The Digital Geomorphic-GIS Map of Gulf Islands National Seashore (5-meter accuracy and 1-foot resolution 2006-2007 mapping), Mississippi and Florida is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) a 10.1 file geodatabase (guis_geomorphology.gdb), a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage, and 3.) 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file (guis_geomorphology.mapx) and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer), as well as with a 2.) 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (guis_geomorphology.mxd) and individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files (for each GIS data layer). The OGC geopackage is supported with a QGIS project (.qgz) file. Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) A GIS readme file (guis_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (guis_geomorphology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (guis_geomorphology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the guis_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. Google Earth software is available for free at: https://www.google.com/earth/versions/. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri,htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: U.S. Geological Survey. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (guis_geomorphology_metadata.txt or guis_geomorphology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:26,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 13.2 meters or 43.3 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).

The global GIS mapping tools market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing demand across diverse sectors. The market, estimated at $15 billion in 2025, is projected to expand at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 8% from 2025 to 2033, reaching approximately $28 billion by 2033. This growth is fueled by several key factors. Firstly, the burgeoning adoption of cloud-based solutions offers scalability, cost-effectiveness, and enhanced accessibility to a wider user base, including small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Secondly, the escalating need for precise spatial data analysis in various applications, such as urban planning, geological exploration, and water resource management, is significantly boosting market demand. The increasing integration of GIS with other technologies like AI and IoT further amplifies its capabilities, leading to more sophisticated applications and increased market penetration. Finally, government initiatives promoting digitalization and smart city development across the globe are indirectly fueling this market expansion. However, certain restraints limit market growth. The high initial investment cost for advanced GIS software and the requirement for skilled professionals to operate these systems can be a barrier, especially for smaller organizations. Additionally, data security and privacy concerns related to the handling of sensitive geographical information pose challenges to wider adoption. Market segmentation reveals strong growth in the cloud-based GIS segment, driven by its inherent advantages, while applications in urban planning and geological exploration lead the application-based segmentation. North America and Europe currently hold significant market shares, with strong growth potential in the Asia-Pacific region due to increasing infrastructure development and government investments. Leading companies like Esri, Hexagon, and Autodesk are shaping the market landscape through continuous innovation and competitive pricing strategies, while the emergence of open-source options like QGIS and GRASS GIS provides alternative, cost-effective solutions.

The global GIS mapping tools market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing demand across diverse sectors. The market, estimated at $15 billion in 2025, is projected to witness a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 10% from 2025 to 2033, reaching approximately $39 billion by 2033. This expansion is fueled by several key factors. Firstly, the rising adoption of cloud-based GIS solutions offers enhanced accessibility, scalability, and cost-effectiveness, particularly appealing to smaller organizations. Secondly, the burgeoning need for precise spatial data analysis in various applications, including urban planning, geological exploration, and water resource management, significantly contributes to market growth. Thirdly, advancements in technologies such as AI and machine learning are integrating into GIS tools, leading to more sophisticated analytical capabilities and improved decision-making. Finally, the increasing availability of high-resolution satellite imagery and other geospatial data further fuels market expansion. However, market growth is not without challenges. High initial investment costs associated with implementing and maintaining sophisticated GIS systems can pose a barrier to entry for smaller businesses. Furthermore, the complexity of GIS software and the need for specialized skills to operate and interpret data effectively can limit widespread adoption. Despite these restraints, the market’s overall trajectory remains positive, with the cloud-based segment projected to maintain a dominant market share due to its inherent advantages. Growth will be geographically diverse, with North America and Europe continuing to be significant markets, while Asia-Pacific is expected to experience the fastest growth due to rapid urbanization and infrastructure development. The continued development of user-friendly interfaces and increased integration with other business intelligence tools will further accelerate market expansion in the coming years.

HEPGIS is a web-based interactive geographic map server that allows users to navigate and view geo-spatial data, print maps, and obtain data on specific features using only a web browser. It includes geo-spatial data used for transportation planning. HEPGIS previously received ARRA funding for development of Economically distressed Area maps. It is also being used to demonstrate emerging trends to address MPO and statewide planning regulations/requirements , enhanced National Highway System, Primary Freight Networks, commodity flows and safety data . HEPGIS has been used to help implement MAP-21 regulations and will help implement the Grow America Act, particularly related to Ladder of Opportunities and MPO reforms.

The cloud-based mapping service market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing adoption of location-based services across various sectors. The convergence of advanced technologies like AI, IoT, and big data analytics is fueling demand for sophisticated mapping solutions capable of handling vast datasets and delivering real-time insights. Key application areas, such as connected ADAS (Advanced Driver-Assistance Systems) and highly automated driving, are significant contributors to market expansion, demanding high-precision, dynamic mapping capabilities. The shift towards cloud-based infrastructure offers scalability, cost-effectiveness, and accessibility advantages over traditional on-premise solutions, further accelerating market penetration. Different map types, including analytical, animated, collaborative, and online atlases, cater to diverse needs, creating a multifaceted market landscape. While data security and privacy concerns represent potential restraints, the market is poised for sustained growth due to continuous technological advancements and expanding application domains. We estimate the 2025 market size to be approximately $15 billion, projecting a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 15% from 2025 to 2033. This growth is underpinned by continuous innovation in mapping technologies and the expanding adoption of location intelligence across various industries. The major players in this market, including ESRI, Pitney Bowes, and CARTO, are investing heavily in R&D to enhance their offerings and gain a competitive edge. Regional variations exist, with North America and Europe currently holding significant market share, primarily due to higher technological adoption rates and established infrastructure. However, Asia Pacific is anticipated to witness rapid growth in the coming years, driven by increasing urbanization and expanding digital economies. The competitive landscape is characterized by both established players and emerging innovative companies striving for market dominance. This competitive dynamic is driving innovation and pushing the boundaries of what's possible with cloud-based mapping services, further contributing to the market's overall growth trajectory.

The market for GIS Mapping Tools is projected to reach a value of $XX million by 2033, growing at a CAGR of XX% during the forecast period (2025-2033). The market growth is attributed to the increasing adoption of GIS mapping tools by various industries, including government, utilities, and telecom, for a wide range of applications such as geological exploration, water conservancy projects, and urban planning. The convergence of GIS with other technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) and the Internet of Things (IoT) is further driving market growth, as these technologies enable GIS mapping tools to provide more accurate and real-time data analysis. The market is segmented by type (cloud-based, web-based), application (geological exploration, water conservancy projects, urban planning, others), and region (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East & Africa). North America is expected to remain the largest market for GIS mapping tools throughout the forecast period, due to the early adoption of these technologies and the presence of leading vendors such as Esri, MapInfo, and Autodesk. Asia Pacific is expected to experience the highest growth rate during the forecast period, due to the increasing adoption of GIS mapping tools in emerging economies such as China and India. Key industry players include Golden Software Surfer, Geoway, QGIS, GRASS GIS, Google Earth Pro, CARTO, Maptive, Shenzhen Edraw Software, MapGIS, Oasis montaj, DIVA-GIS, Esri, MapInfo, Autodesk, BatchGeo, Cadcorp, Hexagon, Mapbox, Trimble, and ArcGIS.

The global GIS mapping tools market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing demand across diverse sectors. The market's expansion is fueled by several key factors: the rising adoption of cloud-based GIS solutions offering enhanced accessibility and scalability, the escalating need for precise spatial data analysis in urban planning and resource management, and the expanding application of GIS in geological exploration for efficient resource discovery and extraction. Furthermore, advancements in location-based services (LBS) and the integration of GIS with other technologies such as IoT and AI are creating new opportunities and driving market expansion. While the market size in 2025 is estimated at $15 billion (a reasonable assumption considering similar market sizes for related technologies), the Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) is projected to remain strong, likely exceeding 8% through 2033. This sustained growth indicates a highly promising market outlook for vendors and investors. However, market growth is not without challenges. High initial investment costs for sophisticated GIS software and the requirement for skilled personnel to operate and maintain these systems can pose barriers to entry, particularly for smaller organizations. Additionally, data security concerns and the need for robust data management strategies are critical factors impacting market adoption. Despite these constraints, the continued integration of GIS tools into various business processes and the growing availability of user-friendly, affordable solutions are expected to mitigate these challenges and propel the market towards sustained and significant growth in the coming years. Segmentation reveals a strong preference for cloud-based solutions due to their flexibility and cost-effectiveness, with the geological exploration and urban planning applications exhibiting the highest growth rates. Key players such as Esri, Autodesk, and Hexagon are strategically positioned to capitalize on these trends.

The Digital Geomorphologic-GIS Map of Sagamore Hill National Historic Site and Vicinity, New York is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) a 10.1 file geodatabase (sahi_geomorphology.gdb), a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage, and 3.) 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file (sahi_geomorphology.mapx) and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer), as well as with a 2.) 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (sahi_geomorphology.mxd) and individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files (for each GIS data layer). The OGC geopackage is supported with a QGIS project (.qgz) file. Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) A GIS readme file (sahi_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (sahi_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (sahi_geomorphology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the sahi_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. Google Earth software is available for free at: https://www.google.com/earth/versions/. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri,htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: Rutgers University, Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (sahi_geomorphology_metadata.txt or sahi_geomorphology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:6,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 5.1 meters or 16.7 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).

Code and data for the paper "Enriching the metadata of map images: a deep learning approach with GIS-based data augmentation"

This archived Paleoclimatology Study is available from the NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), under the World Data Service (WDS) for Paleoclimatology. The associated NCEI study type is Climate Reconstruction. The data include parameters of climate reconstructions with a geographic location of Global. The time period coverage is from 18000 to 18000 in calendar years before present (BP). See metadata information for parameter and study location details. Please cite this study when using the data.

The global GIS Mapping Software market size is projected to reach USD 14.7 billion by 2029, exhibiting a CAGR of 12.5% during the forecast period. The rising adoption of GIS software in various industries, including utilities, transportation, retail, and government, is driving market growth. Additionally, the increasing availability of high-resolution satellite imagery and the growing trend of smart cities are contributing to the demand for GIS software. The market is segmented based on type into continuous flow dryer, horizontal band dryer, tower grain dryer, portable dryer, and others. The continuous flow dryer segment holds the largest market share due to its high efficiency and ability to handle large volumes of grain. Based on application, the market is divided into agricultural, industrial, and commercial. The agricultural segment dominates the market owing to the widespread use of GIS software for precision farming and crop monitoring. Geographically, North America held the largest market share in 2021, followed by Europe and Asia-Pacific. The high adoption rate of GIS software in developed countries, such as the United States and Canada, is a major factor driving the market growth in North America.

The cloud-based mapping service market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing demand for location-based services across diverse sectors. The market size in 2025 is estimated at $15 billion, projecting a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 15% from 2025 to 2033. This expansion is fueled by several key factors, including the rising adoption of cloud computing, the increasing availability of high-resolution geospatial data, and the growing need for real-time location intelligence in applications like urban planning, logistics, and environmental monitoring. Furthermore, advancements in mapping technologies such as AI-powered image analysis and 3D modeling are enhancing the capabilities of cloud-based mapping services, making them more versatile and valuable to businesses and governments alike. The ease of accessibility, scalability, and cost-effectiveness offered by cloud-based solutions are further propelling market growth, attracting a wide range of users from small businesses to large enterprises. This growth trajectory is further supported by the ongoing integration of cloud-based mapping services with other technologies like IoT (Internet of Things) and big data analytics. This convergence enables the creation of sophisticated location-based applications that offer advanced functionalities, such as predictive analytics, route optimization, and asset tracking. While challenges remain, such as data security concerns and the need for robust internet connectivity, the overall market outlook remains positive, with a projected market value exceeding $45 billion by 2033. The competitive landscape includes established players like ESRI and Trimble, alongside emerging innovative companies continuously improving the technology and expanding market reach. This dynamic interplay of technological advancements, increasing demand, and competitive innovation is set to shape the future of cloud-based mapping services.

The digital map market, currently valued at $25.55 billion in 2025, is experiencing robust growth, projected to expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 13.39% from 2025 to 2033. This expansion is fueled by several key factors. The increasing adoption of location-based services (LBS) across various sectors, including transportation, logistics, and e-commerce, is a primary driver. Furthermore, the proliferation of smartphones and connected devices, coupled with advancements in GPS technology and mapping software, continues to fuel market growth. The rising demand for high-resolution, real-time mapping data for autonomous vehicles and smart city initiatives also significantly contributes to market expansion. Competition among established players like Google, TomTom, and ESRI, alongside emerging innovative companies, is fostering continuous improvement in map accuracy, functionality, and data accessibility. This competitive landscape drives innovation and lowers costs, making digital maps increasingly accessible to a broader range of users and applications. However, market growth is not without its challenges. Data security and privacy concerns surrounding the collection and use of location data represent a significant restraint. Ensuring data accuracy and maintaining up-to-date map information in rapidly changing environments also pose operational hurdles. Regulatory compliance with differing data privacy laws across various jurisdictions adds another layer of complexity. Despite these challenges, the long-term outlook for the digital map market remains positive, driven by the relentless integration of location intelligence into nearly every facet of modern life, from personal navigation to complex enterprise logistics solutions. The market's segmentation (although not explicitly provided) likely includes various map types (e.g., road maps, satellite imagery, 3D maps), pricing models (subscriptions, one-time purchases), and industry verticals served. This diversified market structure further underscores its resilience and potential for sustained growth. Recent developments include: December 2022 - The Linux Foundation has partnered with some of the biggest technology companies in the world to build interoperable and open map data in what is an apparent move t. The Overture Maps Foundation, as the new effort is called, is officially hosted by the Linux Foundation. The ultimate aim of the Overture Maps Foundation is to power new map products through openly available datasets that can be used and reused across applications and businesses, with each member throwing their data and resources into the mix., July 27, 2022 - Google declared the launch of its Street View experience in India in collaboration with Genesys International, an advanced mapping solutions company, and Tech Mahindra, a provider of digital transformation, consulting, and business re-engineering solutions and services. Google, Tech Mahindra, and Genesys International also plan to extend this to more than around 50 cities by the end of the year 2022.. Key drivers for this market are: Growth in Application for Advanced Navigation System in Automotive Industry, Surge in Demand for Geographic Information System (GIS); Increased Adoption of Connected Devices and Internet. Potential restraints include: Growth in Application for Advanced Navigation System in Automotive Industry, Surge in Demand for Geographic Information System (GIS); Increased Adoption of Connected Devices and Internet. Notable trends are: Surge in Demand for GIS and GNSS to Influence the Adoption of Digital Map Technology.

The Digital Geomorphic-GIS Map of the Avon Area (1:24,000 scale 2007 mapping), North Carolina is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) a 10.1 file geodatabase (avon_geomorphology.gdb), and a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file (avon_geomorphology.mapx) and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer), as well as with a 2.) 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (avon_geomorphology.mxd) and individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files (for each GIS data layer). Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) A GIS readme file (caha_fora_wrbr_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (caha_fora_wrbr_geomorphology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (avon_geomorphology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the caha_fora_wrbr_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri,htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: North Carolina Geological Survey. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (avon_geomorphology_metadata.txt or avon_geomorphology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:24,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 12.2 meters or 40 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in ArcGIS, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).

DOUGLAS COUNTY SURVEY/GISGIS PARCEL MAPPING GUIDELINES FOR PARCEL DISCREPANCIESIt is the intent of the Douglas County GIS Parcel Mapping to accurately identify the areas of land parcels to be valued and taxed 1. Discrepancies in areas• The Auditor/Assessor (tax) acreage areas started with the original US General Land Office (GLO) township plat maps created from the Public Land Survey (PLS) that was done between 1858 and 1871. The recovery of the PLS corners and the accurate location of these corners with GPS obtained coordinates has allowed for accurate section subdivisions, which results in accurate areas for parcels based on legal descriptions, which may be significantly different than the original areas. (See Example 2)• Any parcel bordering a meandered lake and/or a water boundary will likely have a disparity of area between the Auditor/Assessor acreages and the GIS acreages because of the inaccuracy of the original GLO meander lines from which the original areas were determined. Water lines are not able to be drafted to the same accuracy as the normal parcel lines. The water lines are usually just sketched on a survey and their dimensions are not generally given on a land record. The water boundaries of our GIS parcels are located from aerial photography. This is a subjective determination based on the interpretation by the Survey/GIS technician of what is water. Some lakes fluctuate significantly and the areas of all parcels bordering water are subject to constant change. In these cases the ordinary high water line (OHW) is attempted to be identified. Use of 2-foot contours will be made, if available. (See Example 1)• Some land records do not accurately report the area described in the land description and the description area is ignored. (See Example 3)• The parcel mapping has made every attempt to map the parcels based on available survey information as surveyed and located on the ground. This may conflict with some record legal descriptions.Solutions• If an actual survey by a licensed Land Surveyor is available, it will be utilized for the tax acreage.• If the Auditor/Assessor finds a discrepancy between the tax and GIS areas, they will request a review by the County Survey/GIS department.• As a starting guideline, the County Survey/GIS department will identify all parcels that differ in tax area versus GIS parcel area of 10 % or more and a difference of at least 5 acres. (This could be expanded later after the initial review.)• Each of these identified parcels will be reviewed individually by the County Survey/GIS department to determine the reason for the discrepancy and a recommendation will be made by the County Survey/GIS department to the Auditor/Assessor if the change should be made or not.• If a change is to be made to the tax area, a letter will be sent to the taxpayer informing them that their area will be changed during the next tax cycle, which could affect their property valuation. This letter will originate from the Auditor/Assessor with explanation from the County Survey/GIS department. 2. Gaps and Overlaps• Land descriptions for adjoining parcels sometimes overlap or leave a gap between them.o In these instances the Survey/GIS technician has to make a decision where to place this boundary. A number of circumstances are reviewed to facilitate this decision as these dilemmas are usually decided on a case by case basis. All effort will be made to not leave a gap, but sometimes this is not possible and the gap will be shown with “unknown” ownership. (Note: The County does not have the authority to change boundaries!)o Some of the circumstances reviewed are: Which parcel had the initial legal description? Does the physical occupation of the parcel line as shown on the air photo more closely fit one of the described parcels? Interpretation of the intent of the legal description. Is the legal description surveyable?Note: These overlaps will be shown on the GIS map with a dashed “survey line” and accompanying text for the line not used for the parcel boundary. 3. Parcel lines that do not match location of buildings Structures on parcels do not always lie within the boundaries of the parcel. This may be a circumstance of building without the benefit of a survey or of misinterpreting these boundaries. The parcel lines should be shown accurately as surveyed and/or described regardless of the location of structures on the ground. NOTE: The GIS mapping is not a survey, but is an interpretation of parcel boundaries predicated upon resources available to the County Survey/GIS department.Gary Stevenson Page 1 7/21/2017Example 1Example 2A Example 2B Example 3

The geographical mapping software market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing demand across diverse sectors. The market, estimated at $15 billion in 2025, is projected to expand at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 12% from 2025 to 2033, reaching an estimated $45 billion by 2033. This expansion is fueled by several key factors. The rise of cloud-based solutions offers enhanced accessibility, scalability, and collaboration features, attracting a broader user base. Furthermore, the increasing adoption of GIS (Geographic Information Systems) technology in various applications, including geological exploration, water conservancy projects, and urban planning, is significantly boosting market demand. Government initiatives promoting digital infrastructure development and smart city projects are further contributing to market growth. The rising need for precise location-based services and real-time data analysis across sectors like transportation, logistics, and agriculture also plays a significant role. While data security concerns and the high initial investment costs associated with implementing sophisticated mapping software can act as restraints, the overall market outlook remains highly positive. The market segmentation reveals strong growth in both cloud-based and web-based solutions. Cloud-based solutions are gaining traction due to their flexibility and cost-effectiveness, while web-based solutions remain popular for their ease of use and accessibility. The application segment demonstrates considerable potential, with geological exploration and urban planning leading the way. This suggests a robust future for geographical mapping software, particularly in areas requiring detailed spatial analysis and data visualization. Geographical regions like North America and Europe currently hold a significant market share, but the Asia-Pacific region is expected to witness rapid growth in the coming years driven by increasing infrastructure development and technological advancements. Competition in the market is intense, with established players like Esri and Autodesk alongside emerging innovative companies vying for market share. The continuous evolution of GIS technology, encompassing features like AI-powered analytics and 3D mapping capabilities, is set to further shape market dynamics in the years to come.

Geographic Information System Software Market Outlook

The global Geographic Information System (GIS) Software market size was valued at approximately USD 7.8 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 15.6 billion by 2032, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8.3% during the forecast period. This impressive growth can be attributed to the increasing demand for efficient data management tools across various industries, which rely on spatial data for decision-making and strategic planning. The rapid advancements in technology, such as the integration of AI and IoT with GIS software, have further propelled the market, enabling organizations to harness the full potential of geographic data in innovative ways.

One of the primary growth drivers of the GIS Software market is the burgeoning need for urban planning and smart city initiatives worldwide. As urbanization trends escalate, cities are increasingly relying on GIS technology to manage resources more effectively, optimize transportation networks, and enhance public safety. The ability of GIS software to provide real-time data and spatial analysis is vital for city planners and administrators faced with the challenges of modern urban environments. Furthermore, the trend towards digital transformation in governmental organizations is boosting the adoption of GIS solutions, as they seek to improve operational efficiency and service delivery.

The agricultural sector is also experiencing significant transformations due to the integration of GIS software, which is another pivotal growth factor for the market. Precision agriculture, which involves the use of GIS technologies to monitor and manage farming practices, is enabling farmers to increase crop yields while reducing resource consumption. By leveraging spatial data, farmers can make informed decisions about planting, irrigation, and harvesting, ultimately leading to more sustainable agricultural practices. This trend is particularly prominent in regions where agriculture forms a substantial portion of the economy, encouraging the adoption of advanced GIS tools to maintain competitive advantage.

Another influential factor contributing to the growth of the GIS Software market is the increasing importance of environmental management and disaster response. GIS technology plays a crucial role in assessing environmental changes, managing natural resources, and planning responses to natural disasters. The ability to overlay various data sets onto geographic maps allows for better analysis and understanding of environmental phenomena, making GIS indispensable in tackling issues such as climate change and resource depletion. Moreover, governments and organizations are investing heavily in GIS tools that aid in disaster preparedness and response, ensuring timely and effective action during emergencies.

The evolution of GIS Mapping Software has been instrumental in transforming how spatial data is utilized across various sectors. These software solutions offer robust tools for visualizing, analyzing, and interpreting geographic data, enabling users to make informed decisions based on spatial insights. With the ability to integrate multiple data sources, GIS Mapping Software provides a comprehensive platform for conducting spatial analysis, which is crucial for applications ranging from urban planning to environmental management. As technology continues to advance, the capabilities of GIS Mapping Software are expanding, offering more sophisticated features such as 3D visualization and real-time data processing. These advancements are not only enhancing the utility of GIS tools but also making them more accessible to a wider range of users, thereby driving their adoption across different industries.

Regionally, North America and Europe have traditionally dominated the GIS Software market, thanks to their robust technological infrastructure and higher adoption rates of advanced technologies. However, Asia Pacific is expected to witness the highest growth rate during the forecast period, driven by rapid urbanization, increased government spending on infrastructure development, and the expanding telecommunications sector. The growing awareness and adoption of GIS solutions in countries like China and India are significant contributors to this regional growth. Furthermore, Latin America and the Middle East & Africa regions are slowly catching up, with ongoing investments in smart city projects and infrastructure development driving the demand for GIS software.

Component Analysis</h2&

The Digital Geologic-GIS Map of the Gaylesville Quadrangle, Alabama is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) a 10.1 file geodatabase (gayl_geology.gdb), and a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file (gayl_geology.mapx) and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer), as well as with a 2.) 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (gayl_geology.mxd) and individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files (for each GIS data layer). Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) this file (liri_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (liri_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (gayl_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the liri_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri,htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: Geological Survey of Alabama. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (gayl_geology_metadata.txt or gayl_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:24,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 12.2 meters or 40 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in ArcGIS, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).

The Digital Geologic-GIS Map of the Mammoth Cave Quadrangle, Kentucky is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) a 10.1 file geodatabase (macv_geology.gdb), and a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file (macv_geology.mapx) and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer), as well as with a 2.) 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (macv_geology.mxd) and individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files (for each GIS data layer). Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) a readme file (maca_abli_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (maca_abli_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (macv_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the maca_abli_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri,htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: U.S. Geological Survey. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (macv_geology_metadata.txt or macv_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:24,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 12.2 meters or 40 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in ArcGIS, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).

The Digital Geomorphic-GIS Map of Cat Island (5-meter accuracy 2007 mapping), Mississippi is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) a 10.1 file geodatabase (cati_geomorphology.gdb), and a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file (cati_geomorphology.mapx) and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer), as well as with a 2.) 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (cati_geomorphology.mxd) and individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files (for each GIS data layer). Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) A GIS readme file (guis_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (guis_geomorphology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (cati_geomorphology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the guis_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri,htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: U.S. Geological Survey. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (cati_geomorphology_metadata.txt or cati_geomorphology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:11,500 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 9.7 meters or 31.9 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in ArcGIS, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).