100+ datasets found
  1. e

    List of Top Authors of Geospatial Technology and the Role of Location in...

    • exaly.com
    csv, json
    Updated Nov 1, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2025). List of Top Authors of Geospatial Technology and the Role of Location in Science sorted by articles [Dataset]. https://exaly.com/journal/32326/geospatial-technology-and-the-role-of-location-i/prolific-authors
    Explore at:
    csv, jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 1, 2025
    License

    Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    List of Top Authors of Geospatial Technology and the Role of Location in Science sorted by articles.

  2. CanopyHeight multiYear USFS R3 Southwest multiRes Public

    • agdatacommons.nal.usda.gov
    • gimi9.com
    • +6more
    bin
    Updated Apr 22, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Forest Service (2025). CanopyHeight multiYear USFS R3 Southwest multiRes Public [Dataset]. https://agdatacommons.nal.usda.gov/articles/dataset/CanopyHeight_multiYear_USFS_R3_Southwest_multiRes_Public/28836542
    Explore at:
    binAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 22, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Servicehttp://fs.fed.us/
    Authors
    U.S. Forest Service
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This is a collection of Canopy Height rasters covering selected U.S. Forest Service and adjoining lands in the Southwest Region, encompassing Arizona and New Mexico. The data are presented in a time-enabled format, allowing the end-user to view available data year-by-year, or all available years at once, within a GIS system. The data encompass varying years, varying resolutions, and varying geographic extents, dependent upon available data as provided by the region. The data represents the height of vegetation above ground, measured in meters.The data contains an attribute table. Notable attributes that may be of interest to an end-user are:lowps: the pixel size of the source raster, given in meters.highps: the pixel size of the top-most pyramid for the raster, given in meters.beginyear: the first year of data acquisition for an individual dataset.endyear: the final year of data acquisition for an individual dataset.dataset_name: the name of the individual dataset within the collection.metadata: A URL link to a file on IIPP's Portal containing metadata pertaining to an individual dataset within the image service.resolution: The pixel size of the source raster, given in meters.Canopy Height data are primarily derived from Lidar datasets. Consequently, these derivatives inherit the limitations and uncertainties of the parent sensor and platform and the processing techniques used to produce the imagery. The images are orthographic; they have been georeferenced and displacement due to sensor orientation and topography have been removed, producing data that combines the characteristics of an image with the geometric qualities of a map. The orthographic images show ground features in their proper positions, without the distortion characteristic of unrectified aerial or satellite imagery. Digital orthoimages produced and used within the Forest Service are developed from imagery acquired through various national and regional image acquisition programs. The resulting orthoimages can be directly applied in remote sensing, GIS and mapping applications. They serve a variety of purposes, from interim maps to references for Earth science investigations and analysis. Because of the orthographic property, an orthoimage can be used like a map for measurement of distances, angles, and areas with scale being constant everywhere. Also, they can be used as map layers in GIS or other computer-based manipulation, overlaying, and analysis. An orthoimage differs from a map in a manner of depiction of detail; on a map only selected detail is shown by conventional symbols whereas on an orthoimage all details appear just as in original aerial or satellite imagery.Tribal lands have been masked from this public service in accordance with Tribal agreements.This record was taken from the USDA Enterprise Data Inventory that feeds into the https://data.gov catalog. Data for this record includes the following resources: ISO-19139 metadata ArcGIS Hub Dataset ArcGIS GeoService For complete information, please visit https://data.gov.

  3. USDA Forest Service Geospatial Technology and Applications Center (GTAC)

    • agdatacommons.nal.usda.gov
    bin
    Updated Nov 22, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    USDA Forest Service (2025). USDA Forest Service Geospatial Technology and Applications Center (GTAC) [Dataset]. https://agdatacommons.nal.usda.gov/articles/dataset/USDA_Forest_Service_Geospatial_Technology_and_Applications_Center_GTAC_/24661923
    Explore at:
    binAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 22, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Servicehttp://fs.fed.us/
    Authors
    USDA Forest Service
    License

    U.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The Forest Service's Remote Sensing Applications Center (RSAC) is in Salt Lake City, Utah, co-located with the agency's Geospatial Service and Technology Center. Guided by national steering committees and field sponsors, RSAC provides national assistance to agency field units in applying the most advanced geospatial technology toward improved monitoring and mapping of natural resources. RSAC's principal goal is to develop and implement less costly ways for the Forest Service to obtain needed forest resource information. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: GTAC External Products, Data and Services. File Name: Web Page, url: https://www.fs.usda.gov/about-agency/gtac These are examples of the work we are involved in. Contact us if you're interested in learning more. Data and Services: Forest Service Base Map Products, Insect and Disease Area Designations, National Land Cover Database, Tree Canopy Cover, Landscape Change Monitoring System, Terrestrial Ecological Unit Inventory (TEUI) and GTAC TEUI Toolkit, Orthomosaicking Historical Aerial Photography Scans

  4. f

    Data Sheet 1_Integration of geospatial technology and AHP model for...

    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    • figshare.com
    pdf
    Updated Oct 21, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Zenhom E. Salem; Ayman M. Al Temamy; Tamer S. Abu‐Alam; Mona A. Mesallam; Amr S. Fahil (2025). Data Sheet 1_Integration of geospatial technology and AHP model for assessing groundwater potentiality in Arid Regions: a case study in Wadi Araba Basin, Western Coast of Gulf of Suez, Egypt.pdf [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2025.1670000.s001
    Explore at:
    pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 21, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers
    Authors
    Zenhom E. Salem; Ayman M. Al Temamy; Tamer S. Abu‐Alam; Mona A. Mesallam; Amr S. Fahil
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Egypt, Gulf of Suez
    Description

    IntroductionIn arid regions such as Wadi Araba, Egypt, water scarcity is a significant challenge, driven by the complex hydrogeological settings and limited field data, all while demand continues to grow for water for domestic, agricultural, and industrial needs. Additionally, the basin flows westward into the Gulf of Suez, generating a slight deltaic fan connecting inland recharge movement with coastal sedimentary and hydrological activities.MethodsThe groundwater recharge potential in Wadi Araba was mapped using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) within a GIS framework, which is the research objective. Using ArcGIS 10.8, ten thematic layers were weighted and combined to create a groundwater potential map that shows how surface, climate, and structure affect it.ResultsThe study revealed that Wadi Araba has three distinct categories of groundwater potential: low (28.45%) in the northern and southern zones, intermediate (56.9%) in the middle and western sections, and high (14.65%) in the northeastern basin near the Gulf of Suez. These patterns match up with changes in slope, soil permeability, rainfall, and the number of structural elements like drainage and lineaments. Finally, ROC -AUC analysis using 13 field-verified locations was used to check the accuracy of the derived zones, and the results indicated that the prediction accuracy was 78.7%. Accordingly, accessible sites are groundwater indicators in this arid area with few wells and springs.DiscussionThis study is the first to use an AHP-GIS-based method to map the potential for groundwater in Wadi Araba, Egypt. The results provide an excellent basis for planning sustainable groundwater use in similar arid regions with little field data.

  5. Refugee camps.

    • plos.figshare.com
    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    xls
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ron Mahabir; Arie Croitoru; Andrew Crooks; Peggy Agouris; Anthony Stefanidis (2023). Refugee camps. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206825.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Ron Mahabir; Arie Croitoru; Andrew Crooks; Peggy Agouris; Anthony Stefanidis
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Refugee camps.

  6. South Korea Geospatial Analytics Market Size By Component (Solution,...

    • verifiedmarketresearch.com
    pdf,excel,csv,ppt
    Updated Jun 15, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Verified Market Research (2025). South Korea Geospatial Analytics Market Size By Component (Solution, Service), By Type (Surface and Field Analytics, Network and Location Analytics), By Deployment Mode (On-Premise, Cloud), By Organization Size (Large Enterprises, Small & Medium Enterprises), By End-User (Mining and Manufacturing, Government), By Geographic Scope And Forecast [Dataset]. https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/product/south-korea-geospatial-analytics-market/
    Explore at:
    pdf,excel,csv,pptAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 15, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Verified Market Researchhttps://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/
    License

    https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/privacy-policy/https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/privacy-policy/

    Time period covered
    2026 - 2032
    Area covered
    South Korea, Asia Pacific
    Description

    South Korea Geospatial Analytics Market size was valued at USD 970 Million in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 1953 Million by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 9.1% from 2026 to 2032. Key Market Drivers:Rising Government Investments in Smart City Development: The South Korea geospatial analytics market is experiencing strong growth due to increasing government funding for smart city infrastructure and digital transformation. According to the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (2023), South Korea allocated 1.2 Trillion (USD 900 Million) for smart city projects leveraging geospatial data. Key players like SK Telecom and LG CNS have developed AI-powered geospatial platforms for urban planning. In 2024, Naver Labs launched a 3D digital twin solution for Seoul, enhancing real-time spatial analytics. Recent news highlights Samsung SDS’s partnership with local governments to integrate geospatial AI into traffic and disaster management systems.Growing Demand for Location-Based Services in Retail & Logistics: The rapid expansion of e-commerce and last-mile delivery services is driving adoption of geospatial analytics for route optimization and customer targeting. A 2023 Korea Statistics Bureau report revealed that over 65% of logistics firms now use geospatial data for fleet management. Companies like Coupang and Baemin are implementing real-time tracking systems powered by Google Maps Platform and Kakao Mobility. In early 2024, KT (Korea Telecom) introduced an AI-driven logistics analytics tool to reduce delivery times. Recent developments include Lotte Data Communication’s geofencing solutions for personalized retail marketing.Increasing Use of Geospatial Tech in Autonomous Vehicles & Drones: The push toward autonomous mobility and drone delivery is accelerating demand for high-precision geospatial mapping and analytics. The Korean Ministry of Science and ICT (2024) reported that autonomous vehicle testing zones expanded by 30% in 2023, requiring advanced spatial data. Hyundai’s Motional and Kia are collaborating with TomTom and HERE Technologies for HD mapping. In 2024, Kakao Mobility launched a drone delivery pilot in Seoul using real-time geospatial analytics. Recent news highlights Hanwha Systems’ AI-based geospatial platform for military and civilian drone operations.

  7. DSM MultiYear USFS R3 Southwest multiRes Public

    • agdatacommons.nal.usda.gov
    • catalog.data.gov
    • +3more
    bin
    Updated Nov 24, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Forest Service (2025). DSM MultiYear USFS R3 Southwest multiRes Public [Dataset]. https://agdatacommons.nal.usda.gov/articles/dataset/DSM_MultiYear_USFS_R3_Southwest_multiRes_Public/28836539
    Explore at:
    binAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 24, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Servicehttp://fs.fed.us/
    Authors
    U.S. Forest Service
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This is a collection of Digital Surface Models and Highest Hit rasters covering selected U.S. Forest Service and adjoining lands in the Southwest Region, encompassing Arizona and New Mexico. The data are presented in a time-enabled format, allowing the end-user to view available data year-by-year, or all available years at once, within a GIS system. The data encompass varying years, varying resolutions, and varying geographic extents, dependent upon available data as provided by the region. DSM and Highest Hit rasters represent elevation of Earth's surface, including its natural and human-made features, such as vegetation and buildings.The data contains an attribute table. Notable attributes that may be of interest to an end-user are:lowps: the pixel size of the source raster, given in meters.highps: the pixel size of the top-most pyramid for the raster, given in meters.beginyear: the first year of data acquisition for an individual dataset.endyear: the final year of data acquisition for an individual dataset.dataset_name: the name of the individual dataset within the collection.metadata: A URL link to a file on IIPP's Portal containing metadata pertaining to an individual dataset within the image service.resolution: The pixel size of the source raster, given in meters.Terrain-related imagery are primarily derived from Lidar, stereoscopic aerial imagery, or Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar datasets. Consequently, these derivatives inherit the limitations and uncertainties of the parent sensor and platform and the processing techniques used to produce the imagery. The terrain images are orthographic; they have been georeferenced and displacement due to sensor orientation and topography have been removed, producing data that combines the characteristics of an image with the geometric qualities of a map. The orthographic images show ground features in their proper positions, without the distortion characteristic of unrectified aerial or satellite imagery. Digital orthoimages produced and used within the Forest Service are developed from imagery acquired through various national and regional image acquisition programs. The resulting orthoimages can be directly applied in remote sensing, GIS and mapping applications. They serve a variety of purposes, from interim maps to references for Earth science investigations and analysis. Because of the orthographic property, an orthoimage can be used like a map for measurement of distances, angles, and areas with scale being constant everywhere. Also, they can be used as map layers in GIS or other computer-based manipulation, overlaying, and analysis. An orthoimage differs from a map in a manner of depiction of detail; on a map only selected detail is shown by conventional symbols whereas on an orthoimage all details appear just as in original aerial or satellite imagery.Tribal lands have been masked from this public service in accordance with Tribal agreements.This record was taken from the USDA Enterprise Data Inventory that feeds into the https://data.gov catalog. Data for this record includes the following resources: ISO-19139 metadata ArcGIS Hub Dataset ArcGIS GeoService For complete information, please visit https://data.gov.

  8. u

    NEWT: National Extension Web-mapping Tool

    • agdatacommons.nal.usda.gov
    bin
    Updated Nov 21, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Cooperative Extension System; Virginia Tech Center for Geospatial Information Technology (2025). NEWT: National Extension Web-mapping Tool [Dataset]. https://agdatacommons.nal.usda.gov/articles/dataset/NEWT_National_Extension_Web-mapping_Tool/24852795
    Explore at:
    binAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 21, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Cooperative Extension System
    Authors
    Cooperative Extension System; Virginia Tech Center for Geospatial Information Technology
    License

    U.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    eXtension Foundation, the University of New Hampshire, and Virginia Tech have developed a mapping and data exploration tool to assist Cooperative Extension staff and administrators in making strategic planning and programming decisions. The tool, called the National Extension Web-mapping Tool (or NEWT), is the key in efforts to make spatial data available within cooperative extension system. NEWT requires no GIS experience to use. NEWT provides access for CES staff and administrators to relevant spatial data at a variety of scales (national, state, county) in useful formats (maps, tables, graphs), all without the need for any experience or technical skills in Geographic Information System (GIS) software. By providing consistent access to relevant spatial data throughout the country in a format useful to CES staff and administrators, NEWT represents a significant advancement for the use of spatial technology in CES. Users of the site will be able to discover the data layers which are of most interest to them by making simple, guided choices about topics related to their work. Once the relevant data layers have been chosen, a mapping interface will allow the exploration of spatial relationships and the creation and export of maps. Extension areas to filter searches include 4-H Youth & Family, Agriculture, Business, Community, Food & Health, and Natural Resources. Users will also be able to explore data by viewing data tables and graphs. This Beta release is open for public use and feedback. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Website Pointer to NEWT National Extension Web-mapping Tool Beta. File Name: Web Page, url: https://www.mapasyst.org/newt/ The site leads the user through the process of selecting the data in which they would be most interested, then provides a variety of ways for the user to explore the data (maps, graphs, tables).

  9. News coverage, digital activism, and geographical saliency: A case study of...

    • plos.figshare.com
    docx
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ron Mahabir; Arie Croitoru; Andrew Crooks; Peggy Agouris; Anthony Stefanidis (2023). News coverage, digital activism, and geographical saliency: A case study of refugee camps and volunteered geographical information [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206825
    Explore at:
    docxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Ron Mahabir; Arie Croitoru; Andrew Crooks; Peggy Agouris; Anthony Stefanidis
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The last several decades have witnessed a shift in the way in which news is delivered and consumed by users. With the growth and advancements in mobile technologies, the Internet, and Web 2.0 technologies users are not only consumers of news, but also producers of online content. This has resulted in a novel and highly participatory cyber-physical news awareness ecosystem that fosters digital activism, in which volunteers contribute content to online communities. While studies have examined the various components of this news awareness ecosystem, little is still known about how news media coverage (and in particular digital media) impacts digital activism. In order to address this challenge and develop a greater understanding of it, this paper focuses on a specific form of digital activism, that of the production of digital geographical content through crowdsourcing efforts. Using refugee camps from around the world as a case study, we examine the relationship between news coverage (via Google news), search trends (via Google trends) and user edit contribution patterns in OpenStreetMap, a prominent geospatial data crowdsourcing platform. In addition, we compare and contrast these patterns with user edit patterns in Wikipedia, a well-known non-geospatial crowdsourcing platform. Using Google news and Google trends to derive a measure of thematic public awareness, our findings indicate that digital activism bursts tend to take place during periods of sustained build-up of public awareness deficit or surplus. These findings are in line with two prominent mass communication theories: agenda setting and corrective action, and suggest the emergence of a novel stimulus-awareness-activism framework in today’s participatory digital age. Moreover, these findings further complement existing research examining the motivational factors that drive users to contribute to online collaborative communities. This paper brings us one step closer to understanding the underlying mechanisms that drive digital activism in particular in the geospatial domain.

  10. Data from: MyGeoHub Geospatial Gateway

    • figshare.com
    • search.datacite.org
    pdf
    Updated Oct 26, 2017
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Rajesh Kalyanam; Lan Zhao; Robert Campbell; Derrick Kearney; I Luk Kim; Jaewoo Shin; Larry Biehl; Wei Wan; Carol X. Song (2017). MyGeoHub Geospatial Gateway [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5422825.v2
    Explore at:
    pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 26, 2017
    Dataset provided by
    Figsharehttp://figshare.com/
    figshare
    Authors
    Rajesh Kalyanam; Lan Zhao; Robert Campbell; Derrick Kearney; I Luk Kim; Jaewoo Shin; Larry Biehl; Wei Wan; Carol X. Song
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    MyGeoHub is a science gateway for researchers working with geospatial data. Based on the HUBzero cyberinfrastructure framework, it provides general-purpose software modules enabling geospatial data management, processing and visualization. Termed “GABBs” (Geospatial Data Analysis Building Blocks), these modules can be leveraged to build geospatial data driven tools with minimal programming and construct dynamic workflows chaining both local and remote tools and data sources. We will present examples of such end-to-end workflows demonstrating the underlying software building blocks that have also found use beyond the MyGeoHub gateway in other science domains.

  11. BareEarthDEM multiYear USFS R3 Southwest multiRes Public

    • agdatacommons.nal.usda.gov
    • catalog.data.gov
    • +3more
    bin
    Updated Nov 24, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Forest Service (2025). BareEarthDEM multiYear USFS R3 Southwest multiRes Public [Dataset]. https://agdatacommons.nal.usda.gov/articles/dataset/BareEarthDEM_multiYear_USFS_R3_Southwest_multiRes_Public/28836527
    Explore at:
    binAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 24, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Servicehttp://fs.fed.us/
    Authors
    U.S. Forest Service
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This is a collection of bare-Earth digital elevation models covering selected U.S. Forest Service and adjoining lands in the Southwest Region, encompassing Arizona and New Mexico. The data are presented in a time-enabled format, allowing the end-user to view available data year-by-year, or all available years at once, within a GIS system. The data encompass varying years, varying resolutions, and varying geographic extents, dependent upon available data as provided by the region. Bare-Earth DEMs, also commonly called Digital Terrain Models (DTM), represent the ground topography after removal of persistent objects such as vegetation and buildings, and therefore show the natural terrain.The data contains an attribute table. Notable attributes that may be of interest to an end-user are:lowps: the pixel size of the source raster, given in meters.highps: the pixel size of the top-most pyramid for the raster, given in meters.beginyear: the first year of data acquisition for an individual dataset.endyear: the final year of data acquisition for an individual dataset.dataset_name: the name of the individual dataset within the collection.metadata: A URL link to a file on IIPP's Portal containing metadata pertaining to an individual dataset within the image service.resolution: The pixel size of the source raster, given in meters.Terrain-related imagery are primarily derived from Lidar, stereoscopic aerial imagery, or Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar datasets. Consequently, these derivatives inherit the limitations and uncertainties of the parent sensor and platform and the processing techniques used to produce the imagery. The terrain images are orthographic; they have been georeferenced and displacement due to sensor orientation and topography have been removed, producing data that combines the characteristics of an image with the geometric qualities of a map. The orthographic images show ground features in their proper positions, without the distortion characteristic of unrectified aerial or satellite imagery. Digital orthoimages produced and used within the Forest Service are developed from imagery acquired through various national and regional image acquisition programs. The resulting orthoimages can be directly applied in remote sensing, GIS and mapping applications. They serve a variety of purposes, from interim maps to references for Earth science investigations and analysis. Because of the orthographic property, an orthoimage can be used like a map for measurement of distances, angles, and areas with scale being constant everywhere. Also, they can be used as map layers in GIS or other computer-based manipulation, overlaying, and analysis. An orthoimage differs from a map in a manner of depiction of detail; on a map only selected detail is shown by conventional symbols whereas on an orthoimage all details appear just as in original aerial or satellite imagery.Tribal lands have been masked from this public service in accordance with Tribal agreements.This record was taken from the USDA Enterprise Data Inventory that feeds into the https://data.gov catalog. Data for this record includes the following resources: ISO-19139 metadata ArcGIS Hub Dataset ArcGIS GeoService For complete information, please visit https://data.gov.

  12. u

    PetaJakarta.org Major Open Data Collection - Twitter activity related to...

    • ro.uow.edu.au
    • researchdata.edu.au
    Updated Nov 16, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Stephen Turpin; Tomas du Chemin Holderness (2024). PetaJakarta.org Major Open Data Collection - Twitter activity related to flooding in Jakarta, Indonesia [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.4225/48/5539d13f4a007
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 16, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    University of Wollongong
    Authors
    Stephen Turpin; Tomas du Chemin Holderness
    License

    Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Jakarta, Indonesia
    Description

    Counts of geolocated tweets containing the word ‘flood’ or ‘banjir’ within the city of Jakarta, Indonesia for the 2014/2015 monsoon season. Counts were created within ‘RW’ municipal areas at hourly intervals, and include confirmed reports of flooding sent by members of the public to the @petajkt twitter account, as well as other unconfirmed tweets which match specified keywords. Keyword matching is based on substring pattern matching, and so can include tweets where a keyword is part of another word or hashtag. Data captured between 01/12/2014 - 31/03/2015

  13. u

    Smart city development and urban technologies : digital twin in cities

    • researchdata.up.ac.za
    pdf
    Updated Nov 21, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Tana Greyling (2024). Smart city development and urban technologies : digital twin in cities [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.25403/UPresearchdata.25055501.v1
    Explore at:
    pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 21, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    University of Pretoria
    Authors
    Tana Greyling
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This research study considers one such urban technology, namely utilising digital twins in cities. Digital twin city (DTC) technology is investigated to identify the gap in soft infrastructure data inclusion in DTC development. Soft infrastructure data considers the social and economic systems of a city, which leads to the identification of socio-economic security (SES) as the metric of investigation. The study also investigated how GIS mapping of the SES system in the specific context of Hatfield informs a soft infrastructure understanding that contributes to DTC readiness. This research study collected desk-researched secondary data and field-researched primary data in GIS using ArcGIS PRO and the Esri Online Platform using ArcGIS software. To form conclusions, grounded theory qualitative analysis and descriptive statistics analysis of the spatial GIS data schema data sets were performed.

  14. Summary of the time gap values derived at the monthly, weekly, and daily...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ron Mahabir; Arie Croitoru; Andrew Crooks; Peggy Agouris; Anthony Stefanidis (2023). Summary of the time gap values derived at the monthly, weekly, and daily levels for OSM and Wikipedia. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206825.t004
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Ron Mahabir; Arie Croitoru; Andrew Crooks; Peggy Agouris; Anthony Stefanidis
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Summary of the time gap values derived at the monthly, weekly, and daily levels for OSM and Wikipedia.

  15. u

    Landscape Change Monitoring System (LCMS) Conterminous United States Cause...

    • agdatacommons.nal.usda.gov
    • catalog.data.gov
    • +4more
    bin
    Updated Oct 23, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Forest Service (2025). Landscape Change Monitoring System (LCMS) Conterminous United States Cause of Change (Image Service) [Dataset]. https://agdatacommons.nal.usda.gov/articles/dataset/Landscape_Change_Monitoring_System_LCMS_CONUS_Cause_of_Change_Image_Service_/26885563
    Explore at:
    binAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 23, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    U.S. Forest Service
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Note: This LCMS CONUS Cause of Change image service has been deprecated. It has been replaced by the LCMS CONUS Annual Change image service, which provides updated and consolidated change data.Please refer to the new service here: https://usfs.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=085626ec50324e5e9ad6323c050ac84dThis product is part of the Landscape Change Monitoring System (LCMS) data suite. It shows LCMS change attribution classes for each year. See additional information about change in the Entity_and_Attribute_Information or Fields section below.LCMS is a remote sensing-based system for mapping and monitoring landscape change across the United States. Its objective is to develop a consistent approach using the latest technology and advancements in change detection to produce a "best available" map of landscape change. Because no algorithm performs best in all situations, LCMS uses an ensemble of models as predictors, which improves map accuracy across a range of ecosystems and change processes (Healey et al., 2018). The resulting suite of LCMS change, land cover, and land use maps offer a holistic depiction of landscape change across the United States over the past four decades.Predictor layers for the LCMS model include outputs from the LandTrendr and CCDC change detection algorithms and terrain information. These components are all accessed and processed using Google Earth Engine (Gorelick et al., 2017). To produce annual composites, the cFmask (Zhu and Woodcock, 2012), cloudScore, and TDOM (Chastain et al., 2019) cloud and cloud shadow masking methods are applied to Landsat Tier 1 and Sentinel 2a and 2b Level-1C top of atmosphere reflectance data. The annual medoid is then computed to summarize each year into a single composite. The composite time series is temporally segmented using LandTrendr (Kennedy et al., 2010; Kennedy et al., 2018; Cohen et al., 2018). All cloud and cloud shadow free values are also temporally segmented using the CCDC algorithm (Zhu and Woodcock, 2014). LandTrendr, CCDC and terrain predictors can be used as independent predictor variables in a Random Forest (Breiman, 2001) model. LandTrendr predictor variables include fitted values, pair-wise differences, segment duration, change magnitude, and slope. CCDC predictor variables include CCDC sine and cosine coefficients (first 3 harmonics), fitted values, and pairwise differences from the Julian Day of each pixel used in the annual composites and LandTrendr. Terrain predictor variables include elevation, slope, sine of aspect, cosine of aspect, and topographic position indices (Weiss, 2001) from the USGS 3D Elevation Program (3DEP) (U.S. Geological Survey, 2019). Reference data are collected using TimeSync, a web-based tool that helps analysts visualize and interpret the Landsat data record from 1984-present (Cohen et al., 2010).Outputs fall into three categories: change, land cover, and land use. Change relates specifically to vegetation cover and includes slow loss (not included for PRUSVI), fast loss (which also includes hydrologic changes such as inundation or desiccation), and gain. These values are predicted for each year of the time series and serve as the foundational products for LCMS. References: Breiman, L. (2001). Random Forests. In Machine Learning (Vol. 45, pp. 5-32). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324Chastain, R., Housman, I., Goldstein, J., Finco, M., and Tenneson, K. (2019). Empirical cross sensor comparison of Sentinel-2A and 2B MSI, Landsat-8 OLI, and Landsat-7 ETM top of atmosphere spectral characteristics over the conterminous United States. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 221, pp. 274-285). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.11.012Cohen, W. B., Yang, Z., and Kennedy, R. (2010). Detecting trends in forest disturbance and recovery using yearly Landsat time series: 2. TimeSync - Tools for calibration and validation. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 114, Issue 12, pp. 2911-2924). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.07.010Cohen, W. B., Yang, Z., Healey, S. P., Kennedy, R. E., and Gorelick, N. (2018). A LandTrendr multispectral ensemble for forest disturbance detection. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 205, pp. 131-140). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.11.015Foga, S., Scaramuzza, P.L., Guo, S., Zhu, Z., Dilley, R.D., Beckmann, T., Schmidt, G.L., Dwyer, J.L., Hughes, M.J., Laue, B. (2017). Cloud detection algorithm comparison and validation for operational Landsat data products. Remote Sensing of Environment, 194, 379-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.03.026Gorelick, N., Hancher, M., Dixon, M., Ilyushchenko, S., Thau, D., and Moore, R. (2017). Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 202, pp. 18-27). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031Healey, S. P., Cohen, W. B., Yang, Z., Kenneth Brewer, C., Brooks, E. B., Gorelick, N., Hernandez, A. J., Huang, C., Joseph Hughes, M., Kennedy, R. E., Loveland, T. R., Moisen, G. G., Schroeder, T. A., Stehman, S. V., Vogelmann, J. E., Woodcock, C. E., Yang, L., and Zhu, Z. (2018). Mapping forest change using stacked generalization: An ensemble approach. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 204, pp. 717-728). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.09.029Kennedy, R. E., Yang, Z., and Cohen, W. B. (2010). Detecting trends in forest disturbance and recovery using yearly Landsat time series: 1. LandTrendr - Temporal segmentation algorithms. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 114, Issue 12, pp. 2897-2910). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.07.008Kennedy, R., Yang, Z., Gorelick, N., Braaten, J., Cavalcante, L., Cohen, W., and Healey, S. (2018). Implementation of the LandTrendr Algorithm on Google Earth Engine. In Remote Sensing (Vol. 10, Issue 5, p. 691). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10050691Olofsson, P., Foody, G. M., Herold, M., Stehman, S. V., Woodcock, C. E., and Wulder, M. A. (2014). Good practices for estimating area and assessing accuracy of land change. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 148, pp. 42-57). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.02.015Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M. and Duchesnay, E. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. In Journal of Machine Learning Research (Vol. 12, pp. 2825-2830).Pengra, B. W., Stehman, S. V., Horton, J. A., Dockter, D. J., Schroeder, T. A., Yang, Z., Cohen, W. B., Healey, S. P., and Loveland, T. R. (2020). Quality control and assessment of interpreter consistency of annual land cover reference data in an operational national monitoring program. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 238, p. 111261). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111261U.S. Geological Survey. (2019). USGS 3D Elevation Program Digital Elevation Model, accessed August 2022 at https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/USGS_3DEP_10mWeiss, A.D. (2001). Topographic position and landforms analysis Poster Presentation, ESRI Users Conference, San Diego, CAZhu, Z., and Woodcock, C. E. (2012). Object-based cloud and cloud shadow detection in Landsat imagery. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 118, pp. 83-94). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.10.028Zhu, Z., and Woodcock, C. E. (2014). Continuous change detection and classification of land cover using all available Landsat data. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 144, pp. 152-171). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.01.011This record was taken from the USDA Enterprise Data Inventory that feeds into the https://data.gov catalog. Data for this record includes the following resources: ISO-19139 metadata ArcGIS Hub Dataset ArcGIS GeoService For complete information, please visit https://data.gov.

  16. UCT World Digital Preservation Day 2021 event schedule

    • zivahub.uct.ac.za
    • figshare.com
    pdf
    Updated Jan 17, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Thandokazi Maceba; Niklas Zimmer; Sanjin Muftic; Nicholas Lindenberg; Thomas Slingsby; Ya'qub Ebrahim; Mzodidi Tutuka (2023). UCT World Digital Preservation Day 2021 event schedule [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.25375/uct.16929334.v1
    Explore at:
    pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 17, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Figsharehttp://figshare.com/
    figshare
    Authors
    Thandokazi Maceba; Niklas Zimmer; Sanjin Muftic; Nicholas Lindenberg; Thomas Slingsby; Ya'qub Ebrahim; Mzodidi Tutuka
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This is a programme of the UCT Libraries World Digital Preservation Day 2021 event hosted by the Digital Library Services virtually via Ms Teams on the 4th of November 2021.

  17. f

    Data from: ROLE OF GIS, RFID AND HANDHELD COMPUTERS IN EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT:...

    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    • scielo.figshare.com
    Updated Jun 7, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ahmed, Ashir (2022). ROLE OF GIS, RFID AND HANDHELD COMPUTERS IN EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT: AN EXPLORATORY CASE STUDY ANALYSIS [Dataset]. https://datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov/dataset?q=0000410052
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 7, 2022
    Authors
    Ahmed, Ashir
    Description

    This paper underlines the task characteristics of the emergency management life cycle. Moreover, the characteristics of three ubiquitous technologies including RFID, handheld computers and GIS are discussed and further used as a criterion to evaluate their potential for emergency management tasks. Built on a rather loose interpretation of Task-technology Fit model, a conceptual model presented in this paper advocates that a technology that offers better features for task characteristics is more likely to be adopted in emergency management. Empirical findings presented in this paper reveal the significance of task characteristics and their role in evaluating the suitability of three ubiquitous technologies before their actual adoption in emergency management.

  18. Monongahela National Forest Geospatial Data

    • agdatacommons.nal.usda.gov
    bin
    Updated Nov 22, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    USDA Forest Service (2025). Monongahela National Forest Geospatial Data [Dataset]. https://agdatacommons.nal.usda.gov/articles/dataset/Monongahela_National_Forest_Geospatial_Data/24661902
    Explore at:
    binAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 22, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Servicehttp://fs.fed.us/
    Authors
    USDA Forest Service
    License

    U.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Geospatial Services Land management within the US Forest Service and on the 900,000+ acre Monongahela National Forest (NF) is driven by a wide mix of resource and societal demands that prove a challenge in fulfilling the Forest Service’s mission of “Caring for the Land and Serving the People.” Programmatically, the 2006 Land and Resource Management Plan guide natural resource management activities on lands administered by the Monongahela National Forest. The Forest Plan describes management direction and practices, resource protection methods and monitoring, desired resource conditions, and the availability and suitability of lands for resource management. Technology enables staff to address these land management issues and Forest Plan direction by using a science-based approach to facilitate effective decisions. Monongahela NF geospatial services, using enabling-technologies, incorporate key tools such as Environmental Systems Research Institute’s ArcGIS desktop suite and Trimble’s global positioning system (GPS) units to meet program and Forest needs. Geospatial Datasets The Forest has a broad set of geospatial datasets that capture geographic features across the eastern West Virginia landscape. Many of these datasets are available to the public through our download site. Selected geospatial data that encompass the Monongahela National Forest are available for download from this page. A link to the FGDC-compliant metadata is provided for each dataset. All data are in zipped format (or available from the specified source), in one of two spatial data formats, and in the following coordinate system: Coordinate System: Universal Transverse Mercator Zone: 17 Units: Meters Datum: NAD 1983 Spheroid: GRS 1980 Map files – All map files are in pdf format. These maps illustrate the correlated geospatial data. All maps are under 1 MB unless otherwise noted. Metadata file – This FGDC-compliant metadata file contains information pertaining to the specific geospatial dataset. Shapefile – This downloadable zipped file is in ESRI’s shapefile format. KML file – This downloadable zipped file is in Google Earth’s KML format. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Monongahela National Forest Geospatial Data. File Name: Web Page, url: https://www.fs.usda.gov/detail/mnf/landmanagement/gis/?cid=stelprdb5108081 Selected geospatial data that encompass the Monongahela National Forest are available for download from this page.

  19. Landscape Change Monitoring System (LCMS) Hawaii Annual Landcover

    • agdatacommons.nal.usda.gov
    • catalog.data.gov
    • +3more
    bin
    Updated Nov 24, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Forest Service (2025). Landscape Change Monitoring System (LCMS) Hawaii Annual Landcover [Dataset]. https://agdatacommons.nal.usda.gov/articles/dataset/Landscape_Change_Monitoring_System_LCMS_Hawaii_Annual_Landcover_Image_Service_/27886866
    Explore at:
    binAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 24, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Servicehttp://fs.fed.us/
    Authors
    U.S. Forest Service
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Hawaii
    Description

    This product is part of the Landscape Change Monitoring System (LCMS) data suite. It shows LCMS modeled Land Cover classes for each year. See additional information about Land Cover in the Entity_and_Attribute_Information or Fields section below.LCMS is a remote sensing-based system for mapping and monitoring landscape change across the United States. Its objective is to develop a consistent approach using the latest technology and advancements in change detection to produce a "best available" map of landscape change. Because no algorithm performs best in all situations, LCMS uses an ensemble of models as predictors, which improves map accuracy across a range of ecosystems and change processes (Healey et al., 2018). The resulting suite of LCMS Change, Land Cover, and Land Use maps offer a holistic depiction of landscape change across the United States over the past four decades.Predictor layers for the LCMS model include outputs from the LandTrendr and CCDC change detection algorithms and terrain information. These components are all accessed and processed using Google Earth Engine (Gorelick et al., 2017). To produce annual composites, the cFmask (Zhu and Woodcock, 2012), cloudScore, Cloud Score + (Pasquarella et al., 2023), and TDOM (Chastain et al., 2019) cloud and cloud shadow masking methods are applied to Landsat Tier 1 and Sentinel 2a and 2b Level-1C top of atmosphere reflectance data. The annual medoid is then computed to summarize each year into a single composite. The composite time series is temporally segmented using LandTrendr (Kennedy et al., 2010; Kennedy et al., 2018; Cohen et al., 2018). All cloud and cloud shadow free values are also temporally segmented using the CCDC algorithm (Zhu and Woodcock, 2014). LandTrendr, CCDC and terrain predictors can be used as independent predictor variables in a Random Forest (Breiman, 2001) model. LandTrendr predictor variables include fitted values, pair-wise differences, segment duration, change magnitude, and slope. CCDC predictor variables include CCDC sine and cosine coefficients (first 3 harmonics), fitted values, and pairwise differences from the Julian Day of each pixel used in the annual composites and LandTrendr. Terrain predictor variables include elevation, slope, sine of aspect, cosine of aspect, and topographic position indices (Weiss, 2001) from the USGS 3D Elevation Program (3DEP) (U.S. Geological Survey, 2019). Reference data are collected using TimeSync, a web-based tool that helps analysts visualize and interpret the Landsat data record from 1984-present (Cohen et al., 2010).Outputs fall into three categories: Change, Land Cover, and Land Use. At its foundation, Change maps areas of Disturbance, Vegetation Successional Growth, and Stable landscape. More detailed levels of Change products are available and are intended to address needs centered around monitoring causes and types of variations in vegetation cover, water extent, or snow/ice extent that may or may not result in a transition of land cover and/or land use. Change, Land Cover, and Land Use are predicted for each year of the time series and serve as the foundational products for LCMS. This record was taken from the USDA Enterprise Data Inventory that feeds into the https://data.gov catalog. Data for this record includes the following resources: ISO-19139 metadata ArcGIS Hub Dataset ArcGIS GeoService For complete information, please visit https://data.gov.

  20. Total OSM edits per camp for the study period (01/01/2010–05/31/2017).

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ron Mahabir; Arie Croitoru; Andrew Crooks; Peggy Agouris; Anthony Stefanidis (2023). Total OSM edits per camp for the study period (01/01/2010–05/31/2017). [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206825.t002
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Ron Mahabir; Arie Croitoru; Andrew Crooks; Peggy Agouris; Anthony Stefanidis
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Total OSM edits per camp for the study period (01/01/2010–05/31/2017).

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
(2025). List of Top Authors of Geospatial Technology and the Role of Location in Science sorted by articles [Dataset]. https://exaly.com/journal/32326/geospatial-technology-and-the-role-of-location-i/prolific-authors

List of Top Authors of Geospatial Technology and the Role of Location in Science sorted by articles

Explore at:
csv, jsonAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Nov 1, 2025
License

Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Description

List of Top Authors of Geospatial Technology and the Role of Location in Science sorted by articles.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu