Dataset description: This dataset contains the information needed to replicate the results presented in the article “Optimizing recruitment in PPGIS – is it worth the time and the costs?”. The data were collected as part of a study investigating recruitment strategies for a large-scale online public participation GIS (PPGIS) platform in coastal areas of Northern Norway. To investigate different recruitment strategies, we reviewed previous environmental PPGIS studies using random sampling and methods to increase response rates. We compared the attained results with our large-scale PPGIS in Northern Norway, where we used both random and volunteer (traditional and social media) sampling. The dataset includes response rates for the 5% of the population (13 regions in Northern Norway) recruited by mail to participate in an online PPGIS survey, response rates from volunteers recruited through traditional and social media, synthetic demographic data, and the code necessary for processing demographic data to obtain the results presented in the article. Original demographic data is not shared due to privacy legislation. We furthermore calculated time spent and costs used for recruiting both randomly sampled persons and volunteers. Article abstract: Public participation GIS surveys use both random and volunteer sampling to recruit people to participate in a self-administered mapping exercise online. From random sampling designs, the participation rate is known to be relatively low, and biased to specific segments (e.g., mid-aged, educated men). Volunteer sampling provides the opportunity to reach a large crowd at reasonable costs, but generally suffers from unknown sampling biases and lower data quality. The low participation rates and the quality of mapping question the validity and generalizability of the results, limiting its use as a democracy tool for enhancing participation in development and planning. We therefore asked: How can we increase participation in online PPGIS surveys? Is it worth the time and the costs? We reviewed environmentally related, online PPGIS surveys (N=51) and analyzed the sampling biases and recruitment strategies utilized in a large scale online PPGIS platform in coastal areas of Northern Norway using both random sampling (16978 invited participants) and volunteer sampling. We found the time, effort, and costs spent to increase participation rates to yield meager results. We discuss the time and cost efficiency of different recruitment methods, as well as the implications of the low participation levels notwithstanding the recruitment methods used.

This collection contains Environmental Response Management Application (ERMA) GIS layers used as part of the Programmatic Damage Assessment and Restoration Plan (PDARP), including outputs from Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) imagery, helicopter flights surveys (observations) of marine mammal and turtles, Mississippi Canyon 252 wellhead location, wellhead buffers, and supporting bathymetric contour data, infrared and photographic images from EPA's airborne spectral photometric environmental collection technology (ASPECT) with geospatial, chemical and radiological information, boom-related response observations, nearshore tissue and sediment samples, forensic and Total Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon (TPAH) results, stranded oil forensic classification data, and other types of chemistry data, Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV) classifications, seabed sampling and transect data, sample locations for workplan cruises, deep-sea area injury toxicity results and total polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (TPAH) results, habitat injury zones, footprint impacts on mesophotic reef resources and other types of benthic habitat data, overflight imagery of the flight path for the NOAA King Air flights taken in October of 2010 and contains post-oiling images collection in support of Natural Resource Damage Assessment (NRDA) marsh monitoring, turtle survey overflight observations, loggerhead sea turtle density grids, sea turtle capture observations and transect analysis, sea turtle strandings, as well as probabilities of oiling and other related datasets, trawl locations, Southeast Area Monitoring and Assessment Program (SEAMAP) plankton trawls, workplan cruise samples, and other related data, delineation of the areas impacted with additional fresh water due to the opening of the diversions in 2011 as part of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill response, surface shoreline oiling characteristics as observed by field surveys performed by Shoreline Cleanup Assessment Techniques (SCAT) teams, marine mammal surveys, observations, telemetry and abundance data including Cytochrome P450 (CYP) dolphin analysis, population and abundance datasets, telemetry, wildlife and aerial observations, bathymetry estimates, and other related Marine Mammal field observations and surveys, presence and spatial distribution of synthetic-based mud (SBM) in deep-sea sediments around the Macondo well, surface sediment, residual kriging, and other oiling analytical data, oyster recruitment and abundance sampling results, estimates of subtidal habitat, estimates of oyster resource, seafloor substrate mapping layers, percent cover, nearshore and subtidal quadrat abundance data, and other related datasets, shoreline exposure model for beach and marsh oiling, wave exposure, habitat classifications, wetland monitoring datasets, and related shoreline datasets, compilation of all the individual Texture Classifying Neural Network Algorithm (TCNNA) days from Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) satellite polygons, a variety of cumulative oiling datasets including the Texture Classifying Neural Network Algorithm (TCNNA) from Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) satellite polygon layers, burn locations, dispersant operation datasets including estimations of where aerial dispersants were applied via aerial flight paths, dispersant airport locations, daily flight tracks, and vessel dispersant tracks, as well as locations of subsurface dispersant data, marine mammal surveys, observations, telemetry and abundance data collected including synoptic surveys, helicopter surveys, Cytochrome P450 (CYP) dolphin analysis, population and abundance datasets, telemetry, wildlife and aerial observations, bathymetry estimates, other related marine mammal field observations and surveys, and sea turtle data, and other data related to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Northern Gulf of Mexico. Some of these data were collected during the response to the Mississippi Canyon 252 Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Northern Gulf of Mexico.

This project involved a detailed topographic and land use survey in Center for Water Resources and Environmental Studies, countryside of São Carlos-SP, Brazil, employing advanced technologies like Metashape and Geographic Information Systems (GIS). The survey aimed to accurately map the terrain and assess land use patterns within the specified area. Utilizing Metashape for precise photogrammetry and GIS for spatial analysis, the project provided critical insights into the topographical features and land use. This data is essential for urban planning, environmental management, and future development initiatives in the region.

This study focuses on the use of citizen science and GIS tools for collecting and analyzing data on Rose Swanson Mountain in British Columbia, Canada. While several organizations collect data on wildlife habitats, trail mapping, and fire documentation on the mountain, there are few studies conducted on the area and citizen science is not being addressed. The study aims to aggregate various data sources and involve citizens in the data collection process using ArcGIS Dashboard and ArcGIS Survey 123. These GIS tools allow for the integration and analysis of different kinds of data, as well as the creation of interactive maps and surveys that can facilitate citizen engagement and data collection. The data used in the dashboard was sourced from BC Data Catalogue, Explore the Map, and iNaturalist. Results show effective citizen participation, with 1073 wildlife observations and 3043 plant observations. The dashboard provides a user-friendly interface for citizens to tailor their map extent and layers, access surveys, and obtain information on each attribute included in the pop-up by clicking. Analysis on classification of fuel types, ecological communities, endangered wildlife species presence and critical habitat, and scope of human activities can be conducted based on the distribution of data. The dashboard can provide direction for researchers to develop research or contribute to other projects in progress, as well as advocate for natural resource managers to use citizen science data. The study demonstrates the potential for GIS and citizen science to contribute to meaningful discoveries and advancements in areas.

During August 1996, the National Park Service's (NPS) Submerged Cultural Resources Unit (SCRU) conducted a multiresource remote-sensing survey in Yellowstone Lake, Yellowstone National Park (YELL). The general strategy was to apply methodology developed by SCRU for marine resource hydrographic survey to specific management issues at Yellowstone Lake. The first submerged resources surveys designed specifically for Geographic Information System (GIS) applications were conducted several years earlier by SCRU in areas of the National Park System in Florida.

The Australian Antarctic Data Centre's Casey Station GIS data were originally mapped from Aerial photography (January 4 1994). Refer to the metadata record 'Casey Station GIS Dataset'. Since then various features have been added to these data as structures have been removed, moved or established. Some of these features have been surveyed. These surveys have metadata records from which the report describing the survey can be downloaded. However, the locations of other features have been obtained from a variety of sources. The data are included in the data available for download from the provided URLs. The data conforms to the SCAR Feature Catalogue which includes data quality information. See the provided URL. Data described by this metadata record has Dataset_id = 17. Each feature has a Qinfo number which, when entered at the 'Search datasets and quality' tab, provides data quality information for the feature.

Tags

   survey, environmental behaviors, lifestyle, status, PRIZM, Baltimore Ecosystem Study, LTER, BES




   Summary


   BES Research, Applications, and Education


   Description


   Geocoded for Baltimore County. The BES Household Survey 2003 is a telephone survey of metropolitan Baltimore residents consisting of 29 questions. The survey research firm, Hollander, Cohen, and McBride conducted the survey, asking respondents questions about their outdoor recreation activities, watershed knowledge, environmental behavior, neighborhood characteristics and quality of life, lawn maintenance, satisfaction with life, neighborhood, and the environment, and demographic information. The data from each respondent is also associated with a PRIZM� classification, census block group, and latitude-longitude. PRIZM� classifications categorize the American population using Census data, market research surveys, public opinion polls, and point-of-purchase receipts. The PRIZM� classification is spatially explicit allowing the survey data to be viewed and analyzed spatially and allowing specific neighborhood types to be identified and compared based on the survey data. The census block group and latitude-longitude data also allow us additional methods of presenting and analyzing the data spatially. 


   The household survey is part of the core data collection of the Baltimore Ecosystem Study to classify and characterize social and ecological dimensions of neighborhoods (patches) over time and across space. This survey is linked to other core data including US Census data, remotely-sensed data, and field data collection, including the BES DemSoc Field Observation Survey. 



   The BES 2003 telephone survey was conducted by Hollander, Cohen, and McBride from September 1-30, 2003. The sample was obtained from the professional sampling firm Claritas, in order that their "PRIZM" encoding would be appended to each piece of sample (telephone number) supplied. Mailing addresses were also obtained so that a postcard could be sent in advance of interviewers calling. The postcard briefly informed potential respondents about the survey, who was conducting it, and that they might receive a phone call in the next few weeks. A stratified sampling method was used to obtain between 50 - 150 respondents in each of the 15 main PRIZM classifications. This allows direct comparison of PRIZM classifications. Analysis of the data for the general metropolitan Baltimore area must be weighted to match the population proportions normally found in the region. They obtained a total of 9000 telephone numbers in the sample. All 9,000 numbers were dialed but contact was only made on 4,880. 1508 completed an interview, 2524 refused immediately, 147 broke off/incomplete, 84 respondents had moved and were no longer in the correct location, and a qualified respondent was not available on 617 calls. This resulted in a response rate of 36.1% compared with a response rate of 28.2% in 2000. The CATI software (Computer Assisted Terminal Interviewing) randomized the random sample supplied, and was programmed for at least 3 attempted callbacks per number, with emphasis on pulling available callback sample prior to accessing uncalled numbers. Calling was conducted only during evening and weekend hours, when most head of households are home. The use of CATI facilitated stratified sampling on PRIZM classifications, centralized data collection, standardized interviewer training, and reduced the overall cost of primary data collection. Additionally, to reduce respondent burden, the questionnaire was revised to be concise, easy to understand, minimize the use of open-ended responses, and require an average of 15 minutes to complete. 


   The household survey is part of the core data collection of the Baltimore Ecosystem Study to classify and characterize social and ecological dimensions of neighborhoods (patches) over time and across space. This survey is linked to other core data, including US Census data, remotely-sensed data, and field data collection, including the BES DemSoc Field Observation Survey. 


   Additional documentation of this database is attached to this metadata and includes 4 documents, 1) the telephone survey, 2) documentation of the telephone survey, 3) metadata for the telephone survey, and 4) a description of the attribute data in the BES survey 2003 survey.


   This database was created by joining the GDT geographic database of US Census Block Group geographies for the Baltimore Metropolitan Statisticsal Area (MSA), with the Claritas PRIZM database, 2003, of unique classifications of each Census Block Group, and the unique PRIZM code for each respondent from the BES Household Telephone Survey, 2003. The GDT database is preferred and used because

This data release includes GIS datasets supporting the Colorado Legacy Mine Lands Watershed Delineation and Scoring tool (WaDeS), a web mapping application available at https://geonarrative.usgs.gov/colmlwades/. Water chemistry data were compiled from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) National Water Information System (NWIS), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) STORET database, and the USGS Central Colorado Assessment Project (CCAP) (Church and others, 2009). The CCAP study area was used for this application. Samples were summarized at each monitoring station and hardness-dependent chronic and acute toxicity thresholds for aquatic life protections under Colorado Regulation No. 31 (CDPHE, 5 CCR 1002-31) for cadmium, copper, lead, and/or zinc were calculated. Samples were scored according to how metal concentrations compared with acute and chronic toxicity thresholds. The results were used in combination with remote sensing derived hydrothermal alteration (Rockwell and Bonham, 2017) and mine-related features (Horton and San Juan, 2016) to identify potential mine remediation sites within the headwaters of the central Colorado mineral belt. Headwaters were defined by watersheds delineated from a 10-meter digital elevation dataset (DEM), ranging in 5-35 square kilometers in size. Python and R scripts used to derive these products are included with this data release as documentation of the processing steps and to enable users to adapt the methods for their own applications. References Church, S.E., San Juan, C.A., Fey, D.L., Schmidt, T.S., Klein, T.L. DeWitt, E.H., Wanty, R.B., Verplanck, P.L., Mitchell, K.A., Adams, M.G., Choate, L.M., Todorov, T.I., Rockwell, B.W., McEachron, Luke, and Anthony, M.W., 2012, Geospatial database for regional environmental assessment of central Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 614, 76 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ds614. Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE), Water Quality Control Commission 5 CCR 1002-31. Regulation No. 31 The Basic Standards and Methodologies for Surface Water. Effective 12/31/2021, accessed on July 28, 2023 at https://cdphe.colorado.gov/water-quality-control-commission-regulations. Horton, J.D., and San Juan, C.A., 2022, Prospect- and mine-related features from U.S. Geological Survey 7.5- and 15-minute topographic quadrangle maps of the United States (ver. 8.0, September 2022): U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/F78W3CHG. Rockwell, B.W. and Bonham, L.C., 2017, Digital maps of hydrothermal alteration type, key mineral groups, and green vegetation of the western United States derived from automated analysis of ASTER satellite data: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/F7CR5RK7.

The dataset contains a subset of the 200-point survey created for PASS (Phoenix Area Social Survey) project. The main objective of PASS is to examine the reciprocal relationships, or the interplay, between the social and natural environments in an urban ecosystem. In order to understand this complex process, social scientists affiliated with the Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) project conducted a longitudinal social survey of Phoenix residents in 2001. The survey measured the social ties of individuals to their communities, values and sentiments regarding communities, behaviors that affect the natural environment, and satisfaction with the quality of life in the area. The community that people experience most intimately is the neighborhood. Our central research questions ask how neighborhood social ties, values, and behaviors are connected with one another in ways that reflect willingness to act socially and politically with respect to the environment, and how changing environmental conditions, in turn, affect the quality of human life. PASS II is being designed and will be administered in 2006.

Vegetation survey of North Head for Sydney Harbour Federation Trust, by GIS Environmental Consultants. The SHFT_NH(Vegetation survey of North Head for Sydney Harbour Federation Trust, by GIS Environmental Consultants) Survey is part of the Vegetation Information System Survey Program of New South Wales which is a series of systematic vegetation surveys conducted across the state between 1970 and the present.

This layer contains points features representing the New Jersey Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NJPDES) Discharge to Surface Water (DSW) Permittees that participated in the Division of Water Quality’s (DWQ) PFAS Source Evaluation and Reduction Requirements Survey. On March 17, 2021, the DWQ sent a Request for Information letter to Category B Permittees (Industrial Wastewater) and Category L Permittees (Significant Indirect Users). These permittees are industrial users that discharge directly or indirectly to a surface water body. The survey was used to collect and evaluate site-specific information such as on-site use of Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF), use of process materials or aids that may contain PFAS, and industrial operations and processes. The Division is utilizing this information to aid in the development of a strategy to identify and eliminate or reduce sources of PFAS.

The Petrel Sub-basin Marine Environmental Survey GA-0335, (SOL5463) was undertaken by the RV Solander during May 2012 as part of the Commonwealth Government's National Low Emission Coal Initiative (NLECI). The survey was undertaken as a collaboration between the Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS) and GA. The purpose was to acquire geophysical and biophysical data on shallow (less then 100m water depth) seabed environments within two targeted areas in the Petrel Sub-basin to support investigation for CO2 storage potential in these areas. This dataset comprises an interpreted geomorphic map.

Interpreted local-scale geomorphic maps were produced for each survey area in the Petrel Sub-basin using multibeam bathymetry and backscatter grids at 2 m resolution and bathymetric derivatives (e.g. slope; 1-m contours). Five geomorphic units; bank, plain, ridge, terrace and valley, were identified and mapped using definitions suitable for interpretation at the local scale (nominally 1:10 000). Maps and polygons were manual digitised in ArcGIS using the spatial analyst and 3D analyst toolboxes.

Litter surveys using GPS.

"Where is your Stockholm?" ("Var är ditt Stockholm?") is the first Public Participatory GIS (PPGIS) survey to address emotional, social, and environmental qualities at once. The social-ecological picture of Stockholm that emerges from the data can be used for a variety of different purposes; from analysis of everyday routines, to where people in Stockholm connect to the green infrastructure.

Purpose: The dataset aims to describe positive and negative experiences that exist in the landscape of Stockholm together with social, environmental and psychological attributes. Because all datapoints are geographically mapped using GIS, this dataset provides a social-ecological understanding of Stockholm.

The file with background information contains 38 variables and responses from 833 individuals. The file with geographical points contains 94 variables and 2983 registered reports.

Note: This LCMS CONUS Cause of Change image service has been deprecated. It has been replaced by the LCMS CONUS Annual Change image service, which provides updated and consolidated change data.Please refer to the new service here: https://usfs.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=085626ec50324e5e9ad6323c050ac84dThis product is part of the Landscape Change Monitoring System (LCMS) data suite. It shows LCMS change attribution classes for each year. See additional information about change in the Entity_and_Attribute_Information or Fields section below.LCMS is a remote sensing-based system for mapping and monitoring landscape change across the United States. Its objective is to develop a consistent approach using the latest technology and advancements in change detection to produce a "best available" map of landscape change. Because no algorithm performs best in all situations, LCMS uses an ensemble of models as predictors, which improves map accuracy across a range of ecosystems and change processes (Healey et al., 2018). The resulting suite of LCMS change, land cover, and land use maps offer a holistic depiction of landscape change across the United States over the past four decades.Predictor layers for the LCMS model include outputs from the LandTrendr and CCDC change detection algorithms and terrain information. These components are all accessed and processed using Google Earth Engine (Gorelick et al., 2017). To produce annual composites, the cFmask (Zhu and Woodcock, 2012), cloudScore, and TDOM (Chastain et al., 2019) cloud and cloud shadow masking methods are applied to Landsat Tier 1 and Sentinel 2a and 2b Level-1C top of atmosphere reflectance data. The annual medoid is then computed to summarize each year into a single composite. The composite time series is temporally segmented using LandTrendr (Kennedy et al., 2010; Kennedy et al., 2018; Cohen et al., 2018). All cloud and cloud shadow free values are also temporally segmented using the CCDC algorithm (Zhu and Woodcock, 2014). LandTrendr, CCDC and terrain predictors can be used as independent predictor variables in a Random Forest (Breiman, 2001) model. LandTrendr predictor variables include fitted values, pair-wise differences, segment duration, change magnitude, and slope. CCDC predictor variables include CCDC sine and cosine coefficients (first 3 harmonics), fitted values, and pairwise differences from the Julian Day of each pixel used in the annual composites and LandTrendr. Terrain predictor variables include elevation, slope, sine of aspect, cosine of aspect, and topographic position indices (Weiss, 2001) from the USGS 3D Elevation Program (3DEP) (U.S. Geological Survey, 2019). Reference data are collected using TimeSync, a web-based tool that helps analysts visualize and interpret the Landsat data record from 1984-present (Cohen et al., 2010).Outputs fall into three categories: change, land cover, and land use. Change relates specifically to vegetation cover and includes slow loss (not included for PRUSVI), fast loss (which also includes hydrologic changes such as inundation or desiccation), and gain. These values are predicted for each year of the time series and serve as the foundational products for LCMS. References: Breiman, L. (2001). Random Forests. In Machine Learning (Vol. 45, pp. 5-32). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324Chastain, R., Housman, I., Goldstein, J., Finco, M., and Tenneson, K. (2019). Empirical cross sensor comparison of Sentinel-2A and 2B MSI, Landsat-8 OLI, and Landsat-7 ETM top of atmosphere spectral characteristics over the conterminous United States. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 221, pp. 274-285). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.11.012Cohen, W. B., Yang, Z., and Kennedy, R. (2010). Detecting trends in forest disturbance and recovery using yearly Landsat time series: 2. TimeSync - Tools for calibration and validation. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 114, Issue 12, pp. 2911-2924). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.07.010Cohen, W. B., Yang, Z., Healey, S. P., Kennedy, R. E., and Gorelick, N. (2018). A LandTrendr multispectral ensemble for forest disturbance detection. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 205, pp. 131-140). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.11.015Foga, S., Scaramuzza, P.L., Guo, S., Zhu, Z., Dilley, R.D., Beckmann, T., Schmidt, G.L., Dwyer, J.L., Hughes, M.J., Laue, B. (2017). Cloud detection algorithm comparison and validation for operational Landsat data products. Remote Sensing of Environment, 194, 379-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.03.026Gorelick, N., Hancher, M., Dixon, M., Ilyushchenko, S., Thau, D., and Moore, R. (2017). Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 202, pp. 18-27). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031Healey, S. P., Cohen, W. B., Yang, Z., Kenneth Brewer, C., Brooks, E. B., Gorelick, N., Hernandez, A. J., Huang, C., Joseph Hughes, M., Kennedy, R. E., Loveland, T. R., Moisen, G. G., Schroeder, T. A., Stehman, S. V., Vogelmann, J. E., Woodcock, C. E., Yang, L., and Zhu, Z. (2018). Mapping forest change using stacked generalization: An ensemble approach. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 204, pp. 717-728). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.09.029Kennedy, R. E., Yang, Z., and Cohen, W. B. (2010). Detecting trends in forest disturbance and recovery using yearly Landsat time series: 1. LandTrendr - Temporal segmentation algorithms. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 114, Issue 12, pp. 2897-2910). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.07.008Kennedy, R., Yang, Z., Gorelick, N., Braaten, J., Cavalcante, L., Cohen, W., and Healey, S. (2018). Implementation of the LandTrendr Algorithm on Google Earth Engine. In Remote Sensing (Vol. 10, Issue 5, p. 691). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10050691Olofsson, P., Foody, G. M., Herold, M., Stehman, S. V., Woodcock, C. E., and Wulder, M. A. (2014). Good practices for estimating area and assessing accuracy of land change. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 148, pp. 42-57). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.02.015Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M. and Duchesnay, E. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. In Journal of Machine Learning Research (Vol. 12, pp. 2825-2830).Pengra, B. W., Stehman, S. V., Horton, J. A., Dockter, D. J., Schroeder, T. A., Yang, Z., Cohen, W. B., Healey, S. P., and Loveland, T. R. (2020). Quality control and assessment of interpreter consistency of annual land cover reference data in an operational national monitoring program. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 238, p. 111261). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111261U.S. Geological Survey. (2019). USGS 3D Elevation Program Digital Elevation Model, accessed August 2022 at https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/USGS_3DEP_10mWeiss, A.D. (2001). Topographic position and landforms analysis Poster Presentation, ESRI Users Conference, San Diego, CAZhu, Z., and Woodcock, C. E. (2012). Object-based cloud and cloud shadow detection in Landsat imagery. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 118, pp. 83-94). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.10.028Zhu, Z., and Woodcock, C. E. (2014). Continuous change detection and classification of land cover using all available Landsat data. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 144, pp. 152-171). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.01.011This record was taken from the USDA Enterprise Data Inventory that feeds into the https://data.gov catalog. Data for this record includes the following resources: ISO-19139 metadata ArcGIS Hub Dataset ArcGIS GeoService For complete information, please visit https://data.gov.

Digital line graph (DLG) data are digital representations of cartographic information. DLG's of map features are converted to digital form from maps and related sources. Intermediate-scale DLG data are derived from USGS 1:100,000-scale 30- by 60-minute quadrangle maps. If these maps are not available, Bureau of Land Management planimetric maps at a scale of 1: 100,000 are used. Intermediate-scale DLG's are sold in five categories: (1) Public Land Survey System; (2) boundaries (3) transportation; (4) hydrography; and (5) hypsography. All DLG data distributed by the USGS are DLG - Level 3 (DLG-3), which means the data contain a full range of attribute codes, have full topological structuring, and have passed certain quality-control checks.

Do you want to start using Survey 123 but don't feel ready to build your own form? This off the shelf fieldwork survey is for you.This survey allows you to collect and analyse located data for environmental quality.

This is a complete dataset of all outputs produced from a survey assessing environmental knowledge (and knowledge gas) across local communities in the Iveragh peninsula, Co. Kerry, Ireland, during the first months of 2021. The dataset includes chart and figures, maps produced using GIS, mind maps, spreadsheets, and a supporting document containing all relevant metadata.

This data set comprises the Environmental Sensitivity Index (ESI) data for Rhode Island, Connecticut, and the New York - New Jersey Metropolitan Area from 1999 to 2001. ESI data characterize estuarine environments and wildlife by their sensitivity to spilled oil. The ESI data include information for three main components: shoreline habitats, sensitive biological resources, and human-use resources. This atlas was developed to be utilized within desktop GIS systems and contains GIS files and related D-base files. Associated files include MOSS (Multiple Overlay Statistical System) export files, .PDF maps, and detailed user guides and metadata.

This dataset contains data used to test the protocol for high-resolution mapping and monitoring of recreational impacts in protected natural areas (PNAs) using unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) surveys, Structure-from-Motion (SfM) data processing and geographic information systems (GIS) analysis to derive spatially coherent information about trail conditions (Tomczyk et al., 2023). Dataset includes the following folders:

Cocora_raster_data (~3GB) and Vinicunca_raster_data (~32GB) - a very high-resolution (cm-scale) dataset derived from UAV-generated images. Data covers selected recreational trails in Colombia (Valle de Cocora) and Peru (Vinicunca). UAV-captured images were processed using the structure-from-motion approach in Agisoft Metashape software. Data are available as GeoTIFF files in the UTM projected coordinate system (UTM 18N for Colombia, UTM 19S for Peru). Individual files are named as follows [location]_[year]_[product]_[raster cell size].tif, where:

[location] is the place of data collection (e.g., Cocora, Vinicucna)

[year] is the year of data collection (e.g., 2023)

[product] is the tape of files: DEM = digital elevation model; ortho = orthomosaic; hs = hillshade

[raster cell size] is the dimension of individual raster cell in mm (e.g., 15mm)

Cocora_vector_data. and Vinicunca_vector_data – mapping of trail tread and conditions in GIS environment (ArcPro). Data are available as shp files. Data are in the UTM projected coordinate system (UTM 18N for Colombia, UTM 19S for Peru).

Structure-from-motio n processing was performed in Agisoft Metashape (https://www.agisoft.com/, Agisoft, 2023). Mapping was performed in ArcGIS Pro (https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/about-arcgis/overview, Esri, 2022). Data can be used in any GIS software, including commercial (e.g. ArcGIS) or open source (e.g. QGIS).

Tomczyk, A. M., Ewertowski, M. W., Creany, N., Monz, C. A., & Ancin-Murguzur, F. J. (2023). The application of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) surveys and GIS to the analysis and monitoring of recreational trail conditions. International Journal of Applied Earth Observations and Geoinformation, 103474. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2023.103474