65 datasets found
  1. Integrated Assessment of Behavioral and Environmental Risk Factors for Lyme...

    • plos.figshare.com
    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    docx
    Updated Jun 4, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Casey Finch; Mohammed Salim Al-Damluji; Peter J. Krause; Linda Niccolai; Tanner Steeves; Corrine Folsom O’Keefe; Maria A. Diuk-Wasser (2023). Integrated Assessment of Behavioral and Environmental Risk Factors for Lyme Disease Infection on Block Island, Rhode Island [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084758
    Explore at:
    docxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 4, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Casey Finch; Mohammed Salim Al-Damluji; Peter J. Krause; Linda Niccolai; Tanner Steeves; Corrine Folsom O’Keefe; Maria A. Diuk-Wasser
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Block Island, Rhode Island
    Description

    Peridomestic exposure to Borrelia burgdorferi-infected Ixodes scapularis nymphs is considered the dominant means of infection with black-legged tick-borne pathogens in the eastern United States. Population level studies have detected a positive association between the density of infected nymphs and Lyme disease incidence. At a finer spatial scale within endemic communities, studies have focused on individual level risk behaviors, without accounting for differences in peridomestic nymphal density. This study simultaneously assessed the influence of peridomestic tick exposure risk and human behavior risk factors for Lyme disease infection on Block Island, Rhode Island. Tick exposure risk on Block Island properties was estimated using remotely sensed landscape metrics that strongly correlated with tick density at the individual property level. Behavioral risk factors and Lyme disease serology were assessed using a longitudinal serosurvey study. Significant factors associated with Lyme disease positive serology included one or more self-reported previous Lyme disease episodes, wearing protective clothing during outdoor activities, the average number of hours spent daily in tick habitat, the subject’s age and the density of shrub edges on the subject’s property. The best fit multivariate model included previous Lyme diagnoses and age. The strength of this association with previous Lyme disease suggests that the same sector of the population tends to be repeatedly infected. The second best multivariate model included a combination of environmental and behavioral factors, namely hours spent in vegetation, subject’s age, shrub edge density (increase risk) and wearing protective clothing (decrease risk). Our findings highlight the importance of concurrent evaluation of both environmental and behavioral factors to design interventions to reduce the risk of tick-borne infections.

  2. Epidemiological geography at work. An exploratory review about the overall...

    • zenodo.org
    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    Updated Jul 19, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Andrea Marco Raffaele Pranzo; Andrea Marco Raffaele Pranzo (2024). Epidemiological geography at work. An exploratory review about the overall findings of spatial analysis applied to the study of CoViD-19 propagation along the first pandemic year (DATASET) [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4685964
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 19, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
    Authors
    Andrea Marco Raffaele Pranzo; Andrea Marco Raffaele Pranzo
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Literature review dataset

    This table lists the surveyed papers concerning the application of spatial analysis, GIS (Geographic Information Systems) as well as general geographic approaches and geostatistics, to the assessment of CoViD-19 dynamics. The period of survey is from January 1st, 2020 to December 15th, 2020. The first column lists the reference. The second lists the date of publication (preferably, the date of online publication). The third column lists the Country or the Countries and/or the subnational entities investigated. The fourth column lists the epidemiological data utilized in each paper. The fifth column lists other types of data utilized for the analysis. The sixth column lists the more traditionally statistically-based methods, if utilized. The seventh column lists the geo-statistical, GIS or geographic methods, if utilized. The eight column sums up the findings of each paper. The papers are also classified within seven thematic categories. The full references are available at the end of the table in alphabetical order.

    This table was the basis for the realization of a comprehensive geographic literature review. It aims to be a useful tool to ease the "due-diligence" activity of all the researchers interested in the spatial analysis of the pandemic.

