14 datasets found
  1. r

    Amazon Daily Traffic Statistics 2025

    • redstagfulfillment.com
    html
    Updated Jun 15, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Red Stag Fulfillment (2025). Amazon Daily Traffic Statistics 2025 [Dataset]. https://redstagfulfillment.com/how-many-daily-visits-does-amazon-receive/
    Explore at:
    htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 15, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Red Stag Fulfillment
    Time period covered
    May 2025
    Area covered
    Global
    Variables measured
    Bounce rate, Pages per visit, Session duration, Daily website visits, Monthly traffic volume, Traffic source distribution, Geographic visitor distribution, Mobile vs desktop traffic split
    Description

    Comprehensive analysis of Amazon's daily website traffic including visitor counts, traffic sources, mobile vs desktop usage, and seasonal patterns based on May 2025 data.

  2. Z

    Data Publication accompanying the paper "How FAIR can you get? Image...

    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    Updated Jan 24, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Tobias Weber (2020). Data Publication accompanying the paper "How FAIR can you get? Image Retrieval as a Use Case to calculate FAIR Metrics" [Dataset]. https://data.niaid.nih.gov/resources?id=ZENODO_3605801
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 24, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Tobias Weber
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This dataset is the result of a benchmark run for a use-case-centric FAIR metric. The applied tech stack uses OAI-PMH and DataCite. The use case central to this benchmark is the retrieval of temporally and spatially annotated images. The zipped archives includes the data created during the first test run in June 2018.

  3. f

    Data_Sheet_1_GitHub Statistics as a Measure of the Impact of Open-Source...

    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    • figshare.com
    pdf
    Updated May 31, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Mikhail G. Dozmorov (2023). Data_Sheet_1_GitHub Statistics as a Measure of the Impact of Open-Source Bioinformatics Software.PDF [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00198.s001
    Explore at:
    pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 31, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers
    Authors
    Mikhail G. Dozmorov
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Modern research is increasingly data-driven and reliant on bioinformatics software. Publication is a common way of introducing new software, but not all bioinformatics tools get published. Giving there are competing tools, it is important not merely to find the appropriate software, but have a metric for judging its usefulness. Journal's impact factor has been shown to be a poor predictor of software popularity; consequently, focusing on publications in high-impact journals limits user's choices in finding useful bioinformatics tools. Free and open source software repositories on popular code sharing platforms such as GitHub provide another venue to follow the latest bioinformatics trends. The open source component of GitHub allows users to bookmark and copy repositories that are most useful to them. This Perspective aims to demonstrate the utility of GitHub “stars,” “watchers,” and “forks” (GitHub statistics) as a measure of software impact. We compiled lists of impactful bioinformatics software and analyzed commonly used impact metrics and GitHub statistics of 50 genomics-oriented bioinformatics tools. We present examples of community-selected best bioinformatics resources and show that GitHub statistics are distinct from the journal's impact factor (JIF), citation counts, and alternative metrics (Altmetrics, CiteScore) in capturing the level of community attention. We suggest the use of GitHub statistics as an unbiased measure of the usability of bioinformatics software complementing the traditional impact metrics.

  4. Daily, County-Level Wet-Bulb Globe Temperature, Universal Thermal Climate...

    • figshare.com
    application/gzip
    Updated Jul 19, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Keith Spangler (2022). Daily, County-Level Wet-Bulb Globe Temperature, Universal Thermal Climate Index, and Other Heat Metrics for the Contiguous United States, 2000-2020 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19419836.v2
    Explore at:
    application/gzipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 19, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    Figsharehttp://figshare.com/
    Authors
    Keith Spangler
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Contiguous United States, United States
    Description

    This data set includes daily, population-weighted mean values of various heat metrics for every county in the contiguous United States from 2000-2020. The dataset methodology, usage notes, and additional citations are published in Scientific Data (see reference below for Spangler et al. [2022]). Minimum, maximum, and mean ambient temperature, dew-point temperature, humidex, heat index, net effective temperature, wet-bulb globe temperature, and Universal Thermal Climate Index are included. Note that Monroe County, Florida (FIPS: 12087) and Nantucket County, Massachusetts (FIPS 25019) are missing due to unavailability of ERA5-Land data for Key West, Florida and Nantucket, MA. To use these data, assign the data from the .Rds file to a new data frame in R using the readRDS() function. Please cite the use of this data set with the following reference. Note that additional citations for specific variables can be found in Table 2.

    K.R. Spangler, S. Liang, and G.A. Wellenius. "Wet-Bulb Globe Temperature, Universal Thermal Climate Index, and Other Heat Metrics for US Counties, 2000-2020." Scientific Data (2022). doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01405-3

    This data set contains modified Copernicus Climate Change Service information (2022), as described and cited in the manuscript referenced above. Neither the European Commission nor ECMWF is responsible for any use that may be made of the Copernicus information or data it contains. This data set is provided “as is” with no warranty of any kind.

  5. Other

    • getresponse.com
    Updated Apr 5, 2017
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    GetResponse (2017). Other [Dataset]. https://www.getresponse.com/resources/reports/email-marketing-benchmarks
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 5, 2017
    Dataset authored and provided by
    GetResponse
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Here, we’re looking at other elements that may play a role in how you run your email marketing campaigns and the average metrics you could expect.

  6. f

    Network metrics of network of contact behavior.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xlsx
    Updated Feb 12, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Shuta Kikuchi; Keisuke Nakajima; Yasuki Kato; Takeshi Takizawa; Junichi Sugiyama; Taisei Mukai; Yasushi Kakizawa; Setsuya Kurahashi (2025). Network metrics of network of contact behavior. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313364.s011
    Explore at:
    xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 12, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Shuta Kikuchi; Keisuke Nakajima; Yasuki Kato; Takeshi Takizawa; Junichi Sugiyama; Taisei Mukai; Yasushi Kakizawa; Setsuya Kurahashi
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    In elementary schools, immunologically immature students come into close contact with each other and are susceptible to the spread of infectious diseases. To analyze pathogen transmission among students, it is essential to obtain behavioral data. Questionnaires and wearable sensor devices were used for communication behavior and swab sampling was employed for contact behavior. However, these methods have been insufficient in capturing information about the processes and actions of each student that contribute to pathogen transmission. Therefore, in this study, actual behavioral data were collected using video recordings to evaluate droplet and contact transmission in elementary schools. The analysis of communication behavior revealed the diverse nature of interactions among students. By calculating the droplet transmission probabilities based on conversation duration, the risk of droplet transmission was quantified. In the contact behavior, we introduced a novel approach for constructing contact networks based on contact history. According to this method, well-known items, such as students’ desks, doors, and faucets, were predicted to be potential fomite. In addition, students’ shirts and shared items with high contact frequency and high centrality metrics in the network, which were not evaluated in swab sampling surveys, were identified as potential fomites. The reliability of the predictions was demonstrated through micro-simulations. The micro-simulations replicated virus transmission scenarios in which virus-carrying students were present in the actual contact history. The results showed that a significant amount of virus adhered to the items predicted to be fomites. Interestingly, the micro-simulations indicated that most viral copies were transmitted through single items. The analysis of contact history, contact networks, and micro-simulations relies on video-recorded behavioral data, highlighting the importance of this method. This study contributes significantly to the prevention of infectious diseases in elementary schools by providing evidence-based information about transmission pathways and behavior-related risks.

  7. AfriSAR: Canopy Cover and Vertical Profile Metrics Derived from LVIS, Gabon,...

    • daac.ornl.gov
    • data.nasa.gov
    • +3more
    csv
    Updated Oct 29, 2018
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    TANG, H.; ARMSTON, J.; HANCOCK, S.; HOFTON, M.A.; BLAIR, J.B.; FATOYINBO, L.; DUBAYAH, R.O. (2018). AfriSAR: Canopy Cover and Vertical Profile Metrics Derived from LVIS, Gabon, 2016 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1591
    Explore at:
    csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 29, 2018
    Dataset provided by
    Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center
    Authors
    TANG, H.; ARMSTON, J.; HANCOCK, S.; HOFTON, M.A.; BLAIR, J.B.; FATOYINBO, L.; DUBAYAH, R.O.
    Time period covered
    Feb 20, 2016 - Mar 8, 2016
    Area covered
    Description

    This dataset includes footprint-level canopy structure products derived from data collected using NASA's Land, Vegetation, and Ice Sensor (LVIS) during flights over five forested sites in Gabon during February and March 2016. Three types of canopy structure information are included for each flight: 1) vertical profiles of canopy cover fraction in 1-meter bins, 2) vertical profiles of plant area index (PAI) in 1-meter bins, and 3) footprint summary data of total recorded energy, leaf area index, canopy cover fraction, and vertical foliage profiles in 10-meter bins. Canopy structure metrics are provided for each waveform (20-m footprint) collected by the LVIS instrument. These data were collected by NASA as part of the AfriSAR project. AfriSAR is a NASA collaboration with the European Space Agency (ESA), German Aerospace Center (DLR), and the Gabonese Space Agency (AGEOS) that is collecting data useful for deriving forest canopy structure and will help prepare for and calibrate current and upcoming spaceborne missions that aim to gauge the role of forests in Earth's carbon cycle.

  8. Use of video

    • getresponse.com
    Updated Apr 5, 2017
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    GetResponse (2017). Use of video [Dataset]. https://www.getresponse.com/resources/reports/email-marketing-benchmarks
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 5, 2017
    Dataset authored and provided by
    GetResponse
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    In this table, we’re looking at whether adding video content (including links to your video hosting platforms) could help you boost your engagement metrics, primarily the average click-th rough and click-to-open rates.

  9. Number of newsletters per week

    • getresponse.com
    Updated Apr 5, 2017
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    GetResponse (2017). Number of newsletters per week [Dataset]. https://www.getresponse.com/resources/reports/email-marketing-benchmarks
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 5, 2017
    Dataset authored and provided by
    GetResponse
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    What’s the right email frequency? What’s the potential increase in the number of conversions your email campaigns generate if you add an extra message to your schedule? The data in this table should help you find the right answers.

  10. Phrases in email subject lines

    • getresponse.com
    Updated Apr 5, 2017
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    GetResponse (2017). Phrases in email subject lines [Dataset]. https://www.getresponse.com/resources/reports/email-marketing-benchmarks
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 5, 2017
    Dataset authored and provided by
    GetResponse
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Do individual phrases in email subject lines correlate with email campaign performance? Here we explore whether individual words have the power to make or break your email campaigns.

  11. Average results by industry

    • getresponse.com
    Updated Apr 5, 2017
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    GetResponse (2017). Average results by industry [Dataset]. https://www.getresponse.com/resources/reports/email-marketing-benchmarks
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 5, 2017
    Dataset authored and provided by
    GetResponse
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Here, we’ve gathered email marketing benchmarks by industry. You can see how your average email open, click-through, click-to-open, unsubscribe, and spam complaint rates compare against other companies in your industry.

  12. f

    Summary statistics of four PP activation metrics.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 10, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Manish Singh; Qingyang Xu; Sarah J. Wang; Tinah Hong; Mohammad M. Ghassemi; Andrew W. Lo (2023). Summary statistics of four PP activation metrics. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269752.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 10, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Manish Singh; Qingyang Xu; Sarah J. Wang; Tinah Hong; Mohammad M. Ghassemi; Andrew W. Lo
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Average activation is a dimensionless quantity. Mild and extreme activation proportions are measured in percentages (%). Activation length is measured in seconds (s).

  13. Email opens and clicks over time

    • getresponse.com
    Updated Apr 5, 2017
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    GetResponse (2017). Email opens and clicks over time [Dataset]. https://www.getresponse.com/resources/reports/email-marketing-benchmarks
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 5, 2017
    Dataset authored and provided by
    GetResponse
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    How many of your subscribers open your emails within the first two, four, or six hours after sending? Is it the same for clicks? Here, we’re looking at how the recipients’ engagement changed over time after the campaign was sent.

  14. Landing page conversion by industry

    • getresponse.com
    Updated Apr 5, 2017
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    GetResponse (2017). Landing page conversion by industry [Dataset]. https://www.getresponse.com/resources/reports/email-marketing-benchmarks
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 5, 2017
    Dataset authored and provided by
    GetResponse
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    In this table, you’ll see the average landing page conversions based on the subscription rate they generated across industries.

  15. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Red Stag Fulfillment (2025). Amazon Daily Traffic Statistics 2025 [Dataset]. https://redstagfulfillment.com/how-many-daily-visits-does-amazon-receive/

Amazon Daily Traffic Statistics 2025

Explore at:
htmlAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Jun 15, 2025
Dataset authored and provided by
Red Stag Fulfillment
Time period covered
May 2025
Area covered
Global
Variables measured
Bounce rate, Pages per visit, Session duration, Daily website visits, Monthly traffic volume, Traffic source distribution, Geographic visitor distribution, Mobile vs desktop traffic split
Description

Comprehensive analysis of Amazon's daily website traffic including visitor counts, traffic sources, mobile vs desktop usage, and seasonal patterns based on May 2025 data.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu