughs. | properties.id, properties.name |
| London Tube Lines | londonTubeLines.json | 78 KB | GeoJSON | CC-BY-4.0 | London Underground network lines. | properties.name, properties.color |
| Dataset | File | Size | Format | License | Description | Key Fields / Join Info |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| US Airports | airports.csv | 205 KB | CSV | Public Domain | US airports with codes and coordinates. | iata, state, `l... |
Facebook
TwitterWell-established conservation planning principles and techniques framed by geodesign were used to assess the restorability of areas that historically supported coastal wetlands along the U.S. shore of Saginaw Bay. The resulting analysis supported planning efforts to identify, prioritize, and track wetland restoration opportunity and investment in the region. To accomplish this, publicly available data, criteria derived from the regional managers and local stakeholders, and geospatial analysis were used to form an ecological model for spatial prioritization.
Facebook
TwitterAccurate mapping and disaggregation of key health and demographic risk factors have become increasingly important for disease surveillance, which can reveal geographical social inequalities for improved health interventions and for monitoring progress on relevant Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Household surveys like the Demographic and Health Surveys have been widely used as a proxy for mapping SDG-related household characteristics. However, there is no consensus on the workflow to be used, and different methods have been implemented with varying complexities. This study aims to compare multiple modelling frameworks to model indicators of human vulnerability to malaria (SDG Target 3.3) in Senegal. These indicators were categorised into socioeconomic (e.g., stunting prevalence, wealth index) and malaria prevention indicators (e.g., indoor residual spraying, insecticide-treated net ownership). We compared three categories of the commonly used methods: (1) spatial interpolation methods (i.e., inverse distance weighting, thin plate splines, kriging), (2) ensemble methods (i.e., random forest), and (3) Bayesian geostatistical models. Most indicators could be modelled with medium to high predictive accuracy, with R2 values ranging from 0.40 to 0.86. No method or method category emerged as the best, but performance varied widely. Overall, socioeconomic indicators were generally better predicted by covariate-based models (e.g., random forest and Bayesian models), while methods using spatial autocorrelation alone (e.g., thin plate splines) performed better for variables with heterogeneous spatial structure, such as ethnicity and malaria prevention indicators. Increasing the complexity of the models did not always improve predictive performance, e.g., thin plate splines sometimes outperformed random forest or Bayesian geostatistical models. Beyond performance, we compared the different methods using other criteria (e.g., the ability to constrain the prediction range or to quantify prediction uncertainty) and discussed their implications for selecting a modelling approach tailored to the needs of the end user.
Facebook
TwitterMIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
License information was derived automatically
ArcGIS Map Packages and GIS Data for Gillreath-Brown, Nagaoka, and Wolverton (2019)
**When using the GIS data included in these map packages, please cite all of the following:
Gillreath-Brown, Andrew, Lisa Nagaoka, and Steve Wolverton. A Geospatial Method for Estimating Soil Moisture Variability in Prehistoric Agricultural Landscapes, 2019. PLoSONE 14(8):e0220457. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220457
Gillreath-Brown, Andrew, Lisa Nagaoka, and Steve Wolverton. ArcGIS Map Packages for: A Geospatial Method for Estimating Soil Moisture Variability in Prehistoric Agricultural Landscapes, Gillreath-Brown et al., 2019. Version 1. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2572018
OVERVIEW OF CONTENTS
This repository contains map packages for Gillreath-Brown, Nagaoka, and Wolverton (2019), as well as the raw digital elevation model (DEM) and soils data, of which the analyses was based on. The map packages contain all GIS data associated with the analyses described and presented in the publication. The map packages were created in ArcGIS 10.2.2; however, the packages will work in recent versions of ArcGIS. (Note: I was able to open the packages in ArcGIS 10.6.1, when tested on February 17, 2019). The primary files contained in this repository are:
For additional information on contents of the map packages, please see see "Map Packages Descriptions" or open a map package in ArcGIS and go to "properties" or "map document properties."
LICENSES
Code: MIT year: 2019
Copyright holders: Andrew Gillreath-Brown, Lisa Nagaoka, and Steve Wolverton
CONTACT
Andrew Gillreath-Brown, PhD Candidate, RPA
Department of Anthropology, Washington State University
andrew.brown1234@gmail.com – Email
andrewgillreathbrown.wordpress.com – Web
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This seminar is an applied study of deep learning methods for extracting information from geospatial data, such as aerial imagery, multispectral imagery, digital terrain data, and other digital cartographic representations. We first provide an introduction and conceptualization of artificial neural networks (ANNs). Next, we explore appropriate loss and assessment metrics for different use cases followed by the tensor data model, which is central to applying deep learning methods. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are then conceptualized with scene classification use cases. Lastly, we explore semantic segmentation, object detection, and instance segmentation. The primary focus of this course is semantic segmenation for pixel-level classification. The associated GitHub repo provides a series of applied examples. We hope to continue to add examples as methods and technologies further develop. These examples make use of a vareity of datasets (e.g., SAT-6, topoDL, Inria, LandCover.ai, vfillDL, and wvlcDL). Please see the repo for links to the data and associated papers. All examples have associated videos that walk through the process, which are also linked to the repo. A variety of deep learning architectures are explored including UNet, UNet++, DeepLabv3+, and Mask R-CNN. Currenlty, two examples use ArcGIS Pro and require no coding. The remaining five examples require coding and make use of PyTorch, Python, and R within the RStudio IDE. It is assumed that you have prior knowledge of coding in the Python and R enviroinments. If you do not have experience coding, please take a look at our Open-Source GIScience and Open-Source Spatial Analytics (R) courses, which explore coding in Python and R, respectively. After completing this seminar you will be able to: explain how ANNs work including weights, bias, activation, and optimization. describe and explain different loss and assessment metrics and determine appropriate use cases. use the tensor data model to represent data as input for deep learning. explain how CNNs work including convolutional operations/layers, kernel size, stride, padding, max pooling, activation, and batch normalization. use PyTorch, Python, and R to prepare data, produce and assess scene classification models, and infer to new data. explain common semantic segmentation architectures and how these methods allow for pixel-level classification and how they are different from traditional CNNs. use PyTorch, Python, and R (or ArcGIS Pro) to prepare data, produce and assess semantic segmentation models, and infer to new data.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Additional file 3: Table S2. Number of districts by region in Nigeria where vaccination coverage for DTP3 and MVC1 is > 100%. Numerator: DTP3 and MCV1 vaccination doses from DHMISs, as reported to the WHO [38]. Denominators: official population projection from the last census as reported to WHO [38]; WorldPop modelled top-down population estimate [23]; and GRID3 modelled bottom-up population estimate [39, 40].
Facebook
TwitterAttribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Optimized for Geospatial and Big Data Analysis
This dataset is a refined and enhanced version of the original DataCo SMART SUPPLY CHAIN FOR BIG DATA ANALYSIS dataset, specifically designed for advanced geospatial and big data analysis. It incorporates geocoded information, language translations, and cleaned data to enable applications in logistics optimization, supply chain visualization, and performance analytics.
src_points.geojson: Source point geometries. dest_points.geojson: Destination point geometries. routes.geojson: Line geometries representing source-destination routes. DataCoSupplyChainDatasetRefined.csv
src_points.geojson
dest_points.geojson
routes.geojson
This dataset is based on the original dataset published by Fabian Constante, Fernando Silva, and António Pereira:
Constante, Fabian; Silva, Fernando; Pereira, António (2019), “DataCo SMART SUPPLY CHAIN FOR BIG DATA ANALYSIS”, Mendeley Data, V5, doi: 10.17632/8gx2fvg2k6.5.
Refinements include geospatial processing, translation, and additional cleaning by the uploader to enhance usability and analytical potential.
This dataset is designed to empower data scientists, researchers, and business professionals to explore the intersection of geospatial intelligence and supply chain optimization.
Facebook
TwitterWell-established conservation planning principles and techniques framed by geodesign were used to assess the restorability of areas that historically supported coastal wetlands along the U.S. shore of the connecting rivers (Detroit River and St. Clair River). The resulting analysis supported planning efforts to identify, prioritize, and track wetland restoration opportunity and investment in the region. To accomplish this, publicly available data, criteria derived from the regional managers and local stakeholders, and geospatial analysis were used to form an ecological model for spatial prioritization.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policy
The United States geospatial analytics market is experiencing robust growth, projected to reach a significant size within the forecast period (2025-2033). The market's Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 10.04% from 2019-2033 indicates a consistently expanding demand for geospatial data analysis across diverse sectors. Key drivers include the increasing availability of high-resolution satellite imagery, advancements in data processing capabilities (cloud computing, AI), and the growing need for data-driven decision-making in various industries. Specific sectors like agriculture, utilizing geospatial analytics for precision farming, and the defense and intelligence sectors, leveraging it for surveillance and strategic planning, are major contributors to market growth. Further fueling expansion are trends like the rising adoption of Internet of Things (IoT) devices generating location-based data, and the increasing sophistication of geospatial analytics software, incorporating advanced visualization and predictive modeling techniques. While data security concerns and the high cost of implementation pose some restraints, the overall market outlook remains positive, driven by the substantial benefits offered by geospatial analytics in improving efficiency, optimizing resource allocation, and enhancing situational awareness across a wide spectrum of applications. The market segmentation reveals significant opportunities across different types of geospatial analytics (surface analysis, network analysis, and geovisualization) and end-user verticals. While the provided data indicates a significant presence of companies like Harris Corporation, Bentley Systems Inc., and ESRI Inc., the market's competitive landscape is dynamic, with both established players and emerging technology companies vying for market share. The United States' dominance in geospatial technology and data infrastructure further supports the market's projected growth trajectory. The substantial investments in R&D and the prevalence of skilled professionals in the country further contribute to the market's expansion. Looking ahead, the integration of geospatial analytics with other technologies like blockchain and big data is expected to unlock new possibilities, further driving market growth and innovation in the coming years. Recent developments include: May 2023 : CAPE Analytics, a player in AI-powered geospatial property intelligence, has extended its partnership with The Hanover Insurance Group, which provides independent agents with the best insurance coverage and prices. Integrating geospatial analytics and inspection and rating models into Hanover's underwriting procedure is the central component of the partnership expansion. The company's rating plans will benefit from this strategic move, which will improve workflows, new and renewal underwriting outcomes, and pricing segmentation., March 2023 : Carahsoft Technology Corp., The Trusted Government IT Solutions Provider, and Orbital Insight, a player in geospatial intelligence, announced a partnership. By the terms of the agreement, Carahsoft will act as Orbital Insight's Master Government Aggregator, making the leading AI-powered geospatial data analytics available to the public sector through Carahsoft's reseller partners and contracts for Information Technology Enterprise Solutions - Software 2 (ITES-SW2), NASA Solutions for Enterprise-Wide Procurement (SEWP) V, National Association of State Procurement Officials (NASPO) ValuePoint, National Cooperative Purchasing.. Key drivers for this market are: Increasing in Demand for Location Intelligence, Advancements of Big Data Analytics. Potential restraints include: Increasing in Demand for Location Intelligence, Advancements of Big Data Analytics. Notable trends are: Network Analysis is Expected to Hold Significant Share of the Market.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.cognitivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.cognitivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policy
According to Cognitive Market Research, the global geospatial analytics artificial intelligence market size is USD 100.5 million in 2024 and will expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 28.60% from 2024 to 2031.
North America held the major market of more than 40% of the global revenue with a market size of USD 40.20 million in 2024 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 26.8% from 2024 to 2031.
Europe accounted for a share of over 30% of the global market size of USD 30.15 million.
Asia Pacific held the market of around 23% of the global revenue with a market size of USD 23.12 million in 2024 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 30.6% from 2024 to 2031.
Latin America market of more than 5% of the global revenue with a market size of USD 5.03 million in 2024 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 28.0% from 2024 to 2031.
Middle East and Africa held the major market of around 2% of the global revenue with a market size of USD 2.01 million in 2024 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 28.3% from 2024 to 2031.
The remote sensing held the highest geospatial analytics artificial intelligence market revenue share in 2024.
Market Dynamics of Geospatial analytics artificial intelligence Market
Key Drivers for Geospatial analytics artificial intelligence Market
Advancements in AI and Machine Learning to Increase the Demand Globally
The global demand for geospatial analytics is significantly driven by advancements in AI and machine learning, technologies that are revolutionizing how spatial data is analyzed and interpreted. As AI models become more sophisticated, they enhance the capability to automate complex geospatial data processing tasks, leading to more accurate and insightful analyses. Machine learning, particularly, enables systems to improve their accuracy over time by learning from vast datasets of geospatial information, including satellite imagery and sensor data. This leads to more precise predictions and better decision-making across multiple sectors such as environmental management, urban planning, and disaster response. The integration of AI with geospatial technologies not only improves efficiency but also opens up new possibilities for innovation, making it a critical driver for increased global demand in the geospatial analytics market.
Government Initiatives and Support for Smart Cities to Propel Market Growth
Government initiatives supporting the development of smart cities are propelling the growth of the geospatial analytics market. As urban areas around the world transform into smart cities, there is a significant increase in demand for advanced technologies that can analyze and interpret geospatial data to enhance urban planning, infrastructure management, and public safety. Geospatial analytics, powered by AI, plays a crucial role in these projects by enabling real-time data processing and insights for traffic control, utility management, and emergency services coordination. These technologies ensure more efficient resource allocation and improved quality of urban life. Government funding and policy support not only validate the importance of geospatial analytics but also stimulate innovation, attract investments, and foster public-private partnerships, thus driving the market forward and enhancing the capabilities of smart city initiatives globally.
Restraint Factor for the Geospatial analytics artificial intelligence Market
Complexity of Data Integration to Limit the Sales
The complexity of data integration poses a significant barrier to the adoption and effectiveness of geospatial analytics AI systems, potentially limiting sales in this market. Geospatial data, inherently diverse and sourced from various collection methods like satellites, UAVs, and ground sensors, comes in multiple formats and resolutions. Integrating such disparate data into a cohesive, usable format for AI analysis is a challenging process that requires advanced data processing tools and expertise. This complexity not only increases the time and costs associated with project implementation but also raises the risk of errors and inefficiencies in data analysis. Furthermore, the difficulty in achieving seamless integration can deter organizations, particularly those with limited IT capabilities, from investing in geospatial analytics solutions. Overcoming these integration challenges is crucial for enabl...
Facebook
TwitterThis model archive component contains shapefiles of (1) coarse (NHGFv1.1 / NHM) stream network polylines for the Delaware River Basin and (2) fine (NHDPlusV2.1) stream network polylines for six watersheds within the Delaware River Basin.
The parent model archive (Fan et al. 2025a) provides all data, code, and model outputs used in the corresponding manuscript (Fan et al. 2025b) to test machine learning (ML) methods for downscaling and multi-scale modeling of stream temperature to combine an ML model and/or input data at coarse spatial resolution with an ML model and/or input data at fine spatial resolution to predict stream temperatures at fine spatial resolution in a watershed.
The data are organized into these child items:
The publication associated with this model archive is: Fan, Yingda, Runlong Yu, Janet R. Barclay, Alison P. Appling, Yiming Sun, Yiqun Xie, and Xiaowei Jia. 2025. "Multi-Scale Graph Learning for Anti-Sparse Downscaling." In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Vol. 39. Washington, DC, USA: AAAI Press.
This data compilation was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, Environmental System Science Data Management Program, as part of the ExaSheds project, under Award Number 89243021SSC000068. Work was also supported by the U.S. Geological Survey, Water Availability and Use Science Program.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.technavio.com/content/privacy-noticehttps://www.technavio.com/content/privacy-notice
Geographic Information System Analytics Market Size 2024-2028
The geographic information system analytics market size is forecast to increase by USD 12 billion at a CAGR of 12.41% between 2023 and 2028.
The GIS Analytics Market analysis is experiencing significant growth, driven by the increasing need for efficient land management and emerging methods in data collection and generation. The defense industry's reliance on geospatial technology for situational awareness and real-time location monitoring is a major factor fueling market expansion. Additionally, the oil and gas industry's adoption of GIS for resource exploration and management is a key trend. Building Information Modeling (BIM) and smart city initiatives are also contributing to market growth, as they require multiple layered maps for effective planning and implementation. The Internet of Things (IoT) and Software as a Service (SaaS) are transforming GIS analytics by enabling real-time data processing and analysis.
Augmented reality is another emerging trend, as it enhances the user experience and provides valuable insights through visual overlays. Overall, heavy investments are required for setting up GIS stations and accessing data sources, making this a promising market for technology innovators and investors alike.
What will be the Size of the GIS Analytics Market during the forecast period?
Request Free Sample
The geographic information system analytics market encompasses various industries, including government sectors, agriculture, and infrastructure development. Smart city projects, building information modeling, and infrastructure development are key areas driving market growth. Spatial data plays a crucial role in sectors such as transportation, mining, and oil and gas. Cloud technology is transforming GIS analytics by enabling real-time data access and analysis. Startups are disrupting traditional GIS markets with innovative location-based services and smart city planning solutions. Infrastructure development in sectors like construction and green buildings relies on modern GIS solutions for efficient planning and management. Smart utilities and telematics navigation are also leveraging GIS analytics for improved operational efficiency.
GIS technology is essential for zoning and land use management, enabling data-driven decision-making. Smart public works and urban planning projects utilize mapping and geospatial technology for effective implementation. Surveying is another sector that benefits from advanced GIS solutions. Overall, the GIS analytics market is evolving, with a focus on providing actionable insights to businesses and organizations.
How is this Geographic Information System Analytics Industry segmented?
The geographic information system analytics industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD billion' for the period 2024-2028, as well as historical data from 2018-2022 for the following segments.
End-user
Retail and Real Estate
Government
Utilities
Telecom
Manufacturing and Automotive
Agriculture
Construction
Mining
Transportation
Healthcare
Defense and Intelligence
Energy
Education and Research
BFSI
Components
Software
Services
Deployment Modes
On-Premises
Cloud-Based
Applications
Urban and Regional Planning
Disaster Management
Environmental Monitoring Asset Management
Surveying and Mapping
Location-Based Services
Geospatial Business Intelligence
Natural Resource Management
Geography
North America
US
Canada
Europe
France
Germany
UK
APAC
China
India
South Korea
Middle East and Africa
UAE
South America
Brazil
Rest of World
By End-user Insights
The retail and real estate segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.
The GIS analytics market analysis is witnessing significant growth due to the increasing demand for advanced technologies in various industries. In the retail sector, for instance, retailers are utilizing GIS analytics to gain a competitive edge by analyzing customer demographics and buying patterns through real-time location monitoring and multiple layered maps. The retail industry's success relies heavily on these insights for effective marketing strategies. Moreover, the defense industries are integrating GIS analytics into their operations for infrastructure development, permitting, and public safety. Building Information Modeling (BIM) and 4D GIS software are increasingly being adopted for construction project workflows, while urban planning and designing require geospatial data for smart city planning and site selection.
The oil and gas industry is leveraging satellite imaging and IoT devices for land acquisition and mining operations. In the public sector, gover
Facebook
TwitterWell-established conservation planning principles and techniques framed by geodesign were used to assess the restorability of areas that historically supported coastal wetlands along the U.S. shore of western Lake Erie. The resulting analysis supported planning efforts to identify, prioritize, and track wetland restoration opportunity and investment in the region. To accomplish this, publicly available data, criteria derived from the regional managers and local stakeholders, and geospatial analysis were used to form an ecological model for spatial prioritization (Western Lake Erie Restoration Assessmente (WLERA)). Within the 192,618 ha study area that was bounded by the mouths of the Detroit River, MI to the north and the Black River, OH to the south, the model identified and prioritized 6,600 hectares of land most suitable for coastal wetland habitat restoration.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Note: This LCMS CONUS Cause of Change image service has been deprecated. It has been replaced by the LCMS CONUS Annual Change image service, which provides updated and consolidated change data.Please refer to the new service here: https://usfs.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=085626ec50324e5e9ad6323c050ac84dThis product is part of the Landscape Change Monitoring System (LCMS) data suite. It shows LCMS change attribution classes for each year. See additional information about change in the Entity_and_Attribute_Information or Fields section below.LCMS is a remote sensing-based system for mapping and monitoring landscape change across the United States. Its objective is to develop a consistent approach using the latest technology and advancements in change detection to produce a "best available" map of landscape change. Because no algorithm performs best in all situations, LCMS uses an ensemble of models as predictors, which improves map accuracy across a range of ecosystems and change processes (Healey et al., 2018). The resulting suite of LCMS change, land cover, and land use maps offer a holistic depiction of landscape change across the United States over the past four decades.Predictor layers for the LCMS model include outputs from the LandTrendr and CCDC change detection algorithms and terrain information. These components are all accessed and processed using Google Earth Engine (Gorelick et al., 2017). To produce annual composites, the cFmask (Zhu and Woodcock, 2012), cloudScore, and TDOM (Chastain et al., 2019) cloud and cloud shadow masking methods are applied to Landsat Tier 1 and Sentinel 2a and 2b Level-1C top of atmosphere reflectance data. The annual medoid is then computed to summarize each year into a single composite. The composite time series is temporally segmented using LandTrendr (Kennedy et al., 2010; Kennedy et al., 2018; Cohen et al., 2018). All cloud and cloud shadow free values are also temporally segmented using the CCDC algorithm (Zhu and Woodcock, 2014). LandTrendr, CCDC and terrain predictors can be used as independent predictor variables in a Random Forest (Breiman, 2001) model. LandTrendr predictor variables include fitted values, pair-wise differences, segment duration, change magnitude, and slope. CCDC predictor variables include CCDC sine and cosine coefficients (first 3 harmonics), fitted values, and pairwise differences from the Julian Day of each pixel used in the annual composites and LandTrendr. Terrain predictor variables include elevation, slope, sine of aspect, cosine of aspect, and topographic position indices (Weiss, 2001) from the USGS 3D Elevation Program (3DEP) (U.S. Geological Survey, 2019). Reference data are collected using TimeSync, a web-based tool that helps analysts visualize and interpret the Landsat data record from 1984-present (Cohen et al., 2010).Outputs fall into three categories: change, land cover, and land use. Change relates specifically to vegetation cover and includes slow loss (not included for PRUSVI), fast loss (which also includes hydrologic changes such as inundation or desiccation), and gain. These values are predicted for each year of the time series and serve as the foundational products for LCMS. References: Breiman, L. (2001). Random Forests. In Machine Learning (Vol. 45, pp. 5-32). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324Chastain, R., Housman, I., Goldstein, J., Finco, M., and Tenneson, K. (2019). Empirical cross sensor comparison of Sentinel-2A and 2B MSI, Landsat-8 OLI, and Landsat-7 ETM top of atmosphere spectral characteristics over the conterminous United States. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 221, pp. 274-285). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.11.012Cohen, W. B., Yang, Z., and Kennedy, R. (2010). Detecting trends in forest disturbance and recovery using yearly Landsat time series: 2. TimeSync - Tools for calibration and validation. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 114, Issue 12, pp. 2911-2924). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.07.010Cohen, W. B., Yang, Z., Healey, S. P., Kennedy, R. E., and Gorelick, N. (2018). A LandTrendr multispectral ensemble for forest disturbance detection. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 205, pp. 131-140). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.11.015Foga, S., Scaramuzza, P.L., Guo, S., Zhu, Z., Dilley, R.D., Beckmann, T., Schmidt, G.L., Dwyer, J.L., Hughes, M.J., Laue, B. (2017). Cloud detection algorithm comparison and validation for operational Landsat data products. Remote Sensing of Environment, 194, 379-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.03.026Gorelick, N., Hancher, M., Dixon, M., Ilyushchenko, S., Thau, D., and Moore, R. (2017). Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 202, pp. 18-27). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031Healey, S. P., Cohen, W. B., Yang, Z., Kenneth Brewer, C., Brooks, E. B., Gorelick, N., Hernandez, A. J., Huang, C., Joseph Hughes, M., Kennedy, R. E., Loveland, T. R., Moisen, G. G., Schroeder, T. A., Stehman, S. V., Vogelmann, J. E., Woodcock, C. E., Yang, L., and Zhu, Z. (2018). Mapping forest change using stacked generalization: An ensemble approach. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 204, pp. 717-728). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.09.029Kennedy, R. E., Yang, Z., and Cohen, W. B. (2010). Detecting trends in forest disturbance and recovery using yearly Landsat time series: 1. LandTrendr - Temporal segmentation algorithms. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 114, Issue 12, pp. 2897-2910). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.07.008Kennedy, R., Yang, Z., Gorelick, N., Braaten, J., Cavalcante, L., Cohen, W., and Healey, S. (2018). Implementation of the LandTrendr Algorithm on Google Earth Engine. In Remote Sensing (Vol. 10, Issue 5, p. 691). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10050691Olofsson, P., Foody, G. M., Herold, M., Stehman, S. V., Woodcock, C. E., and Wulder, M. A. (2014). Good practices for estimating area and assessing accuracy of land change. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 148, pp. 42-57). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.02.015Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M. and Duchesnay, E. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. In Journal of Machine Learning Research (Vol. 12, pp. 2825-2830).Pengra, B. W., Stehman, S. V., Horton, J. A., Dockter, D. J., Schroeder, T. A., Yang, Z., Cohen, W. B., Healey, S. P., and Loveland, T. R. (2020). Quality control and assessment of interpreter consistency of annual land cover reference data in an operational national monitoring program. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 238, p. 111261). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111261U.S. Geological Survey. (2019). USGS 3D Elevation Program Digital Elevation Model, accessed August 2022 at https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/USGS_3DEP_10mWeiss, A.D. (2001). Topographic position and landforms analysis Poster Presentation, ESRI Users Conference, San Diego, CAZhu, Z., and Woodcock, C. E. (2012). Object-based cloud and cloud shadow detection in Landsat imagery. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 118, pp. 83-94). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.10.028Zhu, Z., and Woodcock, C. E. (2014). Continuous change detection and classification of land cover using all available Landsat data. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 144, pp. 152-171). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.01.011This record was taken from the USDA Enterprise Data Inventory that feeds into the https://data.gov catalog. Data for this record includes the following resources: ISO-19139 metadata ArcGIS Hub Dataset ArcGIS GeoService For complete information, please visit https://data.gov.
Facebook
TwitterThis geospatial dataset provides model-based predictive maps of subsistence land use in rural Interior Alaska. Subsistence harvesting of wild resources is crucial to the well-being of Alaska Natives and rural Alaskans. The development of these community and regional scale maps was intended to improve our understanding of the spatial extent and patterns of subsistence practices, to support communication among land users, and to facilitate predictions of the human impacts from changes in resource availability, climate and environment, land use, and policy. Logistic regression models for predicting subsistence land use were developed using publicly-available maps of documented subsistence use areas assembled by Alaska Department of Fish and Game for 30 communities (Neufeld et al. 2019). Separate models were used for remote communities and road-connected communities. The best-fit models of subsistence land use probability included the terms: distance to community, distance to main travel corridors (rivers for remote communities; roads and rivers for road-connected communities), distance to lakes (for remote communities only), and community population size. The models were applied to 64 rural communities throughout the Interior region to generate probability maps of subsistence land use at the community level (file names: probability_subsistence_*communitytype*_*CommunityName*.tif). A regional probability map of subsistence land use was constructed using the maximum probability value per pixel from community-level maps (file name: probability_subsistence_InteriorAK.tif). Maps of predicted subsistence use areas were created by classifying the community-level probability maps into used and unused areas (file name: classification_subsistence_InteriorAK.zip). Classification accuracy ranged from 83-86%. Results suggest a large spatial extent (353,771 square kilometers (km2)) of subsistence land use in Interior Alaska, comprising ~60% of the region’s land area. These data were produced as part of a study “Geospatial patterns and models of subsistence land use in rural Interior Alaska” by D. R. N. Brown, T. J. Brinkman, G. Neufeld, L. Navarro, C. L. Brown, H. S. Cold, B. L. Woods, and B. L. Ervin currently in review with Ecology and Society (Brown et al., in review).
Facebook
TwitterThis geospatial dataset provides model-based predictive maps of subsistence land use in rural Interior Alaska. Subsistence harvesting of wild resources is crucial to the well-being of Alaska Natives and rural Alaskans. The development of these community and regional scale maps was intended to improve our understanding of the spatial extent and patterns of subsistence practices, to support communication among land users, and to facilitate predictions of the human impacts from changes in resource availability, climate and environment, land use, and policy. Logistic regression models for predicting subsistence land use were developed using publicly-available maps of documented subsistence use areas assembled by Alaska Department of Fish and Game for 30 communities (Neufeld et al. 2019). Separate models were used for remote communities and road-connected communities. The best-fit models of subsistence land use probability included the terms: distance to community, distance to main travel corridors (rivers for remote communities; roads and rivers for road-connected communities), distance to lakes (for remote communities only), and community population size. The models were applied to 64 rural communities throughout the Interior region to generate probability maps of subsistence land use at the community level (file names: probability_subsistence_*communitytype*_*CommunityName*.tif). A regional probability map of subsistence land use was constructed using the maximum probability value per pixel from community-level maps (file name: probability_subsistence_InteriorAK.tif). Maps of predicted subsistence use areas were created by classifying the community-level probability maps into used and unused areas (file name: classification_subsistence_InteriorAK.zip). Classification accuracy ranged from 83-86%. Results suggest a large spatial extent (353,771 square kilometers (km2)) of subsistence land use in Interior Alaska, comprising ~60% of the region’s land area. These data were produced as part of a study “Geospatial patterns and models of subsistence land use in rural Interior Alaska” by D. R. N. Brown, T. J. Brinkman, G. Neufeld, L. Navarro, C. L. Brown, H. S. Cold, B. L. Woods, and B. L. Ervin published with Ecology and Society (Brown et al., 2022), https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol27/iss2/art23/.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Species distribution models (SDMs) are tools that combine species observations of occurrence, abundance, or biomass with environmental variables to predict the distribution of a species in unsampled locations. To produce accurate predictions of occurrence, abundance or biomass distribution, a wide range of physical and/or biological variables is desirable. Such data is often collected over limited or irregular spatial scales, and require the application of geospatial techniques to produce continuous environmental surfaces that can be used for modelling at all spatial scales. Here we provide a review of 102 environmental data layers that were compiled for the entire spatial extent of Fisheries and Oceans Canada’s (DFO) Maritimes Region. Variables were obtained from a broad range of physical and biological data sources and spatially interpolated using geostatistical methods. For each variable we document the underlying data distribution, provide relevant diagnostics of the interpolation models and an assessment of model performance, and present the final standard error and interpolation surfaces. These layers have been archived in a common (raster) format at the Bedford Institute of Oceanography to facilitate future use. Based on the diagnostic summaries in this report, a subset of these variables has subsequently been used in species distribution models to predict the distribution of deep-water corals, sponges, and other significant benthic taxa in the Maritimes Region.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Data sets used in the analysis of OpenStreetMap data quality issues, as indicated by OSM Contributors themselves, using the FIXME Feature Tag. Text Mining and Knowledge Exposition was done using Topic Models and Latent Labelled Dirichlet Allocation (L-LDA) algorithm. The data sets are taken from OSM North America and Australia and the text corpus processed in a format that is suitable to be used for L-LDA.
Facebook
TwitterIn this study, an integrated risk-modelling approach for estimating tropical cyclone impacts under present and future climate change scenarios using remote sensing, field data and spatial analysis was developed. The geospatial linear storm-surge models, and the resultant storm-surge models were used in the risk-modelling procedures. The storm-surge models were validated by a two-dimensional hydrodynamic model. The study demonstrated a simple and effective way for modelling detailed tropical cyclone risk information using geospatial techniques under present and future climate change scenarios at the local scale. The geospatial techniques were found potentially effective for providing essential input spatial information under the current approach.
Facebook
TwitterData files for "Eccles KM, Karmaus AL, Kleinstreuer NC, Parham F, Rider CV, Wambaugh JF, Messier KP. A geospatial modeling approach to quantifying the risk of exposure to environmental chemical mixtures via a common molecular target. Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jan 10;855:158905. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158905. Epub 2022 Sep 21. PMID: 36152849"