    The reference to cite the related paper is the following:

    Pranzo, A.M.R., Dai Prà, E. & Besana, A. Epidemiological geography at work: An exploratory review about the overall findings of spatial analysis applied to the study of CoViD-19 propagation along the first pandemic year. GeoJournal (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-022-10601-y

    To read the manuscript please follow this link: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-022-10601-y

  3. Table 1_Pathogenic built environment? Reflections on modeling spatial...

    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    docx
    Updated Mar 17, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Tobia Lakes; Tillman Schmitz; Henning Füller (2025). Table 1_Pathogenic built environment? Reflections on modeling spatial determinants of health in urban settings considering the example of COVID-19 studies.docx [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1502897.s001
    Explore at:
    docxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 17, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers Mediahttp://www.frontiersin.org/
    Authors
    Tobia Lakes; Tillman Schmitz; Henning Füller
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The triad of host, agent, and environment has become a widely accepted framework for understanding infectious diseases and human health. While modern medicine has traditionally focused on the individual, there is a renewed interest in the role of the environment. Recent studies have shifted from an early-twentieth-century emphasis on individual factors to a broader consideration of contextual factors, including environmental, climatic, and social settings as spatial determinants of health. This shifted focus has been particularly relevant in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, where the built environment in urban settings is increasingly recognized as a crucial factor influencing disease transmission. However, operationalizing the complexity of associations between the built environment and health for empirical analyses presents significant challenges. This study aims to identify key caveats in the operationalization of spatial determinants of health for empirical analysis and proposes guiding principles for future research. We focus on how the built environment in urban settings was studied in recent literature on COVID-19. Based on a set of criteria, we analyze 23 studies and identify explicit and implicit assumptions regarding the health-related dimensions of the built environment. Our findings highlight the complexities and potential pitfalls, referred to as the ‘spatial trap,' in the current approaches to spatial epidemiology concerning COVID-19. We conclude with recommendations and guiding questions for future studies to avoid falsely attributing a built environment impact on health outcomes and to clarify explicit and implicit assumptions regarding the health-related dimensions.

  4. Epidemiology and ArcGIS Insights - Part 1

    • coronavirus-disasterresponse.hub.arcgis.com
    • coronavirus-resources.esri.com
    Updated May 13, 2020
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Esri’s Disaster Response Program (2020). Epidemiology and ArcGIS Insights - Part 1 [Dataset]. https://coronavirus-disasterresponse.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/disasterresponse::epidemiology-and-arcgis-insights-part-1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 13, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    Esrihttp://esri.com/
    Authors
    Esri’s Disaster Response Program
    Description

    Part 1 of an overview of epidemiology, and what ArcGIS Insights offers for the analytical needs of the epidemiologist.Key topics with examples covering major areas of epidemiological study and the scope of GIS to provide an analytical framework. _Communities around the world are taking strides in mitigating the threat that COVID-19 (coronavirus) poses. Geography and location analysis have a crucial role in better understanding this evolving pandemic.When you need help quickly, Esri can provide data, software, configurable applications, and technical support for your emergency GIS operations. Use GIS to rapidly access and visualize mission-critical information. Get the information you need quickly, in a way that’s easy to understand, to make better decisions during a crisis.Esri’s Disaster Response Program (DRP) assists with disasters worldwide as part of our corporate citizenship. We support response and relief efforts with GIS technology and expertise.More information...

  5. a

    Epidemiology

    • resources-gisinschools-nz.hub.arcgis.com
    • gisinschools.eagle.co.nz
    Updated Sep 4, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    GIS in Schools - Teaching Materials - New Zealand (2020). Epidemiology [Dataset]. https://resources-gisinschools-nz.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/epidemiology
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 4, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    GIS in Schools - Teaching Materials - New Zealand
    Description

    Epidemiology is a field of study that looks at patterns of health and disease within a population. This includes the study of factors that contribute to illness. To determine the frequency and causes of illness, epidemiologists focus on studying communities rather than individuals. Use of epidemiology to study characteristics of illnesses and their associated factors can be used to prevent and control public health problems.Epidemiologists study not only infectious diseases, but also environmental exposures to toxins and pollutants, workplace and crime-related injuries, birth defects, mental health, and substance abuse. To characterize these illnesses and conditions, epidemiology depends on statistics to measure rates of incidence, prevalence, and mortality.

  6. PLACES: Place Data (GIS Friendly Format), 2022 release

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.virginia.gov
    • +5more
    Updated Jun 28, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2025). PLACES: Place Data (GIS Friendly Format), 2022 release [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/places-place-data-gis-friendly-format-2022-release
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 28, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Centers for Disease Control and Preventionhttp://www.cdc.gov/
    Description

    This dataset contains model-based place (incorporated and census designated places) level estimates for the PLACES 2022 release in GIS-friendly format. PLACES covers the entire United States—50 states and the District of Columbia (DC)—at county, place, census tract, and ZIP Code Tabulation Area levels. It provides information uniformly on this large scale for local areas at 4 geographic levels. Estimates were provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of Population Health, Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch. PLACES was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation in conjunction with the CDC Foundation. Data sources used to generate these model-based estimates include Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 2020 or 2019 data, Census Bureau 2010 population estimates, and American Community Survey (ACS) 2015–2019 estimates. The 2022 release uses 2020 BRFSS data for 25 measures and 2019 BRFSS data for 4 measures (high blood pressure, taking high blood pressure medication, high cholesterol, and cholesterol screening) that the survey collects data on every other year. These data can be joined with the 2019 Census TIGER/Line place boundary file in a GIS system to produce maps for 29 measures at the place level. An ArcGIS Online feature service is also available for users to make maps online or to add data to desktop GIS software. https://cdcarcgis.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=3b7221d4e47740cab9235b839fa55cd7

  7. D

    500 Cities: City-level Data (GIS Friendly Format), 2018 release

    • data.cdc.gov
    • data.virginia.gov
    • +3more
    csv, xlsx, xml
    Updated Dec 5, 2019
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Population Health (2019). 500 Cities: City-level Data (GIS Friendly Format), 2018 release [Dataset]. https://data.cdc.gov/w/pf7q-w24q/tdwk-ruhb?cur=-U0NN7_95wQ&from=root
    Explore at:
    xml, csv, xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 5, 2019
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Population Health
    License

    U.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    2016, 2015. Data were provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of Population Health, Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch. The project was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) in conjunction with the CDC Foundation. 500 cities project city-level data in GIS-friendly format can be joined with city spatial data (https://chronicdata.cdc.gov/500-Cities/500-Cities-City-Boundaries/n44h-hy2j) in a geographic information system (GIS) to produce maps of 27 measures at the city-level. There are 4 measures (high blood pressure, taking high blood pressure medication, high cholesterol, cholesterol screening) in this 2018 release from the 2015 BRFSS that were the same as the 2017 release.

  8. PLACES: Place Data (GIS Friendly Format), 2020 release

    • splitgraph.com
    • healthdata.gov
    • +4more
    Updated Aug 25, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Population Health (2023). PLACES: Place Data (GIS Friendly Format), 2020 release [Dataset]. https://www.splitgraph.com/cdc-gov/places-place-data-gis-friendly-format-2020-release-ndzg-9nmv
    Explore at:
    application/vnd.splitgraph.image, application/openapi+json, jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 25, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Centers for Disease Control and Preventionhttp://www.cdc.gov/
    Authors
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Population Health
    License

    U.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This dataset contains model-based place (incorporated and census designated places) level estimates for the PLACES project 2020 release in GIS-friendly format. The PLACES project is the expansion of the original 500 Cities project and covers the entire United States—50 states and the District of Columbia (DC)—at county, place, census tract, and ZIP Code tabulation Areas (ZCTA) levels. It represents a first-of-its kind effort to release information uniformly on this large scale for local areas at 4 geographic levels. Estimates were provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of Population Health, Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch. The project was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) in conjunction with the CDC Foundation. Data sources used to generate these model-based estimates include Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 2018 or 2017 data, Census Bureau 2010 population estimates, and American Community Survey (ACS) 2014-2018 or 2013-2017 estimates. The 2020 release uses 2018 BRFSS data for 23 measures and 2017 BRFSS data for 4 measures (high blood pressure, taking high blood pressure medication, high cholesterol, and cholesterol screening). Four measures are based on the 2017 BRFSS data because the relevant questions are only asked every other year in the BRFSS. These data can be joined with the 2019 Census TIGER/Line place boundary file in a GIS system to produce maps for 27 measures at the place level. An ArcGIS Online feature service is also available at https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=8eca985039464f4d83467b8f6aeb1320 for users to make maps online or to add data to desktop GIS software.

    Splitgraph serves as an HTTP API that lets you run SQL queries directly on this data to power Web applications. For example:

    See the Splitgraph documentation for more information.

  9. 500 Cities: Census Tract-level Data (GIS Friendly Format), 2017 release

    • data.cdc.gov
    • data.virginia.gov
    • +4more
    csv, xlsx, xml
    Updated Oct 15, 2018
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Population Health (2018). 500 Cities: Census Tract-level Data (GIS Friendly Format), 2017 release [Dataset]. https://data.cdc.gov/500-Cities-Places/500-Cities-Census-Tract-level-Data-GIS-Friendly-Fo/kucs-wizg
    Explore at:
    xml, xlsx, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 15, 2018
    Dataset provided by
    Centers for Disease Control and Preventionhttp://www.cdc.gov/
    Authors
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Population Health
    License

    U.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    2015, 2014. Data were provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of Population Health, Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch. The project was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) in conjunction with the CDC Foundation. 500 cities project census tract-level data in GIS-friendly format can be joined with census tract spatial data (https://chronicdata.cdc.gov/500-Cities/500-Cities-Census-Tract-Boundaries/x7zy-2xmx) in a geographic information system (GIS) to produce maps of 27 measures at the census tract level. Because some questions are only asked every other year in the BRFSS, there are 7 measures in this 2017 release from the 2014 BRFSS that were the same as the 2016 release.

  10. PLACES: Census Tract Data (GIS Friendly Format), 2024 release

    • data.cdc.gov
    • healthdata.gov
    • +3more
    Updated Aug 23, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Population Health (2024). PLACES: Census Tract Data (GIS Friendly Format), 2024 release [Dataset]. https://data.cdc.gov/500-Cities-Places/PLACES-Census-Tract-Data-GIS-Friendly-Format-2024-/yjkw-uj5s
    Explore at:
    kmz, application/geo+json, kml, csv, xlsx, xmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 23, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Centers for Disease Control and Preventionhttp://www.cdc.gov/
    Authors
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Population Health
    License

    U.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This dataset contains model-based census tract level estimates in GIS-friendly format. PLACES covers the entire United States—50 states and the District of Columbia—at county, place, census tract, and ZIP Code Tabulation Area levels. It provides information uniformly on this large scale for local areas at four geographic levels. Estimates were provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of Population Health, Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch. PLACES was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation in conjunction with the CDC Foundation. Data sources used to generate these model-based estimates are Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 2022 or 2021 data, Census Bureau 2010 population estimates, and American Community Survey (ACS) 2015–2019 estimates. The 2024 release uses 2022 BRFSS data for 36 measures and 2021 BRFSS data for 4 measures (high blood pressure, high cholesterol, cholesterol screening, and taking medicine for high blood pressure control among those with high blood pressure) that the survey collects data on every other year. These data can be joined with the Census tract 2022 boundary file in a GIS system to produce maps for 40 measures at the census tract level. An ArcGIS Online feature service is also available for users to make maps online or to add data to desktop GIS software. https://cdcarcgis.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=3b7221d4e47740cab9235b839fa55cd7

  11. Figure S1 - The South to North Variation of Norovirus Epidemics from 2006–07...

    • figshare.com
    • plos.figshare.com
    docx
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Shinako Inaida; Yugo Shobugawa; Shigeo Matsuno; Reiko Saito; Hiroshi Suzuki (2023). Figure S1 - The South to North Variation of Norovirus Epidemics from 2006–07 to 2008–09 in Japan [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071696.s001
    Explore at:
    docxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Shinako Inaida; Yugo Shobugawa; Shigeo Matsuno; Reiko Saito; Hiroshi Suzuki
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Japan
    Description

    Monthly averages (2006 -2009) of daily maximum temperature (A) and relative humidity (B) in Hokkaido (North area), Tokyo (Middle area), and Fukuoka (South area). Data were obtained from Japan Meteorological Agency (http://www.data.jma.go.jp/obd/stats/data/en/smp/index.html). (DOCX)

  12. u

    PLACES: County Data (GIS Friendly Format) - Dataset - Healthy Communities...

    • midb.uspatial.umn.edu
    Updated Oct 24, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2025). PLACES: County Data (GIS Friendly Format) - Dataset - Healthy Communities Data Portal [Dataset]. https://midb.uspatial.umn.edu/hcdp/dataset/places-county-data-gis-friendly-format
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 24, 2025
    Description

    This dataset contains model-based county-level estimates in a GIS-friendly format. Estimates were created using a unique PLACES methodology. PLACES covers the entire United States—50 states and the District of Columbia—at county, place, census tract, and ZIP Code Tabulation Area levels. Estimates were provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of Population Health, Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch. PLACES was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation in conjunction with the CDC Foundation. Data sources used to generate these model-based estimates are the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 2022 or 2021 data, Census Bureau 2022 county population estimates, and American Community Survey (ACS) 2018–2022 estimates. The 2024 release uses 2022 BRFSS data for 36 measures and 2021 BRFSS data for 4 measures (high blood pressure, high cholesterol, cholesterol screening, and taking medicine for high blood pressure control among those with high blood pressure) that the survey collects data on every other year. These data can be joined with the Census Bureau's 2022 county boundary GIS file in a GIS system to produce maps for 40 measures at the county level.

  13. d

    Data from: A gender-specific geodatabase of five cancer types with the...

    • search.dataone.org
    • dataverse.harvard.edu
    • +1more
    Updated Mar 6, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Firouraghi, Neda (2024). A gender-specific geodatabase of five cancer types with the highest frequency of occurrence in Iran [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/7ZK41X
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 6, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Harvard Dataverse
    Authors
    Firouraghi, Neda
    Description

    This database encompasses several files related to cancer data. The first file is an Excel spreadsheet, containing information on newly diagnosed cancer cases from 2014 to 2017. It provides demographic details and specific characteristics of 482,229 cancer patients. We categorized this data according to the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) reporting rules, and cancers with greater incidence rates were identified. To create a geodatabase, individual data was integrated at the county level and combined with population data. Files 2 and 3 contain gender-specific spatial data for the top cancer types and non-melanoma skin cancer. Each file includes county identifications, the number of cancer cases for each cancer type per year, and gender-specific population information. Lastly, there is a user's guide file to help navigate through the data files.

  14. PLACES: County Data (GIS Friendly Format), 2023 release

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.virginia.gov
    • +2more
    Updated Feb 3, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2025). PLACES: County Data (GIS Friendly Format), 2023 release [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/places-county-data-gis-friendly-format-2023-release
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 3, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Centers for Disease Control and Preventionhttp://www.cdc.gov/
    Description

    This dataset contains model-based county-level estimates in GIS-friendly format. PLACES covers the entire United States—50 states and the District of Columbia—at county, place, census tract, and ZIP Code Tabulation Area levels. It provides information uniformly on this large scale for local areas at four geographic levels. Estimates were provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of Population Health, Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch. Project was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation in conjunction with the CDC Foundation. Data sources used to generate these model-based estimates are Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 2021 or 2020 data, Census Bureau 2021 or 2020 county population estimates, and American Community Survey (ACS) 2017–2021 or 2016–2020 estimates. The 2023 release uses 2021 BRFSS data for 29 measures and 2020 BRFSS data for 7 measures (all teeth lost, dental visits, mammograms, cervical cancer screening, colorectal cancer screening, core preventive services among older adults, and sleeping less than 7 hours) that the survey collects data on every other year. These data can be joined with the census 2020 county boundary file in a GIS system to produce maps for 36 measures at the county level. An ArcGIS Online feature service is also available for users to make maps online or to add data to desktop GIS software. https://cdcarcgis.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=2c3deb0c05a748b391ea8c9cf9903588

  15. V

    PLACES: Census Tract Data (GIS Friendly Format), 2020 release

    • data.virginia.gov
    • healthdata.gov
    • +2more
    csv, json, rdf, xsl
    Updated Aug 25, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2023). PLACES: Census Tract Data (GIS Friendly Format), 2020 release [Dataset]. https://data.virginia.gov/dataset/places-census-tract-data-gis-friendly-format-2020-release
    Explore at:
    csv, rdf, json, xslAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 25, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    Description

    This dataset contains model-based census tract level estimates for the PLACES project 2020 release in GIS-friendly format. The PLACES project is the expansion of the original 500 Cities project and covers the entire United States—50 states and the District of Columbia (DC)—at county, place, census tract, and ZIP Code tabulation Areas (ZCTA) levels. It represents a first-of-its kind effort to release information uniformly on this large scale for local areas at 4 geographic levels. Estimates were provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of Population Health, Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch. The project was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) in conjunction with the CDC Foundation. Data sources used to generate these model-based estimates include Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 2018 or 2017 data, Census Bureau 2010 population estimates, and American Community Survey (ACS) 2014-2018 or 2013-2017 estimates. The 2020 release uses 2018 BRFSS data for 23 measures and 2017 BRFSS data for 4 measures (high blood pressure, taking high blood pressure medication, high cholesterol, and cholesterol screening). Four measures are based on the 2017 BRFSS data because the relevant questions are only asked every other year in the BRFSS. These data can be joined with the census tract 2015 boundary file in a GIS system to produce maps for 27 measures at the census tract level. An ArcGIS Online feature service is also available at https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=8eca985039464f4d83467b8f6aeb1320 for users to make maps online or to add data to desktop GIS software.

  16. Univariate models.

    • plos.figshare.com
    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    xls
    Updated Jun 2, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Casey Finch; Mohammed Salim Al-Damluji; Peter J. Krause; Linda Niccolai; Tanner Steeves; Corrine Folsom O’Keefe; Maria A. Diuk-Wasser (2023). Univariate models. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084758.t003
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 2, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Casey Finch; Mohammed Salim Al-Damluji; Peter J. Krause; Linda Niccolai; Tanner Steeves; Corrine Folsom O’Keefe; Maria A. Diuk-Wasser
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Univariate logistic regression models of the association between human behaviors and landscape metrics and positive Lyme disease serology. Statistically significant results at p

  17. Behavioral and demographic characteristics of survey responders in relation...

    • plos.figshare.com
    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    xls
    Updated May 31, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Casey Finch; Mohammed Salim Al-Damluji; Peter J. Krause; Linda Niccolai; Tanner Steeves; Corrine Folsom O’Keefe; Maria A. Diuk-Wasser (2023). Behavioral and demographic characteristics of survey responders in relation to their serological status. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084758.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 31, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Casey Finch; Mohammed Salim Al-Damluji; Peter J. Krause; Linda Niccolai; Tanner Steeves; Corrine Folsom O’Keefe; Maria A. Diuk-Wasser
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Percent positive (or average) responses over the total responses for each question for behaviors and age reported by B. burgdorferi seropositive and seronegative participants in serological surveys between 2005 and 2011.Use of any protective measure = use of either protective clothing, tick checking, repellent or avoiding brush.

  18. V

    PLACES: ZCTA Data (GIS Friendly Format), 2023 release

    • data.virginia.gov
    • healthdata.gov
    • +3more
    csv, json, rdf, xsl
    Updated Aug 26, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2024). PLACES: ZCTA Data (GIS Friendly Format), 2023 release [Dataset]. https://data.virginia.gov/dataset/places-zcta-data-gis-friendly-format-2023-release
    Explore at:
    csv, json, rdf, xslAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 26, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    Description

    This dataset contains model-based ZIP Code Tabulation Area (ZCTA) level estimates in GIS-friendly format. PLACES covers the entire United States—50 states and the District of Columbia—at county, place, census tract, and ZIP Code Tabulation Area levels. It provides information uniformly on this large scale for local areas at four geographic levels. Estimates were provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of Population Health, Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch. PLACES was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation in conjunction with the CDC Foundation. Data sources used to generate these model-based estimates are Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 2021 or 2020 data, Census Bureau 2010 population estimates, and American Community Survey (ACS) 2015–2019 estimates. The 2023 release uses 2021 BRFSS data for 29 measures and 2020 BRFSS data for 7 measures (all teeth lost, dental visits, mammograms, cervical cancer screening, colorectal cancer screening, core preventive services among older adults, and sleeping less than 7 hours) that the survey collects data on every other year. These data can be joined with the census 2010 ZCTA boundary file in a GIS system to produce maps for 36 measures at the ZCTA level. An ArcGIS Online feature service is also available for users to make maps online or to add data to desktop GIS software. https://cdcarcgis.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=2c3deb0c05a748b391ea8c9cf9903588

  19. Landscape predictors of the density of host-seeking I. scapularis nymphs.

    • plos.figshare.com
    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    xls
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Casey Finch; Mohammed Salim Al-Damluji; Peter J. Krause; Linda Niccolai; Tanner Steeves; Corrine Folsom O’Keefe; Maria A. Diuk-Wasser (2023). Landscape predictors of the density of host-seeking I. scapularis nymphs. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084758.t002
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Casey Finch; Mohammed Salim Al-Damluji; Peter J. Krause; Linda Niccolai; Tanner Steeves; Corrine Folsom O’Keefe; Maria A. Diuk-Wasser
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Negative binomial regression univariate models of the association between lawn and shrub landscape metrics and the density of host-seeking Ixodes scapularis nymphs (statistically significant results at p

  20. Multivariate model.

    • plos.figshare.com
    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    xls
    Updated Jun 3, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Casey Finch; Mohammed Salim Al-Damluji; Peter J. Krause; Linda Niccolai; Tanner Steeves; Corrine Folsom O’Keefe; Maria A. Diuk-Wasser (2023). Multivariate model. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084758.t004
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 3, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Casey Finch; Mohammed Salim Al-Damluji; Peter J. Krause; Linda Niccolai; Tanner Steeves; Corrine Folsom O’Keefe; Maria A. Diuk-Wasser
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Best fit (lowest QIC score) multivariate logistic regression model of the association between human behaviors and landscape metrics and positive Lyme disease serology.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Casey Finch; Mohammed Salim Al-Damluji; Peter J. Krause; Linda Niccolai; Tanner Steeves; Corrine Folsom O’Keefe; Maria A. Diuk-Wasser (2023). Integrated Assessment of Behavioral and Environmental Risk Factors for Lyme Disease Infection on Block Island, Rhode Island [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084758
Organization logo

Integrated Assessment of Behavioral and Environmental Risk Factors for Lyme Disease Infection on Block Island, Rhode Island

Explore at:
38 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
docxAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Jun 4, 2023
Dataset provided by
PLOShttp://plos.org/
Authors
Casey Finch; Mohammed Salim Al-Damluji; Peter J. Krause; Linda Niccolai; Tanner Steeves; Corrine Folsom O’Keefe; Maria A. Diuk-Wasser
License

Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Area covered
Block Island, Rhode Island
Description

Peridomestic exposure to Borrelia burgdorferi-infected Ixodes scapularis nymphs is considered the dominant means of infection with black-legged tick-borne pathogens in the eastern United States. Population level studies have detected a positive association between the density of infected nymphs and Lyme disease incidence. At a finer spatial scale within endemic communities, studies have focused on individual level risk behaviors, without accounting for differences in peridomestic nymphal density. This study simultaneously assessed the influence of peridomestic tick exposure risk and human behavior risk factors for Lyme disease infection on Block Island, Rhode Island. Tick exposure risk on Block Island properties was estimated using remotely sensed landscape metrics that strongly correlated with tick density at the individual property level. Behavioral risk factors and Lyme disease serology were assessed using a longitudinal serosurvey study. Significant factors associated with Lyme disease positive serology included one or more self-reported previous Lyme disease episodes, wearing protective clothing during outdoor activities, the average number of hours spent daily in tick habitat, the subject’s age and the density of shrub edges on the subject’s property. The best fit multivariate model included previous Lyme diagnoses and age. The strength of this association with previous Lyme disease suggests that the same sector of the population tends to be repeatedly infected. The second best multivariate model included a combination of environmental and behavioral factors, namely hours spent in vegetation, subject’s age, shrub edge density (increase risk) and wearing protective clothing (decrease risk). Our findings highlight the importance of concurrent evaluation of both environmental and behavioral factors to design interventions to reduce the risk of tick-borne infections.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu